Slashdot Mirror


MGM Considers Replacing Workers With Robots In Its Las Vegas Strip Properties (vegasslotsonline.com)

MGM, one of the largest global casino companies in the world, is considering replacing some workers with robots. The company's 2020 plan calls for reducing its workforce by about 2,100 people to save roughly $300 million in the coming years. Vegas Slots Online reports: Among those who could be replaced are cashiers and bartenders. Automatic technology that can make drinks would replace the bartenders and monetary transactions could be done through standard payment technology. There would also be mobile payment processors going around the floor with the wait staff, eliminating the need for cashiers. There is no indication as to how many such jobs would be replaced at the MGM properties. The unions and workers will not be happy with this news. Jobs will be lost and it may also violate the labor agreement that MGM struck with the unions last summer. The Las Vegas Culinary Union (LVCU), which represents bartenders, kitchen staff, and wait staff, reached a five-year deal in June 2018 with the MGM. The agreement guarantees that MGM will not implement any technology that would have a negative impact on employment. However, the news that the MGM is considering replacing some workers with robots could mean that the company is not willing to fulfill this agreement. MGM CEO Jim Murren unveiled the new "MGM 2020" plan earlier this year, describing it as a "company-wide, business-optimization initiative aimed to leverage a more centralized organization to maximize profitability and, through key investments in technology, lay the groundwork for the company's digital transformation to drive revenue growth."

21 of 106 comments (clear)

  1. Robot strippers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's what you all think.

    1. Re:Robot strippers. by DickBreath · · Score: 3, Funny

      But who would the robots strip?

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    2. Re:Robot strippers. by Darinbob · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Come on in, this is the show you want! Twenty Four Hours Live! You'll wear out before these bots do! You'll see circuit boards, you'll see interconnects, gaskets will be removed and polarities will be swapped before your eyes! We've got home models, we've got industrial models, we've got this year's releases and we've got outdated models for the specialty customers, we've got what YOU want to see! You can swipe left and you can swipe right, just be sure you are properly grounded when you come to the show!"

    3. Re:Robot strippers. by GrumpySteen · · Score: 2

      Someone already built one, so it's not impossible.

      Aside from all the less savory aspects of that particular piece of art, watch the way the hands move. The guy who built it nailed the movement of human hands better than any other robot I've seen. I wish artificial limb replacements could be made so realistic.

    4. Re:Robot strippers. by Krishnoid · · Score: 2

      "I don't like it here. It's 110 degrees and there's very little oxygen."
      "Shut up and hoot."

    5. Re:Robot strippers. by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 3, Funny

      They know what you like and can do it to within a tolerance of ten microns!

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  2. Simple Solution by IonOtter · · Score: 2

    If they want to replace the taxpaying workers with robots, then municipalities should tax each robot at a rate commensurate with the wages they would have lost from employees living in the area.

    There's nothing wrong with replacing people with robots?

    But there is most *definitely* something wrong with doing so when it screws everyone but the elite few at the top.

    --
    [End Of Line]
    1. Re:Simple Solution by ghoul · · Score: 4, Interesting

      We have had this debate once before. The Southern states wanted apportionment according to their population including slaves. The northern states wanted apportionment according to voters. They reached a compromise 3/5th. Lets do the same. All Robots will be assumed to have at least the minimum wage and 3/5th of that will be taxed at personal tax rates on the owner of the company. Wages not profits. Its easy to show zero or negative profits but no of robots * min wage *2000 hours *.6. Thats an easy formula and tax at personal income tax rates. If someone says robots dont take as many resources as people say thats why its taxed at 3/5ths.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    2. Re:Simple Solution by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      municipalities should tax each robot at a rate commensurate with the wages they would have lost from employees living in the area.

      Everyone with a dishwasher can pay taxes for the scullery maid they didn't hire.

      We should also tax every phone with a keypad, since no switchboard operator is being paid.

      Printed books should be taxed to make up for the unemployed scribes.

    3. Re:Simple Solution by Kris_J · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or countries could actually tax businesses properly.

    4. Re:Simple Solution by timeOday · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There is no meaningful way to define what a "robot" is, certainly not for purposes of replacing people. A self-checkout at the grocery store? A soda fountain at McDonald's? A big tractor on a farm that does what 120 peasants did at one time, or 30 sharecroppers with mules? Restricting it to anthropomorphic robots that correspond to 1 human would accomplish nothing, we keep imagining robots that way and they keep not being like that.

  3. Tips by ghoul · · Score: 2

    The casino industry works on tips. No one is going to tip a robot waitress or robot dealer. Their non tip wages are probably the same as the maintenance cost of the robots.

    --
    **Life is too short to be serious**
    1. Re:Tips by bobstreo · · Score: 2

      The casino industry works on tips. No one is going to tip a robot waitress or robot dealer. Their non tip wages are probably the same as the maintenance cost of the robots.

      Totally agree. Also sexual harassment of cocktail waitresses will be eliminated, except for the drunken robosexuals.

    2. Re:Tips by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      No customer at a casino wants to interact with a robot.

      The casinos are chock-full of people sitting around pumping money into slot machines. You really think those people will give a shit if their free drinks come from a robot? They're already glued to one.

      nobody who knows anything about drinking ever wants a drink measured by a machine.

      If you knew anything about drinking, you'd know that most properties are already using measured shots. They've got pour nozzles that do it automatically.

      That goes double when said machine gets to decide when you get to have a free drink in the first place

      That's already how it works in many properties, and I'd be surprised if that wasn't how it worked at every MGM property already.

      The bottom line is if you give me machines to interact with, I can just stay home.

      You've got slot machines in your home?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  4. Incremental by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's sort of the problem. 2100 jobs isn't much in the vast scheme of things. But every company on earth bigger than a mom & pop is trying to figure out how to do this. And it's not just automation. It's stuff like better tech (portable payment devices that are cheap enough and reliable enough so you can have the girls handling out drinks replace your cashiers).

    It'll be the death of a thousand cuts. Eventually the job losses will put downward pressure on wages, then on sales, and then more layoffs and it'll spiral down. It's a classic race to the bottom. The only thing that can stop it is human reason and action from outside the system.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  5. Robots can be fun by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was on a cruise recently that had a robot bar - it was pretty well designed, as you used a tablet o order whatever kind of drink you wanted out of the different bottles of spirits and non-alcoholic drinks it had... it was pretty well designed, and built to be "showy" if you will as it prepared drinks. It was one of the more interesting things on the ship...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Robots can be fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I hope the doctors were able to reattach it.

    2. Re:Robots can be fun by ghoul · · Score: 2

      +1 Funny.

      I wish I hadnt commented on this thread so I could have spent my 15 moderator points upvoting this

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    3. Re:Robots can be fun by Harald+Paulsen · · Score: 2

      Was recently on Harmony of the Seas, one of the ships with this robot bar. Sure, it is fun once, but the novelty wears off. Especially when you find bugs in the system like being out of orange juice. A human would notice!

      However, I will say that I got a more consistent cocktail from the robot than the humans. That however is down to training.

      --
      Harald
  6. Millions more can also be saved by quonset · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If Jim Murren is let go and replaced by a robot, that's another $14 million each year which can be saved, and that's in salary alone. Add in all the other perks he gets and that number could be near $20 million.

    In one fell swoop, and additional 6.66% could be saved of the total amount. And it could be done immediately.

  7. Re:If it's all automated, then why go to LV? by djinn6 · · Score: 2

    You do realize gambling is illegal in most places right? Gambling on an electronic slot machine doesn't make it any more legal.