Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Project Manager Says Mozilla Should Get Down From Its 'Philosophical Ivory Tower,' Cease Firefox Development (zdnet.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from ZDNet: A Microsoft program manager has caused a stir on Twitter over the weekend by suggesting that Firefox-maker Mozilla should give up on its own rendering engine and move on with Chromium. "Thought: It's time for @mozilla to get down from their philosophical ivory tower. The web is dominated by Chromium, if they really 'cared' about the web, they would be contributing instead of building a parallel universe that's used by less than five percent?" wrote Kenneth Auchenberg, who builds web developer tools for Microsoft's Visual Studio Code.

Auchenberg's post referred to Mozilla's response to Microsoft's announcement in December that it would scrap Edge's EdgeHTML rendering engine for Chromium's. The move will leave Firefox's Gecko engine as the only alternative to Chromium, which is used by Opera and dozens of other browsers. Few people agreed with Auchenberg, including engineers from both Mozilla and Chromium. Long-serving Mozillian Asa Dotzler was not impressed. "Just because your employer gave up on its own people and technology doesn't mean that others should follow," Dotzler replied to Auchenberg. Auchenberg clarified that he didn't want to see Mozilla vanish, but said it should reorganize into a research institution "instead of trying to to justify themselves with the 'protectors of the web' narrative."

19 of 444 comments (clear)

  1. the only alternative? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "he move will leave Firefox's Gecko engine as the only alternative to Chromium, which is used by Opera and dozens of other browsers."

    What about Safari, which uses webkit? It's the default browser on both macOS and iOS, and does not use Chromium.

    1. Re:the only alternative? by cheesybagel · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well the BEAST was slayed and their tags shall BLINK until the end of days.
      Book of Mozilla

    2. Re: the only alternative? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, WebKit was a fork of KHTML from the KDE Project, as used in the Konqueror web browser for Linux.

    3. Re:the only alternative? by markdavis · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >"What about Safari, which uses webkit? It's the default browser on both macOS and iOS, and does not use Chromium."

      Wake me up when it runs on even one of:

      Linux desktops
      BSD desktops
      Android phones
      Oh, and MS-Windows (since dropped 7 YEARS ago)

      Throwing out a closed-source, Apple-only product as an "alternative" is hardly the counter to the Chrome/Google monoculture.

      I believe that Firefox is the ONLY open-source, multi-platform, non-chrome based browser left. And as a bonus, this only true alternative is fast, robust, provides far more customization and user control, community-based, and backed by an organization that cares about standards, security, privacy, and internet freedom.

      So if you want to fight our rapid plunge into to the next dark-age/IE-rerun, then I suggest you install and use Firefox on whatever platform you use and encourage others to do the same.

      It is absolutely SHOCKING to see some sites that are already becoming essentially Chrome-only as their rendering is partially broken in Firefox and their "solution" when you complain is to install Chrome. I never thought we would have to go through this s*** again. But here we are.

    4. Re:the only alternative? by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A few truths exist, one is that if Microsoft says you shouldn't do a thing, it must be critically important for you to double down on that thing.

  2. Complete moron by brickhouse98 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What a jackass. Sure, everything was made better by decreasing competition and just being subservient to an open source engine that is mainly influenced by one big player. This idiot got a lot more attention than he probably thought he would- good.

    1. Re:Complete moron by gl4ss · · Score: 5, Insightful

      the real reason would be to ask why the f would you choose microsofts chromium browser over anything else?

      besides, wtf would mozilla "research" if they dropped their own rendering engine? would they research how to keep adblockers running on chromium?

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Complete moron by Z00L00K · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I think that you have figured it out - the nail in the eye of many ad providers is the strength of Firefox/Gecko when it comes to allowing ad blocking tech.

      Without ad blocking the web would be useless and we could as well just look up the small waterholes that run no or very limited ads.

      By driving development to a single rendering engine you allow a very limited number of people in control of what we are served.

      As long as the rendering engines follows the standards declared by the World Wide Web Consortium then we don't have a problem. If they have "hidden features" as IE had for a long time, then we are as users in the hands of the major corporations.

      We are in a Max Headroom world. Hello Blank Reg!

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  3. Makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    These days Microsoft makes more of their money off of abusing people's privacy then selling software, so of course they are opposed to the browser that still allows savvy users to block that shit.

  4. Typical Microsoft Employee -- Arrogant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Edge failed so cut down anyone who continues to try and compete.

    Pathetic.

    1. Re:Typical Microsoft Employee -- Arrogant by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Insightful

      firefox is pretty much doomed at this point as they will almost certainly never recover marketshare at this point and it only gets worse from here as no one tests sites for firefox anymore.

      Why don't you put a "Best viewed with IE" blinking-GIF on your homepage?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  5. Um, WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Chromium is the "parallel universe" here, not Firefox. The Firefox browser is far older and can trace it's origins back to Mosaic. Of course, the tweet was posted by someone from Microsoft, who is clearly biased on the matter. Firefox is the only significant competition left, and it's good that users still have a choice.

    1. Re: Re:Um, WTF? by bheerssen · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Mozilla has been committed to social issues since before there was a Firefox. What do you think the whole "Take back the web" thing was about? They are trying to keep the web free, as in freedom, for everyone. If that's not a social issue, nothing is.

      --
      (Score: -1, Stupid)
  6. It takes some bravado by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 5, Insightful

    to commit career suicide by admitting you backed the wrong horse.

    Gecko, for all its warts, is now the only non-Safari option (sorry, Tim, I don't own any Apple hardware) to avoid a Google monoculture.

  7. Don't take advice from your enemy by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 5, Insightful
    When your enemy tells you you're stupid and you should be doing something else, never do that. She'll always say things like "you're wasting your time on useless efforts" - if your enemy really thought that, she'd rejoice that you were wasting your time.

    Your enemy is not worried that you will fail. She is worried that you will succeed.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  8. this piece of FUD brought to you...... by Indy1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    by the same pack of flaming assholes who have wasted 20+ years and billions of dollars designing shitty, bug ridden, non standards compliant web browsers, that have such massive security holes that any 13 year old script kiddie could drive a tank through them.

    Yeah M$, you're a real authority on web development *sarcasm*.

    --
    Lawyers, MBA's, RIAA? A jedi fears not these things!
  9. monocultures suck; long live the open web! by neonman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Three Issues:
    1.) Monocultures Suck: Experienced web developers know that no browser is without its deviations from W3C specifications. One of the ways that this becomes evident is when the developer observes inconsistent behavior from one browser to another. Bug reports get filed, and hopefully, just hopefully, if the browser vendor is not overrun with arrogant "WONTFIX" jerks, the behavior is corrected to conform with the standards document. In a monoculture, this doesn't happen as often, and gradually, the sole-surviving implementation displaces the documented standard, creating a significant barrier to the creation of alternative implementations in the event that people start to crave competition again. Instead of implementing the standard, an alternative browser now has to reverse engineer and mimic all of the bugs in the dominant rendering engine, so as to be compatible with the same web content.

    2.) Mozilla happens to be a "Protector of the Web", and the "Narrative" is Appropriate: One of the great virtues of Mozilla is that, in addition to being a non-proffit organization, they aren't an operator of any major web properties. As such, they aren't subject to the conflicts of interest that you often see with companies like Google and Microsoft, who are often tempted to tailor their browsers to their commercial interests: interests that may be at odds those of the user.

    3.) As of early 2019, Firefox Significantly Outperforms Chromium: Has Auchenberg even tried Firefox in the past year? Ever since the release of Firefox Quantum, Firefox has been blowing the pants off Chrome. Better yet, its Servo rendering engine is written in Rust, a modern language with safety guarantees that aren't achievable in C++. Mozila's leadership with Rust points to the possibility that we will one day be able to have some confidence in the security of our computing environments. Sticking with C++ is not the path forward if we hope to ever fully trust complex software like browsers.

    1. Re:monocultures suck; long live the open web! by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Interesting

      3.) As of early 2019, Firefox Significantly Outperforms Chromium: Has Auchenberg even tried Firefox in the past year? Ever since the release of Firefox Quantum, Firefox has been blowing the pants off Chrome.

      It follows the standards better in my experience, too. Still waiting for Chrome to catch up.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  10. It's time for @microsoft to get down... by Paul+Doom · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...from their philosophical ivory tower. The web is dominated by Linux, if they really 'cared' about the web, they would be contributing instead of building a parallel universe that's used by less than ? percent?

    Cool argument, bro!

    --
    "Life is life." --Laibach