Slashdot Mirror


Firefox To Add Tor Browser Anti-Fingerprinting Technique Called Letterboxing (zdnet.com)

Mozilla is scheduled to add a new user anti-fingerprinting technique to Firefox with the release of version 67, scheduled for mid-May this year. "Called 'letterboxing,' this new technique adds 'gray spaces' to the sides of a web page when the user resizes the browser window, which are then gradually removed after the window resize operation has finished," reports ZDNet. From the report: Advertising networks often sniff certain browser features, such as the window size to create user profiles and track users as they resize their browser and move across new URLs and browser tabs. The general idea is that "letterboxing" will mask the window's real dimensions by keeping the window width and height at multiples of 200px and 100px during the resize operation -- generating the same window dimensions for all users -- and then adding a "gray space" at the top, bottom, left, or right of the current page.

The advertising code, which listens to window resize events, then reads the generic dimensions, sends the data to its server, and only after does Firefox remove the "gray spaces" using a smooth animation a few milliseconds later. In other words, letterboxing delays filling the newly-resized browser window with the actual page content long enough to trick the advertising code into reading incorrect window dimensions.
The feature was first developed for the Tor Browser, and can be seen in action here. In order to enable the feature in Firefox, "users will first need to visit the about:config page, enter 'privacy.resistFingerprinting' in the search box, and toggle the browser's anti-fingerprinting features to 'true,'" reports ZDNet.

4 of 101 comments (clear)

  1. resources by sad_ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    people wonder why are todays computers, which are so powerful, so slow?
    well, this is the answer, first you have code running trying to identify who you are, then you have code running that tries to trick the other code detection mechanism. many cpu cycles are lost.

    cpu cycles are not the only wasted resource, mind you. there is also somebody coding all this stuff, which otherwise perhaps could have been implementing really cool things.

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  2. Whitelisting by DrYak · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Saddly it seems that whitelisting Javascript (e.g.: the Firefox NoScript extension) and keeping it to the bare strict minimum required to successfully display a web page is the only practical way to avoid/diminish the online tracking.

    Luckily, it seems that nearly all the web rely on 3rd party libraries to do the tracking and thus blocking 3rd party libraries and only allowing select few helps increasing the protection against tracking.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Whitelisting by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Whitlisting Javascript won't actually protect you from this, not entirely. For example the site can use CSS to load a different resource based on your browser window size, which the server can log along with your IP address.

      It's extremely difficult to block everything that could be used to identify a browser. A better technique is to poison the data, making it unreliable and ever-changing.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  3. Re:Well it's a step by Joce640k · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A long way to go, but I like this direction.

    Really? Firefox is still sending a stupidly detailed user-agent string, exact model of graphics card, list of plugins, list of installed fonts, screen resolution, time zone, etc.

    Hell, even your "Do Not Track" setting is useful to the people who want to track you - some people enable it, some people don't. Imagine that, a privacy-enhancing feature that decreases your privacy.

    --
    No sig today...