Slashdot Mirror


Tesla Reports Second-Consecutive Profit; CFO Retires Again

Rei writes: Yesterday, Tesla reported their 4th quarter earnings, representing their second consecutive profit. While earnings per share missed analyst expectations ($1.93 vs. $2.20), revenue beat expectations by around $100 million and free cash flow ($910 million) was more than double the First Call consensus of $395 million. Model 3 margins were maintained at an impressive 20% level despite significant reductions in the average sale price in Q4; labor hours fell by 20% in Q4 and 65% in the second half of 2018 alone. With $3.7 billion in the bank, Tesla is now well positioned to repay its $920 million March convertible bond obligations in cash. Severance costs and an increase in inventory in transit due to shipments to Europe and China are expected to hurt Tesla's profits in Q1, but guidance for Q2 onward in 2019 is strong. Highlights planned for 2019 include introduction of faster V3 Supercharging early in the year, Model Y and pickup unveiling in the middle of the year, base Model 3 unveiling in the middle of the year, and full-vehicle production in the under-construction Shanghai Gigafactory by the end of the year -- the first wholly foreign-owned auto plant in China, which has seen extensive governmental support.

Despite a generally positive earnings report and conference call, the atmosphere was soured by the news that Tesla's 11-year Tesla veteran CFO Deepak Ahuja was re-retiring. Having previously retired in 2015, Deepak returned to Tesla in 2017 to replace outgoing CFO Jason Wheeler. Ahuja will remain with the company for several months as CFO and then become a senior advisor, while his protege Zach Kirkhorn fills his role. The market reacted negatively to the news, with Tesla trading down 4.5% premarket.

102 comments

  1. So Rei is our official Tesla investment liason? by ChesterRafoon · · Score: 2, Funny

    I always thought that, nice to see it official.

    1. Re:So Rei is our official Tesla investment liason? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I always thought that, nice to see it official.

      Yes, every poster on here is some official liaison officer for some corporation. There's no such thing as personal interest articles anymore.

      Does anyone disagree? Who's paying to shill against me?

      Mind you I do like how Rei is rubbing the smug shits' on Slashdot who insisted that Tesla would be bankrupt next month (for the past 24 months running) noses in it.

  2. Re: So Rei is our official Tesla investment liason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't you just fuck off and let her be? No one gives a shit about your jealousy and bitterness.

  3. Good news everyone! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "labor hours fell by 20% in Q4"

  4. Re:Stock tanking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reading comprehension is low in this one.

  5. Re: So Rei is our official Tesla investment liason by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 0, Troll

    Mainly because she's publicly and loudly long TSLA, and has long ago shown herself utterly incapable of being objective or otherwise critically thinking about much of anything relating to Tesla or Elon.

    That makes this story nothing more than a PR puff piece.

    Other than that, party on.

  6. Re: Stock tanking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Teslaâ(TM)s claims of a profit are fraudulent.

  7. Rei has been up front about buying TSLA by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    If your assertion is that it is a Tesla employee, [citation needed]

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Rei has been up front about buying TSLA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [citation needed]

      Ask and you shall receive.

  8. Re: Stock tanking by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    TeslaÃ(TM)s claims of a profit are fraudulent.

    [citation needed]

    [browser settings change needed]

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  9. I regret by 110010001000 · · Score: 0, Troll

    I regret shorting Tesla stock. It was the biggest mistake I ever made! I lost a bundle when the stock skyrocketed last year. I should have listened. But I bought a bunch of Tesla stock last week so I am guaranteed to make it all back (and more)

    1. Re: I regret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as you stop spamming Tesla stories Iâ(TM)m happy.

    2. Re:I regret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how can you be losing money on a short for TEsla? unless you did them at a stupidly low price you should still be well in the money.

    3. Re:I regret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *** whooosh ***

    4. Re:I regret by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      So, all those post you made that slammed Tesla were posted while you were short on TSLA?

      Yeah, I have no sympathy for your losses.

      Or are you just trolling?

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    5. Re:I regret by Kokuyo · · Score: 1

      The post is dripping with sarcasm.... I think? :D

    6. Re:I regret by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      He's trolling. That's what he does.

      Every once in a while he mistakenly posts something insightful while trolling. This is not one of those times.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    7. Re:I regret by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

      Right. Trolling.

    8. Re:I regret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TSLA stock is very unstable. It's down 12% from where it was a year ago, but about the same as it was 360 days ago. It's up 25% from where it was 10 months ago.

      The market as a whole is down about 5% from where it was a year ago.

      Your point is invalid and anybody with any understanding (including yourself, I'm sure) knows that. Just comes off as trolling.

      If you wanted to say something about how Tesla stock sucks and the wild price variations is driven by speculation rather than fundamentals - sure, that would make sense.

    9. Re:I regret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's an interesting indicator. If he posts something that seems to agree with the consensus, it's very likely that the consensus is wrong.

  10. Re-retiring by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Thanks for the good summary. I read stories this morning along the lines of "Management Shake-Up at Tesla, CFO Out, Replaced by VP of Finance."

    I shall now go mark those news sources as "fake news, shorts colluders."

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:Re-retiring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, it is perfectly normal for a CFO to re-retire. I mean after all, he is 56, and these guys aren't in it for the money. Why would a CFO want to stick around a company that is going to make billions? They aren't interested in stuff like that.

      What if he already has more money than he cares for in the bank and would rather spend his time sipping margaritas by the beach? What if, even though he leaves, he keeps a substantial part of his stock and will still make millions if Tesla's stock goes up?

      I mean, you may be right, but just because someone disagrees with you doesn't mean something fishy is happening. I recently left a position as CIO at a startup where I had 4% of stock (which I lost with my decision) because I disagreed with one of my partners and the disagreement was too big to deal with. The company still exists and it may be doing well enough for the stock to be worth quite a bit of money. Should I have stayed there just because of that money? There's more things to life than being a millionaire and I already have another job that more than pays for the bills...

    2. Re:Re-retiring by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

      Definitely. He probably had enough money, retired, then came back because he lost some, then retired again because he had enough money again. CFO's don't really care that much about money either. Once they get enough money, they like to retire.

    3. Re:Re-retiring by hipp5 · · Score: 1

      No, it is perfectly normal for a CFO to re-retire. I mean after all, he is 56, and these guys aren't in it for the money. Why would a CFO want to stick around a company that is going to make billions? They aren't interested in stuff like that.

      I imagine that "Senior Advisor" role comes with a hefty paycheque and less stress.

    4. Re:Re-retiring by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2
      He is an Indian. Wrote his joint entrance examination in 1979, went to one of the IITs. Last name Ahuja. Very high chance his family had been civil servants to the governments for several generations. Indian civil servants retire at age 58. Might have changed recently but that is the traditional retirement age in India.

      A very traditional Indian would start disavowing worldly pleasures and lose the "attachments or bonds" with the material, the mundane, the carnal self and prepare to connect with the spiritual universe, typically starting from age 60.

      There is no real evidence he is that traditional, but such world view is very common in India, especially among the Brahmin castes. (Again no evidence that he is a twice born).

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    5. Re:Re-retiring by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Perhaps he doesn't want to be the richest guy in the graveyard?

      If he's got a nice comfortable pile, maybe he'd like to go live life. As a C-level exec, I'm sure he's got plenty of vested stock grants to rest on as well.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    6. Re:Re-retiring by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      More importantly, it would mean that any unvested stock awards continue to vest.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    7. Re:Re-retiring by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Right. Like I said, CFOs aren't very interested in money. Once they get enough they like to take it easy.

    8. Re: Re-retiring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he should have invested in producing long tailed revenue streams via youtube videos. Then he wouldn't need to go back to his old place pretending to be a new person like a fucking loser.

    9. Re:Re-retiring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because after you make enough money to comfortably live on, happiness does nothing but go down. Its a proven fact (in general, not for everyone).

      Maybe he wants to retire and spend his time with his friends and family? I know, what concept, in this current society that values money above all else.

      Not everyone sees making as much money as absolutely possible as the end goal in this life. Its mostly the young people who do.

    10. Re:Re-retiring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or he came back because he had friends there, or cared about what the company was doing, wanted to help society lose our dependence on oil, etc.

      Not everything is about the money, child. You'll learn when you grow up.

  11. Re: Stock tanking by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    âoeYouâ(TM)re a faggotâ sent from my iPhone.

    If Slashdot has an irony achievement, I vote that you receive it.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  12. Re: Stock tanking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [faggot needs to fix their browser settings]

  13. Re: So Rei is our official Tesla investment liaso by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They literally turned a profit twice, you dumb fuck.

  14. Re: So Rei is our official Tesla investment liason by rtb61 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Checked the REI track definitely an Tesla fan big time but even a broken clock can be right twice a day. The Tesla short was all about buying Tesla on the cheap after financially crushing the company, a nasty plot schemed up by a car company and hedge fund managers, it failed and people should have been prosecuted including at the SEC because what they did to back the shorters against company investors, umm.

    Yet still cars will be the smaller part of Tesla revenue versus power systems. Suburban distributed power system, solar and battery, with Tesla buying the sparkage after selling the kit and then onselling that sparkage to major buyers at far better rate than the power grid incumbents who are always pretty shite and way to greedy, well the corruptly privatised ones who are typically very bad.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  15. Tesla: set up by cowboys, run by Indians? by maroberts · · Score: 1

    I'kk get my coat

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

    1. Re:Tesla: set up by cowboys, run by Indians? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'kk

      Fat, sloppy writing heavily implies fat, sloppy thinking.

  16. Re: So Rei is our official Tesla investment liason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cdreimer left /. after 20+ years and posted 100+ videos in 2018. His trolls are still butthurt about this.

    The thing to do for him: post more videos :)

  17. Lots of loose money at the top of the market, but: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  18. More Info by mentil · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Their earnings report says they plan to begin tooling for the Model Y this year, and 70% of its parts will be in common with the Model 3, which should lead to a quicker ramp-up than the Model 3 had. They're also still claiming to be working on the Semi, and are going to seriously ramp up solar roof production this year.

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
  19. Re: So Rei is our official Tesla investment liason by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If Rei could just be a bit more objective and fair she would be a great source of Tesla info. She clearly spends a lot of time learning everything she can about the inner workings of the company, with some insightful and interesting posts...

    But then ruins it by idolizing Musk and their cars to a ridiculous degree. Also their quarterly earnings aren't particularly interesting.

    There are some forums where people have really interesting discussions about the current crop of EVs. it's a shame we can't do that there, but it's already polarized into Tesla fans and oil shills.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  20. This is actually very nice by Terje+Mathisen · · Score: 5, Informative

    Elon Musk have been extremely clear, from the very beginning, that Tesla was a private bet almost sure to fail, but still worthwhile in order to speed up the transition away from ICE cars. The fact that they now seem to be able to actually make this a sustainable business is great!

    Full disclosure: I'm a Norwegian electrical engineer who waited close to 25 years before the first 4x4 long range EV, i.e. a Tesla Model S70D was announced, we have used that as our only car for 3 years now.

    Tesla is of course one of the best-selling car brands in Norway due to our extreme EV incentives, which include no toll road fees, mostly free parking, very low road tax, all on top of zero import duties or sales tax. With 98%++ of our electricity coming from hydro, this is a very nice situation indeed. Currently well over half of all new cars here are pure EVs (a majority) or plug-in hybrids, with ICE cars making up the remaining third or so.

    Terje Mathisen

    --
    "almost all programming can be viewed as an exercise in caching"
    1. Re:This is actually very nice by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

      "extreme EV incentives, which include no toll road fees, mostly free parking, very low road tax, all on top of zero import duties or sales tax"

      And here I thought it was about saving the planet! Who knew?

    2. Re:This is actually very nice by froggyjojodaddy · · Score: 3

      You can have both, it would seem.

    3. Re:This is actually very nice by hipp5 · · Score: 1

      3. Musk doesn’t get a flying fuck about climate change. If he did, he wouldn’t be making frivolous 20 mile flights in his private jet.

      Or maybe he has a sense of proportion and understands that his private jet is a drop in the bucket compared to the fact that he's been a huge factor in changing the automotive world for the better.

      Individual actions are nice and all, but they are dwarfed by changes to standards and to industry practices.

    4. Re:This is actually very nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe he’s just a conman.

    5. Re:This is actually very nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's an interesting reason to insult someone. You're entertaining.

      "In early Series A funding, Tesla Motors was joined by Elon Musk, J. B. Straubel and Ian Wright, all of whom are retrospectively allowed to call themselves co-founders of the company."

    6. Re:This is actually very nice by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Apparently! As long as you can afford a $60,000+ car you can have it all!

    7. Re:This is actually very nice by skaralic · · Score: 1

      It might be a good car ($100k cars usually are), but it's a little disingenuous to feel smug about driving a tax-supported EV in Norway when you consider how that is being paid for - oil exports.

      Petroleum exports are 17% of GDP, 21% of total state revenue and a whooping 43% of total exports!

      https://www.norskpetroleum.no/...

      Oil exports are taxed at 78%: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Your electricity might be coming from Hydro but the money that paid for the car and continues to subsidise it comes from selling oil.

    8. Re:This is actually very nice by skaralic · · Score: 1

      3. Musk doesn’t get a flying fuck about climate change. If he did, he wouldn’t be making frivolous 20 mile flights in his private jet.

      Or maybe he has a sense of proportion and understands that his private jet is a drop in the bucket compared to the fact that he's been a huge factor in changing the automotive world for the better.

      Individual actions are nice and all, but they are dwarfed by changes to standards and to industry practices.

      So, as individuals, we are all ok to keep driving gas guzzlers?

    9. Re: This is actually very nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it's ok for musk to do fly his private jet, but no OK for me to drive a gas guzzler? Individual actions and all.

    10. Re:This is actually very nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      depends. How many multibillion dollars green energy and electric car businesses have you started?

    11. Re:This is actually very nice by vipvop · · Score: 1

      You mean industry standards like quality control, doors that open in the cold, and trunks that keep water off of your belongings?

    12. Re:This is actually very nice by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Apparently! As long as you can afford a $60,000+ car you can have it all!

      You can have it all for much less than that when you're not being a disingenuous arse.

    13. Re:This is actually very nice by froggyjojodaddy · · Score: 1

      We've been through this before but $60k+ for a car is NOT all that unusual now. I don't know why you keep claiming it is

  21. SP500 not in 2019 April by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2
    We were hoping Tesla will be included in SP500 index in April. But it has made 450 mill in Q3+Q4. And lost 700 mill in Q2. So to have positive earnings in the trailing four quarters, it needs to make 250 mill in Q1 of 19. But the conference call guidance was a very small profit. So it is not going to be included in April. But when 2019 Q2 comes in the 700 mill loss will roll off the time frame. So even if it makes a loss it will definitely make it. Results will be announced in July 2019, so certain to be included.

    Market will anticipate it, index funds would have buy some 6 billion in TSLA stock. And steady purchase thereafter. But it is not something that trigger any kind of short squeeze of any kind.

    Already big smart shorts have closed their positions. 41 million TSLA shares were shorted in Jun 2018. Now the number is around 24 million. Still high, but the trend is down. Two more months it might not be the most heavily shorted stock in the market.

    Elon is surprisingly well behaved. If his demeanor is any indication, the company is doing very well.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:SP500 not in 2019 April by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Yeah the top 5 shorted stocks are Tesla, Apple, Netflix, Facebook, Amazon. You definitely wouldn't want to be in that list! Good analysis.

    2. Re:SP500 not in 2019 April by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
      Why? Shorts do not hurt a company's day to day operations. Stock price does not affect daily ops at all.

      Stock price influences cost of capital. Any company depending on fresh capital could be seriously affected by short and slander schemes, (the opposite of pump and dump schemes). Most vulnerable to rumor mill are the banks and insurance companies. So much so, the banks are federally insured to some extent and heavily regulated with regards to capital requirements. Insurance companies are also seriously regulated and their books are audited. Tech companies in their cash burn phase are very vulnerable to bad news and rumors.

      Tesla assumed the bond obligations of Solar City. Lots of people thought it has bitten a piece too big chew, and too big swallow and too stuck to spit out. So they hoped to cut Tesla's access to capital, make a killing, and probably pick the pieces at fire sale prices. That bet seems to have gone wrong.

      Solar City bonds have hurt Tesla, but did not kill it.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    3. Re:SP500 not in 2019 April by MachineShedFred · · Score: 2

      As with all things, context matters.

      If you have $900M in convertible bonds coming due, and the short float is dragging your stock price under the conversion price, it can matter very much.

      That's $900M coming out of cash on hand, rather than issuing stock certificates.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    4. Re:SP500 not in 2019 April by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

      Short float doesn't drag the stock down. You know what companies also hated short sellers? Enron, Tycho, Worldcom. Normal companies don't care. Apple/Amazon are also highly shorted yet they never whine about it.

    5. Re:SP500 not in 2019 April by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Amazon and Apple are not highly shorted. They are both at about 1 day to cover.

      I did make a few thousand last year from a successful short of Sears, but I never posted negative information about Sears without also stating that I held a short position.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    6. Re:SP500 not in 2019 April by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
      Yes, shorts can make capital expensive. This scenario of bond coming due is exactly the time they try to choke a company. If it does not have the cash, it has to go to the bond market. If it can't raise the cash it will go belly up. That is the short seller's idea/plan/hope/prayer.

      This will not affect the day to day operation. Of course morale will suffer, some vendors will balk supplying, all kinds of secondary things will happen.

      But back in Dec18 it said it is going to convert only 50% of the bonds. Cash for the rest. They had internal numbers and felt confident they could easily pay off 460 mill. That sent a signal the bond is no big deal for now. In the call they announced they have enough cash to pay the bond. The moment they dont need to raise fresh capital, all the leverage the shorts have are gone. They can't do anything other than trolling the net and pushing negative stories to the media.

      Next bond is not due till 2020 Mar. So they will be pushing, "competition is coming", "demand is evaporating". Some truth in both. How much, to what extent? Lets wait and see.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    7. Re:SP500 not in 2019 April by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We were hoping Tesla will be included in SP500 index in April.

      "We"?
      Who's "We"?
      Did you Freudian slip your conflict of interests in your incessant shilling of Tesla/Musk 140Mandak262Jamuna?

  22. Re:Lots of loose money at the top of the market, b by DrXym · · Score: 2

    Perhaps if Musk actually delivered the $35,000 car he promised in the first place, 2 years ago, they might be able to afford it.

  23. stock market is da suxxorz by sad_ · · Score: 1

    what the hell, nothing but good news, one tidbit about the CFO re-retiring (really, you should have seen it comming that this was only a short stint) and the tesla stock still drops!

    meanwhile after facebook financial announcements, the stock goes up, while it's probably the most scummy company on the planet hated by most of its users!

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
    1. Re:stock market is da suxxorz by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
      It is not CFO retirement that dropped the stock. It is the delay in getting into SP500.

      Tesla said 2019 Q1 profit will be small. Not big enough to have positive earnings in the trailing four quarters. Which means it wont get into SP500 in April 19. It will definitely get into SP500 in July 2019, when the 2018Q2 loss of 700 million rolls of the time window. So the market is readjusting the price for the 3 month delay, that is all.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    2. Re: stock market is da suxxorz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL. Wishful thinking at its finest. The Q1 stock ain't shit, but I promise the q2 stock will be all that and a bag of chips.

      So you hear yourself?

  24. Re: So Rei is our official Tesla investment liason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    *Tesla turns around and makes profit*

    *article reports that Tesla had turned around and made a profit*

    REEEEE puff piece REEEEE

    Whatever you say, Screechy McAutism.

  25. Things so good. CFO retired .... TWICE!!!! by mightypenguin · · Score: 1

    You don't see that very often. I'm a little jealous.

  26. Re:Lots of loose money at the top of the market, b by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2
    True. As a plain statement of fact that is precisely true. If he had delivered a 35 K car 2 years ago... yeah, sure.

    Also true, he did not.

    But what he did deliver, 50K car 1 year ago is still a stunning achievement far beyond anything the traditional car companies managed to do so far.

    There are some exciting announcements from them. There are some exciting products from them. Jaguar I-Pace, Hyundai Kona... Whether they beat Tesla, or they coexist with Tesla, or they reduce Tesla to be some boutique vendor of strange electric cars, Auto world has been shaken thoroughly to the core.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  27. Re:Lots of loose money at the top of the market, b by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In other words demand is not insanely high.

  28. Re: So Rei is our official Tesla investment liason by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 1

    The actual news story (and the one the rest of the media actually reported) is that Tesla missed expectations on profitability -- rather badly, actually ($1.93 per share rather than $2.20, and on more revenue than expected, which makes the profit margin even lower than expected). And that performance resulted from continuing to skim the high-margin cars off the Model 3 backlog, so there are no structural reasons for it to get any better, and plenty of reasons (e.g., when people actually start needing significant warranty work on the huge fleet he's pumping out the door) for it to get worse.

    "Tesla Reports Second Consecutive Profit" sort of... how to put this gently... skirts all that.

  29. Tesla Click bait mania seems to be abating by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
    This thread did not start for 24 hours after the earnings call.

    It has barely gathered 50 comments over 12 hours.

    Looks like most paid trolls have been reassigned and only the self motivated trolls are infesting these threads.

    Looks like Tesla will be left alone soon, like Ford or GM. Of interest to a few people and does not attract clicks.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Tesla Click bait mania seems to be abating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like Tesla will be bankrupt soon.

      Fixed that for you.

    2. Re:Tesla Click bait mania seems to be abating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This thread did not start for 24 hours after the earnings call.

      It has barely gathered 50 comments over 12 hours.

      Looks like most paid trolls have been reassigned and only the self motivated trolls are infesting these threads.

      Looks like Tesla will be left alone soon, like Ford or GM. Of interest to a few people and does not attract clicks.

      I was going to post a comment along those lines. Where are all the rabid haters? Just the usual suspects that seem to miss some basic logic but are very happy patting each other on the back.

      The best they can do is personally attack Rei and give an old man a hard time about wanting to retire, even after coming back to help get a successor well situated?
      Well then, Tesla is and will be just fine.

    3. Re:Tesla Click bait mania seems to be abating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like most paid trolls have been reassigned

      who keeps track of paid trolls? another paid troll, that's who

    4. Re:Tesla Click bait mania seems to be abating by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Wrong. I am still being paid big money to troll Tesla articles on Slashdot. I literally make pennies per year on my efforts in behalf of "Big Oil", or the Saudis, or the legacy carmakers!

  30. Re:Lots of loose money at the top of the market, b by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

    How does the Ioniq compare to the Tesla Model 3? Hyundai have announced that they will increase the range a little on 2019 models, bringing it close to the mid range model 3, and a fully loaded one costs about the same as the Model 3 base price. No idea how these cars compare on room or trim, but the one thing Tesla still has going for it is their charging tech, which they got right the first time. Still, it looks like the mid range Model 3 already has some competition going...

    The Kona sits in a somewhat different market, the price is between the mid range and long range Model 3s. It is a very nice car (I did a test drive in one), and at the moment they are being snapped up by people who want longer range but cannot afford the much pricier long range Tesla 3. Delivery times already exceed 18 months in a country that Hyundai has given priority to. That's another thing to remember: Tesla produces more Model 3s in a month than the number of Konas Hyundai is expected to make in a year. Hyundai is expected to ramp up production a bit though... to about 1/5th of the Model 3 volume.

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  31. Re: So Rei is our official Tesla investment liaso by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

    Three times, actually. There was a profitable quarter before the run-up to Model 3.

    But yeah, it's mostly a sea of red ink so far.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  32. Re:Stock tanking by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

    Except for, you know, the reported GAAP profit.

    Can't find any more FUD, so now you just go for denial and lies?

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  33. Re: So Rei is our official Tesla investment liaso by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fun fact, this clown does not seem to understand either capital investment or amortization of assets and doesn't think that any company has generated profit until they have paid all of their long-term capital expenses.

    Funny, huh?

  34. Re:Stock tanking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shorts are gonna be shorts, expecting them to live in our world is really a stretch

  35. Re: So Rei is our official Tesla investment liason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She's a great source of one-sided Tesla info because she either works directly for the company as an astroturfer, or she's heavily invested in Tesla stock.

  36. Re:Lots of loose money at the top of the market, b by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
    These seem to be serious efforts by these companies.

    Earlier they were going for some sort of compromised compliance cars. First time they are seriously attempting to compete. They wisely are not taking Tesla head on, but try to find a niche where they can operate. That is the important thing.

    At the end of the day, if Tesla gets 20% of the world market for all automobiles, that would be immense, beyond the wildest imaginations of the most passionate supporters of Tesla. So even such a wildly pro Tesla scenario, 80% of the cars will be non Tesla. So other companies making serious attempts to make a good electric car should be encouraged.

    I am pro BEV. Of all makes.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  37. Re: So Rei is our official Tesla investment liason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody ever claimed they'd be bankrupt in a month.

    You are an idiot.

  38. Demand? by superdave80 · · Score: 1

    How is the demand side looking for Tesla? Out of curiosity, I went to the order page to see how long the wait is for a Model 3. The wait is.. none? What happened to the wait list of orders? Is this going to be an issue going forward, or do they see enough on demand orders to absorb their ramped up production?

    1. Re:Demand? by vipvop · · Score: 1

      Demand isn't there, you can find people really into hating on Tesla who take pics of lots full of cars sitting there, batteries probably being permanently damaged from the cold during the polar vortex.

      I think the early adopters (or rabid fan boys) already have their model 3s, but objective car buyers would probably do some research and see they're actually pretty shitty cars with incredibly poor service if you need parts / get in accident. I'm not pro or anti Tesla, I drove a friend's model S and it's fun to do burnouts in parking lots, but it reminds me of a ponzi scheme that will collapse if orders don't really pick up.

  39. Re: So Rei is our official Tesla investment liason by vipvop · · Score: 1

    I see you haven't looked into Solar City at all

  40. Re:Stock tanking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The accounting is fraudulent. That’s why their CFO jumped ship. He doesn’t want to go to prison along with felon musk.