Slashdot Mirror


James Cameron's Alita: Battle Angel Released After Sixteen Years (rottentomatoes.com)

Slashdot reader Drakster writes: Hollywood producer and writer James Cameron, who is best known for his first two Terminator films, Titanic, Avatar, and Aliens, has released his most recent film this week, Alita: Battle Angel, to mostly mixed to positive reviews. First announced in 2003, based on Yukito Kishiro's Gunnm manga series, it was stuck in development for several years, finally starting production in 2008. Slashdot last discussed this fifteen years ago, so now that it's finally here. For those who have seen it, what did you think? Met or surpassed your expectations, or not worth the wait?

78 of 140 comments (clear)

  1. Re:What's in a name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    No, you're a genius.

  2. Re:What's in a name by vux984 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "the heroine's name is ATILA spelled backwards?"

    And what pray tell is the significance of 'ATILA' ?

    Everything is something spelled backwards. Did anyone notice that captquark is krauqtpac spelled backwards! I mean its true... but so what?

    ALITA is also a near homophone for 'a liter', and if you take the i out it's ALTA which is sometimes an abbreviation for Alberta; and you can also rearrange the letters to "A TAIL" or "A LIT A" what's a lit "A" i wonder? :p

  3. Early screening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I went to see an early screening about 2 weeks ago in IMAX 3D. It's a fairly entertaining film. Probably the best 3D visual effects I have seen, vertigo inducing in parts. Without the 3D I imagine it would lose its entertainment value somewhat with some cliché scenes and gaps in the story. Good overall, I'd give it 7/10 in 2D and 9/10 in 3D

    1. Re:Early screening by Misagon · · Score: 2

      I've seen multiple reviewers say that this movie would be worth watching in 3D. It is unusual that a movie is enhanced by 3D in reality, and not the opposite. Where I live, most theaters are in Real-D projection which is utter crap. Only one has laser-IMAX 3D, but it is expensive.

      I have also heard that the movie would have felt a bit condensed, like they would have had deleted scenes that could have provided e.g. more character development.
      Therefore, there is a possibility that there would be an extended cut on BluRay, and I had been planning to wait for that. (or, if deleted scenes are only separate, there would probably be at least a fan-made cut from BluRay some day).
      I have waited sixteen years for this movie. I could wait three more months...
      But if there is a point to seeing it in 3D then maybe I will.

      --
      "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
    2. Re:Early screening by judoguy · · Score: 2

      I've seen multiple reviewers say that this movie would be worth watching in 3D. It is unusual that a movie is enhanced by 3D in reality, and not the opposite.

      Foster's Law states "If 3D makes your movie better, your movie sucks". Except surfing movies. A 3D surfing movie would be cool!

      --
      Peace is easy to achieve, just surrender. Liberty is much harder get/keep.
    3. Re:Early screening by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      If color makes your movie better...

      If hd makes your movie better.

      Etc.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    4. Re:Early screening by Mitreya · · Score: 1

      Foster's Law states "If 3D makes your movie better, your movie sucks". Except surfing movies. A 3D surfing movie would be cool!

      Next thing you'll be saying "If special effects make your movie better, your movie sucks".
      Entertaining special effects is not necessarily a bad thing though (when done properly and in moderation)

    5. Re:Early screening by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

      OMG if Warren Miller had had 3D for his SKIING movies . . .

  4. Not Director by mentil · · Score: 4, Informative

    James Cameron is probably better known for directing films than for writing or producing them. Alita: Battle Angel was directed by Robert Rodriguez, not Cameron. The last thing Rodriguez directed that wasn't critically panned was the original 'Sin City'.

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    1. Re:Not Director by ckatko · · Score: 1

      Planet Terror was amazing.

    2. Re:Not Director by Drakster · · Score: 1

      Agreed, but I figured putting director in body would imply he had directed it, so I neglected it.

  5. It was OK, not great by bazorg · · Score: 2

    The first posts on the 15 year old Slashdot article linked here suggest something darker and more interesting than what I watched last weekend.
    This Alita was a remix of Pinocchio, Ben Hur and a few others. It looked very well made but to me it didn't feel really new. I'm just too old compared to the target audience, I guess.

    1. Re:It was OK, not great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, the headline is also wrong. The movie was announced as early as the late 90's.
      It was the times of Netscape Navigator and Altavista when battleangelalita.com redirected to FOX.
      Debian was pretty much equivalent with dependency hell.

      The rumor back then was that Dark Angel was a test run to see how action female in post apocalyptic setting was received.

      I don't think the movie has a target audience anymore. Cameron is a fanboy and convinced FOX to grab the rights for it. Then he did other movies instead of this one.
      The target audience is who we were 20 years ago but everyone has moved on. (That they brought in Jennifer Connelly should be proof enough that they aimed the movie at an audience that requires a time machine to see it.)

      It is no surprise that it didn't feel new. The manga is filled to the brim with references to popular culture, but those ages. Now they are just references to 80's and 90's popular culture.
      Some characters had interesting twists, but since then they have become tropes.
      I have yet to see it but I suspect the movie is just too late.

    2. Re:It was OK, not great by Creepy · · Score: 1

      So are most critics, apparently. The first article I saw gave it 1 1/2 stars and said it was a mess. Rotten Tomatoes was in the 60% range for critics last I checked. Audiences liked it about 97%, but I suspect that was mostly fanboys and fangirls doing the review and in a few days that will drop. I'm always a little torn with movies like this - on one hand, I'm often craving good Sci-Fi or Fantasy and on the other hand Cameron, Bruckheimer and Bay just don't do it for me. Avatar was hippie shit and IMO the last good thing Bruckheimer and Bay put out was Bad Boys (and the sequel sucked). My wife liked Coyote Ugly (it was mediocre at best), but I haven't been able to stand a single movie of theirs since then. King Arthur? Yuck. G-Force? WTF is this?!?! The Lone Ranger? Blech. 12 Strong? Great cast, terrible movie. I'd rather watch Uwe Boll and that is not a compliment and I'm not kidding.

  6. Impressed by Drakster · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Just got back from watching it, submitting the story before I did.

    Overall, I was very impressed with it. When seeing the first teaser, I’ve got to say, the eyes of the lead was a bit much, but coming back from seeing the entire film, they ended up blending in very well, not at all being the distraction I thought they could be.

    From the current review score, expected a generic Sci-Fi movie, but it surpassed my expectations, having good characters, story, setting, and action. Due to the nature of the story, had a good deal more heart to it as well.

    Been a while since I’ve read it but diverts from the source material a bit, but overall, it's a faithful adaptation of the first few volumes.

    I’d recommend it for any Sci-Fi fan.

    1. Re:Impressed by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The trailer made the CGI on Alita look very, very fake... But I hear that they either fixed it or it's just a lot less noticeable in the actual movie. Looking forward to seeing it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:Impressed by del_diablo · · Score: 2

      So when Gally opens her eyes you can react with 'Am i kawaii uguu?' like its out of some kind of terrible moe anime with overblown eyes and petite bodies. It still looks very very fake. But as you go in and watch, you get to see it in motion which fixes 90% of the issues within seconds.
      And the movies goes all in with motion, escalating it in a visually pleasing way. From walking, eating, running, acrobatics, martial arts to gymnastic to Motorball. And each escalation works to let the audience forget the uncanney valley, and just admire the fluid motion.

    3. Re:Impressed by Zocalo · · Score: 2

      It's also the things that seems to have got a lot of people tied up in knots over sexualisation, etc. so it's good it's not as bad as first made out. To be fair to Cameron, she's supposed to be an anime character where big eyes are the norm and also not entirely human so in context a deliberate giveaway like that vs. an actual human might be something her creators might do. It's a tough call; faithful to the original visual material and avoids any petty boycotts by fans who were expecting a faithful reproduction of her look, but I suspect he knew going in that it was going to get at least some flack. I wonder how much of the decision ultimately came down to weighing up the odds on profit vs. politically correct though - especially given that even bad PR on the PC angle is still PR, right?

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    4. Re:Impressed by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well her look was a deliberate choice in the manga, part of the whole "battle angel" concept where she is kind of a variation on the "born sexy yesterday" trope. A bit more "born cute yesterday" perhaps, but also a military grade ninja like Quorra from Tron Legacy, Leeloo from The Fifth Element, or maybe even Thor from the Marvel movies.

      It's interesting that Hollywood finally managed to translate a manga into a half decent live action movie. I can't think of a single one that wasn't terrible before.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:Impressed by Zocalo · · Score: 1

      It does sound like it. I'm also curious to see whether China's latest attempt to go the other way and produce a Hollywood-style live-action sci-fi blockbuster is going to pan out in the west. Initial impressions of "The Wandering Earth", an adaptation of a novel by Cixin Liu, seem a lot more favourable than their previous efforts, so it's looking promising, and it took in $443m within China in less than 10 days, apparently, although it's only got a fairly limited international release so far. Anything that breaks the stale same-old-rehashed-crap-with-better-FX movies Hollywood keeps pumping out is fine by me, even if it is badly dubbed and/or subtitled.

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    6. Re:Impressed by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I think it will be hard for them. Look at Japan, been producing great movies for decades, but apparently western audiences have issues with both subtitles and dubbing. About the closest Japanese movies have come are some Studio Ghibli dubs by Disney.

      With the current propaganda war against China and other cultural issues I think it will be hard for that movie to do well in the west, but we can hope. More likely is a Hollywood remake, in the long running tradition that includes things like Seven Samurai, The Ring and countless others.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:Impressed by Drakster · · Score: 1

      If you're referring to the body, you can blame the editor for that. See my original submission for a grammatically correct version.

    8. Re:Impressed by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      To be fair to Cameron, she's supposed to be an anime character where big eyes are the norm

      If you want to be fair to Cameron, then you're going to have to say that he's got no imagination. Where are the original concepts? Nowhere. America is down to knocking off Japanese cartoons because its own cartoons have already been knocked off, and there was no need for this movie no matter what country it was made in, to boot.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re: Impressed by LaszloKerekes · · Score: 1

      Or maybe she's 300 years old and the last of her kind a remnant of the earth/Martian wars, hailing as the most advanced cyborg from the Mars technocracy, the doctor Ido finding her head intact in a garbage rubble attaches it to a cybirg body he had first built for his now deceased daughter

    10. Re:Impressed by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2

      The (original) Day the Earth Stood Still has intelligent dialog and social commentary.

      In any case, as Roger Ebert said, judge movies based on what they are trying to do, not what you wished they were.

      Most sci-fi is action or horror. Perhaps this is your complaint against science fiction, like a junior high English teacher.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    11. Re:Impressed by The+Rizz · · Score: 1

      It's interesting that Hollywood finally managed to translate a manga into a half decent live action movie. I can't think of a single one that wasn't terrible before.

      Edge of Tomorrow?

    12. Re:Impressed by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      "that wasn't terrible"

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    13. Re:Impressed by denzacar · · Score: 2

      Sorry... Edge of Tomorrow was actually good.
      In fact, it was better written than the original book or manga... which have issues with finding an ending and some of its fan service.

      It also managed to create a coherent story while not having to spell it out for the audience.
      The time travel, the technology, why is it all happening... while leaving all the elements in there, for audience to piece it together.
      Like the whole Alpha-Omega thing in the end which doesn't have to be explained with technobabble for the audience to get it - unlike all that crap with servers and antennae and author's ideas how wi-fi works, in the manga/book.

      The movie is so good, one can forget for a while what a piece of narcissist crap Tom Cruise is in real life.
      Though, he is a good actor. But he doesn't really succeed in coming off as an empathic human being in every movie.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    14. Re:Impressed by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      To be fair it wasn't that bad... But Tom Cruise ruined it for me, I can't watch anything with him in it now.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    15. Re:Impressed by denzacar · · Score: 1

      Frankly, I'm more comfortable with his flavor of mental issues and moral flaws than with those of James Woods and Adam Baldwin.
      Never really was much of a Firefly fan, but I'm sure gonna miss all those charming assholes Woods managed to ruin retroactively.

      Watching Cruise I at least don't feel like I'm being shoved someone's toxic worldview down my throat...
      Well... apart from that whole "everything revolves around ME-ME-ME" thing.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    16. Re:Impressed by Cipheron · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure about the health of Japan's live action film industry as you seem to be. Anime is doing great in both sub and dub, with Japanese live action not doing anywhere near as well.

      As for Japanese live-action adaptations of anime and manga, well ... there aren't really any of them that seem to be praised, except for ones based on real-life romantic comedy stuff.

  7. Re:What's in a name by Zocalo · · Score: 4, Interesting
    "Atil*l*a the Hun" has two "L"s.

    As to why the name "Alita" was actually chosen, a quick Google provides a pretty good clue:

    Alita (Ah-lee-tah) is a common name in Spain. Derived from the latin "elite," meaning special. A variation of the name is Elita, (EE-lee-tah) or (El-lee-tah). The English meaning is "Winged". Alternatively the French meaning is "Noble" or "Chosen One".

    So, "elite", "special", "noble", and "chosen one", which form a much more blatant literary connection to the arc of the eponymous character in the film than a tenuous and almost certainly entirely coincidental reversal of letters to a mispelling of a historical figure.

    --
    UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
  8. Re: What's in a name by sysrammer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Alita bita Monica in my life,
    Alita bita Erica by my side,
    Alita bita Rita is all I need,
    Alita bita Tina is what I see...

    --
    His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
  9. Gunm: Battle Angel Alita by del_diablo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I disagree.
    Unlike something terrible like Ghost in Shell or Dragonball? Alita doesn't do a 1:1 adaption if that is what you mean. So we skip over the magical girlfriend arc that Alita started around, various enemies got mashed together, Motorball arc was rushed ahead and radically altered. Dr Nova even shows up to have a dragging angle to stage a sequel, even if his location and job seem to be altered drastically. If movie 2 skips over the Wasteland revolution arc in favor of the Tiphereth madness i will also be sad. Mostly because we will miss out of cloning, bodyjacking and marriage sheenigans.

    As for what is enjoyable?
    We got a movie where Motorball is the bloodsport it is, and so is Bounty Hunting. Alita's literal lust for blood also survived the adaption.
    And junkyard is the shithole its suppose to be.
    Its a great movie.

    What i find most terrible about the adaption is that you get exposition being replaced by Hollywood language. Pacific Rim do suffer the same, but its far more blatant when you have read the orignal script and seen how its replaced. Pacific Rim also has a far simpler exposition, meaning easier to make it terrible and yet not too Hollywood.
    In Alita a lot of the exposition sounds like terrible injokes to make fun of the characters ignorance. The Fall is a good one, because by the time Alita is around they have gone trough at the least 3. Yet the Hollywood script sounds like they are poking fun at each other for ignorance.
    Father/daughter relationship didn't survive the language that well.
    There is also some questionable changes, like she being named Gally until she remembers her name is Alita. Which seem a straight error by using the Viz translation instead of the source material. Tiphereth vs Salem is another one, which is easier to be indifferent to.

    1. Re: Gunm: Battle Angel Alita by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Guillermo needs to be shot in the forehead with an airsoft gun for that unbelievably retarded dual-pilot horseshit.

    2. Re:Gunm: Battle Angel Alita by denzacar · · Score: 1

      I'm a huge fan of the manga... Waited for the movie since it was announced that Cameron bought the movie rights, as it was known already that he is a fan...
      And I can't get myself to watch it.

      Basically, when Cameron passed the project on to Rodriguez it was obvious this will not be anything like the story in the manga.
      It may LOOK like it... here and there...
      But Rodriguez is neither a fan who'd keep it all kinda there by simply sticking to a 1:1 adaptation - nor is he intellectual enough to read, understand and adapt the subtleties of the story.

      As for motorball...
      In the manga it is all about self-discovery and self-actualization by reaching one's ultimate potential in a battle with the Universe which dictates that you can't win, break even or get out of the game.
      And liberating oneself by reaching for and achieving the "freedom to".

      To see anything like it in a movie, I'd advise going to the source - 1975 Rollerball.
      There it is more about individualism as a solution... but it is just a metaphor for that same self-actualizing battle with the world.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  10. Re:What's in a name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It was speculated it is derived from Aelita, queen of Mars
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aelita

    CYA

  11. Re:What's in a name by Zocalo · · Score: 1

    Yep, you're right; brainfart on my part. Point still stands though.

    --
    UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
  12. This movie is underwhelming by Quakeulf · · Score: 4, Interesting

    First of all, they tone it all down to fit the lowest age rating the board could decide on, which means the only connection this movie has to the comic is mostly in name only. In the comic, Ido kills for the thrill of it, and he goes hunting with Alita, and they bond in a lot of ways that shows how their sort of weird relationship is growing, and evolving.

    Admittedly the comic itself is not the best story-wise, but at least it has interesting characters. Again, since they toned it down the characters are lame, and the cast of Waltz as Ido would be perfect if he got to be the Ido that was in the comic, not this chained-to-the-wall imitation we see on the screen because THEY GOT TO KEEP IT PG-13.

    I could go on forever about this, but let me just say I am not that impressed. They should have gone Deadpool on this and stick to the source material. It has better designs, better character portrayals, and is better overall for this kind of silly sci-fi.

    1. Re:This movie is underwhelming by johnsie · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nobody gives a fuck about the comic other than nerdy teenage boys

    2. Re:This movie is underwhelming by johnsie · · Score: 1

      Yeah, there was a lot of violence and some bad language. The low rating was probably more due to lack of sex and drug usage and/or the C word.

    3. Re:This movie is underwhelming by Quakeulf · · Score: 1

      When it comes to total amount of enjoyment from a movie, Rampage with Dwayne Johnson did more for me than Alita.

    4. Re:This movie is underwhelming by Megane · · Score: 1

      I got to see the second half of Rampage. It was surprisingly good for such a throwaway idea.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    5. Re:This movie is underwhelming by Quakeulf · · Score: 1

      It had the kind of silly charm Alita didn't have. Dwayne going "this is a big arm, don't fight it" as he chokes a soldier was better than all the dialogue in Alita, and the comic did have a few funny lines they did not transfer to the movie.

    6. Re:This movie is underwhelming by Quakeulf · · Score: 1

      In the comic the first Desty Nova-creation Alita faces is a maggot that eats human brains. Hugo rips people's spines out. It gets really nasty and gory.

    7. Re:This movie is underwhelming by philmarcracken · · Score: 1

      Your comment has made me ditch the film and just decide to read the manga in jap. I fucking hate all ages bullshit, its gotta be coming from marketing dept. suits that want to 'target a wider audience' at the expense of the story.

    8. Re:This movie is underwhelming by Cipheron · · Score: 1

      "teenage"? The manga came out in 1990. no teenager is even aware of it's existence. Troll failed.

    9. Re:This movie is underwhelming by Cipheron · · Score: 1

      ... And even then, western teenagers were barely aware of Dragonball until 1996 or so. Probably a number approximating 0% of 1990s teens knew about Alita.

  13. Re: Can't say it does the source material justice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's not Hollywood, maybe it's the target audience. If Hollywood was making the movie ONLY for manga/anime fans, they would focus heavily in that direction. If they want to make it for everyone, they Americanize it. They change things that may please the fans but puzzle the non-fans. The question is whether they can do that and still make it enjoyable for everyone to watch.

  14. Re:What's in a name by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else notice the heroine's name is ATILA spelled backwards?

    And? Alita is french for "chosen one". It's also a very common spanish girls name. What do you think about that krauqtpac (which as we all know is just a phrase used to summon dark demons).

  15. Great Imax experience by Ecuador · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So, it was a great Imax experience - if you have a Giant Imax screen near you (not those small Imax Digital ones), like the 26m wide Laser Imax I had close to me, the way it looks alone is worth the admission. I don't like 3D in general, but this was actually shot in 3D so it looks good overall and the action sequences are gripping and well shot.
    Now, the story is not very "original" nowadays, as we've seen a lot along similar lines these days. A friend asked me if it is a bit derivative to things like Ghost in the Shell - I had to point out the original manga was contemporary to the Ghost in the Shell manga, so you can't say it came a lot later. And in general this movie it is not very close to the manga (which I guess might be a good thing for the general audience - bad for those who like manga/anime).
    But overall I would recommend just for the giant Imax screens which make it a great spectacle, for a small screen it is just a decent sci-fi but nothing to write home about...

    PS. The part-CGI character is not annoying/uncanny at all - it helps that it is supposed to by a cyborg anyway and that cgi is more advanced than 15 years ago when this was first discussed on /.

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
  16. Re:What's in a name by mjwx · · Score: 1

    "the heroine's name is ATILA spelled backwards?"

    And what pray tell is the significance of 'ATILA' ?

    Everything is something spelled backwards. Did anyone notice that captquark is krauqtpac spelled backwards! I mean its true... but so what?

    ALITA is also a near homophone for 'a liter', and if you take the i out it's ALTA which is sometimes an abbreviation for Alberta; and you can also rearrange the letters to "A TAIL" or "A LIT A" what's a lit "A" i wonder? :p

    It's also Spanish for "wing" as in "alitas de pollo" (chicken/buffalo wings)... Possibly could be a clue there.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  17. Re:No useless SJW n1ggers by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

    or other shitty minorities?

    Yes... Let the hate flow through you.

    --
    "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  18. Re:What's in a name by fat+man's+underwear · · Score: 1

    Alita is french for "chosen one".

    Not in the french I speak... It's not even a word, the closest would be a word meaning bedridden or "forced bed rest".

  19. Re:Can't say it does the source material justice.. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    Foreign movie directors are just as bad as getting American Culture correct too.
    Heck look at Doctor Who. When ever there is an American, there is some guy with a Gun, usually overly confident and rude.
    If they take American Stories, they will rewrite them so it matches the culture of the country involved.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  20. its not marvel by fluffythedestroyer · · Score: 1

    no superheroes, no spandex, not marvel or dc movie ?... what the hell ?

  21. Re:Can't say it does the source material justice.. by lgw · · Score: 1

    They suck at understanding nerd culture to an extreme degree.

    Anime is not made for nerds in the first place. It's just Japanese TV, made for a broad audience. Most is aimed at either teen girls or teen boys (thus the appeal to basement-dwelling manchildren).

    Like TV anywhere, there are some real gems among the dross. Hollywood fails at adapting almost everything with a fan base, never bothering to understand what people liked in the first place. The exceptions are very rare indeed (and made quite a lot of money): the Marvel movies, especially the early ones; the LOTR movies, though they went downhill as Jackson added more of his own BS to each in turn. I'm struggling to think of a third example from the past 50 years - Fight Club maybe.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  22. Re:Can't say it does the source material justice.. by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    And yet somehow he has the top TWO highest-grossing movies of ALL time. Gee, I wish I could "fail" like that! /s

    Since you are "obviously" such a talented director with a "proven" track record what was he supposed to have done differently in your "professional" opinion?

    What have you produced aside from bitch about Quantity != Quality, criticize without offering ANY details, or worse offer no solutions?

    And while stuff like Avatar is basically a modern rip-off of Dances with Wolves in space what he has produced has resonated very well with the general populace in spite of him producing "nothing but shit" as you claim. Was Avatar formulaic? Yes, extremely derivative. Did it have archaic tropes of "Might makes right"? Yeah, it was another dumb action "shootout at the O.K. coral in space." However, it sounds like you are jealous of his financial success, think that the _other_ types of success are the ONLY ones that matter, and don't see the value of his movies contents raising the consciousness of what is possible. Specifically, in Avatar there was social commentary on the blatant greed with unsustainable strip mining ("unobtainium"), plants having feelings and emotions, plants effectively forming a planet wide brain due to the large quantity of neuron connections (IIRC Grace Augustine commented on this), everything is connected a.k.a. Gaia Theory ("Eywa"), OBEs, and the future ability to transfer consciousness from one body to another. It sounds like you weren't paying ANY attention to the deeper narratives being presented.

    Movies often are multi-dimensional. Do you even understand the difference between the literal story and the allegory??

    Instead of just whining about Cameron producing "nothing but shit", in your opinion, why don't you actually have a discussion on WHY you think Cameron sucks -- or are you just too fucking lazy and intellectually dishonest to even attempt that?

  23. Re:Can't say it does the source material justice.. by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 2

    Speaking of LOTR, Peter Jackson, and The Hobbit (which I 100% agree with you) -- have you seen Lindsay Ellis' excellent 3 part documentary analyzing what went right (and wrong) with The Hobbit?

    https://youtu.be/uTRUQ-RKfUs

    I think you'll enjoy it -- it summarizes basically all the same criticisms I had with The Hobbit movie adaption.

  24. Re:What's in a name by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    Imma kick u in the krautpac.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  25. Worth the wait by hillbluffer · · Score: 1

    Rodriguez did the same thing he did with "Sin City". Many of the frames looked so much like the manga, it brought tears to my eyes. I've been waiting to see this version of Gally and was not disappointed (except for the ending!).

  26. Re:What's in a name by iampiti · · Score: 1

    I don't know who wrote that source but I can tell you that the only common use of "alita" in Spain is as a diminutive of "ala" (wing). Example sentence: "Alita de pollo" (chicken wing).
    As for it being a name I haven't ever met anyone named "Alita" or any place for that matter.
    Of course, it the source ment to refer to Spanish spekaing countries that might be true in some of them

  27. Re:What's in a name by mysticgoat · · Score: 1

    It's also Spanish for "wing" as in "alitas de pollo" (chicken/buffalo wings)... Possibly could be a clue there.

    A manga about buffalo wings? That is a strange sauce indeed.

  28. Re: Can't say it does the source material justice. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    I don't see how taking something popular with nerds then squatting all over them, leading to terrible reviews and word of mouth, seems like a good thing to deep pocket investors.

    Are you sure you aren't just a troll?

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  29. Re:What's in a name by TomR+teh+Pirate · · Score: 1

    I lol'd, especially when I realized that we could be talking about A LITA of cola. If Super Troopers somehow how make it into the movie, then the significance will be profound indeed.

  30. Re: What's in a name by radarskiy · · Score: 1

    Manga No. 5

  31. Re:Can't say it does the source material justice.. by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

    Mod parent up. And let's add the more obvious and more practical lesson that "All our past imperialism and land/resource grabs from indigenous peoples looked like THIS EVIL from the other side", before we list the speculative possibilities.

  32. Re:Can't say it does the source material justice.. by lgw · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I was surprised how much the problem with the Hobbit were direct studio interference. But then, it's only one sign of a great many that Hollywood has lost touch with viewers.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  33. Re:Can't say it does the source material justice.. by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

    >>> American, with a gun, overly confident and rude

    You mean "overpaid, oversexed, and over here"? Well, yeah.

  34. Re:Can't say it does the source material justice.. by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

    Yup, you gotta laugh at the irony!

    AC: Cameron produces shit!
    Me: WHY?

    And *I* get modded Flamebait. Yup, let's shoot the person asking for clarification. Stay classy /. !

    Moderation should eventually fix this knee-jerk slashtard abuse. (If it doesn't then its just another sign of how broken moderation has become.)

    C'est la vie.

  35. Re:What's in a name by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    It's not even a word

    Indeed it's not, It's a name. Depending on the age of the French name it either meant "chosen one" or more recently "winged". Not to dissimilar from the Spanish name whose meaning is "noble" which is not surprising given Romance languages share a lot of similarities.

  36. Re:Can't say it does the source material justice.. by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

    > Do you really think Avatar, Jurassic World 2, Incredibles 2, and Fast & Furios 14 are anywhere as good, impactful, or significant as Jaws, Star Wars, ET, The Lion King, etc.?

    Quit trying to move the goal posts. The OP argument was "Cameron produces shit." I called the AC out with "WHY?"

    Getting this back on topic: Were you not paying ANY attention to the impact of Avatar??? Despite having a shallow story it definitely had a social impact:

    1. "Avatar depression" shows lots of people were effected -- can you name any other movie that had this effect?
    2. It's high box office performance is proof that A LOT people went to see it, and
    3. As a result it got a lot people talking about the environment, sustainability, and how we are currently (mis)managing the planet in the name of greed.

    Avatar had a deeper layer to it. The "tech" angle is a red herring to its popularity. People who say Avatar was shit are generally clueless about its META narrative as I discussed before.

    SW:TLJ, ranked at #11, proof that Quantity != Quality, ALSO got lot of people talking -- specifically at how shitty it was. There have been numerous YouTube reviews dissecting and analyzing it to death such as Maulers, Wisecrack , MisAnthro Pony, etc. It ALSO had an impact on Han Solo and FUTURE Star Wars movies in the franchise. i.e. This one movie potentially killed Star Wars for good -- MANY fans have given up on Disney.

    > gross sales don't mean shit

    Doesn't change the fact that popular movies are having an impact on culture and on what kind of (future) movies get made. Usually, formulaic ones. :-/ So yeah, popular movies "matter."

    The real question is: Will any of these popular movies have any LASTING impact? That remains to be seen. Most of them will probably be forgotten in 40 years as most of them are shallow, mindless violence with little substance.

    For convenience here is a list of the movies:

    1. Avatar, $2,787,965,087
    2. Titanic, $2,187,463,944
    3. Star Wars: The Force Awakens, $2,068,223,624
    4. Avengers: Infinity War, $2,048,359,754
    5. Jurassic World, $1,671,713,208
    6. The Avengers, $1,518,812,988
    7. Furious 7, $1,516,045,911
    8. Avengers: Age of Ultron, $1,405,403,694
    9. Black Panther, $1,346,913,161
    10. Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows â" Part 2, $1,341,511,219
    11. Star Wars: The Last Jedi, $1,332,539,889
    12. Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom, $1,309,484,461
    13. Frozen, $1,290,000,000
    14. Beauty and the Beast, $1,263,521,126
    15. Incredibles 2 film currently playing, $1,242,808,192

    The argument was NEVER "Popular movies good" but I provided a counter argument to "Avatar is shit and has no impact".

    > are anywhere as good

    Who claimed they were good???

    Did you ignore the part where I said:

    Was Avatar formulaic? Yes, extremely derivative.

  37. Hello Apophenia, my old friend... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    Apophenia is the tendency to mistakenly perceive connections and meaning between unrelated things.[1]

    Originally, character's name was Gally.
    Name was changed during translation in order "to appeal to more than just the hard-core manga and anime crowd".

    https://www.animenation.net/bl...

    Actually, the discrepancy between the names Gally and Alita comes courtesy not of AD Vision, but from Viz.
    In the October 1993 issue of Animerica, Fred Burke, co-translator for the Viz Comics Battle Angel Alita manga explains that, "For a Viz Comic to work, it's got to appeal to more than just the hard-core manga and anime crowd;" therefore there were several alterations made in the translation of the manga.
    Yukito Kishiro's title Gunnm, a compound of Gun Dream, was re-named Battle Angel Alita.
    Gally, the protagonist, had her name changed to Alita, a name, Burke explains, means "noble": a name that he discovered while searching through a book of baby names.
    Burke also explains that, for no reason given, the floating city Zalem was re-named Tiphares: a name meaning "beauty", taken from the Qabalah and the mystical Tree of Life.
    Furthermore, Yugo's name was given a cosmetic change to Hugo for American readers.

    Also...
    https://web.archive.org/web/20...

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  38. Favorite manga by Cipheron · · Score: 1

    Gunnm is actually one of my favorite mangas of all time (Yokohama Kadaisho Kikou being the other one). I'm going to see Alita in about and hours time at the local cinema, and apparently they have Masaaki Yuasa's 2018 movie playing too so I guess I'll see that tomorrow too.

    I kinda need to see it, just hope that they didn't mess it up too bad. Also, it's promising that they changed the English title around from "Battle Angel Alita" to "Alita: Battle Angel". This implies they're leaving things open for sequels and they're not going to try and cram all 9 books (of the original story run) into a 2-hour runtime or anything dumb like that.

  39. Re:Can't say it does the source material justice.. by Cipheron · · Score: 1

    Blade Runner, perhaps? There are probably more novel-based examples than anything that can be seen as successful film adaptations.

  40. Re: What's in a name by sysrammer · · Score: 1

    +1 funny and/or insightful.

    --
    His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
  41. Re:Can't say it does the source material justice.. by pnutjam · · Score: 1

    Western Directors don't even understand Western Anime...
    See Avatar.

  42. MINOR SPOILER... by PortHaven · · Score: 1

    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    THEORY: URM (United Republic of Mars) has super advanced technology far beyond Earths (and seemingly superior ethics). URM is the civilization that was formed by Elon Musk's departure and colonization of Mars, bringing many of the brightest and most visionary minds with him.