Procter and Gamble Unveils New Device That Aims To Remove Signs of Aging (bbc.com)
In a video for the BBC, technology correspondent Rory Cellan-Jones uses Procter and Gamble's new device to maker him look younger. Called Opte, the device scans the skin and precisely applies tiny amounts of make-up to remove age spots, burst blood vessels and other blemishes. Opte has a camera in it that captures 200 frames per second and processes that data by looking at the difference of the color of your skin. It then sends it to a microprocessor and 120 thermal inkjet printers print the product directly on your skin. The company says it works with all skin colors via three different cartridges: light, medium, and dark. Procter and Gamble is planning to release the device in late 2019 or 2020.
" the device scans the skin and precisely applies tiny amounts of make-up " = You fuck right off with that.
" The company says it works with all skin colors via three different cartridges: light, medium, and dark. " What color is your skin? Medium. Oh right.
Does it coat your face with makeup until you suffocate?
I have something a lot cheaper that will make you look years younger. It's a nappy and a rattle.
This space for rent
First tech gets invaded by people from the social sciences telling us how bad we are (based on dubious statistical methods), and that it's our fault women don't want to study math.
Now we have stories on Slashdot about how to look younger. Next week are we going to have a story about how to increase our popularity?
This is really cool tech, micro-makeup application. I can see a use for it, but I never want to use it.
I don't mind looking old, I mind being old. The appearance isn't the problem.
"First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
Learn to handle market trends - inkjet printed and laser trimmed brows, eye lashes and nose hairs.
If you can't make a robot cross uncanny valley - cross it yourself.
They should put it on Donald Trump's ass.
After 150 years of indifferences, we finally found something to unite us.
Will it shave my ears, too?
When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
But I'd be interested in what men's reaction was the first time they saw their wife or girlfriend without makeup. Today's style is pretty much flat monocolor. many women even hid their freckles (a mortal sin).
She does have one friend who's husband has never seen her without. She puts it on in the morning, sleeps in it, then washes her face and goes through it again.
Just curious - women hiding behind excessive makeup to me is the equivalent of a male wearing a braunschweiger in his pants.
The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
If the inkjet like product that is applied to the skin is found to cause cancer (and ultimately does), the product was aimed at older people! If the determination takes longer than 20 years, they may not get sued. Even if it takes less, it will be tied up in litigation for years, and the plaintiffs will all be gone. Either way, there is plenty of profit to be made off of vanity.
P.S. We already know that it has been found by the state of California to cause cancer, because California has found nearly everything on the planet causes cancer!
I think this is the most useless product I have ever heard of
We guys aren’t the target demographic.
#DeleteChrome
This product lets people use much less makeup while achieving a more natural look. It also helps people who don't know how to apply makeup well. I'm all for this if we see less of the painted-on face look.
Additionally, cosmetics are regularly scrutinized for containing potentially dangerous chemicals, and this product reduces the amount needed significantly.
It's because you have never heard of the FUFME.
You must not be a 70 year old woman... Trust me they'll be lining up to blow billions of their husbands hard earned money.
A robot will never let a human die in uncanny valley
Does it work on orange skin? Asking for a big wet friend.
You are welcome on my lawn.
Does it wash off, or will it make their heads get progressively bigger over time?
I am sure bottles of water in CA have that warning too. I am surprised they dont have billboards and blimps flying around that breathing might cause cancer.
And speaking of cosmetically enhanced corpses, our political class will flock to this.
I think this is the most useless product I have ever heard of
O rly?
http://theworstthingsforsale.com/
How much are refill cartridges, and can I buy third-party refill kits?
Back then we called them "beer goggles". As in, "that chick is bufugly" went to "hmm, I'll go for it" in the span of a few hours. I suspect women did the same in reverse, but as I have a dick and failed big time at the game I'm, um, shit I just said I've been a loser all my life. We'll just stop posting here. Seriously, STFU. Do not drink that drink.
For once I'm (kinda?) glad my blood pressure meds don't let me ", um, get a hard on? No, die sooner? Fukifino. Oh, question. Die or get laid pretty much depends on who might get naked with me. And if I'd want to get naked with any woman who would get naked with me.
It would be a very prudent warning
else that comes from the United States in America, they are in the business of selling lies to desperate people. And the war they fight is to get their lies into the headlines. The new device, for example, does not "aim to remove signs of aging". It aims to cover those signs, so that rich old people can get their hands on younger bodies with less effort.
It is no coincidence BBC sent a guy with pigmentation spot problems to advertise for P&G. It is no coincidence that a site of ageing "nerds" is running the news.
Of course, for money.
Because billboards and blimps cause cancer.
"AI airbrush ad?"
The ad's motto: "We put the 'AI' in 'airbrush'."...?
Ezekiel 23:20
To hide the truth
No idea what acronym you'r refering to.
I think this is the most useless product I have ever heard of
I agree. It does nothing for those of us that didn't look so good even when we were young.
Does nobody remember Homer's makeup gun?
Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
I think this is the most useless product I have ever heard of
Oh, come on. You know there is at least one guy in the US who is probably already on the phone with them asking if he can get it with an orange skin tone cartridge.
Covering up with makeup is not equal to removing.
The printer itself costs only $50 but the inkjet cartridges cost $1,500 each, & contain all 3 shades; light, medium, & dark. If one shade runs out the machine refuses to print anymore until you've replace the whole cartridge. Cartridges are digitally signed & can't be refilled & used again. Would actually be cheaper to hire a professional make-up artist, plus they'd make you look a lot better.
BTW, since IT & therefore /. is predominantly male, does it have a drag-queen mode?
Debate is a form of harassment. Do not question my truth.
Am I the only one that feels embarassed for anyone who would actually use such a thing, male or female?
..and you all thought people Photoshopping themselves was bad enough.
Have we become so vain and narcissistic that there's actually a market for a device like this?
https://dilbert.com/strip/1997-11-13
Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
Trust me they'll be lining up
a. To blow their
b. Recently deceased
c. Husband's
d. money
e. Profit!
I'm quite certain there's a motive or puzzle in there, somewhere
Procter and Gamble Unveils New Device That.... applies makeup.
"Procter and Gamble Unveils New Device That Aims To Hide Signs of Ageing"
There, fixed that for yer.
Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes.
Why stop at the signs? Why not simply stop the aging all together?
She said the ink only prints to blemishes and contains "anti-aging chemicals" so "they should start to fade over time with use of the device." If they have fucking "anti-aging chemicals" why bother with the printer? Are they just calling cell-killing chemicals "anti-aging" and taking advantage of the fact the ink only prints over blemishes while healthy cells can fill in when they die?
And you will come to meet it sooner than you believe! REPENT! REPENT! REPENT! Set yourself free. Go ahead. Vote Republican again! You're already going to hell no matter what, now!
Cant it give you back the metabolism and energy you had when you were in your 20's or 30's?
Because otherwise, it's just another makeup scam... making people think that just by very superficially *looking* younger, you could somehow supposedly feel any younger than you actually are, or enjoy the kind of life you had when you were younger.
Because that is what would be important in the fight against aging... not purely exterior shit like age spots or what have you.
File under 'M' for 'Manic ranting'
Not just looking prettier.
Jumbo bag filling machine
http://www.baggingmachines.net/product-item-21.html
jumbo bag packing machine
http://www.baggingmachines.net/product-item-21.html
bulk bag filling machine
http://www.baggingmachines.net/product-item-134.html
bulk bag packing machine
http://www.baggingmachines.net/product-item-134.html
flour packing machine
http://www.baggingmachines.net/product-item-81.html
flour bagging machine
http://www.baggingmachines.net/product-item-81.html
charcoal packing machine
http://www.baggingmachines.net/product-item-80.html
coal packing machine
http://www.baggingmachines.net/product-item-80.html
coal dust packing machine
http://www.baggingmachines.net/product-item-157.html
feed packing machine feed packaging machine
http://www.baggingmachines.net/product-item-232.html
animal feed packing machine
http://www.baggingmachines.net/product-item-138.html
If it is merely a bit of robot-applied slap then forget it.
politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
Whatever the merits of the makeup device it has to be said that the catalogue of dodgy products you linked to was the most amusing thing I have seen for ages. Thanks!
Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
I also expect when these things appear on the market, that the cost of the device and/or the filler will be eye watering. And that when self applied by a person, or in natural light looks less convincing than it might on video.
So this new product will incorporate tools from the photographic version like Spot Healing Brush and global color shifting (use the White Balance eyedropper to get rid of that sallow complexion!) But will the Ex-Wife Removal Tool, or Content-Aware Fill as Photoshop calls it, be included?
Of course, for the likes of you: no amount of technology can negate fuglyness.
I look young enough to actually cause me problems in life. I'm 50 years old but have looked like a teenager most of my life. Only recently I've started inching up in to the 20's as far as looks. You wouldn't think that's a problem but it is. When people don't treat you your age then it causes quite a lot of annoying issues.
Now if I was female it would be a different story altogether. Young females can get anything they want. Young males however get pushed down to the lower ranks.
My wife wears a relative minimum of makeup, mostly a little eyeshadow and mascara. Point is, it was never a surprise to see what she looks like in the morning.
Similar here except that my wife wears no makeup at all most of the time. She has little time and no real interest in painting her face for vanity and she's allergic and/or sensitive to a lot of that stuff anyway. I think she's beautiful with or without makeup so she doesn't have to wear it on my account. If I don't find her attractive in her natural state, no amount of makeup is really going to fix that.
But I'd be interested in what men's reaction was the first time they saw their wife or girlfriend without makeup.
If someone is surprised what their lady looks like without makeup then they are involved with a very vain and/or very insecure person. Maybe things are different where you live but most of the women I interact with regularly wear little to no makeup as a routine matter and I've seen all of them without frequently. Why would you want to be involved with someone that concerned with hiding their actual appearance the majority of the time? I like a pretty face as much as the next person but if you aren't reasonably attractive to begin with, no amount of face paint is going to fool anyone. If someone can actually tell that someone is wearing makeup then it is either badly applied and/or excessive - usually both in my experience. It's like guys wearing a hair piece to hide balding and then thinking nobody can tell.
In my case it was actually more of surprise to me the first I saw my wife IN makeup.
She does have one friend who's husband has never seen her without. She puts it on in the morning, sleeps in it, then washes her face and goes through it again.
Wow. That person seems severely insecure and very likely her husband is contributing to the problem either intentionally or unintentionally. Nothing wrong with wearing makeup just like there is nothing wrong with dressing up nicely. Appearances do matter and taking the time to show that you care about your appearance is reasonable. There comes a point however when it tips from concern over appearance into insecurity and/or vanity. This person seems to have left that line pretty far behind them.
We need to accept we get old... not try to cover it up and try to look like those photoshops ads we see everywhere.
Reminds me of those goggles that applied the eye makeup to LeLu's face.
Actually a pretty cool application of the technology. Not for me, but targeted pinpoint coverup is something that I can see a lot of folks wanting. My wife covers up an age spot every morning because it bothers her. I could care less, its her thing. This would do the job easily and with less stuff applied to the face. I see it as a good thing.
Cool story bro. Why do you think that women are so weak that some evil patriarchy forces them to wear makeup?
Women aren't forced to wear makeup but the certainly are influence and coerced into it by a variety of means. Many of the influences actually have little to do with men directly. Women's magazines are a common example. Women influence other women as much or more than men do on the issue. There is nothing wrong with wearing SOME makeup just like there is nothing wrong with dressing nicely.
Women through the ages have enjoyed decorating themselves.
You think that is somehow independent of the influence of men or society? Sure many (not all) do enjoy it and there is nothing wrong with that but let's not pretend that social pressure doesn't play any role here. Men decorate themselves too, just in different ways. There have been times and places where men were expected to wear makeup thanks to social pressures. You think all those teenage boys wearing Axe body spray are doing that for any reason other than self decoration?
Makeup, which is not good or bad within itself, is another form of decorating.
Of course it is. Just like clothes or jewelry. It's in essence part of a costume which people wear in their daily lives. And there is nothing wrong with doing that - to a point. But just like most things it can be taken too far or done for the wrong reasons. Nothing wrong with taking some care to look good. Appearances do matter whether we like it or not. But there comes a point where it goes beyond reasonable care for one's appearance and into vanity and/or insecurity. If nobody has seen you in public without makeup and it's not your actual paying job (like a model) then that is a problem.
So the idea that makeup is something forced on women by the evil patriarchy is both silly and very demeaning to women, casting them as so weak that they can't even make up their minds.
Strawman. I don't think very many people think that at all. Few would argue that appearance doesn't matter or that makeup is bad as a general proposition. It's a more complicated issue than that. Mostly it isn't really a problem but like anything it sometimes becomes one. Women unquestionably are subjected to unreasonable expectations regarding their appearance and excessive use of makeup is often a symptom of this broader underlying problem. No/some makeup is fine. Lots of makeup and/or excessively routine use should raise some eyebrows.
I know many men, and the ones I have talked about women's makeup do not like it at all - they consider it dishonest, and some like myself, simply love freckles - covering them up is unforgivable.
If they think SOME makeup is dishonest then ask them if they are willing to go on their next date dressed in dirty wrinkled clothes and smelly because that is basically the same argument. Social conventions matter and makeup is one of them. It's just about intent and degree. Few reasonable men mind a sensible amount of makeup and enhancing one's appearance is far from dishonest. Like most things it isn't a problem until it is taken to excess or done for the wrong reasons.
For the record I agree on freckles. I find them adorable too.
... if a human looks like a robot, which is the purpose of this appliance.
your husband's glasses black.
That scanned your face and applied makeup. Isn't that some kind of prior art?
It does not remove age spots, it hids them with makeup. And why is this advertisement on /.?
Well this is probably only needed when you go to interview for a new job and don't want to be discriminated against due to age signals.
As a hip and trendy middle-aged metrosexual male, I have to ask whether this will cope with my beard? And can gingers expect their freckles to be airbrushed out? Only joking, the concept sounds awesome but I have trouble brushing my teeth in the morning, let alone spending valuable time to look like a gameshow host!
Removal requires belt sander.
If you can't make a robot cross uncanny valley - cross it yourself.
We'll meet them in the middle!
Come on, people. This is funny.
Really? 128 comments and no one has brought up the prior art from The 5th Element? And here I thought /. was full of nerds.... SMH
I think this is the most useless product I have ever heard of
This is a product that could potentially impact or even disrupt a $532B international cosmetics market with an estimated five year CAGR of 7.14% a year by creating a product that could dramatically reduce the amount of makeup needed and dramatically improve the effectiveness of its application. Clearly useless. :P
Can I flip this into reverse and sell 'age up' wipes to teens wanting to buy alcohol?
I was so sad when this page disappeared off the internet...
http://www.easylife.org/fufme/
You could try vanishing cream: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Initial statement is allegedly made wrong.
Asking for a friend.
"This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."