Slashdot Mirror


Kansas is Trying to Unload $10M in Unused Computer Equipment (apnews.com)

An anonymous reader quotes the Associated Press: Kansas Governor Jeff Colyer's administration is seeking a way to donate or sell at a steep discount as much as $10 million in unused computer equipment that has been stored in a state office building since 2016. The state still owes $2 million on the equipment, which it bought in 2016 as part of a failed plan to develop a centralized storage system, call Kansas GovCloud, for computer information. That idea was canceled by state IT officials who said it was too expensive. Instead, the state contracts with an outside company to store data on remote servers.

Attempts to sell the equipment failed to attract bidders, leading to discussions about finding someone to take the equipment before its value dropped to the level of scrap metal, The Topeka Capital-Journal reported. Sen. Tom Holland, D-Baldwin City, said the state allocated $17 million, including $10 million for the equipment, before dropping the storage idea. Selling it for pennies on the dollar or donating it to someone has merit, he said. "The point is, equipment after a while just becomes obsolete. If somebody can use it, great. If you can get some money out of it, fine," Holland said.

117 comments

  1. $17 million is cheap... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Interesting

    $17 million is cheap compared to the cost of data breaches on "third party clown" systems, and the cost of giving private data to the likes of Scumazon and Scroogle to play with.

    1. Re: $17 million is cheap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Grandpa, I already taught you about client side encryption! Please try and remember...

    2. Re: $17 million is cheap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they will pay the shipping, Iâ(TM)ll take all the equipment they want to donate.

    3. Re: $17 million is cheap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Such a good grandson you are, but most of us are too forgone. The âoecloudâ confuses and scares us! We need to have to manually setup and manage servers, things like auto scaling and high availability are terrifying.

    4. Re: $17 million is cheap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Such a good grandson you are, but most of us are too forgone. The âoecloudâ confuses and scares us! We need to have to manually setup and manage servers, things like auto scaling and high availability are terrifying.

      yes, I'll remember to use your favorite encryption, Dual_EC_DRBG.

    5. Re: $17 million is cheap... by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 2

      Do you think Kansas has the available expertise within the government to secure a data center? My guess would be they are like most other states who have IT departments filled with the crap that is left over.

      I have worked with state level IT many times and it is absolutely shocking how everything is done as hack and slash. Then again, anyone investing in SAN at this point is generally unsuitable to continue working. SAN is just a terrible idea no matter how you spin it.

      And $17 million is peanuts compared to what contractors would rape a state government before the inevitable data breach.

    6. Re:$17 million is cheap... by ffkom · · Score: 2

      It will also be cheap compared to the cost of the third party cloud providers once they steeply increased their prices after having the client hooked and vendor-locked-in - with all those fancy proprietary APIs they offer, which will be too costly to migrate software off by then.

    7. Re:$17 million is cheap... by art123 · · Score: 2

      It's funny that you think an in-house state controlled system cannot suffer from data breaches.

    8. Re: $17 million is cheap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grandpa, I already taught you about Docker! Please try and remember...

    9. Re: $17 million is cheap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Such a good grandson you are! Containerizing confuses and scares us old people, being able to move your application to the cloud or back extremely easy.

    10. Re: $17 million is cheap... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

      I won't argue with you about government IT. I will argue with you about SAN. If you own the data and the system, you're not noosed to a cloud provider. You can walk away from your current contractor and find another one more easily than if you're cloud-locked.

    11. Re:$17 million is cheap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny that you think an in-house state controlled system cannot suffer from data breaches.

      It's not that they can't, but they'd likely have to be specifically targeted. With other cloud providers, one hole potentially leaks content from a few to hundreds of different organizations. So, by pure happenstance they may have greater odds of having a leak for that reason. It's a whole other story if the state were targeted, and for that I'd tend to believe the odds are better that a cloud provider would provide safety rather than the in-state staff. I'd tend to argue that in truth, luck and a lack of motivation is why most companies and organizations haven't been hacked, not a crack team of employees.

    12. Re: $17 million is cheap... by infolation · · Score: 5, Funny

      The âoecloudâ confuses and scares us!

      Also âoeunicodeâ confuses and scares us!

    13. Re: $17 million is cheap... by art123 · · Score: 1

      âoeI'd tend to argue that in truth, luck and a lack of motivation is why most companies and organizations haven't been hacked, not a crack team of employees.â

      I couldnâ(TM)t agree more with this statement.

    14. Re: $17 million is cheap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only alternative to SAN is "hyperconverged" which has some merit in some situations... but not as bulk storage. And don't tell me to use "the cloud" because I run the damn "cloud."

    15. Re:$17 million is cheap... by gravewax · · Score: 1

      Most of the breaches (at least at the moment) are from the clowns that self host, usually with poorly skilled staff.

    16. Re: $17 million is cheap... by sonamchauhan · · Score: 1

      "Do you think Kansas has the available expertise within the government to secure a data center?"

      A 12-person company may not have that expertise, but a state govt. should. If it lost the capacity, it's a sad state of affairs.

    17. Re:$17 million is cheap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny that you think an in-house state controlled system cannot suffer from data breaches.

      It's not that they can't, but they'd likely have to be specifically targeted.

      No, generally they all run the same commercial or open source software, usually with the cheapest contractor staff they can find which leaves them massively exposed.

    18. Re: $17 million is cheap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of two situations came about...

      They have staff with enough experience to build a basic set of filers, but they can't actually meet the policies in place without additional funds. ie. logging, auth, bastions/firewalls, etc to meet security requirements without additional funds. Domain separation tends to ramp up the requirements and maybe no one knew you need more then filers to run a secure setup? It isn't something you typically think about in a scenario with all of these already existing services. Based on the bits of pieces it does sound like policy was tightened up.

      Lack of technical expertise could have led into a complete buy in to some vendors great story about how it does everything. As it turns out, I find vendor solutions are more like Ikea furniture and require a bit of assembly. In many cases, chasing down bugs and proving their software/hardware is broken becomes the gig for a while. At some point, you find out no one is using it quite the way you are and everyone has features they absolutely need. If you have the talent, you start fixing their issues and chasing their support down. This may require more then surface level knowledge.

      Ten million sounds like a lot, but it really isn't when looking at commercial san/nas offerings which also include support contracts. This is especially true if the customer doesn't really understand their data storage needs. Maybe they splurged and purchased shiny new high speed NVME's at the time and I'll wager their firmware is buggy as hell.

    19. Re: $17 million is cheap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you think Kansas has the available expertise within the government to secure a data center?

      Why wouldn't they be able to do it? I sure it would be Intelligently Designed. It's not like these things Evolve over time...

    20. Re: $17 million is cheap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cloud services have been in a race to the bottom for years. The cost of storing a terabyte of data in AWS or Azure is down probably 50-60% in the past 3 years. I know it is scary to see your professional value withering away but that is no reason to spread FUD

    21. Re: $17 million is cheap... by wwphx · · Score: 1

      As much as Kansas went through its little tax-slashing mania a few years ago, I wouldn't bet that they have in-house expertise to correctly secure such an enterprise. And now it's old equipment. Yeah, dumping it is probably the best route. Maybe some of the networking gear would be good to keep, but probably wise to get ride of the servers and SANs.

      --
      When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
  2. Kansas Derp State by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0, Troll

    The state still owes $2 million on the equipment, which it bought in 2016 as part of a failed plan to develop a centralized storage system, call Kansas GovCloud, for computer information. That idea was canceled by state IT officials who said it was too expensive. Instead, the state contracts with an outside company to store data on remote servers.

    The idea was cancelled when IT experts explained to the governor and secretary of state that this equipment could make it harder to engage in election fraud and that could inadvertently cause the votes of black and Hispanic people to be counted.

    Kansas has had one of the most corrupt state governments for decades. Finally this year, the citizens of Kansas had enough and threw the Republicans out of office in the hope that they would accidentally fall into a hole somewhere 40 miles outside Topeka and never be seen again.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Kansas Derp State by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The state still owes $2 million on the equipment, which it bought in 2016 as part of a failed plan to develop a centralized storage system, call Kansas GovCloud, for computer information. That idea was canceled by state IT officials who said it was too expensive. Instead, the state contracts with an outside company to store data on remote servers.

      The idea was cancelled when IT experts explained to the governor and secretary of state that this equipment could make it harder to engage in election fraud and that could inadvertently cause the votes of black and Hispanic people to be counted.

      Kansas has had one of the most corrupt state governments for decades. Finally this year, the citizens of Kansas had enough and threw the Republicans out of office in the hope that they would accidentally fall into a hole somewhere 40 miles outside Topeka and never be seen again.

      The simplest explanation is usually correct. In this case, the government is incompetent, made bad decisions, and can't even give away computer hardware in a timely manner without dragging it out until the hardware is worthless.

      Incompetent. Just like the government of whatever blue state you live in.

    2. Re:Kansas Derp State by davecb · · Score: 1

      I'd suggest that diseconomies of scale bite everyone. I had the doubtful pleasure of dealing with large merchant banks and computer software providers in a previous life, and they were actually more dysfunctional than my city government. Scary stuff!

      --
      davecb@spamcop.net
    3. Re:Kansas Derp State by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      The simplest explanation is usually correct. In this case, the government is incompetent

      Incompetent goes without saying. If they were halfway competent, the state's economy wouldn't be in the toilet and they might not have had to commit election fraud to stay in power.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    4. Re: Kansas Derp State by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If government is so incompetent, why haven't you succeeded with your anarchy?

    5. Re: Kansas Derp State by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If government is so incompetent, why haven't you succeeded with your anarchy?

      It's not anarchy, but Democrats swept the Kansas statewide office elections.

      To give you an idea of how bad the Kansas GOP is, the people of Kansas elected a Native American lesbian to Congress over a Republican guy that Donald Trump campaigned and did rallies for and endorsed, and in a district that has been Republican for just about ever.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    6. Re: Kansas Derp State by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure that half the GOP believes Democrats are anarchists. The other half believes they are communists, and they all believe that Democrats worship Satan like the Muslim Atheists they are.

    7. Re:Kansas Derp State by youngone · · Score: 2

      Incompetent. Just like the government of whatever blue state you live in.

      Kansas is particularly bad though. The drooling fool Brownback pretty much bankrupted the joint with his "aggressive experiment in conservative economic policy".

      It shows just how stupid Republicans are when it comes to running an economy.

    8. Re: Kansas Derp State by Dan667 · · Score: 2

      Maybe you missed it but Kansas is a red state already taking hand outs from blue states

    9. Re: Kansas Derp State by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly we need to clip the wings of the Federal Government. If the power of the feds was severely reduced those dastardly red states wouldn't be able to steal your money.

    10. Re: Kansas Derp State by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If government is so incompetent, why haven't you succeeded with your anarchy?

      The anarchists are equally incompetent.

    11. Re:Kansas Derp State by wwphx · · Score: 1

      If they want them to accidentally fall into a hole, they should be sent to Oklahoma or Florida.

      --
      When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
  3. But no money for teachers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    State had $17 million to waste on useless computers while their teachers were getting paid so little they had to work second and third jobs. I read about some teachers working at McDonalds after they finished teaching school. Keep in mind Kansas had a budget surplus before a trickle down economic ideologue became a governor. After what happened in Kansas should be death knell for myth of trickle down economy.

    1. Re: But no money for teachers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until their is a direct link between politicans pay to teachers, police, firefighters, etc. there will never be money to the ones who deserve it

    2. Re:But no money for teachers by hwihyw · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Average Kansas teacher gets paid $53,314 (https://www1.salary.com/KS/Public-School-Teacher-Salary.html), before benefits. There are an average 180 days in a school year, with 6.64 hours in a school day, so 180*6.64=1195.2/$53,314=$44/hour. Raise your hand if you make close to $44/hour before benefits.

    3. Re: But no money for teachers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They work longer than a school day, most teachers i know put in a solid 40 hours a week and if they coach, add another ten hours.

    4. Re:But no money for teachers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha, average... I'm guessing that includes useless administrators.

    5. Re: But no money for teachers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /me raises his hand

    6. Re: But no money for teachers by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 4, Informative

      My hand is not raised because I donâ€(TM)t make anywhere near that little.

      That said, I have never met a teacher who does not have to grade tests, plan, prep the classroom, etc... most teachers work a lot more than you seem to think. Why not offer teachers a trade... pay them 80% per hour of their current pay and offer them to charge per hour. If they turn it down, fire them because they are either lazy or they are idiots. Of course, you would likely end up having to pay the ones who stay 50% more.

      It is obvious your teachers failed to educate you. Please learn to perform the slightest research before speaking about something. There is a new web site called Google and you can type questions into it. Use it ;)

    7. Re:But no money for teachers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      None of the teachers I've met just work during class, idiot. They usually work an extra 2-4 hours a day (before and after school) plus weekends. Not to mention the extra out-of-pocket expenses made to cover the gaps in funding. Factor that into your calculations and make some proper adjustments. No teacher has ever, ever said they feel overpaid, yet many have quit or washed out because of feeling underappreciated or unsupported.

    8. Re: But no money for teachers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Teachers working 2 and 3/jobs is fake news. That article in time magazine a few weeks back was all bs. They had a teacher in LA that had expensive rent and another in new York. Jesus just pick the most expensive places to live and interview some clown

    9. Re:But no money for teachers by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Average Kansas teacher gets paid $53,314 (https://www1.salary.com/KS/Public-School-Teacher-Salary.html), before benefits. There are an average 180 days in a school year, with 6.64 hours in a school day, so 180*6.64=1195.2/$53,314=$44/hour. Raise your hand if you make close to $44/hour before benefits.

      According to BLS, the average pay is $44,620. Kansas has 186 school days, which would not include any teacher work days but eve for an 8 hour days (most teachers are there before and after student instructional time), that works out to $30/hour. Add in time spent on teacher work days, preping for class, grading homework, etc. and it becomes even less. However, the 186 days worked doesn't mean teachers have another 6 months they can work, since that is spred out over about 9 months once vacation days are counted. Not many jobs will let you work 2 months, leave for 9 and return again. To put it into perspecive, between vacation and holidays most jobs only work 46 weeks out of the year, for a total of 1920 hours worked. If you asssume 4 teacher work days, tha means 190 days worked or 1520 hours, for an hourly rate of $29. A non teaching equivalent salary for 1920 hours is ~56K. By your standards, 56K is a great salary,

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    10. Re:But no money for teachers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ...6.64 hours in a school day... =$44/hour.

      When do you suppose lesson plans get written, and tests and quizzes get graded?

      Not to mention all the other things teachers have to do, usually on their own time.

      Then they have to fight, threaten to strike, or strike to get decent salary increases. And then after the teachers sweat blood to get a new contract then the school district just hands the administrators, janitors, etc., the same raise (or better) on a silver platter without even batting an eye.

      Sounds like you don't have any friends who are teachers.

      Maybe should try walking a mile in a teacher's shoes before you start criticizing what they get paid.

    11. Re: But no money for teachers by hwihyw · · Score: 0

      Speaking of Google, you can now choose from endless online courses, universities, academies, and learn anything you want without forcing poor teachers to slave for peanuts (except maybe recording the initial lectures). They are now free, if not will soon be, to pursue their deserved high paying jobs in the private sector.

    12. Re:But no money for teachers by stdarg · · Score: 1

      You think most jobs get 6 weeks of vacation/holidays?

      $56k is a pretty good salary, actually, considering the median household income is about $50k in Kansas. A married pair of teachers would be significantly above the median.

    13. Re:But no money for teachers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The average human has one tit

      Tell me about the median

    14. Re:But no money for teachers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I teach dual credit (high school and college credit high school classes) in Texas. It's December 22nd. I am theoretically out for Christmas Break. In reality, I was at school today working on things. I decided not to reorganize my classroom by myself; I will ask for student volunteers to help me before classes resume in January. My plan for Christmas break is to work on my classes, especially getting courses set up in our LMS.

      I did the same thing over Thanksgiving Break.

      I did the same thing last summer.

      Good teachers work every chance they get, to help the kids learn. If we took into account the value of the kids time, we would spend a lot more on the public schools.

      I can not say more without doxing myself.

    15. Re: But no money for teachers by jythie · · Score: 1

      Granted I mostly know professors, but wow would they be grateful for only 40-50 hours/week....

    16. Re:But no money for teachers by sjames · · Score: 3, Informative

      You forgot that teachers have to work several hours a day after the last class grading papers, talking to parents, and filling out a never ending stream of documents and forms for the bureaucracy. Also many teachers end up having to pay out of pocket for needed supplies since the official channels will take so long the students will graduate before the request is filled (if ever).

    17. Re:But no money for teachers by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Almost all humans have two teats; some are just more developed than others.

    18. Re:But no money for teachers by markdavis · · Score: 1

      >"By your standards, 56K is a great salary"

      In Kansas, it probably very much is a great salary. And that doesn't include their generally great benefits. In some other areas, that is not at a great salary at all. Where one lives makes a HUGE difference due to taxes, housing costs, and local prices.

      To see the difference, even ignoring huge tax differences, just look at the average price of a decent 1 bedroom apartment from place to place. It can vary from $400 up to $4000 per month. That is huge. Now double their state income taxes on top of that. Now increase their sales taxes. Now double or triple the gas tax (example- right now KS is $2/gal while CA is $3.40/gal). And double or triple the insurance costs. I think you get the idea.

    19. Re: But no money for teachers by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2

      I notice how you failed to include the relevant part of that figure: "The average Public School Teacher salary in Kansas is $53,314 as of December 01, 2018, but the range typically falls between $46,543 and $61,547. Salary ranges can vary widely depending on the city and many other important factors, including education, certifications, additional skills, the number of years you have spent in your profession."

      Also I highly doubt teachers work 6.65 hours per day unless you think that the teachers roll up to school 5 minutes before classes start. Also in your wold do homework and test grade themselves and teacher never have to do any sort of prep work.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    20. Re: But no money for teachers by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      If only potential employers didn't need some sort of proof that I have knowledge of a topic. Usually grades and diplomas are accepted as proof instead of my word.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    21. Re: But no money for teachers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because I donâ(TM)t make anywhere

      Whoah. Your device is really Appleing things up. Are you sure you're holding it right?

    22. Re:But no money for teachers by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      "Teachers and "pay" cant teach IQ.
      Generations have tried to teach people using books, computers, robot GUI, new software, enjoyed spending huge extra charity budgets.
      Better teachers don't help. More pay does not help. Different types of new computer "education" has the same low results.
      Demographics and IQ always show up on testing and results years and decades later.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    23. Re:But no money for teachers by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Not many jobs will let you work 2 months, leave for 9 and return again.

      Nah, there are loads of jobs like that, especially in the summer, at least in places worth visiting on vacation. That does of course mean that they are less prevalent in Kansas. However, none of them pay anything.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    24. Re: But no money for teachers by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      When I was in college I would work a summer job for spending money during the school year. Most of the people working the seasonal job with me were students and teachers.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    25. Re:But no money for teachers by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      >"By your standards, 56K is a great salary"

      In Kansas, it probably very much is a great salary. And that doesn't include their generally great benefits. In some other areas, that is not at a great salary at all. Where one lives makes a HUGE difference due to taxes, housing costs, and local prices.

      To see the difference, even ignoring huge tax differences, just look at the average price of a decent 1 bedroom apartment from place to place. It can vary from $400 up to $4000 per month. That is huge. Now double their state income taxes on top of that. Now increase their sales taxes. Now double or triple the gas tax (example- right now KS is $2/gal while CA is $3.40/gal). And double or triple the insurance costs. I think you get the idea.

      I fully agree; cost of living makes a huge difference in lifestyle. My point was that calculating a teachers salary but dividing hours worked into salary gives a false impression of what they are paid relative to someone who works a regular scheduled job.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    26. Re:But no money for teachers by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      Not many jobs will let you work 2 months, leave for 9 and return again.

      Nah, there are loads of jobs like that, especially in the summer, at least in places worth visiting on vacation. That does of course mean that they are less prevalent in Kansas. However, none of them pay anything.

      That's the crux of the issue. The teachers I know joke you can tell which teachers have a spouse/partner/whatever with a real job by the car they drive; unless it's a nice brand new loaded truck and then they are a winning football coach.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    27. Re:But no money for teachers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      My Dad is a retired teacher, my Sis was working as a teacher for about 10 years, and I was a relief teacher.

      I also know a few other teacher friends.

      You probably have to increase your figures in terms of number of hours worked alot more, especially when it is test or exam season.

      I know of teachers working about 10 to 12 hours a day for a couple of weeks at a time. Part of the time will be at home while they mark, prep tests, classes, etc.

      No doubt this is not in the US (Singapore), but I assume it will be similar in most places.

    28. Re: But no money for teachers by WindowsStar · · Score: 1

      I work with teachers and I have never seen them work more than 7 hours a day. They really do make a lot of money considering the time the work and all the time they have off. Every teacher I know took a nice 30 day paid vacation in 2018. I didn't have the time or the money. I work an easy 15 hours each day and we will be working hard this LONG school break.

    29. Re: But no money for teachers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      High school diplomas are barely worth the paper they're printed on. The best it can get you is a job at a restaurant.

    30. Re: But no money for teachers by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Guess you picked the wrong profession.

  4. Donate to Schools? by jonesy16 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And the geniuses at the state level have or have not considered donating this to other public entities in the state, e.g., the public school systems, state universities, etc. that probably all receive some level of state funding?

    1. Re:Donate to Schools? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know if a public school would have much need for cloud servers. They might be useful on the backend, but most students and teachers won't use them.

      State universities might have some use for them if they aren't already using equipment.

    2. Re: Donate to Schools? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gawd, this common sense would make you a horrible politician

    3. Re: Donate to Schools? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if they were not using equipment where would they put it? And what is it even good for? Teaching super advanced calculus? I suppose you could always turn them into door stops or stools

    4. Re:Donate to Schools? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Whats the cost of running a 1970's super computer? To get it to do some math again?

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    5. Re: Donate to Schools? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Considering that the equipment failed to get sold at auction, there's probably a reason schools don't want it. My guess is that the equipment is highly specific. Or it is obsolete even though it was purchased 2 years ago. Or the amount of work/expertise required to install is more than any school can afford. Or a combination.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    6. Re: Donate to Schools? by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

      With ECL logic in it, it probably runs at several hundred megahertz. The floor it is installed on will probably need to be reinforced to support the massive cooling system required to keep it running.

    7. Re: Donate to Schools? by drinkypoo · · Score: 0

      My guess is that the equipment is highly specific. Or it is obsolete even though it was purchased 2 years ago. Or the amount of work/expertise required to install is more than any school can afford. Or a combination.

      Almost certainly the correct answer is "already obsolete." It often takes governments so long to get their act together that the equipment is already past its prime by the time they get it in their hands, because of all of their ridiculous process and procedure which doesn't actually stop malfeasance anyway.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  5. Nice pitch by AndyKron · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sales pitch: Quick! Buy it before it becomes worthless.

    1. Re:Nice pitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its like the ad for PCs/laptops - "these won't last long." Well, I was kinda hoping that the laptop would last at least a few years, you know...

  6. I'm sure for $2 Million by bobstreo · · Score: 1

    more, paid by Kansas, there are a couple of companies willing to take 2+ year old electronic scrap away.

    As soon as they accepted delivery, the equipment had probably lost 1/2 it's value, so following Generally Accepted Accounting Practices, they should have depreciated the value of most of this junk already.

  7. Kansas, Republican Stronghold - like to Spend, Spe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nd, Spend, but hate to tax to pay for their spending. Goofballs. Neverumind all the other shenanigans.

  8. But what kit is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really can't find much reference as to what hardware this is all about, anyway. Anyone?

  9. Cleaning it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    failed plan to develop a centralized storage system

    The solution was simple as to allocate many harddisks in RAID6 and to use the Hadoop/Spark systems.

    Is it really spent $10M in it? Show us the cashes!

    1. Re: Cleaning it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey $10 million bucks will put you in your own private jet. Nothing to sneeze at

  10. List of Crag's list and put on the street. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tell me a day. and I will drive over a pick it up.

    Really, though. find a local 501c3 that has a computer tech class. It may be worthless, but that group can use it. Think of it as lab equipment, to learn and earn a degree, OS load, Repair, Networking, ...

    I helped a group in 2nd city imn early 2000... Racks, switches, servers, DELL 6 processor P-Pro, AX machine, Sun, HP/9000, 75 486 matched PC, CD-ROM sderver 28 drives, 6 drive baby. Yes, it was all old equipment. The AX is what I got cert with. 75 matched machines was for computer repair classes. Others in the inner city, got their certs to becuase of this. Also 2 shelters for women and families. Firewall were create, and more and more.

    It is one reason to keep local Linux active and growing.. the gift of knowledge even if it old... is still knowledge. Eleectron flow does not change, even if the processor is newer and faster.

    YES, it is all old

  11. 10 Million by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's just dust in the wind.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:10 Million by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a drop of silicon in an endless sea
      All we do
      Crashes to the ground
      At the touch of I.T.

    2. Re:10 Million by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      10 mill here, and 10 mill there--after a while you're talking about some real money.. Carry on, my wayward son.

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
  12. Outsourced to CGI Group for 59 mill over 10 years by bongey · · Score: 4, Informative

    Same contractor for healthcare.gov seems they are trying to unload the equipment to a school . https://www.seattletimes.com/n...

  13. Ahh, memories by Snotnose · · Score: 2

    Back in the early/mid 80's my company bought 4 DEC PC clones for something like $3500 each (PC at the time were about $2k, depending on options). They sucked on multiple levels. The one I remember is the OS (MS-DOS) didn't come with the format program, you had to buy formatted discs from DEC for like $2 each. Or get one of your engineers to format a $0.25 disc at home and bring it in. Whatever. The managers that got them soon gave them to senior engineers, who soon gave them to team leads, who soon realized nobody wanted them. At that point every engineer worth a damn had their own PC at home that cost half as much and was twice as powerful.

    Company ended up donating them to a charity or school, and deducted the full purchase price from their taxes. How do I know this? The president of the company, in a company wide meeting, said so.

    1. Re:Ahh, memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool story, gramps.

    2. Re: Ahh, memories by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't you be off playing Fortnight or Farmville or something, kid?

  14. I'll take it by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

    If they pay the shipping I'll find room for it. I just upgraded the disks on my NAS but I could always use more storage space.

  15. Inventory list, please... by DidgetMaster · · Score: 2

    'Computer equipment' could mean anything. If it were practical things like disk drives, SSD, or tons of memory that could be easily used in other hardware then I think they could have gotten some decent bids on it. The fact that they couldn't attract any bids tells me either it is all junk, or they are not giving out proper information so they can unload it for pennies on the dollar to some crony friend who will make a killing on the deal at taxpayer expense.

  16. any 10G swtiching in there? I can use some stuff by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    any 10G switching in there? I can use some stuff to build out an new ceph + VM cluster.

  17. so... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So build some Beowulf machines.

  18. Re:any 10G swtiching in there? I can use some stuf by DidgetMaster · · Score: 1

    Let's see....they paid $10 million for it two years ago. Since they are the government, they probably paid 3 times what it was worth by going through 'approved vendors' who are used to soaking it to the taxpayer. Computer equipment tends to depreciate at a quick pace, so it could easily lose half its value in a couple of years. Still, it should be worth a couple million dollars to somebody if there was any decent hardware in there that wasn't so specialized that it doesn't have any practical use outside of its original intent (e.g. anything built by NASA).

  19. I notice you're quoting average by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Interesting

    and not median. I suspect the numbers are heavily cooked. I make good money in IT and I don't spend my evenings at McDonalds. Yet we know for a fact many teachers in Kansas are doing just that. Too many for it to be the occasional workaholic.

    I know that in my neck of the woods schools in wealthy neighborhoods have much, much better pay. That's because schools are funded by property taxes, so wealthy districts have wealthy schools. That would, of course, screw up the averages. I can't find any sources for the $44k and $56k figures being but I wouldn't be surprised to find University research professors mixed in there with their $100k+ salaries. Again, anything to inflate the average.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  20. It's probably junk hardware by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    and they're trying to cover that up. e.g. it was all just a grift. Kansas has gotten really, really corrupt these last 8 years or so.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  21. Is there a list & how do you apply? by NormAtHome · · Score: 1

    I work for a couple non-profits who've been hit hard by budget cuts; is there a list of what they're trying to get rid of and any way to apply for it even if the non-profit has to pay for shipping it probably would be well worth it for some items?

  22. Plenty of money for teachers by Solandri · · Score: 1

    The Kansas public education budget is $4.9 billion. It works out to almost exactly $10,000 per student, with about 39% of that going to instructor salary, 12% to instructor benefits.

    With 41,243 teachers, that works out to an average (mean) salary of $46,300 plus $13,800 in benefits.

    This compares to a statewide average (mean) income of $43,953. Searching through those labor stats for "education" confirms that the mean for most teaching jobs is right around the $45k mark.

    If your claim that teachers have to work second or third jobs just to get by is true, that would mean more than half of Kansas citizens have to work second or third jobs just to get by.

  23. You can tell he's Republican by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because he clearly is not sure how one goes about making donations to charity.

  24. Sounds like campaign donations by Benfea · · Score: 1

    I wonder which politicians got bribes campaign donations from the company they ultimately bought cloud service from? I would feel pity for the Kansas taxpayer, but they voted Republican, so they had to expect huge deficits and corruption.

    1. Re:Sounds like campaign donations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder which politicians got bribes campaign donations from the company they ultimately bought cloud service from? I would feel pity for the Kansas taxpayer, but they voted Republican, so they had to expect huge deficits and corruption.

      At some point its hard to feel much sympathy for people who think Trump is great. You can feel a little for people who are just normal republicans and their normal reality distortion field was enough for them to believe that Hillary truly was worse. I've been tempted to so many times at work to point out yes, I was in fact right that Trump was going to be a disaster, but its pointless. Some people are just broken and can't be fixed to function rationally in certain areas. It won't help. You won't convince any of the truly faithful. At the same good its hard to take any joy in being proven right, since that means the worst has come to pass.

      I hope the equipment finds a home. I'd call state colleges and see if anyone can use it.

      As far as everything else, well its nearly Christmas. One can hope the new year will be better, that people perhaps will embrace one thing above all others, and that is simple truth. Pretty much all other problems can be solved, eventually, if you have that.

  25. Imagine a beowulf cluster of these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really, I could use a few million dollars in hardware.

  26. This sounds like my old boss... by magusxxx · · Score: 1

    + "Let's upgrade our stores to use hand scanners at checkout!"
    + "Let's buy the equipment used at auction!"
    + "Let's read the manual and put the inventory on the computer ourselves!"
    + "Let's forget the whole damn thing!"

    10 years later...Clerks still put price stickers on items and ring things up manually.

    The equipment is still in their warehouse gathering dust.

    --
    Care killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back.
  27. That's a buttload of TRS-80s by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

    $10 million should buy about 73,000 TRS-80s, if you figure $100 each plus $37 shipping. At an estimated weight of 44 lbs each, that comes to 3.2 million lbs, or 1605 tons. Here's yer first shipment. Cmon back. Cmon back.

    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
  28. Where's the list of equipment? by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

    Where's the actual list of equipment to be disposed of? Personally, I can't see the Kansas state government knowing it's hole from an ass in the wall, so I doubt if the equipment is up to snuff. But who knows? Maybe they accidentally ordered a Cray or something.

    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
    1. Re:Where's the list of equipment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The contract for the equipment appears to be here

    2. Re: Where's the list of equipment? by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      I am not sure you could give it away. Cisco UMS and EMC Vplex, what a crock of shit.

    3. Re: Where's the list of equipment? by nevermindme · · Score: 1

      In the general case, the support costs on that gear are 16-33% of purchase price per year. Since that gear list price has been cut in half over the past 2 year nobody can afford to take it on in a supported manner. Even free hardware would cost twice as much in 3-5 years lifetime that would be required to put it into a data center just about anywhere.

      State and Local governments should externalize there compute and storage requirements, They are obviously to slow to even play in this field. If a project never takes off the cloud bills are low for the CPU and bandwidth side.

    4. Re:Where's the list of equipment? by Walter+White · · Score: 1

      Apparently you have to sell your soul to Microsoft to view the contract. Looks like gibberish in LibreOffice.

  29. guessing its all netapp gear? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    guessing its all netapp gear?

  30. How can I buy a 2-3 year old, never been used comp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I need new computers for my small business. Iâ(TM)ll take 3 at scrap metal price please. Thanks.

  31. Re: How can I buy a 2-3 year old, never been used by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, servers... never mind

  32. 100 comments in and no "Hwat!" yet? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
    What is Slashdot coming to, that no one has dug up the trope of "Imagine a Beowulf cluster of those", run it up the flagpole and watched it flap in the breeze?

    (Take one Geek point for seeing the Beowulf in the "Subject:" line. )

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  33. Government *sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We got i7s with W10 and 4GB RAM which we get old from waiting then to power up. Sometimes, using just Excel and other Office applications simultaneously makes them come to a halt. I get angry just by looking at that video-like Windows circle telling us to wait and wait and wait.

    These machines would certainly fly with Linux... I wonder about what kind of PCs are getting donated or sold.

  34. How was Kansas intending to fulfill by MSInsight · · Score: 1

    freedom of information act (KSA 45-215 et seq) requests if GovCloud data was not able to be exported in some format for review and redaction? Looks like conservatives weren't interested in news media looking over their shoulder and second guessing their performance and decisions of state departments. That would go along with conservative's overzealous implementation of digitization of governmental functions even when they betray asserted fiduciary motives to sell them while hidden political motives to reduce civil servant union headcount is the prime motivator regardless of lower end user service levels, failed state and federal compliance, and rising technology/technical labor costs in over-the-horizon years which vastly exceed the cost of file cabinet/file folder systems.