Slashdot Mirror


Cryptocurrency Wallet App Coinomi Caught Sending User Passwords To Google's Spellchecker (zdnet.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: Coinomi wallet app sends user passwords to Google's spellchecking service in clear text, exposing users' accounts and their funds to man-in-the-middle (MitM) attacks during which attackers can log passwords and later empty accounts. The issue came to light yesterday after an angry write-up by Oman-based programmer Warith Al Maawali who discovered it while investigating the mysterious theft of 90 percent of his funds. Al Maawali says that during the Coinomi wallet setup, when users select a password (passphrase), Coinomi app grabs the user's input inside the passphrase textbox and silently sends it to Google's Spellcheck API service. [...] Coinomi, which offers a multi-cryptocurrency wallet app for Android, iOS, Linux, Mac, and Windows, did not respond to a request for comment.

75 comments

  1. Could this be a case of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... copying and pasting from StackOverflow?

    1. Re:Could this be a case of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, StackOverflow copy/paste YOU!

  2. I'll get the spit set up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would a password be sent to a spellcheck service? Better question, is it even at all possible this was done as a 100% incompetent mistake, or is it too far out of the way for that? Where are the developers who wrote it?

    A hot fire is in order.

    1. Re:I'll get the spit set up. by PPH · · Score: 2

      Why would a password be sent to a spellcheck service?

      Because you keep misspelling A#1b0Q^xK2-

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:I'll get the spit set up. by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      My password passed the spell check because it's "password", so who's laughing now? If only you people would stick to plain English passwords and spelled them correctly there wouldn't be a problem.

    3. Re:I'll get the spit set up. by MrLogic17 · · Score: 1

      If it's a BIP39 seed, it's a list of 12 randomly chosen, common words. A typo in the spelling of any of those words means it's not a valid seed-word. I can see someone thinking that checking the spelling of a word isn't a security issue, but do it 12 times in a row, and you've leaked the root key for a BTC HD wallet.

      Just plain dumb.

    4. Re:I'll get the spit set up. by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      The real crime here is that they don't send the password also to a grammar checking service.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    5. Re:I'll get the spit set up. by martinX · · Score: 1

      Shut up, man, that's my password too. Stop telling everyone.

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    6. Re:I'll get the spit set up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, that's the combination for my luggage!

  3. The Important part missing from TF Summary by itsme1234 · · Score: 3, Informative

    "The user interface is designed using HTML/JavaScript and rendered using integrated Chromium (Google's open-source project) based browser"

    'nuf said. Surely there are more wrong things wrong with that...

    1. Re:The Important part missing from TF Summary by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "The user interface is designed using HTML/JavaScript and rendered using integrated Chromium (Google's open-source project) based browser"

      'nuf said. Surely there are more wrong things wrong with that...

      Collecting passwords in a browser form field is fairly common, and not wrong.

      Spellchecking passwords? With a third party service? Sending in cleartext? Yeah, that's screwy ...

    2. Re:The Important part missing from TF Summary by itsme1234 · · Score: 1

      Collecting passwords in a browser form field is fairly common, and not wrong.

      This is not "a browser" ... or at least SHOULD NOT be, it is an app that would in principle exist in the very same form (at least from what I can see in the demos) even if the web was never invented. However it is/it does come with its own browser (like many other things nowadays!) - heck it's bigger than my first HARD DRIVE!

    3. Re:The Important part missing from TF Summary by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      Collecting passwords in a browser form field is fairly common, and not wrong.

      This is not "a browser" ... or at least SHOULD NOT be, it is an app that would in principle exist in the very same form (at least from what I can see in the demos) even if the web was never invented. However it is/it does come with its own browser (like many other things nowadays!) - heck it's bigger than my first HARD DRIVE!

      Plenty of apps use HTML/CSS/JS as the UI.

      That's not what's wrong with it, security-wise.

    4. Re:The Important part missing from TF Summary by Bongo · · Score: 1

      Oops, looks like I misspelt xg3/qqKsB-2zl

    5. Re:The Important part missing from TF Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just kids using Electron for their app probably. Electron apps each spin their own browser, imagine having multiple chromium based apps running on your phone at the same time each with their own version of chrome running!

    6. Re:The Important part missing from TF Summary by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

      It is screwy, and I know it's a minor thing, but can we be a bit more careful with the headlines?

      "Caught" implies they were doing it deliberately and trying to conceal the fact. This doesn't seem deliberate, just incompetent.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:The Important part missing from TF Summary by radarskiy · · Score: 2

      "This doesn't seem deliberate, just incompetent."

      Sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice.

    8. Re:The Important part missing from TF Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're using a lower case / when it should be upper case.

    9. Re:The Important part missing from TF Summary by Shikaku · · Score: 1

      It is technically a browser. https://electronjs.org/ This setup and environment uses a headless Chromium to basically be the application. One of the biggest projects that use this is Discord; it doesn't say Coinomi is in here https://electronjs.org/apps or Coinomi's webpage but it's possible. And considering Chrom(e)ium checks spelling on textfields this may have been unintentional since the browser has this feature but was accidentally trying to check the password field.

    10. Re:The Important part missing from TF Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have screwed it up in 2017 and handled it in a very unprofessional way:

      https://imnotdead.co.uk/blog/coinomi

  4. Pssword123 by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 4, Funny

    Psword123

    Did you mean "Password123"

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    1. Re:Pssword123 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're supposed to use special characters in passwords, so I tried with some asterisks:

      *******

      Did you mean "hunter2"

  5. I don't believe it by mattyj · · Score: 5, Funny

    A system of made-up currency run by any number of idiots in their virtual garages is shady? What? How could this possibly be?

  6. Passphrase alone not enough to steal funds. by Edward+Nardella · · Score: 1

    For coinomi, to make use of the passphrase, an attacker needs access to the phone.

    --
    My sig doesn't address Anons, sigs aren't visible to them.
    1. Re:Passphrase alone not enough to steal funds. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's apparently false, they allow non-2fa wallets.

    2. Re: Passphrase alone not enough to steal funds. by Edward+Nardella · · Score: 1

      It us true that they allow that, however, the keys are stored on the users device. Coinomi is not a cloud wallet.

      --
      My sig doesn't address Anons, sigs aren't visible to them.
  7. Google's spellchecker is pure evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My roommate sniffed my troll shitposts on 4chan. Even though I always used https, Google spellchecker in Chrome didn't.

    1. Re:Google's spellchecker is pure evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your girlfriend says she is getting real pissed off about your lack of commitment and how you keep calling her your roommate.

  8. All currency is "made-up" by Edward+Nardella · · Score: 0

    While there is some validity to your point, the use of "made-up" in yes context detracts from your credibility, all currency is "made-up". Next time use qualifiers that make what you're talking about distinct. Like saying that the currency is not backed by a nation.

    --
    My sig doesn't address Anons, sigs aren't visible to them.
    1. Re:All currency is "made-up" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for keeping the buttcoin record straight!

    2. Re:All currency is "made-up" by Calydor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Real-world currencies were originally backed by gold reserves and evolved from there.

      Cryptocurrencies were originally backed by geeks going, "It'll be the next big thing!" and haven't evolved yet.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    3. Re: All currency is "made-up" by Edward+Nardella · · Score: 1

      None of that is relevant to what has been said so far.

      --
      My sig doesn't address Anons, sigs aren't visible to them.
    4. Re:All currency is "made-up" by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      Actually, its backed by a lot of very complex math but go on.

    5. Re:All currency is "made-up" by Calydor · · Score: 1

      What is the value of the math itself as opposed to the value of the gold represented by real-world currency?

      At its very core, the ENTIRE concept of crypto-currency boils down to saying, "It would be pretty cool if we could make this work." And yes, it would. But that alone doesn't give it intrinsic value, and it doesn't give it the critical mass it requires to be considered a true currency on a level with the dollar, euro, yen, hell even the bolivar is more of a real currency - although for how long is debatable, true.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    6. Re:All currency is "made-up" by jythie · · Score: 1

      Going back further, gold as currency was also made up and took a leap of faith.... well, less a 'leap of faith' and more 'government will only accept taxes in gold and will only pay bills in the same'.

    7. Re:All currency is "made-up" by jythie · · Score: 1

      That is less 'backed' and more 'implemented by'.

    8. Re:All currency is "made-up" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Real-world currencies were originally backed by gold reserves and evolved from there.

      Thank you for the laugh! Your absolute lack of understanding of the history of money was the best laugh I've had all month.
      Please cite some where reputable that currency was EVER backed by gold reserves for more than a handful of years before collapsing in a pile of scandal and runaway inflation. I've been looking for a new humor site for awhile now.

  9. a bright new business opportunity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Annonymous Coward's password strength verifier!

    Here's a example of how it works:
    you : hey is this password strong?
    ACpsv : and you are?
    you : Joe Bloggs
    ACpsv : what site is this for?
    you : Fidelity.com
    ACpsv: yeah, sure, it's good.

  10. You cannot print your own money!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You cannot print your own money but you can issue your own cryptocurrency!!!
    You cannot print your own stocks but you can issue your own cryptocurrency!!!

    All kinds of cryptocurrencies need to be banned globally!!!

  11. READ BETTER - it is not sent in plaintext by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Coinomi has responded to the allegations in this post on Medium which states the spell checking functionality was enabled for desktop wallets but that the seed phrase wasn’t sent as plain text, it was “encapsulated inside a HTTPS request with Google being the sole recipient.” It added that Google did not process, cache or store the requests. The issue was fixed six days ago.

    A report by security consultant Warith Al Maawali claims he lost $60,000 to $70,000 while using the Coinomi wallet. He argues that Coinomi’s built-in spell checker automatically checked his seed phrase which involved sending it as plain text to a Google-owned website. This meant it could have been intercepted, leading to the loss of funds. There have been other similar claims on Reddit. While it’s difficult to verify if these claims are true, it does highlight a bigger vulnerability: seed phrases and the dangers of entering them on computers connected to the internet.

    Al Maawali told Decrypt he used his Ethereum seed phrase in the Coinomi wallet to access Ethereum-based tokens that he owned but were not supported by the Exodus crypto wallet which he was already using. He said everything worked okay at first as the tokens showed up but then a few days later, the wallet was emptied.

    Due to this, he did some research and found what he believes is a critical vulnerability within the Coinomi wallet. At the point where you enter your seed phrase, it is processed through a spell checker. This means the whole seed phrase is sent to a Google-owned website. He has uploaded a video for anyone to replicate the process and see that the vulnerability exists.

    Programmer Martin Habovtiak confirmed on Twitter that the vulnerability is real but argued that there might be more a more nefarious reason for the loss. Habovtiak believes it was more likely the money was stolen via malware, or Maawali sent the coins to another account he owns to make it look like they were stolen and is trying to double his money.

    However there have been other reports of funds disappearing on the Coinomi wallet—which isn’t uncommon for any software wallet. There are two posts on Reddit by users who claim their funds have disappeared from the Coinomi wallet. Although neither specify that they imported their seed phrase into the wallet.

    Al Maawali also provides screenshots of a conversation he claims to have had with Coinomi support in which they appear to accept the vulnerability exists but deny that it was responsible for the loss of funds. This conversation has not been independently verified.

    This issue flicks at other issues facing Coinomi. Luke Childs, a developer of open-source software accused the app of lacking necessary encryption measures when sending user information. A blog post by Jonathan Sterling, co-founder of Coin Flow, goes into more detail on the issues, providing screenshots of tweets allegedly from Coinomi dismissing the claims.

    While there is evidence that the exploit is real, it is much harder to verify that it was the reason the funds were stolen. There are many other possibilities of how the money was taken including malware or vulnerabilities in other crypto wallets—if it was even stolen. But this vulnerability proves that crypto wallet providers need to think outside the box when it comes to security, but not too much.

    [This article has been updated with the response from Coinomi.]

    https://decryptmedia.com/5414/alleged-coinomi-exploit-concern

    1. Re:READ BETTER - it is not sent in plaintext by Luthair · · Score: 1

      Even after sent to Google, you'd need a MTIM who somehow knew that to look at the contents of translate and know that it was for Etherum. Seems pretty far fetched.

    2. Re:READ BETTER - it is not sent in plaintext by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's exactly why the security researcher is correct that the more likely scenario is some type of malware or other situation.

  12. Intended purpose? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure it probably sent it in plain text to the spellchecker to make sure you weren't using a "common" password that could be susceptible to a Dictionary Attack, you know, for security.

  13. krypto kurrency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ahahaha krypto kurrency is for suckers.

  14. What a Bunch of Idiots! by organgtool · · Score: 1

    Everyone knows that you need to send the password over SSL to your own back-end service first before you send it to Google Spellcheck in clear text!

  15. Is the issue that the spell checker is not SSL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought Google was encrypting everything? Wondering which man in the middle attack he was hit with..

  16. What idiot thought up spellchecking passwords? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, what programmer is out there that would dream up such a scheme? I'm sure some lamers out there are gonna scream "password strength" checker. I'm call BULLSHIT on that. They could have made it slightly worse by also sending it to Facebook--just to see if was their login there, of course.

  17. Hosts files to the rescue YET again... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    0.0.0.0 redirector.gvt1.com
    0.0.0.0 gvt1.com
    0.0.0.0 googleapis.com

    * SOURCE https://www.avoid-coinomi.com/

    (Accept NO "Bolt-on-'MoAr'" ILLOGIC-LOGIC inferior substitutes that DO LESS & USE MORE + are LOADED w/ security issues (DNS/Antivirus) OR are 'souled-out' to advertisers (adblock) OR BEING KILLED BY Google (UBlock & other adblocking addons) https://www.bleepingcomputer.c... - As is, addons = easily detected & blocked by webmasters...)

    APK

    P.S.=> For the best hosts file multiplatform:

    APK Hosts File Engine 2.0++ 64-bit for Linux h t t p : / / a p k . i t - m a t e . c o . u k / A P K H o s t s F i l e E n g i n e F o r L i n u x . z i p (remove spaces between chars & download)

    APK Hosts File Engine 10++ SR-1 32/64-bit for Windows https://hosts-file.net/?s=Down... (DL link @ bottom)

    Soon for MacOS (I just got a NEW Mac-Mini to port it there)... apk

  18. BUT WHY CHECK THE SPELLING?????? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're all missing the point.

    In all the arguments about the seed/passphrase being sent to Google in plaintext or it was encapsulated in a HTTPS package, or Google does or doesn't log the passphrase, or that client-side Javascript is involved -- why is a spell checker even part of the process?

    If the spellcheck declares there is no misspelling does that indicate a dictionary word is being used and it should NOT be used as a passphrase? Is this why?

    1. Re:BUT WHY CHECK THE SPELLING?????? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pass phrases are usually real words, so I'm guessing it's checking that every one is spelt correctly. You may have intended "correct battery horse staple" but by accident entered "correct bsttery horse staple" and never be able to get into your account.

  19. this can happen post-hoc too by goombah99 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Example, you use a simple java swing text box to input some data. Then a new revision of java comes out and boom the text box gets new capabilies such as auto-fill or spell check.

    This exact scenario happened in one particular touch screen voting system in which the windows CE form boxes would remember the previous use of the form and fill it it. Unfortutaley it was filling it in with the previous voter's vote!
    But it wasn't that the software designer overlooked this. When the software is written it did not do this. But after an update of the Windows CE it did.

    Even changing things seeming innocuous like font definition files can introduce unanticipated changes post hoc.

    This is true of anything that uses either late binding, or an OS API.

    But you would be crazy to not use safe and validated things to be a window manager. Rolling your own would likely introduce even more prospects for security hazards.

    there isn't an easy answer.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re: this can happen post-hoc too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't have mod points but your scenario is enlightening and I'd never considered it before thank you.

    2. Re:this can happen post-hoc too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But it wasn't that the software designer overlooked this. When the software is written it did not do this. But after an update of the Windows CE it did.

      The designer used fucking Windows for a voting machine. That's like saying a designer who made a bridge out of toilet paper didn't overlook anything because during construction it wasn't raining.

    3. Re:this can happen post-hoc too by jythie · · Score: 1

      The thing that floors me in that story.. I used to work for a company that made touch screen based gaming systems, so something not nearly as important as voting machines.. and we were VERY meticulous about OS and library patches. An OS update like that should not be able to sneak up and have such an effect.

    4. Re:this can happen post-hoc too by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

      Heard the term "Good enough for government work!" ?

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    5. Re: this can happen post-hoc too by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      It's not just good, it's good enough!

    6. Re:this can happen post-hoc too by goombah99 · · Score: 1

      I can't tell you why they were sloppy but I can tell you a few things that might contribute.
      first, voting systems have some rules they follow. It varies from state to state but typically you are not allowed to alter any code in these things within a certain number of months of the election. This has led, more than once, to situations where a known bug (e.g. overflows of vote counts, or vulnerabilities) exists in the code but they cannot legally patch it. FOr systems used in federal elections they are/were supposed to get the blessing of the federal election assistance commissions which mandates code quality reviews (these are a total joke as they look at programming styles not logic) and that adds more time. IN fact vendors in two states were caught fixing bugs prior to elections and they knew they were no supposed. The problem is what do you do if the bug is really really awful? That'a why the vendors risked getting caught. One assumes this happens a lot and they don't get caught too.

      Second, voting machines don't make a lot of money compared to gaming. So there's a lot of corner cutting. More importantly, it's also a race to market. After states buy a brand of machine they are not going to switch to your brand for a decade. So late to market is death. Better to run with a crappy system. That's also presumably why these things have been built on things like windows CE and Windows Access data bases and commodity OEM computing platforms inside. Quicker to market. Security last.

      This you can see even if they did catch the problem they were hosed about getting it fixed promptly.

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  20. Architectural choices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There should be a term or phrase where people should consider all architectural choices as a title on slashdot before proceeding... "company X connects logins through clear text 1990's WAP phone"...

  21. Any idiot can do it ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My problem with apps is we seem to have this "any moron can do it" kind of attitude with software, where we end up with idiots and morons building software they aren't qualified to make.

    Me, I would say any cryptocurrency app pretty much has to be treated like it was rushed to market by idiots who don't know or care about security, they just want to get in the game. The other side of that coin is pretty much any mobile app has to be treated like it was rushed to market by idiots who don't know or care about security, they just want to get in the game.

    I would say the people who built this are complete fucking morons, con men, or both.

    Sadly, I would say people playing in an unregulated banking industry, trusting idiots and morons to safeguard their money without recourse ... these people are fucking idiots who deserve what they get.

    This isn't a bank, this isn't a financial institution, this is some random moron with an app offering to hold onto your money for you. Fuck man, you might as well have a homeless guy do it, he's just as qualified.

    People, you have no legal protections or assurances, why are you letting random assholes and idiots hold your money for you? If you don't know cryptocurrency is a completely unregulated financial market, you probably have no business being in the game.

    Me, I'm long past any sympathy for this shit ... it's self inflicted stupidity caused by you thinking you're going to get rich, and placing trust where you really have no basis to do so.

    You might as well leave a bag of money on your front porch.

  22. Re:Hosts files to the rescue YET again... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A day late and an APKoin short as always shit stick.

  23. Re: Hosts files to the rescue YET again... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Firefox and Chrome both ignore OS DNS resolution, retard. Firefox has done it since version 64, and uses Cloudflare.

  24. Easily gotten around... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    network.dnsCacheEntries 0
    network.trr.mode to 5 (SHUTS IT OFF)

    * For FireFox about:config entries to turn that "advertising machine" BS right the F off - & JEWgle's CHROME? Stay AWAY from it, period!

    APK

    P.S.=> So much for YOUR bs chump - I've always got a way around JEW advertiser bullshit - especially STUPIDLY subverting native OS & IP stack function (so they can infect/track/SLOW you via their crap)... apk

  25. Always EFFECTIVE vs. threats is more like it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:Always EFFECTIVE vs. threats is more like it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How nice of APK to publish a list of all the recent times that his work failed to prevent some threat. By the time he made those posts other more effective software had already dealt with it and that software didn't require any user intervention further showing how ineffective all of his efforts are. He even admits that it has failed even more times in the past.

    2. Re:Always EFFECTIVE vs. threats is more like it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks effective and natively.What other software is that? DNS or antivirus loaded with security problems or addons that don't work anymore like UBlock or Adblock? Apk does it not adding on more that adds more problems and resource usage.

  26. Re: Hosts files to the rescue YET again... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So Mozilla and Google made us vulnerable to these threats. What apk does is protect us against them dumbass!

  27. Re: Hosts files to the rescue YET again... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What apk does is protect us against them dumbass!

    No, what you, APK, do is refer to yourself in the 3rd person and reply to yourself to make it look like someone supports you. Then there are your antisemitic screeds that you posts. In reality none of APK's actions make you look sane or smart.

  28. Re: Hosts files to the rescue YET again... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Angry jew gets outsmarted hehehe. Now your racist anti-human beliefs: 1. Sanhedrin 59a: "Murdering Goyim (non-jew) is like killing a wild animal."

    2. Abodah Zara 26b: "Even the best of the Gentiles (non-jew) should be killed."

    3. Sanhedrin 59a: "A goy (Gentile) who pries into The Law (Talmud) is guilty of death."

    4. Yebhamoth 11b: "Sexual intercourse with a little girl is permitted if she is three years of age."

    5. Schabouth Hag. 6d: "Jews may swear falsely by use of subterfuge wording."

    6. Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Do not save Goyim in danger of death."

    7. Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Show no mercy to the Goyim."

    8. Choschen Hamm 388, 15: "If it can be proven that someone has given the money of Israelites to the Goyim, a way must be found after prudent consideration to wipe him off the face of the earth."

    9. Choschen Hamm 266,1: "A Jew may keep anything he finds which belongs to the Akum (Gentile). For he who returns lost property (to Gentiles) sins against the Law by increasing the power of the transgressors of the Law. It is praiseworthy, however, to return lost property if it is done to honor the name of God, namely, if by so doing, Christians will praise the Jews and look upon them as honorable people."

    10. Szaaloth-Utszabot, The Book of Jore Dia 17: "A Jew should and must make a false oath when the Goyim asks if our books contain anything against them."

    11. Baba Necia 114, 6: "The Jews are human beings, but the nations of the world are not human beings but beasts."

    12. Simeon Haddarsen, fol. 56-D: "When the Messiah comes every Jew will have 2800 slaves."

    13. Nidrasch Talpioth, p. 225-L: "Jehovah created the non-Jew in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The non-Jew is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew day and night."

    14. Aboda Sarah 37a: "A Gentile girl who is three years old can be violated."

    15. Gad. Shas. 2:2: "A Jew may violate but not marry a non-Jewish girl."

    16. Tosefta. Aboda Zara B, 5: "If a goy kills a goy or a Jew, he is responsible; but if a Jew kills a goy, he is NOT responsible."

    17. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 388: "It is permitted to kill a Jewish denunciator everywhere. It is permitted to kill him even before he denounces."

    18. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348: "All property of other nations belongs to the Jewish nation, which, consequently, is entitled to seize upon it without any scruples."

    19. Tosefta, Abda Zara VIII, 5: "How to interpret the word 'robbery.' A goy is forbidden to steal, rob, or take women slaves, etc., from a goy or from a Jew. But a Jew is NOT forbidden to do all this to a goy."

    20. Seph. Jp., 92, 1: "God has given the Jews power over the possessions and blood of all nations."

    21. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 156: "When a Jew has a Gentile in his clutches, another Jew may go to the same Gentile, lend him money and in turn deceive him, so that the Gentile shall be ruined. For the property of a Gentile, according to our law, belongs to no one, and the first Jew that passes has full right to seize it."

    22. Schulchan Aruch, Johre Deah, 122: "A Jew is forbidden to drink from a glass of wine which a Gentile has touched, because the touch has made the wine unclean."

    23. Nedarim 23b: "He who desires that none of his vows made during the year be valid, let him stand at the beginning of the year and declare, 'Every vow which I may make in the future shall be null'. His vows are then invalid."

    Jews view of non-jews (goy/goyim/gentiles) are above.

    ALL from their "book of law" the talmud.

    Jews claim anti-semitism when they are proven racists themselves from their own book of cultural laws the talmud shown in part above.

    Try "jew guilt" us?

    There's plenty in that link to their talmud cultural laws and their history to be guilty of. Jews = biggest racists of all for which they "jew guilt" you for no less!

    Hypocrites known as thieve

  29. obligatory XKCD https://xkcd.com/1700/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ranks up there with https://xkcd.com/1700/ doesn't it...

  30. Official response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coinomi's official response: https://medium.com/coinomi/official-statement-on-spell-check-findings-547ca348676b

    More than likely Al Maawali was trying to scam them..

  31. Re: Hosts files to the rescue YET again... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You stalk him constantly using unidentifiable anonymous posts. You have gall to say what you did.

  32. LEARN TO READ moron... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a PARTIAL LIST because /. omitted reports where hosts work vs. threats etc. & /. didn't report tons of others from security sites.

    I caught them & added the known bad sites to hosts to block MYSELF idiot!

    APK

    P.S.=> LEARN TO READ! apk