Slashdot Mirror


Google Chrome's New UI is Ugly, And People Are Very Angry (zdnet.com)

Catalin Cimpanu, writing for ZDNet: Every major user interface (UI) redesign project is a hit and miss game, and Google's new Chrome UI appears to be a colossal miss. Designed with mobile devices in mind, the new Chrome user interface style was officially rolled out in September this year, with the release of Chrome version 69. Not all users liked the new UI, and this was clear from the beginning, with some users voicing their discontent online even back then. However, those users who didn't appreciate the new lighter-toned Chrome interface had the option to visit the chrome://flags page and modify a Chrome setting and continue using Chrome's older UI.

But with Chrome version 71, released earlier this month, Google has removed the Chrome flag that allowed users to use the old UI. As you might imagine, this change did not go well, at all. Chrome's new UI might have been developed with a mobile-first approach in mind, but the UI is problematic on laptops and desktops, where its lighter tone and rounded tabs make it extremely hard to distinguish tabs from one another, especially when users open multiple tabs. Since being able to distinguish and switch between tabs at a fast pace is an important detail in most of today's internet-based jobs, many users have been having trouble adapting to the new UI both at work and at home, especially if they're the kind of people who deal with tens of tabs at the same time.

17 of 294 comments (clear)

  1. Getting tired of this by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not specific to Chrome, but - why does "mobile first" generally seem to consistently result in "crappy everywhere"?

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re: Getting tired of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It is also designed for people to use in one hand with their thumbs, which doesn't translate well for power users that insist on using a full keyboard and mouse

    2. Re:Getting tired of this by rainmouse · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah it's painful, especially because all white is sooo great for power usage on mobiles. :(
      I don't know a single mobile website that's not vastly improved by forcing mobile browser to use desktop version.

    3. Re:Getting tired of this by cheekyboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A msg to YOU CEOS and underling UI coders ;

      Your work is shit, you are shit, you are useless and all your work will be undone in a few years, ufck you.

      Just boot a 2010 Mac, and look at OSX 10.6 , oh wow, so pretty, so nice, so cute, fucking sweet ass bitch.

      All these modern shit, made by simpletons newbies is crap. Might have been ok in 1998 with crap hardware.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    4. Re:Getting tired of this by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My guess is that the new guys have no idea how to make a proper interface. And to complicate things they discard the current interfaces (products of decades of improvements) because they are "obsolete" for them, not "shiny and new".

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    5. Re:Getting tired of this by bjwest · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ... and I have no idea where you'd go to directly tell Google your opinion on the matter.

      Using Firefox is my choice to state my opinion to Google about Chrome.

      --

      --- Keep the choice with the user..
    6. Re:Getting tired of this by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Flat interfaces SUCK.

      One of the things that made Windows 3 UI so likeable was that the interface actually looked like things people recognized, like buttons. People instantly got it- this thing that looked like a button could be clicked or pushed to do something.

      Now everything is a flat fucking rectangle, who knows if it's a label, a status indicator, a button, a decoration, or whatever the fuck else there is.

      I mean, why the fuck have a button that doesn't remotely resemble an actual, pushable button?

      And don't get me started on the hipster trend of "discoverable" interfaces. Fuck that shit, just give me a goddamn menu and let me get some shit done. I do NOT want to have to "discover" your fucking interface, that's the opposite of good design.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    7. Re:Getting tired of this by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I still design with Skeuomorphism. While not in fashion, we are pushing on figurative buttons and I've seen precious few buttons in the real world that are flat, shadowless monochromatic tiles. The trick is to make it fairly subtle

      The attack on Skeuomorphism was led by people without the skills to design that way. Flat is easier. That is my theory.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  2. Huh? by dohzer · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I haven't noticed anything. Just opened "Help -> About" and I have "Version 71.0.3578.98 (Official Build) (64-bit)". My phone is v71 too. Is this some Apple thing?

  3. I never saw a problem... by Tomahawk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I use Chrome both in work and at home. I would end up having a lot of tabs open in work, especially. I've never seen any if the issues being described here. Nor heard anyone in work complain. So I really don't get this...

    Is this maybe just one person trying to find a reason to rant because they just don't like change, no matter how small, and are blowing stuff out of proportion?

    1. Re:I never saw a problem... by dissy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I use Chrome both in work and at home. I would end up having a lot of tabs open in work, especially. I've never seen any if the issues being described here. Nor heard anyone in work complain. So I really don't get this...

      So is it if anyone has an opinion not matching your own, it's invalid?
      Otherwise I don't get your post either.

      Is this maybe just one person trying to find a reason to rant because they just don't like change, no matter how small, and are blowing stuff out of proportion?

      I know five people personally, one of which is me. So the answer to that is no.

      With aging eyesight and 40 years worth of muscle memory knowing the title bar is for moving windows, the latest UI change completely breaks flow and makes a mess of the tabs nearly defeating the entire point of them.

      There is 4 pixels worth of blue at the very top of the title bar that functions to move the browser window. Anywhere below that in the exact same colored blue is a tab.
      So the normal process of clicking in the title bar and dragging the window where you need it turns into chrome thinking I am clicking on a tab and dragging just it where I wanted the entire browser to be.
      Sometimes this results in that tab detaching and becoming its own window, other times it just results in reordering the tabs.

      If that is going to be the new behavior, it would be far faster and efficient to go back to individual windows and pretend the one tab in each window doesn't exist.
      At least that way the same end result will already be there and expected, and at least it won't change the order of the windows in the task bar, or require retraining how the title bar works for a single app and the decades old behavior in all others.

    2. Re:I never saw a problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The thing about UI design: doing anything your own clever way is bad, stupid and wrong. The right way is always "the way the user expects".

      And now you know the difference between UI and UX:

      UI: User Interface. The means by which the user interacts with the computer
      UX: User eXperience. The means by which the marketing department shows off how trendy they are to potential advertisers.

  4. When I was learning the ropes of programming... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...everyone told us to use the system theme when drawing UI widgets and such. What changed?

  5. Teletubby interfaces and information density by shatteredsilicon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The thing that this particular teletubby interface update broke is information density. After the update, the new skin in both gmail and calendar quite simply puts less on a screen. On the desktop it is annoying. On the mobile devices with limited screen real estate, it is downright devastating for usage and productivity.

    It's as if since the turn of the century, user interfaces have been continuously redesigned to be more and more friendly toward children under 2 - with rounded corners and buttons too big to accidentally swallow. It's as if Fischer Price have been contracted to do user interface designs ever since.

  6. Google = shit, and cannot be trusted, period. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Anyone who willingly uses Google products is asking for either disappointment or betrayal.

    How many times does Google have to arbitrarily kill off "products" before you cretins GET IT ?

    Be quick now, and mod this post down because it threatens your sad little self image as a willing user of shit ( Google ) products.

  7. modern UI are puzzles by e**(i+pi)-1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    maybe that UI designers come from the gaming industry. They design puzzles. Once one get used to things, hide the toolbar, hide the scrolling bars, hide and seek is the new trend. That is what games are for: find the treasure! Find the current URL, fine the place to print, jackpot. Even when reading stories, the pictures have to appear dynamically, nonlinear story telling makes even reading a text feel like running through a maze. Maybe one has to swipe left, maybe down, maybe click. Just add a few adds, which attack from random sides and we are in a full blown computer game. Sometimes, one really misses the simplicity of the 90ies.

  8. The new UI *is* ugly? by reboot246 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No, Google Chrome's UI has *always* been ugly. The shame is they won't let users change it easily. I use Chrome for only a handful of websites that simply don't work very well with other browsers. I can't imagine having to use it all of the time.