Slashdot Mirror
More People Bought Physical CDs and Vinyl Than Songs on iTunes Last Year (bgr.com)
An anonymous reader quotes BGR:
Sales from individual song downloads have unsurprisingly been falling with no end in sight, thanks to the convenience of streaming options like Spotify and Apple Music. A new report, though, makes clear just how few people there are these days who will buy individual digital songs -- there are so few of them, in fact, that they were outnumbered in 2018 by people who went old-school and bought actual compact discs and vinyl records.
According to the Recording Industry Association of America, total download sales in 2018 -- for which iTunes led the pack -- dropped almost 30%, to a little more than $1 billion. Purchases of full album downloads likewise fell, by 25%. To put that in context, download sales represented more than 40% of the music industry's revenue back in 2013. Last year? About 11%.
Meanwhile, that drop in sales has resulted in a lop-sided reality that harkens back to the pre-iTunes days. Sales of physical media including CDs and vinyl, according to the RIAA's new report, were down 23 percent but totaled $1.15 billion, thus edging out digital download sales. Another interesting takeaway from the new report: Music fans bought almost $420 million worth of vinyl in 2018, which Cult of Mac notes in a piece today is almost as much as people spent buying album downloads from iTunes last year.
The RIAA reports that "virtually all the revenue growth" for 2018 came from streaming music platforms like Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon Music, and Tidal, which last year collectively added 1 million new subscribers every single month, and now have a record number of more than 50 million subscribers.
"By the way, don't be fooled into reading something positive about CDs from the title of this post," adds BGR. "While physical media sales were down 23%, CD sales themselves slipped 34% for the year to $698 million. That's the first time CD yearly revenue has come in below $1 billion since 1986."
According to the Recording Industry Association of America, total download sales in 2018 -- for which iTunes led the pack -- dropped almost 30%, to a little more than $1 billion. Purchases of full album downloads likewise fell, by 25%. To put that in context, download sales represented more than 40% of the music industry's revenue back in 2013. Last year? About 11%.
Meanwhile, that drop in sales has resulted in a lop-sided reality that harkens back to the pre-iTunes days. Sales of physical media including CDs and vinyl, according to the RIAA's new report, were down 23 percent but totaled $1.15 billion, thus edging out digital download sales. Another interesting takeaway from the new report: Music fans bought almost $420 million worth of vinyl in 2018, which Cult of Mac notes in a piece today is almost as much as people spent buying album downloads from iTunes last year.
The RIAA reports that "virtually all the revenue growth" for 2018 came from streaming music platforms like Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon Music, and Tidal, which last year collectively added 1 million new subscribers every single month, and now have a record number of more than 50 million subscribers.
"By the way, don't be fooled into reading something positive about CDs from the title of this post," adds BGR. "While physical media sales were down 23%, CD sales themselves slipped 34% for the year to $698 million. That's the first time CD yearly revenue has come in below $1 billion since 1986."
I've been getting way more into indie music genres, and by far my most used purchasing platform is now Bandcamp. DRM-free downloads, the ability to preview the entire track or album before buying, stream the purchased music on their mobile app, and the ability to download high-quality AIFF, WAV, FLAC, etc. formats for archivists and packrats like me. Any time I find a piece of music I want to buy, I always check Bandcamp first. iTunes is now my last resort for digital purchase.
If I love a piece of music enough that want to preserve it in my library, I want a CD for backup, even if most times I listen to it as bits on a device
I trust my backup abilities way more than I trust the cloud or streaming services
Most folks steam their music.
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
$10 a month, why would anyone want to pay $1 for one song?
Is that the 1% finally giving back to the rest of the world?
Believe it or not, old school is back in my house.
iPods, with Sound Docks (check, 30-pins are cheaper than dirt, good sound quality, easily repairable)
iTunes library on a NAS (check)
Plex Home Media Server on a NAS, (check)
Rasperry Pi with Hi Fi Berry as a player (check)
I love going on Ebay or to a local CD resale shop, finding media, bringing it home and putting it on the home media server then storing the media in the basement.
Streaming is great, but you can never seem to find what you want when you want it, or you have to rent/but it.
Streaming doesn't work it in the car, but the 128GB iPod works just fine with voice controls and playlists.
you can seriously pick them up anywhere from a few bucks, to a few bucks for a box full, to free sometimes.
When you want to buy music new on Amazon sometimes it's cheaper to buy the physical disk with "Auto-Rip" than it is to buy just the digital album.
Either way, I rip the disk to Ogg/Vorbis and keep it on my phone, and everything else I own. They still sound awesome, and unlike vinyl and tape media they still sound just as good today as the day the original owner bought them fifteen years ago even if they were played hundreds of times. (unless you bought from an ogre that didn't take care of them, then you can still sometimes run the polisher)
As far as I'm concerned buying a few used disks a month is cheaper than a bandwidth draining subscription service, and in time you'll have a better selection than they do anyways. Unless you like pop, in which case the cost and storage of your music isn't the first serious contemplation you need to make about your music.
The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
...10 year old smartphone.
Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
Sales in general - media or downloaded - is dead. It's streaming, making up 75% of music consumption. CDs, albums, online sales are duking it out to see who can be the winner of the irrelevancy segment.
Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
I subscribe to Apple Music which isn't a "purchase" but closer to rental. I find it is real fun to walk through old collections of 60s and 70s groups. But if and when I buy something, I buy a CD, DVD, blu ray. I have purchased a very few items via download but there are (still) all sorts of fears and problems. You get the idea that the purchase is "in the cloud" and will be there forever but that's not true for a number of reasons. There are also issues with transfer of ownership (as far as I know) and generally there are problems with loaning folks your copy of something.
No one uses iTunes anymore, its gone the way of CDs. And with modern technology, rightly so. There is no reason why music is so expensive when so many people want to play and there is nothing in the way of distribution anymore. The most you would need to pay for a reasonable setup for music is probably a few thousand dollars to make something half way decent that is good enough for most people.
The music files are sitting on your local machine, in AAC format, and are all DRM free. I'm not sure how you consider that "renting."
You can argue whether or not you care about having the data in uncompressed format, but beyond that, the argument seems a bit weak. They're both just digital bits on a physical medium.
Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
The headline says "More people bought physical CDs and vinyl than songs on iTunes" but the numbers given are "total download sales in 2018 [were] a little more than $1 billion", "Purchases of full album downloads likewise fell, by 25%", and finally "Sales of physical media... totaled $1.15 billion".
So are we talking about number of people, as said in the headline, or song sales, or album sales, or money?
I clicked through to the report and the most shocking thing to me was that people spent $25 million on ringtones and ringbacks in 2018.
As far as I can tell, the numbers don't account for any second-hand sales of physical media at all, which may not be a thriving market but also isn't trivial, at least in terms of unit sales. Money-wise, it's probably pretty low, due to high supply and low demand resulting in low prices.
Regardless of what they counted or how, I'm pretty sure most artists are still getting fucked.
Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
you don't really *buy* songs on iTunes, you rent them.
(Same as with any service that doesn't provide you with physical media.)
To be fair, music purchased on iTunes Store since 2009 has been delivered as DRM-free M4A (MPEG-4 AAC audio) files that play on numerous devices. You can back up these files to CD-R, DVD+R, or whatever other physical media you prefer.
But I use Amazon instead of iTunes for one reason: Amazon makes a downloader available as a web application that works in Firefox for X11/Linux. It thus runs on an x86-64 desktop or laptop computer or on an Arm-powered Raspberry Pi computer. Amazon also publishes a native downloader for Android. iTunes Store, on the other hand, relies on a native downloader application available only for macOS, Windows, and iOS, and the Windows version was incompatible with Wine last I checked.
If you take a "Modern" song, and try to put it in Vinyl, the moder equalization would make the needle jump out of the record. This is termed "Loudness Wars", and was made possible by the introduction of Digital Music (CD, DCC, MiniDisk, etc).
If the song you want was released in Vinyl AND the same mix was used for Vinyl, CD and digital download, you can feel free to get it in the media most convenient to you.
If, on the other hand, there are different mixes dependeng on the media, go for Vinyl, you will not get the most acurate reproduction, and there may be noise, but at least, you will get a hell of a lot better dynamic range in your song.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/0...
*** Suerte a todos y Feliz dia!
Because of bandwidth limits and payola, the selection of music streamed on FM radio tends to be noticeably inferior, particularly of less mainstream genres or recording artists not on major labels. Your favorite genre might not fit into the "format" (genre set) that existing stations follow. And even if you do find a station you enjoy, it won't follow you when you travel even domestically. In addition, paid plans for Internet streaming music services also lack ads and have on-demand functionality, as opposed to ads and forced multi-artist shuffle like FM and free Pandora.
You buy songs on iTunes, are you retarded?
No to both.
It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
Sure, I bought the songs, except when I updated my Mac, several songs were deleted without my consent or knowledge. I only found out after six months when I synced my iPhone and it reported that some of the songs were no longer available. Apparently this is a bug that goes back at least 2016 that has never been fixed. The songs are no longer associated with the albums that I bought, and the advice online was "you should have backed up your songs." Not very helpful advice after the fact. I have TimeMachine set up, but I wasn't able to go far enough back to restore the missing files. Now I have an album that jump from track 13 to track 16 because of the missing songs.
Yes, you buy the songs from Apple, but Apple can modify your iTunes library without informing you of the changes or requiring your consent. And despite Apple causing the files to be deleted, they are not responsible for any damages.
I regret making purchases through iTunes and having an iPhone, and an AppleTV, that is controlled by an external entity who can change the terms of service at any time.
Spotify (and I assume all the other streaming services) gives you the ability to add your own local music files so you can enjoy the best of both the streaming and playing local files. You can also download the tracks to your device for playback without any streaming, so you don't need to rely on the network in order to enjoy your music. You can even purpose an older device or cheap "burner" model and only come online once in awhile to update the library. It's ridiculous how many people here criticize the tech without having any knowledge whatsoever of what it's capabilities are. You have become as useless as my grandparents.
But a record, ahhh... that's tangible. Feel it. Smell it. The smell of library. The smell of history. The smell of many rounds of weed cleaned with licenses on the folds of an LP cover.
Run the Hunt EDA carbon fiber along the surface.
Brush off the dust bunnies off the stylus.
Hear the ker-thunk *plop* as the stylus settles into the groove.
Watch the the filaments in the KT-88 power tubes run their cheerful cherry orange. Ditty for the 12AX7s in the preamp. Smell it. Dust on hot glass.
Amaze yourself at the total lack of snap-crackle-pop, because you have a real turntable, not some made-in-china massmarket unit. No, you're running something German, from the mid-70's. When vinyl was the only game, really.
Streaming for convenience. Physical, tangible, for the foreverness.
I'm going to say this very carefully, very deliberately: Fuck... this modern world and its 100% fakeness. Fuck it long and hard, dry, with a very splintered phone pole.
There's *nothing* like that which you can hold, and store, and cherish, and long for, lust for. Fuck this fake digital modern world.
But truly, nothing beats the sheet music in front of you, with your barely-able fingers poised over the ebonies and ivories.
Fuck this modern world and those who worship at its altar.
There's still room for the old ways.
The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
If you can't sell it, you don't own it.
Dollars-to-donuts there's something in the TOS disallowing you from loaning, selling or giving the files away. The same terms would disallow inheritance, so your "purchase" dies with you.
It's got your fingerprint (account information) embedded so it can be easily traced back to you if you dare to loan, sell or give it away.
Even if the TOS didn't disallow it, good luck making a few bucks by selling your (or your inherited) unwanted music files to the used music store or online equivalent.
CDs get lost, burn up in fires, get scratch, lots of things happen. streaming services generally are a much better way to preserve the files.
You think that right up until your streaming service of choice suddenly drops some music you listen to often. There is more music than you think that can drift in and out of music service coverage... this has happened to my wife before.
With a CD, as long as you can read it once you are golden. Just digitize it yourself - using a service like iTunes Match even means you can still listen to it even if it's not on the streaming service the company offers. (not sure what companies besides Apple offer something like iTunes Match).
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
Something a big company can't find sinful.
Who wants to find their digital music fully curated due to politics?
Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
The data quoted by the OP, which comes from bgr.com, suggests that download sales fell precipitously in 2018, whilst physical CD and vinyl sales were less impacted, even though they, too, fell.
The linked article doesn't break down their headline numbers in to demographics, but when this topic is covered elsewhere, there is a stated generalization that download sales are driven more by milennials, whilst legacy formats are driven mainly by older consumers. [It's tempting to take this one step further and observe that there may be a direct correlation between the age of the buyer and the format purchased, but I'm less convinced by that].
So perhaps the data quoted is telling us something else, which is that maybe milennials cut back significantly on their music purchases last year? That, if substantiated, would be a much more interesting angle to cover, because that one element marks a significant change in trend. Then the question becomes: is that a one-off, or is that something deeper?
In a way it's a shame that formats like SACD and DVD-A didn't catch on in the same way that the video industry has managed a more successful transition from tape to DVD to BluRay to 4K. Perhaps this says more about our lifestyles [you actually have to sit still and watch a movie, whilst music can now be enjoyed "on the move" far more easily than ever before] than it does about our desire for higher quality music.
Last point - on the slip of CD sales... I still purchase physical CDs and will continue to do so for as long as they are available. However, if I can obtain it, I now prefer to purchase high definition audio (say 192-bit, 96kHz) if the mastered copies are being offered for sale. It would be interesting to know whether the data underpinning the bgr.com article includes these "hi-def" sales in their download numbers (given they are almost exclusively offered by specialist retailers). I know several music-enthusiast friends who are making the same switch when they can.
They only look to iTunes to come to this conclusion?
Maybe +5 years ago this was a somewhat ok-ish approach, but these days?
So many more and better (and cheaper) sites are available to purchase & download music from.
On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
the advice online was "you should have backed up your songs." Not very helpful advice after the fact. I have TimeMachine set up, but I wasn't able to go far enough
Apple Time Machine is version control, which isn't quite complete as backup. A reliable backup strategy needs to incorporate offline storage.
I think I can Spot(ify) the reason ...
When I buy a CD or Vinyl album the music is mine. I can make backup copies of it. I can lend it to friends. When I "buy" a digital copy of the music I am subject the terms and conditions or Apple or Amazon or whomever I get it from. They dictate the terms of usage. In that sense I don't really own the music. It's more like a local rental of the songs.
Given the choice I will either just stream the music or buy a physical copy of it.
Itunes - DRM and you can do next to nothing with your purchase and it's not transferable and if your hard drive dies, it doesn't exactly work like Steam. CDs - rip to MP3 and do anything, bring them anywhere, you have a physical backup, and any device can use them. It's an obvious choice.
HiFi Berry looks really interesting, thanks for sharing that. Do you have any feedback after having owned it? Particular model you would recommend? Would you purchase again?
When you own the physical copies, you can put the rips on your NAS and stream it to your heart's content without having to pay monthly fees.
See, that's the advantage of OWNING your media vs. RENTING it through streaming services. When you rent it (which is all streaming services is) you are at the mercy of their policies, including raising their monthly rates and/or removing items for whatever reason they see fit to give, or no reason at all. Let's see them do that with my physical copies.
And did I mention that I only pay for the music ONCE vs. monthly rental?
Beware of Sales Reps bearing gifts.
Until Apple pulls it from your HD like they've done to others in the past. Just sayin'....
Beware of Sales Reps bearing gifts.
If you go to iTunes and buy a song, you bought it. So yes, you have some mental problems. I have hundreds of songs from iTunes.
Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
So yes, you have some mental problems.
Being incorrect about something doesn't mean one has mental problems -- you judgmental ass. Several people pointed out that, while iTunes used to lock consumers in with DRM, they no longer do this. Sure, correct me because I was wrong -- that's fine -- but there's really no need to be a dick.
It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
And what would DRM have to do with owning a song you bought, or not owning it?
Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.