Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Rolls Out New Skype for Web; Does Not Support Firefox, Safari, and Opera (venturebeat.com)

Microsoft this week revamped Skype's browser-based client with a slew of new features. From a report: The Seattle company this week announced the rollout of a major Skype for Web update, which introduces high-definition video calling, a redesigned notifications panels, a revamped media gallery, and more. It's available on any PC running Windows 10 and Mac OS X 10.12 or higher with the latest versions of Google Chrome or Microsoft Edge. The bulk of the new capabilities debuted in preview last October, but they're available widely starting this week. Skype for Web does not support Safari, Firefox, and Opera browsers, Microsoft has confirmed.

10 of 97 comments (clear)

  1. The Chrome Overlord by markdavis · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So much for open web standards, privacy, and freedom of choice and platform. The march back to the days of IE are progressing so well. I am sure Google is very pleased, indeed.

    I don't know about you, but I will continue to fight it. If a site doesn't at least work on Firefox, it is BROKEN.

    1. Re:The Chrome Overlord by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It doesn't even support Windows 8.1 or below fully.

      Apparently it doesn't support other browsers because it needs a plug-in that uses the Chrome/Edge architecture. They didn't make one for Firefox.

      So actually it's useless for me too, because even though I use Chrome I'm not installing their plug-in.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  2. Re:How to kill your own product... by Guspaz · · Score: 3, Funny

    Good thing this supports Chrome, then.

  3. Re:How to kill your own product... by postbigbang · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That great ongoing support for all things open source... seems to have failed here. Firefox is the default browser in many Linux distributions.

    So nice for Microsoft to think of themselves first, to the exclusion of anyone else.

    And so you twits that have succumbed to the great haze of Microsoft's support of open source, know that it's only capitulation to FOSS, and not actually ascribing to the culture of the communities of FOSS.

    Embrace, extend, extinguish is still their DNA. If they really wanted to make headway, they'd make Skype an API and spawn lots of products made from its bones, so as to curtail advances from Google, FB, and other international social media competition.

    There are MBAs in Redmond that truly don't understand how to make dough in FOSS, understand how to bring markets to their fore through transformative yet open infrastructure. Same old song and dance.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  4. Chrome is the new IE by sremick · · Score: 4, Informative

    This article warrants reposting here:

    https://www.theverge.com/2018/...

  5. What does skype do that webTRC doesn't? by goombah99 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I stopped using skype since webRTC became built into browsers. no apps to install, works reliably. Works on more devices than skype.

    The best part is that when you have an ad hoc group of people who suddenly need to chat you don't have any dely with people installing an application then coaxing it to work, signing up for a microsoft account etc... Installing all the other spy ware microsoft forces you to install with it.

    And while not every webRTC provider is equally good, and bug free, there are some very good ones, and that's all you need. I like appear.in

    The downer for me is that my employer blocks webRTC ports forcing the use of skype. ugg.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  6. Issue about this on webcompat by tepples · · Score: 3, Informative

    I went to file this on webcompat.com, but it looks like it's already been filed as #27392.
    View on webcompat | View on Microsoft GitHub

  7. Consider it innovation by SuneSpeg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Destroying the Skype platform isnt easy. MS are close to have exhausted possibilities for ruining this product which was once great..before MS bought it.. Splitting it into private and skype for business was bold, suddenly you had 2 fragments. Then they destroyed the manager so Skype for business suddenly became Skype for employees that work in a company that previously used Skype, because no sane company would implement a solution with a crippled central management. Then MS took the liberty to turn Skype into Teams..which is like replacing a Ghettoblaster with a piece of toilet paper, great for each purpose but not a replacement... So whoever came up with this broken browser solution, really had to think and innovate, to find the last ways to ruin Skype, I think people should appreciate that!

  8. Re:How to kill your own product... by postbigbang · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Your understanding of FOSS is typical, and it's pretty myopic. This context doesn't allow you to understand that there are motives in FOSS beyond pecuniary interest. It's not a business model. If you can wrap your head around that fact, and get it out of your wallet, you can get closer to the actual context.

    What's-in-it-for-me is a natural desire. How-can-I-help is a more evolved thought process. You can make money both ways.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  9. Opera by darkain · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How does it *NOT* support Opera? It is literally the same codebase as Chrome (both Blink/Chromium based), the same thing the new Edge is being based on. This means they're checking user agents, and denying ones they don't like. This is 2019, not 1999. STOP THIS SHIT RIGHT NOW.