Slashdot Mirror


Russian Hackers Allegedly Attempted To Breach the DNC After the 2018 Midterms (fortune.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Fortune: Russian hackers attempted to breach Democratic National Committee email addresses in a spear-phishing campaign just after the 2018 midterms, according to a DNC court document filed Thursday night. "The content of these emails and their timestamps were consistent with a spear-phishing campaign that leading cybersecurity experts have tied to Russian intelligence," reads the complaint. "Therefore, it is probable that Russian intelligence again attempted to unlawfully infiltrate DNC computers in November 2018." The complaint [...] said there is no evidence that the attempted hack in Nov. 2018 was successful.

Spear-phishing campaigns involve sending emails that appear to be from a trusted source in order to gain confidential information. According to CNN, the emails in question appeared to have been sent from a State Department official and contained a PDF attachment that, if opened, would allow the hacker access to the recipient's computer. The timing and content of these emails were consistent with the practices of the Russian hacking group known as Cozy Bear, one of the two groups that hacked the DNC prior to the 2016 U.S. presidential election. According to the cybersecurity firm FireEye, Cozy Bear attempted to hack over 20 entities in Nov. 2018, including clients in local government, transportation, defense, law enforcement, and military.

127 comments

  1. This is unsurprising given the trend. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    What's surprising is that Republicans willfully support blatant treason and hacking groups because they truly consider them less adversarial to their perverse nazi authoritarian ideology than the rest of America. Rope is coming, traitors.

    Trump will hang for his crimes. You decide if you should hang next to that coward. This is apolitical, you support attacks on the US political process or either party, you are a traitor and should hang. Period.

    1. Re:This is unsurprising given the trend. by XopherMV · · Score: 0

      What's surprising is that Republicans willfully support blatant treason and hacking groups...

      What, you think the Russians only hacked the Democrats? The Russians went after the Republicans as well. Only, the Russians didn't release the Republican emails. Why? What do you think? To use as kompromat. That's why Republicans are going along with Trump. Russia has dirt on them as well.

    2. Re: This is unsurprising given the trend. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given that all GOP members voted for sanctions before the 2016 election and now very few do, it is clear that Russia owns them.

      numbnuts

    3. Re:This is unsurprising given the trend. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd love that to be true.
      Here's the truth: The DEMS are in bed with Russia. It's just disinformation.

    4. Re:This is unsurprising given the trend. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, all of Trump's allies and family having all sorts of Russian ties and Trump, his administration and formerly hostile to Russia congressional and senate GOP going Putin's bidding and it is the Dems in bed with Russia?

      You Trumpanzees are so brain-dead delusional it is a wonder that you fucktards remember to breathe.

      numbnuts

  2. Probably Barron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know he is a wiz at computers.

  3. omg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    orange man good

    1. Re:omg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Orange man just lack the filter between his brain and mouth.. maybe that's why he has a large following.. he *really* speaks his mind..

      The real question is... How the heck where they unable to find two better candidates than Hillary and Trump?

  4. Take some tablets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, you seem to be the only person who hasn't figured out the 'orange man bad' innuendo is a mass stream of bullshit.

    1. Re:Take some tablets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell it to Mueller, tell it to the Warden, tell it to Satan when you see them, in that order. Trump is getting buried under the prison, traitor. Deal with it snowflake.

  5. Re:We're still pushing this BS? by Joviex · · Score: 0

    Still going for this BS? Is this the "if we make enough smoke, people will eventually believe there's fire" strategy?

    Its bullshit according to the anonymous coward. KK. Or maybe you are KKK?

    Just because you wish it wasn't true, doesn't make it untrue, just like your idiotic argument.

    Facts probablly your brain I guess.

    /shrug

  6. Why not ask? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe trump will go on national TV again and ask the Russians for them a second time. After all, it got the job done within a week of asking the first time.

  7. In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Throw up a $5/mo VPS n the Internet and SCAWY WUSSIANS will attempt to hack it within ten minutes of eth0 coming up.

    Bonus: You'll also get CHINESE COMMUNISTS, as well as various Eastern Europeans, Southern Americans and half the Amazon cloud trying to pwn your shit, too.

  8. Re:We're still pushing this BS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    We're coming up on three years since the "hack" supposedly happened. The DNC has produced absolutely no evidence it actually happened. WikiLeaks has come out and flat-out said they didn't receive the email dump from Russia or any state. There's a lot of circumstantial evidence it was an inside job: if you look at timestamps created when files were copied off the system, you'll see that they show evidence that someone copied the files off the server using a USB thumbstick.

    Face it, just because the "blue wave" failed to materialize and Trump remains extremely popular despite the Democrat Shutdown, doesn't mean that Russia was involved in the election. There is no evidence that they were. All actual facts point to Hillary being a record unpopular candidate who Americans resoundingly rejected. Accept that Democrats just aren't that popular, and that real Americans side with Trump.

  9. Re:Seems like a lot of wasted effort by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given than half the current members of Congress would happily give any communist anything they wanted, seems like rather a waste of good hacking talent to try and come in through the front door.

    Apparently they wanted the other half as well.

    Also, technically the Russians are not communists any more, but it seems a lot of people have been living under rocks these 20-odd years.

  10. Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Russians and the Chinese try to hack EVERYONE. All the major corporations, no matter what they produce. All the politicians, no matter what their party. All the banks, all the universities, all the tech firms - all of it.

    Trying to play off standard, everyday behaviors as special and indicative of something deeper, as is done here. turns normal news into storytime fiction.

    1. Re:Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exact! There is no evidence Russia is anything but normal relations to USA. All "hacks" are just normal everyday stuff as always done by everyone! Amazing President Trump has always said there is no connections to Russia for him and still no proof has ever come out, Stop listening to liberal media!

    2. Re:Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny they never managed to release Trump's tax returns or anything though isn't it?

    3. Re:Fake News by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      This is untrue.

      Any org with anything valuable is hardened against these attacks. Especially the DNC after they were hacked before.

      To get in now requires significant resources. Directed phishing attacks, zero day exploits, skilled operators. The Russians only have so many of them and they can't be hacking every major corporation, all the politicians, all the banks, all the universities, all the tech firms, all of it at once.

      They choose where to direct their resources. And naturally when Trump was weakened by the midterms they directed those resources to support him.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't work in cybersecurity do you?

      I was asked by an auditor if there was any evidence of attack attempts on a business just the other day - there are THOUSANDS of attempts per day from all over the world. That my client is hardened doesn't mean the attacks aren't attempted. From network probing to phishing emails to virus attacks to social engineering.

      Attacks come for all over the world, from everyone, sometimes even grandma who's machine has been coopted by someone building a net.

      Hell ISRAEL even released a multimedia pirating app a few years ago that became very popular because it was excellent at that, but it ended up also being a launchpad for Israeli intelligence to perform distributed hacking.

      Claims being made attributing attacks to anyone is complete bollocks - and every piece of evidence that has been shown has proven to prove nothing at all. f you've been keeping up with the Vault 7 releases you'll know that it is STANDARD PROCEDURE for US intelligence services hacking operations to do things like compile attack tools outside of US working hours so that they can be attributed to someone else.

      All we really have here is a new red scare because Russia Opposes the stupidity of the US State Department supported and operated regime change operations in the Middle East, and unless people are preconditioned to consider Russia an enemy they may actually give some credence to the statements made by Russia regarding things like the false flag chemical attacks in Syria (which turned out to be exactly that) and the US CIA operating/equipping/directing/cooperating with ISIS/ISIL/Al Nusrah/Al Qaeda in Syria (Which turned out the be exactly that).

      We're in another Vietnam type situation where we are being lied to constantly to support other interests.

    5. Re: Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brainwashed monkey repeats propaganda he heard on Fox News. News at 11.

  11. Re:We're still pushing this BS? by sdinfoserv · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually fucktard, in September of '15 the FBI contacted the DNC telling them at least 1 computer had been compromised. Evidence in any FBI investigation is not, nor ever has been publicly released, so, no - YOU will never see it. The FBI's information was substantiated by FireEye, a company that makes security firewalls.
    But then again, you're likely one of those "deep state" paranoids who has no time to be bothered with facts.

  12. Nuke Em! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No Seriously! We know exactly where these hacks are coming from. A few well placed cruise missiles with conventional weapons should do the trick.

  13. Where is the evidence? by BlueCoder · · Score: 1

    I only hear claims. How can they be sure it did not come from somewhere else? It's trivial to reroute though other computers in the same country or other countries. I can not see how the US can be aware of every single connection going in and out of every country...(probabilistic matching incoming and outgoing streams to determine proxies). Russia and China along with other not quite US friendly countries in that region have direct connections. But supposing they did there are ways to disguise the data to make them sufficiently unmatchable. Further nowadays these things are done via script and fully automated. There are reasons for countries to make it seems like data is coming from one another.

    Russia and China are full of technologically sophisticated people fully capable of hacking with their own agendas.

    1. Re:Where is the evidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can't be. They have jack shit, and it could be anyone.

      You'd expect the people that come to slashdot to have at least half a technical clue, but since it was deemed an influential social media site we've had all sorts of shitbirds coming on spouting crap.

    2. Re:Where is the evidence? by Highdude702 · · Score: 0

      Shh this is slashdot, we don't get into all that technical stuff. Plus were trying to bash trump here some more.. cmon man..

    3. Re:Where is the evidence? by Jeremi · · Score: 2

      What sort of evidence are you expecting to see? System logs? Mail dumps from peoples' inboxes? Testimony from sysadmins?

      And if someone was to take you aside and show you this evidence, would your viewpoint change, or would you dismiss it as 'easily faked'?

      Perhaps it is just the nature of the Internet, and hacking, that evidence cannot be conveyed across it in a way that would meet your demands. If so, then it's hardly surprising that you have "only heard claims", since that is all you are able to hear from your position.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    4. Re:Where is the evidence? by eaglesrule · · Score: 1

      That's a good point. The DNC and by association their paid consultants are so untrustworthy that the burden of proof for any of their claims to be taken seriously is probably insurmountable. There is no benefit of the doubt to be granted to an organization where rule number one is that the ends justify the means, of which history has shown time and time again.

      3rd party that doesn't have a conflict of interest to provide testimony or evidence to collaborate? That's a start. Same for both sides.

    5. Re:Where is the evidence? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Just add the bit that was censored out. 'People with IP addresses in the Russian IP address range', of course that don't sell anything and of course once it hits Russia, they don't know anything beyond that, the person could be next door and route it all over the place, with servers rented in Russia from Australia or in China from Japan. All meaningless twaddle. Fuck Americans complain and phishing attacks when they are launching actual missiles and cleaning people all over the world, ohh boo hoo, your idiot employees are clicking emails they are not meant to, nor that you have set up filters to block but keep on actually killing people because that is a good thing.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    6. Re: Where is the evidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the bashing isn't warranted? The president isn't a huge piece of shit? Are you denying this?

      He is probably one of the most ruthless criminals we have ever seen. Multiple lawsuits against the guy, multiple bankrupts, multiple accusations.

      If it smells like shit...it's a turd.

    7. Re:Where is the evidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      get the fuck off this website you god damn faggot

  14. The data walked out by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    It was a US domestic political event with a human walking out with data to give to the media.
    A Pentagon paper event totally internal to the USA and US politics.
    Random spear-phishing attempts did not move data out as it was done by a person in person.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  15. Re:We're still pushing this BS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Sure, I'm just paranoid.

    We have text messages of FBI agents saying they wanted to throw the election for Hillary, we have the head of the FBI lying about Hillary's crimes to try and convince the country to vote for her, but claiming the existence of some sort of "deep state" is just paranoia. Just ignore all that evidence of its existence. Right.

  16. Phishing is not hacking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And not very "targeted", either. You should see all the phishing "attacks" I am inundated with daily. hahaha.

    1. Re: Phishing is not hacking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are an idiot and don't know how phishing works. Just because you think it's random doesn't mean it is.

      Almost every phishing attack is targeted.

  17. Re:We're still pushing this BS? by sdinfoserv · · Score: 4, Informative

    as to your "blue wave" comment, just looking at the numbers..
    Dems took 40 House seats away from the GOP. On the State level, the Dems took 7 Governors away from the GOP, 6 legislatures and over 300 State House and Senate seats. So if you're calling the GOP flipping 3 Senate seats a "win", you're delusional. 350+ (Blue Flipped) Vs 3 (Red Flipped) is a MASSIVE blue wave by any measurement. Sorry Sparky, go back and sniff more FauxNoise coolaid.

  18. Re:We're still pushing this BS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The president's party always loses seats in the midterms. It was true for Obama as well. The "blue wave" was expected to be overwhelming, and it ... just didn't happen. We got a relatively normal midterm. Attempts to hype it up as something earthshattering are just false - turnout was slightly higher than expected, but still lower than presidential election years. You saw about an average swing. Sorry, the "blue wave" was just a normal blue trickle, and it'll almost certainly be entirely reversed in 2020, especially if Trump can remind voters of the record shutdown the Democrats caused the instant they had even a whiff of power.

  19. Re:Seems like a lot of wasted effort by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you haven't been living under a rock since Putin took power you would see that he desires authoritarian control and wishes to take back what was once the USSR. While we don't know if his ultimate goal is communism his position in the party earlier in his life could make for an easy logical estimate.

  20. Re:We're still pushing this BS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    denial is a river in Africa.....

  21. Re:We're still pushing this BS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What the fuck are you talking about? The Republicans controlled the house when the shutdown started, dipshit. They had control of the house for two years, and for those two years, the wall didn't seem that important.

    Perhaps they should've focused on building the wall instead giving the super rich a tax cut.

  22. Cyber-guerrilla-warfare by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    I think at this point, anyone who doesn't take an overall look at Russian operations all over the world, and the general ambitions of Vladimir Putin, who doesn't see that this is all a form of guerrilla warfare isn't paying close enough attention, is in denial, or is one of their extraterritorial operatives whitewashing the whole thing. What we're seeing are just the early stages of the overall agenda and gameplan.

    1. Re:Cyber-guerrilla-warfare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes indeed. Those dastardly Russians seem to be hell bent on leaking the internal communications of the DNC to the public.
      How the fuck are the Democrats meant to win any elections when people know the shady shit they're up to?

    2. Re:Cyber-guerrilla-warfare by iMadeGhostzilla · · Score: 1

      When the DNC was hacked in 2016, Democrats themselves said there was nothing of significance in those emails. And there wasn't. With both parties airing their craziness out in the open (with Dems heavily in the lead, by my opinion), I can't imagine what 2018 DNC or RNC email hack would have changed.

    3. Re:Cyber-guerrilla-warfare by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      You are dumb. Do you know what '''destabilizing a country''' means, or is that too many big words for you?

    4. Re:Cyber-guerrilla-warfare by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      I'll say the same thing I said to the AC above you but in a nicer way: I believe things like this to be an overall campaign of destabilizing Western countries which can be nothing but beneficial to governments like Russia and China, both of which have expansionist ambitions. It doesn't matter what data they did or did not get, what does matter is that they're creating chaos and distrust and helping create divisiveness. Just here in the U.S. we've got half the country looking to '''stick it''' to the other half because they do not like nor trust them based on their political leanings, we've got an extremist President who, probably unwittingly, is helping create more divisiveness, and now we've got most of the Government shut down for a historically record number of days, and both major political parties at odds with each other, stalemated, which means nothing of value is getting done.
      PUT ASIDE whatever your partisan political beliefs and leanings are for a moment or two and look at the bigger picture: our Nation, at the moment, can't get out of it's own way. If I was the leader of another country and I had an overall plan of political and eventually military conquest of neighboring countries, and NATO countries are what are standing in my way, I'd be breaking out the good booze and passing the bottle around to celebrate things going so well for me, seeing both the U.S. and the UK in disarray and chaos from their own internal strife that *I* and my forces created within them.

      Now let's talk for a moment about the UK, since I mention them: do you really think the Brexit affair started entirely internal to the UK, with no outside influences? Think again, U.S. Intelligence reports have said othewise, just like MI6 has also said. The UK is in a similar state of chaos and disarray as the U.S. because of the whole Brexit fiasco; they also are too distracted by it and can't get out of their own way.

      Here's another example I can come up with off the top of my head: Catalonia and Spain. Do you really think it's just coincidence that the tensions between Catalonia and Spain over Catalonias' desire to be independent and self-governing just suddenly flared up into the conflicts they've seen over there? Note again that Spain is a NATO member country, just like the U.S. and the UK. Note also I'm not saying that Russia and/or China (although I'd think Russia really) created that conflict, but the potential and the tensions were already there for a long time now and all it would take is a nudge in the right direction to cause the tensions to explode into a conflict.

      How about France? Sure, the French are a passionate people and protest is in their blood, but I would not at all be surprised if these 'Yellow Vest' protests, which are now becoming violent, are being amplified via -- you guessed it -- Social Media, and I wouldn't at all be surprised that if they are, you could trace key parts of that back to non-French sources, or foreign nationals within French borders.

      I'd have to go dive deep into news stories from varied sources, but I wouldn't at all be surprised, either, if I looked at incidents in all key NATO countries right now, that I'd find Social Media fanning the flames of those conflicts -- and that if you traced them to their sources, you'd find them to either be from other countries, or from foreign nationals in-country.

      Russia would love nothing better than to have NATO break up; it's the only thing that's prevented Russian expansionism since before the wall fell. Vladimir Putin is former KGB and from his background and pattern of behavior it's clear he would love nothing better than his historical legacy to be creating Soviet Union 2.0. Destabilizing the European Union and destroying (or at least weakening) NATO will be at the top of his To-Do List. Furthermore the Russia/Crimea/Ukraine situation is both on his To-Do List as well as him testing the waters with NATO, the EU, and the U.N. to see how much

    5. Re:Cyber-guerrilla-warfare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just for the record protestors in France mostly know that the European Union is the enemy of the people and if pressed about NATO, they might disparage it as well. NATO just is far less if ever brought into public debate (media and politicians usually have little reason to talk about it)

      if these 'Yellow Vest' protests, which are now becoming violent, are being amplified via -- you guessed it (...)

      Violence is constant or sometimes receding. In fact around 4:30 PM to 5 PM on Saturdays, the police deliberately spreads gasses massively and other bullcrap like grenades and water jets unprovoked, most protesters go away, say there are 10,000 in a town ("officially" around half that number or less) and 1,000 remain for another hour or two afterwards. The remainders are branded (afterwards, on TV) as radical or violent elements whether they're rioting or just sticking around. They set fire to trash and discarded Christmas trees.

      Catalonia? I have not studied that extensively. You know what, Spain sided with Russia by refusing to recognize Kosovo.
      Ukraine? This mess was started by the US and UK etc. I dare say there are many Ukrainians in Ukraine too.

      Bottom line: Look deeper. None of these things are random acts,

      Maybe, but people doing stuff can also be doing it out of their own motivations.

    6. Re:Cyber-guerrilla-warfare by iMadeGhostzilla · · Score: 1

      Consider that Western societies have reached a level of neuroticism not seen since the time of Victorian England, with its deadly catalyst in the form of social media. Take a look at anything non-Trump, non-politics related to see how quickly people get upset and divided over it. Those can't all be Russians. And even when it is politics, you have say the image of Cathy Griffin holds Trump's mock severed head spreading over social media and people get worked up to a frenzy -- you don't need Russians for that. All this is a phase in the evolution of the collective mind.

    7. Re:Cyber-guerrilla-warfare by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      You're missing the point, AC: peoples '''own motivations''' can get amplified by foreign operatives if their '''own motivations''' serve the interests of a foreign power. So a carefully crafted bot-net nudge here and there, and people just venting their frustrations peacefully on Facebook or Twitter gets turned into a physical protest out on the streets; add some infiltrators to the protest to both start a physical confrontation with police, and to '''get attacked and injured''' (perhaps faked) by police, and now you've got a full-on conflict that's polarizing people who had nothing to do with any of it. Rinse, repeat as required. If successful you can turn an entire nation on it's ear.

    8. Re:Cyber-guerrilla-warfare by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      ..okay, you also are not getting it. Read this other comment: https://slashdot.org/comments.... these things don't need to be created out of wholecloth by foreign operatives, in fact it works better if it's NOT '''created''' by them, they just use resentment that's already there to start with.

    9. Re:Cyber-guerrilla-warfare by iMadeGhostzilla · · Score: 1

      You're making it sound like there's merely resentment underneath the surface and the operatives are exploiting it to turn it into a crisis. Whereas I'm saying there is a half-madness going on and what operatives do is no more than a noise.

      It's the difference akin to psychologically pressuring a vulnerable person vs. taunting a deranged person in the street.

    10. Re:Cyber-guerrilla-warfare by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      I see that whereas I'm attempting to analyze what I see and read from various news sources in as objective and unbiased a way as possible, you're clinging to your own personal beliefs, biases, and opinions. As such we can't have a real conversation about this subject because you've clearly already made up your mind already. Good-bye.

    11. Re:Cyber-guerrilla-warfare by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      The Americans themselves are destabilizing the country. This undying "Russia" bullshit from the democrats is a perfect example.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    12. Re:Cyber-guerrilla-warfare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A republican AG orders a former FBI director (also a republican) to investigate russian collusion, and you twits keep blaming it on the democrats.

      And you wonder why we make fun of you deplorables.

    13. Re:Cyber-guerrilla-warfare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bla bla bla... keep regurgitating that propaganda, boy! Projection is working very well for you people!

    14. Re:Cyber-guerrilla-warfare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fuck off Ivan

  23. The stupidity here is palpable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes. I already knew this because I don't have my head shoved up my own butthole like whoever thought this was brilliant and breaking news.

    1. Re: The stupidity here is palpable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Replace trumps name with Obama and you fsggots would be all over this story. Hypocrites.

      Where are those fema camps Obama was gonna put white people in? Why didn't he declare martial law? Fucking idiots.

  24. Re:We're still pushing this BS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    Actually fucktard, in September of '15 the FBI contacted the DNC telling them at least 1 computer had been compromised. Evidence in any FBI investigation is not, nor ever has been publicly released, so, no - YOU will never see it. The FBI's information was substantiated by FireEye, a company that makes security firewalls.

    But then again, you're likely one of those "deep state" paranoids who has no time to be bothered with facts.

    Who's the fucktard? With no time to be bothered by facts?

    Why the hell should the FBI be believed?

    That's a serious question.

    This is the same biased FBI that knowingly ignored the fact that the Steele dossier was totally unverified and paid for by Hillary, and used it as the basis to spy on Trump anyway.

    Or are you going to claim that Bruce Ohr lied under oath when he testified to all of that? (Got the balls to try and find that and actually learn some facts the media doesn't want to report, or do you need me to give you a LMGTFY link?)

    And if doing THAT - using the government intelligence services to spy on a political opponent - doesn't cause you to cry at the coming death of democracy in the US, you're just a blind partisan hack. And have nothing to cry about should Trump turn the tables when he gets an Attorney General who knows how to actually run the Department of Justice (and that's just a few days or weeks away...).

  25. Re: We're still pushing this BS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    As much as you would wish it to be not true, doesnâ(TM)t make it false, there is a strong connection:

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/how-the-russians-hacked-the-dnc-and-passed-its-emails-to-wikileaks/2018/07/13/af19a828-86c3-11e8-8553-a3ce89036c78_story.html?utm_term=.7f5f14fdd746

  26. DNC Secrets? by edi_guy · · Score: 1

    Good, maybe someone in the FSB will be able to figure out the Dems political strategy, 'cause I sure can't.

  27. Jail Her! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why isn't she in Jail?

    Trump needs to build 2 walls!

  28. Re:We're still pushing this BS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Which is why the spending bill had passed the House before the shutdown started. Where it failed was the Senate, where Democrats used the filibuster to block it until the new session of Congress happened and they could use their new power in the House to keep the government closed.

    Like I said, they got a hint of power and immediately used it to shut down the government, even before they were seated.

  29. Re:Blue Coder thinks he's in the FBI now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey everybody, the "faggot" guy is back! I've really come to enjoy the way you garnish every post with sprinklings of that fantastic word.
    Don't be a stranger now, you hear? Don't go doing anything stupid like getting a job or finding something more worthwhile to do. You just spend all day hanging out here spreading your glorious word. The world needs more people like you who are so amazing at getting people to see things from your wonderful, enlightened perspective. Don't believe what those weirdos are saying. You're not a complete waste of space at all my man!

  30. If the spearfishing stopped.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It means they found one or more victims and probably already installed their malware. They wait until after the election to pick up the permanent staff who will stick around instead of the temps whose accounts will disappear. Later on they will walk someone out of the building.

  31. All insults and no evidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Its bullshit according to the anonymous coward. KK. Or maybe you are KKK?

    It's odd how you randomly dehumanize a stranger by associating them with an institution created by the Democrats in a case like this, no?

    > Just because you wish it wasn't true, doesn't make it untrue, just like your idiotic argument.

    Normally the person making the claims presents evidence. You gave lots of insults and no facts, instead of making a stronger post where you actually present facts that we can look at and explain why they're meaningful. Meanwhile, as the party who isn't making any claims, I just have to point out that you haven't actually presented anything whatsoever to refute you. I bet you think that's unfair, too. I'd compare this to Russel's teapot at this point, but you probably don't know what that is. You can google it if you want, though.

    > Facts probablly your brain I guess.

    You left out some words there. Liberalism really is a mental disorder, I guess. Hmmm, no wonder you're trying to reclassify them all the time so that people don't figure this out....

    1. Re: All insults and no evidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The person he replied to did the same thing. Where are his links? His citations, ohhhhh that's right he doesn't need any because he agrees with you. I see.repubtards at their finest.

  32. JEW PIG's media does it + why with proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Khazar Talmudic Jews believe this of all they call goyim/gentiles (any non-jew): Jews = biggest racists of all for which they "jew guilt" you for no less! They're hypocrites known as thieves all thru history or were Argentines in the 1940 under Peron, Spanish inquistion, France (1306), Egypt (despoiled/robbed by jews), Arabs (pre & post 1948), England (1330 Edward longshanks), Romans under titus, Russia pogroms and Germany who got rid of them from their nations nazi german's too? No. Driven into DESERTS ages ago! Don't wonder why after all those exilings above.

    Should anyone doubt any of this see Jacob Javits' crony Rosenthal spill the beans on it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4zMVZ8HnFI/ where he called all Christianity fools for helping Israel and the biggest scam of all time per their beliefs below from their Talmud.

    This is the province of the synagogue of Satan (Pharisees whom Jesus Christ himself kicked to the curb out of the temple & they killed him for it. Jeremiah did the same to them also + the Essenes could not stand them either breaking away from the pharisee corruption):

    Jew Talmud excerpts (the book that calls Christ's mother a whore & a bastard of a roman soldier):

    1. Sanhedrin 59a: "Murdering Goyim is like killing a wild animal."

    2. Abodah Zara 26b: "Even the best of the Gentiles should be killed."

    3. Sanhedrin 59a: "A goy (Gentile) who pries into The Law (Talmud) is guilty of death."

    4. Yebhamoth 11b: "Sexual intercourse with a little girl is permitted if she is three years of age."

    5. Schabouth Hag. 6d: "Jews may swear falsely by use of subterfuge wording."

    6. Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Do not save Goyim in danger of death."

    7. Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Show no mercy to the Goyim."

    8. Choschen Hamm 388, 15: "If it can be proven that someone has given the money of Israelites to the Goyim, a way must be found after prudent consideration to wipe him off the face of the earth."

    9. Choschen Hamm 266,1: "A Jew may keep anything he finds which belongs to the Akum (Gentile). For he who returns lost property (to Gentiles) sins against the Law by increasing the power of the transgressors of the Law. It is praiseworthy, however, to return lost property if it is done to honor the name of God, namely, if by so doing, Christians will praise the Jews and look upon them as honorable people."

    10. Szaaloth-Utszabot, The Book of Jore Dia 17: "A Jew should and must make a false oath when the Goyim asks if our books contain anything against them."

    11. Baba Necia 114, 6: "The Jews are human beings, but the nations of the world are not human beings but beasts."

    12. Simeon Haddarsen, fol. 56-D: "When the Messiah comes every Jew will have 2800 slaves."

    13. Nidrasch Talpioth, p. 225-L: "Jehovah created the non-Jew in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The non-Jew is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew day and night."

    14. Aboda Sarah 37a: "A Gentile girl who is three years old can be violated."

    15. Gad. Shas. 2:2: "A Jew may violate but not marry a non-Jewish girl."

    16. Tosefta. Aboda Zara B, 5: "If a goy kills a goy or a Jew, he is responsible; but if a Jew kills a goy, he is NOT responsible."

    17. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 388: "It is permitted to kill a Jewish denunciator everywhere. It is permitted to kill him even before he denounces."

    18. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348: "All property of other nations belongs to the Jewish nation, which, consequently, is entitled to seize upon it without any scruples."

    19. Tosefta, Abda Zara VIII, 5: "How to interpret the word 'robbery.' A goy is forbidden to steal, rob, or take women slaves, etc., from a goy or from a Jew. But a Jew is NOT forbidden to do all this to a goy."

    20. Seph. Jp., 92, 1: "God has given the Jews power over the possessions and blood of all nations."

    21. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen H

  33. Satanic JEWS + Christian Russia & why: Read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Khazar Talmudic Jews believe this of all they call goyim/gentiles (any non-jew): Jews = biggest racists of all for which they "jew guilt" you for no less! They're hypocrites known as thieves all thru history or were Argentines in the 1940 under Peron, Spanish inquistion, France (1306), Egypt (despoiled/robbed by jews), Arabs (pre & post 1948), England (1330 Edward longshanks), Romans under titus, Russia pogroms and Germany who got rid of them from their nations nazi german's too? No. Driven into DESERTS ages ago! Don't wonder why after all those exilings above.

    Should anyone doubt any of this see Jacob Javits' crony Rosenthal spill the beans on it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4zMVZ8HnFI/ where he called all Christianity fools for helping Israel and the biggest scam of all time per their beliefs below from their Talmud.

    This is the province of the synagogue of Satan (Pharisees whom Jesus Christ himself kicked to the curb out of the temple & they killed him for it. Jeremiah did the same to them also + the Essenes could not stand them either breaking away from the pharisee corruption):

    Jew Talmud excerpts (the book that calls Christ's mother a whore & a bastard of a roman soldier):

    1. Sanhedrin 59a: "Murdering Goyim is like killing a wild animal."

    2. Abodah Zara 26b: "Even the best of the Gentiles should be killed."

    3. Sanhedrin 59a: "A goy (Gentile) who pries into The Law (Talmud) is guilty of death."

    4. Yebhamoth 11b: "Sexual intercourse with a little girl is permitted if she is three years of age."

    5. Schabouth Hag. 6d: "Jews may swear falsely by use of subterfuge wording."

    6. Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Do not save Goyim in danger of death."

    7. Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Show no mercy to the Goyim."

    8. Choschen Hamm 388, 15: "If it can be proven that someone has given the money of Israelites to the Goyim, a way must be found after prudent consideration to wipe him off the face of the earth."

    9. Choschen Hamm 266,1: "A Jew may keep anything he finds which belongs to the Akum (Gentile). For he who returns lost property (to Gentiles) sins against the Law by increasing the power of the transgressors of the Law. It is praiseworthy, however, to return lost property if it is done to honor the name of God, namely, if by so doing, Christians will praise the Jews and look upon them as honorable people."

    10. Szaaloth-Utszabot, The Book of Jore Dia 17: "A Jew should and must make a false oath when the Goyim asks if our books contain anything against them."

    11. Baba Necia 114, 6: "The Jews are human beings, but the nations of the world are not human beings but beasts."

    12. Simeon Haddarsen, fol. 56-D: "When the Messiah comes every Jew will have 2800 slaves."

    13. Nidrasch Talpioth, p. 225-L: "Jehovah created the non-Jew in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The non-Jew is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew day and night."

    14. Aboda Sarah 37a: "A Gentile girl who is three years old can be violated."

    15. Gad. Shas. 2:2: "A Jew may violate but not marry a non-Jewish girl."

    16. Tosefta. Aboda Zara B, 5: "If a goy kills a goy or a Jew, he is responsible; but if a Jew kills a goy, he is NOT responsible."

    17. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 388: "It is permitted to kill a Jewish denunciator everywhere. It is permitted to kill him even before he denounces."

    18. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348: "All property of other nations belongs to the Jewish nation, which, consequently, is entitled to seize upon it without any scruples."

    19. Tosefta, Abda Zara VIII, 5: "How to interpret the word 'robbery.' A goy is forbidden to steal, rob, or take women slaves, etc., from a goy or from a Jew. But a Jew is NOT forbidden to do all this to a goy."

    20. Seph. Jp., 92, 1: "God has given the Jews power over the possessions and blood of all nations."

    21. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen H

  34. shill some more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You really should ask David Brock for a raise. You've been such an exceptional provocateur!

    1. Re:shill some more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell it to Mueller, tell it to the Warden, tell it to Satan when you see them, in that order. Trump is getting buried under the prison, traitor. Deal with it snowflake.

  35. Re:Blue Coder thinks he's in the FBI now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't you know? The DNC has its own troll factories, its own versions of the Internet Research Agency. Rest assured, our resident provocateur is gainfully employed.

  36. Re: We're still pushing this BS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not the same poster and not a Deep State believer, but keep in mind people like you made the same sorts of disparaging comments about alleged NSA spying activities. And in the end, the "nutjobs" actually underestimated what they had been up to.... and despite the Snowden leaks it has continued especially since the general public got bored of the idea.

  37. No evidence Russia did it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anything at this point.
    Have you looked at the evidence of Russia hacking the DNC in 2016? Its actually comical. The DNC REFUSED to let the FBI look at their servers and gave it to a company named Crowdstrike, a company that Clinton had hired to do other things for her. To this day they are the ONLY security people to have seen the DNC servers and they claimed there was evidence Russia hacked them.

    Since that time, they got caught lying about some Ukrainian servers claiming those were hacked by Russians. Yep, got caught lying about it.

    When it looked like they were going to testify before Congress about the DNC servers, they RETRACTED their Russian statements. Yep, the ONLY people on the planet with evidence of Russia hacking the DNC servers were unwilling to state so under oath. To this day they now say Russia did not hack the DNC servers.

    So now you have no evidence (Servers have been destroyed) and the only people who saw the evidence are unwilling to say under oath that Russia hacked the DNC servers. So no evidence, no witnesses, no experts.

    When charged with hacked by Muller, Putin offered to hand over his people that did it when he was shown the evidence to prove it. Muller declined and to this day Muller will not let anyone outside his "special council" see that evidence.

    Remember, of Muller's team of 19 people, 9 are known to have committed crimes while working on Muller's team (some fired for it), and this week we learned 4 of them know the entire thing was started with falsified evidence. So 13 of the 19 working for Muller have been proven corrupt, not a good sign.

    So, yes, at this point I would like to see SOME evidence. Until then I am making the statement "Russia DID NOT hack DNC servers." Prove me wrong or shut the fuck up.

  38. You know by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The problem with lying, and getting caught, is it tends to wreak havoc on your credibility.

    After the BS they pulled with Bernie / Hillary, they are naive ( or arrogant ) to believe that anyone will ever put any faith
    into any story they wish to tell. The doubt will be there again in 2020 when they nominate their next candidate and you
    can be sure Team Red* is going to make sure everyone and their brother remembers it.

    *Not that Team Red is the poster child of truthfulness, mind you, but they will surely throw some fuel on that fire.

    At what point will the people decide that the only way forward is to remove the cancer that is our entrenched elected leadership
    and start from scratch ? It seems the only ones who have been getting screwed over for the past several decades are us . . . . .

    It's a shame the US doesn't have the " No Confidence " rule to remove an incompetent / incapable government.

    1. Re:You know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with lying, and getting caught, is it tends to wreak havoc on your credibility.

      Not really.

      Just look at Trump.
      He has been a compulsive liar for over 50 years and there are still some 30% of the population who believes him.

  39. PDF attachment allow access to computer by najajomo · · Score: 1

    According to CNN, the emails in question appeared to have been sent from a State Department official and contained a PDF attachment that, if opened, would allow the hacker access to the recipient's computer.”

    Really, it's for such insightful technical analysis that keeps me coming back here. Would this PDF attachment run a script that hacked a Microsoft Windows computer? The rest of the story is merely the usual neocon waffle, part of the strategy to provoke the next cold war with Russia.

    1. Re:PDF attachment allow access to computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It could. By default I am showing Acrobat JavaScript being disabled in Reader 10.0 (haven't updated in a while) but in Edit, Preferences..., JavaScript category there are sections for JavaScript, JavaScript Security, and JavaScript debugger. Any of those enabled by default in a later version of Reader OR they enabled them because internally they use PDF forms or documents with Acrobat JavaScript?

  40. Tell it to Mueller, faggot traitor. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tell it to Mueller, tell it to the Warden, tell it to Satan when you see them, in that order. Trump is getting buried under the prison, traitor. Deal with it snowflake.

  41. No actual evidence for the so-called DNC hack by najajomo · · Score: 4, Informative

    Former NSA experts say it wasn’t a hack at all, but a leak — an inside job by someone with access to the DNC’s system.

    ‘ To this day, however, the intelligence agencies that released this assessment have failed to provide the American people with any actual evidence substantiating their claims about how the DNC material was obtained or by whom. Astonishingly and often overlooked, the authors of the declassified ICA themselves admit that their “judgments are not intended to imply that we have proof that shows something to be a fact.” ’

    1. Re:No actual evidence for the so-called DNC hack by quantaman · · Score: 1

      Former NSA experts say it wasn’t a hack at all, but a leak — an inside job by someone with access to the DNC’s system.

      ‘ To this day, however, the intelligence agencies that released this assessment have failed to provide the American people with any actual evidence substantiating their claims about how the DNC material was obtained or by whom. Astonishingly and often overlooked, the authors of the declassified ICA themselves admit that their “judgments are not intended to imply that we have proof that shows something to be a fact.” ’

      Seriously?

      That article is preceded by a giant editorial essay basically saying:

      "Hey! We only published this thing because we think it's important to ask more questions about the topic! Oh, and it turns out the article author actually misrepresented parts of the report, and the group that released the report actually had a lot reservations about publishing it!!"

      The evidence that it was a Russian hack continues to be pretty overwhelming.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    2. Re:No actual evidence for the so-called DNC hack by jbn-o · · Score: 1

      Bill Binney's group seems convinced the other way and makes a compelling case that the DNC's network connection wasn't fast enough for the data transfer to have been sent from the DNC to someone in Russia over the Internet. You cite no evidence to support your conclusion. You repeated a summary we're supposed to take for granted (given the repetition in corporate-friendly media) where every Russiagate story turns out to be completely untrue (such as Russians allegedly compromised the American power network via a power station in Vermont) or wildly overstated (such as trying to get us worked up over Russians buying social media ads totaling thousands of dollars). And all in service of what--covering for Hillary Clinton losing a rigged election to another political novice (I doubt many people in Illinois knew who Barack Obama was when he was that state's junior senator). Neoliberalism (a greater distance between rich and poor) and neoconservatism (more war) do a far better job of explaining why Mrs. Clinton couldn't convince enough voters in enough states with enough electoral votes to support her campaign than any Russians-did-it conspiracy theory. Candidate Trump (as opposed to President Trump) spoke against those values quite well (objecting to the 2003 invasion of Iraq, NAFTA, TPP, and mentioning Medicare for All once on "60 Minutes"). He didn't support much of that as president (he has ramped up war beyond Obama's ramp ups, signed trade deals that reintroduce anti-worker/anti-environmental policy, left US healthcare to the HMOs) but voters couldn't have known that for certain when they cast their vote. Comparing political records and what was said during campaigning it's no surprise some people (those who aren't elites, for example) wanted to give Trump their vote even if only to prevent Clinton from taking office.

    3. Re:No actual evidence for the so-called DNC hack by quantaman · · Score: 1

      Bill Binney's group seems convinced the other way

      And virtually everybody in the US intelligence apparatus disagrees with him.

      makes a compelling case that the DNC's network connection wasn't fast enough for the data transfer to have been sent from the DNC to someone in Russia over the Internet

      No they don't, they're morons.

      The metadata showing a 22.5 Mb/s transfer rate doesn't prove the files were downloaded from the DNC using a USB stick, it proves they were likely downloaded to (or from) a USB stick at some point.

      And if I were a remotely competent hacker I'd be doing the same thing I do when connecting to a customer installation. Working from a computer on an airgapped Network.

      And how do you move files back and forth from an airgapped Network?

      You use a USB.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    4. Re:No actual evidence for the so-called DNC hack by jbn-o · · Score: 1

      And virtually everybody in the US intelligence apparatus disagrees with him.

      The only statement we have which tries to make the opinion (an "assessment") from the Obama administration which I can't find anyone who seriously believes; nobody believes all of those agencies agree on anything much less that opinion. Sy Hersh says as much when he talked about that assessment and the media's lacking coverage of it ("What does an assessment mean? It's not a national intelligence estimate. If you had a real estimate you would have five or six dissents, people saying, 'cause I can tell you right now. One time they said 17 agencies all agreed. Oh really? The Coast Guard and the Air Force, they all agreed on it? And it was outrageous and nobody did that story."). Even the ostensible source of Russiagate stories—alleged collusion between some Russians and the Trump campaign—isn't looking so rosy for proponents anymore (it never looked relevant for the American public; Russiagate doesn't address the public's concerns it only reflects elite's interests). As the title indicates, "Mueller report PSA: Prepare for disappointment." and one report concurs. And this kind of downplaying has been done before. To think this is all being done in service of a neoliberalist losing a rigged election in search of an excuse to distract us from her culpability, what those leaked emails actually said, and possibly manufacture lies that could help foment a future war with Russia.

      No they don't, they're morons.

      Sources and evidence, not namecalling, are required to sustain convincing arguments.

    5. Re:No actual evidence for the so-called DNC hack by quantaman · · Score: 1

      The only statement we have which tries to make the opinion (an "assessment") from the Obama administration which I can't find anyone who seriously believes;

      Then pull your head out of the Fox News/Infowars bubble. The only people who "don't believe" the assessment are the people who worry that significant Russian interference delegitimizes Trump's presidency (which it kinda does).

      Even the ostensible source of Russiagate stories—alleged collusion between some Russians and the Trump campaign—isn't looking so rosy for proponents anymore

      LOL

      Sources and evidence, not namecalling, are required to sustain convincing arguments.

      The evidence that they're morons is they presented the timestamps as proof, apparently not realizing a USB transfer likely came AFTER the remote download.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    6. Re:No actual evidence for the so-called DNC hack by jbn-o · · Score: 1

      "likely came AFTER" comes with no evidence to justify the assertion of likelihood. Again. And this evidenceless assertion as we get yet another Russiagate "bombshell" from anonymous sources (this time with Robert Mueller, Russiagate-supporter's hero, saying it's not so). In the end the DNC emails still strike me as a relatively minor detail overshadowed by the importance of what those emails said. In other words, the DNC emails continue to be consistent with someone on the inside leaking them, but regardless of how they got out what they say is far more important and not at all helpful to make the Clinton campaign or DNC corporation look like organizations worth supporting (but if you want collusion, there it was). Another year of things not looking good for Russiagate as Jimmy Dore and Aaron Maté discuss.

    7. Re:No actual evidence for the so-called DNC hack by quantaman · · Score: 1

      "likely came AFTER" comes with no evidence to justify the assertion of likelihood. Again.

      So? There's a ton of other evidence suggesting Russia hacked the DNC emails. The major piece of counter-evidence is the USB transfer which is meaningless.

      And this evidenceless assertion as we get yet another Russiagate "bombshell" from anonymous sources (this time with Robert Mueller, Russiagate-supporter's hero, saying it's not so).

      Yeah, it sounds like the reporter somehow got it wrong. And unlike the Fox News / Infowars alternate reality when Mueller says something it's probably accurate, and when the MSM realizes the story is probably wrong they drop it.

      --
      I stole this Sig
  42. Anonymous Pansy cries RUSSIA! fromParent'sBasement by WheatGrass · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure who I'm more disgusted with, the anonymous pansy who shared this nonsense or SlashDot for keeping the Russophobia ball going to the detriment of U.S. credibility. I'll tell you this though, I wish Microsoft and Amazon's attempts at penetrating my network were as infrequently as those of the Russians. My log files tell me who my enemies are and Russia is NOT one of them.

  43. Re:We're still pushing this BS? by quantaman · · Score: 3, Informative

    The president's party always loses seats in the midterms. It was true for Obama as well. The "blue wave" was expected to be overwhelming, and it ... just didn't happen. We got a relatively normal midterm. Attempts to hype it up as something earthshattering are just false - turnout was slightly higher than expected, but still lower than presidential election years. You saw about an average swing. Sorry, the "blue wave" was just a normal blue trickle, and it'll almost certainly be entirely reversed in 2020, especially if Trump can remind voters of the record shutdown the Democrats caused the instant they had even a whiff of power.

    Democrats won the generic ballot by 8.6%, compared to the "red wave" of 2010 where the GOP only won by 6.8%.

    The reason the GOP had a 59 seat advantage with +6.8% of the vote while Democrats only had a 36 seat advantage with +8.6% is the GOP gerrymandered the hell out of the US in 2012, which is actually a pretty idiotic thing to do.

    The point of winning is to enact your polities, and unless your policies include widespread civil unrest then undercutting the legitimacy of the government is not the thing you want to do.

    --
    I stole this Sig
  44. non-story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every major power country try to hack other countries during elections. I'm sure even we do it.

  45. And they were blocked by wyattstorch516 · · Score: 1

    Amazing how much more secure the firewall is when you stop using the default administrator password.

  46. Re:We're still pushing this BS? by melted · · Score: 1

    House was expected, happens every time. Senate, on the other hand, was critical, given that Ruth Bader Ginsburg is about to kick the bucket. Only the Senate is needed to confirm her replacement.

  47. Re:Anonymous Pansy cries RUSSIA! fromParent'sBasem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US? Credibility? LMAO, that disappeared when they elected Trump, now just an international laughing stock, an overrated 3rd world shithole.

  48. Re:We're still pushing this BS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What bullshit! Stop getting news from fake sources. Nothing that uou said is remotely true.

  49. Re:We're still pushing this BS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL

    Trumpanzees are fucktarded.

    It was supported by both houses last December overwhelmingly, by both parties. Trump got scared of Ann Coulter and decided not to sign it and McConnell drop on his knees and sucked off Trumps microdick.

    The Democrat controlled house passed those bills again this month and Turtle refuses to bring it up in the Senate even though a veto-proof majority will vote for it.

    Trump said it was his shutdown and was proud to take credit and McConnell is keeping it going. Those are the only two people standing in the way of government reopening.

    numbnuts

  50. Re:We're still pushing this BS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You outed yourself. This is from 2018, not 2016. Oops...

  51. Re:We're still pushing this BS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just keep it closed permanently..

    There is too much bulls**t from both the republicans and democrats..

  52. Trump did better than Obama & Clinton midtermw by drnb · · Score: 1

    Yes, look at the numbers and compare apples to apples and oranges to oranges. Your "blue wall" theory is as garbage in 2018 as it was in 2016. Trump actually outperformed Presidents Obama and Clinton with respect to first midterm losses.

    In 2018, Trump's first midterm election, the Republicans lost 42 seats.
    In 2010, Obama's first midterm election, the Democrats lost 63 seats.
    In 1994, Clintons's first midterm election, the Democrats lost 54 seats.

    The fantasy of a "blue wall" is of great help to Trump. Is there some reason you perpetuate this myth?

  53. Re:Blue Coder thinks he's in the FBI now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's interesting to see that when leftists go homophobic it's all fine.. But if any rightwing forgets to use the preferred pronoun for someone then that person is called a nazi or facist...

  54. Shockingly bad security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know what kind of security the DNC is using now. But it's security in 2016 appeared to be abysmally bad. At one point, two or three of Bernie Sanders' aides were able to get through a firewall which apparently let them to be able to access rival candidate Hillary Clinton's polling data. The Sanders campaign had previously complained to the DNC about security concerns with the DNC's servers, and Bernie Sanders himself fired these aides after the attack. But it was shocking how lax the DNC was on security.

    What is beyond belief was how bad Hillary Clinton's campaign also was on security. Russians allegedly hacked Clinton campaign manager John Podesta's Gmail account in 2016. This happened after a Clinton aide responded to a phishing email giving the hackers Podesta's Gmail account login password.

    But even back in 2016, I was using two-factor authentication on my Gmail account and John Podesta was not! I am not famous and don't have emails that people would want. So why the hell was John Podesta using a Gmail account which was not secured with two-factor authentication? The bad tech practices of these people is unbelievably bad. Their bad judgment is what in part allowed Donald Trump to win.

    1. Re: Shockingly bad security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yawnnnnnnnnnn.

      A bunch of lies.

  55. Re:We're still pushing this BS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trump said it was his shutdown and was proud to take credit and McConnell is keeping it going. Those are the only two people standing in the way of government reopening.

    Totally false. Budget bills have to start in the House. The House has yet to pass a single bill reopening the government. Instead, Pelosi was going to waste tax payer money going on some bogus foreign trip without doing her job first.

    Trump and McConnell are ready to open the government immediately, but they quite literally can't do it until Pelosi does her damned job.

  56. Attention Snowflakes/Traitors! Whoops... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Worst part is you sound like a carbon copy of this moron, just mirrored (I quoted it for reference). Enough of this mad-libbed shit, already. I hope you get paid, because I can't see any other worth in your comments.

    What's surprising is that Republicans willfully support blatant treason and hacking groups because they truly consider them less adversarial to their perverse nazi authoritarian ideology than the rest of America. Rope is coming, traitors.

    Trump will hang for his crimes. You decide if you should hang next to that coward. This is apolitical, you support attacks on the US political process or either party, you are a traitor and should hang. Period.

  57. Party before Country by Martin+S. · · Score: 1

    Far too many are prepared to up play, down play, blame the victim for short term political advantage.

    When will people wise up and recognise that Putin is one of world's biggest threats to the freedom we enjoy in the west?

    1. Re:Party before Country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Video
      Obama "1980s are calling for their foreign policy back"

      Supporting shit like that removes your credibility. Congratulations on BEING the problem you claim you want to fix.

    2. Re: Party before Country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea because what was going on 9 years ago didn't change. You are a fucking idiot you know that? Things don't stay static. Love changes, and best friends become strangers. That's the saying. So Russia in 2008 isn't the Russia of 2019. Its dramatically different, and you know this.

      But keep being a blind partisan supporter and see how far that gets you. How's that wall working out? LOL

  58. Re:We're still pushing this BS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Totally false. Budget bills have to start in the House. The House has yet to pass a single bill reopening the government.

    This is blatant bullshit. The new House has in in fact passed a couple of different budget bills, the Reps even have a choice. The first is a copy of the bill that was already passed but Trump refused to sign. There are also bills that fund and open individual departments.

    Apart from that, the House has passed a number very reasonable bills to reform the election process and other important maintenance, and started a number of long overdue inquiries into government atrocities, corruption, and overreach, so any claim that the House and Pelosi are not doing their jobs is just propaganda bullshit.

  59. Re:We're still pushing this BS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is blatant bullshit. The new House has in in fact passed a couple of different budget bills,

    The "several different bills" should be your hint that it's all show. The Democrats are making a show of doing things in the House, but they have yet to pass a single bill that would actually reopen the government, and have so far refused to even talk with the President about it.

    Trying to bamboozle people by passing random bills that fund random parts of the government (but wouldn't really end the shutdown) is not at all the same thing as doing their damned job and writing a proper budget that would reopen the government and fund the wall the American people overwhelmingly support.

    But good job falling for the Democrats' little show.

  60. Re:We're still pushing this BS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fucking Trumpanzees are worse than the Orange Turd. Even more stupid and traitorous. Make America Great Again by moving to Russia.

    Those spending bills will reopen government and passed Congress.

    numbnuts

  61. Re: We're still pushing this BS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everything you said is a lie. I don't get it. Do you sleep good at night? How can you look facts straight in the eye and lie. I just don't get it.

  62. Re: Trump did better than Obama & Clinton midt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And yet he still can't get his baby monument off the ground.

    Fucking sad, when even your own party looks at you like a fucking monkey.

  63. Re: Blue Coder thinks he's in the FBI now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are creating these own enemies in your head. They do not exist faggot.

    I'm a leftist and I don't care if you call me a faggot. I'll call you a faggot right back.

  64. Re:We're still pushing this BS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    His "blue wave" comment was in reference to the 2016 presidential elections, not the 2018 midterms.

    The Democrats lost in 2016, get over it. Both parties will win and lose again in the future. This is how it works.

  65. Poor pitiful DNC? Fuck the DNC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And fuck the corrupt idiots that keep voting for them!

    They are more corrupt than Godamn Sachs!

    This is why we have "President Trump"!

    Sorry you got modded down...

  66. Narrative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Russian Hackers bad.
    DNC good.
    Orange man bad.