Slashdot Mirror
GM and DoorDash Announce Self-Driving Cars Delivering Food In San Francisco (venturebeat.com)
"General Motors is partnering with DoorDash to enable on-demand food deliveries via driverless cars," reports VentureBeat.
An anonymous reader quotes their report: The duo announced that a pilot delivery program will kick off in San Francisco in "early 2019," and will involve both meals from restaurants and groceries.... Back in 2016, GM splashed out more than $1 billion to buy Cruise Automation, a startup that developed an autopilot system for existing cars. In the intervening months, the company has been doubling down on its autonomous car efforts, last year announcing a driverless car with no steering wheel or pedals, with plans to launch the vehicle sometime in 2019. Elsewhere, GM also revealed that it is investing $100 million into facilities for building self-driving cars, while Honda recently put $2 billion into GM's Cruise for a 5.7 percent stake....
GM and DoorDash haven't revealed the full extent of the pilot or what the next stage will be, but it did say that "select merchants" that are already using DoorDash in the San Francisco area are on board. The underlying purpose, it said, is to "test and improve" the efficiency of autonomous deliveries in the area. "We see autonomous vehicles playing a major role in the future of delivery as consumer behaviors continue to shift online, and we are confident Cruise's leading technology will help us scale to meet growing consumer demand," noted DoorDash CEO Tony Xu.
An anonymous reader quotes their report: The duo announced that a pilot delivery program will kick off in San Francisco in "early 2019," and will involve both meals from restaurants and groceries.... Back in 2016, GM splashed out more than $1 billion to buy Cruise Automation, a startup that developed an autopilot system for existing cars. In the intervening months, the company has been doubling down on its autonomous car efforts, last year announcing a driverless car with no steering wheel or pedals, with plans to launch the vehicle sometime in 2019. Elsewhere, GM also revealed that it is investing $100 million into facilities for building self-driving cars, while Honda recently put $2 billion into GM's Cruise for a 5.7 percent stake....
GM and DoorDash haven't revealed the full extent of the pilot or what the next stage will be, but it did say that "select merchants" that are already using DoorDash in the San Francisco area are on board. The underlying purpose, it said, is to "test and improve" the efficiency of autonomous deliveries in the area. "We see autonomous vehicles playing a major role in the future of delivery as consumer behaviors continue to shift online, and we are confident Cruise's leading technology will help us scale to meet growing consumer demand," noted DoorDash CEO Tony Xu.
How long is the pilot? Nine months?
So I'll have to walk out to the curb to get my delivered food?
I thought technology was supposed to save me all that physical effort.
GM still in business? Oh lawdy what a joke. Guess I'm not using Door Dash, which company supports a green economy? I can get on board if it was Tesla or maybe Honda and Toyota. But GM, no thanks. They havent innovated in 80+ years.
Are you allowed to eat the mangled deer in the grill?
Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
Because they'll inevitably kill people.
That couldn't convince you to buy an EV. But you'll trust the food.
no steering wheel or pedals = Liability for who?.
and no an EULA can't move criminal Liability
Wait I thought automation was BAD for General Motors? Which is it, Slashdot?! Tell me what to think!
Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
The only thing that makes sense is for the liability to go to the automaker. It doesn't really matter if they have people sitting behind remote steering wheels with a camera image, or their AI solution; they are saying they want to be your driver and they do not believe you need any local control of the vehicle. Therefore the responsibility rests with them.
Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
Nobody outside of the SF metrofags wants that shit.
DoorDash is fail. GM better not hook their wagon to DoorTrash. Trump won't bail GM out this time.
Actually, what I wonder is - without a steering wheel, how do you manually get it off the road if it breaks down or is in an accident which disables the engine? I’ve been directly or indirectly involved in both situations (with “normal” cars, of course).
#DeleteChrome
Why are all these companies so obsessed with unemploying all their drivers? Self driving cars, drones, trucking, AI, etc. Governments are working hard to get people jobs and the corporations are trying harder to fire them all.
They're also forgetting that some people that use food delivery services now could have some disability that prevents them from leaving their home in the first place. How are they supposed to get to this vehicle to get their stuff?
What's really weird is the muffled sound of your voice with my cock in your mouth.
I couldn't make any sense out of what you were trying to say. Swallow before you try to speak.
Seems to make more sense to place the liability on whatever business or person is ordering the vehicle around. Naturally they'll pay an insurance company to to handle that for them. I suspect that some government agency will also seek to exert some manner of control over self-driving vehicles and might occasionally require particular models to be "grounded" much like that FAA does with airplanes if they have cause to believe there's a flaw that makes additional accidents likely.
Uh, no. If the car is advanced enough to drive itself, it can be expected to be fully capable of validating the directions that the user enters for safety and refuse to act on directions that are dangerous. If the person can't control the car, I don't see what commands they can give other than next stop point.
Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
"General Motors is partnering with AssDash to enable on-demand crapping via driverless toilets," reports VentureBeat. "It's the perfect complement to our Self-Driving Taco delivery service."
As with all gray liability cases, this will fall under the rule of "biggest pockets get sued" doctrine. So, yes, GM.
and no an EULA can't move criminal Liability
Hahahahahahaha. You must not be American. In the US, people who run companies are more likely to get hit by lightning than get arrested. Corporations are free to break just about any law. They may get a financial penalty, but that's about it.
124 dead people. Zero arrests. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
I don't respond to AC's.
So now, instead of actually having it delivered, you STILL have to go out onto the streets, risk discarded drug needles and the statistical 2 piles of human excrement per block.
JOY!
Chas - The one, the only.
THANK GOD!!!
I know this is a bit of a radical suggestion, but, how about a tow truck?
A self-driving car that dashes with my food to my apartment-door on the 7th floor?
Cute!