Slashdot Mirror


San Francisco's Rent Hits a New Peak of $3,690, Highest in the US (cnet.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: The median rent for a one bedroom apartment in San Francisco has reached a new peak of $3,690, according to survey data from Zumper, a home and apartment rental app. That's also a rise of nearly 9 percent from the same time last year, the survey found. Not only are those figures high enough to make your bank account cringe, but they're also nearly 30 percent higher than New York City and more than double the prices in Miami. Seattle, home to Amazon and Microsoft, rang in at $1,970 and Washington, DC, hit $2,150.

Oh, and by the way, while San Francisco's prices rose, the median price of one bedroom apartments across the US dropped nearly half a percent during this same time. That means while San Francisco's prices climbed, the country's prices fell. "Though there may be a ton of cash flowing through the city and surrounding areas soon, many of these workers will not immediately invest in a home and may, instead, take their money to both travel and upgrade their rental situation," Zumper wrote in a blog post Thursday.

9 of 314 comments (clear)

  1. This isn't hard to solve. by geekmux · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If your tech company cannot support remote work in the year 2019, then you're working for the wrong damn tech company.

    There's only one way you're going to get prices to revert to semi-reasonable levels in the Bay area; stop feeding that fucking stupidity.

    1. Re:This isn't hard to solve. by geekmux · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Some tech companies don't like you checking your email about 10:00 AM. Let's see wake up in pajamas. Watch some youtube videos, maybe twitter a bit. Maybe some early morning pr0n. Go to lunch. Check some more email about 1:00 PM. Watch some more pr0n. Maybe send some twitters out. Check some more emails. Stop doing anything related to work around 3:00 PM. This is what most work at home tech workers do. Productivity goes to hell yet these types of people manage to stay on the payrolls for months before they are weeded out. Then the cycle continues,

      Trying to preach the problems of managing remote workers is like trying to preach the problems of raising a 2-year old. Nothing is a surprise anymore, and if you haven't figured out yet how to properly manage an employee and hold them accountable, then it doesn't really matter how far away they are; you've already proven to be an incompetent manager.

    2. Re:This isn't hard to solve. by jwhyche · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If your tech company cannot support remote work in the year 2019, then you're working for the wrong damn tech company.

      Isn't this the damn truth. I drive 30 minutes to work every day, to sit in a office, and manage 6,500 virtual machines all around the world. I don't have to touch hardware any where because we rent space in data centers where they have their own tech-monkies do the hands on. I can do my job from my home just as well as the office. Hell, I can do it from the Starbucks down the road, or even the Starbucks mens room if I needed too.

      The only reason that most of us have to drive in is because we have to many PHB that don't understand the how the technical infrastructure works.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
  2. It's beyond ridiculous anywhere in California by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you live in California and pay rent you know what I mean. If I seriously have to consider downgrading my standard of living and look for a sublet somewhere and live out of a single room in someone else's house, then things have gone horribly wrong around here.

  3. Re:That's a contradiction by lgw · · Score: 4, Insightful

    NIMBY means there's not a free market; governments are preventing the market from operating.

    As the rent goes up, it becomes a lucrative business deal to buy up properties, demolish what's there, and build housing. That's what a free market would lead to, but that's not allowed to happen.

    Calling it "the government" just hides the blame. Existing property owners are blocking new construction. And no wonder: the value of their property skyrockets thereby.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  4. Re:You're wrong. They ARE being forced. by shess · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How is anyone forced to live there?

    If you can afford that rent, you can afford a bus ticket out of there.

    And that's EXACTLY what's happening. Folks are leaving both the cities AND the state because it's too expensive to live there. They are heading to places where the cost of living is lower. Places like Texas, Florida and other places where an $800K house isn't a two bedroom shack.

    Wait, so people are moving away in droves, and prices continue to rise! That's crazy! It goes against pretty much everything written about supply and demand! Imagine how much apartments will cost when EVERYONE has moved away!

  5. Re:That's a contradiction by JackieBrown · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And they can keep their significant economy.

    What good is making more money than red states when 1 bedroom apartments costs $3,690? That is more than 3 times the cost of apartments in San Antonio. And no, your minimum wage is not 3 times higher than minimum wages in San Antonio.

  6. Re:Most expensive? Or most unaffordable? by DogDude · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yup, both you and the parent are right. It IS out of whack. But in the US, we've collectively decided that we're a dog-eat-dog country, and we don't let the government intervene to help people (or even regions). It sucks, but wealth concentration is inevitable if you let capitalism go unchecked for long enough.

    I think it's a terrible system (or lack of a system), so I vote to change it, and I'm going to continue to vote to change the system until I eventually leave the country for somewhere more civilized.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  7. Re:That's a contradiction by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And they can keep their significant economy.

    What good is making more money than red states when 1 bedroom apartments costs $3,690? That is more than 3 times the cost of apartments in San Antonio. And no, your minimum wage is not 3 times higher than minimum wages in San Antonio.

    Minimum wage is not enough to pay for a home in the most desirable part of any City. Typically only the most well off live in the most expensive areas. Plenty of Californians CAN afford their mortgage and rent with money left to spare, because the wages are higher (and/or they live out of the most expensive areas).

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch