Slashdot Mirror
MGM Considers Replacing Workers With Robots In Its Las Vegas Strip Properties (vegasslotsonline.com)
MGM, one of the largest global casino companies in the world, is considering replacing some workers with robots. The company's 2020 plan calls for reducing its workforce by about 2,100 people to save roughly $300 million in the coming years. Vegas Slots Online reports: Among those who could be replaced are cashiers and bartenders. Automatic technology that can make drinks would replace the bartenders and monetary transactions could be done through standard payment technology. There would also be mobile payment processors going around the floor with the wait staff, eliminating the need for cashiers. There is no indication as to how many such jobs would be replaced at the MGM properties. The unions and workers will not be happy with this news. Jobs will be lost and it may also violate the labor agreement that MGM struck with the unions last summer. The Las Vegas Culinary Union (LVCU), which represents bartenders, kitchen staff, and wait staff, reached a five-year deal in June 2018 with the MGM. The agreement guarantees that MGM will not implement any technology that would have a negative impact on employment. However, the news that the MGM is considering replacing some workers with robots could mean that the company is not willing to fulfill this agreement. MGM CEO Jim Murren unveiled the new "MGM 2020" plan earlier this year, describing it as a "company-wide, business-optimization initiative aimed to leverage a more centralized organization to maximize profitability and, through key investments in technology, lay the groundwork for the company's digital transformation to drive revenue growth."
"Come on in, this is the show you want! Twenty Four Hours Live! You'll wear out before these bots do! You'll see circuit boards, you'll see interconnects, gaskets will be removed and polarities will be swapped before your eyes! We've got home models, we've got industrial models, we've got this year's releases and we've got outdated models for the specialty customers, we've got what YOU want to see! You can swipe left and you can swipe right, just be sure you are properly grounded when you come to the show!"
We have had this debate once before. The Southern states wanted apportionment according to their population including slaves. The northern states wanted apportionment according to voters. They reached a compromise 3/5th. Lets do the same. All Robots will be assumed to have at least the minimum wage and 3/5th of that will be taxed at personal tax rates on the owner of the company. Wages not profits. Its easy to show zero or negative profits but no of robots * min wage *2000 hours *.6. Thats an easy formula and tax at personal income tax rates. If someone says robots dont take as many resources as people say thats why its taxed at 3/5ths.
**Life is too short to be serious**
That's sort of the problem. 2100 jobs isn't much in the vast scheme of things. But every company on earth bigger than a mom & pop is trying to figure out how to do this. And it's not just automation. It's stuff like better tech (portable payment devices that are cheap enough and reliable enough so you can have the girls handling out drinks replace your cashiers).
It'll be the death of a thousand cuts. Eventually the job losses will put downward pressure on wages, then on sales, and then more layoffs and it'll spiral down. It's a classic race to the bottom. The only thing that can stop it is human reason and action from outside the system.
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
I was on a cruise recently that had a robot bar - it was pretty well designed, as you used a tablet o order whatever kind of drink you wanted out of the different bottles of spirits and non-alcoholic drinks it had... it was pretty well designed, and built to be "showy" if you will as it prepared drinks. It was one of the more interesting things on the ship...
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
There is no meaningful way to define what a "robot" is, certainly not for purposes of replacing people. A self-checkout at the grocery store? A soda fountain at McDonald's? A big tractor on a farm that does what 120 peasants did at one time, or 30 sharecroppers with mules? Restricting it to anthropomorphic robots that correspond to 1 human would accomplish nothing, we keep imagining robots that way and they keep not being like that.