Slashdot Mirror


Encouragement Without Education Backfires On Recycling Efforts (gizmodo.com)

Longtime Slashdot reader Alok writes: High contamination in recycled garbage, such as plastic bags mixed in with the recyclable plastic waste, are causing major problems for sustainability efforts in U.S. This has been exposed as a big problem recently, due to recent stricter China import rules on importing waste materials that led to changes in the sourcing pipelines. Cities such as Philadelphia have ended up processing nearly half of the recycling garbage using waste-to-energy incinerators instead, where they're being burned alongside garbage. "Today, the average U.S. recyclable load is about 25 percent contaminated," reports Gizmodo. "To make their commodities saleable, material recovery facilities started hiring more 'pickers' and buying more equipment to remove items that shouldn't be in the recycling, in addition to slowing down their processing lines." [C]ommunities like Philadelphia are going have to generate cleaner material that is more marketable," Scott McGrath, Environmental Planning Director at the City of Philadelphia Streets Department, said, adding that the city will be focusing more of its efforts on educating residents about what can and cannot be recycled. McGrath said if Philly can convince residents to stop tossing plastic bags in the recycling bin, that alone would be a big deal.

Anne Germain, Vice President of Technical and Regulatory Affairs at the National Waste and Recycling Association, an industry trade group, said public education was something the recycling industry as a whole had let slide over the years. "We were more about encouraging recycling than saying stop doing this or that," she said. This, combined with the widespread adoption of single stream, has made the public increasingly enthusiastic about throwing everything in their blue bins, resulting in a lot of what Center for American Progress representative Kristina Costa calls "aspirational recycling," or attempting to recycle garbage. "Once you start saying more and more materials are acceptable, it seems that a lot of people start to think everything is acceptable," Germain said, adding that the increased complexity of packaging today compared with a few decades ago has only added to the confusion.

10 of 220 comments (clear)

  1. So let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You want me to use clean water...which is scarce enough that it has its own problems...to wash my garbage so someone can make money off of it by selling it to China? If you want to sell my garbage, you find a way to clean it yourself.

    1. Re:So let me get this straight... by jrumney · · Score: 4, Insightful

      China doesn't want your rubblish any more. That is why plastic bags mixed in with the other more valuable recyclable plastics have suddenly become a problem.

    2. Re:So let me get this straight... by rtb61 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That is the silly way, the smart way, create a consortium of the right industries to work on ways to make recycling far more industrial in approach. The most appropriate companies, mining and refining companies. How to effectively mine and refine the resources out of garbage. The series of processing steps, to make processing it workable and it what order to extract resources and how to do so. Mining and refining are skilled in this and need to put their heads together to how to most effectively process the mountain of garbage to product stock piles of immediately usable resources. Using renewable energy to renew resources to make the usable again.

      Everything in that garbage pile started out as a high priced resource and getting those resources out of that garbage pile and making them usable again is what it is all about.

      Needs some real sit down and thinking and planning and research, core stuff, so ZERO WASTE cities can become a thing and mining/refining companies can bid for a cities waste resources.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    3. Re:So let me get this straight... by serviscope_minor · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The price reflects the total resources something is worth to someone else

      The price does not reflect externalised costs.

      Where recycling and reusing actually makes economic sense, no one has to create a government program for it, nor fine people for not doing it.

      It made good economic sense to polllute rivers to the point where they could catch fire.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Government programs and fines were necessary to stop people doing something which to them made "good economoc sense".

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    4. Re: So let me get this straight... by orlanz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So what you are saying is that the initial purchase price should have a "disposal" tax that covers its disposal/recycling.

  2. Single Stream is at fault by winhill2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We used to carefully sort and fill multiple recycling containers with paper, glass, metal, etc. But then they wanted to have only one pickup container, and call it single-stream. So now we're supposed to throw everything in there together. What did they expect?

    1. Re:Single Stream is at fault by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wider adoption, poorer quality. Hard to know where the trade off ends. At 75% recovery for 3x participation, it might not be a bad deal.

      What gets me is the variability by region. One place wants anything they can’t burn to be considered hazardous waste, another is obsessed over bottle caps compared to the town next door; it simply isn’t a logical process.

      Hopefully education can help address indifference by many people.

  3. Blame Enviro Whackos for that by Crashmarik · · Score: 1, Insightful

    We used to have paper bags that were made from trees grown for the purpose but that upset some people.
    So you had a whole bunch of people that felt really good about getting them banned.

    Oops fewer tree farms bu now we have lots waste plastic bags that are nearly useless to begin with and can't be reused at all.

    1. Re:Blame Enviro Whackos for that by uncqual · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Plastic bags, for the same volume, also are lighter and less bulky. This makes them cheaper to transport and require less place for storage and less frequent restocking at the check stands.

      Plastic bags also don't weaken when they get moist either from being set on a wet surface or because something inside leaks or condenses due to high humidity.

      Not to say these makes them worthwhile, but those are advantages.

      --
      Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
  4. Around here recycling is a second truck run. by Fly+Swatter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Save the environment by running twice as many fuel burning trucks to pick it up... Every bill increase is blamed on 'increased recycling costs'... The whole thing is a mess and a boondoggle.