Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Debuts New Low-Cost Laptops and 'Classroom Pen' For Schools (geekwire.com)

Microsoft is doubling down on the education market, a competitive arena for the world's largest tech giants, with a series of new low-cost laptops and tools to help students and teachers work together. From a report: At the BETT education conference in London Tuesday, Microsoft unveiled seven new laptops and two-in-one tablets made by partners like Lenovo, Dell and Acer and a new Microsoft Classroom Pen designed for the smaller hands of kids. Starting at $189, the low-cost devices are designed to stand up to tough treatment of being dragged around in a backpack everyday. The seven new devices showcased today are: Lenovo 100e -- priced from $189, Lenovo 300e (2-in-1) -- priced from $289, Lenovo 14w -- priced from $299, Acer TravelMate B1(B118-M) -- priced from $215, Acer TravelMate Spin B1 (B118-R/RN) -- priced from $299, Acer TravelMate B1-114 -- priced from $319, and Dell Latitude 3300 for Education -- priced from $299. The pen is priced at $40.

90 comments

  1. But can it run Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The hardware looks nice, but I would like to opt-out from Microsoft indoctrination...

    Can I run Linux on these (or any of the BSDs for that matter, even MacOS-X would be better)? Otherwise, they're just baggage my kid doesn't need.

    1. Re: But can it run Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh this is great! I would also like to be able to submit my algebra homework via interpretive dance because I need an engineering degree but I cant add. How about that?

    2. Re:But can it run Linux? by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Hell, I'm wondering why shareholders are NOT kicking Tim Cook to the curb??

      Apple used to have a lock on the educational crowd years back.

      Apple used to have a lock on the artistic and creative types years back.

      Now?

      they seem to have their futures tied up believing everyone needs a brand new smart phone annually and will continue to buy new ones each time.

      They keep sinking money into Apple TV...something that really hasn't taken off, compared to others.

      They're forgetting one of the important things in the IT industry, GET THEM WHILE THEY"RE YOUNG!!

      Seems Apple is just riding the fading energy engine that was left in motion by Jobs upon his passing.

      They have a BIG pile of money they are sitting on, sure....but at some point, without new ideas, and keeping folks in your ecosystem (a great way is to raise kids using your OS and products)....at some point, that big pile of money won't matter and it will start vanishing too trying to keep above water at some point.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    3. Re:But can it run Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "GET THEM WHILE THEY"RE YOUNG!!"

      Soooo, Apple should focus on smartphones then?

    4. Re:But can it run Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hell, I'm wondering why shareholders are NOT kicking Tim Cook to the curb??

      Apple used to have a lock on the educational crowd years back.

      Apple used to have a lock on the artistic and creative types years back.

      Now?

      they seem to have their futures tied up believing everyone needs a brand new smart phone annually and will continue to buy new ones each time.

      They keep sinking money into Apple TV...something that really hasn't taken off, compared to others.

      They're forgetting one of the important things in the IT industry, GET THEM WHILE THEY"RE YOUNG!!

      Seems Apple is just riding the fading energy engine that was left in motion by Jobs upon his passing.

      They have a BIG pile of money they are sitting on, sure....but at some point, without new ideas, and keeping folks in your ecosystem (a great way is to raise kids using your OS and products)....at some point, that big pile of money won't matter and it will start vanishing too trying to keep above water at some point.

      Raise your hand if you really think any of these products will survive an entire school year.

      There is a real lower-limit for a product's price, below which something's just gotta "give". And that "something"(s) are going to be hardware specs and reliability.

      Mark my words: There will be a 50% minimum failure rate for these machines, with probably 15% never making it out of the box in working order.

      I understand the sentiment behind "Get 'em while they're young"; but the days of school districts paying $1100 a pop for Apple ][ systems are long past. Now, the stupid-ass bean-counters on the school boards get a PowerPoint presentation on the joys of Windows 10 and a Free Lunch, and they're all ready to sign-off on pallet-loads of these pieces of unmitigated shit.

      Again and again. They never seem to learn.

    5. Re:But can it run Linux? by TomBauserman · · Score: 3, Informative

      Our school district is 1 to 1 chromebooks for about 1200 students. We pay about $200 ea. Over a year we have about a 10% failure rate. But we're also an authorized warranty repair center. So we make money on repairs. Yes they run linux. You can either install ubuntu/fedora or run linux apps directly on them now.

    6. Re:But can it run Linux? by pgmrdlm · · Score: 2

      They also use to have a lock on graphic work didn't they? I thought that was due to the hardware being better for graphics. But then, I thought that changed when they went with generic PC chip sets. This is not a statement, this is a question.

      --
      Anonymous comments are as pathetic as the anonymous "sources" that contaminate gutless journalism from the New York Time
    7. Re:But can it run Linux? by bensafrickingenius · · Score: 2

      Wrong. I buy Chromebooks for $176 each. I have a cart that's 5 years old and still going strong. We have hundreds and hundreds of them. Best to know what you're talking about before, you know, *talking* about it.

      --
      I am not left-handed, either!
    8. Re:But can it run Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      We have about 10,000 of them in the district I work for. We pay over $400 for a Lenovo model with 360 degree hinge and touchscreen. They are some of the worst pieces of junk I've ever had the displeasure of working on. We've had quite a few issues with them (bad batteries, bad power switches, bad keyboards, etc..). I guess they are okay for people that want a very dumbed down computing experience.

    9. Re:But can it run Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They also use to have a lock on graphic work didn't they? I thought that was due to the hardware being better for graphics. But then, I thought that changed when they went with generic PC chip sets. This is not a statement, this is a question.

      Wrong.

      In fact, as any Amiga fan worth his salt will tell you, Macs actually had (for the most part) INFERIOR graphics to some other systems. And before Macs went PCI, finding hardware accelerated graphics boards was pretty damned difficult/REALLY expensive.

      Apple was more popular for Graphics because they truly invented Desktop Publishing, and so software companies flocked to the platform with their Illustration, Drawing, Retouching, Publishing, and Web Design Applications. Therefore, for a long while (for about a decade at least), about the only way to get a decent end-to-end solution for graphical/publishing was to buy a Mac.

      Then the Software publishers heard the siren call of Marketshare, hired some Windows Devs., and one by one shifted their focus to Windows first, Mac second. Some even left the Mac platform entirely (although most did not, even to this day).

    10. Re: But can it run Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Something of a surprise to this consumer was being told by the repairer "don't use your laptop on your lap, it's not designed for that".

      My Lenovo touchscreen has a fault where the screen image pixelates and freezes the OS when two components within the device touch. It's like a short circuit. But the shell is so flimsy that any handling causes the laptop to distort from perfectly flat, and without perfect flatness on the screen or on the base, the bad contact happens. Even rethreading the wiring loom as it passes through the connecting hinge has failed to fix it.

      Moral: you can't change the laws of physics. Slimline is double plus ungood. Here's a use case: Only buy a laptop if the case stays rigid when you pick it up by one hand at any corner and hold it level.

      It used to be this way, once upon a time.

      So: durable laptops? Even if it's back to the future, bring it on!

    11. Re:But can it run Linux? by chuckugly · · Score: 2

      Way way back when the dinosaurs roamed the Mac had a reasonably decent looking bitmapped display, and this allowed WYSIWYG workflow for desktop publishing, when combined with a little laser printer magic and a lot of software. They held onto this head start for a surprisingly long time after those initial conditions were common on other platforms as well. But the display that got them the lead wasn't anything that generic chipsets of today are envious of. I forget exactly but it was pretty small and grayscale initially ....

    12. Re:But can it run Linux? by sensei+moreh · · Score: 2

      The first univrsity I worked for bought me a $10K Apple ][ system. 64K, 3 floppy drives, color and monochrome monitors, Z80 card, CP/M, Wordstar, dot matrix printer, daisy wheel printer, and a FORTRAN compiler for CP/M

      --
      Geology - it's not rocket science; it's rock science
    13. Re: But can it run Linux? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Toshiba built a laptop with a spinny hinge which is not garbage, the Lifebook T900. You can have combo multitouch+wacom or you can have wacom+daylight, but at the time you couldn't have multitouch+wacom+daylight which was sad. They are super thick by modern standards though, which is probably why they don't disintegrate. They also have a loud-ass fan which eventually warps and makes noise, and it's annoying to get in and replace it. It's less exciting in this era due to Intel Inside, though

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re:But can it run Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone who thinks Apple users are a cult has never dealt with Amiga users. They will tell you EVERYTHING today is inferior to what Amigas brought to the table in the mid-'80s.

    15. Re:But can it run Linux? by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Hell, I'm wondering why shareholders are NOT kicking Tim Cook to the curb?? Apple used to have a lock on the educational crowd years back. Apple used to have a lock on the artistic and creative types years back. Now?

      Now they're making tons of money on people with disposable cash buying nice-to-have items. They were doing okay, but Apple was never great at appealing to places with budgets like schools or companies. Sure, the marketing department used to get Macs but that was it. They absolutely don't want to compete with $200 Chromebooks. They're running the same Intel/AMD/nVidia chips as everyone else, maybe you prefer macOS but inside Photoshop it's the same. The "new Apple" begin with the iPod, where they learned cool gadgets have high margins because you're selling directly to individuals and they'll buy a $399 cool device over a $299 uncool device. The iPhone, iPad, Apple Watch are all good examples, the Apple TV never really took off because they never managed to brand the experience it's just another streaming box. I'm not really quite sure what gadget I'm missing, but I think Apple should build that one.

      The other huge prospect on the horizon is to finally put an A12X+ chip in an ARM-based laptop and challenge WinTel. Particularly if they could launch sometime in the next 12 months, like Win7 is going EOL so maybe now's a good time to jump ship. Though I admit that might just be wishful thinking on my part, but I think Apple has all the experience and ingredients. And all the advantages of starting in 2019, with only so much baggage from iOS/macOS that they want to carry but still solid amounts of code that could be ported with very little effort. And Intel is still mostly threading the water on 10nm...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    16. Re: But can it run Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty sure you meant Fujitsu, they produce the Lifebook series. I've got a T734, it's a solid machine.

    17. Re:But can it run Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [...] They're forgetting one of the important things in the IT industry, GET THEM WHILE THEY"RE YOUNG!! [...]

      They're forgetting one of the important things in the IT industry, GET THEM WHILE THEY"RE YOUNG AND BLACK!!

      There, FTFY.

      Disclaimer: This post written by a person of no-color.

    18. Re: But can it run Linux? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Yeah sorry I get them confused for some reason. The T900 has been hanging on through massive abuse, it's been dropped on the floor a ton of times

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  2. Re:Ask at school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always wish this "first hit is free" shit was true. You could just wander around from dealer to dealer getting free cocaine.

  3. Wasting people's time while making money! by bogaboga · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While there's been a number of articles touting the benefits of technology in the classroom, the disadvantages are immense and not worth the investment That's why, pupils from the so called 3rd world thrive when they come over to "technologically advanced" classroom environments. They demonstrate an understanding of the academics better.

    This leads me to one conclusion: Nothing beats the old fashioned [pen and paper] way of learning.

    Microsoft cannot agree with me on this. Heck, they want to sell more and more gadgets. They want to make money, and lots of it. I will point those who support technology to debunk this piece

    1. Re:Wasting people's time while making money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all programs, not all plans, not all applications, not all technological additions are equal or equally applicable to the classroom and children. Duh. But to imply no program/application/technology will be a net positive? Unproven on your part.

      I don't think anyone has a lot of grounded faith in Microsoft to get it right though.

    2. Re:Wasting people's time while making money! by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      Actually it is well documented. Technology in he classroom has proven to disrupt learning not enable it. The higher cognitive functioning technology was suppose to allow has not materialized. In fact the use of technology has shown students regress in simple tasks.

      Technology in schools was always about sales and never about education.

    3. Re:Wasting people's time while making money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually not all "technology" has been studied, sorry. "Technology in schools was always about sales and never about education." - As practiced by Microsoft, sure. Not all attempts are equal, equating them is moronic.

    4. Re: Wasting people's time while making money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, you're right in more ways than you realise. Handwriting trains fine motor skills, which are essential for cognitive development. Handwriting notes is more effective for learning than typing because handwriting is less efficient, thereby encouraging learners to summarise more, which requires deeper processing of subject matter. Reading in print, rather than on screen, is better for making inferences from texts, leading to better global comprehension. There's new research coming in all the time showing significant & substantial advantages to analogue media, e.g. pen & paper. I should know, I work in elearning.

    5. Re:Wasting people's time while making money! by Voyager529 · · Score: 2

      Actually it is well documented. Technology in he classroom has proven to disrupt learning not enable it. The higher cognitive functioning technology was suppose to allow has not materialized. In fact the use of technology has shown students regress in simple tasks.

      Technology in schools was always about sales and never about education.

      100% sincere request: I haven't read any studies that proved this either way, so if you have citations, I would be very interested in reading them.

      That being said, I don't think it was a matter of tech can alter brain chemistry, so much as the fact that there are things that can be demonstrated in an interactive environment. For example, allowing students to use drag-and-drop interfaces for math, or make things disappear to improve simplicity in visualization, or using colors to separate nouns and verbs in a sentence, or showing the Coriolis effect by showing the youtube video of two guys on the opposite side of the world draining swimming pools.

      The problem isn't that tech is useless, it's that people who buy stuff for schools seem to think it's possible to budget for a palette of laptops and a few access points and then kids are going to 'just learn it'. Teachers, who are already overworked, underpaid, and who have a wide gamut of experience ranging from "Office 2010 in high school" to "the old guard who used WordPerfect 5.1 in college" to "zomg I have an iPhone but I don't know how to work it, teehee", to "Yes, I actually know how to use this stuff, but I am disallowed to have admin credentials"...and the decision makers didn't budget for training or had the following plan for implementation:
      1. Acquire Chromebooks.
      2. Tell teachers to teach students to use Chromebooks.
      3. ???
      4. Tell parents that they are teaching technology in the classroom.
      5. Profit?

      This ends up with royally inconsistent results that lean toward the lowest common denominator of "kids can log in and use the obvious parts of Google Docs". Sometimes it's a bit better, and sometimes it's a bit worse. I remember reading a Slashdot comment a few years back of a school that did a 1:1 iPad rollout, and the kids had to take spelling tests on it, but the app they used didn't disable autocorrect.

      Because of this wild inconsistency and so many people involved, it's not that classroom tech can't be done well, but it's very rare to have the desire to do so in every step from the superintendent on down to ensure that proper training and support structures are available in order to make it the case.

      tl;dr: When tech in the classroom is done properly, it can indeed be an asset. However, that ideal has so many points of failure that it is incredibly rare to not have those initiatives backfire in some way, some more spectacularly than others.

    6. Re: Wasting people's time while making money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Long ago, I bought a copy of Photoshop. It did not make me an artist. I also bought a book on how to draw stuff. It sat, unread, on a shelf, and also did not make me an artist.

      It is almost as if the tools are less important than the willingness to practice.

      FWIW, the book was cheaper.

  4. Re:Ask at school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'll shoot your nose off kid.

  5. Performance of these laptops? by mykepredko · · Score: 1

    For our business, I've had to test out low-end Win10 machines to work with our software. I've been generally surprised at how sluggish these laptops (2-4GB DDR and 32-64GByte SSD) come up as well as bring up and run applications. Will these computers offer better performance or do you really need a system with a 2+GHz clock and more than 5GB of DDR?

    1. Re:Performance of these laptops? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Not sure about the Windows ones, but I bought a chromebook with 4GB RAM for my kid similar to these low end laptops and I was quite impressed with the speed and functionality.

      I think that if they put an actual SSD in these machine as opposed to EMMC (SSDs are ridiculously cheap now), and 4 GB of RAM, then these machine should run pretty well. Most tasks don't require high end CPUs. I have a 10 year old machine with 4GB ram and I put an SSD in there and it just flies for basic tasks

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re:Performance of these laptops? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These look like low end generic Chinese win 10 tablet / notebook, just badged by the big boys with a MicroSoft stamp of approval for the US markert. I have used a number of them and even with the latest silicon from Intel, they are sluggish. But a lot of school boards / administrators will be wined and dined by MicroSoft and yet more lousy technology will be foisted on our long suffering students.

    3. Re:Performance of these laptops? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, Lenovo 100e has 4GB RAM - LPDDR4!
      The 32GB eMMC might be bad enough to slow it down because Windows 10 or its "modern" software is so I/O intensive. I think it will be shit. But if you run Windows "Education" (a rebrand of Enterprise?) and GPOs to disable useless RAM-wasting, I/O wasting services like "Superfetch" or even disable the whole "store" maybe it will be usable.

      I think the CPU is great, quad core 14nm Atom Celeron that throttles between 1.1 and 2.4GHz. For over 20 years, crippled computers have always suffered RAM starvation and saturated I/O.
      e.g. the Windows 10 calculator is an "app" so it uses like 50MB RAM and on hard disk drive it may take like 10 seconds to launch (if the lying task manager says your RAM usage is "90%" out of 4GB and the "windows app" runtime was swapped out to disk, at least). This is with a very fast CPU, e.g. Intel 7200U.
      Now, what if the Atom Celeron had 8GB LPDDR4 and PCIe 2x NVMe 128GB storage? It would probably launch that crap much faster, less than a second.

    4. Re: Performance of these laptops? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a few low-spec Win10 laptops and tablets and, it's true, out of the box they are sluggish. But if you tune them they are quite reasonable. I even have a 2GB win10 tablet that I even run virtual machines on just for quick coding jobs.

      Just get clever with disabling a lot of useless services (Win10 garbage) and any OEM vendor add ons. And especially all the auto-updating start menu apps for news, games, etc.

      With stock config it maybe takes up to 3 minutes from a cold start before these low end Win10 machines are really useable but if you quickly tune it like I do you can get it down to 6 seconds from full cold start to fully usable (I say full cold start because technically windows never fully shuts down anymore which is one of the first BS things I disable).

    5. Re:Performance of these laptops? by kenh · · Score: 1

      Microsoft will not wine and dine administrators, Microsoft doesn't sell these devices, except possibly in their Microsoft Retail store.

      --
      Ken
    6. Re:Performance of these laptops? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Yes, they are slow. I bought my daughter a low-end Lenovo with only 32GBytes of flash for a "disk", and had severe problems because the latest Windows 10 Update requires 10GBytes of disk space. Had to plug in a USB drive, still only succeeded after 3 tries and doing massive cleanup of the disk.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    7. Re:Performance of these laptops? by chuckugly · · Score: 1

      I suspect they ship in S mode anyway.

    8. Re:Performance of these laptops? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      A quality EMMC is good enough for daily use. In fact, for everyday use I could get away with a good uSD card — we expect the random write performance to vary widely and it does, but we might not expect how much the random read performance varies. I found Samsung Evo+ to have the best, which jibes with what the above link says. I came upon that information via the Pine64 forums originally, though, not through the raspi community. Supposedly the 16GB (or was it 8GB?) and above models of both the Evo and Evo+ are different from the smaller ones, and have much higher rates.

      The big thing they need is RAM. Everyone is wasting boatloads of RAM left and right and you need as much of it as possible. I consider it painful to use a PC with less than 8GB, and of late I've been wishing I had 32GB (I have 16GB in my primary system, 8GB in my backup...)

      If the SoC has the PCIE lanes to spare, I'm all for putting a M.2 NVMe module in, but I'd really rather have a super cheap laptop. I just want upgradable RAM, to at least 8GB.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:Performance of these laptops? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Well, how much are they charging for windows on that platform. I thought that sort of price double dealing, free in one market, pay everywhere else was illegal, a monopolistic action designed to drive out competition and once lock in achieved, well the OS goes back to costing more than the hardware and no other software yet. Does this not subject them to an anti-trust suit, should they fail to make their OS available at similar prices in other markets. Keep in mind, they also take out the invasion of privacy, only because it would be illegal and their lobbyists have not made it legal and preferably compulsory. Unfortunately the major competitor Google is even worse.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  6. Microsoft in Schools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm a teacher, I've taught at several school. Bay Area schools are transitioning from having computers available, to all students being issued one of these cheaper laptops. The hardware is basically irrelevant for students. Literally the only thing students do on their computers is open a web browser, either for Google Office or for Google Classroom. Or to try to get away with gaming LOL. There is functionally no difference between Chromebooks and Windows.

    Admins say the Google and Microsoft tools are fine (but that Mac admin is a pain in the butt). Microsoft has a hassle with frequent updates. If the students don't leave their computers on and plugged in over the weekend, they may have to run updates in the middle of class. However, that is a pretty rare thing, and hopefully just takes a minute or two. It's a pain, but it isn't poisonous.

    A lot of the schools I've seen run Macs for yearbook or maybe a computer art class, and students may be issued Macbooks instead of cheap laptops. Annoying, because student-monitoring tools (whitelists/blacklists/etc.) don't work on the Macs. But of course, students doing high-end electives tend to be higher-end students who don't need re-direction to get them to stay off Fortnite.

    1. Re:Microsoft in Schools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a teacher, I've taught at several school. Bay Area schools are transitioning from having computers available, to all students being issued one of these cheaper laptops. The hardware is basically irrelevant for students. Literally the only thing students do on their computers is open a web browser, either for Google Office or for Google Classroom. Or to try to get away with gaming LOL. There is functionally no difference between Chromebooks and Windows.

      Admins say the Google and Microsoft tools are fine (but that Mac admin is a pain in the butt). Microsoft has a hassle with frequent updates. If the students don't leave their computers on and plugged in over the weekend, they may have to run updates in the middle of class. However, that is a pretty rare thing, and hopefully just takes a minute or two. It's a pain, but it isn't poisonous.

      A lot of the schools I've seen run Macs for yearbook or maybe a computer art class, and students may be issued Macbooks instead of cheap laptops. Annoying, because student-monitoring tools (whitelists/blacklists/etc.) don't work on the Macs. But of course, students doing high-end electives tend to be higher-end students who don't need re-direction to get them to stay off Fortnite.

      IT departments that think that Macs are hard to deploy, admin, or keep updated (and locked-down) are nothing more than lazy Windows-Centric weenies who simply don't know what tools and techniques are available and useful for macOS.

      https://www.apple.com/remotedesktop/features.html

      https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT205054

      There is a wealth of information under this sub-site. Dig around!

      https://www.apple.com/education/

    2. Re:Microsoft in Schools by DarkRookie2 · · Score: 1

      There is a big difference.
      One is a souped up web browser and the other a piss poor OS

      Hmm. Maybe they are not so different.

      --
      http://progressquest.com/spoltog.php?name=Son+Of+Son+Of+DarkRookie
    3. Re:Microsoft in Schools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell is Fortnight?

      Obviously you do not mean the standard meaning, which is "two weeks".

      Also, all laptops stand up to being dragged around in backpacks all day every day. That is the purpose of a laptop. However, for $200 I would not even expect it to be able to be removed from the shipping package without falling to bits.

    4. Re:Microsoft in Schools by spacepimp · · Score: 1

      The cost savings come from reducing support costs to effectively zero. (chromebooks) By not paying for more, better educated support techs to help with administrating the Apple machines they are saving money and staff and time.

    5. Re:Microsoft in Schools by kenh · · Score: 1

      Managing Chromebooks is "effectively zero" (effort? cost?) - so when a school district rolls out 1,200 chromebooks they simply manage themselves? They repair themselves?

      I think not.

      I suspect you think because your personal chromebook is zero maintenece, you imagine 1,200 would be just as easy to manage.

      --
      Ken
    6. Re:Microsoft in Schools by spacepimp · · Score: 1

      I don't own a Chromebook as I don't have a use case for one. I have however consulted for educational software/technology companies. You can do your own TCO analysis without being a pedant. It effectively reduces suport costs and TCO by 61-71% over a three year life-cycle.
      I based my comment off of the direct feedback from those who administrate and use Chromebooks in their school/teaching districts, as well as direct conversation with VAR's in the field.

    7. Re:Microsoft in Schools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cost savings come from reducing support costs to effectively zero. (chromebooks) By not paying for more, better educated support techs to help with administrating the Apple machines they are saving money and staff and time.

      You obviously attended the Seminar!

      Idiot.

    8. Re:Microsoft in Schools by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      > What the hell is Fortnight?

      NOT Fortnight, but Fortnite. The parent spelt it correctly.

      It's the latest fad in gaming. I've discussed it before.

      Are you new to /. because there have been a few stories about it?

      * Fortnite Hits 8.3 Million (Or 0.1% of Human Population) Concurrent Players
      * Fortnite Was 2018's Most Important Social Network

  7. Amazon needs a desktop OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since the DOJ failed to breakup Microsoft despite its continuing abuses of the market, it would be great for a company like Amazon to take them on head on. I can see a subscription service that includes laptops bundled with LibreOffice in the classroom or company cubicles, and cloud servers.

    1. Re:Amazon needs a desktop OS by DarkRookie2 · · Score: 1

      So it can be a shitty Ubuntu clone?
      Didn't do so great with Android.

      --
      http://progressquest.com/spoltog.php?name=Son+Of+Son+Of+DarkRookie
    2. Re:Amazon needs a desktop OS by leonbev · · Score: 1

      That honestly wouldn't be a big leap for them, as they already have their own Red Hat Linux clone called Amazon Linux for AWS server instances. They even have a GUI front-end for it that you can use with Amazon WorkSpaces instead of Windows.

  8. Chromebooks are different beasts by mykepredko · · Score: 1

    Personally, I am quite impressed by how Chromebooks operate (not so pleased with Google's treatment of user data) but not so much when you get the same (literally) hardware running Win10 - I compared an Acer Chromebook with Win10 machine with identical specs, processors, etc. They were the same machine except the covers are different colours.

    There seems to be a lot of bloat that keeps the Windows Machines from running at what I would consider a decent speed which is why I asked the question to see if there are any plans on improving the performance of these machines.

    1. Re:Chromebooks are different beasts by TomBauserman · · Score: 1

      It's because chromebooks are dumb terminals. As bandwidth becomes ever more available we're going backwards. Nothing actually runs on the chromebook except a browser. Everything is in the "cloud".

    2. Re:Chromebooks are different beasts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are correct. The chromebook experience is a very simplistic experience. I'm not a big fan of running everything
      in a browser, some things just demand more. I've had people bring me a chromebook that runs like shit and lo and behold
      they have a hundred different extensions loaded into their browser. Chromebooks are okay for very simple tasks, but I don't
      see how they can replace a computer running linux (or even windows).

    3. Re:Chromebooks are different beasts by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I wonder how much of this is due to slow I/O. I've noticed that machines that would have been fine 5 years ago are terribly slow because they don't have an SSD. As soon as you put in an actually SSD, many of the performance problems seem to disappear. I think they've completely stopped optimizing their operating system for anything that doesn't have an SSD.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    4. Re:Chromebooks are different beasts by mykepredko · · Score: 1

      The Acer systems that I was testing were identical, 2GB DDR, 32GB SSD, Celerons.

    5. Re: Chromebooks are different beasts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Acer doesn't sell laptops with 32gb real ssds. Perhaps it was an emc model, which is a tenth to a hundredth of the speed of an actual sata/nvme ssd.

  9. This is absolutely disgusting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Big-brand megacorps should have no access to children. We already know their agenda:

        1) study the children's data and behavior (and keep it forever)
        2) use what they learn to reduce market options and funnel more money to themselves

    If schools are *so* desperate for technology, companies that want to win these contracts should be forced to erase all traces of branding from these devices. There should be no way to tell whether it was provided by MS or GOOGLE or AMAZON. The school should not be a goddamn billboard for these trashbag companies. Isn't it obvious they are not doing this out of genuine philanthropy? Why don't they provide free devices to the elderly? Or just anyone that needs one? This is standard playbook wolf-in-sheeps-clothing.

  10. Underpowered by DarkRookie2 · · Score: 1

    I don't see how you would use these things.
    You will get one tab opened, and that will be it.

    Maybe M$ just wants kids in their systems sooner and sooner.

    --
    http://progressquest.com/spoltog.php?name=Son+Of+Son+Of+DarkRookie
    1. Re:Underpowered by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      I know, right? Watching porn would really suck on these toy computers!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  11. Laptops are free, like printers by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
    Printers and laptops are free. You just pay for ink and the back end server.

    Hundreds of students using Win10 devices, managed by some Active Directory server in the back end? Cost of sys admin, cost of server, cost of server security upgrades .... No wonder they are giving crap machines for free.

    Win10 plays poorly on low end machines. I bought a cheap win10 for exclusive use as VPN work from home machine. That dog could not even manage that simple thing well. Amount of disk thrashing it does, ... 8 GB not enough to maintain a VPN connection and render the pixmap coming over the net? Utter crap. I disabled something called user experience telemetry. That stopped the disk thrashing, but speed is no better.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Laptops are free, like printers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Managing Active Directory is a problem? Why not.
      Hence, there is Active Directory on Azure and you don't need your own server.

      Consumers even have had it for years sort of - when they are fleeced by Windows dialogs and use an online account to log in to their desktop session. (but if everyhing they do need Onedrive and Skype, maybe that's ok for them)

      PS : just kill Superfetch and "Windows Search" as well. This crap's job is to thrash the disk randomly and for long periods of time for no benefit. Also Classic Shell is useful, if only to avoid disk thrashing when accidentally opening the start menu. Now I'm only missing the calc.exe from Windows XP (calculator is the only "Modern App" you may be forced to use). XnView or IrFanView if you want to browse pictures like it's 2003 and your software loads them instantly.

      If your VPN and thin client are bad I wonder if that's shitty software or you have a driver problem.. or e.g. it doesn't use your CPU crypto hardware acceleration. afaik Intel stopped disabling the crypto hardware even on lowest end CPU. Or anyway, whatever the reason is. Pixmaps coming over the net and performance is shit? Isn't this unusual when it works well.

  12. These aren't new by KalvinB · · Score: 1

    This just the same old same old. You have been able to pick up $200 laptops for years.

    The problem is that they are practically unusable as they are very sluggish and have no space for anything.

    They're just intended to be terminals limited to a walled-garden internet.

    Schools would be far better off doing what they used to do which was has a computer lab and dedicated computer time on actual computers. Instead of trying to give every kid their own worthless device because that's all the school can afford.

    One of the fundamental issues is families who don't recognize the importance of having a computer in the home since they can "use the internet on their phone."

    It wasn't that long ago that families understood the importance of computers and made the effort to have one even if everyone had to share.

    Bring back budget desktop PCs for the family room. That would be useful.

    1. Re:These aren't new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree. These laptops run Google Office just fine. They watch youtube videos full screen without skipping. Really for what these students do they're 100% functional, although 3 year old laptops are showing their age.

      For yearbook and art classes, students use higher-powered Macs. For normal student use, the requirements are really low, and these laptops work fine.

  13. Will a Sharpie work? by ClarkMills · · Score: 1

    Well it will at least once...

  14. Awesome! by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 1

    I hated that the industry got rid of netbooks. Let the cheap, small laptops return!

    1. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cheap, small laptops have never gone away, they're just not as strongly promoted as before. There have been a number of $200, 2GB/32GB 11.6" and 14" laptops available on a continuing basis over the last 4 years or so, both as Chromebooks and as Windows machines. They just are not very good...

    2. Re:Awesome! by sensei+moreh · · Score: 1

      I've got an HP Stream 14. Celeron N4000, 4GB RAM, 32 GB eMMC. $219 at Wally World, Much nicer than my old Acer Aspire One ZG5 with an Atom N270, 1GB RAM, 120 GB HDD, which was $400 at Microcenter back in the day. Both run Linux

      --
      Geology - it's not rocket science; it's rock science
    3. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mate desktop on 1366x768 also works extremely well and solves the problem of waste of RAM, CPU and graphics resources. (Mate or XFCE, or maybe KDE, or LXDE and LXQt, no flame war).
      Low res and a smaller screen also means the touchpad will be usable enough even if it's badly supported in linux. If this sounds like a silly complaint, well try the touchpad on a 1080p laptop when the speed/acceleration sliders in mouse speed settings seem to not work.

      Even if that's easy to use, you have to know about that though. Know about linux existing, about preferring a 2D desktop, know that this "shitty" hardware will run really fast - like getting Windows XP again, know that you ought to keep an eye on RAM usage if you run certain things (like 100 browser tabs and libre office : how much RAM used and left? how do I find out? is that hard or does it take a couple seconds)
      And people are computer illiterate such that we're probably talking about teens who don't know how to create a directory and copy a file.

      I'm not dismissing it at all, and this shouldn't be too hard. People figured out Windows 98 and XP back then.
      This was my moment about thinking of people who don't know or haven't learned about something yet. E.g., someone is learning right now that Ronald Reagan was president of the US in the 80s, or any fact or factoid "everyone" knows about.

  15. Chromebooks Apps are different beasts by mykepredko · · Score: 1

    You're vastly oversimplifying Chrome Apps - our app (Jade Support https://chrome.google.com/webs...) is very full featured with Javascript based UI, WebAssembly Compilers and Bluetooth Communications. User data is from GDrive (and soon also to allow OneDrive) which uses up the bandwidth you're talking about.

    But a lot of work is being done at the thin client level and it performs very well - especially when you compare it to Windows apps written in C++ doing the same function on a platform with the same processor, memory and storage.

    Google got a lot right with Chromebooks and performance for apps (not just web pages) is one of them.

  16. Bring back netbooks because they worked before. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    These look like a rehash of the old Netbook PC's from the Mid 2000's. Cheap Low End laptops. They had limited success because the economy in 2008 was bad. So people needed a cheap device. However shortly after that with the growth of the iPhone and Android Competitors which offered strong competition people found that their mobile devices, could do the same thing as their netbooks could do, but actually better, because the software was written to work for the slower systems.

    Now Google has success (in America) with the Chrome book. But these are not so much a Netbook but more of a thin client to google services. So it runs stuff in the cloud all the time.

    The low end Microsoft Windows Laptop, still bring back all the problems with the Netbook. And it is worse now, because the PC is no longer really a Personal Computer, your mobile devices do that, they are more of a Personal Workstation which you want to do real work with. Thus you really need more power then the cheap netbooks can offer.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Bring back netbooks because they worked before. by kenh · · Score: 1

      Netbooks failed because they initially only ran Linux, and to run Windows was expensive (50%, $100 upcharge for Windows). By the time the system performance caught up to the demands of Windows, the market was already burned on "netbooks" .

      They were also upgrade-limited to 2 Gigs of RAM, by the time 4 Gig RAM was available, the market moved on - to low cost full-size laptops in the sub-$300 range.

      --
      Ken
    2. Re:Bring back netbooks because they worked before. by mckwant · · Score: 1

      And the procs weren't great. I recently retired one. Eight years in, perfectly functional, 2lbs, $200@purchase. Actually bought it instead of an iPod.

      Looked up the proc on some benchmark site where 100=non-overclocked current fastest thing.

      It got a 3. Despite that, it was nearly usable running lxde. Nearly, but not quite.

      Been replaced by a refurb'd x230, but I still sorta miss it.

      --
      ceci n'est pas un sig.
    3. Re:Bring back netbooks because they worked before. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      These look like a rehash of the old Netbook PC's from the Mid 2000's. Cheap Low End laptops. They had limited success because the economy in 2008 was bad. So people needed a cheap device.

      I loved my netbooks at the time, but shortly after that time you started to need large amounts of RAM to surf the web, and they didn't support that. They also don't have hardware to accelerate the video codecs being used today, so they struggle to display full-screen video. I still use some for certain tasks, like OBD-II scanners or what have you.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Bring back netbooks because they worked before. by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      The difference between a chromebook and a netbook from the mid 00's is that the chromebook runs a very lightweight OS optimized as a thin client to Google's services. The Windows version of this is a dog because Windows isn't a lightweight OS and can't possibly run as a thin-client to a windows cloud.

      Microsoft is scared Shitless of how well Chromebooks have penetrated the K-12 education market. Chromebooks almost entirely dominate the K-12 sector at this point. Kids learning to use chromebooks means kids of the future won't be scared of Linux or running things in the cloud. That's terrifying to Microsoft.

    5. Re:Bring back netbooks because they worked before. by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      people found that their mobile devices, could do the same thing as their netbooks could do

      No they didn't, rather, they found that they don't do a whole lot with their netbooks other than messaging and media consumption. A computer is actually capable of considerably more.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  17. It's a trap [nt] by themusicgod1 · · Score: 1

    nt

    --
    GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
  18. How well does Linux Run on it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and how long will the keyboard last?

    I've gone through 2 cheap chromebooks because the keyboards wore out. Tried to replace one on a C720 with a $30 replacement and bricked the C720. Chromebooks are picky which OS they will boot if the battery is disconnected too long. Plastic rivets connect the keyboard to the case and removal of everything, including the motherboard is required to swap keyboards. Just sayin'.

    Now I have a beautiful Toshiba CB35-C3550 (1080p, sub-3lbs, 10 hrs batt) with a Core i3 CPU, but about 6 keys stopped working. Again, have to remove everything inside the case to swap the keyboard. Parts are $100+. I figure a laptop expert could do the replacement in 30 minutes, so about $150-$200 to replace it. Think I'll get a 2-3 yr, used Dell with a 10 min keyboard replacement capability instead for $230.

    Anyways, any cheap laptop I buy will need to have a user-replaceable keyboard for $30 or less.

  19. Evidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone have any evidence that putting laptops in schools increases academic performance? I've been reading education & CogSci research for years & haven't found any yet. Before somebody says, "because 21st century skills!" Please tell me the difference between those & 3rd century BC skills.

  20. Lenono 300E - write on the screen with a #2 pencil by art123 · · Score: 1

    I wonder how writing on the screen with a real pencil works???

  21. ugh There's that phrase again---buzzword bingo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Doubling down"

    Don't make it a thing; only presidents can double down anything, which makes it sound that they are doing something that only a talking head from Fox News can grasp.

  22. Lenovo 100e is $220, not $189. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google it.

  23. Is it Atom? by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

    Is it Atom? If so I'll pass. Atom performance just sucks.

    Ryzen APU please. When they come out later this year, then Ryzen 7nm APU please.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    1. Re:Is it Atom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I would love the latest Atom with 16GB DDR4 on a fanless laptop, 1366x768 IPS (wow imagine if we could get 1440x900), maybe 128GB eMMC 5.1, micro SD slot...

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldmont_Plus

      I guess it sucks, but does it really? There's all these crazy features : 4MB L2, HDMI 2.0, VP9 10bit, random number generator, OpenCL 2.0, even 802.11ac (everything I own or use is still 802.11n)
      No one will make a maxed out machine with an Atom though.

      Ryzen APU laptops are also a lowest effort (no R&D and bill of materials spent on cooling, single channel motherboard) until someone makes a good one.
      But well. Down with laptop crap? Maybe we need to shrink the desktop so that it can be small and even sit on the desk.

      See this one, Mini-STX format for Ryzen on AM4 (there was only an Intel version previously)
      https://www.techpowerup.com/forums/threads/ces-2019-asrock-launches-deskmini-a300-worlds-first-ryzen-apu-powered-mini-stx-pc.251423/
      This concept allows desktop CPU (65 watts or 35 watts including the Athlon 200GE), can stand upright, can take terabytes of storage (not just one 2TB SSD or one 512GB SD you can't afford : four storage drives). Could be paired with small desktop keyboard.

    2. Re:Is it Atom? by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Low power 7nm ryzen/vega APUs will be fine. Basically keeping my wallet closed until they land.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  24. Oh wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They better lockdown and lo-jack the shit out of these computers, because they WILL be stolen and/or sold off.

      Until they get the price point to no higher than 50 or 60 dollars, there will be trouble and woe with this.
    In the meantime, little tykums can get along just fine with a paper pad and a pencil, and maybe a $20 scientific calculator.

  25. Re:Lenono 300E - write on the screen with a #2 pen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember how we knew that the blonde had been using the word processor? ...White-out on the screen.

  26. Low cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't trust anything that is "low cost" from Microsoft. They will likely make up the difference by charging for future software updates, or by selling you a new computer once your current under-powered, low capacity machine is soon obsolete. One new feature of Windows Update is to reserve 7 GB of storage space for temporary files and for future updates since Microsoft admitted that it does not calculate how much storage space is needed for installing new updates leading to larger updates failing to install on some machines. But I have seen Windows laptops just two or three years old that were low cost and only shipped with a total of 32 GB of storage space, presumably to try to compete with Chromebooks. So Microsoft's idea of a low cost computer probably does not make much sense when it comes to saving money in the long run.

  27. Technologically advanced classroom environments. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The advantages and disadvantages are numerous in technologically advanced environments for a classroom. I believe that the pros are more than cons. They demonstrate an understanding of the academics better.

    This leads me to one conclusion: More advancement in the classroom will lead to learning in a short time.

    I will also appreciate Microsoft for their role in the technology advancement. The homework, research papers for Students are on one go now.