Slashdot Mirror


Opera Shows Off Its Smart New Redesign That's Just Like All the Other Browsers (arstechnica.com)

Opera has unveiled a major redesign for its browser that's expected to ship in version 59. As Peter Bright writes via Ars Technica, "the new appearance adopts the same square edges and clean lines that we've seen in other browsers, giving the browser a passing similarity to both Firefox and Edge." From the report: The principles of the new design? "We put Web content at center stage," the Opera team writes on its blog. The design is pared down so that you can browse "unhindered by unnecessary distractions." Borders and dividing lines have been removed, flattening out parts of the browser's interface and making them look more uniform and less eye-catching. The new design comes with the requisite dark and light modes, a welcome trend that we're glad to see is being widely adopted.

Being Web-centric is not a bad principle for an application such as a browser, where the bulk of the functionality and interest comes from the pages we're viewing rather than the browser itself. At first blush, I think that Opera has come up with something that looks good, but it does feel like an awfully familiar design rationale. [...] Opera plans to ship the R3 release in March, and a developer preview can be downloaded today to give the new appearance a spin. The new design isn't the only notable feature of R3; it also integrates a crypto wallet for Ethereum transactions. In conjunction with Opera on your phone, this feature can be used to securely make online payments to sites using Coinbase Commerce for their payment processing.

4 of 54 comments (clear)

  1. Lemmings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The design is pared down so that you can browse "unhindered by unnecessary distractions."

    Thank god, I love not being able to see the edges of tabs, etc.

    Why is the UI/UX world so full of fucking lemmings?

  2. Browser monoculture by xack · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not only are we using the same engines, we are sharing the same user interfaces. The web is worse off for it. We need diversity in browser engines and interfaces, but developers are too addicted to conformity.

    1. Re:Browser monoculture by nine-times · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't see a huge problem in mostly using the same engine if it's open source and being actively developed well. To some extent, you know... the point is to render HTML consistently. I understand the benefit of avoiding a monoculture, but it's better than web developers having to include a bunch of hacks in their sites to get their sites to render properly on each browser. Yeah, it'd be nice if there were different implementations with different approaches to keep things diverse, but if I were a developer I wouldn't want to spend my time reinventing the wheel when there's a perfectly good open-source wheel available.

      And I think part of the reason browsers are a bit stagnant and boring is, we just need to to render HTML. There's really not much room at the moment for interesting innovation. Just render the HTML securely, protect privacy, and block ads and annoyances. Frankly, they should probably be stripping things out. Static web pages shouldn't need to use as much resources as they do.

  3. Re:Visa Versa by Misagon · · Score: 5, Informative

    The current Opera browser and company behind it has very little left of the old Opera in it.
    The old core team left to develop Vivaldi.

    --
    "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley