Slashdot Mirror


Vinyl and Cassette Sales Continued To Grow Last Year (fortune.com)

Albums sold on vinyl and cassette both saw a growth in sales according to BuzzAngle Music's End-Year Report profiling U.S. music industry consumption for 2018. From a report: Vinyl sales grew by just shy of 12% from 8.6 to 9.7 million sales, while cassette sales grew by almost 19% from 99,400 to 118,200 copies sold in the US, The Verge reported. Sixty-six percent of those vinyl sales were of albums that are more than three years old and feature classic bands like The Beatles, Fleetwood Mac, and Pink Floyd, reported BuzzAngle. Cassettes saw popularity in newer releases. CDs on the other hand have declined by 18.5% in popularity leading to a total decline in physical album sales of over 15%, reported The Verge. Meanwhile, audio streaming saw an increase of 41.8%, the largest of all music consumption.

15 of 272 comments (clear)

  1. Hiss and crackle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Some people get their hiss and crackle that way. I choose fire and snakes to accompany my digital music.

    1. Re:Hiss and crackle by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      its worse than bit rot. bit rot implies you had once a perfect copy; and in that case, you could have copied it to HD and others for backup.

      vinyl and analog cassette NEVER let you get a perfect copy. each and every time you play it, it gets worse and different (both). can't avoid it unless you optically scan the LP; and no way to avoid degrading tapes (they stretch, have drop-outs, no redundancy, bleed-thru, HF loss, etc).

      I have no idea what you are talking about. I grew up with that stuff, glad its gone, I do audio for a hobby and digital is the only way to go.

      analog is for hipsters OR for those who have exceptional analog systems, and that's really rare, today.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    2. Re:Hiss and crackle by fustakrakich · · Score: 3, Interesting

      no bit rot

      Yeah, the shit just wears out, which is much better...

      Vinyl and film I can understand, but magnetic medium just doesn't hold up. I don't understand why anybody would want a cassette tape. When are we going to bring back floppy disks? Or zip disks, there ya go... or better yet, punch cards and ladies in long skirts and high heels changing the reels of tape

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    3. Re:Hiss and crackle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's nothing to do with the medium, it's entirely to do with the mastering.

    4. Re:Hiss and crackle by serviscope_minor · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Cassette tapes? They are the worse medium for music devised by man.

      Well no that's unfair. They were better than what went before. They were compact, the tape was pretty well protected, recordable and you could fit 120 minutes into a single tape. This allowed you to actually carry quite a lot of music with you. 1 or two tapes would see you through two bus journeys and whichever lessons you could listen to music in without getting caught...

      At the time they were about the best choice.

      Though I only bought a few albums on tape, mostly I copied them from CDs or friends to my own tapes.

      Tape stretches and breaks for almost no reason.

      Yeah but it wasn't that bad. Even the rather failure prone D120s would last a fair while. The somewhat thicker tape that music was sold on generally lasted better than that. I basically listened to everything on D120.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    5. Re:Hiss and crackle by Zobeid · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yes. This. CDs can sound incredibly good if they're mastered right, but that's something record producers no longer have any interest in. Basically any rock or pop CD from about 2000 onward is going to sound crummy. Also, any recording from earlier than that if it has been remastered. When I see REMASTERED on a CD label, I mentally translate that as SPECIAL EBOLA EDITION.

  2. Did you know by BLToday · · Score: 3, Funny

    “Did you know that disco record sales were up 400% for the year ending 1976? If these trends continues... AAY!"

  3. Why? by AndyKron · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You can also buy "raw water" for $20 a gallon, but that doesn't mean it's better. Old records suck and cassettes are even worse. Tube amps suck too. I've lived with all of them. It's cool for a retro experience, but that's about it.

  4. People don't understand what digital music is by Solandri · · Score: 5, Informative

    The problem is that people think digital results in a different waveform than the original analog waveform. They can't understand how you can go from a stairstep digital signal to a smooth analog signal, and incorrectly conclude that something must be lost when you store music digitally. Yes something is lost, but it's only frequencies higher than Nyquist - half the sampling frequency, which is carefully chosen so the only frequencies lost are those beyond your hearing range (and weren't captured in the original analog recording anyway).

    Monty Montgomery demonstrated this in a video using an analog wave generator, an analog spectrum analyzer, an analog oscilliscope, and A/D and D/A converters. At 20 kHz, the stairstep digital waveform is an awful mess, but after conversion back to analog it's still a perfectly smooth sine wave.

    The mistake people make is thinking that the digital signal is a series of stairsteps. It's not stairsteps, it's just the corners of each stairstep. The sound's value is only defined at each corner. In between the corners, it's undefined. And it turns out that there is only one analog waveform which can be drawn through every one of those corners, yet contain no frequencies higher than Nyquist. So the digital sample of the waveform can perfectly recreate the original analog waveform (within the chose frequency limit).

    Vinyl is the music equivalent of homeopathy.

    1. Re:People don't understand what digital music is by imnotanumber · · Score: 5, Funny

      Vinyl is the music equivalent of homeopathy.

      Well. Not quite... homeopathy would be a track with only the cracks and other noises and then you would imagine that the music is playing.

    2. Re:People don't understand what digital music is by 4wdloop · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, you're up to something but you're barking the wrong tree. It is not magic, but for some a highly sophisticated technology is indistinguishable from magic.

      The 'digital' part of the audio systems has nothing to do with quality, and the Solandri's description is rather accurate, if not too technical for slash dot. In fact analog audio systems have rather limited frequency range and dynamic range, much more so than digital ones. Yes overdriven digital system will create nasty artifacts while analog ones would distort like heavy metal amps...

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      However, usually in customer digital systems the compression of audio is removing a lot of information from the original and sometimes also introduces audible artifacts.

      So it's not 'digital' that evil but 'mp3'.

      --
      4wdloop
  5. Re:Cassettes? Really? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 4, Funny

    Cassettes more portable? I guess you never experienced the glory of a turntable in your dash...

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  6. Kurt Godel, and Archilies by aberglas · · Score: 5, Informative

    But, as the Tortoise points out to Archilies, if the play back device is of sufficiently high fidelity then a cassette could be constructed that will produce resonances that will cause it to self destruct. And no matter how hard Archilies tries to fix his machine, the Tortoise can always produce a new machine destroying tape.

    Has something to do with Godel. And possibly Bach and Escher.

  7. Re: There is in truth much beauty by Tough+Love · · Score: 4, Insightful

    there are still ways to tell the difference, especially on tracks that have any waveform that are close to a fundamental harmonic of the sampling rate. You can actually hear the sampling beat frequencies injected into the music and distortion

    So you have not heard of Nyquist frequency or sinc filtering. If you can actually hear beat frequencies than your hardware (software?) is misdesigned. It can be mathematically proven that you can't hear such beat frequencies in a properly engineered system. Of course I realize I am telling this to someone who *believes* in vinyl, so it probably fell on deaf ears.

    Anyway, I can guarantee that you are wrong about the other guy being wrong. This is science.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  8. Re:For all it's faults..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A cassette tape will never install a rootkit on your tapedeck.
    Neither will a standard Red Book audio CD.

    They will never be able to take your cassette tapes away from you due to some rights-holder asshattery.
    Neither will they with a standard Red Book audio CD.

    A cassette tape doesn't care what region your playing it in.
    Neither does a standard Red Book audio CD.

    Cool old cars have tape decks.
    My cool old car has a CD changer.

    Creedence is supposed to have those hiss and pop sounds.
    If so, they put it on the master so it should show up on your standard Red Book audio CD.

    Tapes come with cool album art, lryics, and hidden messages.
    So does a standard Red Book audio CD.

    Tapes work offline.
    So does a standard Red Book audio CD.

    Tapes don't report your listening habits, location, duration, sexual preference and political affiliation so some corporation.
    Neither will a standard Red Book audio CD.

    Fuck it, this is too much work... romanticize all you want, just keep it to yourself!