Slashdot Mirror
Man With 3-D-Printed Gun Had Hit List of Lawmakers, US Says (nytimes.com)
A Dallas man was sentenced to eight years in prison on Wednesday after the authorities caught him with a partially 3-D-printed rifle and what federal prosecutors described as a hit list of lawmakers in his backpack. From a report: The man, Eric Gerard McGinnis, had been under a court order that prohibited him from possessing a firearm when he was discovered to have had the partially printed AR-15-style rifle in July 2017, according to a statement from the United States Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Texas. Mr. McGinnis, 43, was charged with possession of an unregistered firearm and possession of ammunition by a prohibited person, prosecutors said. A jury later convicted him on both counts.
Prosecutors said in their statement that police officers had arrested Mr. McGinnis after hearing three shots he had apparently fired in a wooded area just outside of Dallas. They also discovered a list in his backpack labeled "9/11/2001 list of American Terrorists." The list included the office and home addresses of "several federal lawmakers, both Democrat and Republican," the statement said. Prosecutors did not reveal the names on Mr. McGinnis's list, but at the sentencing hearing on Wednesday they disclosed that a forensic analysis of his electronic devices suggested that Mr. McGinnis "had a strong interest" in James T. Hodgkinson, the man who the authorities say shot and wounded Representative Steve Scalise and several others at a congressional baseball practice in June 2017.
Prosecutors said in their statement that police officers had arrested Mr. McGinnis after hearing three shots he had apparently fired in a wooded area just outside of Dallas. They also discovered a list in his backpack labeled "9/11/2001 list of American Terrorists." The list included the office and home addresses of "several federal lawmakers, both Democrat and Republican," the statement said. Prosecutors did not reveal the names on Mr. McGinnis's list, but at the sentencing hearing on Wednesday they disclosed that a forensic analysis of his electronic devices suggested that Mr. McGinnis "had a strong interest" in James T. Hodgkinson, the man who the authorities say shot and wounded Representative Steve Scalise and several others at a congressional baseball practice in June 2017.
I suspect this was a machined lower - possibly using a ghost-gunner.
CNC machines, while computer-controlled and similar in utility, are not really 3d printers. A 3d printer is generally an "additive manufacturing" device, whereas a CNC machine is subtractive.
Wow. Slashdot is a cesspool now.
You are mistaken.
https://www.atf.gov/firearms/qa/does-individual-need-license-make-firearm-personal-use
Does an individual need a license to make a firearm for personal use?
No, a license is not required to make a firearm solely for personal use. However, a license is required to manufacture firearms for sale or distribution. The law prohibits a person from assembling a non–sporting semiautomatic rifle or shotgun from 10 or more imported parts, as well as firearms that cannot be detected by metal detectors or x–ray machines. In addition, the making of an NFA firearm requires a tax payment and advance approval by ATF.
[18 U.S.C. 922(o), (p) and (r); 26 U.S.C. 5822; 27 CFR 478.39, 479.62 and 479.105]
https://www.google.com/search?q=laws+on+making+your+own+firearms&oq=laws+on+making+your+own+firearms&aqs=chrome..69i57j0.6230j0j8&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
In the US, under Federal law, it is legal to make a firearm for your own use. It has to be a firearm that is not regulated under NFA. This means it can't be fully automatic, a short barrel shotgun, a short barrel rifle, or a disguised gun of some sort.
You think incorrectly. It is illegal to 'manufacture' a firearm without a serial number, to possess an NFA firearm without a serial number, or to deface a serial number. But an older firearm that never had a serial number, or a gun you make yourself (yes, that is legal and is not considered 'manufacturing') does not need a serial number. As for traceability, if there's no registration, how is a serial number going to be traceable?
I"m a bit puzzled about the charge they convicted him of..."unregistered firearm".
I thought this was TX, and I don't believe you have to 'register' your firearms there, right?
Also, as the law stands federally and in most states, you can make your own firearms, and as long as they are not NFA items (short barreled shotgun, short barreled rifle, etc)....you do NOT have to serialize them, or register them or tell any government entity that you have built and own this weapon.
And for more firearms, like the AR platform...the only normally serialized part of the gun is the lower receiver....which you can 3D print, somewhat these days.
Anyway, with that in mind, I'm curious of the law they convicted him of on that front.
Now, as I understand it, he's not allowed legally to posses any firearm, and that's cool.....but I hope they didn't bend a law that's not applicable to convict him, that presents a dangerous precedent.
Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
It is not illegal to manufacture a firearm without a Serial. If you want to transfer that weapon to anyone else then it requires a serial. But you do not have to serialize any firearm you make for your own use. Also the Federal Law does not specify how it is to be serialized so many will just engrave random numbers on a weapon if they do decide to sell or transfer it.
I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
Wait... are you saying MAGA hat wearers are automatically considered guilty regardless of evidence, or are you saying MAGA hat wearers automatically consider others guilty regardless of evidence?
The former... At least in the press. Don't believe me? Google Covington and look at the news coverage. Those kids where literally just standing there with MAGA hats on, didn't do anything wrong and got raked over the coals in the press on the testimony of the actual aggressor, even after the full story came out. I hear they are planning to sue multiple people and media outlets over defamation and I hope they win.
In this particular case, the problem was that it was an unregistered short barreled rifle
Registration of those *is* required, even in Texas...
Show me on the 1st Amendment bobblehead where the moderator touched you...