Slashdot Mirror


Inside Elizabeth Holmes's Chilling Final Months at Theranos (vanityfair.com)

In the final months of Theranos, before the blood testing start-up was debunked and its founders charged with fraud, then-CEO Elizabeth Holmes brought a puppy, who she insisted was a wolf to others, with a penchant for peeing into the mix, according to Vanity Fair, which has detailed the chaos that ensued in the waning days of the startup, once valued at $9 billion. The 35-year-old Stanford University dropout has also met with filmmakers who she hopes would make a documentary about her "real story," the outlet reported. She also "desperately wants to write a book." An excerpt from the story: Holmes brushed it off when the scientists protested that the dog hair could contaminate samples. But there was another problem with Balto (name of the dog), too. He wasn't potty-trained. Accustomed to the undomesticated life, Balto frequently urinated and defecated at will throughout Theranos headquarters. While Holmes held board meetings, Balto could be found in the corner of the room relieving himself while a frenzied assistant was left to clean up the mess. [...]

By late 2017, however, Holmes had begun to slightly rein in the spending. She agreed to give up her private-jet travel (not a good look) and instead downgraded to first class on commercial airlines. But given that she was flying all over the world trying to obtain more funding for Theranos, she was spending tens of thousands of dollars a month on travel. Theranos was also still paying for her mansion in Los Altos, and her team of personal assistants and drivers, who would become regular dog walkers for Balto. But there were few places she had wasted so much money as the design and monthly cost of the company's main headquarters, which employees simply referred to as "1701," for its street address along Page Mill Road in Palo Alto. 1701, according to two former executives, cost $1 million a month to rent. Holmes had also spent $100,000 on a single conference table. Elsewhere in the building, Holmes had asked for another circular conference room that the former employees said "looked like the war room from Dr. Strangelove," replete with curved glass windows, and screens that would come out of the ceiling so everyone in the room could see a presentation without having to turn their heads.

25 of 250 comments (clear)

  1. I don't see a problem here... by kelarius · · Score: 2

    next you're going to tell me that sharks with frickin laser beams on their fricken heads is a bad investment.

    --
    Personally I'd rather have my idiots at home glued to the TV than out doing idiotic things
  2. 1701 Page Mill Road... Star Trek Referrence... by Crash+Dummy+Redux · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What a coincidence! Wil Wheaton's house number in The Big Bang Theory was 1701.

    1. Re:1701 Page Mill Road... Star Trek Referrence... by denzacar · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Card. Leave. By door. Out.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  3. Political correctness caused the damage by onyxruby · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Due diligence and best practices were sacrificed at the alter of political correctness. People were so desperate to have a female CEO and founder of a large company that they disregarded established safeguards. People need to learn that best practices and due diligence are there for good reasons.

    I'm not objecting to having woman starting and running a business (my wife has done this - I think it's a good thing). I'm objecting to people disregarding established standards in the name of political correctness. Let this be a lesson that narrative should never trump best practices.

    1. Re:Political correctness caused the damage by Megol · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Bullshit.
      Personal connections with people that should have known better and not believing a CEO for a so highly valued company could be lying were the main problems. If someone lost their money for backing a company with a female CEO I'd simply laugh at them - but that wasn't the case for the majority of backers. They backed an incredible technological advancement that could change medical diagnosis all over the world being faster, cheaper, safer. But it was all a gigantic lie.

    2. Re:Political correctness caused the damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      No no, "there was evidence", the problem was it was invented for that purpose, to fool investors and try to skate until the product could live up to the claims. It never made it. If it had worked the fraud might have been sweep-able.

    3. Re:Political correctness caused the damage by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 5, Informative

      Bullshit. Personal connections with people that should have known better and not believing a CEO for a so highly valued company could be lying were the main problems. If someone lost their money for backing a company with a female CEO I'd simply laugh at them - but that wasn't the case for the majority of backers. They backed an incredible technological advancement that could change medical diagnosis all over the world being faster, cheaper, safer. But it was all a gigantic lie.

      Oh come now.

      It was a huge factor - "she's young! She's a woman CEO in tech!" It was all over the place.

    4. Re:Political correctness caused the damage by onyxruby · · Score: 2

      People were starting to raise concerns in 2014 and by 2015 concerns were becoming much more vocal. There was no rational reason to ignore these concerns especially when you are talking about billions in dollars of valuation.

      While they had lawyers on call, I can't believe that was enough to dissuade sincere concerns when billions of dollars were at stake. Therefore an irrational reason must have driven this, and the only thing I've seen that is powerful enough to do that is political correctness. The fact that she was female is not the issue, the fact that political correctness trumped sanity when billions of dollars at stake is.

    5. Re:Political correctness caused the damage by Gavagai80 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Being a pretty young woman has always been a great marketing tactic. If people start invested in companies run by hideous 70 year old women, then it'll either be progress or political correctness.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    6. Re:Political correctness caused the damage by bigdavex · · Score: 2

      I think greed and optimism make a plausible explanation as well.

      --
      -Dave
    7. Re: Political correctness caused the damage by Kyr+Arvin · · Score: 2

      She let a dog walk around the office pissing and shitting. And everyone was too scared to say anything about it, because if they did, they would be fired for being sexist. That's the problem. She made her assistants walk and take care of the dog. And if that wasn't bad enough, the bitch was spending several million a month on private jets. And if that wasn't enough, the bitch was decking out her board room to look like a movie set, well because why not it's not her money she's blowing.

      And if a lowly worker spoke up about said issues, sexist, you are fired.

      I'm sorry you love playing the sexist card, but I've worked at companies where this nonsense happens (not necessarily with a dog, though) where the rank and file DOES NOT SPEAK UP, regardless of the gender of the CEO, because they are afraid of being fired, because you don't call out the CEO, because you have people way above your pay grade to do that.

  4. Stopped reading at WASP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I stopped reading the article the moment they called her a WASP. As soon as they break out the racist terms, I know they are not going to unbiased.
    Why is it ok to call a white person from an upper middle class background a WASP, but it's not ok to call a black person the nword or a person of jewish descent a Jew. Seriously WTF does her race or upbringing have to do with any of this?

    1. Re: Stopped reading at WASP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Her race isn't relevant. But hack journalists drag race into everything because they don't know what else to write about.

    2. Re:Stopped reading at WASP by Kyr+Arvin · · Score: 2

      it's not ok to call .. a person of jewish descent a Jew.

      WTF? I know it was ok to do that in 2018. Who changed the rules and why wasn't anyone notifed?

      I've got the feeling there's more to the grandparent poster's story. Because saying "Steve is Jewish" is fine and always has been fine.
      But shouting "Give me my money back, you fucking JEW!" is not fine. If you call them out they act like they're the victim, making like you're not allowed to refer to a Jewish person as a Jew anymore.

  5. Elizabeth Holmes should be in prison by WCMI92 · · Score: 5, Informative

    She is an instrument of fraud. And she risked people's lives with piss poor testing.

    --
    Corporatism != Free Market
    1. Re:Elizabeth Holmes should be in prison by Nidi62 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      People's lives were not actually at risk as a result of testing their product, that's false.

      Receiving false or inaccurate results from a blood test could lead to people not getting necessary treatment or undergoing unnecessary treatment. If no one was physically harmed she was certainly paving the way to make it possible.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    2. Re:Elizabeth Holmes should be in prison by Nidi62 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      CEO != CTO. Learn the difference. CEO is a fundraiser. Expecting her to be the brains behind the technology belies ignorance of how corporations work on YOUR part.

      One would hope the founder of a medical technology company would have a fundamental understanding of the technology and science behind their primary product, especially if they were touting it as a revolutionary breakthrough.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  6. College Dropout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    One thing I've learnt with some college dropouts is that they quit because they generally take shortcuts for most things in life. My ex team-lead was the same thing, crazy shortcuts/hacks he would do in his code because he couldn't be bothered to take the time to finish it properly.

  7. Re: Let this be a cautionary tale by DickBreath · · Score: 3, Funny

    That's V Pee!

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  8. Mansion? by Solandri · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Theranos was also still paying for her mansion in Los Altos,

    The other stuff is the normal corporate stupidity of giving executives too many privileges. But this is fraud. It could be her mansion, and she was paying for it from her personal funds. Or it could be Theranos' mansion, and she was paying the company rent to live in it. But having the company pay for "her" house is fraud (it's not a legitimate business expense, so she's essentially stealing money from the shareholders), and probably tax evasion (company gets to write it off as a tax-free expense, she doesn't have to pay income taxes on the benefit received).

  9. Re:Clearly a right-wing plot to discredit feminism by DickBreath · · Score: 3, Funny

    > Misogynistic male pigs can't stand to see women succeed, so they make up lies about them.

    No need to lie when the truth is so bad.

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  10. Re:"Chilling" by DickBreath · · Score: 2

    That is not entirely correct. Some of Silicon Valley culture is made up of bovine digestive product, and some smaller percentages are from other species. The exact formulation is a closely held secret. Kept in a bank in Atlanta GA next to the coke formula.

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  11. Re:This is so depressing. by DidgetMaster · · Score: 2

    It definitely does some things 10x better/faster than existing systems (I guess I should have lead with that), but for a well established market like RDBMS where products like Postgres or SQL Server have been around for decades; I thought 2x in the general case was a pretty high bar to clear.

  12. Re:She's a member of the ruling class by Nidi62 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I forgot who but she's somebody's God daughter or something. As long as we continue to pretend our ruling class doesn't exist they're untouchable. Warren Buffet nailed it. (apologies for the WaPo link, open it in incognito/private mode).

    Her father was a VP at Enron(!) then worked at government agencies and her mother was a Congressional staffer. Explains why almost all of her board members were former government officials (none of the board members had experience with biomedical technology-how that didn't raise red flags with investors I don't know; they were probably too busy seeing green)

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  13. Re:What a joke by magarity · · Score: 4, Informative

    Can you imagine a fund in your 401K funding this frivolity, this literal SHIT SHOW - and yes I wrote shit because she would bring in her non-toilet trained dog and allow it to shit in the board room.Private jets. Insane spending on rent, office....I don't care who you are and how rich you could make my investors be, there have to be limits. This is beyond what is acceptable.Insanity.

    If you're quite finished with your rant, Theranos was never publicly traded so no 401K fund would have bought it.