Slashdot Mirror


UK Chip-Maker Arm is Working on an AI-Powered Smart Chip That Can Tell if You Smell (newscientist.com)

UK chip-maker Arm, better known for developing the hardware that powers most smartphones, is working on a new generation of smart chips that embed artificial intelligence inside devices. One of these chips is being taught to smell. From a report: The idea is that the chips will be small and cheap enough to be built into clothing, allowing an AI to keep tabs on your BO throughout the day. Arm also wants to add the chips to food packaging to monitor freshness. The e-noses are part of a project called PlasticArmPit, in which Arm is developing smart chips made from thin sheets of plastic. Each chip will have eight different sensors and a built-in machine learning circuit. It will look like a piece of cling-film with bits stuck to it, says James Myers at Arm. "PlasticArmPit will be the first application of machine learning in plastic electronics."

Smells are made up of different combinations and concentrations of gases. The sensors on the chip will detect different chemicals in the air and the AI will take that complex data and identify it as a particular whiff. The chip will then score the smell. If it is in the armpit of your shirt, it will tell you the strength of your body odour from 1 to 5, says Myers. "It's the job of the machine learning to collect and interpret all the data and then alert the user if action is needed."

107 comments

  1. On the BO railroad it goes off all the time! by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    On the BO railroad it goes off all the time!

    1. Re:On the BO railroad it goes off all the time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Must be an Arm and Hammer chip that dispenses baking soda when needed...

  2. Don't worry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Apple are already working on a new deodorant called iStink.

    1. Re: Don't worry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Snicker. I think there must be some outraged SJW types who actually have a gene that prevents BO who will be all up in arms about this

    2. Re:Don't worry... by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

      Apple are already working on a new deodorant called iStink.

      Why not iStick instead of iStink. Not to be confused with iceDick, a never-before-revealed weapon due to appear on the final season of Game of Thrones.

      --
      The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
  3. AI by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

    How is this "AI"? What "complex data"? The sensors are simple. The program would look like if (concentration_of_gas1 > threshold_a && concentration_of_gas2 > threshold_b) {you_stink=true;}

    1. Re:AI by olsmeister · · Score: 1

      It says it gives you an odor score on a scale of 1 to 5. You cannot do that with standard programming, it requires AI to categorize various concentration levels into various stink levels.

    2. Re:AI by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      How is this "AI"? What "complex data"? The sensors are simple. The program would look like if (concentration_of_gas1 > threshold_a && concentration_of_gas2 > threshold_b) {you_stink=true;}

      But ... but .. different chemicals! Different!

      We can't handle that without AI?!?!?

    3. Re:AI by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      if (concentration_of_gas1 > threshold_a && concentration_of_gas2 > threshold_b) {your_stink_level=1;}
      else if (concentration_of_gas1 > threshold_c && concentration_of_gas2 > threshold_d) {your_stink_level=2;}
      else if (you_read_slashdot) {stink_level=5;}

    4. Re:AI by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

      I also forgot there were eight sensors. We can't handle eight sensors with my approach. Clearly deep-learning neural nets are required here. Possibly blockchains as well.

    5. Re:AI by olsmeister · · Score: 2

      Stink level 5! Achievement unlocked!

    6. Re:AI by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      I ran my program on myself and I got a stink level of 100. Clearly there is a bug somewhere.

    7. Re:AI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's still possible without AI. A table of weights per gas, and categorise based on a sum of products. More interestingly would be if it analyses combinations of gases and how gases cancel out or overpower others, given that for example perfume sometimes uses urine as an ingredient so whether that is a good or bad smell very much depends on what other gases are present.

    8. Re:AI by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Sorcery!

    9. Re:AI by Rockoon · · Score: 0

      uhhh... what?

      Lets bring reality to this table of yours.

      The reality is that you are not a programmer, or at least not an experienced one, and that you are talking out your ass making statements that are absurdly untrue.

      Yet here you are, acting like an expert. Fuck off you dishonest fuck.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    10. Re:AI by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      maybe yours is set on binary?

    11. Re:AI by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Whoosh

    12. Re:AI by 110010001000 · · Score: 2

      That was it! Pair programming works.

    13. Re:AI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even easier than that...

      Stink = (Owner.MemberOf( DevOps ) ? true : false);

    14. Re:AI by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How is this "AI"?

      The problem is, you use a different definition of AI to most journalists. You probably grew up in the 20th Century and was first exposed to AI as a term by science fiction authors or theorists to describe machine sentience.

      At sometime in the 21st century it began to mean nothing more than an algorithm where a computer program makes a decision based on IO. You can complain, or argue that this isn't AI- and historically you would be right; however, this isn't the first time words have changed meaning based on being used "incorrectly" enough times that the "incorrect" meaning became the "correct" meaning (if the majority of people use a word in a certain way, it becomes the new meaning- English is a living language).

      It's easy to point to other examples. Prior to the 20th century "Awesome" was pretty much synonymous with the word "Awful". People probably started using the word to mean it's current meaning ironically (like some people said "bad" to mean good in the 80's- or how kids in Britain might say "wicked" to mean "cool") - eventually the ironic meaning became the mainstream meaning.

      Use the word decimate and you'll probably get a lot of people tell you that the word means "to remove 1/10th". And prior to about 20 years ago, that's what most people would have suggested it meant- nowadays people assume the opposite, that it means to completely destroy something. It was used "incorrectly" for so long that the incorrect meaning became the correct meaning.

      People are always whining about the term "AI" on articles on Slashdot... well, guess what... the fact that you have to complain about it every single day means that you're on the losing side of this one. AI doesn't mean what you think it does anymore. It no longer has anything to do with machine sentience.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    15. Re:AI by JMJimmy · · Score: 2

      My god man, use a switch!

    16. Re:AI by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      How is this "AI"? What "complex data"? The sensors are simple. The program would look like if (concentration_of_gas1 > threshold_a && concentration_of_gas2 > threshold_b) {you_stink=true;}

      The A.I. part comes into play when it gives you the notification. It will learn your personality, and determine if telling you "Dude, you stink!" is going to hurt your feelings, thereby switching to "It may be beneficial for you to apply some deodorant in the near future, but only if you want to."

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    17. Re: AI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the 3D printing, Vlad.

    18. Re:AI by omnichad · · Score: 2

      But it's so hard to program with wireless controllers.

    19. Re:AI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      awesome (adj.)

      1590s, "profoundly reverential," from awe (n.) + -some (1). Meaning "inspiring awe or dread" is from 1670s; weakened colloquial sense of "impressive, very good" is recorded by 1961 and was in vogue from after c. 1980. Related: Awesomely; awesomeness.

    20. Re:AI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey it's better than using a touchscreen keyboard on the 3DS......

    21. Re:AI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe they can work smell into the new biometric login

      "Ah yes, my smelly master, you have attained local root access, but you do not have a strong enough odor for global root."

    22. Re:AI by thecatt · · Score: 1

      perfume sometimes uses urine as an ingredient so whether that is a good or bad smell very much depends on what other gases are present.

      It really doesn't. People are just very good at convincing themselves that if they paid a lot of money for something it must not reek.

    23. Re:AI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My guess is they used AI to analyze the chemical data collected by the sensors in order to develop an accurate model with minimal false positives or negatives.

    24. Re:AI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "sometime in the 21st century it began to mean nothing more than an algorithm where a computer program makes a decision based on IO"

      That is simply not true. A machine doesn't need sentience to be "A.I.", that much is true. But if you are building and training neural nets - for example - you're doing A.I. If you are simply testing if sensor_data > SENSOR_LIMIT, then you are not doing A.I.

    25. Re:AI by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      decimate used to mean executing one in ten soldiers as a punishment for desertion.

    26. Re:AI by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Yes we need leading edge technology for computer to do Math.

      It reminds me 20 years ago while working in a College Computer Lab.
      A student asked me if I had a calculator.
      Thinking that he wanted a TI-96 Graphing calculator (because many of the math classes were centered around that calculator) I had to tell me I didn't have one.
      He was a bit perplex and a bit desperate, because it will take him a lot longer to work out his assignment.
      I asked him what he needed a calculator for.
      "You know, Adding, Subtracting, Multiplying and diving"
      I then asked why didn't he use the calculator app on the PC.
      He didn't know about that.
      So I showed him the app. which blew his mind.
      Also on a side note, he was working an assignment on an Application Called Maple. Which is a rather advance Math application where it could just as easily handle the simple math problems by typing the formula into the command line and hitting enter.
      So I showed him that too, but that just pushed him over the edge.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    27. Re:AI by ljw1004 · · Score: 1

      How is this "AI"? What "complex data"? The sensors are simple. The program would look like if (concentration_of_gas1 > threshold_a && concentration_of_gas2 > threshold_b) {you_stink=true;}

      I think you've answered your own question. The program won't look like that, because the cost and effort to tune all the "if" statements and thresholds correctly, and the likelihood of developers getting them good enough, is vanishingly small.

      Instead the program will look like "take 1000 inputs which are kind of fuzzy because we haven't bothered to classify which precise input corresponds to which precise gas and indeed we don't have to. Feed it into a neural network which was previously trained on a set of training data and is characterized by about 1000 parameters. Read off the output."

      In the computer industry we now call the second approach "AI" because (1) no developer sat down and wrote an algorithm or design procedure that even remotely resembles what you described, (2) no one on the team really has a clue what the weights represent in the neural network or why they're good ones or how it works; they just treat it as a black box and accept the output, (3) its weights/connections were developed through training data. "AI" is a pretty good descriptive term because (2) and (3) also apply to the human brain and human intelligence.

    28. Re:AI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At sometime in the 21st century it began to mean nothing more than an algorithm where a computer program makes a decision based on IO. You can complain, or argue that this isn't AI- and historically you would be right;

      That is questionable since AI was a category of algorithms already during the 80's outside of academia. As available computing power and capacity made it possible, new and old ideas from computer science and wider mathematics got integrated into that category for practical applications like machine vision, games and control systems.
        Outside of the field of writing software and engineering systems things may have been different of course.

    29. Re:AI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nowadays the only command line people know is the browser addressbar. Or worse, the Google input field. It's pretty dumb but it does process math equations.

    30. Re:AI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using a text's own definitions of terms is a basic reading skill. It's childish to expect everybody else to use one's own definitions (that literalists often aren't even able to spell out because they naturalize them). If you're unable to abstract from words, you'll never get to the interesting part, the part where the debate is about ideas not semantics.

    31. Re:AI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where used means utilized, mean means think, executing means doing, soldier means anyone who works for pay, punishment means paying blood-money, and desertion means stepping out of line.

    32. Re:AI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't have the slightest idea how your olfactory system works.

    33. Re:AI by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Let me explain:

      This is 2018. The word "software" has fallen out of favour with news media and has been replaced with two terms; "app" and "AI".

      Since the software on this dedicated chip likely doesn't fit the minimum criteria to be called an "app" (isn't downloaded from an app store, and doesn't present a GUI), it must therefore be called an "AI".

      Yeah, me too.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    34. Re: AI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think the sensors produce a clean intensity value on some given odor dimension like everyone is thinking. I expect noisy set of signals tuned to some class of odor (from each sensor), that, to the casual observer, looks like random noise.

  4. Not a chipmaker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not a chip maker and never has been nor is it UK company, It's now owned buy the Chinese IIRC

    1. Re:Not a chipmaker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Global Headquarters: 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge, CB1 9NJ, United Kingdom

    2. Re: Not a chipmaker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That might be their new address as of the new year. I doubt they will publish an address until the move is finalized

    3. Re:Not a chipmaker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The majority ownership was just sold to China from Japan. ARM has been owned by Asia for several years now...

  5. That sounds easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So it always returns true? That should work for most of the /. folks around...

  6. Will the French version... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will the French version evaluate the odors of perfume / cologne and determine whether they're sufficiently strong to overpower the BO? I've never thought that strategy was particularly effective, but judging by my experience on the Paris Metro the French believe in it.

    1. Re:Will the French version... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 0

      Deodorants are toxic, body odor contains natural pheromones. People who stink a bit are sexier and healthier.

    2. Re:Will the French version... by PPH · · Score: 1

      body odor contains natural pheromones

      Fresh body odors do. Not the ones that bacteria have had a day or two to work on since the last shower.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    3. Re:Will the French version... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take a shower you filthy disgusting fool, no one likes your stench

    4. Re:Will the French version... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll impose it on you, like it or not...

    5. Re:Will the French version... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, tell that to the HR harridans who refuse to work with your new developer because she doesn't follow Americans norms (i.e. soaking self in antiperspirant).

      FYI, it is an uphill battle on all fronts, and HR will not be of any help at all

    6. Re:Will the French version... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Fire the HR people who whine, hire non-US-born workers to replace them. People with HR degrees are like Kleenex -- easily thrown away and replaced.

  7. I Will Order 50 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    One for each of my IT students.

  8. Where ... by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    ... is the Monty Python foot icon?

    1. Re:Where ... by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      The chip beeped too much when it came near, so it's off taking a shower.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  9. Beedeebeedeebeedeebee... You smell like ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now we are automating neurosis? What a fucking world!

  10. My dog has no nose! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This reminds me of an old Monty Python joke:

    Man 1: My dog has no nose!
    Man 2: How does he smell?
    Man 1: Terrible!

  11. Re:Not UK Anymore by damicatz · · Score: 1

    I wasn't aware that Japan was part of China now.

  12. Big hit by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

    Should be a big hit with IBM management.

  13. Re:Not UK Anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Japanese would probably resist the notion of being part of China, wouldn't they? These smelly-pads should probably not only detect odor in some meaningless scale but detect infection, pheromones and such. You probably want those smells that you use to lure unsuspecting partners to have sex with you from a problematic bacterial colony that works for the opposite goal.

  14. Oh, ffs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whoever thought this up - Just fuck the hell off.

  15. Re:Not UK Anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Congratulations. In your racist rant you failed to even name the right country. To fact check you... the company headquarters are still in the UK, the CEO is British (but living in California) and the company owning it is actually Japanese. I doubt Japan would be pleased being confused with China.

  16. Re: Not UK Anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can I put one in my a$$ to monitor my gas and automatically post to face book when I make a record setting stinky

  17. Re: Not UK Anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What kind of fucking moron are you?

    China and Japan are practically on the same relationship level as they were in WWII.

  18. Because it seems to be necessary to state by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ARM Holdings is a UK based business owned by a Japanese Conglomerate, not a Chinese business.

  19. Cancer and other illnesses by sycodon · · Score: 2

    Cancer can and has been detected through odors by dogs.

    Seems like that would be a much better use of this technology than would be just telling you if you stink.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    1. Re:Cancer and other illnesses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just don't get modern western civilization.

      It would make more sense to spend $1 billion on cancer research than a new football stadium, but there you go.

      It would make more sense to honor and reward people for creating breakthrough medical technology than for hitting a ball with a stick, but there you go.

      If people paid 1/100th the attention to the environment as they do to celebrity gossip, we'd be living in an ecological utopia, but there you go.

      Society has its priorities screwed up and we're all going to die because of it. Have a nice day.

  20. It looks for the presence ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    ... of a nose.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    1. Re:It looks for the presence ... by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Hi Dad!

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    2. Re:It looks for the presence ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      My son. My only son.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  21. Split by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On top of that, ARM itself was never a purely British company, but a joint venture between Archimedes, Apple and VLSI, mainly to design the CPU for the Newton.

  22. Just be sure... by kiehlster · · Score: 1

    It also tells you if you put too much perfume/cologne on to mask your BO. Sometimes a little BO is easier to handle than overpowering all-consuming floral scents.

  23. Good name... by forkfail · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... but I think UnderArm might at least tie in terms of name recognition... ;-)

    --
    Check your premises.
  24. There's already a company that does just that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.aernos.com

  25. Re: Not UK Anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not as big of a moron as the guy who called an armpit sniffer "Al" powered. Quit redefining AI, YOU FLAMING DOUCHE NOZZLES.

  26. Queue SJWs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Queue SJWs crying "smellism" now.

    1. Re:Queue SJWs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We all know black people smell like shit 24/7.

      Having clothing that reminds them of their filthiness 24/7 is fucking racist.

      It is wrong to tell black people to use soap and water before they go in public. Black people have the right to smell like shit. Lower your standards, America!

  27. Detector overload. Please press restart. by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

    Yea, I know, I know. If I take a lot of Bean-o or equivalent (alpha-glactosidase from aspergillus niger) over a period of a couple weeks, it can adversely affect my aroma. I think that stuff messes with my gut flora. It becomes pretty obvious & embarrassing at the gym when everyone else in the core fitness class sets up in the opposite corner of the room.

    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
  28. Re:Not UK Anymore by nagora · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I got it wrong - they're Japanese now.

    --
    "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
  29. Re:Not UK Anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And to fact check you... Softbank sold 51% of ARM to China - it's a Chinese company with a Japanese minority owner.

  30. We're not dogs by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

    Why the focus on the armpit? We can all turn our head and sniff. Most of us can't check our other scent glands as easily.

    --
    Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
  31. Give me a break by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    Yes, let's complicate clothing by adding a breakable, pointless piece of technology that can't POSSIBLY be misused for marketing-driven purposes.

    Who actually wants this - people with body-odor issues? Do they not already know they have body-odor issues? And the article says "If it is in the armpit of your shirt, it will tell you the strength of your body odour from 1 to 5"... and? Are offices going to be modified to include closets, so we all can keep changes of clothing at work?

    A few commenters have mentioned speculative health applications - but the article makes it obvious the main thrust is driven by some weird weird plan to "see if we can create a new market by making people more self-conscious".

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Give me a break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps people with B.O. who are interested in adjusting their diet or activity to address the issue, but currently have no way to quantitatively and objectively measure if their changes are making a difference.

    2. Re:Give me a break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes anyone think I want a shirt with a piece of bumpy plastic in the armpit. That doesn't sound very comfortable.

      I don't know of any reasonable smell detector things available atm.

      But..
      "Chips built into plastic could be used to signal what kind of plastic a bottle or wrapper was made from, for example."

      All of a sudden they will be cheap enough to put in a wrapper worth like a penny ?!?

  32. Testing in India... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    will be super easy. Hardwire the sucker to always say "Stink".

  33. Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Need one of these to find some hot wakige. Now if they could only help you locate hairy girls it'd be perfect.

  34. Arm... Smell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is not a coincidence! I'm pretty sure if we pit all the chipmakers against each other, Arm can make the Smell chip better! The market reeks of rumors and there's the scent of money to be made soon.

  35. Re:Not UK Anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ARM China, not ARM.

  36. if you didn't have a nose, how would you smell ? by swell · · Score: 1

    [drum roll] TERRIBLE !

    Notice that TFS headline includes:
    "Smart Chip That Can Tell if You Smell"
    That clearly says to me that it can tell if your nose is working correctly. But I think it was meant to say that this chip can tell if you have an odor; a very different thing. Yes, I know, English is difficult to parse for some editors.

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
  37. ARM doesn't make chips and never did. by Orrin+Bloquy · · Score: 1

    From wikipedia: "Unlike most traditional microprocessor suppliers, such as Intel, Freescale (the former semiconductor division of Motorola, now NXP Semiconductors) and Renesas (a former joint venture between Hitachi and Mitsubishi Electric), Arm only creates and licenses its technology as intellectual property (IP),[70] rather than manufacturing and selling its own physical CPUs, GPUs, SoCs or microcontrollers."

    --
    "Made up/misattributed quote that makes me look smart. I am on /. and I must look smart."
  38. Easy to do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bool userStinks() { return (deviceID == "iPhone"); }

  39. I have a nose. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can smell.

  40. Re:Not UK Anymore by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    And to fact check you with your own facts, ARM Holdings sold a majority stake in its subsidiary known as Arm Technology (China) Co., Ltd
    Softbank still owns ARM Holdings

  41. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't realize it was April 1st already!

  42. Re:Not UK Anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    haha bullshit how one could confuse Japan with China?

  43. Nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a wife for that.

  44. Arm chip that can tell if you smell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will the chip be named "Under-Arm"?

  45. But, why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm just guessing here, but why does anyone with a functioning nose, or a few friends, need AI to tell 'em they stink? Oh sure, you'll say, maybe it's proof-of-concept. That may be, but I'll re-ask... Why?
    This makes no sense to me. I'm one of the two fellas on this rock that has never done a "smellfie", as that *#^$%(! commercial puts it. I know, because I've been sweating profusely/not showered in a while/stepped in dog dookie/etc.
      This world is working hard to make this old man even more profoundly grateful for my mortality, and that I was young when I was.
    AI to tellya if you stink. Juuust what we needed!

  46. Can it bring me a beer too? by thesjaakspoiler · · Score: 1

    I got a wife. She can tell me if I smell and bring me a beer. Let's see how long it takes them SiliconValley wizards to make an AI do that both....