Slashdot Mirror


Old People Can Produce As Many New Brain Cells As Teenagers (independent.co.uk)

Long-time Slashdot reader Futurepower(R) shares this article about a newly-published study which counters previous theories that neurons stop developing after adolescence: Healthy men and women continue to produce new neurons throughout life, suggesting older people remain more cognitively and emotionally intact than previously believed, researchers found. For decades it was thought that adult brains were hard-wired and unable to form new cells. But a Columbia University study found older people continued to produce neurons in the hippocampus -- a part of the brain important for memory, emotion and cognition -- at a similar rate to young people....

However, the researchers also noted fewer blood vessels and connections between cells in the older brains, which Ms Boldrini said "may be linked to compromised cognitive-emotional resilience" in the elderly.

The article suggests these newest findings may be hotly debated.

"They come just a month after a University of California study suggested adults do not develop new neurons."

91 comments

  1. We can by PPH · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just don't want to.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:We can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is more profound than a lot of people realize. Most of the people I know stopped doing entirely new things (like a new field of study, not just keeping up with an old one) after they turn 25 or so.
      Get out of the habit of doing to, and after 30 years or so, it becomes impossible to start.

    2. Re:We can by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Given a choice between a negative finding and a positive one, I'm going to lean towards the positive one.

      It is more reasonable to find what did find than it is to find what you didn't find, after all.

      A lot of people really want the old theory to hold water, but it doesn't. If they wanted to find a new theory, this field would be moving forwards faster.

      This study shows it is their own fault they don't learn anything new, it can't just be blamed on age. We only have to wait for the old generation to die for new ideas to take hold because the old people choose to be narrow-minded, not just because they're old.

  2. Trump is still headed for prison or the gallows!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll
  3. Re: But, I thought "science is settled" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is and we do!

  4. Not at all a surprise by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 3, Funny

    Of course we can produce new brain cells. We just forget where we placed them... Now get off my lawn!

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    1. Re:Not at all a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're apparently not even old enough to see a need to stop lying yet. Now get into ADX FLORENCE, TRAITOR!

    2. Re:Not at all a surprise by doom · · Score: 1

      Anyone old enough to think the "get off of my lawn" joke is still funny is clearly pretty old.

    3. Re:Not at all a surprise by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      This is why I drink bourbon - alcohol is a preservative.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    4. Re:Not at all a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt that traitor faggot actually does, he just posts it anyway. Just like nobody believes his attempts at obfuscation and misdirection, the idiot just posts 'em all anyway lol. Paid by the word no doubt.

    5. Re:Not at all a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I drink bourbon for more HONEST reasons. :-) https://selfhacked.com/blog/myelin/ -- But I found this interesting and comprehensive-enough-for-casual-reading (TM) while drinking it.

    6. Re: Not at all a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Itâ(TM)s for that old fart who canâ(TM)t think of anything else to say, if anything. Isnt it pasture bed time?

    7. Re:Not at all a surprise by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      OK, gramps, but that's because you forgot where you put your glasses and can't see how young he still is.

  5. Re:But, I thought "science is settled" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    We already know everything about the brain. That's why we have AI.

  6. Donald Trump is a genius prisoner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    His signature is a joke, have you seen it lol? It looks like a failing lie detector test readout. He's going to be stamping license plates if he's lucky, but I don't think they even let them do that at ADX Florence.

    https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/12/politics/trump-putin-meetings-no-records/index.html

  7. Re:But, I thought "science is settled" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But, I thought "science is settled" and 97% of scientists agree?

    It is. Old people are stupid and vote Republican.

    WTF?! The Parent is a Troll and deserves worse!

  8. Re:Trump is still headed for prison or the gallows by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 0

    Wait - because the President has not publicly disclosed everything he said to a world leader, he's a traitor? So no President can ever have private and confidential conversations with other world leaders?

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  9. Re:But, I thought "science is settled" by Desler · · Score: 1

    No one has said anything of the sort. Weak trolling is weak.

  10. Re:But, I thought "science is settled" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eggzzzzzzzactly

  11. Trump is still headed for prison or the gallows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not "any" world leader, Vladimir Putin, the guy he colluded with, the guy his campaign had hundreds of contacts with the agents of, despite saying he had zero to Congress and the American people. The walking traitor, Drumpf.

    Nice try bitch, but Trump's headed for ADX Florence. You dishonest little faggots do it to yourselves.

    1. Re:Trump is still headed for prison or the gallows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait - Lyinwig, are you pretending to be stupid in defense of a traitor? Shouldn't you also hang then?

    2. Re:Trump is still headed for prison or the gallows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please quote something other than Memos about "I heard people who said this and this" and the other accusations that was already cleared after investigation, or the Dossier than was paid by Democrats. Or flimsy accusation stemming from having a Trump Tower in Moscow as well, unless you want to accuse him of colluding with 25 countries (with just having business ties).

      Meanwhile, if you have time also quote some concrete evidence about Trump being racist - NOT the millions of excerpts and opinion pieces about him being a racist.

      Though truth to be told, there are people so deep into confirmation bias ,there are millions of people who cannot see context when it hits them like a brick on their forehead. People who insisted when they listened to him talk that they hear Trump saying "They (Mexican) are rapists" when it's clear in the "They are not sending the best video that he's talking about how illegal immigration is sending their criminal elements into America, "(...)their rapists." So yeah, after 4 years of emotional investment into this whole collusion thing I don't expect you to suddenly stop and turn like I'm not expecting any Otaku to stop his relationship with his Waifu in his Dating SIM with a simple talk, no matter what I say.

    3. Re:Trump is still headed for prison or the gallows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay. How does Trump's love of Putin affect me, the average American? It feels like my day-to-day live hasn't changed, even though some people act like the world is ending. What horrible things have happened and/or are going to happen that I'm not seeing?

    4. Re:Trump is still headed for prison or the gallows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " Dossier than was paid by Democrats. " Actually? It was paid for by the GOP then bought and continued by the D, then shown to the FBI because it was so damning. And the FBI verified many aspects of it.

      And Trump lied about his contacts with Russians, and his campaign manager is going to prison for the rest of his natural bitch ass life. Trump's stunt with shutting down the government isn't helping him.

      In DC, a lot of people are affected. Guess where the grand jury pool is drawn from? #STRONG ROPE TOWN, DC

    5. Re:Trump is still headed for prison or the gallows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " What horrible things have happened and/or are going to happen that I'm not seeing? " - It depends, are you going to pull your head out of your ass and look around, honestly? No. There's no educating you.

      Frankly, nobody has any evidence you're even from the US, you don't speak English particularly well, and pretending to be stupid enough to "not see" anything bad going on as a result of this administration... is implausible.

      Still, I'll grant you could just be one of the toothless uneducable Republican faggots that thinks the longest Government shutdown in US history is "nothing"... because your head, it's in your ass. You can't see it.

      From your perspective, shit tastes great and Trump is your flavor. I get it. Hey, when we hang him? You can go too. Bitchass traitor.

    6. Re:Trump is still headed for prison or the gallows by Archtech · · Score: 1

      Frankly, nobody has any evidence you're even from the US, you don't speak English particularly well

      Why would anyone need such evidence? Has Slashdot suddenly become restricted to US citizens?

      And I'm confused. Surely not speaking English particularly well would be evidence that a person is a US citizen.

      --
      I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
    7. Re:Trump is still headed for prison or the gallows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just a Russian traitorbot pretending to live in the US you idiot. Yes, you're confused.

  12. 'old people'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, millennial. You do know you won't be 25 forever, right?

  13. My brain is so big now . . . by reboot246 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It won't even fit inside my skull! I call the external part of my brain "the internet". Seriously, we all use the internet as an extension of our brains. There's no need memorizing so much stuff when you have nearly the whole knowledge and wisdom of the world at your fingertips.

    I prefer to use my "internal storage" for personal memories. That's nearly 66 years of friends, family, parties, relationships, neighbors, holidays, and the like. I still do math problems in my head just to keep the CPU in shape. Emotionally I'm about the same as I was long ago; just a little bit slower to anger, but that's all.

    1. Re: My brain is so big now . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah well you must be a robot. Someday you may meet other robots and possibly find fulfillment in your tiny robot soul

    2. Re:My brain is so big now . . . by antdude · · Score: 1

      I have no brain. :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  14. Language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why can a child learn a new language easily while older brains can't?

    1. Re:Language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > Why can a child learn a new language easily while older brains can't?

      Stephen Pinker hypothesizes in The Language Instinct that certain brain structures develop in childhood which are dedicated to learning language and understanding how to use it, and after the child internalizes his/her native language, these structures are repurposed for more abstract thinking.

      I don't know if that's been supported by any science, though.

    2. Re:Language by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      Why can a child learn a new language easily while older brains can't?

      Because several stages of language acquisition (such a going from emitting a broad range of phonemes to just the "correct", and "correctly pronounced" phoneme set of the first language) seem to work by keeping the relevant neurons alive while the irrelevant ones die off.

      Before the end of each "critical period" for some particular aspect of the language, a child's brain is a language learning engine. After, learning that aspect of some language is like recovering from a stroke. An exception is that people who learn TWO or more languages before the relevant critical periods end (along with how to keep them sorted out) seem able to acquire more in later life without the difficulties of those who learned (no more than) one.

      Or at least that was the theory back in the early 1970s, when I took a "Psych of Language Acquisition" course as a distribution elective - in the same semester as a German class for the degree's language requirement - hoping to get some tips that might help with the language class. Instead I ended up sabotaging myself, having to go straight from the class claiming I couldn't possibly learn a new language (where I had to BELIEVE it to regurgitate what was wanted on tests in a timely fashion), directly to the class where I had to do the thing it was claimed was impossible. B-b

      Presuming this model (or something like it) is true: "Bilingual Education" - i.e. teaching immigrant kids in their native language until they're past those critical periods, rather than throwing them into English immersion classes while they're still language-flexible - looks more like a way to make them into members of a lifelong underclass than to help them learn. It curses them with an accent that they can't get rid of and impedes their learning of the language necessary for success in higher education and employment.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    3. Re:Language by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      The idea that a child can learn a new language faster than an adult or even old person: is just a myth.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    4. Re: Language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it's easier to force kids into doing things. If a child does not make progress, we scold it. If it still doesn't learn what it has been ordered to, we punish it. Further underperformance will result in its toys being broken to pieces and its pets killed. The little shit can't exactly move out you know. It can't even buy food, so we can starve it or force it to eat its own feces until grades improve. Adults? They shrug and go away or they respond with violence. And that's pretty much all there is to it.

    5. Re:Language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The saying in biology is "use it or lose it". Older brains are just out of practice.

    6. Re:Language by Archtech · · Score: 1

      The saying in biology is "use it or lose it". Older brains are just out of practice.

      Because they have been thinking, learning and solving problems for over 50 years - is that your argument?

      --
      I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
    7. Re:Language by q_e_t · · Score: 1

      Citation?

    8. Re:Language by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      There are thousands ... which one do you want, if you are so lazy to look for yourself?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    9. Re:Language by Solandri · · Score: 1

      An interesting thing happened when AI researchers first developed neural nets. They were great at learning how to do new things, but if you let them learn for too long they'd become "set in their ways" and unable to adapt to slight deviations in the data they were receiving. So the trick became to pick a good time to freeze the neural net's learning. Too early and the neural net wasn't as effective as it could be. Too late and it was too inflexible and began excluding answers which were right but not quite exact. You had to freeze its learning and development at just the right moment to maximize effectiveness while minimizing inflexibility. Once frozen, it could be reproduced in hardware, like the Xbox's Kinect sensor. No more learning, but its effectiveness was pretty much optimal for the hardware.

    10. Re:Language by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Why can a child learn a new language easily while older brains can't?
      Says who, exactly?
      Of course you can. It may not be quite as easy but you can. Anyone who tells you otherwise is either a liar or a fool.

    11. Re:Language by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      The purpose of the citation is to see what you choose, so we can laugh at you when it says something else.

      A person who independently checks will just find out you're full of shit; children do learn languages faster. Much faster.

      I don't doubt you read about a study, and that the study says what the study says. The part that is obvious bullshit is your broad phrasing.

      The closest you'll get to something that supports your claim is stuff based on brain scans, rather than actual learning, that suggests that the reasons children are better at learning language are not based on the traditional ideas about brain structure. It could still be caused by other differences in the brain, by hormonal differences that don't change the brain scan but do affect learning, or environmental factors.

      But your claim is so completely opposite to the results of studies that it stands out as a potential source of humor if we can get you to attempt to cite the study that you thought said what you said.

    12. Re:Language by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Children only learn faster. Your mistake is in making a false dichotomy between "can ... easy" and "can't."

      People of any age can learn a new language; if learning a new language was easy when you were a teenager, it will still be easy when you're middle aged. It will just take you longer. OTOH, your life experience will enrich your enjoyment of your new language skills, so it shouldn't actually seem that much harder to you.

      Adults who have a really hard time learning a new language probably suck at language generally; they probably have poor grammatical skills in their native language, and struggled in language-related classes in school.

      But definitely, if you're educating children in a different language than they'll need to have financial success as an adult, they will have reduced financial success as an adult.

      The age difference is in speed, not ability.

    13. Re:Language by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Because they haven't been, they've just been saying that they have been. Really, they just spew whatever words they think they remember, or whatever colloquialism their social group considers a Virtuous response to the situation.

      Just find out what they have strong feeling about, where they claim to have some "ideas," and take the exact same situation but with the labels removed, and where the subject and object are reversed compared to their bias, and most people will consistently spew the same pattern of speech that they used when the subject matched the reference scenario that their social group uses.

      It is rather uncommon to encounter an adult that actually thinks about anything; more often they merely reminisce and virtual signal. Children are more likely to actually think about something, because they get less value from reminiscing, and they're less likely to know what the Virtuous answer is.

    14. Re:Language by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      The question was not if a child learns a language faster (which it actually does not, it takes about 3 years to be considered fluent, and the first year they barely speak) but the claim that older people learn slower.

      Language learning in school is slow because (at last when I was in school) the teaching methods are wrong.

      If you use a modern language teaching method, you are half fluent in 3 month and fluent in 6 ... even if you learn japanese or chinese with their pictogram characters, you easy learn about 800 pictograms in 6 month, and a highschool graduate in japan is supposed to know about 1100.

      Perhaps you want to cite a study first that supports your claim :D then we can laugh at the date of the study ... The idea that children learn faster "for some reason" is outdated since 30 years, if not longer.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    15. Re:Language by mcswell · · Score: 1

      Few adult learners of languages are fluent, and almost none get to the same level in a language that native speakers of that language do, regardless of the teaching method. It's also the case that children learn their first (and sometimes second, if they grow up in a bilingual environment) almost automatically, without being taught; whereas very few adults can learn a language (well or otherwise) that way.

      BTW, I'm talking about spoken languages. Learning to read--whether it's Chinese writing or otherwise--is not "language learning" per se, although it may have some resemblance.

    16. Re:Language by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Yes, you reiterate the "common knowledge".
      That does not make it true.

      If you crash land in China, and get picked up by natives: three years later you speak chinese. There are thousands of documented cases of that. Albeit, always in medieval times, when language learning was so much easier :D

      In historic times it was common for travelers/traders to speak half a dozen languages. They picked them up traveling ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    17. Re:Language by mcswell · · Score: 1

      You want evidence? Try this: https://www.sciencedirect.com/...

      I'm assuming your para about thousands of people learning Chinese in three years is a joke. I believe there are also documented cases in medieval times of Krakens and Griffins and Basilisks, oh my...

      And yes, people can pick up a half dozen languages. If you add together the languages I've learned (and mostly forgotten), you could come up with a number like that: Spanish, German, Tzeltal, Shuar, French, Italian (plus of course English). (It helps that all but two are related, and three are closely related.) I suppose if I put them to use on a frequent basis, I might not have forgotten so much. But I would never have passed for a native speaker in any but English.

    18. Re:Language by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      As I said before: this is just a "stupid" reiteration of "common knowledge", which is wrong.
      Just like the "common knowledge" that brain cells don't regrow or other neurons.

      That the later "fact" is wrong is quite often a topic on /.
      The former fact is quite often in news sites, too. Language learning is easy, there is no special skill yo have a s child that gets lost when you grow up. A no brainier actually. How and why would that evolutionary work? Or biologically work? Some dead switch switching off a primary skill of every intelligent species (yes, I count dogs, ravens etc.) at a random young age? What purpose would that have in evolution?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  15. Re:Did you think? I do doubt that, denialist faggo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the fuck is going on you two?

    This is not 4chan

  16. Re:But, I thought "science is settled" by Rockoon · · Score: 1

    because it was soooo settled that nobody disagreed at all... yet here we are.

    --
    "His name was James Damore."
  17. Re: Trump is still headed for prison or the gallow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anti trump long winded traitor go to your cell

  18. When I was a teenager by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I also made a lot of another kind of cells, I doubt old people make as many of those cells...

  19. Re: Donald Trump is a genius. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last thing I expected anyone to say

  20. Re: Trump is still headed for prison or the gallo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trump owns and Iâ(TM)m voting for him again

  21. Re: Donald Trump is a genius. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Figures you repeating all the same nonsense we heard during the election. Dumb shit. Youâ(TM)re too stupid to be alive

  22. Re: Trump is still headed for prison or the gallo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "most likely to end up in Federal Prison" -Voted!

  23. Yes exactly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's required by law to record every communication with foreign governments. He has an entire staff there to do that. Putin had his staff, and press there, Trump blocked his. Including his own State dept head, CIA chief, his own people, his own people, people he chose, he blocked.

    Instead he came back from Helsinki, and we learned.... from Russian press.... that he's agreed to cooperation with Russia in Syrian, including putting US troops under Russian command to 'fight ISIS'.... three months after Russia attacked a US outpost, and while Russia was bombing allies in Syria. Huckerbee Sanders couldn't refute it. She claims she's been briefed on what was agreed, but wouldn't refute the claims made in the Russian press.

    We also learned that Russia would be allowed to investigate if there was collusion with Russia, letting them subpoena US Diplomatic staff. He literally put the Russian police in charge of the US political system.

    The Republicans to their credit blocked both of these.

    I get that you're a Trump supporter, or perhaps a Russian troll posing as a Trump supporter, but at some point he has to be cast adrift by the Republicans.

    The only people he lies to, are his supporters who get their news via Fox News, because that's the only channel that joins in on the lies. The rest pull up the clips of him saying the opposite, or the facts and numbers. Fox news, puts up fake smiles and flat out lies to its viewers. And only his supporters among the Fox News group are prepared to suspend disbelief. Some of Fox News viewers remember the details and know they are being lied to.

    If they'd been told from the outset, that he'd agreed with Putin's VTB Bank, to build Trump Tower Moscow, earnings $130 million from the deal. That VTB Bank was under US sanction, because it had a nest of spies in New York, going around property developers offering lucrative property deals in exchange for help lifting sanctions, back in 2012.... they would they have voted for him. He lied to them, Fox News repeated the lies, they had 'confirmation' and were suckered into the whole "Russian nothingburger" thing. Now we're learning the details, all the covert meetings with Russian intelligence, the money involved, the bank funding it, the Trump *SIGNED* contracts, a done deal.

    And VTB Bank? Well it was the bank with the missing that "accidentally" assigned $12 billion loan to an African state. i.e. they have $12 billion allocated to bribes of foreign politicians hidden in a fake loan to an African state that was never made. $12 billion hole that is unaccounted for.

    https://www.voanews.com/a/russian-bank-we-assigned-12-billion-loan-to-poor-african-state-by-mistake-/4677038.html

    Ever wonder why Rand Paul took a fake letter from Trump to Putin? A letter he asked Trump to write in the first place? Money! Power! $12 billion plus help in getting power buys a lot of influence.

    1. Re: Yes exactly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop committing blasphamy. Trump is God. He is the second coming of jesus. Islam will stop jihad once he builds that wall. They will see how great he is. He's withdrawing from their lands creating peace. They will worship him as the Mahdi and there will be peace on earth for 1000 years before the apocalypse when all the sinners are left on earth and we will all rise to meet trump in heaven.

    2. Re: Yes exactly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump will have a tower in Hell to share with Putin while he's raped for all eternity by evil men with big, non-toad-shaped cocks, just like he deserves. Fuck that traitor to pieces.

    3. Re: Yes exactly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like heaven to me.

  24. Temporary Resident by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    But, I thought "science is settled" and 97% of scientists agree?

    Science never settles, it is only ever temporarily resident. That's why when the laws change it has to move.

  25. Time to fist the nuns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Old people should be lashed together and used as a raft.

    1. Re:Time to fist the nuns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Old people should be lashed together and used as a raft."

      And here is the proof younger people are far more stupid the older people.

  26. Re:Did you think? I do doubt that, denialist faggo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the lie-implausibly-to-attempt-to-defend-the-traitor hour every hour on the hour.

  27. Re: Trump is still headed for prison or the gallow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're stupid, but not impenetrably so. Keep the kind of company you desire and you will be penetrated.

  28. Re: Donald Trump is a genius. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once he builds that wall he will be greater than all the previous presidents combined. I mean, the statue of liberty was made by some french dude and given as a gift. What's the next wonder structure, the hoover dam? Mt Rushmore, there's not enough space there to add Donald Trump.

  29. So, like maybe three or so? by Krishnoid · · Score: 4, Funny

    I mean, how many old people do you know that can still produce teenagers? Unless they already have them chained up in their basement or something.

    1. Re:So, like maybe three or so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "But what I really want is to direct!"

  30. Re: Donald Trump is a genius. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And Kuato too.

  31. Well no wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Old people brains show signs of "compromised cognitive-emotional resilience", or as it's otherwise known "becoming immune to the world".

    1. Re:Well no wonder by Archtech · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Old people brains show signs of "compromised cognitive-emotional resilience", or as it's otherwise known "becoming immune to the world".

      No doubt because they have learned enough about the world to understand how terrifying and irrational it can be.

      --
      I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
    2. Re:Well no wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not even close to what that phrase means. It sounds like your cognitive-emotional resilience has been compromised.

  32. Teenagers have brain cells? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

    Science finds us something new every day.

  33. Re: Trump is still headed for prison or the gallow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    McCain's headstone needs to be carved and used as a urinal. I'd pay to piss on it!

  34. Re:Trump is STILL PRESIDENT !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're clearly the exception to the rule, AC: Your brain stopped producing new neurons a long time ago, and didn't have that many to start with either.

  35. They used to say the same about our bodies by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1
    Much of the belief that older people "can't do this" and "can't do that" anymore is societal beliefs and not based in science.
    For instance too many people still believe that someone over, say, 40 years of age "can't build muscle" and "can't be physically fit" and "can't lose weight and will just get fat and stay fat" but that's all been disproven over and over again whether anyone wants to believe it or not -- it just requires you to be willing to do the work and suffer through the training to attain a level of fitness, lose excess weight, and so on. Furthermore this myth is perpetuated by older people who are inherently lazy to begin with, who use age as an excuse to not make the effort -- and in the process, become "crabs in a bucket" to their peers as often as not, not wanting others in their age group to better themselves, so making them look bad in the process.

    So it logically follows that your brain, being just more protoplasm like the rest of your body, follows the "use it or lose it" rule: if you don't challenge your brain, keep learning new things, keep thinking, and just let it sit there being useless, of course it'll just rot away to nothing.

    Also: since the rest of the systems of your body are in essence the support system for your brain, keeping the rest of your body physically fit as a lifestyle will enable your brain to function at a higher level of efficiency -- much as the featured article alludes to:

    However, the researchers also noted fewer blood vessels and connections between cells in the older brains, which Ms Boldrini said "may be linked to compromised cognitive-emotional resilience" in the elderly.

    Keep the support mechanisms in good working order, and your brain will likely be in better shape as you age.

    Better get on that treadmill, or bike, and get into the weight room a few days a week, folks. ;-)

    1. Re:They used to say the same about our bodies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, I'm still not buying your informercial fitness video!

    2. Re:They used to say the same about our bodies by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Here's my 'video' and it's free: Get off your fat lazy ASS and MOVE MORE. Repeat daily the rest of your life.

  36. we don't understand the brain by bigtreeman · · Score: 2

    The day before Dad died of the effects of dementia, he was very lucid and philosophical even though he could barely control his motor functions to speak, move his head, could move one hand only slightly or any other body control. It was difficult to hear what he said, but not for his lack of trying.

    --
    Go well