Slashdot Mirror


Google Displays Fake Phone Numbers For Some Local Businesses In Toronto So They Can Record Calls (thestar.com)

grumpy-cowboy shared this article from the Toronto Star:: A spokesperson for Google has confirmed the service they've launched in Vancouver and Toronto to connect potential customers to trusted service providers funnels customers through ostensibly local phone numbers that are actually owned by Google for the purpose of call monitoring.

Google Local Services is an addition to its search platform that connects potential customers to local service providers who pay for the advertising. It launched in Toronto and Vancouver last December for locksmiths and heating, cooling and ventilation professionals. When someone in Toronto searches for a locksmith, for example, they'll see some service providers with green check marks next to the company name, meaning they've been vetted by Google.

The number next to the listing has a local area code, but that's not the business' real contact info. Instead, it's a dummy Google number that will route you to the business -- after informing you that it will be recording anything you say.

41 of 110 comments (clear)

  1. Commerce is deceit by sgage · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hey Google, Evil much?

    1. Re:Commerce is deceit by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Hey Google, Evil much?

      Why do you think that'll bothere them? They dropped that motto about not being evil a while back.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  2. One way to fight scams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Search for Locksmith Google Maps -- https://www.google.com/search?q=locksmith+google+maps -- you'll find lots of news articles about scams.

    This is one way that Google Maps team is attempting to protect its users. It's a constant battle.

    Posting as A/C because I work for Google.

    1. Re: One way to fight scams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      On one hand, you have Google with their gains.

      On the other, you now have a 3rd party company that can access customer conversations and determine if something is reported

    2. Re:One way to fight scams by Xenx · · Score: 4, Informative

      Except, that isn't whats happening here. The businesses are signing up for the service. As such, Google is providing the service for the business at their request. Whether the business fully understands what they've signed up for is a different issue, and not one I would want to blame on Google or the business as I don't know the details.

    3. Re:One way to fight scams by Xenx · · Score: 1

      Well, according to what that particular business owner said.... it brought in a lot more business.... So.....

  3. But why? by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There are only handful of possible reasons I can think of for Google doing this:

    * This is a trial run to verify rating information before mass deployment (seems like an unlikely venue for such a thing).
    * They are gathering data to improve a real-time English-French translation project. (real possibility)
    * They are gathering data of common questions people call and ask to put on their site. (real possibility)
    * They are gathering data to improve their voice tech (that everyone thought was creepy and nobody wanted) that is intended to interact with shops. (seems unlikely now)
    * They got wind of Canada's plan for world domination and they want in. ;)

    Any other ideas why they would do this?

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:But why? by AHuxley · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Voice prints.
      Ads. Tracking.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:But why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not sure why they're recording calls, but they want to provide phone numbers for advertised businesses in order to sell more ad subscriptions. Every time someone calls one of these numbers, it's a hit for their analytics campaign that they then deliver to their subscribers as a reason to continue spending money.

    3. Re:But why? by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      You're making this too complicated.

      By connecting unique advertisements to unique phone numbers, Google can track how effective the ads are.

      Also, because those phone numbers are owned by Google, not the locksmiths. And since Google Ad Words has auctions to determine how much its advertisements should cost. Google can effectively fire existing customers who do not pay them enough money, forcibly take their assigned phone number(s), and reassign any incoming leads to other local locksmiths who are willing to pay Google more money.

    4. Re:But why? by markdavis · · Score: 2

      >"By connecting unique advertisements to unique phone numbers, Google can track how effective the ads are."

      None of which requires RECORDING the conversation. That is MY problem with the concept.

    5. Re: But why? by astrofurter · · Score: 1

      Stalking. Because that's just what Big Brother Google does. The Goog likes to watch. Like a creepy stalker hiding in the shrubbery.

    6. Re:But why? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      * They are gathering data to improve their voice tech (that everyone thought was creepy and nobody wanted) that is intended to interact with shops.

      Speaking of creepy voice tech... I recently called a doctor’s office - a specialist I’d just recently seen for the first time - to reschedule an appointment. A woman answered. Every time I’d make a statement (e.g. “I need to reschedule an appointment”) there’s be a pause of a couple seconds, then I’d get a response that was accurate but seemed stilted and a little off. The reschedule was successful, but the whole thing just came across as weird.

      It sure seemed to me like I was interacting with a bot, but I haven’t heard about this tech actually being deployed before.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    7. Re:But why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Anything you say can and will be used against you"

    8. Re:But why? by Xenx · · Score: 1

      Take anything PR says with a grain of salt, but they do state why. It's for quality control, spam prevention, and to facilitate money-back requests. As this is an advertising service provided by Google, those all seem reasonable. The recording message also mentions it's for research.

    9. Re:But why? by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      You can bet the information is also used to gather voice samples to improve Google Home voice recognition. (Remember, Alphabet's privacy policy allows sharing of information across all Alphabet companies).

    10. Re:But why? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Who cares why, when it is obviously nefarious? It's clearly fraud to willfully claim that your phone number is someone else's phone number for personal gain, and what they are gaining is a complete record of a conversation with a business. That has numerous obvious commercial purposes. This should produce a slam-dunk class action lawsuit against Google.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:But why? by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Speaking of creepy voice tech... I recently called a doctorâ(TM)s office - a specialist Iâ(TM)d just recently seen for the first time - to reschedule an appointment. A woman answered. Every time Iâ(TM)d make a statement (e.g. âoeI need to reschedule an appointmentâ) thereâ(TM)s be a pause of a couple seconds, then Iâ(TM)d get a response that was accurate but seemed stilted and a little off. The reschedule was successful, but the whole thing just came across as weird.

      It sure seemed to me like I was interacting with a bot, but I havenâ(TM)t heard about this tech actually being deployed before.

      Or maybe the receptionist was stoned out of her gourd.

    12. Re:But why? by rnturn · · Score: 1

      ``Speaking of creepy voice tech... I recently called a doctorâ(TM)s office - a specialist Iâ(TM)d just recently seen for the first time - to reschedule an appointment. A woman answered. Every time Iâ(TM)d make a statement (e.g. `I need to reschedule an appointment') thereâ(TM)s be a pause of a couple seconds, then Iâ(TM)d get a response that was accurate but seemed stilted and a little off.''

      My favorite--because it's so laughable--variant of this is the automated response that follows up every voice response with something like "OK... hang on while I look up your information..." followed by fake typing sounds. One day I'll listen more carefully to see if I can detect whether the typing sounds exactly the same each time.

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  4. This is actually very common.. by poptix · · Score: 2

    Companies like Service Titan and Jobber do this too. It allows the person taking the call to receive a popup in their web browser with customer details (particularly useful for repeat customers). It's also handy to be able to review the call after the fact for details about the job without bothering the customer.

    There's nothing malicious here, phone numbers haven't been 'local' since the FCC mandated number portability.

    --
    Just because you disagree doesn't mean it's not true.
    1. Re:This is actually very common.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The FCC has no jurisdiction in Canada, so anything the FCC mandates is irrelevant.

    2. Re:This is actually very common.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Like you, i enjoy slashdot articles which clearly say things like "TORONTO" but yet someone posts about US laws, US regulators, etc.

      Canada also has phone number portability, but this was mandated by the CRTC.

      https://crtc.gc.ca/eng/phone/m...

  5. Oh the humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The other day I used one of these numbers to order a new toque because I had accidentally dropped my previous one into my poutine after a long night of pounding a few Molsons. Imagine my surprise when I found out I was being spied on. I nearly choked on my Shreddies while sitting on my chesterfield.

  6. Google will make big money from this. by swell · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is a valuable service for which Google will be well paid. Google knows the customer, Google knows the company, and both trust Google. Google can help make the sale and the company will pay far more than a for regular ad in search results.

    This is a simple extension of a long existing referral method. Decades ago I was a building contractor doing well, having fun. Then I had an opportunity to contract with Sears; the biggest and most trusted retailer in the US. Sounded great. They put a phone in my office and whenever it rang, I responded with the Sears name. The phone rang a lot and I got lots of work from those Sears customers.

    But Sears took 25% of the gross sale. So I had to charge their customers a lot more than my customers. They trusted Sears and it cost them plenty. Today the Home Depot stores offer similar services delivered by outside companies. Beware of high prices but expect good service.

    Google will be well paid for this service also.

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
    1. Re: Google will make big money from this. by Xenx · · Score: 1

      Whether you pay Google directly or not doesn't change whether Google makes money off you indirectly. And, I'm not talking about any info they have on you being sold. If any business you purchase from advertises(or advertised) through Google, your money went towards that. My point isn't that you're funding Google, but that they're not really making their money off of you paying them directly.

    2. Re: Google will make big money from this. by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

      Never tell you? They are actually quite transparent about that.
      By going to the Google ads website you can see about how much ads cost, Google's share, have a vague idea about how targeting works. Same thing for YouTube videos, Play Store purchases, etc... You can see the details of the data they collect about you (location, search history,...). They are also a public company and you can easily find the financials.

      They are really secretive about the technical details but they don't try to hide how they make money off you.

    3. Re:Google will make big money from this. by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      You went a bit far with the both trust Google part. I'm sure that some do and many don't care. There are some, like myself, that trust them as far as I could throw their HQ. Of course that's still more than I trust Facebook.

      Your scenario doesn't explain why they need to record your call.

  7. I do that all the time... by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...when a company says that they may/are recording I say "So am I!" whether I am or not. The skeevier places will immediately hang up.

  8. Not just Canada by tgetzoya · · Score: 1

    Happened to me on Wednesday, and Iâ(TM)m in Texas.

  9. Hang up by markdavis · · Score: 1

    >"it's a dummy Google number that will route you to the business -- after informing you that it will be recording anything you say."

    At which point I would hang up and find some other business or listing. How ridiculous.

    1. Re:Hang up by markdavis · · Score: 2

      >"How is it fake if it connects to the business?"

      At least partially fake, if not mostly, because you are being connected to someone you didn't mean or want to call. Deception was involved. And then to have them record the call it is just icing on the cake.

  10. Re:Nothing unique to Google by CaptQuark · · Score: 1

    I don't mind a company displaying a local number for me to call as long as it's evident that the company is located somewhere else. I guess I need to verify the address of a company and not rely on a local number to indicate the company has a presence in the local area. What I don't like is Google providing this local number in exchange for the option to record the call as a third party. I guess by disclosing the call may be recorded it gives me the option to hang up, but I would want to know it is Google recording the call and not the company I am calling.

    I don't mind a company recording my call when I ask to have my carpets cleaned, but I don't think Google needs to know this nor record it.

    ---

  11. Re:Nothing unique to Google by Xenx · · Score: 1

    To each their own on not wanting Google to record the call. However, as Google is vetting the companies it isn't crazy for them to want some QC when it comes to the calls. I'm sure there is more going on with it than only QC, and again I'm not saying people should like it. I'm just pointing out the whole setup isn't just some crazy new idea.

  12. Don't stop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    When you stop you lose ownership of your Google number and your business is screwed

  13. We used to call this Google Voice by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

    In fact almost everybody uses it. You get a Google Voice number and it can ring your office phone, your mobile phone, and an app on your computer all at once. That way you are always reachable. And it has a call recording feature. So the only thing here that is different is that the call is automatically recorded. There are some places where non-local calls actually still cost incremental money so putting the area code in the customer's locale makes sense. This is a yawner or a story.

  14. Re: Nothing unique to Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Im objecting to google recording my phone calls without telling me its google doing it

  15. Goggle isn't the only search engine out there. by rnturn · · Score: 1

    Just sayin'.

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  16. Re:Nothing unique to Google by DeVilla · · Score: 1

    I'm just pointing out the whole setup isn't just some crazy new idea.

    Honest question. What other 3rd party records random people phone calls to businesses? I'm pretty sure the BBB doesn't. I've heard of having a third party audit for quality, but never quite like this.

  17. Re:Nothing unique to Google by Xenx · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't shock me if one exists, but I definitely wouldn't be able to name anyone. But, that doesn't negate any of it. The only new "idea" is the specific arrangement of the individual ideas. It's like saying the iPhone was some revolutionary new phone idea. They took all the ideas that currently existed and combined them into one phone. They didn't do anything new or exciting. They just packaged it all into one place.

  18. Does the Phone # Stay Just For the Ad by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

    I'm wondering if the Google phone number stays just for the ad because that could create some awkward situations. Say I call up a locksmith and it's during the last week of their ad campaign. I make an appointment for them to drop by the next week to change some locks but I need to change the appointment the day before. So I've added the number to my contacts list because I didn't know it was a special number and I dial it and get a tattoo parlour or a competitor.

  19. I first saw this back in Oct '17 for a Texas comp. by Linux_Bastard · · Score: 1

    Using Chrome, I googled a Texas company and went to their website. I called the number listed there and got the "This call may be recorded" message before it started ringing through to the real company. When they answered, I hung up.
    Then I dug the real number out of my phone and called them back. I spoke to the owner of this small company, and they had no idea that it was happening. Later she reported to me that their site builder had no idea what it could be.
    So I did a little testing.

    The only browser that changed the displayed phone number was Chrome. It was listed correctly on all the other browsers.

    I then compared the html from Chrome and others, and there was an odd call replacing the static phone numbers from the original html.
    Not sure where this was coming from, either from the hosting site or the site generator, or google, I just mentaly flagged Chrome as suspect/venerable, and stopped using it except in static VM's (needed hangouts for work). I never did find anyone else who had noticed this behavior, or see it reported other places before.
    This is not exactly cogent to the OP, but I thought the audience would be the right sort of people to hear of it.

    --
    F X=0:1:9999 F D=2:1 Q:((X>2)&(X#D=0)!((D>X/2)&(X'=1))) I D>(X/2) W:$X>75 ! W X,?$X+5-$l(X) Q