Slashdot Mirror


Motorola's RAZR Is Returning As a $1,500 Folding Smartphone (theverge.com)

A new report from The Wall Street Journal says the Motorola RAZR might be making a comeback as a $1,500 foldable screen smartphone, and it could launch as early as February. The Verge reports: The original RAZR was one of the most iconic cellphones ever made, and it seems that Motorola's parent company Lenovo is looking to cash in on that branding with an updated foldable phone (similar to the one that Samsung has teased for later this year). Per the WSJ, the new RAZR will be exclusive to Verizon in the U.S. with a planned February launch, although the device is still in testing and details have yet to be finalized.

Also unknown is nearly any concrete information about the phone. There's no word yet on things like screen size, specifications, or even form factor. Will the revived RAZR just borrow the name but use a more traditional landscape folding display? Will Lenovo follow the original RAZR design and have some sort of super long vertically folding screen? According to the WSJ report, Lenovo is hoping to manufacture over 200,000 of the new RAZRs, which may seem optimistic for a $1,500 luxury smartphone. But considering that the (admittedly much cheaper) RAZR V3 model sold 130 million units over its lifespan, if lightning does manage to strike twice, that goal might not be so hard to hit.

65 comments

  1. $1500 dupe by bobstreo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That is more than my monthly total mortgage payment.

    that's way too shiny a toy for most people.

    Since no information is available we'll have to wait to see if it has a removable battery, sd slot, or headphone jack...

    1. Re:$1500 dupe by bobstreo · · Score: 1

      forgot;

      originally posted:

      https://mobile.slashdot.org/st...

    2. Re:$1500 dupe by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

      That is more than my monthly total mortgage payment.

      that's way too shiny a toy for most people.

      This will be the simplified phone for people who hate those high Apple prices.

    3. Re:$1500 dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am starting to miss the good old days of phones. $2-300, and without all the distractions we have today. If the Razr could be resurrected pretty much like the original one, with slightly better screen etc, Id bite in a heartbeat.

    4. Re:$1500 dupe by stealth_finger · · Score: 2

      That is more than my monthly total mortgage payment.

      that's way too shiny a toy for most people.

      Since no information is available we'll have to wait to see if it has a removable battery, sd slot, or headphone jack...

      I'm going to assume not. You can't expect all the bells and whistles for that kind of price!

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    5. Re: $1500 dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember the stupid commercials with people singing and dancing (pre iPhone)? That phone was was throwing star you could really break things with it.

    6. Re:$1500 dupe by rednip · · Score: 1

      No need to 'miss those days' you can totally get a phone for even less right now. Even a quick search shows newly released 'clones' of the flagship iPhone for $300. If you don't mind tech that's just a few years old, a new battery in an old iPhone for $29 was a great deal and several manufacturers make brand new phones some even consider 'disposable'. Search for 'flip phone' you'll find dozens similar to the Razr. However, at the time it was popular, it wasn't cheap, also like all the phones of it's era it had both a proprietary headset AND charger. Don't forget a charger for the car and another for the office. To me it's just another example of seeing the past though rose colored glasses.

      However, what many seem to misunderstand is that phones used to come as part of a 2 year contract, the full unsubsidized prices were much higher. Phone plans now have 'unlimited data/text/voice' often for the same price that used to be for a dozen or so 'prime time' hours. These days they only offer installment plans on full price phones with continuing service; you can only find discounts on new equipment for new service (which is actually a rebate on an installment plan).

      --
      The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
    7. Re:$1500 dupe by e3m4n · · Score: 1

      I had the razr and didnt like it. Like most clam shell phones, they are too thin, making the art of balancing the earpiece between your shoulder and ear, while trying to use two hands for other tasks, damned near impossible. It was not comfortable. The only plus was butt dialing was almost eliminated.

    8. Re: $1500 dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh I completely agree. 100%

    9. Re: $1500 dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow, so you think nobody should have money because of how poor you are?

    10. Re:$1500 dupe by tehcyder · · Score: 2

      I had the razr and didnt like it. Like most clam shell phones, they are too thin, making the art of balancing the earpiece between your shoulder and ear, while trying to use two hands for other tasks, damned near impossible. It was not comfortable. The only plus was butt dialing was almost eliminated.

      If only someone could invent a hands free headset!

      Just a crazy dream, I know.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    11. Re: $1500 dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Says the AC posting from his mom's basement just before asking her if she'll pick up more ramen at the store for him because he's broke until next payday.

    12. Re:$1500 dupe by e3m4n · · Score: 1

      You mean something with only an hour of talk time that gets drained out my first two hours of work? Nope. I’ve never had to go out in the field to troubleshoot a network failure at a remote POP and be on the phone for six hours straight trying to diagnose fiber issues. I’ve never needed both hands to do that when my goddamn headset dies. Did I mention that the minute you fold the clamshell up it hangs up on you? You can’t answer a clamshell with it closed, or couldnt back then. Wired? At the time of the razr there were studies that suggested that the wire acted as a conduit thereby giving you even more of the high powered tdma right into your ear canal. Just like BPA, it shifted. BT was still in its intfancy back then. It was a bad fit for anything but short conversations at the time.

    13. Re:$1500 dupe by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      My current blue tooth headset lasts for 7 hours of talk time. Usually a little more. The one I had prior was good for 9 hours, but it finally broke after a couple of years. I would have bought the same model if they still made it. But the new one has better sound for both me and who I'm speaking with.

      I only had one Motorola clamshell in the past and it wasn't a Razer. But the one I had could be closed while talking via speaker or wired headset. It had caller ID on the front when it was closed and I could answer by pressing a button without opening it.

    14. Re:$1500 dupe by sjbe · · Score: 1

      that's way too shiny a toy for most people.

      If it's priced that high then it isn't intended to be sold to "most" people. If the device is compelling enough there are plenty of people who would consider forking over that kind of money for it. (probably self included) But it had better be AMAZING and well beyond anything else available to justify that kind of price point. I would love a well designed phone that morphed into a small tablet - the idea is pretty compelling if the execution is right. But getting it right is going to be tricky and none of the designs for folding phones I've seen so far are even close to hitting the mark.

      Since no information is available we'll have to wait to see if it has a removable battery, sd slot, or headphone jack...

      Is that REALLY what you judge a phone on? Seriously? You understand that most people demonstrably do not care about any of those features. Hundreds of millions of smartphones continue to sell without any of those features. It is HIGHLY unlikely to have at least two of those and the headphone jack is at best a 50/50 proposition for it being included. People care about what they are willing to fork over money for and it is abundantly clear that none of those features are deal breakers for most people in the market for smartphones. You might feel differently and that's totally fine but it puts you in a tiny minority of the overall market.

    15. Re:$1500 dupe by lgw · · Score: 1

      You you try a phone with his fancy new thing called a "headphone jack"! Apple and Samsung haven't gotten there yet, but some of the higher tech brands have this awesome feature. No separate battery, and lower battery drain on the phone in a noisy area.

      I do miss my old pre-smart phone for calls though - 10 hours talk time, and could be charging one battery while using another, quicker to swap batteries than to boot a modern phone.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    16. Re:$1500 dupe by Tensor · · Score: 1

      for $1500 it'd better fold out to an xps-13 with uhd display.

    17. Re:$1500 dupe by e3m4n · · Score: 1

      I’m fairly certain that you did not have a seven hour talk time Bluetooth headset when the razr was out. For me anything then or than an iPhone is just too thin. I have Bluetooth now but when I answer the phone it’s not like I can let the damn thing ring and ring and ring while I’m trying to finish out a headset. At least the speakerphone doesn’t create echo like they used to. They do however seem to pick up a lot of background noise.

          I do tend to go through a lot of headsets. It seems they give an IPX7 rating to just about anything now. Mine start failing around 4 - 6 months because I use them during my workouts and eventually one side will start cutting out and just fail entirely. It doesn’t seem to matter if the name brand is Sony, Pioneer, Jabra, or some unknown brand off Amazon. Heck my current amazon headphones have lasted twice as long as my Pioneer. I have a Jabra single piece that docks and recharges like an air bud. It only has 2.5hr talk time before having to re-dock it. It also seems to drain even when turned off. I could charge the whole thing for 3 hr and not use it over the weekend; come momday its dead. Thats, by far, my least fsvorite one.

    18. Re:$1500 dupe by e3m4n · · Score: 1

      Yea everyone is working on removing that jack and giving out adapters. Just one more thing to get lost or ‘lost’ in the bottom of a bag. I dont believe the bs that they needed that space. The damn phones keep getting bigger. The new xl size looks like someone is holding a small dinner plate to their face. They look like what we joked about with gillette shaving razors; that one day its going to have 15 blades and look like a coffee cup saucer was being drug against your face. Guess phones had to get there first.

    19. Re:$1500 dupe by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      That is more than my monthly total mortgage payment.

      You can probably get a mail-order bride now for less than the price of a Mobile Phone... probably last longer too.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    20. Re:$1500 dupe by yodleboy · · Score: 1

      "none of those features are deal breakers for most people in the market for smartphones"
        of course they aren't for iPhone users. They never had the option of having them and don't know what they're missing. The one thing they did have was a headphone jack and Apple took that away. Anecdotally, I know many iPhone users who would jump to Android if they weren't so heavily invested in the Apple ecosystem. I also know many Android users for whom those items ARE a deal breaker.

    21. Re:$1500 dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Much harder to turn off the speaker though...

    22. Re:$1500 dupe by tsqr · · Score: 1

      You you try a phone with his fancy new thing called a "headphone jack"! Apple and Samsung haven't gotten there yet, but some of the higher tech brands have this awesome feature.

      The Samsung S9 has a headphone jack and a memory card slot. My S8+ has a headphone jack and a card slot. My old S6+ didn't have a card slot, but it did have a headphone jack. Maybe you're confusing Samsung with Google? I hear the Pixels don't have headphone jacks.

    23. Re:$1500 dupe by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Nah, just like with my Note 8 (headphone jack, SD card slot), Samsung is getting lazy and leaving those features in whilst designing new phones. Sometimes I am so embarrassed to be seen with a phone without any courage...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    24. Re:$1500 dupe by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Motorola is making those phones today. Stop looking at flagships.

      --
      Good-bye
    25. Re:$1500 dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duplicate story on Moto vaporware; nothing yet on EDNS FlagDay...

    26. Re:$1500 dupe by lgw · · Score: 1

      Samsung is on the "no jack" bandwagon with some new phones, though they're less committed to it than Apple. I got an LG because they went the other way, saying not only do they love the jack, they added audiophile DACs to it for music listening. Not sure that matters, but I like their spirit.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    27. Re:$1500 dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, what many seem to misunderstand is that phones used to come as part of a 2 year contract

      They did? Where? I don't ever remember it being that way and I've had a mobile phone since the mid 1990s. You always bought your phone first and then chose your carrier.

    28. Re: $1500 dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm it worked this way in the USA for years. At least 10.

    29. Re: $1500 dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's a payday? Is that a loan?

  2. Returning from it last appearance... by enriquevagu · · Score: 2
  3. Luxury industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Luxury industry is (still) booming (especially in China), and everyone wants a slice of the pie. But since you won't buy hundreds of RAZRs even if you could afford it (barring a Imelda Marcos-type pathology), this industry will dry out as the upper class becomes smaller and smaller (while its individuals become richer and richer).

    At the end, it's crash-bang.

  4. Complete idiocy, are you Windy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nuff said

  5. Well... by mridoni · · Score: 1

    This double post is proof that, at least on Slahdot, lightning may actually strike twice, and usually does.

    1. Re: Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It must be the CSS - they are incorporating so many files by reference without a CMS I am surprised it isnt just the same story reposted over and over and over and over and over ... again

  6. 200.000 units by sad_ · · Score: 1

    shouldn't be too hard to find 200.000 idiots with too much money on this planet.

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
    1. Re: 200.000 units by guacamole · · Score: 1

      Everyone wants a fondling phone.

  7. Still have my RAZR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a good thing I held onto my trusty old RAZR. Everything old is new again! W00t!

    1. Re: Still have my RAZR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thatâ(TM)s evil. I just had to laugh! RAZR RAZR No. 1!

    2. Re:Still have my RAZR by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      Works about as well as my 2G iPhone.

  8. Original RAZR by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
    Found it too thin to hold. So another thin phone is not my cup of tea, even if I convince my self to pay 1500 for a phone.

    But motorola Android One phones are the replacement for the Google Nexus line. No crapware added by the manufacturer and Google updates android straight, not waiting for the manufacturer. So would buy a Moto X1 or something but this one is too late to the party. Average sale price of cell phones are trending down, not up.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Original RAZR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't care about the thinness, but the width was more than I cared to hold. It felt awkward in my hands.

    2. Re:Original RAZR by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I didn't care about the thinness either, and the width was perfect for my massive, ape-like hands. That was a pretty good phone hardware-wise. Too bad the software was so awful.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Original RAZR by scdeimos · · Score: 1

      The RAZR was bad software, to be sure. The radio stack kept on silently crashing meaning you'd stop receiving calls and messages. The only way you found out it wasn't working was when you tried to make a call or send an SMS and it just sat there looking stupid. Awful phone, they should have stayed in the grave.

  9. manufacturers are missing out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why charge only 1500 when they could try 150000? same with medicine - my medicine used to cost $25 per month - it's now $1000 per month which I don't/can't buy - they should also raise the price of my medicine to $100000 per month so the can get even more of my no money

  10. If they can delete comments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why cant we delete dupe articles?

  11. Not a phone for Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This isn't a phone for anywhere else but Asia. This is something to go after the high end Chinese market, which isn't saturated, and where people there are still new to phones and will happily pay $1500 for a device, as it looks cool and boosts their social credit score, as they bought domestically.

  12. Depends on the design by sjbe · · Score: 1

    I make it a policy to never judge before seeing a device. Maybe it will be brilliant but I have my doubts based on what I've seen so far. If it's like Samsung Galaxy F or Royole Flexpai then they shouldn't bother. That form factor is impractical and doesn't appear to be very robust. (it looks terribly easy to break if you put it in a pocket) I think the basic idea of a device that can morph from a phone size to small tablet size is a solid concept but it will all be about the execution. I don't think the bendy screens will be the best way to get there but I'm willing to be proven wrong.

    And $1500? It better be an AMAZING device to justify that price point.

    I think dusting off the RAZR nameplate is idiotic. The device shares no heritage or design with the original and anyone who is nostalgic for the original RAZR never really had to live with one. It was fine for the day but was more flash than performance. Aside from the eye catching design it was an entirely unremarkable phone in a market full of equally unremarkable phones. Relying on the hope for nostalgia from a 20 year old dumb phone to market a (supposedly) cutting edge modern smartphone should result in some marketing idiot losing their job.

    1. Re:Depends on the design by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

      I make it a policy to never judge before seeing a device.

      Fair enough...

      And $1500? It better be an AMAZING device to justify that price point.

      I can't think of any single (realistic) feature that will make a phone be worth that price. I can't think of any combination of realistic features that will make a phone be worth that price.

      This phone better be something out of Science Fiction.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    2. Re:Depends on the design by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Relying on the hope for nostalgia from a 20 year old dumb phone to market a (supposedly) cutting edge modern smartphone should result in some marketing idiot losing their job.

      It worked. It is being talked about here and many other forums/news sites. Marketing-wise it is already a success.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    3. Re:Depends on the design by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      I phone that didn't butt dial all the time would be nice... but still not worth the $1500 price.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  13. Am I the only one who didn't like the RAZR? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Like everyone, I had one at the time.

    Like everyone, I thought they looked cool.

    But I seem to remember not liking the design much. Didn't the edges cut into your hands when open? And I seem to remember something about the side buttons being maddening...

    Maybe this rebirth will address physical issues from the past model.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  14. Marketing isn't successful unless it gets sales by sjbe · · Score: 2

    It worked. It is being talked about here and many other forums/news sites. Marketing-wise it is already a success.

    It only worked if the name results in actual sales because of the name. Just generating buzz is not successful marketing. Personally I think they are hugely overestimating the appeal of the RAZR brand in today's market. Furthermore you aren't asking whether we are talking about it because of the RAZR brand or because of the fact that it's foldable or because of the price or something else.

    Brand confusion is a real thing too. Think about how Microsoft has had problems when they've used the Windows brand on devices that aren't what we expect. Windows RT is a prime example.

  15. Marketing expense? by sjbe · · Score: 1

    I can't think of any single (realistic) feature that will make a phone be worth that price. This phone better be something out of Science Fiction.

    I'm struggling as well. I think you are right that the technology just isn't there yet for the things needed to seriously blow our minds. Would love to be wrong of course. I think it's just going to be an overpriced me-too device made to keep the Motorola brand quasi-relevant rather than a serious attempt at a serious device.

  16. Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does that mean that a superior krzr (k1m) will suddenly appear with only the necessary features done well, good battery life, and a phone-like form factor that is actually conducive to making and receiving calls?

    No?

    I am disappoint.

  17. I Don't Get This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone else think that, from a 2019 point of view, the really distinctive feature of the RAZR was they keypad?

    This is one of the reasons why I don't get this. How do you make a RAZR style keypad desirable and relevant to a smartphone in 2019? Physical keypads have famously become rare, and are mostly features of long-gone phones.

    Next up is the phone OS. The RAZR OS is a non-starter in 2019. OK, so Android seems like the only logical replacement (I'll summarily dismiss Sailfish, WebOS, Windows Phone, Ubuntu Phone, etc.). What is the connection then, to the RAZR? A phone wallpaper?

    Finally there's the price. $1500 for a smartphone is simply too much money. Apple is having trouble selling the iPhone X at price points above $1000; and if Apple can't sell at that price point, I don't think Motorola/Lenovo can either.

    There's only one way I can see this working, as a vanity phone. Bling the crap out of it, encrust it with Swarovsky crystals, maybe do custom case designs, sell it as a low-volume, high style (and high margin) phone. Hell, maybe set it with actual diamonds and raise the price even more! Do a marketing deal with Luis Vuitton, or Prada, or Givenchy. You need style cred with this play so the name brand association matters.

    1. Re:I Don't Get This by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      I loved my G1 phone with pullout keypad; you could actually touch-type on it without looking. Unfortunately, my ex took it on vacation with her and didn't bring it back -- she claims it stopped working, I suspect she just sold it.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  18. Loved the original RAZR by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    But at a $1500 price point, it will sell in the DOZENS!
    At a $500 price point, it would sell millions...

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  19. $1500 by nightfire-unique · · Score: 1

    $1500.. for a device that will most likely have its battery glued inside, meaning it's designed to require an expensive repair every 18-24 months.

    Hard pass.

    --
    A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
  20. LMFAO!!! by sentiblue · · Score: 1

    This is awesome!!! $1500 for dumb phuck flip phone.

  21. The only thing I want less than a 3D TV... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is a goddamned folding phone

  22. Wow by BabyMaker · · Score: 1

    Wow, this is awesome