Slashdot Mirror


Software-Defined Satellite Will Be Launched Soon (bbc.com)

kbahey writes: Traditionally, large satellites are configured on the ground for specific tasks that cannot be changed after launch, even if market demands evolve. The new "Quantum" satellite scheduled to be launched soon, will change all that: its coverage, bandwidth, power and frequency can all be altered in orbit. The 3.5-ton spacecraft will be operated by Paris-based telecom operator Eutelsat, in a R&D partnership with the European Space Agency (ESA), with manufacturer Airbus acting as the prime contractor. A company official stated that the satellite "will bring unprecedented flexibility to our customers, allowing for in-orbit payload re-configuration and taking customization to a new level, while also opening the way to a paradigm shift in the manufacture of telecommunications satellites." The BBC says "being able to totally reconfigure an in-orbit platform would allow an operator to adapt to any shifts in the business landscape -- without the need to build and launch another bespoke platform." All the operator would have to do is simply reprogram the existing satellite.

35 comments

  1. Sounds like a software define radio.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With stearable horn(s) to bounce off the flat reflector or the flat reflector is a phased array to steer the beams.

    1. Re:Sounds like a software define radio.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To transmit to the flat earth!

    2. Re: Sounds like a software define radio.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The horns are fixed and reflector flat and fixed. The beam shaping is done by passing the same signal through all the horns with slight gain and phase adjustments. The signals then interfere with each other to produce the desired shape in the far field.

  2. LEO and SDR. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wonderful seeing SDR being used. Hopefully the internet LEO constellation being put up later will incorporate these ideas. That's the one thing that needs the flexibility.

    1. Re:LEO and SDR. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      It is not uncommon to have something like an SDR in a satellite. Some are dumb frequency translating relays, but the ones with in-orbit functionality typically have updateable radio hardware.

    2. Re:LEO and SDR. by grep+-v+'.*'+* · · Score: 2

      It is not uncommon to have something like an SDR in a satellite.

      This is about the ONLY place where I'd want to omit moving the the Berg jumpers for an update. Every other (terrestrial) computer should have them if they need to be reprogrammed at the BIOS / evil UEFI level. Unfortunately, not so.

      Hey, if we add the jumpers to a satellite, wouldn't we then need a space force to go there and update them via a 8" floppy? That, or maybe we could turn Elon Musk's flying car on remotely and have it drive itself back home. Dragsters have parachutes of them, why not a Tesla?

      --
      If the universe is someone's simulation -- does that mean the stars are just stuck pixels?
    3. Re:LEO and SDR. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are Law Enforcement Officers putting up their own satellites for?

  3. General purpose communications satellite by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes, the satellite can be reprogrammed within certain limits, but it cannot be changed into a weather data collection or a mapping satellite just by doing some reprogramming. That will need to wait for a satellite with general purpose 3D printing and robot manufacturing built in, as well as uploadable software. I suspect that is not on the immediate horizon.

    1. Re:General purpose communications satellite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      " That will need to wait for a satellite with general purpose 3D printing and robot manufacturing built in, "

      LOL

      "I suspect that is not on the immediate horizon."

      Or any horizon, really.

    2. Re:General purpose communications satellite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Satellite as a Service? Allow the software to be wiped after each user is done.

  4. we had rollable TVs in the '60s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the difference was; rolling TVs from before did not watch us?

  5. Yay! by Harold+Halloway · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hackable satellites!

    1. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, so not only will some dope hack it but also make it rain....
      I can only guess why we haven't had a film where terrorists earth dozens of satellites
      and creaye havoc with the incoming bolides...

  6. its good by Harrybells · · Score: 2

    Traditional satellite networks depend on the closed and planned architecture. Thus, there are many challenges such as configuration update, new communication and networking technologies introduction, truly-differentiated services provision, satellite network device interoperability, and the integration of satellite and terrestrial networks. Software-defined networking (SDN) has the features of flexibility, programmability, and logical centralization, which increases network resource utilization, simplifies network management, reduces operating cost, and promotes the evolution and innovation. In this paper, a new software-defined architecture for next-generation satellite networks, called SoftSpace, is presented.

  7. Well, as long as it's a paradigm shift and all ... by recrudescence · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sounds like someone is thinking outside the box, leveraging some core competencies and hitting the ground running. An amazing display of synergy and proactivity if you ask me. I bet it runs on a blockchain on the cloud.

  8. sounds like a bad idea by sad_ · · Score: 2

    is this modelled after 'modern' software development?
    you know, like in games and certain other software, where after the first install (on release day) you get to install immense patches fixing stuff.
    so after launch and deployment in space, the first thing it will have to do is get a software update, and another one and another and...

    and let's not talk about the risk that the update mechanism will get hacked and then anything is possible.

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
    1. Re: sounds like a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well you have to admit there is risk but also reward here.
      Are there satellites in orbit now whose newly discovered vulnerabilities cannot be patched?

    2. Re: sounds like a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are quite a few protection mechanisms in place to prevent hacking, one of the most obvious one being command encryption.

    3. Re:sounds like a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is this modelled after 'modern' software development?

      Develop on production platforms and let end users all be beta testers? This'll be fun!

  9. Quantum satellite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The AI satellite is made obsolete by it.
    The Cyber satellite made obsolete by that.

  10. Hackable satellites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good, now the Russians and the Chinese can hack our satellites.

  11. Color me impressed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SDR on a satellite. Who would have thought this would happen already today instead of in the far future, like 2019 or so ?

    1. Re: Color me impressed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not SDR in the way you probably understand it: the received RF signal is not digitised and then processed. Rather, the RF signal is manipulated by analogue circuits which can be configured by software commands.

    2. Re: Color me impressed. by unrealmp3 · · Score: 1

      Even cooler.

  12. Re:Well, as long as it's a paradigm shift and all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Our Satellites hit the ground running. Yes, that makes a wonderful horror movie...

  13. Re:Well, as long as it's a paradigm shift and all by BarneyGuarder · · Score: 1

    Sounds like someone is thinking outside the box, leveraging some core competencies and hitting the ground running. An amazing display of synergy and proactivity if you ask me. I bet it runs on a blockchain on the cloud.

    It runs blockchain Above the cloud!

  14. Just a matter of time ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... before someone uploads the deathstar firmware.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  15. I've heard this before... by acoustix · · Score: 1

    ...not specifically with satellites, but other equipment. It rarely actually happens where there will reconfigure the existing equipment. Many of these non-military satellites are shared with many tenants. The chances of them being able to move all services off to another satellite reconfigure it are slim to none.

    It would be cool to see it actually happen. But history isn't on their side.

    --
    "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
  16. Re:Well, as long as it's a paradigm shift and all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like they have all kicked their ducks on to the same hymn sheet too

  17. Phfffttt! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get back to me when it uses graphene in a turnkey solution, divesting innovative financial strategies to achieve an open door policy.

    Foosball in the foyer!

  18. In space.... by tchdab1 · · Score: 1

    ... no one can see your blue screen.

  19. seems obvious by billiebiebie · · Score: 1

    i thought all satellites already do this...guess i'm wrong

    1. Re: seems obvious by Glloq · · Score: 1

      The satellite industry is terribly conservative. We only fly proven technology, after lengthy development and qualification programmes. New Space is changing that, but it doesn't work everywhere.