Slashdot Mirror


Nest Secure Has an Unlisted, Disabled Microphone (androidauthority.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Android Authority: Owners of the Nest Secure alarm system have been able to use voice commands to control their home security through Google Assistant for a while now. However, to issue those commands, they needed a separate Google Assistant-powered device, like a smartphone or a Google Home smart speaker. The reason for this limitation has always seemed straightforward: according to the official tech specs, there's no onboard microphone in the Nest Secure system. However, Google just informed us that it is right now rolling out Assistant functionality to all Nest Secure devices via a software update. That's right: if you currently own a Nest Secure, you will be able to use it as a Google Home very soon. That means somewhere in the Nest Guard -- the keypad base station of the Nest Secure -- there might be a microphone we didn't know existed. Either that or your voice commands are going to be heard by another product (like your phone, maybe) but Assistant's output will now come from the Nest Guard, if you happen to be in the range of that device. UPDATE: Google has issued a statement to Android Authority confirming the built-in microphone in the Nest Guard base system that's not listed on the official spec sheet at Nest's site. The microphone has been in an inactive state since the release of the Nest Secure, Google says. This unlisted mic is how the Nest Guard will be able to operate as a pseudo-Google Home with just a software update.

10 of 207 comments (clear)

  1. unlisted microphone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    look, i just want a warm living room when i come home from work

    can we fuck off with this creeping and creepy featuritis?

    1. Re:unlisted microphone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      a 'smart' thermostat needs no camera, needs no microphone. needs no 'cloud' backing it up.. just a little locally run code, a source for local weather conditions, forecasts and date/time.. the national weather service and nist (and other countries' equivalents) provide those. for free.. with no creepy factor.

      anything that CAN run locally.. SHOULD be run locally. this cloud dependency simply for the sake of 'the cloud' (and data gathering) is total bullshit.

    2. Re:unlisted microphone? by Lab+Rat+Jason · · Score: 4, Funny

      What are the odds that a government, or other state sponsored entity already knew about this... and already updated your software?

      Asking for a friend...

      --
      Which has more power: the hammer, or the anvil?
  2. Some people buy hardware for what is not contained by bugnuts · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I will not buy a TV with a video camera.

    I'd be furious if I found out my TV had one, that only needed a software update to activate.

  3. The real question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is how many other devices have clandestine microphones unbeknownst to the owners?

    How can you trust anything from any of these tech companies. They all spy on you.

  4. Re: Creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Imagine a girlfriend? This is slashdot

  5. that's how they got nixon! by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 4, Funny

    that's how they got nixon!

  6. Slashdotters Need To Learn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Slashdotters need to learn and realize that the average consumer - read the vast vast majority of people - don't give a flying-rat-fuck about security or privacy. They care about shiny new toys and personal convenience and they do not care what the price.

    These major services/vendors have figured it out. They understand that they can do whatever the fuck they want, so long as it's convenient or shiny new for the end user. The end user/consumers gleefully hand over their money, their security, and their privacy to any and all of these companies for shiny new or convenient.

    You people worrying about microphones listening in, cameras recording activities, big data tracking your every fucking activity on a global scale, you're very much in the minority. The MASSIVE majority don't just fail to understand your odd and suspicious concerns, they are angered by your belligerent resistance to devices and services such as completely unnecessary $200 thermostats that track the consumer's habits, or Smart TVs that track viewership, feed targeted ads, and listen in on household conversations.

    To the rest of the world, you're a nutter deserving of scorn, ridicule, and ostracization.

  7. Re:Summary is biased. by gweihir · · Score: 4, Informative

    Tech specs, by their very nature, must list every major feature present. That list _must_ be complete. Anything major not listed must be absent. And the ability to record audio (even is "disabled" in software) is obviously a major feature in a device you put in your home. Also obviously, they do not list everything that is missing as that would be infeasible. For example, this device likely does not contain an ice-cream machine or a toilet roll holder either. Would you also expect that to be listed as absent?

    Do you see how wrong your statement is?

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  8. Re:better is no internet connection by bagofbeans · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You can't block the MAC on all your neighbours' wifi systems, and you can't stop the TV breaking the weakest password protection it finds.

    I remind about the Sony CD rootkit debacle.