Slashdot Mirror


Israel To Launch First Privately Funded Moon Mission (theguardian.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Guardian: A team of Israeli scientists is to launch what will be the first privately funded mission to land on the moon this week, sending a spacecraft to collect data from the lunar surface. Named Beresheet, the Hebrew word for Genesis, the 585kg (1,290lb) robotic lander will blast off from Florida at 01.45 GMT on Friday, propelled by one of Elon Musk's SpaceX Falcon 9 rockets. Once it touches down, in several weeks, it will measure the magnetic field of the moon to help understand how it formed. Beresheet will also deposit a "time capsule" of digital files the size of coins containing the Bible, children's drawings, Israel's national anthem and blue and white flag, as well as memories of a Holocaust survivor. While it is not a government-led initiative, the state-owned Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) corporation joined as a partner. If the mission is successful, Israel will become the fourth country, after Russia, the U.S. and China, to reach the moon. "This is the lowest-budget spacecraft to ever undertake such a mission," an IAI statement said of the $100 million project. "The superpowers who managed to land a spacecraft on the moon have spent hundreds of millions." It added that although it was a private venture, Beresheet was a "national and historic achievement."

19 of 161 comments (clear)

  1. Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "containing the Bible, children's drawings, Israel's national anthem and blue and white flag, as well as memories of a Holocaust survivor" - What, no tiny bagels?

  2. Well, yes, but by Brett+Buck · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "The superpowers who managed to land a spacecraft on the moon have spent hundreds of millions."

        Yes, 50 years ago, and having to develop the entire thing from scratch instead of opening a bunch of catalogs and buying the parts.

    1. Re:Well, yes, but by bunyip · · Score: 2

      Exactly what I thought. Just wondering if Berzerkistan could buy a launch from Elon Musk and land a thumb drive on the moon, claiming 5th place?

      A.

    2. Re:Well, yes, but by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2

      yeah you know except for the whole ICBM program created by captured germans

      And Werner Von Braun hanged the five slowest Jewish slaves in front of his rocket factory to get them to work faster cite. Skip forward a few years and he's the Director of Marshall Spaceflight and Huntsville is naming their civic center after him.

      Buying a ride from Elon is a bullshit claim to be in the group of countries who actually built rockets that went to the moon, but there is a certain value to doing it, long after the Nazis are all dead.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    3. Re:Well, yes, but by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2

      The superpowers who managed to land a spacecraft on the moon have spent hundreds of millions.

      Yes, 50 years ago, and having to develop the entire thing from scratch instead of opening a bunch of catalogs and buying the parts.

      And... if I recall correctly, one of those superpowers sent several spacecraft, with people in them, to the moon and back.

      So, while it will be a great achievement, don't break an arm jerking yourself off (to quote Rick Sanchez) as you still spent $100M on a "probe" to be launched on top of a SpaceX Falcon 9 booster (a US company) -- while the super powers, of which you speak, built their own back in the day.

      Congrats, but settle down.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    4. Re:Well, yes, but by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Informative

      There is a great documentary about how the Nazis built and launched their rockets that was made by the British after the war, as a way to document the whole process so that the knowledge would not be lost.

      https://youtu.be/80DzifHHIxk

      It's absolutely fascinating. Not only did they manage to build rockets capable of reaching space, but they managed make them simple and robust enough that largely unskilled soldiers could operate them. They developed many of the basic techniques that became fundamental to all future rockets.

      Germany was an engineering powerhouse. Such a shame it was wasted on that war, and built on the back of slaves and bigotry.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:Well, yes, but by Red_Forman · · Score: 2

      How hard could it be to develop the paperclip? Those things are sold in packs of 100 for one dollar these days.

  3. errr... by iggymanz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So the Iz are going to put a thing atop an American rocket and claim they "reached the moon"?

    1. Re:errr... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So the Iz are going to put a thing atop an American rocket and claim they "reached the moon"?

      As if it's not enough, the thing blasted off from Florida, and not from Jerusalem.

      If it's claimed to be an ISRAELIS project, MAKE IT SO !!!

    2. Re:errr... by tal_mud · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not as simple as you think. Building the lunar lander is a major achievement. Indeed, google offered a $30,000,000 prize for the lunar lander part even after taking into account the existence of commercial launch systems. See: https://lunar.xprize.org/prize.... The Israeli team missed the deadline, but, if their lander succeeds, will have achieved the goal.

  4. Mel Brooks called it by paiute · · Score: 3, Funny
    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
  5. Re:Antiscience advocate Brett Buttfuck here to tea by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 2

    There is no such thing as "from scratch" in engineering. They have stood on the shoulders of giants in case your nazi ass missed it

    Actually, in the case of rocketry, most of the world stood on the shoulders of Nazis, in case your giant ass missed it.

  6. Don't be snarky. by az-saguaro · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So far, the posts in response to this article are all sarcastic and cynical, mocking the claim of "reaching the moon" when they are just hitching a ride on SpaceX, not to mention riding the coattails of big nation states that have spent billions over half a century to develop the foundational technologies and do it all in grander style. But think about the historical significance of this. It may be small potatoes in a sense, but it is indeed the first time that a non-governmental low budget endeavor gets there (if it succeeds). The journey of a thousand miles starts with a single step. You cannot do something the 2nd and 3rd time without doing it the first time. Making inexpensive or commercially feasible trips to the moon with some regularity will depend on projects of this magnitude and expense, and at some point, somebody does it first, and this is it.

    True, they are not running the whole show themselves. The launch comes from a an established carrier. But therein is another wondrous thing. A government rocket is not lifting them, a private enterprise is. And don't forget that with complex technologies, businesses are highly interconnected and dependent on each other - no one company can do it all themselves - even NASA needed thousands of subcontractors to get Apollo there and back. Furthermore, all they are doing with SpaceX is getting off the ground, and nowadays, that's easy. Not so easy is dropping out of orbit and landing, without overshooting or crashing, and the Israeli craft will do that on its own. And, a small potatoes budget forces you to be clever, and how they are going to get from low orbit to the moon on minimum weight and fuel is itself inspiring, lessons to be learned for all the moon trekkers who hope to follow.

    If nothing else, this kind of event can inspire other pioneers and entrepreneurs that it can be done. Something hasn't been done until the moment it is done, and whoever did it, they were the first. Their pride is understandable. You would be too if you were the first, and we would equally applaud and be inspired by you. This opens the gates, and more will follow. Who knows, next could be the Jamaican bob-rocket team. (And instead of Tang, rum and mauby.)

  7. Re:No I Can't Type More Than That For My Subject by TurboStar · · Score: 2

    Wrong. What you have are transistors, and the hope that someone will be able to read their on-off state at some indeterminate point in the future

    Why would they send transistors instead of physically encoded data like everyone else? All of our space junk has miniature data of some sorts. My name is written out in plain text on a piece of silicon floating around in space right now. It seems likely that space-faring animals of the future will have figured out light refraction and be able to read all this.

    Flash and other re-writable technology doesn't last long and anyone who can build a moon lander will know this. So if they sent up transistors it'll be old school ROM or PROM tech which will be visible under magnification. Nothing in the article indicated they did this though. Sounds like they made some little CDs or just laser etched the text on little discs/coins.

  8. Re: Antiscience advocate Brett Buttfuck here to te by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

    If you look at the history of mathematics, Arabs and Greeks optimistically ended their math education in the third year of high school. The really interesting things were discovered after 1700, perhaps with the exception of calculus, which was discovered after 1600.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  9. Re:shoah = the big lie by gibbsjoh · · Score: 2

    For some reason there's no option to report this post, so I'll have to settle for telling this a/c to take a long walk off a short cliff. Fuck off, troll.

    --
    -- "...I'm a bad guy because I, well, I sing some rock-and-roll songs." M. Manson
  10. Re: Antiscience advocate Brett Buttfuck here to te by Freischutz · · Score: 2

    If you look at the history of mathematics, Arabs and Greeks optimistically ended their math education in the third year of high school. The really interesting things were discovered after 1700, perhaps with the exception of calculus, which was discovered after 1600.

    Really? It is fascinating to see that somebody managed to cram so much arrogance and ignorance combined into a single statement. Algebra is an invention with roots in ancient Babylonia and with contributions from the Greeks but that in it's modern form largely came from the Islamic world. It is considered to be a critical invention because it is the gate keeper to all higher mathematics. As for Geometry, where the Greeks made a a huge contribution, it is kind of descriptive of it's importance that one of the two times Isaac Newton was heard to laugh is when somebody asked what the point of Euclid's Elements element's was. Newton once said: "If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of Giants", he had a point. None of this stuff that you consider uninteresting was trivial or obvious at the time it was discovered and your 'interesting stuff' would not be possible without it.

  11. Re:The most painful cut by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You have to understand, no Jewish woman would ever take anything that's not 10% off.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  12. Re:'Holohoax' survivor - LOL by Cederic · · Score: 2

    For the record: The 'Holocaust' is not a lie.

    Educate yourself instead of sharing your idiocy on the internet.