Slashdot Mirror


A 60 Minutes Story on Gender Equality Accidentally Proved the Persistence of Patriarchy (qz.com)

Over at Quartz, Ephrat Livni reports that a 60 Minutes story about gender equality accidentally proved the persistence of patriarchy. Reader theodp shares the report: Good intentions are nice, but they aren't enough, the TV news show 60 Minutes recently proved. The show's producers apparently meant well when they decided to do a segment on women in technology and the gender gap, which aired on March 4. But they ended up punching women in the gut, as the founder and CEO of Girls Who Code, Reshma Saujani, puts it in her response to the segment. Ultimately, 60 Minutes featured a man, Code.org CEO Hadi Partovi. His [tech-backed] organization's mission is to expand access to computer science education in schools.

Women technologists like Saujani who were tapped to appear on the show about a year ago and worked with producers to provide research and interviews, ended up on the cutting room floor while Partovi spoke on their behalf. Here is the cruel irony: As a result, 60 Minutes' segment was accidentally exceptionally effective-it proved that women in tech really can't catch a break. [...] Ayah Bdeir, the founder of STEM learning toy company littleBits, also responded to the episode in a Medium post. She noted that she worked with 60 Minutes for a year, planning interviews, providing research, talking to the producers and reporters, telling her story and that of her organization, which is focused on closing the gender gap in technology. Yet producers wrote to her last August to say that the focus of the segment had shifted and that littleBits would no longer be central in the story. In an email, a producer explained to her, 'It's not that the important points you made in your interview are ignored in the story, or that you didn't make them very effectively, they're just made by others'.

7 of 529 comments (clear)

  1. Does this mean.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Orange man bad?

    1. Re: Does this mean.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Nope, Trump is exonerated because he ordered the government to stop releasing reports on its gender inequities, meaning he is totally not discriminating against women.

      Besides, he gave Ivanka a gold-plated security clearance, so obviously he respects all women. Not just ones with a nice ass like his daughter. Who he gave a security clearance. Because she is his daughter. The one with the nice ass.

  2. Blame it on GitHub! by DickBreath · · Score: 3, Funny

    This male dominated industry never ceases to amaze me with their constant "pull requests".

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    1. Re:Blame it on GitHub! by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 3, Funny

      This male dominated industry never ceases to amaze me with their constant "pull requests".

      But... it was just my finger!

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:Blame it on GitHub! by thomn8r · · Score: 3, Funny

      Actually you need to push and merge for 20 minutes or so, and then the pull request

  3. Re:Hypocrisy of the Media by DickBreath · · Score: 1, Funny

    The basis of my lawsuit is that I went to Playboy.com to read the great articles.

    But those women were sexually assaulting me and creating a hostile environment by exposing their bodies on adjacent pages.

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  4. Re:SJW DOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    There is also no place for legitimate scientific discussion of the flat Earth model or evolution.