Slashdot Mirror
Could 'Oumuamua Be A Fluffy Radiation-Driven Icy Fractal From Another Star System? (syfy.com)
"Oumuamua, the first object ever seen passing through our solar system from interstellar space, was thought to be emitting gas like a comet to explain its weird motion," reports Syfy Wire, "but a new idea is that the comet is just very, very porous."
Astronomer Phil Plait writes: It was hard to tell what it was; it was too small, faint, and far away to get good observations, and worse, it was only seen on its way out, so it was farther from us literally every day. Then another very weird thing happened: More observations allowed a better determination of its trajectory, and it was found that it wasn't slowing down fast enough. As it moves away, the Sun's gravity pulls on it, slowing it down...but it wasn't slowing down enough. Some force was acting on it, accelerating it very slightly... A new paper has come out that might have a solution, and it's really clever. Maybe 'Oumuamua's not flat. Maybe it's fluffy... [And thus moved by the force of sunlight giving it a tiny push]
When stars are very young, they have a huge disk of material swirling around them; it's from this material that planets form. Out far from the star, where temperatures in the disk are cold, teeny tiny grains of dust and water ice can stick together in funny shapes, creating fractals... Materials made in a fractal pattern can be very porous, and in fact out in that protoplanetary disk around a young star, physical models show that objects can grow fractally until they're as big as 'Oumuamua, and have those extremely low densities needed to account for its weird behavior. So 'Oumuamua doesn't have to be a spaceship. It just has to be a snowflake! A three-dimensionally constructed phenomenally porous low-density snowflake... [T]he new paper suggests it came from a nearby star, and one that's relatively young (less than 100 million years). It formed out in the disk, and got ejected somehow, likely from a planet forming nearby giving it a boost from its gravity.
"I certainly hope we find more beasties like this one," Plait writes. "They can tell us so much about how planets form in other star systems, which is pretty hard to figure out from dozens or hundreds of light years away.
"It's a lot easier when they obligingly send bits of their building materials to us."
Astronomer Phil Plait writes: It was hard to tell what it was; it was too small, faint, and far away to get good observations, and worse, it was only seen on its way out, so it was farther from us literally every day. Then another very weird thing happened: More observations allowed a better determination of its trajectory, and it was found that it wasn't slowing down fast enough. As it moves away, the Sun's gravity pulls on it, slowing it down...but it wasn't slowing down enough. Some force was acting on it, accelerating it very slightly... A new paper has come out that might have a solution, and it's really clever. Maybe 'Oumuamua's not flat. Maybe it's fluffy... [And thus moved by the force of sunlight giving it a tiny push]
When stars are very young, they have a huge disk of material swirling around them; it's from this material that planets form. Out far from the star, where temperatures in the disk are cold, teeny tiny grains of dust and water ice can stick together in funny shapes, creating fractals... Materials made in a fractal pattern can be very porous, and in fact out in that protoplanetary disk around a young star, physical models show that objects can grow fractally until they're as big as 'Oumuamua, and have those extremely low densities needed to account for its weird behavior. So 'Oumuamua doesn't have to be a spaceship. It just has to be a snowflake! A three-dimensionally constructed phenomenally porous low-density snowflake... [T]he new paper suggests it came from a nearby star, and one that's relatively young (less than 100 million years). It formed out in the disk, and got ejected somehow, likely from a planet forming nearby giving it a boost from its gravity.
"I certainly hope we find more beasties like this one," Plait writes. "They can tell us so much about how planets form in other star systems, which is pretty hard to figure out from dozens or hundreds of light years away.
"It's a lot easier when they obligingly send bits of their building materials to us."
I like this kind of articles, they expand my knowledge of things astronomical.
...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
And as we know the universe is only 6000 years old.
See, this is why publishing even highly speculative papers can be productive. I see this as a response to the paper that everyone keeps talking about in terms of 'omg aliens!', where really the person just layed out how much the object would have to weigh in order for its movement to be described like a light sail and then speculated about what types of objects, such as artificial ones, could have that kind of weight to volume ratio.
So now here we have another person taking that idea and proposing how something with those same characteristics could have a naturally occuring origin. This is what I love about watching scientists figure something out. You start with a mystery, someone proposes a mathematically consistent but kinda out there solution, others pick it apart, work with some bits while dropping others and propose a new solution. This is one of the major reasons publication is so important, so others can build off of ideas, even half baked ones.
Just two hundred years ago they thought crossing the Atlantic in two weeks was very quick.
-- Cheers!