Slashdot Mirror


The Top Free Online University Courses of 2018, Ranked by Popularity (freecodecamp.org)

Free online courses -- also called Massive Open Online Courses -- have quite a year. An anonymous reader shares a blog post: It's been seven years since these courses rose to prominence, when a few Stanford professors decided to offer their courses online free. Since then over over 900 universities have launched over 11,000 courses. And in its seven years these Massive Online Open Courses (MOOCs) have achieved new milestone: 100 million plus learners. [...] At the end of every year, I do an extensive analysis of the MOOC space. To help me with analysis, I send the top MOOC providers a set of questions, one of them being the top enrolled courses of 2018.

The list below contains the top enrolled courses from the major MOOC providers: Coursera, edX, Udacity, and FutureLearn. Combined, these providers represent a big chunk of the MOOC learners (70 million plus). Without further ado, here are the most popular free online university courses of 2018:
Learning How to Learn: Powerful mental tools to help you master tough subjects from University of California, San Diego.
Machine Learning from Stanford University.
The Science of Well-Being from Yale University.
Introduction to Computer Science and Programming Using Python from Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
CS50's Introduction to Computer Science from Harvard University.

33 comments

  1. Disappointing... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Disappointing that basic science and maths courses don't even make the top 30 or so...

    1. Re:Disappointing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm going to assume everyone already did those in high school or college...

    2. Re:Disappointing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Judging by casual observation of the last few years, I'd say your assumption might be just a tad over-optimistic

    3. Re:Disappointing... by vtcodger · · Score: 2

      There are so many sources of free tutorial material on the Internet, that I'm not sure lists of the most popular courses are all that meaningful. For example, the Feynman Physics Lectures are available at http://www.feynmanlectures.cal.... That's years worth of study material. It may just be an issue of not looking in the right place for basic science and math courses

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    4. Re: Disappointing... by TJHook3r · · Score: 1

      Khan Academy has discrete subjects that can be taken together as a learning path - no certificates at the end but the tutorials are excellent.

    5. Re: Disappointing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "excellent" for shitty smelly parasites hindu-chimps with fake jungle diplomas, and for sand n1ggers.

    6. Re: Disappointing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. I've not even seen any MOOC math courses, for the most part. The MIT CS course was fine, I took it a few years ago for shits and giggles, but I'd really love to see a path for math, even starting at precalc or lower. Khan is a decent source, but it does feel a bit limited somehow.

      Source: I'm trying to get back into maths to further my interests in machine learning, data analysis, etc, but am finding I don't remember jack shit from my college maths (calc, linear algebra, etc) and am going back to the basics.

  2. Wrong... by 110010001000 · · Score: 3, Funny

    The top one is "Host Files: What they do and how to Maintain Them".

    1. Re:Wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Preach it!

  3. I TOOK A BATH TODAY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lost the shirt off my back!
    Looking at all my options!
    If it weren't for bad luck, I wouldn't have any luck at all!
    Just too rolling STONED!
    For those about to Rock!
    Fire! POW!!ELL!
    We Salute You!

  4. Re: Trump University, Tax Preparation 101 by XiadAbou-Wasaa · · Score: 0

    Looool

  5. The Evil Empire by Ashthon · · Score: 1, Funny

    Positive proof that Microsoft is pure evil:

    Learn to Program in Java from Microsoft
    Introduction to Python: Absolute Beginner from Microsoft

    Java?! Python?! It's one thing to engage in anticompetitive business practices, but now they're trying to distort people's minds and ruin their lives!

    Don't even get me started on:

    Introduction to Data Analysis using Excel from Microsoft
    Analyzing and Visualizing Data with Excel from Microsoft

    That's just sick!

    1. Re:The Evil Empire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's wrong with the last bit? Excel is still used fairly heavily in the data analysis world. R is big (and also owned by MS) and Python (via Jupyter, etc) is huge. I really don't see the problem with these (although java can suck a dick. C# is a better java, let's face it) for data science, etc.

    2. Re:The Evil Empire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      C# is a Java wannabe ruined by immense amounts of crap and a memory model that guarantees security problems.

    3. Re:The Evil Empire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The Analyzing and Visualizing Data one is mostly about power pivot and the new data model. The concepts carry over well to Tableau, Qlik or probably any other Business Intelligence Software of that type.

      And it's completely free.

    4. Re:The Evil Empire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      May I personally recommend these courses for you:

      Hyperbole: when words mean something other than their dictionary definition by Microsoft.

      Going Over Your Head: a metaphorical ladder to help you catch the jist by Microsoft

      Why smooth curve graphs for Excel should be banned under international treaty by literally everyone (except Microsoft)

  6. The garbage floats. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What else is new on /.?

  7. Agreed by DogDude · · Score: 2

    The idea of the Internet democratizing information sadly, hasn't happened (yet?). So far, the Internet is largely used for porn and cat pics and other stupid garbage. As someone who's used the Net from before there was a Web, it's severely disappointing.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re: Agreed by TimMD909 · · Score: 2

      Look at your screen name. Of course you'd like less cat photos.

    2. Re: Agreed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *fewer

    3. Re:Agreed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the beginning I was frequent user of Coursera ... but they have changed later to model "if you do not pay you cannot even take assessments" ... i would pay $50 per course if, and only if those courses could be counted against some degree ... the problem is that i am foreigner and, no, to attend any college/university you have to go through the seventy and seven step process ... starting with language test and transcription of your whole curriculum ... no your diploma is not enough .... and (garbage) letter of recommendation from your teachers ... get real that was 20 years ago, they are dead mostly by now.

      I counted money ($50 is a bet more here than in the US) ... and decided I will pay for a year of university in the UK ... at least they are obliged to recognize diplomas from other EU countries ... and the price will be the same as for bunch of useless (no effect in your education level) courses.
      One year is all that I need for master level courses in UK. With tuition cost ~20k GBP.

      Taking into account that i am working remotely for US customers (West Coast) from EU, I will save some money not participating in "students life" by nights ...but I will also complete education debt free ...

  8. Text-based online classes by myid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've taken online programming classes that were text-based (you read the lessons), and classes that were video-based (you watch a video of the teacher giving the lecture).

    I much prefer text-based classes.

    - You don't have to take notes,

    - there's no misunderstanding of what the teacher said (misunderstanding the spoken word),

    - you can do a search on a word (ex: inherit) to find and read what the teacher said about that subject,

    - you can easily go back and re-read a paragraph that you didn't understand,

    - the sample code is embedded right there in the lesson, and

    - there's much less bandwidth with text than with video.

    I've only found two schools that offer text-based online classes that aren't super expensive: https://www.freecodecamp.org/ and https://ed2go.com/. (ed2go is cheap but not free.) Unfortunately, neither of these schools teaches more advanced stuff like Java Servlets.

    ed2go is mostly text-based, but if necessary, they supply a video. For example, I took an ed2go class in Photoshop. The lessons contained text and images, but they also contained short videos. "Click here, then click there. See how the color changes from blue to red." Those short videos really helped.

    Does anyone know of any other school that offers online classes that are text-based (not video-based)?

    1. Re:Text-based online classes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a book, read it, do the exercises? Or is there something essential that you're missing with that approach?

      Me, I stopped with the courses after burning out on trying to do too many at the same time, twice. But also because I got really really tired of finding my kiosk-like setup (a minimal linux booted from usb stick) kept on needing to be updated because they were tinkering witth their "platform" so much every other week something important stopped working. And then I ran out of CPU cycles to keep up with the "platform". It all worked reasonably well the first few MOOCs (I did all three available at first: AI, machine learning, databases), but went downhill quite quickly after that, on basically all those "platforms". As in, the videos worked fine as long as I downloaded them first, then played them in mplayer; in the browser they'd crash the whole system, and outside video, many many necessary things ended up breaking time and again. Coursera, udacity, edx, they all wanted ever more resources from my (admittedly rather low end) computer, so I just gave up.

    2. Re:Text-based online classes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a book, read it, do the exercises? Or is there something essential that you're missing with that approach?

      I like getting feedback from the teacher. "You need to make your code more efficient, or easier to modify. This method has been deprecated." etc. My code might seem ok to me, but the teacher would point out flaws in it.

  9. You know what would be actually useful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Data on the "top popular courses" ranked by number of people who actually completed the entire course. Oh wait, they don't have those statistics, do they?

    1. Re: You know what would be actually useful? by TJHook3r · · Score: 1

      There are completion stats somewhere... I recall that MOOCs have a tiny completion rate generally but that probably means the objective is to get somewhat better at a subject or study a specific part, rather than obtain a degree level of understanding.

    2. Re:You know what would be actually useful? by hraponssi · · Score: 1

      That would be both useful and and interesting. I started on the Stanford ML course a few times but never found the motivation to finish it, with the focus on all the details I would rather have the tools and libraries take care of for me, and focus on the applications. I would expect many to be similarly interested and have a look, especially in case of free courses..

  10. PROGRAMMING IN ENGLISH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is the top course. Guess aliens are learning to code like monkeys.

  11. Who invented MOOCs? by VeryFluffyBunny · · Score: 1

    Stanford University didn't invent MOOCs or even Open Educational Resources (OER).

    AFAIK, the first time a course was offered as a MOOC was at the University of Manitoba in Canada, in 2008, called Connectivism and Connective Knowledge. It lasted 32 weeks & was a loosely organised network of students kept informed of the course materials & each others' contributions via an RSS aggregator. As they stand, currently popular MOOCs are no better than buying a well-written book on a given subject. I've reviewed a few courses on the aforementioned MOOC platforms from the article & have found many inaccuracies & out of date information, as well as incoherent theory & practices being presented, i.e. although these courses are presented under the names of prestigious universities, they aren't quality controlled very well.

    By their own admission, MOOCs have incredibly high dropout rates, which many have tried to excuse due them being free. 95% failure rate of anything, whether it's free or not is an unacceptable model for any education or training provision.

    A major failing of MOOCs is in assessment, both formative & summative. While presenting information in multiple formats & multimedia scales cheaply & easily, assessment does not. It still takes the same numbers per student of expert human hours to give feedback on & grade students' work.

    OER were first released to the public by the University of Tubingen, Germany. The major difference between a MOOC & OER is that OER courses can be freely copied, adapted, reused, & redistributed by anyone without requiring permission, i.e. permission is automatically granted to everyone. The OECD claims that OER are likely to make significant & substantial changes to how educational materials are funded, designed, & published over the next few decades, which has commercial academic publishers very worried. If you want to revolutionise education, OER is currently the way to go.

    --
    Debate is a form of harassment. Do not question my truth.