Any process for syncing cryptocurrency keys will probably use weaker security than the keys themselves and is therefore problematic on that basis alone. Also, no, I don't want to transmit my keys over the internet, I will copy them manually, as everyone handling anything more than pocket change should.
There are quite a few inefficiencies in current welfare programs that are not an issue in UBI. Have you run the numbers comparing the efficiency of each or are you just guessing?
While efforts may have been made by the editor at the time of publication to verify a lack of attempted attacks by that website, there is no guarantee that it would remain safe and plenty of reason to assume that it might not.
Most slashdot readers are probably not at risk, but not all are safe. I would have figured that the link in OP would be to a screenshot, but nope, it is directly to the compromised website. While efforts may have been made by the editor at the time of publication to verify a lack of attempted attacks by that website, there is no guarantee that it would remain safe and plenty of reason to assume that it might not. Isn't not spreading suspicious links and emails one of the first things we tell people when giving them basic internet safety advice?
There are numerous instances of streamers exposing things unintentionally, r/livestreamfails if you wanna see.
Just have two accounts on your PC. Or if you're paranoid, 2 OS installations.
It would be a miss if it affected all Gmail users. But it only affects a portion of them. Until the cause can be identified it is entirely reasonable to assume that this might not have come up in rigorous QA testing. And it is entirely unreasonable to assume that it should have come up in testing.
Slashdot Mirror
Any process for syncing cryptocurrency keys will probably use weaker security than the keys themselves and is therefore problematic on that basis alone. Also, no, I don't want to transmit my keys over the internet, I will copy them manually, as everyone handling anything more than pocket change should.
So, you haven't then.
That's actually an interesting point! I am going to have to remember that one.
That is not necessarily a problem.
There are quite a few inefficiencies in current welfare programs that are not an issue in UBI. Have you run the numbers comparing the efficiency of each or are you just guessing?
There are lots of stats on a wide variety of welfare programs. Most show an overall decrease in costs.
The ones who have read studies on the effects of welfare programs on government finances probable love it.
Interestingly, most welfare programs decrease total costs to the taxpayer.
Aside from the scaling issue, do you have any significant and credible evidence to back up what you're saying?
Do you have any stats to back up this assertion?
Good point, a national level test should be done.
How would you construct the study?
Good thing that doesn't happen most of the time.
Whose to say it won't?
Oh okay, the post was off topic then.
Actually it isn't, it is just a fancy way to say "your use of anecdotal evidence is flawed".
My grandmother smoked a pack a day since she was 14 and lived to be a hundred, guess everyone should start smoking.
I said generally, I didn't say always.
This is why you shouldn't connect your TV to the internet. In fact, you should generally avoid connecting things to the internet.
Whoops, still March where I am.
While efforts may have been made by the editor at the time of publication to verify a lack of attempted attacks by that website, there is no guarantee that it would remain safe and plenty of reason to assume that it might not.
Most slashdot readers are probably not at risk, but not all are safe. I would have figured that the link in OP would be to a screenshot, but nope, it is directly to the compromised website. While efforts may have been made by the editor at the time of publication to verify a lack of attempted attacks by that website, there is no guarantee that it would remain safe and plenty of reason to assume that it might not. Isn't not spreading suspicious links and emails one of the first things we tell people when giving them basic internet safety advice?
Animated ifs are great, gifs and jifs are silly.
There are numerous instances of streamers exposing things unintentionally, r/livestreamfails if you wanna see. Just have two accounts on your PC. Or if you're paranoid, 2 OS installations.
It would be a miss if it affected all Gmail users. But it only affects a portion of them. Until the cause can be identified it is entirely reasonable to assume that this might not have come up in rigorous QA testing. And it is entirely unreasonable to assume that it should have come up in testing.