Slashdot Mirror


Trump Signs Legislation To Boost Quantum Computing Research With $1.2 billion (geekwire.com)

President Donald Trump last week signed legislation ramping up quantum computing research and development. From a report: The National Quantum Initiative Act (H.R. 6227) authorizes $1.2 billion over five years for federal activities aimed at boosting investment in quantum information science, or QIS, and supporting a quantum-smart workforce. The law also establishes a National Quantum Coordination Office, calls for the development of a five-year strategic plan and establishes an advisory committee to advise the White House on issues relating to quantum computing. "This next great technological revolution has far-reaching implications for job creation, economic growth and national security," Michael Kratsios, deputy assistant to the president for technology policy, said in a White House statement. "We look forward to building upon efforts to support the quantum-smart workforce of the future and engage with government, academic and private-sector leaders to advance QIS."

[...] Earlier this month, a report from the National Academies of Science said there is an urgent need to develop "post-quantum" encryption protocols in order to protect commerce and national security. QIS research could also produce new types of quantum processors, sensors, navigation tools and security systems. The challenges could bring about "new approaches to understanding materials, chemistry and even gravity through quantum information theory," according to a White House strategy paper issued in September.

120 comments

  1. with what money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All these tax cuts and the idiot still can't balance a check book

    1. Re:with what money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Mueller will handle it"

    2. Re: with what money? by SocietyoftheFist · · Score: 1

      Yet tax revenue is way down , declined significantly in FY17, but spending is way up.

    3. Re:with what money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a moron. Trump's taxes are going to be public records in about 2 weeks, enjoy traitor!

    4. Re: with what money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Largest deficit in 25 years, largest trade imbalance with China EVER, and largest new bailouts for US farmers in a single Presidency in US history. It's a shit show. Trump should flee back to Russia while he can, beg for asylum.

    5. Re:with what money? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Which President was the last one to actually balance the "check book" and have a surplus of funds at the end of the year (you know, not add to the national debt)?

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    6. Re:with what money? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Which President was the last one to actually balance the "check book" and have a surplus of funds at the end of the year (you know, not add to the national debt)?

      it was the one who noted that by adding the Boomers' peak year payments into the Social Security system to revenue, he could claim a budget surplus that year. Today, those Boomers are retired and drawing from the program rather than paying into it, so Clinton's accounting hack no longer works.

    7. Re: with what money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you are complaining that because taxes were lowered after Clinton (current payments to social security don't match Boomer withdrawals) it somehow means the Clinton years didn't run balanced budgets for some years? That seems like sophistry.

    8. Re:with what money? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      It goes back further than that - quite a bit further... The last President to actually run a surplus (meaning - they did not have to borrow money, which is what you do when you have a deficit) was Eisenhower, in 1957. It's been 61 years since we've had a surplus.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    9. Re: with what money? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      President Clinton ran a balanced "on books" budget; every year since 1957 the US Federal Government has borrowed money. Our debt has increased every year since Eisenhower. Clinton's accounting scam wasn't about Social Security surpluses - it was about ignoring much of the Federal spending as "off budget" and crowing about the little bit left as "balanced!"

      It would be like you having $10,000 a month in expenses, a $3,000 per month mortgage, and considering yourself in surplus because you brought home $7,500 per month and have declared your mortgage as "off the budget".

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    10. Re: with what money? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      It had nothing to do with tax cuts. Because there are numerically more Boomers than Xers, net payments into Social Security peaked in the Nineties, just in time to produce a "surplus" if added to federal revenue. Now that Xers are the folk paying into the system, inward payments are down while the huge cohort of Boomers is drawing from the program.

    11. Re: with what money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tax revenues are UP! You miss Sesame Street that day? Which number is larger.. Not a matter of opinion. Trump cut the tax rates and the total collected revenue went UP. Trump did the only thing you can to address a trade imbalance... TARIFFS! They helped, but not enough to address the massive buying power the US Consumer was armed with after those tax cuts and the largest number of employed people in history, getting the highest average wages in history...
      Weird fantasy you have - dreaming that things are bad for Americans makes you happy. Ponder that.

    12. Re: with what money? by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

      Who would let themselves get roped into a $3000 mortgage? Our monthly mortgage is high, at $800, but we have five acres of land.

    13. Re: with what money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, someone who wants to pay off their debt quickly rather than drag it out their entire life and end up paying more in interest than principal?

    14. Re: with what money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BUH MUH STOX!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11111111111111

      Because, yanno, Joe Average American with no savings whatsoever is totally vested.

    15. Re: with what money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol including property taxes I pay $9300 a month. I also dont live in a shack or third world part of country like you apparently so.

      Wealth is relative. You are poor because you think and behave like a poor person. You always will. And you you keep voting for people who keep you poor while telling you how they are going to somehow help you. You are fucking doomed.

    16. Re: with what money? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Way to miss the point. You can't ignore some of your expenses and still claim you "have a surplus". Yet that is exactly the game played. Check the historical record, you'll find the last time we did not add to the national debt was 1957 under President Eisenhower. We've borrowed money every year thereafter.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    17. Re: with what money? by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

      People here don't act like they live in the third world.

      In fact, I would bet that there are many, many more people who live a third world lifestyle (immigrants and minorities) in your part of the country than mine.

  2. Selling the idea by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    They probably told him the research buildings will be built near the border and double as The Wall.

    1. Re:Selling the idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a new clubhouse at mar a lago?

      trump tower moscow?

      the new executive wing at leavenworth?

  3. Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not much else to say. Glad to see there is state funding for research like this.

  4. Lunch menu? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Whoops, I thought I was ordering lunch! Nobody told me this page I signed on my desk was to help someone! Pffft. Fake menu."

  5. He'll just give the research to the Russians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Best functional retard useful agent ever.

    1. Re: He'll just give the research to the Russians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL

      And I have Russian friends who just a few months ago would never speak ill of Putin. Now they are leaning for him to retire. It's a little shocking. Putin thinks he is in charge over there, yet more and more it looks like his grip on power is more tenuous than we were lead to believe. His lust for women and money will be his undoing, as it is now undoing his little Trumposka.

    2. Re: He'll just give the research to the Russians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lust for women and money never did anything to Clinton.

  6. "The biggest, most powerful Qubits.." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The likes of which.... the world has never seen." /moron

  7. LOL ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow ... I read that as "Trump Sings Legislation", and thought "damn, now there's an internet video I might watch".

  8. "Baby it's treason outside" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Vladdy baby, come on down the chimney tonight..."

    "Silent might"

    "Rudolphski the red-backed turncoat"

    "Jingle jails"

    Collude... they told me... dumb dumb dumb dumb dumb...

  9. What a by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Americans deserve the best quantums ever! We will out quantum Jiiina, believe me! Schrodinger didn't send us his best cats. No more cats from shit-hole dumpsters; we will hire THE best cats, and I know cats better than the Generals. I grab really terrific quantum bits; even those Q-bits, and all letters of the alphabet even. Know 'em well. T-bits are my favorite, of course [applause]. #MakeAmericanCatsHalfDeadAgain!"

    1. Re:What a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Let me just say, I know entanglement, okay? I've been entangled in things for decades now, big things, bad things. There's nobody more entangled than me. Nobody. Any photon splits off from me, it's a liar, you can't trust it.

    2. Re:What a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ...and all my staff exist in a half-fired state."

    3. Re:What a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can hear it. I can actually hear his voice saying this.
      Top comedy.

    4. Re:What a by msmash++(Info+King) · · Score: 0

      Agree total 100% entirely. You call him orange man, I call him orange handz because he need wash himself with "orange handz" soap since he such dirty lol.

      Hi president TRUMP- why we not feed the needy with that billion?
      Why we not feed the poor with that billion?
      Why we not feed the weak with that billion?
      Why we not feed the homeless with that billion?
      Why we not feed the hungry with that billion?

      "Orange Hanz" as we call him, too dimented and sick to think of people with needs, disgusting!

    5. Re: What a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should he? You arenâ(TM)t interested in the poor. You probably avoid them.

    6. Re:What a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ORANGE MAN BAD

      Orange Man Funny. He even reminded us how boring politics would be without him. Brings jolly laughter. Have a great holiday, ho ho ho! (Just hope he doesn't push the wrong button or something.)

    7. Re: What a by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      There's hundreds of billions if not over a trillion you could use for "the poor", cutting from elsewhere in the budget before this.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    8. Re: What a by Dan667 · · Score: 1

      Giving American tech to China is bad. Trump sucks

  10. Wow maybe did something right for once by foxalopex · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Wow, I'm surprised but I guess a broken analogue clock is right at least once in a day. I guess someone in Intelligence got through to Trump. Although Quantum processors are unproven so far, there are some hints that it could be used to rapidly break encryption which most of the world depends on. Still it might be a huge waste of money but I guess we'll see.

    1. Re:Wow maybe did something right for once by 110010001000 · · Score: 0, Troll

      More like the lobbyists from the tech companies got to get some free taxpayer money since practical quantum computing has been a hoax so far.

    2. Re:Wow maybe did something right for once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No problem. We just AI the effort and all will be good.

    3. Re:Wow maybe did something right for once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah you AI chatbots are so fucking legible.

    4. Re:Wow maybe did something right for once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess someone in Intelligence got through to Trump.

      Some porn star told him that quantum objects make his hands and cock look huge.

    5. Re:Wow maybe did something right for once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Although Quantum processors are unproven so far,

      Wrong, I think what you meant to say is universal quantum computers are unproven.
      Quantum Math co-processors, essentially what is done now, are proven to be better than classical computing.
      Adiabatic QC works very well. It's already used by several companies now. Big companies. Big, smart companies at that. Not some random cunt with a Wordpress moaning. (or was it blogspot?)
      We were just wrong at the qubit-counts required to outpace classical computing, which we thought were considerably smaller.

      Whether general purpose QC will ever arrive is... eh, I dunno if it will work.
      Some issues are inherently impracticable to do that way.
      Same issue with serial vs parallel, some tasks just cannot reliably be done over multiple distinct steps because one step absolutely relies on previous steps data to continue. But sometimes sub-steps in each step can be accelerated. Depends how complex they are. But really, that's playing with terminology if anything. Fact is, some tasks 100% rely on previous steps to function. You can't do step N if step B isn't done no matter how hard you try.
      At best, you can prepare some resources in advance, like reading a file in to RAM, opening a device, etc.
      Whether this will boost performance overall or if it is a detriment is probably dependent on workload in question.
      QC won't be able to accelerate that much unless preparing those resources can be accelerated too. Using the results of one step to sort of narrow down where data is likely to be in a large dataset before you finally get the full result of a further step, useful in fractal-related datasets or large science-project datasets, even machine-leaning.

      Even humans suffer with serial order problems. We can do parallel tasks brilliantly, but when you come to tasks that rely on previous information to continue, we slow to a crawl.
      It's just a problem in general that can't be overcome unless you start breaking the laws of physics and use time machines. Time-machine based computation throws a fuckhuge spanner in to the works. (if you ignore causality, that is!)

    6. Re:Wow maybe did something right for once by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I guess someone in Intelligence got through to Trump.

      I think it's more reasonable to assume he just likes signing things than assume someone changed his mind.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    7. Re:Wow maybe did something right for once by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Wait to see where the money goes. It sounds like corporate welfare. Who else but a low grade MBA could come up with a phrase like "quantum-smart workforce"?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re:Wow maybe did something right for once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, quantum computing is proven, although on a very small scale. You can even play and program one yourself online.

    9. Re:Wow maybe did something right for once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      the original funding was supposed to be only 200 million, but someone was able to explain to president pea-brain that quantum computers might be able to hack hillary's emails. trump immediately demanded another 1 billion to the project, and actually put his phone away as he signed the bill.

    10. Re:Wow maybe did something right for once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There isn't even an experiment with 4 qubits showing that they can store 16 analog values (2 ^ 4) like the physicists claim rather than the 12 analog values (3 * 4) they can actually store.

      I would expect people to start with that before worrying about anything else about a quantum computer.

      With 4 qubits it wouldn't be hard to give up a little signal-to-noise-ratio to encode 16 noisier values into 12 values, but up at 1000 qubits there would be way too much noise if 2 ^ 1000 noisier values were encoded into 3000 values, so the difference is critically important.

    11. Re:Wow maybe did something right for once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol I think you are right, but looking at your moderation scoring the suckers are buying into it.

    12. Re: Wow maybe did something right for once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Word salad.

    13. Re:Wow maybe did something right for once by epine · · Score: 1

      Not some random cunt with a Wordpress moaning. We were just wrong at the qubit-counts required to outpace classical computing, which we thought were considerably smaller.

      Is that the Royal We? Must be, because I sure don't think anyone else with a qubit chub is voluntarily sharing your misogynist tub.

      Major Quantum Computing Advance Made Obsolete by Teenager — 31 July 2018

      In the spring of 2017 Tang took a class on quantum information taught by Scott Aaronson, a prominent researcher in quantum computing. Aaronson recognized Tang as an unusually talented student and offered himself as adviser on an independent research project. Aaronson gave Tang a handful of problems to choose from, including the recommendation problem. Tang chose it somewhat reluctantly.

      Good lord. Aaronson is one of the few people in this field I actually respect, and even his best efforts to put some robust daylight in between QC and classical algorithms are not exactly stumping Terence Tao.

    14. Re: Wow maybe did something right for once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll see what I can do to make it simpler.

      Physicists say that a quantum computer with 1000 bits could store a really huge amount of numbers, more than a 1 with 300 0's after it. I say it can store 3000 numbers. That difference is so important that they should test it with 4 bits to see if it can store 16 numbers or 12 numbers. If it's 12, quantum computers will never work.

    15. Re: Wow maybe did something right for once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well-done.

    16. Re:Wow maybe did something right for once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For once? So far he has done everything right. Pissing off sensitive extremists by stopping extremely stupid and wastefull things is not doing something wrong.

  11. Maybe Trump does more "right" than you think. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Step outside of your echo chamber for once.

    1. Re: Maybe Trump does more "right" than you think. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh sweet summer child, rich people dont go to jail.

    2. Re: Maybe Trump does more "right" than you think. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell it to Paul Manafort when you see him, traitor.

    3. Re:Maybe Trump does more "right" than you think. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come get some, pansy.

    4. Re: Maybe Trump does more "right" than you think. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only traitor here is you. Those who oppose the President of the United States who was put in power by the will of the People of the United States deserve death.

    5. Re:Maybe Trump does more "right" than you think. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's only partially their fault they voted for Trump. Most of them are so desperate to 'stick it to the libtards' that they can't see past the end of their own noses, let alone what it's doing to the entire country. Add to that outside influencing and chaos-fostering and you get what we have today. Now, their pride is so great that it won't allow them to admit to anyone they were so, so wrong to vote for Trump, so they hold the line even though they can clearly see he's a complete loser and is destroying the country. Honestly though I think there needs to be basic competency tests for people before they're allowed to be registered voters, just to be sure they're living in reality and are rational, otherwise you get what we have today.

    6. Re:Maybe Trump does more "right" than you think. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just to be sure they're living in reality and are rational
       
      Considering what the two major parties consider "rational", I quiver just anticipating some of the crap you'd need to agree with to be considered as competent in their eyes.
       
      When are we going to stop acting like these two camps of buffoons represent the core of the American voters? I can't imagine anyone who voted in the last presidential election for either one of these criminals not having to feel shame for their actions.

    7. Re:Maybe Trump does more "right" than you think. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't vote for either of them, I feel no shame. However now that we know Trump IS a lying traitor, and HRC is no longer in government AT ALL, there's really no more "red vs blue" going on. It's Trump vs. America's laws.

      And he's losing, bigly.

    8. Re: Maybe Trump does more "right" than you think. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When his sham witch hunt is shut down, his "office" will be a 2x2 closet with a mop bucket and rags.

  12. Debt Solving Computers by QuadEddie · · Score: 1

    This is necessary to understand the full cascade impact of illegals flooding the country. Some estimate it's $60k per illegal of services drain on the economy, but a quantum computer will be able to solve these np hard problems quickly. (Or so Trump's been told)

    1. Re:Debt Solving Computers by DogDude · · Score: 1

      . Some estimate it's $60k per illegal of services drain on the economy

      Source?

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    2. Re:Debt Solving Computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Whoosh!*

    3. Re:Debt Solving Computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WHOOOOOOOSH!!

    4. Re:Debt Solving Computers by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Source?

      Quantum mechanics. The source ceases to exist when it is observed.

  13. Blockchain funding initiative when? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As long as we're throwing money away...

    1. Re:Blockchain funding initiative when? by PPH · · Score: 1

      Quantum blockchain FTW!

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  14. Re:What a fucking moron lol. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So true! He traded our cow for magic beans. I hope he rescues the princess. And the goose!

    You should not have been modded down.

  15. Well by DaMattster · · Score: 0

    How the fuck is he going to pay for it? All thos really great tax cuts fucked everything up. So now the tax burden is being put on the poor to pay for the rich man's fucking quantum computing. I am sick of paying for the rich man's programs. I am sick of fucking wealthcare.

    1. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mass immigration, whether illegal or via "legal" visas, is wealthcare. The rich get cheap labor and put Americans out of work and/or lower their wages.

      Yet for some reason this is a sacred cow. Anyone who even suggests a reduction is branded a racist. The-powers-that-be want their votes and their cheap labor.

    2. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those of us that work have to pay for those that don't wan't to work or don't have the right paperwork and get paid under the table.

  16. *checks glasses* by nickwinlund77 · · Score: 1

    Did trump just do something classy and innovative?

  17. In before by melted · · Score: 5, Funny

    WTF, I hate quantum computing now!

    1. Re:In before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is literally nothing to hate, it's all a theoretical pipe dream. They just keep sucking in more suckers with their false promises.

    2. Re:In before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's dipping bird power plants all the way down. We'll power our quantum computers with cold fusion, and then launch it to the stars with emDrive microwave engines. What amazes me is the lack of skepticism displayed by venture groups funding this pockey.

    3. Re:In before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF, I hate quantum computing now!

      I love and hate it at the same time, but if somebody asks me, I either love or hate it.

  18. Be best, Drumpftards! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Science that Trump likes, I like! Not bad liberal sciences like climate or economics, real science like computers made in Gyna!"

    1. Re: Be best, Drumpftards! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Economics a science? Lol, this is why nobody listens to you idiot libs.

    2. Re: Be best, Drumpftards! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now now. Economics is probably the most advanced and muddy science there is. It is the numerical equivalent of a swamp in biology.

      Liberalism should NEVER be compared to the science of economics. Any declaration of that sort will stand you out as an erudite, uneducated individual who should not be allowed in a voting booth. And there many just like you, so be assured of God's love for you, given your multitude and how readily your type spawn.

  19. Don't feed the Trumptard troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Largest deficit in 25 years, largest trade imbalance with China EVER, and largest new bailouts for US farmers in a single Presidency in US history. It's a shit show. Trump should flee back to Russia while he can, beg for asylum.

    The stock market lost another 650 points today because Trump can't shut his moronic traitor's bitching faggot mouth.

    1. Re:Don't feed the Trumptard troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are the troll.

  20. I refuse the animal threats. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's better to have 2 toys: one to be alive (still working) and another to be dead (not working).

    In the future, people will want Q-Machines for "Quantum Neural Training" as a part of Q-Machine Learning.

    A 4096 q-bits quantum computer is as 2*^4096 times faster than a classical computer for some kinds of problems but it does not guarantee NP = P.

    In the post-quantum cryptographic eras, the bigger keys are still the solution to the breakable problem.

    1. Re:I refuse the animal threats. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My girlfriend has two toys: one glass dildo she bought off Etsy, and one Hitachi Magic Wand she found at her aunt's house. Her aunt called it a "neck massager" and actually used it on her neck. The thought of where else she might have used it made us laugh, but whatever, it was free.

    2. Re: I refuse the animal threats. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how poor do you have to be to use a second hand erotic vibrator? :o

      im closer to poor than wealthy but i know for sure my wife would kill me if i brought her any used sex toy, no matter how it was used. And her legs would be crossed forver.

    3. Re: I refuse the animal threats. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dunk it in a bucket of bleach for a few minutes, rinse, repeat. Then tell her, "Don't worry about it..."

      Women will suck a dick (which you regularly urinate out of and probably don't wipe clean), do ass to mouth (need I say more?), and then get all antsy bout a used neck massager from their aunt? Sheesh.

  21. Trump has much in common with many ./ posters by AlanObject · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As he stated himself more than once, he firmly believes that he has an intuitive grasp of science that eclipses any career expert in any field.

    Since he doesn't read much I gather that his intuitions are pretty much based on whatever presentation he recently saw that impressed him. Maybe online or maybe someone who thinks they are talking to the president. Add to that add a healthy mix of preconceptions.

    What a recipe. It results in things like this sometimes.

    1. Re:Trump has much in common with many ./ posters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think the problem is so much whether or not one can have an intuitive grasp of science. For policy makers, the problem is how to spot rent-seeking in the scientific community - specifically the institutions. There's a lot of it about (the US national debt is now $15.8 trillion).

    2. Re:Trump has much in common with many ./ posters by iMadeGhostzilla · · Score: 0

      Trump doesn't understand any technology whatsoever. What he does is he reads people. I realized that some 15+ years ago when I watch an episode of Ali G trying to prank him. Trump saw through him in 10 seconds, patted him on the shoulder, said good luck to you and left. And Ali G is as good as they get.

    3. Re:Trump has much in common with many ./ posters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not american, so I have no beef in this trump thing, but I agree that a con-man should be good at reading other con-men, as they often employ the same tricks. I'm not surprised in the least that he read past Ali G.

    4. Re:Trump has much in common with many ./ posters by umafuckit · · Score: 1

      The interview is here. It doesn't look to me like Trump saw through the act. He looks more like he's fed up of having his time wasted by an idiot and wants to leave.

    5. Re:Trump has much in common with many ./ posters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He pulls the same thing with wanting to leave stuff with actual president stuff, like at the G20: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6450735/Get-Trump-wanders-G20-stage-leaves-Argentinas-President-hanging.html

  22. Meanwhile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Meanwhile, creimer admits his massive failure in 2018 with his youtube venture and other silly long tail schemes!

    After all, things might be getting better after all.

    Merry Christmas to you all!

  23. Re:What a fucking moron lol. by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1, Insightful

    But did they allow him to blather about the program for a while I hope, and is there video? Lol. What a fucking moron.

    I guess this means we now have to be against quantum computing.

    By the same token, after two years of the progressive enlightened telling us we have no business fighting in Syria, suddenly the same people are calling for a Middle Eastern forever war.

  24. That's going to be one very expensive by mark_reh · · Score: 1

    back door.

    Hmmm. Builds walls to keep people out, build back doors to let people in...

  25. It's about superposition by Required+Snark · · Score: 1
    Someone described superposition to him as a state where something could be true and false at the same time. He instantly applied this to himself and knew it would fix a bunch of his problems.

    1) No one could call him a liar because there is no such thing as true or false.

    2) No one could say he contradicted himself.

    3) He didn't have to 'walk back' anything he said.

    4) He could spout incomprehensible nonsense and have everyone except it.

    Unfortunately for everybody else on the planet, he's incapable of understanding that superpositions collapse and non-quantum reality is the result. That means things are true or false, contradictions need to be resolved, when you make unsupportable assertions people call you out, and nonsense has no meaning.

    That ominous sound you're starting to hear is the sound of the real world crashing in on TrumpWorld's quantum fantasy and starting to crush him and all the rest of up flat.

    --
    Why is Snark Required?
  26. National Quantum Coordination Office by 14erCleaner · · Score: 1

    As long as you don't open the door, they could be doing anything in there.

    --
    Have you read my blog lately?
  27. Trump funding basic research? by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    (3) provide research experiences and training for additional undergraduate and graduate students in quantum information science, including in the fields ofâ"

    (A) quantum information theory;
    (B) quantum physics;
    (C) quantum computational science;
    (D) applied mathematics and algorithm development;
    (E) quantum networking;
    (F) quantum sensing and detection; and
    (G) materials science and engineering;

    (4) coordinate research efforts funded through existing programs across the Department of Energy, includingâ"

    (A) the Nanoscale Science Research Centers;
    (B) the Energy Frontier Research Centers;
    (C) the Energy Innovation Hubs;
    (D) the National Laboratories;
    (E) the Advanced Research Projects Agency; and
    (F) the National Quantum Information Science Research Centers; and

    Hard to argue with that. Literally everything boils down to quantum processes. Deliberately understanding and exploiting quantum world has been at the very heart of progression of modern technology.

  28. I reviewed some of those proposals... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...for the Department of Energy, Office of Science, and man, they are shite, it is a competition about how to shoehorn your existing science in this QIS fad. I don't see this lasting more than a few year with very little to show. [posting as AC for obvious reasons]

  29. Re:What a fucking moron lol. by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 0

    You realize that in 2 years he's done more to get science research funded than the last 4 terms of democratic presidents combined, right? Oh, you can't hear me under all that sand, you say?

  30. Re:What a fucking moron lol. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are obviously either a Chinese bot or an NPC.

  31. Re: What a fucking moron lol. by Dan667 · · Score: 2

    Trump has no idea what he is doing.

  32. Idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yea, cutting taxes for the middle class is so wrong.
    Stopping illegals from coming in and killing US citizens, like Kate Stynley is wrong.
    Attempting to help the middle class instead of calling them all a bunch of meth head racists is wrong.

    Meanwhile...
    Jimmy Kimmel is making fun of a triple amputee war vet because he started a Go Fund Me page to help get the wall built.

    I guess supporting the middle class and wounded vets is the wrong side of the issues according to you. I'm find with my stance on things. Glad to see you hate people working to make the world a better place instead of bowing down to your superiority of making fun of wounded vets.

    Asshole

  33. Re: What a fucking moron lol. by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

    He is not a professional politician. It's too importand, and should be run by the professionals.

  34. Re: What a fucking moron lol. by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 0

    Whether or not that is true is irrelevant in the context of what I wrote.

  35. Where's the elephant graphic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Obama (or in an alternate universe, President Hillary Clinton) had done this, the story on Slashdot would have a patriotic Democrat mascot graphic.

    On the plus side, like him or hate him, Trump is clearly working to address a serious problem in America: Most of our politicians, whether Democrat or Republican, whether Obama or Trump, or Clinton, or Schumer, can speak out of both sides of their mouths on any issue and so fast nobody can be entirely sure of where they stand. Trump himself frequently contradicts himself in stream-of-conscience speeches and twitter postings.We, the people, might well be in need of quantum computing just to figure out where any of these people stand on any particular issue in any moment in time. Indeed, it seems that the positions most of these politicians take on an issue can be affected by whether somebody observes them - Heisenburg would be thrilled.

  36. Sounds good, no by Sqreater · · Score: 1

    Let me know when it works. Let me know when it does anything useful. Let me know when it doesn't feel like a boondoggle.

    --
    E Proelio Veritas.
  37. Thanks Obama! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... oh, wait... nevermind.

  38. Maybe he wants a Quantum block-chain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for the Space Force - lol

    1. Re:Maybe he wants a Quantum block-chain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      paid for by aliens

  39. TDS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The unbridled irrational raw hate is ridiculous and mentally unhealthy.

    If Obama had done this you would be all woot woot! about how great a president Obama is and how those anti science republicans cant stop Obama from dragging them into the quantum future.

    But Trunp did it so you have to pee all over yourself like an undiapered 3 year old.

    You are only funny to your equally infantile echo chamber friends. The adults sigh and eye roll.

  40. Re:What a (The newly discovered new Qbit)! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So I guess the best way to get the shrodinger cats to cooperate better is to feed them "kibbles -n- bits"......

  41. Re: What a fucking moron lol. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah yes, we hear from the Eurofag contingent. The very concept of a professional politician is sickening to people who like freedom and want to control their government, not be ruled by it.

  42. Re: What a fucking moron lol. by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

    I miss the existence of a sarcasm tag.