Slashdot Mirror


Google's Secret China Project 'Effectively Ended' After Internal Confrontation: Report (theintercept.com)

Less than five months after Google's plan to build a censored search engine and other tools for the Chinese market became public, the company has "effectively ended" the project, reports The Intercept. From the report: Google has been forced to shut down a data analysis system it was using to develop a censored search engine for China after members of the company's privacy team raised internal complaints that it had been kept secret from them, The Intercept has learned. The internal rift over the system has had massive ramifications, effectively ending work on the censored search engine, known as Dragonfly, according to two sources familiar with the plans. The incident represents a major blow to top Google executives, including CEO Sundar Pichai, who have over the last two years made the China project one of their main priorities.

The dispute began in mid-August, when the The Intercept revealed that Google employees working on Dragonfly had been using a Beijing-based website to help develop blacklists for the censored search engine, which was designed to block out broad categories of information related to democracy, human rights, and peaceful protest, in accordance with strict rules on censorship in China that are enforced by the country's authoritarian Communist Party government.

82 comments

  1. Ended? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No way is Google ending this. Spin it off into its own company, maybe not even part of Alphabet, but no way does Google just walk away from China.

    1. Re: Ended? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I agree. Google loves money. Theyd sell their country out to make a buck. Hypocritical.

    2. Re:Ended? by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The got caught doing an unpopular (perhaps unethical) project, that project name is now tainted. So Google has only one recourse. Changed the name of the project, and bring in better marketing people to spin the new product more positively.
       

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    3. Re: Ended? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a company founded by Russian Jews and run by a Hindu. Which country is "their country? exactly?

    4. Re:Ended? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly! Like they are going to walk away from money.

    5. Re:Ended? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "One does not simply walk into Mordor."

    6. Re:Ended? by MobyDisk · · Score: 2

      Regardless of what happens, Americans should remain vigilant against the worst-case scenario here: the US government repeals Network Neutrality, and passes laws requiring ISPs to block certain web sites under the guise of protecting us from ter'rists, child pornographers, and fake news. So Google restarts the project, the feds tell their constituents that this to project them, and then it all happens over again but without the push back.

      Sorry if that sounds preposterous -- hopefully it will not happen -- but we should make sure we keep an eye out for this and educate our children about the first amendment.

    7. Re:Ended? by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      Actually most likely they will set the effort aside for some time. Management that still invested in it will recall who the loyalists were. Those folks will be promoted for being "team players".

      Having solidified their support among middle management upper management will try again in a year or two. They will tell everyone how "this time its different" while those newly minted middle manager dust off the old projects plans, check the old code back into new repos and pass everything through sed replacing the old name with the latest feel good version. More than likely with some obnoxious new Orwellian name like the
      People's Democratic Search Engine of China.

      This how it usually works.

      I am off to find out if I can register pdse.cn later...

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    8. Re: Ended? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's amazing you don't realize that Google's search engine is already censored in the rest of the world.

    9. Re:Ended? by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      the US government repeals Network Neutrality, and passes laws requiring ISPs to block certain web sites

      No need to repeal NN, it's already baked into the rules. ISPs cannot block or slow lawful content and lawful traffic. Lawful is actually a higher bar than "legal," and there's nothing in NN that says the US cannot define specifically what is lawful content and lawful traffic.

      Just for your edification, here is the link to the latest proposals from the MPAA, in which they describe, among other thinks, "Illegal internet protocol television services," (that would be unlawful traffic), and "Additionally, illegal applications that can make legitimate streaming devices infringing can be found through a myriad of legitimate and specialty app repositories," (which would be your unlawful content).

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    10. Re:Ended? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      They will try to make Android less reliant on Google Search services. They already had to due to EU competition investigations anyway. If they can make Android work in China with the Play Store and other Google services but without Search, the bit which everyone is upset over censorship of, they can still get all that revenue.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    11. Re:Ended? by swillden · · Score: 1

      Actually most likely they will set the effort aside for some time. Management that still invested in it will recall who the loyalists were. Those folks will be promoted for being "team players".

      Highly unlikely. Many of the signatories of the Dragonfly opposition memos, internal and public, were senior, highly-respected and highly-influential staff. People who have tremendous clout... clout based on their track records of delivering big, tough projects, which can't be erased.

      Having solidified their support among middle management upper management will try again in a year or two.

      Might work in other companies. Won't work at Google, not without significant cultural and structural changes. It's really not a normal corporation in many respects.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    12. Re:Ended? by lgw · · Score: 1

      It's an evil project. Google does all evil projects. Therefore they will do this. Simple logic.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    13. Re:Ended? by swillden · · Score: 1

      Simple logic based on a badly flawed premise.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    14. Re: Ended? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought that was the long term goals for drafonfly

    15. Re:Ended? by rtb61 · · Score: 0

      Well, Google try really, really, hard to pretend they are not evil, all those positive research projects, which are really just marketing to make them look good. In this case, well, the damage has been Google, Google as evil as fuck and ain't no amount of feel good research projects are going to fix that. So a job poorly done by Google turns out to be a job well done for us. No more bullshitting about the kind of evil at it's core company we are dealing with, a marketing engine that uses social media as bait, the social function of search to taint and corrupt the global mind scape, just as evil as fuck.

      People now have to stop and think whether they want to be evil and how evil, before they consider working for Google and a lot of existing employees, well, they know their employer is evil enough that they have to fight against it and that, well, is a disgusting thing to have to put up with. I do feel sorrow and empathy for those Google employees who have woken up to have evil the company they contribute to is. Fight against them or leave, only one sound choice leave, when your good efforts are turned to evil, those efforts are still evil once you become aware of the negative outcomes.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    16. Re: Ended? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Definitively unethical. There's no Fucking question about Chinese censorship. Don't qualify or weasel around it. Chinese censorship is evil, period, full stop.

    17. Re:Ended? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no way does Google just walk away from China.

      They will if they're smart. The Chinese aren't interested in genuine business relationships. They only want to steal foreign technology and investment for as long as they can before discarding the withered husks. Any foreign company doing business in China is playing the role of the useful idiot. There will be no profits after all of the mandatory local partner cooperation deals, technology transfers and theft of trade secrets is done. Dealing with the Chinese is like dealing with the Devil. There's no way to come out ahead.

    18. Re: Ended? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And who's to say the concept of bagging on the Chinese government isn't just a fabrication of the US government? If you hate China then ask why...is it because Uncle Sam told you to?

      There is no moral absolute.

    19. Re: Ended? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can we get this fucking asshole banned? Why do we allow sock puppet accounts as long as they are shillings for a company that pretends to be for openness?

    20. Re:Ended? by Agripa · · Score: 1

      The US government is already doing that via things like Operation Choke Point and what New York governor Cuomo is doing to the NRA.

      Patreon has joined Google, various credit card network, and various hosting services in denying service to selected individuals and businesses in the name of political correctness.

  2. Shutdown = moved to another building by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Like Facebook's Building 8.

  3. bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    China has a ton of money and desire for a censored search engine; Google has a knowledge of search engine creation, and a desire for money. Google will find a way.

    1. Re:bullshit by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 4, Funny

      Money, uh, finds a way.

    2. Re: bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Must go faster!!

  4. major blow to Google executives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    when ethics was forced upon them.

    1. Re:major blow to Google executives by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      The same ethics they showed when they fired James Damore? This didn't happen yesterday.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:major blow to Google executives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, the same ethics. Why do you ask? Normally when someone says "Oh, you mean the exact same X as when they did Y" they're suggesting hypocrisy, and that Y isn't a case of X. But I think we can both agree Damore remaining at Google would have essentially sent the message to Google's employees that women weren't valued or welcome there, which would have been utterly unacceptable.

    3. Re:major blow to Google executives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you; I'm glad that other people still remember that incident. I wonder what the condemnation half-life on those sorts of ethical lapses are? Years? I'm still angry at Mozilla for their treatment of Brendon Eich, and that's been about four years now.

  5. Misdirection. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My bet is that its not shut down, just that they are saying this to try to keep the heat off. This would be too huge a blow to their stock price and the executives, otherwise.

  6. Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  7. change China, not Google by swschrad · · Score: 2

    what part of "don't be evil" did the C-suite forget about?

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
    1. Re:change China, not Google by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      That's no longer Google's motto. "in October 2015, Alphabet took "Do the right thing" as its motto, also forming the opening of its corporate code of conduct. The original motto was retained in Google's code of conduct, now a subsidiary of Alphabet. In April 2018, the motto was removed from the code of conduct's preface and retained in its last sentence."

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:change China, not Google by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

      They dropped that a while ago.

    3. Re: change China, not Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It was only a marketing stunt. That's it. That's all it ever was.

    4. Re: change China, not Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was only a marketing stunt. That's it. That's all it ever was.

      Actually, it never had anything at all to do with marketing. The "Don't be evil" motto was created by Google engineers, for Google engineers. It wasn't intended to be any kind of public relations message; indeed it wasn't intended to be shared with the public at all, though Larry Page did mention it in the IPO letter a few years later.

    5. Re:change China, not Google by swillden · · Score: 1

      They dropped that a while ago.

      Nope. It's still in the Code of Conduct. See the final sentence.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    6. Re:change China, not Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Don't be evil." - Implies caution and restraint as priorities.

      "Do the right thing." - Implies moral superiority and abandons the introspective element of the previous motto.

      Pretty fitting to the cultural changes inside Google.

    7. Re: change China, not Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet pretty much everyone heard about the motto back then. Interesting for an "internal" motto.

  8. Not the end. by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 3, Informative

    I get the feeling that there is too much "ambition" (greed) in play here to simply walk away. Instead, it seems like they put this on the back burner until people stop paying attention and then start things going again with a smaller team.

    Scruples seem to be in short supply among executives and board members when it comes to getting a piece of the China pie.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:Not the end. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scruples are in short supply everywhere, right down to the assholes that vote for republicans and democrats. It's just the way you people operate. Can't be helped.

  9. Effectively ended by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    ...and replaced by an identical project under a different name with a different set of employees.

    1. Re:Effectively ended by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 2

      The right way to do this is to disperse the team, have the architects break down their idea into a bunch of pieces, create a spec, and have each on its own being mostly benign. Then they assemble them, file bug reports where the pieces don't match spec, and eventually end up with the final project done with no one the wiser.

      They evidently have a core team who absolutely doesn't give a fuck about ethics, they just messed up because there was a turd in the punchbowl.

    2. Re:Effectively ended by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Google is doing mass surveillance of hundreds of millions of people in order to serve them advertising. There are a lot of people there who don't care about ethics.

    3. Re:Effectively ended by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those people deserve whatever Google has in store for them. They signed up knowing the terms of service. They gleefully continue to use the surveillance network daily. Fuck them.

  10. Google CEO should be fired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The CEO should be fired for supporting oppression.

    That is all.

    1. Re:Google CEO should be fired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Agreed. The article mentions this was one of his top priorities, not just a side-idea being explored. Clearly he doesn't have the requisite ethical fiber to properly lead the company.

  11. Open censorship versus secret censorship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would have been very informative to have Google telling people exactly what they needed to do to comply with Chinese censorship and surveillance policies. I agree if they needed to keep the practices secret then they shouldn't have been doing it at all, but if they could tell everyone what they were being required to do with some level of detail, then that could have been really helpful.

  12. Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... It's about ethics in search engine design.

  13. Pro-Google propaganda on a z-nist outlet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google is the R+D arm of the NSA, and is involved in the trillion dollar project to produce 'autonomous' tanks and other ground vehicles of mass murder for the US Army.

    The NSA, of course, wants the very best forms of data collection in 'enemy' nations like China (and vice versa, of course). Google is the 'tip of the spear'. Modern net horrors like Google actually monitor keystrokes and unsent messages- which when mined provide astonishingly improved versions of 'state of mind' intelligence.

    Google/NSA/GCHQ is about:

    1) monitoring the current mindset of any requested 'grouping' of Humans.
    2) intel on ALL Humans that can later be used to blackmail and coerce said Humans IF they reach interesting positions in their later life.
    3) identification of emerging grass-roots movements and potential leaders so the same can be 'eliminated' or 'co-opted' before they acheive 'dangerous' levels of public awareness.

    And as I said, Google is also the front-runner in so-called 'terminator' military robot projects.

    PS ever ask yourself why Google BLURS out images of military installations in the aerial images of 'enemy' nations, and the internet services of 'enemy' nations does the same with such buildings in the West? YOUR masters sit at the SAME table as their masters, and they see Greater Humanity as the real threat, to be controlled in every way possible.

    PPS Russia, the West and China have an agreement to describe each others deep underground military blasting (that helps builds the current gen of nuclear shelters for the 'elite') as 'natural' earthquakes, with the same fake data describing the fake depth. It is the general populace that is kept in the dark. The same protocol has allowed the j-ish terror state to carry out many atmospheric tests for its illegal nuclear warheads, with the fact of these tests carefully hidden by official Chinese, Russian and Western monitoring outlets.

    1. Re:Pro-Google propaganda on a z-nist outlet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. The spellchecker in Chrome sends everything you type to Google's servers. Every damn shitpost on Slashdot. Every angry email to your boss that you delete at the last minute before sending. They have it all.

  14. Re:Communist by jellomizer · · Score: 1, Interesting

    What is your reasoning behind this?
    A communist (who believes in a highly regulated economy, where the interests of the community exceeds the interests of the individual) isn't an American Patriot, or agrees on Censoring information. Now me personally I don't see communism as an effective economic model, because we have China lagging behind the US, while in terms of resources and demographics it has the ability to exceed the US quite easily, I expect the communist economic model is holding the country back.

    Next, what evidence that they are not censoring conservative American News? Conservative American News is saying it under attack all the time by censors, however it would seem to me that the censors would want to stop them from saying that as well too?

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  15. Re:Communist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They don't attack mainstream conservative news because those are just harmless clueless lap dogs for the corporate establishment, instead they attack alternative news like youtube channels, social media groups, podcasts, etc. and google is just one in many members of the idpol cartel doing this, it goes all the way up to payment processors and the banks, the "leftist" media creates hit lists through smear campaigns and then the rest of the machine mobilizes to suppress the platform and cut off the income of their targets; their crime? any and all opposition to intersectional feminism and identity politics, no matter how mild. You see, idpol is poison that completely neuters anti-corporate and workers' rights efforts, and the masses can't be allowed to have a healthy cause to rally around, so let's sell them this poison that removes economic class from the picture and focuses entirely on superficial traits like gender, ethnicity and sexuality to keep the plebs fighting among themselves, this is how they poisoned Occupy Wall Street and now they have infected the rest of the left, leaving behind a shambling corpse that embodies everything it was supposed to fight against.

  16. Current CEO does not hold Western values by ITRambo · · Score: 2

    Too bad Google has the man in charge that they do. He misrepresented everything to Congress and at the same time had building a Big Brother search engine for China as one of his main goals. Get rid of this guy and bring in someone with a sense of ethics.

    1. Re:Current CEO does not hold Western values by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fascism and communism are Western values. China didn't invent communism (actually totalitarian socialism for the pedantic) but simply fused it with another Western idea, capitalism. Your point?

    2. Re:Current CEO does not hold Western values by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

      What are western values any more? Classical liberalism and free speech? Who the hell still believes in that.

      For the past 50 years the west operated under neo-liberal values. Trade with very few strings attached was supposed to make all things better (the strings being, don't invade other countries, don't sponsor terrorism and don't be someone Israel and/or Saudi Arabia want to see toppled). Russia and China would become more democratic and liberal as trade ties pulled us closer and all would be well in the world.

      Google is perfectly aligned with those values, trade uber alles.

    3. Re:Current CEO does not hold Western values by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He misrepresented everything to Congress and at the same time had building a Big Brother search engine for China as one of his main goals.

      You can take the Indian out of India, but you cannot take the India out of the Indian.

    4. Re:Current CEO does not hold Western values by Agripa · · Score: 1

      Too bad Google has the man in charge that they do. He misrepresented everything to Congress and at the same time had building a Big Brother search engine for China as one of his main goals. Get rid of this guy and bring in someone with a sense of ethics.

      Given the nature of Google's founding, I always figured national security interests (FBI, CIA, NSA) were involved from the start.

      Why did science fiction's ubiquitous surveillance trope have to be the one to become true in my lifetime?

  17. in other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Baidu stocks has soar 50% in the next few hours.

  18. Re:Communist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can see through the hole in your tinfoil.

  19. Communist Countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It should be ILLEGAL to do ANY kind of transaction with a communist country. Why in the hell do we do any business with China? ALL of us have been supporting communism for years ... Amazon ... Wal-Mart ... If we really want to get the message across then purchase and sell to non-communist countries ONLY. I personally have stopped purchasing from Amazon and Wal-Mart and yes, it's a bitch to find alternatives, but oh so worth it.

    1. Re:Communist Countries by skoskav · · Score: 1
      To be pedantic, I wouldn't classify China as communist. The irony in the summary was not lost on me either:

      [...] enforced by the country's authoritarian Communist Party government.

      Communism entails a minimal or absent state, because it would supposedly become redundant once all class struggle has disappeared. China instead has a massive and suppressive authoritarian state, mixing capitalist and nationalistic ideas into socialist ones. They're in no way progressing towards communism, but they are hovering close to national socialism.

    2. Re:Communist Countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >They're in no way progressing towards communism

      Nobody is because utopias don't exist except in fiction and political ideologies that mask their totalitarian bent.

    3. Re:Communist Countries by lgw · · Score: 1

      China is communist. Your idea of "communism" is imaginary. "Real" means "as it exists in the world". Real communism is a brutal totalitarian dictatorship (which can coexist quite well with corrupt capitalism, as it turns out).

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    4. Re:Communist Countries by skoskav · · Score: 1

      I partly disagree. There are more labels to the various socialist politics than just communism, just like how e.g. libertarianism and fascism are both very different implementations of capitalism. Communism as originally described was never implemented, except for in name. It's a bit like how North Korea or GDR calling themselves democratic doesn't make them especially democratic, and they shouldn't be held as examples of democracies.

      I can totally see your point though. Communism can be placed at opposite ends on the authoritarian spectrum, depending on whether you look at the literary description of a stateless utopia or all the socialist totalitarian states that claimed to be communist.

      To the point of it all, I just want things to be labeled unambiguously. Call China, say, totalitarian.

    5. Re:Communist Countries by lgw · · Score: 1

      China is really communist, is the thing, as was Stalin's regime. That's what communism really looks like in the real world. Really.

      Communism killed 160 million people. That's what communism really is. We don't need to hear about "oh, but it could be done better". So, what only 30 million killed next iteration? "Communism" is as forever tainted as little mustaches that fit under a gas mask.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    6. Re:Communist Countries by skoskav · · Score: 1

      Again, you're equating what was promised with what people got. History is strongly suggesting that communism as originally defined cannot be implemented successfully, but it doesn't magically change the words that were printed when defining it.

  20. How this happens... Cynical. by fish_in_the_c · · Score: 1

    Though a series of 'initiatives' and 'empowerment sessions' and some 'on going improvements' those who had enough clout to actually stop a project important to upper management will find there 'performance' is now very poor @ review time until they leave or are forced to leave , the project Dragonfly will become project Panda and get built in about 3 years, sans the ugly publicity, everyone working on the project will have NDA's properly signed so that if they so much as speak of it , even at internal events they will be fired on the spot.

    --
    âoeTolerance applies only to persons, but never to truth. Intolerance applies only to truth, but never to persons.
  21. Why is Everyone so Against This by Paxtez · · Score: 1

    Why is Google super evil for considering doing this? Yes a censored internet sucks, but a smarter search engine would allow the people to China to access at least a little bit more information. In addition taking money out of China's economy also seems like a good thing. The alternative would be: they do nothing, and things stay exactly the same as it is now.

    China certainly isn't going to change their mind if Google search didn't come there, so nothing would change. A 0.1% chance of doing good while making money seems better than 0% good and no extra money.

    1. Re:Why is Everyone so Against This by DarkOx · · Score: 2

      That is not how it really works though.

      Right now its plainly obvious to everyone that
      1) They don't enjoy the information access the rest of the world does
      2) They government is responsible
      3) Things are better elsewhere

      When you give people a 'good enough' alternative there are those who might believe:

      1) The have access to most information, what is censored is really just awful stuff they'd have no interest in
      2) The government is helping them or at least not hindering
      3) Things are probably like this everywhere.

      Right now with the Great Firewall and crapy Bidu; the Part has a tight grip on the internet - but some things slip thru their fingers. Letting Google et al play might seem like a loosening of that grip but really it will be a more insidious form of control; and the people who NEED to find ways around will find few allies to help them.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
  22. find new employees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm surprised Google does not simply fire these unruly employees and replace them with ones willing to take orders and make what thier bosses tell them to make.

  23. I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I wonder if they will now do what IBM did during WWII when they helped germany exterminate Jews. They established a company in another country in order to hide their involvement. It will always be about money.

  24. Sure they did by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 2

    They publicly stopped it, will rename it and swear to secrecy the next group of folks who will be working on it.

    No way they will give up that market so easily.

  25. The want to help Communism is strong by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    A new project under a team that knows to keep secrets.
    Go full Communist in China under a new team.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  26. Just might save it by hdyoung · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I really hope that Google employees pay attention and complete the killing of this project regardless of whatever it morphs into. They're basically saving the company from itself.

    First off, I completely agree with the human-rights angle here. China isn't the worst player on the planet. Not by a long shot. However, they are far from being the best. In the long run, it's better for Google to stay away from supporting Chinese internet. History would NOT judge them kindly for taking part in something that's widely recognized as a pretty oppressive system. Their leadership is seriously blinded by short term profit if they don't see this.

    However, I seriously question the possibility of ANY profit from this project, period. Who in their right mind thinks that China would turn internet search over to a non-Chinese company? really? reeeealllllly? Google executives appear to have forgotten that China is only half capitalist. The other half is iron-fisted state-directed economics. Okay, the Chinese government MIGHT be willing to cede some extreme minority of the search market to Google, but only in exchange for complete control, the source code, and every other piece of tech that Google has ever developed. In exchange for about 1% of their search market, I'm sure. What a colossally dumb idea. This is what the Google executives were making a priority? Really?

    It's just one more data point showing that top executives are mostly regular or slightly-above-average schmoes who lucked into the position. They aren't geniuses and they don't have any kind of extraordinary ability. They are successful business types who were in the right place at the right time. Nothing more.

  27. Re:Communist by lgw · · Score: 1

    A communist (who believes in a highly regulated economy, where the interests of the community exceeds the interests of the individual)

    Communism is a brutal dictatorship where the state takes everything and leaves you nothing. Not sure what that has to do with your parenthetical.

    I expect the communist economic model is holding the country back.

    Ya think?

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  28. But he did a great job with Damore! by aberglas · · Score: 1

    The Damore incident showed Pichai was incompetent as well as arrogant. A dangerous mix.

  29. China == Embrace, extend, extinguish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China:

    - Embrace a new technology as long as the non-Chinese company partners with a Chinese company owns 50% and gets the intellectual property rights
    - Extend knowledge of how to run the business around the technology to a Chinese company
    - Extinguish the partnership, while the newly trained Chinese company builds its own business to compete globally with the non-Chinese company

    training the competition is a bad proposition

  30. Privacy team will be fired by ayesnymous · · Score: 1

    They will start it up again once the complainers are canned.