Slashdot Mirror


Paul Whelan, American Accused of Spying, is Said to Be Charged in Russia (nytimes.com)

Russian investigative agencies on Thursday indicted Whelan, a 48-year-old former U.S. Marine, on charges of spying, Interfax cited an informed source as saying. From a report: Mr. Whelan's lawyer, Vladimir A. Zherebenkov, who said he spent much of Wednesday with Mr. Whelan, said he had found his client in an upbeat mood despite the long legal road that he faces. "I was surprised to see him being so confident," said Mr. Zherebenkov, a high-profile criminal defense lawyer. Mr. Whelan, 48, the head of global security for the Michigan auto parts maker BorgWarner and a Marine Corps veteran, was arrested last Friday and is being held in solitary confinement in Moscow's notorious Lefortovo Prison. Russia's domestic security agency, the F.S.B., issued a brief statement on Monday saying that Mr. Whelan had been caught in "an act of espionage" but provided no other details.

Mr. Zherebenkov said that he had not seen all the evidence, but that he suspected that the American had been under surveillance for some time. "I presume that he is innocent, because for now I haven't seen any evidence against him that would prove otherwise," said Mr. Zherebenkov, who said that Mr. Whelan would petition the court for bail. Rosbalt, a Russian news agency close to the security services, quoted an unidentified intelligence source on Wednesday as saying that Mr. Whelan had been apprehended during a meeting with a Russian citizen in his room at the Metropol Hotel in Moscow. He is accused of trying to recruit this person to obtain classified information about staff members at various Russian agencies, the account said. Mr. Whelan was arrested five minutes after receiving a USB stick containing a list of all the employees at a classified security agency, the report said.

167 comments

  1. Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess this story was posted because the man was in possession of a USB drive?

    1. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess this story was posted because the man was in possession of a USB drive?

      No. A story was written about a man suspected of buying classified information. The USB drive is probably the most pointless piece of data here, but you certainly honed in on it while somehow being completely ignorant of the entire point of journalism.

    2. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me rephrase the question then....

      How is this news for nerds?

    3. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but this is "news for nerds" and not NPR.

    4. Re:Hmmm by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Yeah but this is "news for nerds" and not NPR.

      Does it actually say "News for Nerds" anywhere on the website anymore? Maybe I've missed it, but I don't recall seeing that for a long time- and wasn't the phrasing actually something like "News for Nerds and News that Matters?" - or am I thinking of another site?

      This probably isn't "News for Nerds" - but it could be argued that it is "News that Matters" (you could probably also argue that it doesn't matter... but that's a subjective decision). Playing devils advocate- you could say that a former world-power with nuclear capabilities arresting a spy of a current world super power, also with nuclear capabilities, is "news that matters". (you could also say it doesn't matter- I won't judge).

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    5. Re:Hmmm by alvinrod · · Score: 2

      If you browse to the main page and look up at your tab, it reads "Slashdot: News for nerds, stuff that matters" so it's still there. There's also a big difference between the phrasing you've used and what Slashdot is purporting to be. I've always read the phrase as that the news for nerds is the stuff that matters, at least to nerds. If you read it as "and News that Matters" as you seem to be doing, then one can make an argument for just about anything showing up here regardless of how much or little it has to do with technology or other nerdly matters. You've even done the necessary contortions to construe this story as something that matters, but now shouldn't Slashdot post any and all stories about politics between Russia and the United States, or does it only matter if someone is getting arrested as a spy?

    6. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny you should ask.

      Mr. Whelan's job title is "director of global security and investigations for BorgWarner, an international automotive parts manufacturer based in Michigan", so there is a technological angle right there which begs the question...

      Are you a 'spy' if your job is stopping Russian hackers from stealing or corrupting corporate assets?

      It would give many posters to /. a very good reason to never visit Russia

    7. Re:Hmmm by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      If you browse to the main page and look up at your tab, it reads "Slashdot: News for nerds, stuff that matters" so it's still there.

      Ahh yes- the title of the page, I see that now.

      There's also a big difference between the phrasing you've used and what Slashdot is purporting to be. I've always read the phrase as that the news for nerds is the stuff that matters, at least to nerds.

      Honestly, I've always thought it meant both "News For Nerds" and "Stuff that Matters" not, the explanation you gave above... but I really don't know, you could be right. I guess CmdrTaco is the only one who could explain what he meant by that phrase.

      As for "what matters" that would be subjective and every person would give a different account. What I do know is that I've been coming to Slashdot for over a decade (maybe closer to two decades now- I'm not sure when I started- this isn't my first account); in all that time there has always been stuff that wasn't just "News for Nerds"- so non Nerd stuff has always happened.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    8. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have a good point there, I didn't think of that.

      However, if he use illegal anti-espionage methods, then, yes, he might be consider spy. There is simply no evidence support either way.

    9. Re: Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i cannot imagine he is a spy. A pawn maybe at one point in time.

    10. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, real hard to just scroll past a story you're not interested in, isn't it?

    11. Re:Hmmm by LazarusQLong · · Score: 1

      yes, it does, look up at the tab you have Slashdot open in, the title in the tab is Slashdot: News for Nerds, stuff that matters.

      --
      "Governments have been dominated by the corporate entities and citizens have ceased to matter in public policy" true in
    12. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have a problem with me you can say it to my face.

    13. Re:Hmmm by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 0

      Looking at my attempted login entries in my logs for my home machine, I think it would give just about every human a reason to never visit Russia, eastern europe or China.

    14. Re:Hmmm by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      As for "what matters" that would be subjective and every person would give a different account.

      Exactly. There are some folk in here that seem to think this is supposed to be programming and not much else. Others have a different idea of what is allowable, and what sends their Blood pressure skyrocketing.

      As for me, I have varied interests, and an American being arrested on spying charges is pretty interesting.

      What I find weird is that so many of our smart Slashdot Brethren haven't figured out that if they aren't interested in a story, that they can just move on to something that suits their sensibility better.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    15. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A fairly high percentage of /. posters appear to be on the autism/aspergers spectrum

      It may be impossible for them NOT to be pedantic

    16. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Austerity is for Brexit retards, no wonder Russia is targeting you. They want to make you their next Trump pawn.

    17. Re: Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm on the autistic spectrum and I can skip articles that don't interest me

    18. Re:Hmmm by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      A fairly high percentage of /. posters appear to be on the autism/aspergers spectrum

      It may be impossible for them NOT to be pedantic

      I think you might have a point there.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    19. Re:Hmmm by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      Consider this popular story from 2001: https://slashdot.org/story/01/...

      The only nerdy part of it is the update that they're having server problems. So slashdot has been posting completely un-nerdy stories for at least 18 years now.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    20. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paul "The Faggot" Whelan is an idiot. Igor is going to have fun burying his thick Russian meat into that tight little pansy American ass.

      What a flabby little bitch.

    21. Re: Hmmm by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Most spies are in fact pawns of spymasters. Always have been.

  2. Impossible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Next thing you know, they'll be accusing us of interfering with their elections!

    1. Re: Impossible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have bail in Russia? I thought they just executed you if you didnâ(TM)t fit in the cell

    2. Re: Impossible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "if you didnâ(TM)t fit"

      what the fuck does that mean?

    3. Re: Impossible! by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      It means Slashdot has a Flintstones-era ASCII implementation.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    4. Re: Impossible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is SlashDot's iPhone user detector. It allows us to easily filter out these comments when necessary.

    5. Re:Impossible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Him, no. But US does fund various organizations to influence elections all over the world.

    6. Re:Impossible! by Luckyo · · Score: 2

      1990s called. They wanted to remind you that this is exactly what happened when Yeltsin got re-elected. It's not even contentious. Aid offered was direct and in no way hidden, because West had a massive interests in preventing the Communist party leader from taking the presidency.

  3. How do we know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How do we know he's not a real spy? The Russians would have poisoned him.

    1. Re:How do we know... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      How do we know he's not a real spy? The Russians would have poisoned him.

      You can't get a corpse to talk and give away information in exchange for freedom. He'll only be poisoned after he has sung.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    2. Re:How do we know... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No, he probably won't be. The Russians want someone to exchange for Maria Butina. He's a pawn -- the Russians are good at playing this game.

    3. Re: How do we know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do Russian trolls ever get mod points?

    4. Re:How do we know... by Nidi62 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How do we know he's not a real spy? The Russians would have poisoned him.

      No, they aren't crazy enough to kill foreign agents, that would open up a can of worms they don't want. They have no problem killing Russian expats though, and will do so publicly. Apparently if you are a former Russian agent or citizen who speaks out against Putin you have to stay away from doorknobs, tea, and people carrying umbrellas on bridges.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    5. Re:How do we know... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      They are crazy enough to arrest foreigners suspected of spying and exchange them for their own people. (e.g. Maria Butina). This was common during the Cold War.

    6. Re: How do we know... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Russians have very little modernity.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    7. Re:How do we know... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1, Funny

      "Cold" war, you insensitive clod? Goddam global warming denier.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    8. Re:How do we know... by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      They are crazy enough to arrest foreigners suspected of spying and exchange them for their own people. (e.g. Maria Butina). This was common during the Cold War.

      Oh, no doubt, especially since China is getting away with doing the same thing. But they won't kill him. That's how you get your own assets killed.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    9. Re:How do we know... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      That and you obviously need a warm body to exchange...

    10. Re:How do we know... by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      The Russians would have poisoned him.

      Unfortunately, it gets even creepier . . . poisoning would have been a pleasant way to go.

      Oleg Gordievsky:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      . . . wrote a bit about the history of the KBG . . . in a training film, the recruits were shown a film of a "traitor", being blindfolded and handcuffed, and lowered very slowly into a blast furnace.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    11. Re:How do we know... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 3, Informative

      They supposedly burned Penkovsky alive, but Penkovsky was one of their own operatives who turned and spied for the West. i.e. he was a traitor in addition to a spy. Garden-variety Western spies were more valuable alive, as pawns to exchange for Russian spies.

    12. Re:How do we know... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      "Cold" war, you insensitive clod? Goddam global warming denier.

      The world was colder during the cold war. Global warming hadn't reached current levels yet. WWIII is going to be blisteringly hot.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    13. Re:How do we know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell. Trade them, I say. Putin's not happy with her for pleading guilty and giving up information to investigators. Let that spying bitch go back to Russia and so Putin can have her killed. What's the problem here?

    14. Re: How do we know... by FormOfActionBanana · · Score: 1

      Try again tomorrow.

      --
      Take off every 'sig' !!
    15. Re:How do we know... by lactose99 · · Score: 1

      This is true, they still remember very well how to play the Cold War game while we've miserably forgotten.

      --
      Fully licensed blockchain psychiatrist
    16. Re:How do we know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're really not good at it, hence why we basically know everything they're doing.

    17. Re:How do we know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are laughing stock in Russia.

    18. Re:How do we know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't the US make people play a single person variant of prisoner's dilemma? Plead innocent lose your trial and get 20 years, plead guilty and get one year.
      There are plenty countries where this doesn't exist and you get a trial whether you confess or not.

    19. Re:How do we know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol and somehow they only ever get poisons in London, lol out of the entire world full of them, london, just london lol, ofc with the RADIOACTIVE POISONS lol

    20. Re:How do we know... by guacamole · · Score: 0

      to exchange for Maria Butina

      Butina has been charged only with not registering as a foreign agent and the recommended sentence is zero to six months. In other words, Butina is not a "spy" the hysterical media claimed her to be, and she will be deported one way or another from the USA this year. So Paul Whelan is kept for a difference reason.

    21. Re:How do we know... by guacamole · · Score: 1

      foreigners suspected of spying

      So what's wrong with arresting a foreigner that's suspected of spying? That's just crazy

    22. Re:How do we know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are also not the ones who started the arresting... they are reacting to being provoked. Could have just deported Butina and deny her re-entry perpetually, but no. Lock her up, no lawyers until have confession. Very free and democratic of them.

    23. Re: How do we know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia....

    24. Re: How do we know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So WW3 will be called the "Hot War"?

      *ducks*

      Quack

    25. Re: How do we know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? The sentence was 0 to 6 months. She will get a trial. If she hasn't had one.

      Sorry but only in Russia, a back ass shithole country, do people not see court.

    26. Re:How do we know... by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      Hell. Trade them, I say. Putin's not happy with her for pleading guilty and giving up information to investigators. Let that spying bitch go back to Russia and so Putin can have her killed. What's the problem here?

      The problem is she quite possibly has information that will be useful in court with the other targets (besides her and the other arrested and cooperating witnesses) of the Russian hacking investigation. The point of arresting her wasn't to take a spy off the streets, it was to be able to use the charges against her as leverage to get her cooperation in taking down some of the bigger fish in this ring. This is how conspiracy prosecutors work.

      That will be unavailable to US prosecutors if she's conveniently back in Russia, traded by the boss of "US Person 1" (from her indictment papers) for a US citizen Russia purposely picked up for this exact reason. There will be no leverage to get her to help prosecute her former US contacts, and its quite likely (as you imply) she will end up even more inconveniently dead, like many other Russians involved in this affair..

      Which means the next question is, if the POTUS agrees to "trade" a prisoner to a country who was otherwise perhaps going to cooperate with an investigation into his underlings, and possibly himself, is that interference in an investigation? The answer is "Yes", but its an innovative new way to do it.

      The next question after that is, does anyone have the authority to refuse? I'm not sure the answer to that one. I'm thinking probably not, unless she perhaps has state charges against her too.

    27. Re:How do we know... by T.E.D. · · Score: 2

      In the US, if you act as a foreign agent without registering as such with the US Justice Dept., you are considered a "covert foreign agent.". If you ever find yourself defending the nuance of difference between "covert foreign agent" and "spy", you really need to reexamine your priorities.

    28. Re: How do we know... by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      Yes, they do. If you want proof, go check any political post from late 2015, and set your threshold to +5. You'll see an inexplicable love for Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin. If you want to see the more typical /. skepticism of those people, you'll have to jack it down to -1.

      Russians had /. completely pwned the last 2 months of the election.

    29. Re: How do we know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure Mr Yank. It is always the other sides at fault.

      Can't be that the US abuses the justice system.

    30. Re: How do we know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Urban Moving Systems had a reason for the Novichok affair...

    31. Re:How do we know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the US, prosecutors often offer the possibility of pleading guilty in exchange for a sentence that is relatively mild compared to what may happen if convicted. Considering the extremely unpredictable outcome of US courts and the huge costs, this is often a more safer option than hoping for a fair trial, even for the innocent.

    32. Re:How do we know... by guacamole · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is a huge difference. "Foreign agent", covert or not, can be simply lobbying for, consulting for, or representing a foreign government or possibly just an individual. This occupation is not about gathering intelligence but more about being an ambassador for a foreign interest. If you want to define such foreign agent as a spy, then you need to examine your priorities because the DC and Acela Express corridor is filled with thousands of people who represent foreign interests and who don't necessarily register as such. This is against the law, but that's the reality. Butina was basically nothing more but a citizen diplomat. The hype about her arrest is simply part of the American hysteria about Russian interference and collusion.

    33. Re: How do we know... by c6gunner · · Score: 2

      You're making the rookie mistake of assuming that something which you personally cannot understand is actually inexplicable.

    34. Re:How do we know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do we know he's not a real spy? The Russians would have poisoned him.

      No, they aren't crazy enough to kill foreign agents, that would open up a can of worms they don't want. They have no problem killing Russian expats though, and will do so publicly.

      I don't think you, I, or the Russians have anywhere near the same definition of crazy, because that is pretty god damned crazy by most standards. Saudi Arabia and Russia offing expats shouldn’t ever be considered normal. If you do that, let’s just stop using normal and crazy in our reasoning right now, and leave things at, well, they haven’t yet (to our knowledge). ... aren’t crazy enough... as if everything else was not crazy.. Jesus Maria...

  4. Smells like a setup... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't you know that Russian boogeymen follow you from the airport to your bugged hotel room after you land in Russia?

    1. Re:Smells like a setup... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Russians caught him at the right moment, at the right time. How convenient.

    2. Re:Smells like a setup... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, if they were investigating him for a while they may have stumbled upon the timing of the meeting as part of that. It's not uncommon. Also possible the guy he was allegedly buying information from simply reported the offer to his superiors, who then setup a sting.

      Of course the most likely explanation, given this is Russia and we're holding one of theirs right now, is that this guy is a patsy to get a trade, as others have said.

    3. Re:Smells like a setup... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He flew all the way to Russia to exchange digital data on a USB stick. Right.
      I guess they haven't heard of a thing called the Internet.

    4. Re:Smells like a setup... by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      The Russians caught him at the right moment, at the right time. How convenient.

      If you are going grab someone and accuse them of being a spy you are going to want to arrest them servicing a drop point or during a meet, especially if you can catch them with confidential information. The question is, if there really was a USB drive and it contained confidential information, did he know about it or did he think he was just getting a compilation of his buddy's favorite cat videos?

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    5. Re:Smells like a setup... by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2

      No. In the free West, that is the concern. In a dictatorship, the Truth is what they say it is, and there are no free press to investigate to find contradictions.

      They needed a pawn and went and took one.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    6. Re:Smells like a setup... by nyet · · Score: 1

      You mean he should have flown to Russia to give them a public key in person.

    7. Re: Smells like a setup... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given that the US have several innocent Russians in jail, they simply do what is necessary.

      The airline pilot, Butina and more.

      America acts like Mafia thugs and thankfully the Russians counter this.

      I am from Portugal, before you ask.

    8. Re: Smells like a setup... by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      they simply do what is necessary

      The words of every tyrant in history.

    9. Re: Smells like a setup... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was unaware there was a Russian province called Portugal. Better brush up on my geography.

  5. Re:Something Something.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You left out Climate Change.

  6. Re:Something Something.... by ArchieBunker · · Score: 0

    Wish I had mod points.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  7. in soviet russia we spy on you! by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    in soviet russia we spy on you!

  8. Sounds like a good excuse for a meeting by mark_reh · · Score: 1

    at the highest levels of both governments so that Trump can get his new orders.

    1. Re: Sounds like a good excuse for a meeting by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      Copy & pasted from your fan fiction? Thanks for sharing, but its completely off-topic.

    2. Re: Sounds like a good excuse for a meeting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A hoe is still just a hoe.

      That hoe be gone soon, milky. Sheet, tRump could strangle that hoe in her sleep and you'd still be sucking husband off like the sorry little hoe you are. Skank.

    3. Re: Sounds like a good excuse for a meeting by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Teflon is not particularly hardy.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    4. Re: Sounds like a good excuse for a meeting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what happens when we have a First Lady who doesn't have a feminine penis.

    5. Re: Sounds like a good excuse for a meeting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      melania trump == sparrow

      here's a link https://www.cnbc.com/2018/03/03/red-sparrow-used-to-be-an-actual-phenomenon-during-the-cold-war.html

    6. Re: Sounds like a good excuse for a meeting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This reminds me of a recent meme " Michelle Obama, 2020. American needs another black male president".

  9. The NSA had their cyber tools ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    ... ripped off, so now it's landlines, fax machines and human spies.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  10. Re:Time for a spin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So a private citizen with a poor-conduct discharge conducting what amounts to industrial espionage on his own dime amounts to US warmongering? So what the fuck is it when Russian state-sponsored actors directly attack US infrastructure and political processes? Spin, indeed....

  11. Re:Something Something.... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    But ... actually ... now that I think about it ... where actually IS the outrage from the Oval Office Orange? Shouldn't he be fuming and twittering?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  12. They don't have elections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    About one fifth of the population walks into a voting booth, put in a vote, and Putin declares 75% turnout with 51% of the total population voting for Putin!

    How exactly could the US interfere in such a fake election?

    e.g. Putin's candidate Ramzan Kadyrov gets 98% of the vote..... it's not an election, its comically fake.

    1. Re:They don't have elections by LazarusQLong · · Score: 1

      I really enjoyed reading the story a few years back that all 2000 people in a little hamlet of about 100 voted for Putin's Puppet... whatever the hell his name was at the time.

      --
      "Governments have been dominated by the corporate entities and citizens have ceased to matter in public policy" true in
    2. Re:They don't have elections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speak to some Russians. You'll quickly realize that Putin is indeed a very popular president. The only one surprised is you "How dare they vote for someone they like?!!?!?", it's actually a normal thing in a democracy believe it or not, but you haven't lived in one for some time at least, so... your doubt is understandable.

    3. Re:They don't have elections by guacamole · · Score: 1

      Putin is very popular among Russians but the Kremlin has also done a lot deny the participation of viable young candidates such as Navalny in the big politics. Pretty much all of Russia's independent mass media is practicing self-censorship in order to avoid being crushed by the government censors. If Putin run against someone like Navalny (as opposed to the caricature "opposition parties" they have now) then Putin would still win, but with something like 55% of vote, add or subtract, but that will not satisfy Putin who always wants to win with a double percentage margin in order to perpetuate the perception that he has the mandate to do whatever he wants, including changing the constitution for example.

    4. Re:They don't have elections by rtb61 · · Score: 0

      I think you are confusing Russian news media with entirely censored US corporate news Media. You can not just claim censorship, you kind of have to show examples. Navalny just looks to be a scammy con artists and that is all the US has managed to come up with, if the lame arse was actually any good, he would be all over US media, non stop, all the fucking time but well he sucks and that is the best US could manage, does worse than the communist party and they do not do well.

      I also find mind boggling the idea that you consider it illegal to change a countries constitution, have you ever heard of the bill of rights, well you ignorant troll it doesn't exist, it is just a collective term for a series of shock horror changes to the US constitution, that is collectively referred to as the bill of rights, my god the humanity, the US constitution has changed repeatedly. So bloody lame, as is President for life, oh nooess Australia, the UK, New Zealand and Canada all have prime ministers for life, unlimited terms in office (yet somehow some of them barely manage to last a couple of years).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    5. Re: They don't have elections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Elections that result in outcomes I don't like are rigged and interfered with.

      Elections that have results I like were decided by the people, and how dare you question/undermine our democracy.

    6. Re:They don't have elections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Australia, the UK, New Zealand and Canada all have prime ministers for life

      No they don't.

    7. Re:They don't have elections by _merlin · · Score: 1

      Yes they can - the prime minister can stand for re-election as many times as he wants.

  13. Re:Something Something.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wish I had mod points.

    GP:

    Trump.....Something Something.....outrage.

    You think that's worthy of mod'ing up? Even though it's completely off-topic? Interesting.

  14. Kinda early to draw conclusions by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I assume the US has a number of people tasked with spying in Russia - there’s no reason the Russians couldn’t have made a strong effort to locate an actual US spy, regardless of their motivation (to trade for Maria Butina or whatever).

    Right now we don’t have enough information to determine if this guy is likely innocent or guilty.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Kinda early to draw conclusions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we don't have enough information

      But it's fun to speculate. I recall hearing on TV that this guy was dishonorably discharged from the Marines and it wasn't clear from the report what exactly he was doing in Russia in the first place - some kind of Russophile? Given the timing (after indictment of their NRA babe) and his personality it could be the Russians lured him into some scheme that they originally presented as legitimate but could subsequently be construed as spying. It's not like their NRA babe wasn't upfront and self promoting.

    2. Re:Kinda early to draw conclusions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's probably as much of a spy as Butina, as in not at all. Confessions are really easy to come up with when properly encouraged in lock down. Dirty tactics on both sides, haven't been used since cold war, but unfortunately it's US that starting bringing it back. Russia is just sending their reply with this guy.

    3. Re:Kinda early to draw conclusions by terrycarlino · · Score: 1

      The report I saw says he was in Russia to attend a wedding. In other words, not on business, but as a tourist. Why he would be meeting anyone is a mystery and does seem to support the patsy loured in to use as a bargaining chip.

  15. Re:Obvious deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interesting theory.

    Basically you are saying that US sanctions to Russia are unjustified and are only needed as a bargaining chip for when a US spy screws up? That makes a hell of a lot of sense.

  16. In the immortal words of Pres. Obama by Lucas123 · · Score: 1

    “Gov. Romney, I’m glad you recognize al-Qaeda is a threat, because a few months ago when you were asked what is the biggest geopolitical group facing America, you said Russia — not al-Qaeda. And the 1980’s are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back — because the Cold War has been over for 20 years."

    Oops.

  17. He has no reason to be confident. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If the Russians arrest you for espionage, there are 3 possibilities:
    1. You are a spy and they have evidence. You're screwed.
    2. You are innocent, but the Russians are putting a number on you for some political reason. You're screwed.
    3. You are innocent. The Russians made a mistake. What are the chances the Russians will admit to that and lose face? You're screwed.

    1. Re:He has no reason to be confident. by FormOfActionBanana · · Score: 2

      Yeah, actually I think really being the spy is the best situation. Because, you have the opportunity to get traded for another spy.

      --
      Take off every 'sig' !!
    2. Re: He has no reason to be confident. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      #2

      Apparently this guy is a big Trump supporter. And his yam President has yet to say 1 word about this. I hope the Russians kill this guy.

    3. Re: He has no reason to be confident. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope the Russians kill this guy.

      Just another example of a compassionate and tolerant liberal.

    4. Re:He has no reason to be confident. by times05 · · Score: 1

      "3. You are innocent. The Russians made a mistake. What are the chances the Russians will admit to that and lose face? You're screwed."

      Chances are very good. Just imagine of all the exploding heads "Russians aren't evil....they let him go... what!?!!?" POP

    5. Re: He has no reason to be confident. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a conservative and I voted for Hillary. Trump was a piece of shit, still is. Deal with it.

    6. Re:He has no reason to be confident. by guacamole · · Score: 1

      Let's be honest, if you're arrested for espionage in ANY country, you're screwed. I'd love to see what happens to a foreign professional or a student who gets wrongfully arrested in the USA. You go bankrupt because of the legal red tape, you get kicked out of the university and/or you lose your job. Your car, home, and personal belongings will be repossessed and never be seen again, etc. Other than that, I guess it's all cool.

    7. Re: He has no reason to be confident. by c6gunner · · Score: 0

      I'd love to see what happens to a foreign professional or a student who gets wrongfully arrested in the USA.

      You get a 1.6 million dollar payout from the US government.

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wik...

    8. Re: He has no reason to be confident. by guacamole · · Score: 1

      It helps to be a superstar professor. But a random H1B worker or a graduation student will be arrested, imprisoned, and thrown out of country with no apology whatsoever.

    9. Re: He has no reason to be confident. by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      [citation needed]

  18. what's good for business... by guygo · · Score: 2

    This is going to be great for American investment in Russia. What CFO or other company rep wouldn't want to be a pawn caught between Vlad the Impailer and The Orange Baboon? Oh and I'm sure China would l ike you to visit, specially if your company has invested heavily in Canadian companies. Yeah... book your dream vacation now.

    1. Re:what's good for business... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I wanted to read comments from the Washington post, or Huffpo, I'd read them there.

    2. Re: what's good for business... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't let the door hit ya where the good lord split ya. Repubtard.

    3. Re: what's good for business... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You communists should really get laid.

  19. Re:Obvious deal by mark_reh · · Score: 1

    Whooosh!

    What he's saying is that Trump will get help concealing his financial misdealings with Russian gangsters (Putin, et al.) in exchange for Putin getting Syria, Ukraine, and sanctions relief.

  20. Re:Fp Shit by mark_reh · · Score: 1

    Wow! That was some righteous gibberish! Don't stop now!

  21. CNN Interviews the Brother by DigressivePoser · · Score: 1

    CNN interviewed the brother. The "journalist" was most interested in a tweet Mr. Whelan made calling CNN fake news. God, what a circus journalism has become.

    1. Re:CNN Interviews the Brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's nothing personal, though. You know that, because CNN assured his brother that they were interrupting a news story about a civilian seized as a spy to ask about his criticism of CNN for non-personal reasons. We don't know what those non-personal reasons are, but they must have been Real News, because CNN is most certainly not a banana. I mean, Fake News.

    2. Re: CNN Interviews the Brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fox would have asked him about uranium for 12 hours.

  22. Re:Something Something.... by FormOfActionBanana · · Score: 1

    Trump..... as in President Donald Trump, in this particular instance does not evoke any .....outrage.

    --
    Take off every 'sig' !!
  23. Bargaining Chip by darth_borehd · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They trumped up the charges on him so he they could use him as a bargaining chip. The can now offer to release him in a big publicity show in exchange for Butina, another one of their people being held in the US, easing of sanctions, or something else to Russian interests elsewhere. It would look like the Trump administration liberated a marine veteran and Putin can get whatever he wants.

    1. Re:Bargaining Chip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "trumped up".. "bargaining chip"

      hmm.. can we swap the twit-in-chief for him?

    2. Re:Bargaining Chip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, this behavior was encouraged after Big Giant Orange Head indicated he was willing to do Realpolik-style trading for the Canadians that the Chinese seized. In apparent retaliation for that Huawei CFO that Canada arrested on a US warrant.

      The circumstances look bad, it must be said. "Mr. Whelan was arrested five minutes after receiving a USB stick containing a list of all the employees at a classified security agency..."

      On the other hand, how hard would be to plant such a USB stick to frame someone? And those 'terrifying secrets' exposed look to be actually rather tame, all things considered. You could read such a list into a court record (unlikely as that is) and still not suffer any significant national security damage. My point being, if this was a frame job, it would be a pretty competent frame job, with minimal exposure to the FSB and maximal damage to the US.

    3. Re:Bargaining Chip by guacamole · · Score: 1

      Uggh, Butina is a small fish, and her recommended sentence is zero to six months. The only thing she was charged with is not registering as a foreign agent (e.g. what every second lobbyist in DC does)

    4. Re:Bargaining Chip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed on Butina. The real issues there are:

      1). Big Giant Orange Head is curiously defensive about Russian collusion. Even if you put aside the endless red flags and suspicious behavior, BGOH sounds like a guilty man;
      2). BGOH had to close down Trump Foundation for corruption. We're talking direct, illegal transfers of money from the Foundation to the Trump campaign;
      3). The NRA practically ran into Butina's arms, which is odd for an organization that regularly wraps itself in the American flag;
      4). The FSB/KGB has a long, LONG history of using sexual entrapment to snare people and force cooperation. A tactic that Butina was (so strange!) accused of doing too;
      5). The NRA now stands accused of funneling Russian money to the Trump campaign, through the Trump Foundation. All of which would be wildly illegal.

      I believe I have that correct.

  24. Re:Something Something.... by Narcocide · · Score: 1

    He should be outraged in one direction or another. It's an excuse to Tweet, after all. The deafening silence from the WH suggests to me they haven't heard about this yet.

  25. Play stupid games; Win stupid prizes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's all I have to contribute

  26. Michelle Obama could kick your ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...so Obama attacks his rival in a debate, and THAT is proof Obama is/was a pal of Russia? Hey cunny, what is your point?

    FU traitor

    1. Re:Michelle Obama could kick your ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump is a traitor on Putin's cock, and you're a moron about to watch him die in prison. Enjoy.

    2. Re:Michelle Obama could kick your ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For arresting a spy? Andy Griffith could do that, or even Chief Wiggum.

      Now if Romney had not explicitly thought that Russian "Communism" was the threat, he might have had a better argument, but he never once managed to get up to an idea that mattered like the corrupt oligarchy in Russia that was oppressing the freedom of its citizens.

      He didn't. Three guesses why.

      And do note, Romney will not say anything negative about Russia now.

    3. Re:Michelle Obama could kick your ass by Lucas123 · · Score: 0

      And you're an anonymous coward, but I don't hold it against you.

    4. Re:Michelle Obama could kick your ass by Lucas123 · · Score: 1

      Again with "anonymous coward" comments. If you believe what you're saying, stand by it with your profile.

      Romney never made any reference to communism, only to Russia being a geopolitical threat, which it obviously was and is. Since then, you have the Russian annexation of Crimea during the Obama Administration, Russia's attempt to influence the 2016 presidential election and its involvement in the Syrian conflict in support of Bashar al-Assad's government.

      Are you going to argue Romney wasn't right?

      BTW, I voted for Obama and didn't vote for Trump, but I know it's hard for people wearing team jerseys to understand free, open-minded thought.

    5. Re:Michelle Obama could kick your ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Again with "anonymous coward" comments. If you believe what you're saying, stand by it with your profile.

      [excised for focus]

      BTW, I voted for Obama and didn't vote for Trump, but I know it's hard for people wearing team jerseys to understand free, open-minded thought.

      Free, open minded thought, except from the peanut gallery. I'm not even the guy you were arguing with, but come on. AC comments can stand on their own merits, or fall on the lack thereof. The only merit to your being named is the (frankly remote) possibility that people could follow your posting history backwards to see whether you actually posted support for Obama and/or opposition to Trump in the relevant times.

    6. Re: Michelle Obama could kick your ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being an aC has nothing to do with telling the truth. Stop using it as a scapegoat. You are wrong he is right.

      In 2008 was Russia a threat? No. The only reason they are a threat now is because of the person they elected...trump.

    7. Re: Michelle Obama could kick your ass by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Now if Romney had not explicitly thought that Russian "Communism" was the threat, he might have had a better argument, but he never once managed to get up to an idea that mattered like the corrupt oligarchy in Russia that was oppressing the freedom of its citizens.

      The only difference between Russian communism and the Russian oligarchy is that under the oligarchy people can actually get bread.

    8. Re: Michelle Obama could kick your ass by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      no no, he's right and the other guy was wrong. And everyone's kinda being a dick to the only guy who's actually giving some facts. Romney was correct, and forward thinking. I recall not long ago ( RESET button anyone?) how the left was falling over themselves to prove our issues with Russia were just historical and a little peace and love would resolve it all.

  27. Re:Obvious deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What evidence asshole? Post reputible sources or fuck off.

  28. Yep, mod parent up by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    Even the mainstream media has made this point. It's pretty obvious what's going on.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  29. troll farms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was he trying to dig up evidence on troll farms?

    Or is this all just completely manufactured by russia?

  30. Re:Obvious deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did that happen at the underground pizza child porn ring? With the lizard people? Before or after she was turned into a robot?

    Those are all claims you can find on the same pages that purport to have the evidence of which you speak, in case you're not following.

  31. Bah he is american by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They will scream and howl and 10 years later it will emerge he was guilty and up to something shady,

  32. Re:Obvious deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is not corruption in their eyes if the ends justify the means.

  33. Re:Something Something.... by AlwinBarni · · Score: 1

    They haven't mentioned about it on Fox & Friends yet?

  34. Here we go again.. by 0dugo0 · · Score: 1

    LOL .. Lone nut/usefull idiot/patsy in the making. Please start addressing him by his full gravestone name already.. John Wilkes Booth, Lee Harvey Oswald, John Flammang Schrank .. You know the drill.

  35. Re: Obvious deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL. So again. 0 evidence. Just a bunch of weak connections.

  36. Assassinate Vladimir Putin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kill the Satanic Monster who sucks the blood of Russian babies!

  37. Paul Whelan is a Trump supporter by Dmitri_Yuriescu · · Score: 1

    Paul Whelan is a Trump supporter. Let that sink in.

  38. lots of passports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    according to the bbc (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-46756996) this man has us, uk and probably irish citizenship. he even might have canadian.

    i am actually surprised - i have heard of 2 citizenships, but more than that ? wow.

    doesnt mean anything about this case, i am just really surprised one can have that many.

  39. happens all the time with Russia and China by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    When we catch their spies, both nation will grab a high profile yank and then accuse them of being a spy and offer up a trade. Gets old, but it is the game. One big difference with this, is both used to be kept quiet like happens with China today. Now, Russia is using the media and plays it up. China still keeps it quiet so as to not spoke executives from western companies. And I suspect that America keeps it quiet because probably about 1/10 to 1/3 of the time, they are holding a spy.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:happens all the time with Russia and China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So between 10% and 33% of the time it is an actual spy...

      You pulled those numbers out your ass anyway, so it's completely meaningless. It could just as easily be 99% - 100%

      Unless you want to lie further and claim America doesn't have spies?

  40. https://www.google.com/search?q=spoke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  41. No. by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

    He was eaten by a GRUe.

  42. Remember When? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember when Trump dismissed retired Navy Adm. William McRaven, and his critical comments of Trump, as a "Clinton Supporter?"

    https://thehill.com/homenews/sunday-talk-shows/417330-trump-dismisses-criticism-from-vice-admiral-who-led-osama-bin-laden-mission

    I suggest we do the same with Paul Whelan. He's a "Trump Supporter" and therefore not worthy of rescue or support by the nation.

    No, not really. But this is what stupid in the Commander In Chief leads to. And if it's good for the goose, it's good for the gander, right? Right?!