Slashdot Mirror


Hyped AR Tech Firm Blippar Collapses Into Administration (bbc.com)

One of the great hopes of the UK tech sector, Blippar, has collapsed into administration over a funding row. BBC News reports: The augmented reality firm was co-founded by Ambarish Mitra, and its technology was used in a partnership with the BBC's Planet Earth II series. Blippar was one of the UK's tech "Unicorns" -- start-up businesses that are worth $1bn or more. Mr Mitra became a brand ambassador for the UK to promote British innovation around the world. He claimed to have founded his business from a Delhi slum, leading him to be dubbed a "real-life Slumdog Millionaire". However, the Financial Times ran a profile disputing many of Mr Mitra's claims about his birth and his business development.

It seemed to be one of the brightest stars in London's tech firmament, raising big sums from American and Malaysian backers who bought into the message that augmented reality was the next big thing. So why has the Blippar bubble burst? A few years ago it did appear to have something groundbreaking -- you could point its phone app at everyday objects and they would animate into action, give you useful information or serve up an advert.

But the business appeared to depend on a very fickle set of customers -- advertising agencies wanting to use its augmented reality tools in their campaigns. Not only are much bigger firms offering similar technology but big brands seem to have concluded that it's a gimmick whose time may already have passed. What's more Blippar suffered from a lack of focus, trying out a range of ideas -- making an app for Google Glass, opening a Silicon Valley office, launching a facial recognition service.

65 comments

  1. What's with these crap names by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    A random collection of characters would be superior to suggesting that you will be a blip at best.

    Has anyone ever heard of these guys? Blipper indeed.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:What's with these crap names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's with these crap names?

      Corporate branding, an easily trademarked word which won't have been used, and in keeping with all of the variations like Flickr, Imgur, and who knows what else.

      I agree it's a dumb name, but from a legal point, I can see how an invented word is just easier for corporations to deal with.

      I'm sure there were focus groups and everything. :-P

    2. Re:What's with these crap names by cayenne8 · · Score: 0

      Actually upon my first reading of the title, and skimming the article, I saw AR company in the UK, and I was puzzled why they wold pick the UK to build rifles.....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    3. Re:What's with these crap names by ctilsie242 · · Score: 1

      I can't think of any other company which could make the back of a Lucky Charms cereal box be animated when viewed with a smartphone.

      I don't see how this can make big bucks though.

    4. Re:What's with these crap names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might be interested to know that the UK does pump out a lot of rifles and guns. This isn't some gun free haven like slashdot might have you believe. Our laws are roundabout in line with a lot of US states mostly.

    5. Re:What's with these crap names by stealth_finger · · Score: 0

      You might be interested to know that the UK does pump out a lot of rifles and guns. This isn't some gun free haven like slashdot might have you believe. Our laws are roundabout in line with a lot of US states mostly.

      No they aren't. At all.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    6. Re:What's with these crap names by cayenne8 · · Score: 0

      You might be interested to know that the UK does pump out a lot of rifles and guns. This isn't some gun free haven like slashdot might have you believe. Our laws are roundabout in line with a lot of US states mostly.

      No they aren't. At all.

      Yeah, I'm with you...as far as I know in the UK, even if you 'can' privately own at home, semi-auto rifles/handguns....

      I doubt seriously over there that you can:

      1. Own all guns you want, without having to register them with any government entity.

      2. Don't have to apply to have any sort of license to own any firearms you wish.

      3. Can apply for and readily get a permit to carry concealed handguns if you wish.

      4. Have private sales between private individuals, where there is no paperwork or government intrusion required.

      5. Can manufacture your own firearms, and not have to serialize them, nor register them with any govt. entity.

      Now, one thing I will give Europe and many places outside the US, they do understand the value of saving ones 'hearing', and noise pollution, and over there as I understand it, if you ARE able to own and use firearms, you can readily get silencers over there....they aren't treated as the "dangerous" item they are here in the US, where you have to jump through paperwork hoops and long waiting times plus pay $200 tax stamp for each one.....

      If this is not true about the UK and the greater EU...please let me know where I"m wrong.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    7. Re:What's with these crap names by mjwx · · Score: 1

      A random collection of characters would be superior to suggesting that you will be a blip at best.

      Has anyone ever heard of these guys? Blipper indeed.

      It's even worse... Blippar... Which is an absolutely terrible name for a UK company as that word does not fit comfortably into any UK accent. Company deserves to die for that alone.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  2. British words are funny by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 4, Funny

    >> (something no one has ever heard of) has collapsed into "administration" over a funding "row"

    Better watch out for all the depressed hedge fund managers jumping in front of lorries or taking the lift and jumping out of the first floor window onto the concrete below. It's all a bit sticky.

    1. Re:British words are funny by Tapewolf · · Score: 1

      "Gone into administration" means that a third party has been appointed to oversee the emergency rescue/shutdown of the company. I'm not sure how that's less intuitive than saying "Gone into chapter 7"...

    2. Re:British words are funny by Fly+Swatter · · Score: 1

      Yea the British words annoy me, specifically always calling things a 'row', but it is a less sensational headline to just say a company we never heard of went 'bankrupt', less clicky click baits by confused non-british-persons.

    3. Re:British words are funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oi, are you taking the piss there, you cheeky cobber?

    4. Re:British words are funny by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Yea the British words annoy me, specifically always calling things a 'row', but it is a less sensational headline to just say a company we never heard of went 'bankrupt', less clicky click baits by confused non-british-persons.

      'Row' is a bit of Tabloidese, it's nice and short compared with dispute, argument, disagreement or whatever, plus it sounds a bit fighty.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    5. Re:British words are funny by _merlin · · Score: 1

      Voluntary administration is not the same thing as bankruptcy. This is slashdot - being correct matters.

    6. Re:British words are funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While we're picking at nits, entering voluntary administration is not the same as being insolvent.

  3. Sheesh, you just can't win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's more Blippar suffered from a lack of focus, trying out a range of ideas -- making an app for Google Glass, opening a Silicon Valley office, launching a facial recognition service.

    A startup, trying out a range of ideas, all closely related to their core mission? Well, no wonder they failed.

    1. Re:Sheesh, you just can't win by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      When you're a small startup you concentrate on one thing and do it well. You don't throw money at a wall and see where it sticks. Sure , when you're a multi billion dollar company like Google then you can blow all the money you like on pie in the sky, but when you've got bank loans and/or vencture capitalists on your back you need to make damn sure you concentrate all your resources on producing a working product.

    2. Re:Sheesh, you just can't win by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      When you're a small startup you concentrate on one thing and do it well. You don't throw money at a wall and see where it sticks. Sure , when you're a multi billion dollar company like Google then you can blow all the money you like on pie in the sky, but when you've got bank loans and/or vencture capitalists on your back you need to make damn sure you concentrate all your resources on producing a working product.

      In any other industry, a 'small startup' wouldn't be valued at a billion dollars, and wouldn't give the founders anything like the same delusions of grandeur.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  4. The only things these firms have in common... by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    ... with Unicorns is that they're both fantasy.

    Just who are the clueless financial fuckwits who value these companies? Whoever they are I do hope they're not involved in managing my pension pot.

    1. Re:The only things these firms have in common... by sheramil · · Score: 1

      ... with Unicorns is that they're both fantasy.

      A unicorn company is really a donkey with a dead carrot tied to its forehead.

      http://pbfcomics.com/comics/the-last-unicorns/

  5. "the Financial Times ran a profile" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "the Financial Times ran a profile disputing many of Mr Mitra's claims"

    And you're just going to leave that there and assume no-one cares to read even a snippet of it.
    Thanks. Good work.

    1. Re:"the Financial Times ran a profile" by David_Hart · · Score: 1
    2. Re:"the Financial Times ran a profile" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The link in the article is broken. Did the poster even bother to click it ?!

      Here's a (working) link to an FT summary of the business a year ago. Because someone has to do the Editor's job round here

      https://ftalphaville.ft.com/2018/02/19/2198886/whats-up-at-blippar/

  6. Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is not enough advertising in my life. I could have used more, better, immersive advertising.

    1. Re:Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would also like to point out my phone to every day objects see advertisements of them. Could one even get a monthly subscription of them for nominal 9,99£ price and a opportunity to give away location information and all the data in phone?

  7. Can we get normal super-summaries by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

    Can we go back to one sentence summaries (or maybe even multisentence summaries) that aren't just verbatum pulled from the article. For instance, "Blippar, once valued at the unicorn level of over a billion dollars, is bankrupt because they couldn't get more VC funding". You could even go on "Two hypothesized causes are that AR is no longer a technology VCs believe will be exciting, and Blippar hopped on every bandwagon tangentially related to AR because they lacked direction."

    How hard is that?

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
    1. Re:Can we get normal super-summaries by XXongo · · Score: 1
      The summary seemed ok to me.

      Only thing that puzzled me was the phrase "collapsed into administration". What does that even mean? Their new product line helps administrators?

      but a commentator upstream said it's a British phrase, meaning a third-party administrator is appointed and now running the show to avoid bankruptcy.

    2. Re:Can we get normal super-summaries by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      It's literally the first line of the article (or the caption under the picture at the top of the article.) If it's going to be copied, at least be honest enough to put it in blockquotes.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    3. Re: Can we get normal super-summaries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like chapter 11, but with outside experts in managing failing companies brought in to protect creditors. It tends to either end in shuttering all or part of the company, with creditors getting somewhere between nothing and something back, sale of all of part, or very occasionally a restructuring that works. There are various scales of creditors, and small businesses that have supplied goods and services often end up doing badly out of it, which can send other companies to the wall too.

  8. Wait, what do you call the first floor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What else would you call it?

    1. Re:Wait, what do you call the first floor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The second floor. After all, the first floor is at ground level.....

    2. Re:Wait, what do you call the first floor? by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      Arrays of floors start at ZERO!

    3. Re:Wait, what do you call the first floor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, this makes a smooth transition to negative numbers for basement levels.

  9. VR/AR by 110010001000 · · Score: 2

    VR and AR are offering solutions to problems that no one has.

    1. Re:VR/AR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're living in the past, old man.

    2. Re:VR/AR by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      That is patently false. Both VR and AR are successfully being used in business applications right now, and many average citizens could benefit from the technology as well if it were more affordable. What is probably if not provably true is that it's too soon to sell it to the general public, because neither the utility nor the novelty justifies the price.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:VR/AR by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Oh let me guess: car manufacturers are using AR so the workers don't have to consult paper manuals when building/servicing cars? They always trot that one out. I am pretty sure that is all they can think of. Here Bob, put this $5000 AR headset on so you don't have to walk away to consult a $100 paper book. As an added bonus you get a headache.

    4. Re:VR/AR by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      VR Fanboys are still out there, and hype it up when they are not throwing up from motion sickness.

    5. Re:VR/AR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can personally see the value in AR. Googles 'translate' app is a good example. Hold the camera up to a package and it'll in place translate the words for you. I find it very useful when dealing with Japanese writing.

      VR....well, I can't see that ever being anything beyond an amusement. Maybe in some sorts of training exercises, but it's got so far to go until it gets to that level, it's not really worth considering at the moment. And an amusement that makes a non-trivial percentage of the users physically ill is only ever going to have limited adoption.

    6. Re:VR/AR by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Oh let me guess: car manufacturers are using AR so the workers don't have to consult paper manuals when building/servicing cars?

      That's a thing, and it's a real thing. As you would know if you ever serviced cars, going back and forth between the vehicle and the documentation can eat up significant amounts of time. But there are lots of other ways in which AR could be a benefit while working with your hands. What if the current measurement from a digital caliper would show up on your display? What if you could simply look at a part number and have the application pop up? I can do this all day.

      Here Bob, put this $5000 AR headset on so you don't have to walk away to consult a $100 paper book.

      Paper documentation sets for many vehicles run into the hundreds of dollars. It's true for something as humble as a Subaru Impreza, because Subaru has multi-volume documentation sets. Paper manuals are on their way out, however. They won't even exist much longer.

      As an added bonus you get a headache.

      That's a real problem, if true. I haven't used any of the latest kit, so I can't speak to that.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:VR/AR by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Definitely a real thing. I saw it in the marketing brochure.

    8. Re:VR/AR by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      You don't need AR for that. The words are "Prawn Flavored".

    9. Re:VR/AR by drinkypoo · · Score: 0

      Definitely a real thing. I saw it in the marketing brochure.

      Sounds like that's the closest you've been to auto maintenance. Let us know when you have some relevant experience so we can start paying attention to your opinions.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:VR/AR by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      No I see auto mechanics walking around with $5000 AR goggles quite a bit.

    11. Re:VR/AR by drinkypoo · · Score: 0

      No I see auto mechanics walking around with $5000 AR goggles quite a bit.

      Wow, you've seen a mechanic! Clearly you're a qualified source on what would be useful to one! Thanks for making Slashdot great again!

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re: VR/AR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's used in medical, engineering and defense applications now, such as allowing engineers to visualise flow rates in pipes by looking at them, assisting surgeons, and overlaying targets onto terrain for pilots, or for training. There's also interest for visualisation for museums or for scholarly research. What there isn't currently is a really good mass market for it, at least for VR, as headsets are constricting and good ones expensive, except for some particular leisure activities. There's more mileage in AR in everyday life, I expect, as you can use that in the street without being run over by a bus.

    13. Re:VR/AR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the yet again collapse of this industry I think you are living in the past. AR and VR has some uses, but currently they just aren't enough to be commercially viable. Even the successful players in the industry are barely surviving. The Tech needs a lot more advancement and the cost a lot more reduction, until then it will be all hype with very little actual "reality"

    14. Re:VR/AR by DFurno2003 · · Score: 0

      In what way could average citizens benefit from VR/AR? What need does it fulfill? I can't think of any.

    15. Re:VR/AR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No I see auto mechanics walking around with $5000 AR goggles quite a bit.

      Those are just $5 safety glasses.

  10. No, that's how they *make* money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Literally.

    Because you can squeeze the work force only so much, until they can't afford the products that they make anymore.

    The only way to keep going, is to create imaginary value. Via stocks.
    But even these collapse every 30 years, when they drift too far from reality to be believable. Unless you artificially put a cork on that volcano. And then you get a market "crisis". Which is nice, if you are the one scooping up the real value... like Gold Man-Sacks did the last time. But you can't scoop up imaginary value.

    So again, the only way to keep going, is to come up with imaginary valuations... but for vapor companies too! So you can boom and bust them, and make money on every up and every down, scooping off the investments of others, but not busting the entire thing.

    I call them vapor capitalists.

  11. well then ... by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    ... I mean administrators do kind of reek of failure but really, this isn't called for ...

    (Yes, I know it's Brit speak. It was a joke. I'll show myself out.)

  12. Blimey! by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 2

    So why has the Blippar bubble burst?

    Beginning to believe that the Blippar bubble burst because it was being blatently balderdash, bless your heart!

    1. Re:Blimey! by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      So why has the Blippar bubble burst?

      Beginning to believe that the Blippar bubble burst because it was being blatently balderdash, bless your heart!

      Blatantly bollocks.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    2. Re:Blimey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bingo.

  13. Blip? by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    It was a blip on the radar? I just had to say that

  14. What? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    "...Collapses Into Administration"

    Wat does that mean? Is that similar to bankruptcy or Chapter 11?

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    1. Re:What? by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Administration in that context in the UK is when you've fucked up your company too bad and other people have to come in to liquify your assets etc and pay as much of your debt as possible because you can't be trusted to do it yourself. Dunno who pays them though.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    2. Re:What? by balbeir · · Score: 1

      I think it's something like a black hole, just not as black

    3. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When a company becomes insolvent (unable to meet its obligations), the directors must immediately cease trading and appoint administrators. (An external firm of accountants and lawyers that specialise in fixing or winding-up companies.) The company is then known as being in receivership/administration. If the administrators/receivers find that the company was trading whilst insolvent, the directors become personally liable for the debts of the company in addition to criminal penalties.

      If the directors believe the company will become insolvent, they can call in administrators before reaching that point, which is known as "voluntary administration".

      Creditors can also have a company placed into administration/receivership in an attempt to have their overdue debts settled by petitioning the courts.

      Receivers/administrators take control of the company and work as fast as they can to determine the best way of resolving the insolvency: can the business trade out of its predicament with an injection of working capital, or can it be restructured? If that is the case then the business will continue to trade with the administrators assuming liability for all debts and obligations until they determine the company is back in a position where the original directors can resume.

      Those circumstances are rare though and most often administrators liquidate the company's assets, with creditors receiving pennies on the dollar/pound or nothing at all depending upon their ranking.

      My brother worked for a company that entered voluntary administration earlier in the year. (Which ensured that the company had enough capital to ensure that the employees would get paid their entitlements.) The administrators immediately ceased all operations while they ran over the books and surveyed the operations and assets to determine value. After 72 hours they decided to continue operating the business with a skeleton workforce while liquidating non-vital assets and seeking a buyer. Lots of people lost their jobs, with my brother being one of the last few to be let go. All creditors were paid in full, employees received their entitlements plus generous severance packages and in the end the business' major immovable asset was sold. A rare "good" outcome.

    4. Re:What? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Administration in that context in the UK is when you've fucked up your company too bad and other people have to come in to liquify your assets etc and pay as much of your debt as possible because you can't be trusted to do it yourself. Dunno who pays them though.

      Ahhh, thank you. I figured it was something along those lines but I appreciate the clarification.

      It's similar to what the government here is doing to Trump's 'charitable' foundation, which was charitable only to him.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  15. What a surprise by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 1

    AR, AI, VR - synonymous of hype.

    1. Re:What a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. It's much like Turbo in the 80's. Sure, it indicated a type of car engine, but it went on to mean 'Cool' or 'Awesome' so everything had the word Turbo on it, even beverages.

      The term AI is starting to turn up all over the place, and it just seems silly. When AI is AI we will use the term correctly.

      I also remember VR/AR from 25 years ago. Other then the screen/software resolution it was pretty much the same, although the headsets today are about 50-75% smaller. The vomiting has not changed at all though.

  16. That's the beauty of the term by Solandri · · Score: 1

    They don't exist, but everyone wants to think they do.

  17. So, in other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They turned off the blip tap.