Slashdot Mirror


Google Cleans Up Gmail App With An All-White Redesign (engadget.com)

While Gmail on the web was significantly redesigned last year, the app for Android and iOS stayed relatively unchanged, with the exception of an update last year that removed the bold colors in favor of an almost entirely white look. Engadget reports that a redesigned Gmail for mobile is starting to roll out today and it will be available to all Android and iOS users in the coming weeks. Engadget reports: Functionally, the new Gmail mobile app isn't wildly different than what came before. There's a button in the lower-right corner to compose a new email, just like before -- it's just white with a multi-colored "plus" sign, the same glyph that shows up in Gmail and Drive on the web. The iconic top red bar is now white, and the whole top area is a search bar; the old app required tapping a smaller target to get into search. Finally, there's a shortcut right to the account switcher on the main page. Previously, switching accounts required opening the sidebar, but now that option is front and center.

A few features that came to the web version of Gmail make their way to mobile today. Probably most recognizable is that attachment previews will show up below the messages, making it easier to both find messages with attachments and get a sense of the content. For those that prefer to see more messages, Google also has "comfortable" and "compact" density options that remove attachment previews and avatars, respectively. The large red phishing warnings that Gmail on the web shows also now show up in the app. Visually, it looks just like you'd expect if you've tried any of Google's recent mobile apps -- it's basically all white, with the new Google font throughout.

22 of 138 comments (clear)

  1. White? by LordKronos · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wow, perfect. So not only does it look more bland**, but now that phones are beginning to move to oleds we get MORE white in the UI? Good thinking!!!

    **not sure why everyone seems to think it's good to not having lines denoting the borders of anything, whether it be separators between emails or the edges of a button.

    1. Re:White? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

      The app is actually written in Brainfuck++.

    2. Re:White? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      "IT'S OKAY TO BE WHITE"

          -- Google, 2019

    3. Re:White? by tooyoung · · Score: 2

      I read the summary and came in to make similar criticism to pretty much all of the comments I've seen so far. I mean, white on white on white? It seems ridiculous.

      But then I looked at the before and after screenshots and I have to say... the after seems much more straight forward. Having dealt with a number of email apps, the after looks simply like a list of emails. The before looks... weird. The red portions are super exaggerated. It's not bad by any means, but the red seems like overkill to draw attention to the search and the new email areas. The new design actually makes it much more clear that it is a search area.

      I'm no fan of redesign for redesign sake, and I'm definitely sensitive to changes in any website/app that I rely on. Still, this one seems like an improvement despite how it's positioned in the summary.

    4. Re:White? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Are you sure you are not confusing the old and the new. The old design has the red bar at the top, and the clear list of emails. The new one adds some random labels to the list at the top, more crap I need to scroll past.

      The old design had clear delimiting lines between mails and it was really obvious where the buttons and other UI elements were. Just the right amount of contrast.

      The other big problem with email is lack of dark mode support. HTML mail is almost always a white background.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  2. Modern UX design by ArhcAngel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The current crop of UX designers seem to be following the philosophy of listen to what your audience wants and make sure to avoid that at all cost. We've gone from vivid intricate icons to stick figures in shades of grey!

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    1. Re:Modern UX design by I75BJC · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree! Gmail was "perfect" for my email habits and likes but Gmail insists on changing things on a regular basis. It gets worse (shittier) with each "new" "improvement". In past years, I could keep the old version that I liked but I guess too many people, like me, thought the old version was good enough not to want to change. Then Gmail started forcing me to change whether I wanted to or not. Thankfully, on my iOS devices, I can skip the changes by staying with iOS' own Mail application. Gmail had a wonderful product years ago but they keep trying to improve it by making it worse. Yuck!

    2. Re:Modern UX design by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's no good. I can still vaguely see some shapes of some controls, and there's an unsightly pile of black text to the left. The UX designers need to keep polishing until everything is a pure, beautiful, white form, unblemished by unsightly distractions.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    3. Re: Modern UX design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They forced me to upgrade from Gmail to inbox on my phone now I'm getting messages saying I'm going to be forced back to Gmail. Google's biggest problem is they're always changing. No consistency. This isn't about not embracing good change, it's just they seem to have no fuckng idea what they're doing. Google +, hangouts and all the other chat apps they've released and switched and flicked between since Google talk. I was a regular hangouts user and the whole debabcleeant I stopped using their platform. Partly because I just found it easier to use something more stable and partly because everyone else I use left in droves. I currently have 3 people I could actually talk to and get a response in hangouts and we all prefer telegram. Of course there are privacy reasons we all left Google for encrypted chats, sick of having our data farmed and used against us to try a different steal our money without even knowing, but the lack of stability certainly had more of an effect.

    4. Re:Modern UX design by mentil · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Still... un... clean!...
      *continues frantically scrubbing the UI as it bleeds*

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
  3. Thank God for IMAP by Kunedog · · Score: 4, Insightful

    n/t

  4. Is it a Flash when it doesn't? by Pitawg · · Score: 2

    This is the affirmative response to "Your face is too dim in the front facing camera when the screen is dark."

    The lighter the screen/alternative-lighting, the better the image of you and the room you are in.

    This is not a surprise. Just because you were not using the front camera does not mean it has to go to waste.

  5. GOD DAMN YES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    THAT"S WHAT I NEED! Instead of using color and shapes to help me distinguish various functions and areas on the screen, just make it all white on white with white trim. ITS SO SIMPLE A CHILD COULD DO IT!

  6. Traditional UX design: Change things by aberglas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Whatever it was, make it different.

    This is not only a method that ensures work for UI designers. It genuinely works. Most people will recognize "new" vs "old", and want "new". "New" just looks better than "old". Always.

    Eventually UIs will have white text on pale grey backgrounds before the next crop of designers develops green text on a black background and we will all know that this new green screen design is the pinnacle of novel user experience development.

    1. Re:Traditional UX design: Change things by halivar · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No, designers are already all-in on green text. Users track green "calls to action" faster than any other color, and feel better about the action being the right one. You ever notice how those fake download sites all have big, green, "Download Now" buttons? It's psychology. (disclaimer: I have run too many of these damn UI/UX user trials)

  7. Not everyone is happy. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hotblack Desiato’s and his band Disaster Area would prefer an all black on black interface ...

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  8. with respect to Douglas Adams: by acroyear · · Score: 4, Funny

    "It’s the wild color scheme that freaks me out,’ said Zaphod, whose love affair with the app had lasted almost three minutes after the download. 'Every time you try and operate these weird white controls that are labeled in white on a white background, a little white light lights up in white to let you know you’ve done it.’"

    --
    "But remember, most lynch mobs aren't this nice." (H.Simpson)
    -- Joe
  9. Cringe by cowdung · · Score: 2

    I always cringe at Google redesigns.. I thought Gmail was just fine when it came out. Then they started messing with the UI. It wasn't an improvement.. now things are harder to see, they don't stand out as much. Now they're at it again. I worry.

    Same goes for Chrome. They seem to come out with something really good in the beginning but then they want to "improve" it and they just mess it up.

  10. I can't be the only one :( by Fly+Swatter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can't be the only one that finds a dark background and white text easier on the eyes. It is just more comfortable. Modern UIs are like staring at a bright light bulb all day. I guess they are fine outdoors and under bright lights, but in normal inside lighting conditions, especially in a home all white is just annoying. Paper products are like this because paper is inherently light, and reflected light works well there. Computers are shining lights into your eyes, it is a completely different medium - I wish manufacturers would realize this - they killed off paper now stop trying to imitate it.

    1. Re:I can't be the only one :( by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Back in the 80s when GUIs were new we used to have grey backgrounds. That provided enough, but not too much contrast with black text, and allowed white text for highlights, and most colours worked fine too. With black or white backgrounds there are always some colours that don't work (e.g. black/blue, white/yellow).

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:I can't be the only one :( by jez9999 · · Score: 2

      I'm probably in a minority here, but I disagree with this. For some reason white text on a black background makes my eyes strain after a while. I prefer dark text on light.

  11. Crunched it, now stretched it by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2
    Back in the day when smart phones were new, so many web sites scrunched their regular web page designed for 15 inch displays into those 3.5 inch screens. Now, they are designing their sites for 6 inch phones and are stretching the same thing on 24 inch displays.

    Nothing to show what are clickable and what are not. There is no shortage of screen real estate, still the site comes with minimal info on huge fonts.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact