Here's also what Wikipedia has to say about civil liberties and minors:
"Children are generally afforded the basic rights embodied by the Constitution, as enshrined by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Equal Protection Clause of that amendment is to apply to children, born within a marriage or not, but excludes children not yet born."
While they lack autonomy, they still have (at least some) civil rights. Which means the 4th amendment still applies. See New Jersey v. T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325, 333 (1985) (holding that the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures applies to searches conducted by public school officials); see also California v. Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621, 626-27 (1991) (implicitly recognizing Fourth Amendment rights of minors but finding no violation).
IP over Avian Carriers (IPoAC) was initially described in RFC 1149, released on April 1, 1990.
Waitzman described an improvement of his protocol in RFC 2549, IP over Avian Carriers with Quality of Service (1 April 1999). Later, in RFC 6214—released on 1 April 2011, and 13 years after the introduction of IPv6—Carpenter and Hinden published Adaptation of RFC 1149 for IPv6.
Your argument is that Microsoft being sued for anti-competitive behavior isn't a valid comparison because Apple is even *more* anti-competitive about it?
Apple makes a phone and sells music services on it.
Spotify could make a phone and sell music services on it too. But instead, it wants to JUST sell its music services, and ride on the coattails of someone else who bothers to make the hardware to make that possible.
On a related note...Spotify of course doesn't make the music either. It is just a middle man. It wants to connector creators and consumers, and charge a Spotify tax to SOMEBODY (either users who pay, or advertise), to make use of its marketplace. Sound familiar?
Microsoft makes an operating system and gives away a web browser with it. Netscape could make a computer operating system and give away web browsers too. But instead, it wants to JUST give away its web browser, and ride on the coattails of someone else who bothers to make the operating system to make that possible...
On a related note.... Netscape of course doesn't make the websites either. It is just a middle man...
You mean that news report that said how the average tax refund was lower than expected?
The one that they came back a week and two later and said "oh, wait, now that the IRS has caught up after the shutdown, the average tax refund is slightly higher"?
Or the one that forgot that your tax refund has absolutely no impact on what your tax burden is?
You only need to add a serial number if you sell/transfer the gun to someone else, or live in a shitty state that created it's own serial number requirements (*cough* California *cough*)
You can take it anywhere it's legal to take a firearm. It's perfectly legal to manufacture a firearm for personal use without a serial number provided you're not a licensed manufacturer...
What wasn't legal was making an unregistered Short-Barreled Rifle, or being a prohbited person in possession... which is what the perp *actually* did.....
Nope, didn't write that. Just thought it was odd you would claim someone's knowledge is shallow when you are seemingly confused over who manufactures the Ghost Gunner (or the fact that DD isn't the entire 80% industry, just the most publicly known example)
But since you seem very concerned with accuracy regarding DD, please enlighten me: who do *you* think manufactures the Ghost Gunner?
A short barreled rifle, as the name might suggest, is a rifle with a short barrel. To be more specific, it is a shoulder-fired, rifled firearm, made from a rifle, with a barrel length of less than 16 in (41 cm) or overall length of less than 26 in (66 cm), or a handgun fitted with a buttstock and a barrel of less than 16 inches length.
Much like sawed-off shotguns or machine guns, these sorts of firearms have extra regulations attached to their legal ownership: you must pay a $200 tax, pass an expanded background check, seek local law enforcement approval, etc...
As for why it matters enough to slap a bunch of extra restrictions on it.... your guess is as good as mine. Best theory is in the 1930s it was thought that rifles and shotguns were being sawed off by criminals for easy concealment for their use. Whether this was a response to real crime or just crime shown in the movies is open to argument. Oddly, the Supreme Court ruled that such short-barreled rifles weren't constitutionally protected due to them lacking a military usefulness.... (oddly, it is now the "military style" guns being targeted for extra restrictions...)
Mostly true: it *is* legal to sell a homebuilt firearm. Your original intent for making the firearm couldn't be to sell it, and you must add a serial number, but it can be otherwise legal to sell/transfer a homebrew gun...
Contradiction:
Did he have a partially "printed" (rather "milled") firearm or was it a completed one? If it was an incomplete firearm, how did he manage to fire it?
He printed the lower receiver, which is the controlled part of the rifle. He then completed assembling the rifle using commercially produced parts. Hence "partially printed" = not all the parts were 3D printed
Producing a firearm (milling the receiver) is not illegal (https://www.atf.gov/firearms/qa/does-individual-need-license-make-firearm-personal-use) - but possessing one is. He was convicted of illegal manufacturing among other things. Why?
The article doesn't say he was convicted of illegal manufacturing, but according to another article, he *was* convicted of possessing a unregistered Short-Barreled Rifle. Manufacturing an unregistered SBR is usually a separate offense.
Gasoline is a consumer product...
Post-it notes are a consumer product...
medication is a consumer product...
Cheap beer is a consumer product....
Crayola crayons are a consumer product...
Gillette razors are a consumer product...
Of the products Whirlpool sells in the U.S., it makes 80 percent in U.S. plants...
Slashdot Mirror
Here's also what Wikipedia has to say about civil liberties and minors:
"Children are generally afforded the basic rights embodied by the Constitution, as enshrined by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Equal Protection Clause of that amendment is to apply to children, born within a marriage or not, but excludes children not yet born."
While they lack autonomy, they still have (at least some) civil rights. Which means the 4th amendment still applies. See New Jersey v. T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325, 333 (1985) (holding that the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures applies to searches conducted by public school officials); see also California v. Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621, 626-27 (1991) (implicitly recognizing Fourth Amendment rights of minors but finding no violation).
IP over Avian Carriers (IPoAC) was initially described in RFC 1149, released on April 1, 1990. Waitzman described an improvement of his protocol in RFC 2549, IP over Avian Carriers with Quality of Service (1 April 1999). Later, in RFC 6214—released on 1 April 2011, and 13 years after the introduction of IPv6—Carpenter and Hinden published Adaptation of RFC 1149 for IPv6.
They literally just settled a lawsuit from last year about this: https://nationalfairhousing.or...
Your argument is that Microsoft being sued for anti-competitive behavior isn't a valid comparison because Apple is even *more* anti-competitive about it?
Apple makes a phone and sells music services on it.
Spotify could make a phone and sell music services on it too. But instead, it wants to JUST sell its music services, and ride on the coattails of someone else who bothers to make the hardware to make that possible.
On a related note...Spotify of course doesn't make the music either. It is just a middle man. It wants to connector creators and consumers, and charge a Spotify tax to SOMEBODY (either users who pay, or advertise), to make use of its marketplace. Sound familiar?
Microsoft makes an operating system and gives away a web browser with it. Netscape could make a computer operating system and give away web browsers too. But instead, it wants to JUST give away its web browser, and ride on the coattails of someone else who bothers to make the operating system to make that possible...
On a related note.... Netscape of course doesn't make the websites either. It is just a middle man...
Sound familiar?
You mean that news report that said how the average tax refund was lower than expected?
The one that they came back a week and two later and said "oh, wait, now that the IRS has caught up after the shutdown, the average tax refund is slightly higher"?
Or the one that forgot that your tax refund has absolutely no impact on what your tax burden is?
You mean Diana, Princess of Wales
She lost the title "Her Royal Highness", not the courtesy title of Princess of Wales...
Very true. For example: California passed AB 857 which requires all completed firearms to have a serial number applied by Jan 1, 2019
If it was made after that, then it's illegal to possess at all under 18 USC 922(o).
It's not illegal to possess a modern machine gun under certain circumstances. For instance: an FFL with a Class 3 SOT...
If he'd not been stupid, and just put a pistol brace on it, he'd have not gotten charged with that.
Well that kind of depends.... did he shoulder it?
:P
You only need to add a serial number if you sell/transfer the gun to someone else, or live in a shitty state that created it's own serial number requirements (*cough* California *cough*)
Civilians can certainly keep and bear a short barreled rifle. There's just extra regulations involved.... such as registration...
Which is why the perp wasn't convicted of possessing a short barreled rifle. He was convicted of possessing an *unregistered* short barreled rifle...
You can take it anywhere it's legal to take a firearm. It's perfectly legal to manufacture a firearm for personal use without a serial number provided you're not a licensed manufacturer...
What wasn't legal was making an unregistered Short-Barreled Rifle, or being a prohbited person in possession... which is what the perp *actually* did.....
Nope, didn't write that. Just thought it was odd you would claim someone's knowledge is shallow when you are seemingly confused over who manufactures the Ghost Gunner (or the fact that DD isn't the entire 80% industry, just the most publicly known example)
But since you seem very concerned with accuracy regarding DD, please enlighten me: who do *you* think manufactures the Ghost Gunner?
A short barreled rifle, as the name might suggest, is a rifle with a short barrel. To be more specific, it is a shoulder-fired, rifled firearm, made from a rifle, with a barrel length of less than 16 in (41 cm) or overall length of less than 26 in (66 cm), or a handgun fitted with a buttstock and a barrel of less than 16 inches length.
Much like sawed-off shotguns or machine guns, these sorts of firearms have extra regulations attached to their legal ownership: you must pay a $200 tax, pass an expanded background check, seek local law enforcement approval, etc...
As for why it matters enough to slap a bunch of extra restrictions on it.... your guess is as good as mine. Best theory is in the 1930s it was thought that rifles and shotguns were being sawed off by criminals for easy concealment for their use. Whether this was a response to real crime or just crime shown in the movies is open to argument. Oddly, the Supreme Court ruled that such short-barreled rifles weren't constitutionally protected due to them lacking a military usefulness.... (oddly, it is now the "military style" guns being targeted for extra restrictions...)
Mostly true: it *is* legal to sell a homebuilt firearm. Your original intent for making the firearm couldn't be to sell it, and you must add a serial number, but it can be otherwise legal to sell/transfer a homebrew gun...
It's not a huge industry. DD is barely afloat.
DD isn't the whole industry. Ask Polymer80 how well they're floating...
They sell 3D printer files via thumb drives at $10, only in the US (and some cool merch) and that's it.
Ghost Gunner is probably what you're thinking about and those are expensive with low volume sales.
You do realize that the manufacturer of the Ghost Gunner CNC machine is Defense Distributed... right?
Your knowledge is shallow.
Yours is apparently worse...
According to another article, it was an unregistered short-barreled rifle...
In this particular case, the problem was that it was an unregistered short barreled rifle
Registration of those *is* required, even in Texas...
Bingo: according to another article, he was convicted of possession of an unregistered SBR...
https://www.justice.gov/usao-n...
If the system works, why didn't anyone follow up on the prohibited person trying to buy a gun until he could already build his own?
Contradiction: Did he have a partially "printed" (rather "milled") firearm or was it a completed one? If it was an incomplete firearm, how did he manage to fire it?
He printed the lower receiver, which is the controlled part of the rifle. He then completed assembling the rifle using commercially produced parts. Hence "partially printed" = not all the parts were 3D printed
Producing a firearm (milling the receiver) is not illegal (https://www.atf.gov/firearms/qa/does-individual-need-license-make-firearm-personal-use) - but possessing one is. He was convicted of illegal manufacturing among other things. Why?
The article doesn't say he was convicted of illegal manufacturing, but according to another article, he *was* convicted of possessing a unregistered Short-Barreled Rifle. Manufacturing an unregistered SBR is usually a separate offense.
According to another article, the problem was "unregistered short barrel rifle"
https://www.justice.gov/usao-ndtx/pr/federal-jury-convicts-grand-prairie-man-firearm-charges
Perhaps they're just waiting for the heat to die down and those free credit-monitoring programs to expire before using the data....
Gasoline is a consumer product...
Post-it notes are a consumer product...
medication is a consumer product...
Cheap beer is a consumer product....
Crayola crayons are a consumer product...
Gillette razors are a consumer product...
Of the products Whirlpool sells in the U.S., it makes 80 percent in U.S. plants...