Slashdot Mirror


Venezuela's Government Appears To be Trying To Hack Activists With Phishing Pages (vice.com)

Hackers allegedly working for the embattled Venezuelan government tried to trick activists into giving away their passwords to popular services such as Gmail, Facebook, Twitter, and others, according to security researchers. From a report: Last week, the Venezuelan opposition leader Juan Guaido called for citizens to volunteer with the goal of helping international humanitarian organizations deliver aid into the country. President Nicolas Maduro is refusing to accept aid and has erected blocks across a border bridge with Colombia with the military's help. The volunteer efforts were organized around the website voluntariosxvenezuela.com. A week later, on February 11 someone registered an almost identical domain, voluntariosvenezuela[.]com. And on Wednesday, users in Venezuela who were trying to visit the original and official VoluntariosxVenezuela website were redirected to the newer one, according to security firm Kaspersky Lab, as well as Venezuelan users on Twitter.

74 comments

  1. What happened to " allegedly" in the headline? by aod7br7932 · · Score: 2

    Btw a great explanation about "the bridge with erected blocks" in portuguese: https://noticias.uol.com.br/in...

    1. Re:What happened to " allegedly" in the headline? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Governments can't sue for libel or slander.

    2. Re:What happened to " allegedly" in the headline? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That depends on the local laws. It may come as a shock to you, but some countries have laws that are different than the ones in the USA.

    3. Re:What happened to " allegedly" in the headline? by itsownreward · · Score: 1

      If, like me, you're a US person sitting in in the US making a comment on a US website over a civil matter... well, sue me. GLWT

  2. Again and again.. by bobbied · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Socialist Utopia in Venezuela crumbles.... Socialism has never worked. Yet we still hear calls for socialist ideas ringning loud and clear.

    Those who know history are bound to watch in alarm while those who don't know history insist on repeating it over their objections.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    1. Re: Again and again.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maduro needs to exterminate these insurgent terrorists before they start killing innocent civilians and blaming al-Qaeda, like happened on 9-11-2001 in the Fascist Pig States of America. Goto ae911truth dot org for the scientific facts of the case.

      Funny how nobody is blaming Obama for the leftist problem in Venezuela, though. Everything appears to be Trump and Putin's fault, again.

    2. Re:Again and again.. by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Yet we still hear calls for socialist ideas ringning loud and clear.

      Well, The Economist thinks that this is yet another thing that we can blame on The Millennials:

      Millennial Socialism: https://www.economist.com/lead...

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    3. Re:Again and again.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please leave /. and take your mindless right-wing trash and FoxNews talking points with you. This place was a lot more informative when you people weren't here several years ago.

    4. Re:Again and again.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me be clear I am not disagreeing with you. I am adding.

      Socialism devolves into facisim. Pretty much every time.

      Capitalism (a term invented by socialists to make people feel warm and fuzzy about themselves and setup the 'we vs they' combative tones) usually devolves into feudalism.

      Now of those two one we can kinda control. The other always goes straight to oppression.

      Socialist ideals sound nice right up until you run into a slack ass and have to make him work. To do that you need the money and power of the rest of the group. That usually runs out too.

    5. Re: Again and again.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Name one actual failure directly attributed to socialism. You can't. Because like most empty-minded demagogues, you are only preaching against an enemy in order to distract the public by creating a scapegoat while deliberately refraining from particulars.

      A corrupt, oppressive government that pretends to ideals? That covers everything from an aristocracy to a zootopia. Happened in Chile, Brazil, Argentina, Zimbabwe, Ypres and Wallachia.

      Fortunately, not all Americans are fooled by your duplicitous declarations of emergencies, and can actually spot the buffoonery of your rhetoric.

      Don't worry though, I'm sure you can find a frontman for another CIA coup. Then you can start a phony war while smuggling drugs. And arrest more American citizens for speaking languages besides English. For liberty!

    6. Re:Again and again.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Besides china, those countries are not socialist dipshit.

    7. Re:Again and again.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trillions spent on war and terrorism (with no end in sight) and the ever increasing corporate subversion of democracy will destroy America, not socialism. You're tilting at windmills, Quixote.

    8. Re:Again and again.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Socialism never worked"?!?
      Top ten most socialist countries:
      China
      Denmark
      Finland
      Netherlands
      Canada
      Sweden
      Norway
      Ireland
      New Zealand
      Belgium
      Socialism seems to be working fine in all those countries! Yes, Venezuela was criminally mismanaged by people with zero understanding of basic economics, but it is by no means a good example of a socialist state.

      one thing is a social agenda... and been socialist... China might me the most capitalist country ever in the way they handle bussiness

    9. Re:Again and again.. by bobbied · · Score: 1

      AND.. What kind of standard of living does the average person in China have? China has been forced into making capitalistic reforms to keep their economy alive.

      Oh, and don't forget, the only people trying to get into China for a better standard of living are from North Korea...

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    10. Re:Again and again.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Socialism never worked"?!? Top ten most socialist countries: China

      China isn't a socialist country, it's a capitalist dictatorship.

    11. Re: Again and again.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Socialism doesn't work... except that almost every successful economy in the world is socialist by US standards. The ONE exception is the one with the greatest abuse of its poor, the USA.

    12. Re: Again and again.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every one of those except China is socialist. China is a weird hybrid of capitalist/communist these days.

    13. Re:Again and again.. by penandpaper · · Score: 1

      > standard of living for the average Chinese
      > makes capitalistic reforms to keep economy alive.

      So, If China didn't adopt those capitalistic reforms their economy wouldn't stay alive and the standard of living for the average Chinese would be lower... Got it. Thanks.

      Capitalism has done more to help people out of poverty in the world than any other system of economics. It's not perfect but it is a lot better than centralizing command of the economy in hopes that those in control are not idiots and/or malevolent. More resources go to Bezos because he is successful in managing those resources.

    14. Re:Again and again.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love the economist, but "leaders" is their obfuscation of op-ed pieces. Ignore them. They have no value.

    15. Re: Again and again.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too many people like to redefine words to suit their purpose. No western country is socialist. Too many confuse it with a capitalistic nation using high taxes and oil to pay for social services.

      Capitalist nation with free markets and private property with high taxes for social services is NOT A SOCIALIST COUNTRY.

      You fucking morons keep vomiting that convoluted garbage to push an agenda. Want high taxes? Fine do it at the state or city level. Don't impose them on me. I don't want your high taxes or social services. I voted with my feet. Now leave me alone.

    16. Re:Again and again.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Capitalism has done more to help people out of poverty in the world than any other system of economics.

      Capitalism has done more to drive people into poverty, out of their homes, and into an early grave than any other system of economics.

      It is fundamentally imperfect and dangerously flawed as resources are taken from those who could use them and into the hands of those who simply have the ability to take from others and deprive them of the benefit of their labors.

      And unlike central planning, there isn't one easy enemy to target. The criminals are a mob around you.

    17. Re:Again and again.. by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      The Chinese PEOPLE are some of the most naturally capitalist people in the world. The government is a curious hybrid of a centrally managed economy with incentives for capitalism. So far, it seems to be working, despite some obvious problems.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    18. Re:Again and again.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet we still hear calls for socialist ideas ringning loud and clear.

      No we don't. Literally nobody is calling for anything like Venezuela. A lot of people want socialized medicine and a social safety net, which is very different. And it works astoundingly well compared to the US system, see most of Europe which has lower health care costs and better outcomes. Conflating a desire for something like that with Venezuela is what Fox News crowd tends to do and is extremely inaccurate.

    19. Re: Again and again.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "B-b-but it wasn't really socialism! This time it will work!" you sniveled.

    20. Re: Again and again.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Literally half of the Democrat party used Venezuela as their socialist utopia example, mysteriously up until about 4 years ago.

    21. Re: Again and again.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And capitalism does work? Bahahaha. It's more of a cycle than anything. Dictatorships breed socialism. Socialism eventually breeds capitalism and in time capitalism collapses into another dictatorship, once again angering the people into a socialist reform... Rinse and repeat.

    22. Re:Again and again.. by bobbied · · Score: 1

      How about you take your mindlessness and go learn some history.

      Venezuela was a vibrant economic force in South America only 20 years ago. They where rich in natural resources and had great prospects for ever increasing standards of living, improving health care and freedom for it's citizens. Now it's a country wide slum, the likes of which you've likely never seen, much less experienced. They are awash in poverty, death, starvation and oppression.

      What changed? I dare you to go investigate and figure it out for yourself.

      My Venezuelan friends generally agree with me. The mistake was adopting a government which was based on socialism. They where giving the "poor" stuff and taking from the "rich" to pay for it. Now, nearly EVERYBODY is poor and starving. The government took everything and squandered it, spent more than it could tax and is now printing Bolivars as fast as it can in an attempt to pay it's bills. Inflation is at 4 digits and their creditors are getting stiffed. The house of cards is falling, death and bloody violence will be the inevitable result. But that's ALWAYS the result when socialism runs amuck like this.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    23. Re:Again and again.. by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Man, is this what they teach in schools these days.. Do try to think a bit past your nose and ask yourself a few "then what" questions.

      Wealth is NOT a fixed sized pie. Wealth can be created and the pie gets bigger, or it can be consumed and the pie gets smaller. I dare you to think about that for awhile. More wealth means more to spread around and isn't that what we really need?

      Capitalism is responsible for creating more wealth than ANY other economic model it makes the pie bigger. Socialism has exactly the OPPSIT effect, it consumes wealth and makes the pie smaller.

      So... The goal is to increase the average size of individual slices of pie, specifically my slice. I say we do this by making a bigger pie. In the mean time, you are complaining because some have bigger slices than you.... You want to take from the big slices of pie, to supplement the smaller pieces, I want to grow the pie as big as possible and I'm not so concerned that Bill Gates has a huge slice, as long as my slice is growing.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  3. Yeah COMMUNISM!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NT

    1. Re: Yeah COMMUNISM!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then another group will redirect the redirected site

  4. Cyber civil war? by IHTFISP · · Score: 1

    This sounds to me like the Maduro administration/military has just declared cyber war on its own people.

    Could this be the world's first cyber civil war? Or has Syria, Iran, Russia or China already pulled a similar stunt?

    --
    Error: NSE - No Signature Error
    1. Re:Cyber civil war? by dristoph · · Score: 2

      Have you ever heard of the NSA

    2. Re:Cyber civil war? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cyber civil war is a bit strong. They're trying to catch a few traitors still clinging to a failed coup. They are scamming the scammers! Like a few people managed to actually trick the Nigerian prince. The US and their collaborators caused billions in economic damages and are offering millions in "aid", a literal 1000x discrepancy.
      e.g., it has been official US policy to crash the Venezuelan economy by all means, and in Venezuela warehouses full of basic necessity products were found while penury was organized in stores so as to cause panics and allow media stories and pictures of empty shelves.
      People have died because treatments for diabetes and malaria were artificially embargoed, and you can thank the US and their collaborators for that.

    3. Re:Cyber civil war? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The GCHQ and UK mil has been tracking people globally for decades using the phone network...
      Location, voice prints.
      A lot of early digital phone networks allowed a lot of interesting people to be found. Along with anyone they stayed in contact with.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  5. Larry Ellison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't *ever* do business with any company affiliated with Larry Ellison. He's the ***GREEDIEST*** son-of-a-bitch on planet Earth, and if your company has dealings with this man, I hope you ***DIE OF RECTAL CANCER***, because you didn't have the COURAGE to SPEAK OUT.

  6. Slash censorship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The previous article (slashvertisment) about minds is being heavily censored.
    I've been hitting refresh and the new comment count was -8 at one point, so at least 8 comments have been memory-holed.
    Since when did slashdot do such heavy handed censorship?

  7. Only Thing That Brings Us Together by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Republican and Democrat, Trump supporter and Pelosi lover. Invading foreign countries with oil. First comes the "strong condemnation". Then comes the US staged coup. Then comes the US defense of democracy! For freedom of course.

  8. Blocking Humanitarian Aid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Whenever I see articles talking about countries sending other countries "humanitarian aid," I think back to the articles regarding Russia sending "humanitarian aid" as a cover for Russia sending weapons and munitions into Crimea and the Ukraine. Back then, it was all too easy for the media to claim that the humanitarian aid shipments were munitions for the front line fighters, with maybe a little food and medicines placed on top for border inspectors to see and approve of.

    "President Nicolas Maduro is refusing to accept aid" makes it sound like Maduro is a horrible man, blocking humanitarian aid from reaching the poor people inside his starving country. If "aid" is actually guns and ammo for Juan Guaido trying to stage a war to take over the country, then it makes a lot more sense why Maduro wouldn't want those shipments getting in.

    1. Re:Blocking Humanitarian Aid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The Red Cross basically denied supplying the US provided "aid". So did the Vatican.

      So USAID to the rescue it goes. An US state organization with clear links to the CIA.

    2. Re:Blocking Humanitarian Aid by Espectr0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      venezuelan here. while conspiracy theories are great, the real reason Maduro doesn't want the aid it's because he would implicitly admit his government has failed and people are dying and fleeing the country. it's as easy as that.

      his regime along with chavez has been in power for 20 years. and now they blame the US sanctions (that have been for less than 2 years) for all the troubles.

    3. Re:Blocking Humanitarian Aid by bobbied · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, this is food and medicine, nothing more..

      Maduro would be forced to admit that his (and his predecessor's) policies of socialistic reforms have failed and the country is now solely dependent on handouts for survival. That the people are starving and in nearly open revolt because the system is broken.

      This is a HUGE difference from the Venezuela of only two decades ago. The government has since taken over most private companies, soaked up their resources paying for social programs and ran everything into the condition we see today. This is how such ideas always have ended. Maduro cannot admit to his failure or the whole political gig is up for him and given the conditions he'd be lucky to make it out of the country alive to live in exile.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    4. Re:Blocking Humanitarian Aid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If "aid" is actually guns and ammo for Juan Guaido trying to stage a war to take over the country, /p>

      Inspecting a container "supposed to be aid" is easy. Empty it completely - unpack everything. The re-pack if it is found to be in order. Soldiers can do the unpacking - no weapon will get through then. Then the poor can re-pack and distribute stuff. Thorough checking add some delay, that is all.

      This is not hard to do. But Maduro don't want aid - because receiving aid acknowledges that his government has failed in its mission. That is the problem here. Of course, blocking aid like that is comical - nobody would be sending expensive aid i there was no crisis.

    5. Re:Blocking Humanitarian Aid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you let some dude fuck your wife for months on and then accept his generous "aid" of two condoms gifted to you?

    6. Re: Blocking Humanitarian Aid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the maduro administration has accepted lots of international aid -- from countries that aren't trying to end venezuelan democracy. from countries that don't have a history of instigating coups in venevuela, that aren't engaged in a long-running economic blockade of venezuela, and that aren't simply offering aid as a cynical pr stunt that is probably just a cover for delivering arms to contras.

    7. Re: Blocking Humanitarian Aid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you actually live in Central or South America and your blood doesn't run cold when Elliot Abrams says he's going to bring democracy to your country, you're probably looking forward to bayonetting infants or raping nuns.

    8. Re: Blocking Humanitarian Aid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course all the fucking anonymous hacks are supporting the murderous dictator. Venezuela takes aid from Cuba, Iran, Russia and China. A murderer's row of oppression and death. All to spread communism, which brings misery wherever it goes. Fucking wake up already, you self destructive morons.

    9. Re: Blocking Humanitarian Aid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      o yes, the notoriously communist iranians

    10. Re:Blocking Humanitarian Aid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The sanctions have been in place since the 2015 Presidential declaration of National Emergency by President Obama. The pressure against the Venezuelan government has been in place and constant since Hugo Chavez was elected president in 1999. In addition, how can anyone ignore the 2002 failed coup attempt supported by the United States?
      The Venezuelan government has rejected the politically-motivated offer of aid and they should. First of all, US NGOs form the tip of the spear in American foreign government interference and it is a US NGO designated to distribute aid. The offer of aid is a trojan horse designed to get more hostile resources, weapons no doubt, into the country. That is why international organizations have refused to participate, because of the fact the aid is tied to political pressure on the government.
      The picture of the bridge between Columbia and Venezuela that the news media claim was blocked by the Venezuelan military is based on a lie. That bridge, a $40 million project completed in 2013, has never been opened to traffic. It was the site of Colombian military infiltration into Venezuela and was never opened due to security concerns. Of course, you go down the river about 10 kilometers and you find the Simon Bolivar bridge where 30,000 people a day cross. Why does the US government and the news media decide to use easily disproven lies to support their case.
      What is happening in Venezuela is another state-sponsored terrorist attack, sponsored mostly by the US, in order to topple the legitimate government of Nicolas Maduro and install a US puppet, Juan Guaido, in his place. That is illegal internationally and satisfies the textbook definition of terrorism.

  9. China has been doing it for a long time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China has been doing this for longer than most slashtards have been alive. But, we keep seeing propaganda about how good China and socialism are, so I guess they're winning.

  10. Unlike NSA-Backdoored Routers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eak a cock USA. Youre on the wrong side of history AGAIN.

  11. more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fake news

  12. Elliot Abrams by dristoph · · Score: 1, Troll

    Elliot Abrams, the recently named special envoy to Venezuela, has a past of using "aid" shipments to smuggle weapons into countries south of the border, weapons later used to massacre countless civilians, and then lying about it in testimony. No government in its right mind would allow such a shipment. The Red Cross and UN have both decried this maneuver by the US as a political stunt. And Venezuela is in fact currently accepting aid, just not from countries which have a record of both using aid as a Trojan horse for contraband and invading countries after dubiously declaring their governments to be illegitimate.

    But why should I expect any of this information to be in a Slashdot summary.

    1. Re:Elliot Abrams by JumbleGuy · · Score: 2

      Thank you for this post. It's amazing how many people are being taken in by the propaganda being pushed by the Corporate Media/Military Industrial Complex/Democrat/Republican money machine. This is the same thing that happened with the Iraq war. It's about oil.

    2. Re:Elliot Abrams by dristoph · · Score: 1

      And of course it got modded as a Troll. This site has gotten more and more reactionary over the last ~5 years.

    3. Re:Elliot Abrams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe post some evidence and citations next time, you Commie hack.

    4. Re: Elliot Abrams by dristoph · · Score: 1

      This can all be looked up readily if youâ(TM)re skeptical, itâ(TM)s not secret. Presumably you have internet access.

  13. Re: You So Woke Bro! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope you enjoy dying of a treatable cancer when your health insurance company cuts you off. Here in the socialist hellhole of Canada I'll just get treatment. Such hell compared to your freedumbs!

  14. LOL by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    If Guaido is "recognized interim president of Venezuela" then surely he doesn't need any help getting stuff into the country he's interim president of... I mean, doesn't he have the power now that Trump and all the US vassals and sychophants have "recognized" him? Can't he just decree stuff - oh wait no, that's only how dictators do things... can't he just use his presidential power to make stuff happen?

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    1. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're mocking the guy who has actual real democratic support because he's powerless under the murderous oppressive Commie dictator? What fucking pure grade retardation is that?

    2. Re: LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this putschist imposter didn't even get the most votes in his own state in the 2015 elections. evansville indiana has a greater population than the total number of votes cast for his entire party. 80% of venezuelans had never even heard of him before he declared himself president. even the other opposition parties think he's a fuck.

    3. Re:LOL by Dunbal · · Score: 2

      actual real democratic support

      It's pretty clear what your definition of democracy is. The guy backed by a foreign power. Not the guy people voted for. OK. China, India and Russia should proclaim that in fact Nancy Pelosi is US president.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  15. Funny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's super funny about this is a WHOIS lookup on the phishing domain shows it was owned by a US rightwing thinktank. Now it is privacy guarded, but naturally nobody is going to investigate this horrendously obvious rehash of Chile in 1973. Anyone with an IQ above freezing point has acknowledged this is a poorly executed coup attempt, and the vast majority of Venezuelan people do NOT want Guaido, but want a special election (in which Maduro will likely win again, as the UN has acknowledged had they been allowed to observe the last election; instead they were deterred by guns by the opposition who "boycotted" the election and then whined about how their guy who didn't even run didn't win).

    The US will once again install their puppet, privatize the shit out of the country, plunder it's resources, murder thousands of people, Guaido will become forever compared to Hitler (just like Pinochet is now to Chilean people), and the country will (again) only recover by violently ousting the puppet and returning to socialist policies 30 years later.

    1. Re:Funny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are saying things with property, like if you knew anything about Venezuela.

      > (in which Maduro will likely win again, as the UN has acknowledged had they been allowed to observe the last election; instead they were deterred by guns by the opposition who "boycotted" the election and then whined about how their guy who didn't even run didn't win)

      Laughing at this stupid sentence in particular. "as the UN has acknoeledged had they been allowed to observe"? WTF does that even mean? The main opposition candidates have been banned from running, you dipshit.

      Meanwhile, me and everybody raised there has the exact opposite opinion, hates Maduro and wants him jailed or exiled, and wants to see Guaido take over.

  16. The U.S. Government Appears To be Trying To Hack by pigsycyberbully · · Score: 0
  17. Propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The bridge thing is bunk. That bridge never opened because of a dispute with Columbia, and has been blocked by those containers for a while. The "intelligence sources" is CrowdStrike, the firm the DNC hired to keep the supposedly hacked mail server from the FBI.

  18. Starving Venezuela Into Submission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Starving Venezuela Into Submission
    Israel Shamir February 12, 2019 2,100 Words 106 Comments Reply

    You are so kind-hearted! I shed a tear thinking of American generosity. “So many delightful goodies: sacks of rice, canned tuna and protein-rich biscuits, corn flour, lentils and pasta, arrived at the border of troubled Venezuela – enough for one light meal each for five thousand people”, – reported the news in a sublime reference to five thousand fed by Christ’s fishes and loaves. True, Christ did not take over the bank accounts and did not seize the gold of those he fed. But 21st century Venezuela is a good deal more-prosperous than 1st century Galilee. Nowadays, you have to organise a blockade if you want people to be grateful for your humanitarian aid.

    This is not a problem. The US-UK duo did it in Iraq, as marvellous Arundhati Roy wrote in April 2003 (in The Guardian of old, before it turned into an imperial tool): After Iraq was brought to its knees, its people starved, half a million of its children killed, its infrastructure severely damaged the blockade and war were followed by you guessed it! Humanitarian relief. At first, they blocked food supplies worth billions of dollars, and then they delivered 450 tonnes of humanitarian aid and celebrated their generosity for a few days of live TV broadcasts. Iraq had had enough money to buy all the food it needed, but it was blocked, and its people received only some peanuts.

    And this was rather humane by American standards. In the 18th century, the British colonists in North America used more drastic methods while dispensing aid to disobedient natives. The Red Indians were expelled from their native places, and then they were provided humanitarian aid: whiskey and blankets. The blankets had been previously used by smallpox patients. The native population of North America was decimated by the ensuing epidemics from this and similar measures. Probably you haven’t heard of this chapter of your history: the USA has many Holocaust museums but not a single memorial to the genocide near home. It is much more fun to discuss faults of Germans and Turks than of your own forefathers.

    First, you starve people; then you bring them humanitarian aid. This was proposed by John McNaughton at Pentagon: bomb locks and dams, by shallow-flooding the rice, cause widespread starvation (more than a million dead?) “And then we shall deliver humanitarian aid to the starving Vietnamese”. Or, rather, “we could offer to do [that] at the conference table.” Planning a million dead by starvation, in writing: if such a note would be found on the ruins of the Third Reich, it would seal the story of genocide, it would be quoted daily. But the story of the genocide of the Vietnamese is rarely mentioned nowadays.

    They did it in Syria, too. At first, they brought weapons for every Muslim extremist, then they blockaded Damascus, and then they sent some humanitarian aid, but only to the areas under rebel control.

    This cruel but efficient method of breaking nations’ spirit has been developed by lion tamers for years, perhaps for centuries. You have to starve the beast until it will take food from your hands and lick your fingers. ‘Starvation-taming’, they call it.

    The Israelis practice it in Gaza. They block all export or import from the Strip, interdict fishing in the Mediterranean and drip-feed the captive Palestinians by ‘humanitarian aid’. Jews, being Jews, make it one better: they made the EU to pay for the humanitarian aid to Gaza AND to buy the aid stuff from Israel. This made Gaza an important source of profit for the Jewish state.

    So in Venezuela they follow an old script. The US and its London poodle seized over 20 billion dollars from Venezuela and from Venezuelan national companies. They stole over a billion in gold ingots Venezuela had trustingly deposited in the cellars of the Bank of England.

    Well, they said they will give this money to a Venezuela

  19. Venezuela Shills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There seems to be a few shills for Venezuela on /. too.

    1. Re:Venezuela Shills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean for Maduro? Yes. Scary.

  20. I'm a hacker, you're a hacker... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...he's a hacker, she's a hacker, wouldn't you like to be a hacker too?

    Let me just ask all Slashdotters, please post your account name/passwords for all your online sites?

    IM such a 1337 Haxor!

  21. How to roll back a color revolution by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    The part governments never understood was that the NSA, GCHQ, CIA and MI6 had the top mil/gov commanders communications networks.
    Calls got made and the CIA made offers.
    Freedom, no war crime investigation, cash to stand down.
    Counter intelligence never seemed to get a recording, never stopped such calls.
    The military and police command stood down. The color revolution using protesters could move on.

    What the more skilled counter intelligence services have finally worked out after decades is just how active the CIA and NSA are on their now nations secure mil/gov networks.
    The new way around such attempts is to flood networks with calls in accents offering inside information and a way out to mil/gov command level staff.
    The staff then have to state an instant yes/no to a CIA offer. Freedom/cash or stay working for the gov?
    The ability to turn an entire nations command staff has now gotten more difficult as counter intelligence is now making the same offers on the same secure and private networks.
    Add to that social media push back countering think tank, NGO and professional protest movements.
    Color revolutions only work if the police and mil stand down and for protesters to take over a gov during the US news cycle.
    Every police and mil officer now has to wonder if they said Yes to standing down and who the call was really from.
    Do a full Tiananmen square?
    Go full East Germany and the Stasi after getting direct reassurance from another nation?
    Counter intelligence is finally not waiting for NGO, think tanks to hand out the protest stickers, banners, to fund protesters. Not allowing global social media to arrange protest locations.
    No on location TV to get the optics of a "large" protest and police commanders doing nothing.
    The mil in the side streets will not react the same way East German troops did.
    Communications is now a counter intelligence trap. Every phone call, every social media message to protest is a trap.
    A very different approach from the 1980's Stasi long term undercover investigative approach that allowed large protests to build and take place.
    For the import and spread of campaigning banners, stickers, slogans, the free use of social media to pre position protesters.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  22. Assumption about hackers' origin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would anyone immediately assume that hackers fighting the illegal coup attempt in Venezuela would be working for the Venezuelan government? What exactly could the government do with that information? Being an IT professional and knowing that many in my profession have a heightened sensitivity to economic and political crises around the globe, I would assume that the hackers are working to expose the criminal activities of the US, OAS, and EU in attacking the legitimately-elected Venezuelan government.
    The hacker group Anonymous has engaged in similar activities in the past when an obvious wrong is detected. The threat to Venezuela, a crime that could result in the death of thousands of innocents as has happened in Honduras, Syria, Ukraine, El Salvador, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Brazil, and elsewhere because the US or its allies do not like the results of a free and fair election in foreign nations can and should be stopped.

  23. Re: You So Woke Bro! by bobbied · · Score: 1

    I hope you enjoy dying of a treatable cancer when your health insurance company cuts you off. Here in the socialist hellhole of Canada I'll just get treatment. Such hell compared to your freedumbs!

    LOL.. You DO understand that there can be no limits to health insurance coverage now in the USA right? It's literally illegal to write such a policy now.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101