Slashdot Mirror


Amy Klobuchar Calls For Net Neutrality 'Guarantee' In 2020 Presidential Announcement (dailydot.com)

Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) said she wanted to "guarantee" net neutrality for all Americans during her 2020 presidential campaign kickoff speech. "[T]he senator bringing it up in her announcement marked perhaps the most high-profile stage the issue has had in terms of recent presidential politics," reports The Daily Dot. From the report: The Minnesota senator brought up the issue among other technology platform goals, including privacy and cybersecurity. "Way too many politicians have their heads stuck in the sand when it comes to the digital revolution. 'Hey guys, it's not just coming. It's here.' If you don't know the difference between a hack and Slack, it's time to pull off the digital highway," she said. "What would I do as president? We need to put some digital rules of the road into law when it comes to people's privacy."

She added: "For too long the big tech companies have been telling you, don't worry, we've got your back," she said. "While your identities, in fact, are being stolen and your data is being mined. Our laws need to be as sophisticated as the people who are breaking them. We must revamp our nation's cybersecurity and guarantee net neutrality for all. And we need to end the digital divide by pledging to connect every household to the internet by 2022, and that means you, rural America."
Other Democrats seeking the 2020 nomination have shown support for net neutrality in the past. Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) tweeted late last month about reports suggesting that telecom investments have not risen since the FCC's controversial repeal of net neutrality, calling the decision "another handout to big corporations & telecom giants."

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) also told a crowd in Iowa last month that she believed "in net neutrality the same way I believe everybody should have access to electricity," according to the Washington Post.

4 of 161 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Define what you mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    That's a piss poor attempt at trolling..

  2. Not me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    I want the ISPs assets confiscated and given to the people! And then, the owner class will be enslaved and forced to dig the ditches for the new fiber that will paid for by their confiscated money!

    And then, we will live in a Socialist Utopia of free beer, free porn, and free internet!

  3. This the same woman by Crashmarik · · Score: 0, Troll

    That called for something to be done about global warming while standing in the middle of a snowstorm ?

  4. How is this not dirt simple to comprehend by SuperKendall · · Score: 1, Troll

    Would you please provide a cogent explanation of why paid prioritization is a good thing for consumers?

    Very simple: I would like to be able to pay some additional fee to designate traffic from any source of my choosing to be of higher priority than other traffic.

    To put that in simpler terms, I want Netflix to stream as fast as possible to the possible detriment of random browsing or other update traffic from my house.

    Why is it so hard to understand people would like to watch Netflix without skipping just because someone else in the house decided to visit Facebook? Or to be able to allocate enough of the pipe so that 4k delivery with a decent bitrate was practical at all times without having to pay for a faster connection for all traffic?

    There are tons of useful scenarios if you think for even a second. Please do not kill them over some abstract sense of purity.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley