Slashdot Mirror


Software Engineer Loses Life Savings in Quadriga Imbroglio (bloomberg.com)

Tong Zou wasn't a stereotypical crypto bro bent on accumulating flashy trophies such as Lamborghinis when he deposited his life savings into Quadriga CX's digital exchange. The 30-year-old software engineer, who'd been working in California for seven years, just wanted to save a few bucks on transfer fees after deciding to move to Vancouver. It proved to be a C$560,000 ($422,000) mistake. From a report: "It's all my savings, so I'm just living on what little I have left and trying to start over," Zou said in a phone interview Friday from Vancouver, where he has been living out of an AirBnB for the past month. "It pretty much took everything away from me." Zou is one of Quadriga's 115,000 clients who are out of luck after the sudden death of the firm's founder left C$190 million in cryptocurrencies protected by his passwords unretrievable. The exchange has halted operations and was granted protection from creditors on Feb. 5 in Nova Scotia Supreme Court in Halifax.

21 of 358 comments (clear)

  1. Sterotype much? by sinij · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "crypto bro bent on accumulating flashy trophies" ? Misandry much?

    1. Re: Sterotype much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hm, maybe fully deregulated commodities managed by a bunch of idiot tech bros was a bad idea?

    2. Re:Sterotype much? by sinij · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How about some consistency in your outrage? If sexism is bad, then all forms of it are bad?

    3. Re: Sterotype much? by mattyj · · Score: 5, Insightful

      De-regulated? Try never regulated. People invest in imaginary money at their own peril.

    4. Re:Sterotype much? by HarrySquatter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How is the word "bro" sexist and how is it even remotely the same as calling anyone a slut? I'm pretty sure lots of men would be surprised that they were being sexist when they call their friends "bros."

      You snowflakes are so adorable.

    5. Re:Sterotype much? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, the linked article can't even manage to be factually accurate at the most basic level. For example, Men are a majority now? Nope.

      There is no institutional bias against men? The author of the article has apparently never heard of schools, or universities, who literally advertise that they don't accept men for everything from scholarships to groups and centers paid for by male student fees.

      Oh man, and is this ever causing a problem. Males are a marked minority among college students https://www.theatlantic.com/ed... and getting worse.

      Very little attention ois being paid to this at the college level, I suspect that it is considered a little less of a problem for the victims - but it is the beginnings of a real problem. The path chosen for modern women is to get a degree, then work until your mid 30's early 40's, then find a husband and immediately start fertility treatments in order to have a child.

      But these ladies are having a problem finding a male that meets their expectation. To Google "where have all the good men gone brings up a plethora of results. Most often posed by women, discussed by women, and solutions proposed by women. And usually with a fine smattering of misandry.

      When in fact, the qualifications for a "good man" means a college education, having their own place, making more than her, and then there are the physical qualifications. Tall, handsome, ripped. Then there are the life choice demands, which are to be ready to immediately start fertility treatments in a race against the clock.

      Oh-ohhh, that college education demand. As we are nearing a 75 to 25 Percent female versus male degree status, right away we have a severe problem.

      Coupled with the other demands, these women are going to have a real problem finding mates. A male that fits their demands is probably not looking for a woman of that age and is not looking to become a father at such a late age.

      Probably the best article about the problem is https://www.dailymail.co.uk/fe...

      Even then, the article starts out: "Where have all the good men gone? These sassy, sophisticated, solvent women say they are struggling to find other halves that can measure up.

      No shit.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  2. Diversify your investment portfolio by alvinrod · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It doesn't matter what you're doing, but there is an old saying about not keeping all of your eggs in one basket. Sometimes even incredibly intelligent people are capable of horrible foolishness.

    1. Re:Diversify your investment portfolio by alvinrod · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's right but not relevant here. He wasn't do that not as an investment but as a temporary solution to an international move.

      It doesn't matter what you're doing. When I travel internationally, I never keep all of my cash in one location. Even though it's obviously not all of my assets, I try to make sure that no single adverse event leaves me up shit creek without a paddle. Same reasoning applies to important information, like your data, or the ability to access that data which is why this is a problem for more than just this one poor fool. It doesn't matter what the situation is, never have a single point of failure.

    2. Re:Diversify your investment portfolio by ibpooks · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Perhaps they aren't actually ripping you off on those fees... Maybe, just maybe, you're paying for the reliability and trustworthiness of a real financial institution. You know, the kind with backups and professionals and legal oversight.

      The real headline is "Chump tries to smuggle $500k across an international border, gets burned".

  3. Tax evasion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Because that sure sounds like a possibility. While he can't get the money back now, I hope the IRS and the Canadian equivalent are looking at this closely, since this is INTERNATIONAL commerce, not just interstate commerce, and deserves all the scrutiny it can get so people understand the consequences of flaunting the rules.

    Losing the money is bad, but having it publicized you were dodging taxes while fleeing the country in the process....

  4. So, trying to understand by forkfail · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He used this cryptocurrency in an attempt to get around the laws and banking regulations of the US and Canada, and now we're supposed to feel sorry for him?

    I mean, it's always sad when folks lose everything. But it's not like this guy was particularly innocent in what he was doing.

    --
    Check your premises.
    1. Re:So, trying to understand by ddtmm · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What was illegal about it? He purchased crypto with USD, then was going to sell it in CAD. That's perfectly legal and is a method used in buying/selling foreign stocks.

    2. Re:So, trying to understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      no, he's a dumb ass for moving half a million in one transaction.

    3. Re:So, trying to understand by bradley13 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You're perfectly right, if that is what he intended.\

      His is a strange story. He says he wanted to just use the exchange to transfer his money - all $500,000 at once. That's a really strange choice: he is going through a third currency, meaning two transactions rather than one. The fees are going to be much higher than just an ordinary bank-to-bank transfer, plus that third currency is extremely volatile, meaning he has a lot of additional risk.

      Then we have the "all your eggs in one basket" argument. With a traditional bank, that might not be a problem, but with an exchange? After Mt. Gox anyone in the IT world should understand that exchanges cannot be trusted. Multiple transactions, waiting for each one to go through before initiating the next. Or multiple exchanges. Or just leave his money in the US. Or his own offline wallet. Or, really, anything except what he actually did.

      tl;dr: His story doesn't pass the sniff-test. I'm not sure what he was really doing, but it seems very likely that he was trying to bypass official notice of the assets - either their departure from the US, or their arrival in Canada. I wonder: did he make this money with crypto-speculation? And, perhaps, had never paid taxes on it?

      OTOH: reality sometimes is stranger than fiction, and sometimes people really do just have brain farts...

      --
      Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
    4. Re:So, trying to understand by darkmeridian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But why didn't he just ACH his money directly from one bank account to another? Or write himself a check? As far as I know, those are both very low cost or no cost if they really want your business.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
  5. Cryptocurrency is like a history lesson by Kethinov · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I love how cryptocurrency is like a history lesson for Libertarians with regressive economic attitudes. They get to learn the hard way why each discrete financial regulation we have today was enacted.

    --
    You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
    1. Re:Cryptocurrency is like a history lesson by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1, Insightful

      They'll just blame everyone but themselves for their own stupidity; then when it happens to them they'll complain that the government is obviously at fault because all its regulation pushed people into the unregulated mess.

  6. He didn't say "investment" by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's right but not relevant here. He wasn't do that not as an investment

    It's incredibly relevant - he literally took all his eggs (money) and put them in one basket (Enquadrdriofomaligo or whatever it was called).

    It doesn't matter if the purpose was investment or short term transfer.

    Same reason why when traveling you would not get a bunch of travelers checks and keep them all in the same place. (not that anyone uses travelers checks anymore, but still).

    He was moving to Canada from the US and wanted to save money on conversion fees

    Unstated: also wanted to avoid Canadian taxes on said money.... and he paid the ultimate conversion fee instead.

    It's not that I don't feel somewhat sorry for him, but I think he was way more foolish than unlucky. "unlucky" is almost always just another way to say "didn't really think through possibilities".

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  7. Re:Not your keys? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Another thing is that QuadrigaCX by that point was known to sometimes take more than 2 months for a fiat currency withdrawal. So he went from USD to crypto to CAD in an attempt to save 2%.. but risks aside, he was looking at potentially leaving that $560,000 sitting with no means to invest it for 2 months. For someone knowledgeable to do such a thing, it would seem to me to really require a great distaste for allowing the banking system to take a cut (either that.. or if he chose to have the currency delivered to him as cash rather than wire transfer, then I suppose perhaps he was trying to hide the movement of money). The way I look at, I tend to have sympathy for whomever makes a mistake the first time.. and perhaps it was his first serious use of QuadrigaCX (and thus he wouldn't have known of the stress of waiting for a large amount to come through from them, with unknown timeline).

  8. Re:lol by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Deposited his life savings into Quadriga CX's digital exchange" were the stupidity keywords that convinced me not to feel sorry for him.

    After all of the Bitcoin exchanges that have failed over the past few years, why do people still DO this?

    TFS says he, "just wanted to save a few bucks on transfer fees" moving from CA to Vancouver, so he probably just intended to park the money for a very short time while he moved and found a new bank. Seems dumb in any case. Nerdwallet lists the average international bank wire fees at $45 outgoing and $13 incoming, so he risked $422K US to save $58. Cheaper still would have been to bring some cash, deposit a check to open a new account and use a CC for a bit. Some life lessons are hard, but "penny wise and pound foolish" doesn't have to be one of them.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  9. Re:lol by jythie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah, that is why I am really skeptical of they guy's story. If all he was really trying to do was save money on transfering between banks, transfering all his money into an exchange (which has a a fee), then finding enough sellers to convert nearly half a million dollars into crypto (which also has fees), then later find enough buyers to convert it back (more fees) and finally transfer it back to a bank? That makes zero sense unless he also believed it would be making money in the process.