Slashdot Mirror


Apple's AirPower, Unveiled in September 2017, Officially Misses 2018 Shipping Deadline (9to5mac.com)

From a 9to5Mac report: As the new year begins in Pacific Time, where Apple's Cupertino headquarters are based, the AirPower charging mat has officially missed its 2018 release window. The charging mat promised to charge iPhone, Apple Watch and AirPods on a single compact mat with flexibility on where devices can be placed. However, the product has been rumored to have faced internal development challenges as late as this past summer, which prevented Apple from bringing the product to market as smoothly as it expected.

[...] Unusually, Apple has not provided a statement to press with an update on AirPower's status. Apple refused to acknowledge the product at its September and October events, and has not responded to press requests for comment at the end of December. The product therefore enters 2019 still in limbo.

137 comments

  1. Does it really deliver power over the air? by Spy+Handler · · Score: 0

    Nikola Tesla is rolling in his grave...

    1. Re: Does it really deliver power over the air? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Why

    2. Re: Does it really deliver power over the air? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It delivers shitload of smug over the air.

    3. Re: Does it really deliver power over the air? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wrap a coil around tesla's body, do something that would make him roll in his grave, and then get free power!

  2. AirPower - worse than a wire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bluetooth headphones - worse than a wire.

    Clearly Apple is learning from its past mistakes ...

    1. Re:AirPower - worse than a wire by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      In any case it hasn't missed it's 2018 shipping window at all, there's still plenty of chance for it to ship in in Quindecember or even Vigintiseptember 2018.

    2. Re: AirPower - worse than a wire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh boy, talk about the most maligned fall guy apple exec at this point still smiling showing up to work before anyone else leaving after everyone else doing the work a bunch of other lazy people ought to have been doing and never a single complaint their boss literally never imagined how lucky they were

    3. Re: AirPower - worse than a wire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple is not above throwing a bunch of elbows around

  3. A theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple wanted to increase buzz by letting the constant stream of Apple Haters have a few more months of giving them free press by trash talking them.

    Discuss.

    1. Re: A theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um no. Apple is not interested in haters at all. Officially is the important word here. Apple needs to hire the FAA now because its an âoeairâ charger. Hmmm

    2. Re: A theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck is ÃoeairÃ?

    3. Re: A theory by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      The sign of someone who can't figure out his iDevice.

    4. Re: A theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be new here. Newbies always like to tell posters how to solve paradoxes

    5. Re: A theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Donâ(TM)t blame users for /. not being able to build a working fucking website. I refuse to change my settings because no other site has this problem. Fix your shit

    6. Re: A theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You're holding it wrong again.

    7. Re: A theory by _merlin · · Score: 0

      Slashdot's aversion to most things other than 7-bit ASCII is well-known. Why visit and post at the site if you aren't prepared to deal with its well-known constraints?

    8. Re: A theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      7-bit ASCII. Keeping Slashdot Great Again.

      Capcha: frauds (!)

    9. Re: A theory by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      I suspect Slashdot is harder to change than turning off "smart" quotes in your keyboard settings but if you're happy with people here laughing at you then keep that setting you don't need.

    10. Re: A theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That quote refers to a device failing under usage conditions which should be within the expected range for the device.

      A "free" website which has been around long enough that its current codebase existed prior to the "glitch" being caused by a newer device, is not a "you're holding it wrong scenario". Given that neither the device, nor the website has failed, it would seem to be a PEBCAK issue. Like inserting CD-ROMs into a floppy disk drive...

      Interestingly, none of my iDevices suffer the ID-10-T issue of sending incompatible quotes to legacy sites.

  4. Or.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Just don't give us constant updates on this sh**. Seriously, why is it journalists feel we need updates on all of Apple's stock movements constantly. Does anyone care about this, and is anyone surprised N

    1. Re:Or.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You confused people bitching on the internet to actual journalism. Nobody here, the editors at slashdot, 9to5 Mac, or really anywhere have journalistic credentials anymore. Those writing the articles (assuming they are not bots) have English or speech comm degrees at best. Unemployable except as gadflies on websites generating clickbait articles. $200K in debt and making $40k per year writing crap.

  5. I think Apple dropped it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is this even a story? Any common sense person would realize Apple decided not to release it for whatever reason. Was not even mentioned in the last iPhone event.

    1. Re:I think Apple dropped it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They didn't drop it... they were holding it wrong.

    2. Re: I think Apple dropped it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason is no one has invented yet for apple to copy and claim they invented it.

    3. Re: I think Apple dropped it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah they say that is not happening because they want Apple to fail, that is really all there is to it. Easily exposed hucksters digging their own graves

    4. Re: I think Apple dropped it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple funds something and improves it. The solution has already been invented, it is that Tesla charging tentacle robot. Apple just needs to do the same for a phone.

    5. Re:I think Apple dropped it by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      They can't drop it since it doesn't exist.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  6. Is based. Where the HQ is based. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only literate person here?

  7. Feckless hiptards by Hognoxious · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Charging mat - for people who are too lazy & feckless to plug in a cable.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:Feckless hiptards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or just for people who are fed up with damaged chargeports and cables..

    2. Re:Feckless hiptards by sheramil · · Score: 0

      Or just for people who can afford to waste power by running a tiny radio station that spews EM in all directions, some of it reaching the devices they want to charge.

    3. Re:Feckless hiptards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only cables I see regularly damaged are apple ones due to their entire lack of sensible cable end grommets. I see them almost every day, always frayed in the same location, right after the hard rubber ring by the plug/adapter. It's shocking they have not improved this in 15 years.

    4. Re: Feckless hiptards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And no thanks to anyone

    5. Re:Feckless hiptards by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 0

      Apple should learn from those unboxers on YouTube who go "ohh, braided cables" when opening a box. They say that for a reason.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    6. Re:Feckless hiptards by TeknoHog · · Score: 2

      I'm pretty sure these charging mats use some kind of induction, which doesn't spew EM radiation all over. Still more wasteful than plugging in, though.

      I don't really understand the benefit of these, since it won't reduce cable clutter around your desk. I guess one might make sense if one charger replaces lots of small ones in a workplace etc. Otherwise, it sounds about as useful as a Wifi AP that only works within touching distance.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    7. Re:Feckless hiptards by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      That's not how these things work. The losses are small, about 10-15%.
      My new car will have one, which is nice. Sure beats fiddling with a cable.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    8. Re:Feckless hiptards by BitZtream · · Score: 0

      We exist because of a ball of matter radiating EM in all directions, some of it reaching our planet and powering life here. You may have heard of it, we call it 'the sun'

      Try not to be so melodramatic, increasing entropy in the universe is the only option, fortunately there is enough available that the human mind can't even fathom the length of time its going to take to run out of useful entropy.

      For reference however, wireless charging works pretty much exactly and just as efficiently as that wall wart you use to convert the outlets 120/240 volt energy down to the 5 or so you phone wants to charge with using that cable . . . so before you freak out about the wireless charging matt that doesn't actually emit very much EM until something is placed on it because it negotiates power output with devices laying on it ...

      Worry about the wall wart hooked to that cable powering your phone ... which is emitting wasted EM the entire time its plugged into the wall at a much higher level than your charging matt, even if the phone isn't plugged in. (And yes, I'm momentarily ignoring that the power matt uses a wall wart as well.

      You can get all uppity and act like wireless charging is some horrible thing, but all it does is shows your ignorance of physics. The wall wart is an order of magnitude more wasteful than the charging matt, so worry about removing the hundreds of those step down transformers embedded in pretty much every electric device you own that doesn't run off batteries (and some that do!) before you worry about a power matt.

      You're one of those guys that brags about driving a Pruis cause its efficient and good for the environment while powering it from coal and oil power plants aren't you?

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    9. Re: Feckless hiptards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I priced an all in one cable recently. I have a very cluttered desk, apparently. Even though I could see an easy way to buy one, bring it home, and then swap it out for all these other darn things, the maid told me to clean my desk first. I know, why is the maid telling me to clean my desk? Im not sure, but I think she is allergic to dust and wont start cleaning until I give her a clean room to start with. I can be found wandering the cleaning supplies aisle at the grocery store. And nothing is priced

    10. Re: Feckless hiptards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha my wall wart is irreparably broken. I can force it in to the wall but it wouldnâ(TM)t work and just damage the wall and the wart (I would probably hurt my finger as well) it is good to see that you have actually put some thought into this so bozos who have no charting system at all can rush off and buy air pads. Are you supposed to recycle the wall warts or put them straight in the garbage? Seems like a lot of very good metal going to waste if it was put in the garbage. Our recyclers do not come very often

    11. Re: Feckless hiptards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very sad but very true

    12. Re: Feckless hiptards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh and yes, I have heard of the sun. It should be rising very soon. I recommend looking at the sky if you are the least bit skeptical of its existence

    13. Re: Feckless hiptards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... shitty cables, "designed" in california.

    14. Re:Feckless hiptards by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      They save wear on the charge port, and I bet Apple is moving towards a phone with no ports at all eventually.

      Also very useful for cars because you don't need cables trailing all over the place. Some cars have the charging mat built in now so you literally just put your phone in the provided holder and that's it. All they need to do now is get Android Auto working wirelessly too, although for now you can do stuff like have the Bluetooth auto-enable and disable.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    15. Re: Feckless hiptards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And cables can get pinched (ouch) and yes I have Bluetooth set to auto enable and disable. It is a very good feature. All my so called friends think it is stupid. I guess I need new friends

    16. Re:Feckless hiptards by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      I use wireless charging mostly doe to the fact that I don’t damage my cable and connector.
      Over the past 22 years of cell phones.
      The first one I replaced because of a cracked screen.
      The second one was because the charging connector on the phone got corroded.
      The third one the charging cord broke and couldn’t get a compatible charging cord anymore.
      The forth one went threw the wash
      The fifth one (the original iphone) actually still works but just outdated.
      The sixth one charging connector was loose and failing home button
      The seventh one the battery failed to keep its charge.
      And I am on my eighth phone now.

      The cable charging is the weak spot on the phone for almost all make and models.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    17. Re: Feckless hiptards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should stop buying apple phones. It sounds like they are just crap

    18. Re:Feckless hiptards by omnichad · · Score: 1

      It's a very short distance, and possibly the reason it's taking so long is that they plan to use some sort of beamforming from the multiple antennae. It seems very logical to try this, but completely crazy to announce what turned out to be an unfinished product that hasn't made it out of R&D yet.

    19. Re:Feckless hiptards by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Induction means to induce current with generated EM emissions. It's generally pretty efficient, but it's not an inaccurate description.

    20. Re: Feckless hiptards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Herm I wonder how well those built in chargers will wour over the lifetume of the vehicle, when phones will adopt a new standard two yeats from now..

    21. Re: Feckless hiptards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or for people who just want to put their phones somewhere as they get ready for work...

    22. Re:Feckless hiptards by JBMcB · · Score: 1

      I don't really understand the benefit of these, since it won't reduce cable clutter around your desk.

      They want to get rid of every port and make the case completely sealed. Much easier to make them waterproof / dustproof / etc...

      --
      My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    23. Re: Feckless hiptards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you just need a stunt double who sits in the back with them and kind of enlightens them on why your choices make sense.

    24. Re: Feckless hiptards by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Exactly... I've never had any of this happen, going on 10 Android devices now in the whole family.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    25. Re:Feckless hiptards by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      "spews EM in all directions" is inaccurate not because it's not EM but because it's not "in all directions" and it doesn't "spew". Furthermore, a charging mat is not accurately described as a "tiny radio station" nor is is it "just for people who can afford to waste power" by operating such a relatively useless "radio station". In summary, the entire description is inaccurate except for EM being involved, the one thing you zeroed in on.

      Also, your definition of "induction" is inaccurate.

    26. Re:Feckless hiptards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Much easier to prevent evil, revenue-stealing 3rd party repairs.

      Much easier with an opaque blackbox with no provisions to access the internals. Plus, they can spin it as a "value added feature" because their greedy, backward design has the unimpressive side-effect of making it even MORE "waterproof / dustproof / etc", a feature that elaborate timepieces and deep-sea electronics casings have had for years.

    27. Re:Feckless hiptards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So all these aggressive laws demanding more efficient lighting & vehicles will ultimately have their benefits cancelled out by stupid hipsters deliberately wasting electricity "for convenience". Perfect.

    28. Re:Feckless hiptards by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      The loss per charger is like 2W. Compared the the gains made in vehicles and light bulbs (60W incandescents to 7W LEDs), that's a rounding error.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    29. Re:Feckless hiptards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They want to get rid of every port and make the case completely sealed. Much easier to make them waterproof / dustproof / etc...

      I wish imagination free nerds out there would quit wanking their brand wars. So let me help you younglings out here.

      It makes it possible to encase all the electronics, antennas, lenses, and speakers in a beautiful solid block of Lucite. Like a big watermelon Jolly Rancher. Or grape. Or cherry. Or...apple. Repairs are unnecessary because few people actually repair their phone; they use it as an excuse to buy a new phone. People used to darn socks too but...

      You heard it here first, and I'm getting tired of pointing these things out to those who have no imagination. (Which is why they're buyers and not creators.)

    30. Re:Feckless hiptards by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      The forth one went threw the wash

      You chucked one off a bridge in Scotland and it landed in Lincolnshire?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    31. Re:Feckless hiptards by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      I have a master's degree in physics so I could probably explain a thing or two about the differences between EM waves (radiation) and inductive charging. Or maybe you could look it up somewhere like Wikipedia, instead of spewing around any inaccurate emissions.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    32. Re:Feckless hiptards by omnichad · · Score: 1

      And what exactly do you think induction is, then?

    33. Re:Feckless hiptards by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Oh, and feel free to cite the Wikipedia article on EM induction.

    34. Re: Feckless hiptards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Qi standard has been around for a decade now.

    35. Re:Feckless hiptards by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      EM waves do induce currents, that's how radio reception works. But EM waves are not used for inductive charging, because of the obvious waste of energy.

      Inductive chargers involve what's basically a transformer in two parts: one coil (the charger) is used to generate an oscillating magnetic field, which induces current in another coil (the phone).

      EM waves/radiation are a rather special case where electric and magnetic fields oscillate together, basically inducing each other to make the wave go on. But you can have oscillating fields and induction without the EM wave mechanism.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    36. Re:Feckless hiptards by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Near field EM is still an EM wave. And it's still coupled with the fluctuating electric field in the coil. It's just that since the near field radiation is what's important, there is not enough power to generate significant amounts of far field.

    37. Re:Feckless hiptards by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure these charging mats use some kind of induction, which doesn't spew EM radiation all over.

      Yes it does, whatever gave you the idea that induction doesn't leak EMF? Hint: induction = EMF.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    38. Re:Feckless hiptards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shouldn't you be tending to the next customer at the Geek Squad counter?

    39. Re:Feckless hiptards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's bitztream the autism-hating, custom EpiPen-hating, Musk-hating, Qualcomm-hating, Firefox tabs-hating, Slashdot editors-hating Slashdot troll!

    40. Re: Feckless hiptards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Nokia branded Qi charger sitting next to my bed has been in service since 2012, across 6 different phone models... and is still going strong.

    41. Re: Feckless hiptards by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      If they were smart they would have plugged the phone into the charger the previous night before they went to sleep. Ta-da! Wake up to a fully charged phone ready for the day, and you get better battery longevity since you can slow-charge it overnight instead of fast-charging it the next day.

    42. Re:Feckless hiptards by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 0

      The only cables I see regularly damaged are apple ones due to their entire lack of sensible cable end grommets. I see them almost every day, always frayed in the same location, right after the hard rubber ring by the plug/adapter. It's shocking they have not improved this in 15 years.

      Yep; by retarded users that don't know how to treat a cable properly. I have yet to have an Apple cable fail at the strain relief, and that includes the still-used-every-day 30-pin dock/charging cable for my iPad 2.

      Hint: Pull the cable out by the connector-body; don't pull it out like a frickin' WEED, and you'll have no problems.

    43. Re:Feckless hiptards by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure these charging mats use some kind of induction, which doesn't spew EM radiation all over. Still more wasteful than plugging in, though.

      I don't really understand the benefit of these, since it won't reduce cable clutter around your desk. I guess one might make sense if one charger replaces lots of small ones in a workplace etc. Otherwise, it sounds about as useful as a Wifi AP that only works within touching distance.

      Apple's idea of having a multi-device mat, which IMHO, is also what has made the Project stall, is actually a better idea than multiple charger cables/adapters hanging around.

      But I agree in general about wireless chargers; way too inefficient, and actually "anti-green".

    44. Re:Feckless hiptards by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      "ElectroMagnetic Field". Moron.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    45. Re:Feckless hiptards by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      But, considering the field strength falls off exponentially with distance

      It does not.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    46. Re:Feckless hiptards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "ElectroMagnetic Field". Moron.

      [Posting as AC because it has only been a month since my last post]

      I guess we're both right, actually.

      https://acronyms.thefreedictionary.com/EMF

    47. Re:Feckless hiptards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [Posting as AC because it has only been a year since my last Post]

      But, considering the field strength falls off exponentially with distance

      It does not.

      You are correct. I KNEW that didn't look right when I typed it; but stupid me, I didn't verify it.

      It actually follows the "Inverse Square Law".

      Different; but still pretty much comes down to "The field-strength falls off pretty darn fast with distance".

      https://www.instructables.com/id/Evaluate-magnetic-field-variation-with-distance/

    48. Re:Feckless hiptards by Agripa · · Score: 1

      Apple should learn from those unboxers on YouTube who go "ohh, braided cables" when opening a box. They say that for a reason.

      But how do you make a shiny braided cable which is hard on the eyes?

  8. Not unexpected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, Apple is used to refining tech developed by others and assembling it in something "stylish". So it is not shocking that they have issues developing something relativelly new. Give them some time...

  9. Sounds like the Reality Distortion field by bobstreo · · Score: 1

    is starting to have a negative impact on delivery dates. /s

    1. Re: Sounds like the Reality Distortion field by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All delivery dates are void and there never were any to begin with.

    2. Re:Sounds like the Reality Distortion field by markdavis · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yep.

      And that last article about people not willing to pay Apple's insane prices anymore is amusing. And the article before about them eying 3D cameras, although phones have already done that. And Apple users laughing at phones with fingerprint sensors, then Apple "inventing" it. And laughing at large-screen phones, then "inventing" it. And laughing at the capacitive Samsung S Pen, then "inventing" the concept with the Apple Pencil. Other companies were first with OLED displays, wireless charging, optical stabilization, touch screens, smart watches, keyboard covers, zoom pinching, face ID, removal of home button, slim bezels, dual rear cameras, RFID payments, water resistance... but the distortion field says that either Apple invented them or somehow only Apple could make it work right.

      But let's give them credit- they were among the first with no headphone jack, non-user-replaceable batteries, and strange cut-out areas on the display.

    3. Re: Sounds like the Reality Distortion field by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The missing headphone jack is so they could put a mini CPU in that enhances the display by sending the signal from the center of the screen out. At least thats what I thought immediately when I first heard the news

    4. Re: Sounds like the Reality Distortion field by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet another slashdot whiner who canâ(TM)t grasp that âoeworks wellâ is far more important than being âoefirstâ.

    5. Re: Sounds like the Reality Distortion field by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do feel I must say amen

    6. Re: Sounds like the Reality Distortion field by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup. Literally nothing but misinformation and nonsense for a very long time. And they have some of the worst territorial editors. At least we know who is in charge of Apple, for better or for worse, unless we still have people praying to the ghost of Steve Jobs

    7. Re: Sounds like the Reality Distortion field by markdavis · · Score: 1

      >"Yet another slashdot whiner who canÃ(TM)t grasp that Ãoeworks wellà is far more important than being ÃoefirstÃ."

      And yet, I have used examples of all of those technologies, working very well, in various non-Apple phones, before Apple "invented" them. So, sorry, that doesn't fly.

    8. Re: Sounds like the Reality Distortion field by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet another slashdot whiner who canâ(TM)t discern 'Samsung works' from 'actually works'.

    9. Re:Sounds like the Reality Distortion field by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best part is that with this delay, there are now two generations of iPhones that have less battery space to make room for the wireless charging hardware that no Apple user can use because Apple use yet to release their proprietary wireless charging mat.

      It's pretty funny if you think about it.

    10. Re:Sounds like the Reality Distortion field by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apples phones work on any wireless changing mat you stupid retard.

    11. Re:Sounds like the Reality Distortion field by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      But let's give them credit- they were among the first with [...] strange cut-out areas on the display.

      They weren't the first with that.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    12. Re:Sounds like the Reality Distortion field by markdavis · · Score: 1

      >"They weren't the first with that."

      That is why I said they were "among the first"...

    13. Re: Sounds like the Reality Distortion field by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >"Yet another slashdot whiner who canÃ(TM)t grasp that Ãoeworks wellà is far more important than being ÃoefirstÃ."

      And yet, I have used examples of all of those technologies, working very well, in various non-Apple phones, before Apple "invented" them. So, sorry, that doesn't fly.

      AMEN!

      And many many more that never came to iPhones and likely never will... qwerty, IR, removeable battery, SD cards, smart docks to name a few

      When an Android device gets a new feature, an iPhone gets one removed while all the iSheeps cheer and rushed to the nearest Apple store to buy a phone that is even more expensive than the last and has even fewer functions that their current iPhone...

      Sadly some Android makers are copying the feature remove and price insanity as well

       

    14. Re:Sounds like the Reality Distortion field by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and strange cut-out areas on the display.

      Actually they copied that design from Essential, nowadays even their designs aren't original.

  10. Re: A reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My penis. Your mouth.

    Discuss.

  11. Development Issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Apple delayed because they couldn't find a way to make it incompatible with any other wireless charging system.

    1. Re:Development Issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard that one of the project leads burst several capillary vessels from laughing so hard at the retail markup. Quoted as saying: "it's just a fucking copper coil!" right before the incident.

    2. Re:Development Issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's an Apple product so he should have expected it.

      Obviously, it's going to be an over-charging system.

  12. Re:Is based. Where the HQ is based. by ledow · · Score: 4, Informative

    You're not.

    Headquarters is derived from head quarters (the quarters - living areas - of the people leading the organisation).

    Quarters is the plural of quarter.

    "The word is plural in construction and can take singular or plural verbs."

    Thus "headquarters is" and "headquarters are" are both perfectly valid English (depending where you live) while the obvious plural (ending in 's') will tend to lead people to use it as a plural instead of singular.

    There is not one "headquarter". Nobody uses that term except US English. There is one set of "headquarters". Though language evolves, the plural is the original, just as valid today, and more common worldwide.

  13. Re: Is based. Where the HQ is based. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you for the lesson

  14. dear author... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the term you're looking for is "vaporware".

    1. Re:dear author... by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      What do you mean? AirVapor or VaporPower?

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  15. Class Action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When does it become eligible for misleading advertising? I purchased a new iPhone and AirPods, in part, because I liked the idea of a single wireless charging platform.

    1. Re: Class Action by ElitistWhiner · · Score: 1

      Somewhere between _vaporware â" exclusive_ is a concept. If I had to guess⦠itâ(TM)s simply * unsupportable * at this stage. SO Apple AirPOWER doesnâ(TM)t exist but the marketers are first to blame.

  16. uBeam ?... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Speaking of slipping bullshit, how is uBeam going ? Another success storey headed by a strong, independent woman socking it to " The Man" !

    At least Apples inductive loop charging will actually work without 99.9% losses......

    1. Re: uBeam ?... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isnâ(TM)t uBeam always on the verge of collapse? Gotta love that group

    2. Re:uBeam ?... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Meredith stepped down as CEO, and they have pivoted to trying to license what they have learned so far... No longer looking to make product. I've been doubtful about them from the beginning, mainly because an incredibly efficient audio transducer is about 3% efficient - and you have that loss both ways. With huge arrays of transmitters and receivers, and heavy focusing, you maybe can bump that up to 10% each way - which means about 1% overall. 100W of acoustic power to get 1W of charging power.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  17. Spite much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was the author watching the clock with trembling hands hoping Apple would fail on a deadline?

    1. Re:Spite much? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      The author is a moron. I knew as far back as 2025 that Apple would never ship AirPower in time.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:Spite much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      apple is a joke. Its important to have a good laugh once in a while. Its even funnier with all the brain dead apple worshipper remarks when this was announced that it was going to to be "revolutionary" and "sell like hotcakes"; you know, the typical apple cultist drivel.

    3. Re:Spite much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The author is a moron. I knew as far back as 2025 that Apple would never ship AirPower in time.

      Hey... Marty McFly.. this is the year 2019... What about all that talk about screwing up future events?

      Nice of Apple to eventually make AirPower available to Apple AirHeads that are also using AirStations, AirPods, Macbook Airs and lots of warm Air....

      And if they ship it maybe sometime in 2050, then they would only be 42 years behind the competition (the Qi standard is from 2008)

      naturally the world will still ignore any existing wireless charging tech including Qi at that point, because as soon as Apple finally puts out a product with ancient technology.. uh sorry...as soon as they "INVENT" a "NEW" product... then they are suddently magically the inventors of that technology.. any priort art, prior tech and products suddently disappear from the world due to the Apple reality distortion field

      when the product then fails or works maybe half as good as the prior art that was ignored by Apple and its fans... then Apple tells users that they are holding it wrong and the users are happy with the knowledge that is them and not the mighty Apple who are iNcompetent

       

  18. Re:Is based. Where the HQ is based. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, there IS one "headquarter".

    It just happens to be a verb instead of a noun.

  19. Re:Is based. Where the HQ is based. by dfghjk · · Score: 1

    "The word is plural in construction ..."

    This makes no sense. "quarters" is plural but that doesn't make "headquarters" plural, "headquarters" being a specific one (the head one) of the quarters. There could be one or more "head" quarters, therefore the "construction" is ambiguous.

    '"There is not one "headquarter". '

    No, but there could be one "headquarters", as above.

    "Though language evolves, the plural is the original..."

    A misreading of the origin of the word.

  20. Re: A reality by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 0

    How is he supposed to discuss with your penis in his mouth?

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  21. Available now ! by speedlaw · · Score: 1

    Scanning the options sheet for Mercedes...a charging mat is an option.....

  22. That's some next level Apple Hater messaging by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    I think it's absurd to beat up Apple over the inability to ship a charging mat that they mentioned just once!! Come on, was it really a huge problem for Apple they could not ship something that you can buy a score of near equivalent products for?

    If you really wanted a story about Apple missing deadlines, it seems like, oh, I don't know, maybe the Mac Pro would be a better target for that? Since there is no word about that yet and at one point we were all expecting it to arrive at the end of 2018. Mac users would really be chomping at the bit if they hadn't been placated to some degree by the iMac Pro and updated Mac mini, but there are indeed some users that really need a Mac Pro, it would be great to have word from Apple about that... now it seems like maybe we'll not hear about it until June.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:That's some next level Apple Hater messaging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering that it's Apple and that they removed the head phone jack and quite a bit of battery to add a bit of wireless charging hardware that you can't even use because they've yet to release the wireless charging mat it works with - yes, it's kind of hilarious.

    2. Re:That's some next level Apple Hater messaging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apples phones can charge on any mat you dumb fuck.

    3. Re:That's some next level Apple Hater messaging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They most certainly can not. They use some proprietary Apple extension to Qi to charge and require special mats to charge on. I think Belkin sells like two that work with it, but they don't work with just any charging mat. If you blew $1000 on a new iPhone with less battery, go ahead and try it with any charging mats you can find. It won't work.

      Try with a $100 Android phone and it probably will.

    4. Re:That's some next level Apple Hater messaging by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Apple not being able to ship a charging mat is just plain comical. While your indignation is totally understandable, that doesn't make it not pathetic.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    5. Re: That's some next level Apple Hater messaging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is it comical?

    6. Re:That's some next level Apple Hater messaging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fortunately Apple has fanboi shills like you to defend them at even the slightest criticism. How sad.

  23. Power uprising Vapourware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    apple aqquired vapourwae company ppowerbyproxi in October 2017

  24. Re: A reality by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1
    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  25. Apple vs physics by Tough+Love · · Score: 2

    Apple vs physics: physics wins. Maybe consider letting engineers design products instead of powerpoint managers.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    1. Re:Apple vs physics by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      "letting engineers design products instead of powerpoint managers."

      Joke's on you: engineering is 50% powerpoint.

  26. They actually very much can by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    They most certainly can not. They use some proprietary Apple extension to Qi to charge and require special mats to charge on.

    Fake news. Find on Amazon a SINGLE Qi charger that says it is not iPhone compatible. You cannot, because they are... the typical text reads:

    The magic array wireless charger adapts to all Qi compatible devices, including iPhone 8/ iPhone 8 plus/ iPhone X/ XR/ Xs/ Xs

    Now Apple DOES have some custom additions to support a faster charging rate, But even there iPhones can still use something like 7.5W of the total charging ability of devices that support greater charging ability, instead of the base 5W. I think Samsung can support up to 10W with it's own custom QI extension... or maybe it's just supporting a faster Qi standard, I am murky on that point since I consider "wireless" charging technology kind of useless overall since it all actually has wires..

    The Apple charger I think would have been something like 10-15W so it would be faster. But again, its not like the other chargers do not work and ALL of them are somewhat slow compared to a wall charger, so they are about as useful.

    Frankly even if Apple had shipped the charging mat I would not have even bought it as other wireless chargers have configurations I prefer.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re: They actually very much can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, Nazi Ken Doll, have you ever actually tried using an iPhone with a wireless charging mat? Not looked up entries on Amazon, which is such a trusted store front and definitely never has posts with made up specs?

      Because I have. And guess what? The iPhone DOES NOT WORK with most wireless charging pads.

  27. How's life in the hypocrite lane?

  28. Re:Is based. Where the HQ is based. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's not nearly the same, though, right?

  29. Gone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Apple that made high quality hardware that really did 'just work' is dead and gone.

    I'm os agnostic and run all three on my laptops. The simple, clean, robust and well built macs I've relied on don't exist anymore.

    It's a shame.

    (one of things that I always loved about macs is that the mouse tracking was basically flawless. That's been gone for quite a few years now.)

  30. Electricity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one that DOESN'T want wireless power?

    Call it a decade or two of wiring 110v or having lightning strike close enough (twice) to feel some of it . . . I'm in no hurry for wireless power. Honestly, I think smart-leads (that can't be shorted) on the back of the phone and a gravity cradle that contacts enough to integrate was an idea we never should have went away from.

    Apple has to make sure it's not going to cross someone's ironclad patents (one it know it would lose against) as well as make it safe to charge. THEN they need to make sure non-certified stuff doesn't cause a fire (shuts it down, doesn't work). Any time almost any cell phone bursts, catches fire, or leaks, we find someone that couldn't even pay for a good knockoff adapter.

    One poster said they couldn't make it inoperable with everyone else's stuff --- this is one technology I'd like to see the big-guys develop themselves (own the problem) and see what implementation is right before we start making everything "compatible".

  31. Huh? by Shotgun · · Score: 1

    I don't get it. Apple is having trouble designing a Qi charger? I've been using a wireless charger for a couple years now. My current phone, a Kyocera, came with it built in, but I had to add a $5 coil into the back of my Samsung S6 for it to work. The Samsung charging pad cost about $15. I don't understand why Apple is having issues.

    --
    Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
    Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba