Slashdot Mirror
Caterers in China Are Using AI To Spot Unhygienic Cooks, Report Says (venturebeat.com)
If you've ever harbored doubts about the hygiene of the cooks flipping your burger and frying your fries, you're definitely not the only one. From a report: Thepaper.cn reports that local authorities in eastern China have tapped artificial intelligence (AI) to clamp down on unsanitary cooks in kitchens -- and to reward those who adhere to best practices. According to the report, a camera-based system currently being piloted in the Zhejiang city of Shaoxing automatically recognizes "poor [sanitation] habits" and alerts managers to offending workers via a mobile app. It's reportedly the fruit of a six-year project -- Sunshine Kitchen -- that seeks to bring transparency to food preparation in catering, hotels, school cafeterias, and restaurants.
Some may find that as creepy but honestly if I were a cook I would welcome something that alerted me if I could be doing better with food safety.
Similar to how in coding, I do not mind a plethora of warnings and errors from a compiler, because cleaning those up I can realize if I've started to slack in some ways with regards to good coding habits or proper use of the language at hand.
Food prep is such an area that can make a big difference in public safety though, it's great to see AI being used in this way.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
Caterers in China Are Using AI To Spot Unhygienic Cooks, Report Says
Real story: China is using machine vision to bypass the problem of corrupt inspectors. And it's a damned good idea, too. It raises the bar for bribery if a machine-interpreted photograph has to be taken of the workplace. To my mind, each and every inspection of basically anything ought to be evidential.
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
there are mice and roaches running all over the place. Or if food falls on the floor, or if the expiration date of foodstuffs which has long since passed.
So you have to monitor the cooks, and the facilities. Maybe even report when the manager is tapping a young worker on the food prep table.
Did anyone else read that as "Catheters in China Are Using AI To Spot Unhygienic Cooks, Report Says"?
I did not like that visualization.
" It raises the bar for bribery if a machine-interpreted photograph has to be taken of the workplace" - Or the technological equivalent of cheating, which China is heavily invested in already... "Error : defeated by broadcast TV cooking program"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4o9-vGJ0sro
Don't they put horse hair in some food to act as a filler?
Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
How long until they close the loop and add a headset hooked into AI to control the employees every move?
http://marshallbrain.com/manna1.htm
Did anyone else read that as "Catheters in China Are Using AI To Spot Unhygienic Cooks, Report Says"?
No, just you. Funny though...
I did not like that visualization.
Yeah that one will be hard to not see.
And sorry, but a bunch of matrix multiplications do not simulate a neural nets. They are just a network of weights. That's why they still suck so much, compared to e.g. real brains, or even realistic spiking neural nets with real-life activation curves.
I would rather it tried to find the tiny percentage of hygienic cooks.
So, how do you feel about TFA, which isn't talking about something to alert the cooks to food safety problems, but alerting the EMPLOYER of the cook to food safety problems caused by the cook?
As someone who strives for excellence, I feel pretty damn good about that - the effect is the same, where the employer would tell me if there were any problems.
Something you are discounting is finally truly good employees could be recognized and rewarded on the merit of how well they work, rather than on how good they are at looking like they are working when the employer is paying attention.
Why would you feel any differently?
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
And if those compiler errors affected your social credit score?
For programmers they already do, if you spend any time on sites like StackOverflow, or passing along advice on Twitter - all of the casual mistakes you might make are revealed there with the effect of a very real social score (in the case of Stack Overflow, quite a literal score).
They also do, in that every person you work with (including managers) can (and will) see and evaluate your code...
Programmers of all people should be used to the idea of social credit, as we have been living the reality of it forever.
There will always be a positive reason for embracing each creep forward by the totalitarian panopticon.
Knowledge by itself is not totalitarian. Helping to correct food preparation is an excellent idea, the employer knowing is an excellent idea. Where it starts to get tricky is beyond that realm - should the state know? Maybe in some cases to understand something like an outbreak of food poisoning? Maybe it's a pool of info about you that should only be released with your permission to potential employers, except in the case of emergency... but there are a lot of useful ways that information can end up in a score that is not totalitarian. Sure China's system itself probably crosses the line in a lot of ways, but even that is useful in understanding better where the line actually is - and where others think it is.
I've worked directly with the automated systems that monitor the minute-by-minute performance of Amazon warehouse employees. It's creepy as fuck.
If I were working there I would not find it creepy at all, because you expect warehouses with lots of easily snagged goods to be monitored out the wazoo.
Remember cameras also protect YOU, from false allegations. In a world that is increasingly prone to false charges if people do not like you, an absolute record of truth is so useful that normal citizens should probably be wearing body cameras 24x7 whenever out in public.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
The game hasn't changed. Put out a press release with the trendy buzzwords and watch the free publicity roll-in
I would argue one data point does not a slope make. This is just data being collected on job performance, the way a LOT of other jobs have performance monitored. Why is it a problem now that we can actually monitor food handling as well as we can monitor output from other work, like programming or accounting work?
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
It's creepy, when somebody *else* gets to judge/control you. Especially that somebody else is not your friend. And worst of all: If it's a permanent record (like a log file). Because they can still judge/control you for it, 20 years later. (Hence the EU's "right to be forgotten".) ... no matter what that action is!
No wait, it can still get worse: If *everyone* else can judge/control you 20 years later. (Hence the EU's data protection laws.)
Because it's said that statistically, there are about 5000 people on this planet with the means and the motivation to murder you for an action
And it doesn't even take that. A few SJWs or a dominating force like a government or corporation, are enough.
Nobody suspected you "strived" for anything except getting your head out of your asshole where it's been stuck for a decade. Good luck faggot apologist.
But will it detect my nose picking and butt scratching? How about with the spatula?
Also, sometimes a man just needs to "adjust" if you know what I mean.