Slashdot Mirror


15 Years After Announcing the 1GB SD Card, Lexar Unveils 1TB SD Card (theverge.com)

Lexar has just unveiled the first commercially available 1-terabyte SD card. "Lexar's Professional 633x line of SDHC and SDXC UHS-I cards [...] is now listed for sale in capacities from 16GB all the way up to the flagship 1TB," reports The Verge. "That card claims read speeds of up to 95MB/s and write speeds of 70MB/s, though it's only rated as V30/U3, which guarantees sustained write performance of 30MB/s." Unfortunately, you'll pay a premium price of $499.99 for the new 1TB SD card, which is more than the cost of two 512GB cards. Still, the convenience may be worth it.

Joey Lopez, Senior Marketing Manager of Lexar, said in a statement: "Almost fifteen years ago, Lexar announced a 1GB SD card. Today, we are excited to announce 1TB of storage capacity in the same convenient form factor. As consumers continue to demand greater storage for their cameras, the combination of high-speed performance with a 1TB option now offers a solution for content creators who shoot large volumes of high-resolution images and 4K video."

81 comments

  1. Too big... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Call me when it's available in the micro SD size.

    1. Re:Too big... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I'm sure they will

    2. Re:Too big... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SD cards are much nicer to use physically when putting them in and taking them out of portable devices.

      It's too easy to drop and loose a micro SD card. They are best put in a device and never touched again.

      I wish more devices kept with SD instead of micro SD plus you get the lock tab on SD.

    3. Re: Too big... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it's easy to lose a loose uSD card.
      There, a teachable moment for you.

    4. Re:Too big... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Call me when it's available in the micro SD size.

      That's what she said.

  2. 400GB for 88 dollars, who cares about the premium? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sandisk has out 400GB for 88 dollars now, although I imagine they are much lower sustained write speeds.

    But really, who cares about the price premium if you need these capacities in that formfactor?

    We're talking about the equivalent of a 1TB 2.5"/3.5" hard disk (that costs ~50 dollars) in the formfactor of a THUMBNAIL, for only 10x the cost. That by itself is insanely impressive.

    Given the scale out discussed for the next few years, we can only expect capacities to continue increasing as well. If they can get up to the 80mb/s SPI throughput speeds, I will be quite happy. That is enough throughput for all but datacenter dataset level workloads, or some particularly unoptimized games asset streaming.

  3. Abysmal speeds for the density by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not even triple digits.

  4. I got some on Ebay. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First 1 Tb card? Nuh uh, I bought some on Ebay for like $15.

    Since it seems like you have to state this on /. these days, I'm kidding. Kids, don't buy counterfeit SD cards on Ebay.

    1. Re: I got some on Ebay. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know, rimht?

    2. Re: I got some on Ebay. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You bought 1TB but got that 1GB that they announced 15years ago ;)

    3. Re:I got some on Ebay. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tb means teraBIT.

  5. congrats to lexar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Whine all you want about the utility / cost of this. It's still cool as hell.

  6. Moore's law confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Fifteen years, that is about 10 18 month doubling periods.

    Ten doublings gets you about a 1000X increase, so Moore would have predicted an increase in density of 1000, and that what you can buy !

    1. Re:Moore's law confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interestingly enough the storage capacity on an SD card probably is tied very closely to number of transistors in a chip.
      Unlike things like CPU clock frequency or number of SATA ports on motherboards it would seem like Moore's observation would be applicable in this case.

    2. Re:Moore's law confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, it's scary how perfectly accurate that worked out to be. 15 years and the announcement fit the Moore timeline to within a day, being only a few hours ahead of schedule. Moore himself didn't expect the 18-month periods to last beyond 1975, anticipating that by 1980 it would have dropped to a 24-month period. And yet, here we are.

    3. Re:Moore's law confirmed by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      It's not nearly as closely tied as it used to be. Modern flash uses multi-level cells, so each cell stores 2 or more bits, but is also very unreliable so a lot of cells are used for error correcting codes. The amount of redundancy that you need for error correction dominates the useable capacity of modern flash. Cheap flash storage typically uses the same chips as more expensive flash storage but doesn't reserve as much space for error correction. The probability of an error is the same, the probability of a non-correctible error is a lot higher.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    4. Re:Moore's law confirmed by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Moore's law is not dead, it just never had anything to do with performance. Fortunately for Flash doubling of transistors literally means doubling the size of the card.

  7. How long will you have to watch vacation pics... by ffkom · · Score: 2

    ... at your friend's home after they returned with a full SD card?

    I mean, the technology is great, but it should come with some mandatory training on how to delete all the crappy shots that no one wants to watch anyway ;-)

  8. More Amazing than Any Other PC Aspect by eepok · · Score: 2

    I'm still gobsmacked at how digital storage has changed. I got my first computer in the mid-1990s. It was someone's hand-me-down 286. It was already old, but I learned everything I could about DOS on it. When I built my first computer PC the summer before college, and I was stunned by the 3.5" form factor.

    Then came 2.5" form factor, the various types of slash memory, etc. But SecureDigital... wow. One terabyte on an SD card?

    Processor speed, ya, cool. But storage... wow!

    1. Re:More Amazing than Any Other PC Aspect by Greyfox · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I started out with cassette tapes on a TI 99/4A around 1983. A few years later, the Apple 2's (An assortment of //s, ][s and IIs as I recall) in my high school's computer lab had 5.25" disks. Somewhere along the way I also used reel-to-reel magtapes and 8" floppies. In my first real job, the 286 they'd just purchased for some client work had whopping 80MB drive in it, about the size of two large bricks and weighing about as much.

      If I'd told my first boss that three decades later, we could store a terabyte on something the size of my pinky nail, he'd have laughed at me and accused me of making up the word "Terabyte."

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    2. Re:More Amazing than Any Other PC Aspect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is more amazing than storage capability is our ability to use it. A computer/phone that does not much more than they did 15 years ago consumes massive amounts more storage. Presumably just because it can.

    3. Re:More Amazing than Any Other PC Aspect by arth1 · · Score: 2

      You must have a very large pinky (these are SD cards, not micro-SD), mr Hulk.

      Anyhow, to put it in perspective, in my first job, we used punch cards. Up to 80 7-bit characters per card. A big box of 2000 cards could hold a little over 136 kB.

      My first personal computer, I bought a 20 MB Winchester hard drive for, and didn't know what to do with all that space. I ran a BBS on it, but there was plenty of unused space.

    4. Re:More Amazing than Any Other PC Aspect by Kjella · · Score: 1

      If I'd told my first boss that three decades later, we could store a terabyte on something the size of my pinky nail, he'd have laughed at me and accused me of making up the word "Terabyte."

      I was with my dad at IBM in the 80s and they had like all the brochures so I remember reading about their biggest enterprise storage solution that could go up to 6 TB if you had a kazillion dollars and a football field for the racks. This was a time with 5 1/4" floppies and like 10 MB HDDs, so a gigabyte was comprehensible but a terabyte... it was like infinity plus one. Today I got a single HDD bigger than that, it's actually rather insane. Though I'd probably be more freaked about the Internet, I mean back then we had nothing but sneakernet with floppies and today I have fiber. Or rather at home I had my C64 with cassette tapes, I only got a floppy drive much later.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    5. Re:More Amazing than Any Other PC Aspect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was excited to move from tapes to floppies, over the moon when I got my first hard-drive, and positively ecstatic to drop $300 on a 3GB drive at one point.

      But.... now I'm just kinda jaded. Over it. Tired of the churn. Technically it's very impressive, but for day to day... meh, whatever, don't really care anymore.

    6. Re:More Amazing than Any Other PC Aspect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moderated overrated for abusing the code tag.
      Enjoy, douchebag.

    7. Re:More Amazing than Any Other PC Aspect by xlsior · · Score: 1

      Then came 2.5" form factor, the various types of slash memory, etc. But SecureDigital... wow. One terabyte on an SD card?

      More impressive to me are the 400GB and 500GB microSD cards out there.

    8. Re:More Amazing than Any Other PC Aspect by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 2

      I stared out with an Atari 800 and then bought a cheap clone PC-XT. Then a PC-AT 286. Then a 386.

      I remember paying ~$200 for a single fucking megabyte of RAM in (8 16-pin DIP chips) and at the time you couldn't do a single goddamn thing with that much RAM except make a big-ass ramdisk. And that was fucking useless too.

      I think I paid about $400 for my first 20 megabyte hard drive. Megabyte, not gigabyte. At the time, the idea of owning a actual gigabyte of hard drive space was about the same as owning your own Space Shuttle. It was a ludicrous notion at best.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    9. Re:More Amazing than Any Other PC Aspect by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I bought a 20 MB Winchester hard drive for, and didn't know what to do with all that space.

      For the youngsters here, that was before you could download basically unlimited amounts of porn, free, off the internet.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    10. Re:More Amazing than Any Other PC Aspect by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      Typically you had pirated games and occasionally other software like Norton Utilities.

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    11. Re:More Amazing than Any Other PC Aspect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A few years ago, I bought some SanDisk 64GB thumbs, and they were literally the size of a finger nail. (They're intended for use as a cheap removable faux ssd). I believe they have 500 GB units of the same size now. Yeah. Tiny.

  9. A terabyte of storage the size of a postage stamp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These are truly wondrous times. Anyone remember when Micropolis went out of business because they thought a gigabyte of storage on a single spindle was so ridiculously out of control?

  10. Beats Moore's law nicely by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

    By a full two to three years

  11. Re:400GB for 88 dollars, who cares about the premi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But in a much worst reliability than an SSD,

  12. Re:How long will you have to watch vacation pics.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    How long will you have to watch vacation pics... [sic] ... at your friend's home after they returned with a full SD card? I mean, the technology is great, but it should come with some mandatory training on how to delete all the crappy shots that no one wants to watch anyway ;-)

    Pictures? 1 TB is enough to store over a week of 1080p video. You can watch the entire vacation!

  13. Re: 400GB for 88 dollars, who cares about the prem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So many different options and this manufacturer and that manufacturer hyping this and that and the other thing. And if it is this price then one thing and this price then another. I agree when you say it is all ridiculous, after all every day we just sit and save the same old files to whatever folders we always saved them to. And there is always some utility ready to help you optimize this that or the other thing. At the end of the day all you really need is a coke and a smile, WiFi, an an emergency thumb drive to carry around. They think all those ads will get us to behave differently when we walk into the store.

  14. Re:How long will you have to watch vacation pics.. by Kjella · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well, a high-res file (40-50 MP) is typically around 50MB compressed RAW. So ~20000 photos. If you say maybe 3 seconds between each in a slide show that's ~60000 seconds so ~17 hours. Though honestly if you're doing photos you can just offload those any time you take a little break. I expect this will be used for extremely long continuous video shoots, like if you're doing 400 Mbps all-I like some cameras offer now you'll get ~6 hours. But let's be honest, you're either going to flee or strangle them in the end so just bail immediately.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  15. Too bad it's Lexar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their SD cards are absolute garbage, half of them are DOA, the rest have about a 1 week life-span before corrupted/destroyed.

    1. Re:Too bad it's Lexar by geekd · · Score: 1

      Lexar card are crap, I agree. The only SD Cards I've ever had fail on me is Lexar.

    2. Re:Too bad it's Lexar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lexar card are crap, I agree. The only SD Cards I've ever had fail on me is Lexar.

      drawing statistical conclusions from a single data point, you get an F in statistics and a stupid thing to explain away on your next job interview

  16. Re:How long will you have to watch vacation pics.. by Shinobi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just like the 256GiB and 512GiB cards changed usage patterns for those of us who snap a lot of photos, so will this card. Like you say, you can take long high-quality recordings, and still fit a lot of still images.

    For example, a few years back, I filled up multiple 128GiB cards with photos and recordings of the 6 Hours of Spa weekend(and let me tell you, trying to take good photos of cars going 250km/h or more is not easy, hence a lot of 15-20 image sequences etc). Just needing 1 card for the weekend will be nice.

  17. Petyabyte in 15 years by manu0601 · · Score: 2

    Why takes the bet about petabyte in 2033?

    1. Re:Petyabyte in 15 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Call me when we can do a single library-of-congress on one of these.

  18. Re:How long will you have to watch vacation pics.. by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    At 8K? Thats not going to be a very long clip :)

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  19. Re:400GB for 88 dollars, who cares about the premi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "much worst"???

    Like your English?

  20. I want this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd like to have, for my car, my whole CD collection on a card or two - not as dumbed down mp3s or other formats, even lossless, but as full CDs.

    Or for music at my job. Or house.

    I don't know anybody who wants their car to connect to the Internet.

    Screw streaming. Local only.

    Now, couldya increase that to a petabyte, please? :-)

    1. Re:I want this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lossless is a waste for car player, you will never hear any difference between flac and 320 kbps mp3. It is fairly difficult using good equipment.

  21. Floppy by Ann+Coulter · · Score: 1

    Thirty years ago, we had 1.44MB floppies. This fifteen year to 1024-fold increase correspondence holds up.

  22. Available for years on E-bay and Amazon by goombah99 · · Score: 5, Funny

    What's the fuss. They have been selling 1TB cards on ebay and amazon for years now,.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Available for years on E-bay and Amazon by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      What's the fuss. They have been selling 1TB cards on ebay and amazon for years now,.

      Some of them were probably real, too.

      Lol, seriously though, bogus SD cards on Amazon and eBay are endemic; I only buy from a brand name manufacturer (e.g. Sandisk, Samsung, Kingston, etc) and I do a full R/W test on the card as soon as I get it.

      If you buy a 256GB SD card for $4.99 on Amazon or eBay, you won't get a 256GB card. You'll get something that identifies itself as 256GB card but is really a 8 or 16GB card that's had the firmware fiddled with.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    2. Re:Available for years on E-bay and Amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  23. wrong, you have it backwards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the time required to backup a drive is getting longer and longer

    so really the drives are getting worse and worse

  24. Not compatible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sustained write performance of 30MB/s

    and

    a solution for content creators who shoot large volumes of high-resolution images and 4K video.

    Seems mutually exclusive, somehow.

  25. is it crash proof? by swell · · Score: 1

    The more you put on your storage device, the more you have to lose when it crashes.

    So, add to the $500 cost of this device another $1,000 for your minimal backup system. Back up to a 2nd unit, then back that up to another. Keep them up-to-date. Keep one in a safe remote location. Reasonably safe if they are SanDisk brand. What? Oops!

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
    1. Re:is it crash proof? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be a great way to think about it if it was a regular disk.

      This is a SD-card and is going to be used as a temporary storage while moving around, for example in a video camera.
      The video will then be uploaded to a stationary computer overnight.

      Take you example and apply it on a story where it actually applies.

    2. Re:is it crash proof? by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      These things are basically transfer media. I use USB thumb drives to transfer things between my laptop and desktop and only clear the laptop once it’s successfully been copied.

      Oddly enough, I’ve had several more expensive USB sticks (Kangaroo was the most recent) over the years but a couple of cheap Lexar 32G sticks have lasted for years of fairly regular use.

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
  26. laptops by markdavis · · Score: 1

    >"As consumers continue to demand greater storage for their cameras, the combination of high-speed performance with a 1TB option now offers a solution for content creators who shoot large volumes of high-resolution images and 4K video."

    The better use case is for laptops, tablets, phones and such devices, not cameras. Photographs- a cheap 128GB SD card stores many, many hundreds of super-high quality photos, which you then unload onto a computer and wipe. Far more capacity than anyone would ever want to trust or need on a single card (which is also easy to change). Even the most elaborate weddings I can make due with two 128GB cards. Video- perhaps, but 256GB is a LOT of 1080P footage. Again, how much to trust on one card? But on a laptop, it makes a wonderful media card to have lots of replaceable (not critical) music, photos, movies, etc, and also for backup. You can only mount and keep a single card active and "home" in the device, so having a lot of space is very useful.

    1. Re:laptops by Shinobi · · Score: 1

      Oh, these cards will be used in cameras too.

      Like I said in another post, a couple of years ago, I filled up multiple 128GiB cards with images and videos of the 6 Hours of Spa race weekend(recordings, still image sequences of the cars in motion to try and get that perfect shot, HDR shots of the cars when standing still etc). And, since you're limited in just how much you can bring in at many races, you can't exactly setup external HD's etc etc.

    2. Re:laptops by markdavis · · Score: 1

      I just don't see where it is any big deal with cameras to have 2 or 3 cards vs. a much more expensive single card. At least, not in my experience. Plus it is good to have the redundancy, in case of card failure. Some cameras even have dual slots and will write to both in mirror mode.

    3. Re:laptops by Shinobi · · Score: 1

      No risk of missing track action(better to have tried to take the shot, and have a data failure, than to have stood there like an idiot, flipping cards, while the action happened), no fiddling with cards while in a crowd, no fiddling with cards while your fingers are frozen stiff etc.

      But yeah, since your reference case was a wedding, your use case is different. Around a track, we can't exactly ask the drivers to hold up for a minute, just because we need to swap a card :p

    4. Re:laptops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Modern cameras are doing 4k60 and 6k30 video at 4:2:2 10-bit color as well as photos, shit a cellphone just can't do.

    5. Re:laptops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With high resolutions you may need 2 cards to have the write speed to do rapid fire photography used for nature and sports photography. The camera can alternate between cards while taking a burst to capture a bird in flight and not have the wings be a blur. You can also do continuous video, swapping out the filled cards for blanks as needed, you can set it to save photos to one card and video to the other, you can set it to automatically duplicate everything to both cards, useful in situations where the cards cold be lost or stolen like filming corrupt cops/corporate criminals/corrupt politicians, pop both cards out and hand them to different people, the cops go after the guy with the camera only to find photos of cats while the real photos/video makes it's way to the internet.

  27. I see a new online fad coming by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In Europe, "slow TV" is a thing. You see a travel show that consists of a ride on a canal boat or a back-country bus that unfolds in full, as though you were there, with nothing left out. Some programs of this type have run for days, like the 132-hour voyage of a Hurtigruten ferry along the entire coast of Norway. People generally do not sit and watch the whole thing, but use shows like this as life background.

    With SD cards of this capacity, it becomes possible for anyone to record extended life events in real time. On social media, watch for selfies to be replaced by "My Entire Week at Disney World" and "My Job at the Amazon Warehouse."

    1. Re:I see a new online fad coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or "My Complete Sex Life!" available on a 128 Megabyte Smart Media Card.

    2. Re:I see a new online fad coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean on social networks. The life events recorded are the media.

    3. Re:I see a new online fad coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Europe, "slow TV" is a thing. You see a travel show that consists of a ride on a canal boat or a back-country bus that unfolds in full, as though you were there, with nothing left out. Some programs of this type have run for days, like the 132-hour voyage of a Hurtigruten ferry along the entire coast of Norway. People generally do not sit and watch the whole thing, but use shows like this as life background.

      They've got this here in America now, although instead of strapping a camera to a steam train, they just play CCTV from the latest school shooting on a continuous loop. My European friends may sniff at it, but I find it very soothing.

    4. Re:I see a new online fad coming by Toshito · · Score: 1

      I think the bottleneck will now be the overheating camera.

      Sony cameras have a 5 minute limit on 4K video, and it can even be less than that if you're filming in high ambiant temperature (high being more than 21ÂC).

      --
      Try it! Library of Babel
    5. Re:I see a new online fad coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the bottleneck will now be the overheating camera.

      Sony cameras have a 5 minute limit on 4K video, and it can even be less than that if you're filming in high ambiant temperature (high being more than 21ÂC).

      The Panasonic GH5 4k60 record limit is the limit of your power source or storage capacity.

    6. Re:I see a new online fad coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Europe, "slow TV" is a thing. You see a travel show that consists of a ride on a canal boat or a back-country bus that unfolds in full, as though you were there, with nothing left out. Some programs of this type have run for days, like the 132-hour voyage of a Hurtigruten ferry along the entire coast of Norway. People generally do not sit and watch the whole thing, but use shows like this as life background.

      With SD cards of this capacity, it becomes possible for anyone to record extended life events in real time. On social media, watch for selfies to be replaced by "My Entire Week at Disney World" and "My Job at the Amazon Warehouse."

      Hush. :)

    7. Re:I see a new online fad coming by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      It's in 8K video now?

  28. SDXC UHS-I? by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

    The UHS-I is just a speed class. And here I was thinking that after regular SD, SDHC and SDXC they just had to make yet another backwards-incompatible revision.

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  29. Re: 400GB for 88 dollars, who cares about the prem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    M.2 SSD are not much larger than a (full) SD card. Prices are similar to the SD cards. Reliability is incredibly much better on SSDs. I don't see why people don't put M.2 slots on phones, cameras, etc.

  30. Re: 400GB for 88 dollars, who cares about the prem by petermgreen · · Score: 1

    Pretty much all M.2 SSDs from major brands are M.2 2280 , so slightly narrower than a SD card but over twice as long.

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  31. Re:How long will you have to watch vacation pics.. by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

    But if you're only watching a photo for 3 seconds, you might as well use high def JPG instead of RAW, and fit 10 times as many pictures on there.

  32. Re:How long will you have to watch vacation pics.. by mjwx · · Score: 1

    ... at your friend's home after they returned with a full SD card?

    I mean, the technology is great, but it should come with some mandatory training on how to delete all the crappy shots that no one wants to watch anyway ;-)

    SD cards have uses outside of home photography.

    I've run fleets of vehicles with dashcams before. a 128GB card can hold about 20 hours of 1080p footage, given that these vehicles are in use 10-12 hours a day, we rely on drivers manually pressing a button to preserve footage of any incidents. It would be better if we could just keep up to a weeks worth of footage. Headless servers are another popular use, have ESXi, Linux binaries or whatever OS installed on a small SD card and keep your data/programs/VM's on the SAN, making the server essentially interchangeable.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  33. Re:How long will you have to watch vacation pics.. by s122604 · · Score: 1

    6 Hours of Spa weekend

    .... hot...

  34. Re:How long will you have to watch vacation pics.. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    ... at your friend's home after they returned with a full SD card?

    Not long. With cheaparse GoPros shooting 4K at 60FPS that 1TB barely gets you through a single battery charge.

  35. Re:How long will you have to watch vacation pics.. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    What's 1080p video? The camera I bought for $300 5 years ago does 4K.

  36. Re:How long will you have to watch vacation pics.. by Shinobi · · Score: 1

    The weekend is not just about the 6 hour race, but the support races, qualifying, open pitlane, meeting drivers and other fans etc

  37. Perfect for "ambient" TVs by Artemis3 · · Score: 1

    Couple those with "ambient" TVs (designed to look like paintings or part of the wall) and you can now have animated backgrounds in your home.

    I don't think Disney or Amazon would sit happy, and will find ways to monetize that (or sue you into oblivion); but people recording treks to natural parks or outdoors could be a good source of 4k+ "slow" entertainment.

    --
    Artix
    Your Linux, your init.
    1. Re:Perfect for "ambient" TVs by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      I hardly think Disney would object to the free publicity, any more than kids taking selfies there now. Amazon might object on basis of workplace privacy, after which there will be a lively debate over who has the right to object to collecting personal data. .