Slashdot Mirror


Japanese Police Charge 13-Year-Old Girl For Sharing 'Unclosable Popup' Code Online (zdnet.com)

"Japanese police have brought in, questioned, and charged a 13-year-old female student from the city of Kariya for sharing [links to] browser exploit code online," writes ZDNet. An anonymous reader shares their report: The code was a mere prank that triggered an infinite loop in JavaScript to show an "unclosable" popup when users accessed a certain link, Japanese news agency NHK reported yesterday. The popup could be closed in some browsers -- such as Edge and Firefox on desktop -- but couldn't be closed in others, such as Chrome on desktop and the majority of mobile browsers.

The popup was hosted in several places online, and police say the teenager helped spread the links... The teenage girl did not create the malicious code, which had been shared on online forums by multiple users for the past few years. NHK reported that police also searched the house of a second suspect, 47-year-old man from Yamaguchi, and are also looking at three other suspects for the same "crime" of sharing the link on internet forums.

Ars Technica found a tweet suggesting that the code was actually written in 2014.

132 comments

  1. Sharing? Or using as an exploit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject.

    1. Re:Sharing? Or using as an exploit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Explaining her actions, the girl said that she'd run into such pranks herself and thought it would be funny if someone clicked the link.

      Should've claimed it was for academic purposes and been given a scholarship, not a prison sentence.

  2. Japanese police, no mention of tentacles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I call boroshilt.

  3. lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    she's gonna kill herself now because she'll be branded as a societal cast-off for the rest of her life and will never get a decent job. excellent work keeping the country safe, guys.

    1. Re:lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're superimposing yourself into the story again, kid.

  4. Wait,what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The popup could be closed in some browsers -- such as Edge and Firefox on desktop -- but couldn't be closed in others, such as Chrome on desktop and the majority of mobile browsers

    Maybe Microsoft should re-think that plan of re-writing Edge to use Chromium instead of their own engine.

    1. Re:Wait,what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also blatantly false.

      Chrome no longer uses modal dialog boxes for alert popups. Instead they're little in-tab things that are tab-modal, so you can close the tab with the popup in it, no problem. Pretty much all mobile browsers these days (with the exception of Mobile Safari and therefore everything on iOS) work the same way: you can't close the popup, but you can close the tab it's in, so it doesn't really matter.

      Also I'm pretty sure every desktop browser (and every mobile browser with, again, the exception of Mobile Safari) offers the option to prevent all further popups after the second one.

    2. Re:Wait,what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not understanding, this code broke the browser pop-up implementation to do what it does. It's not an example of a feature being used properly. Start over.

    3. Re:Wait,what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's a feature, not a bug.
      Limiting what javascript can do might hurt Google's tracking code.

    4. Re:Wait,what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No it didn't. The Ars Technica article includes the code in question, it's just for (;;) { alert("Slashdot hates Unicode"); } with a Japanese message in the alert. It's your standard alert flood that browsers have had mitigations to deal with for years. If you check the Ars comments they confirm that it doesn't break any modern browser, with the exception of (drumroll) Mobile Safari.

      If you want to verify that's all it does, the Ars Technica article provides the Archive.org link to the original website and you can confirm (after ignoring all the JavaScript junk Archive.org adds) that's all there is, it's just an infinite loop that calls alert a bunch. Nothing to break the popup implementation, nothing to try and work around it, just an infinite loop/alert one-liner.

    5. Re:Wait,what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "it's just an infinite loop that calls alert a bunch" AKA breaking the popup implementation controls via script on affected browsers.

    6. Re:Wait,what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This trick actually worked past 2001? @_o

    7. Re:Wait,what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Chrome, apparently it did. And we still use to joke about Microsoft's Internet Explorer.
      Now I feel oddly validated for still using Firefox and NoScript as well as Chrome with ScriptBlock. Websites that want me to turn them off before I can use them can go to hell.

    8. Re: Wait,what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know what other way to say "no it didn't" that would get it through your thick skull, but, no, it didn't.

      You can just close the tab and the popups go away. Chrome handles it fine.

      Firefox, on the other hand, breaks: when you close the tab it keeps running the JavaScript in a worker process that I ended up having to kill -9 to get rid of.

    9. Re: Wait,what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      History is doomed to repeat itself.

    10. Re: Wait,what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know how to point this out, but you're contradicting an article that says the exact opposite, and has publishing credentials you do not as an anonymous coward. We'll go with them until you prove this "fact"

    11. Re: Wait,what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the damned Ars Technica article. You know, the one written by people who know tech and know what they're talking about?

      Every mainstream desktop browser seems to handle the malicious page without incident. Edge, for example, offers a checkbox to prevent the page from being able to show subsequent dialogs, and Chrome lets you close the tab in spite of the alert box.

      I mean, Ars is wrong, in that Firefox breaks, but A) I guess you can't really call Firefox "mainstream" these days and B) it breaks in a subtle way after you close the tab and it looks like it handles it fine because the tab goes away. But ZDnet is written by idiots who do not understand technology. Like Ars says, no mainstream browser has issues with it.

    12. Re:Wait,what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you liek mudkips?

    13. Re:Wait,what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jeez... imagine if you'd been arrested for writing something like 10 PRINT "Teacher smells!"; 20 GOTO 10 on the school computers...

  5. It's not a "crime". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It is a crime. Japan has different laws. Deal with it.

    1. Re:It's not a "crime". by gweihir · · Score: 3, Insightful

      North Korea and historic Nazi Germany also has different laws. Does not mean these laws are sane, moral or acceptable.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    2. Re:It's not a "crime". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't Japan about the only country in the world where computer viruses are legal, but the they'll lock you up for a popup? Strange place.

    3. Re:It's not a "crime". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A crime that you disagree with does not cease to be a crime.

    4. Re:It's not a "crime". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Claiming politicians have "dual loyalty" is the latest Nazi tactic as Democrat Ilhan Omar demonstrated last week, and here you are claiming Trump has dual loyalty...looks like the Nazi is you!

    5. Re:It's not a "crime". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is up to a countries own citizens to either support or oppose the laws of their government. Any outside interference is not to be attempted or subjected to criticism by outsiders as long as countries laws and actions stay within their own borders. In NK anyone disagreeing with the laws they live under are either killed or shuffled off to prison camps where they get to die slowly. The people living in NK after 70 years of oppression and brain washing can't comprehend let alone disagree with the laws they are forced to live under. The German citizens living under Nazi rule faced the same fate. However, there are differences between the two countries. The majority of Germans really didn't have any problems under Nazi rule until they started losing the war and the bombers showed up. Once that happened there wasn't a Nazi to be found only people claiming ignorance of what their government was doing while shuffling around the ruins of their country. Unlike today people back then knew how war is suppose to be waged. Using the very simple strategy of killing all your enemies using any weapons available and dropping bombs until the rubble bounced. The only tricky part back then was trying to preserve someone in the government or military who could sign the unconditional surrender agreement even if that meant rounding up the Imperial Janitor or German lowly Soldat.

    6. Re:It's not a "crime". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump has singular loyalty - to himself. Russia exploited this perfectly with or without his knowledge, but he lied about it many, many provable (already admitted too) times. Sorry, Trump is a tinydick nazi traitor and he'll die in prison.

      The system works. That's why we have laws. If you don't like it you can take a private jet back to Moscow with the first Treason family, but don't come back. We'll lock your entire traitor family up for life, Trumpies. It's happening.

      Mueller is going to be on the job for the next DECADE. ALLLllllllll of the Trump associates are getting investigated for their frauds. It's going to be a very conservative federal penitentiary when he's done filling it.

    7. Re: It's not a "crime". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least Donald Trump didn't order the murder of American citizens via drone strike like your lawless hero Obama.

      Actually he did. He also ordered the Department of Homeland security go steal children and sell them off. And tried to get a battleship named after himself.

    8. Re: It's not a "crime". by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      And tried to get a battleship named after himself.

      Bullshit. No one makes battleships anymore, they're obsolete. A cruiser can easily pack enough punch, including SAMs, anti-ship and cruise missiles. Humongous guns are not a thing anymore. For that you just call the flyboys on the carrier.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    9. Re:It's not a "crime". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may not like them, I make not like them. We may complain about the sanity of those laws. But we have little other choice than accepting that they're doing it this way.

      Well, that is unless you think it would be moral or sane to force our value and law systems onto them.
      And since Godwin's Law was already fulfilled by your contribution, I'd like to remind you of Emanuel Geibel's: "Am deutschen Wesen mag die Welt genesen." A sentiment which Nazi Germany certainly approved of.

    10. Re: It's not a "crime". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WW1 brutality in the trenches was shocking and dishonorable at the time. WW2 civillian genocide and destruction is still shocking today, though some long for older times, so Syria. WW3 wont have people left to be shocked.

    11. Re:It's not a "crime". by HiThere · · Score: 1

      It's their country, so they can have their own laws. I happen to think this particular one, or perhaps just their implementation of it, is brain dead.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    12. Re:It's not a "crime". by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Unlike today people back then knew how war is suppose to be waged. Using the very simple strategy of killing all your enemies using any weapons available and dropping bombs until the rubble bounced.

      Actually civilians usually weren't purposely targeted before WWII. I believe there were even international agreements about it.
      Assuming you're American, laws against attacking civilians go back at least to the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, signed with Mexico in 1848. Remember, treaties are the second highest laws in the land.
      Modern laws of war can be said to start with the Hague conventions, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/....
      It was also as much the Allies who first started targeting civilians in WWII, carpet bombing, incendiary bombing were western inventions.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    13. Re:It's not a "crime". by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Probably more the implementation then the actual law, not that I've read it or anything.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    14. Re:It's not a "crime". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So does the US on any policy related to recreational drug use.

    15. Re:It's not a "crime". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      kill yourself, you authoritarian retard

    16. Re:It's not a "crime". by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Actually civilians usually weren't purposely targeted before WWII.

      You may want to talk to the people of Georgia about General Sherman.

    17. Re:It's not a "crime". by dryeo · · Score: 1

      That only shows that America has a long history of war crimes, in Sherman's case the Lieber Code, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... and he should have been one of the ones (actually two) tried for war crimes. Seems people have been executed for such stuff since at least 1474, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    18. Re:It's not a "crime". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Saudi Arabia sodomy is a legal way for a male (Muslin) to relieve themselves with a (male) child.
      There are documented cases in the U.S. (and notably Europe) where a Muslin immigrant has done
      this and virtually nothing happens, "'cause it's their belief." So to say that Saudi Arabia has different
      laws on homosexuality makes it appear that they're 100% heterosexual and that is complete fantasy.

      It's a shame this girl is being prosecuted for a silly prank. Japanese culture is very severe in some
      regards and this could ruin her future. I can't tell you how many times (way in the past) we played
      xmelt on each other at an olde job. MoF, your screen is probably melting now as you read this :) !

      And for Christ's sake, she's only 13 years old! There has to be something more to this - someone
      in power that she pissed off that is not explained in the article.

      CAP === 'inflict'

    19. Re:It's not a "crime". by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Sherman was on the winning side. Only losers are tried for war crimes.

    20. Re: It's not a "crime". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you going to have a stroke when Trump is re-elected?

      I did not vote for him last time but I will next time now that I understand how super triggered he makes people like you. He is no different at all than any other politician except his term in office, or more specifically your triggered response to his existence, makes me lmao, so I say 4 more years (of hilarity and triggering)!

  6. Firefox allows those more than Chrome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    The main reason I switched to Chrome was that I was sick of those stupid unclosable pop-ups on Firefox.

  7. Pics plz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Script kiddie porn ftw!

  8. Alt Headline by DalM · · Score: 1

    "13 year old girl in Japan discover's simple browser exploit. Authorities react by arresting her."

    1. Re:Alt Headline by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

      As with all stories, the details are a little more nuanced. She acted on her own agency in good faith, but finally submitted to and received the corporal punishment she was due for her actions.

  9. Heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    When I was a kid I had javascript on my homepage that would open your CD drive. I'd probably be looking at 10-20 these days, eh?

    1. Re:Heh. by dissy · · Score: 5, Funny

      When I was a kid I had javascript on my homepage that would open your CD drive. I'd probably be looking at 10-20 these days, eh?

      When I was a kid it was:
      20 GOTO 10

      Can you imagine the conversation in the prison cell?
      "What are you in for?"
      "Javascript popup, you?"
      "A goto command in basic"
      "Goto?! you monster!"

    2. Re: Heh. by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      No you didn't. Maybe vbscript.

    3. Re:Heh. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Oh ... I always thought it was a cup holder?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    4. Re: Heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you're not a coder, shush child.

    5. Re:Heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      \\classmate_computer_network_name\C:\con\con

    6. Re:Heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking along these lines. I remember having a convoluted home program for "security" on my disk drive. Or like turning down the monitor brightness in the computer lab.

    7. Re: Heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Post source code to JavaScript that could, at any point in time, have opened the CD drive on any computer in any browser. I’m honestly interested to see such code because I believe it does not exist.

      Bonus points for giving steps-to-reproduce including OS, browser, and versions of everything to allow reproduction of this alleged hack.

    8. Re:Heh. by dryeo · · Score: 2

      " Mother rapers. Father stabbers. Father rapers! Father rapers sitting right there on the bench next to me! And they was mean and nasty and ugly and horrible crime-type guys sitting on the bench next to me. And the meanest, ugliest, nastiest one, the meanest father raper of them all, was coming over to me and he was mean and ugly and nasty and horrible and all kind of things and he sat down next to me and said, "Kid, what did you do"? I answered "a goto command in basic" and they all moved away from me "

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    9. Re: Heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite simple, you'd try to access a (non-existing) file on the drive. Or iterate all possible drive letters on this MS-based OS.

      Similar to how browsers still manage to spin up an idling disk-drive while they have zero business accessing such location these days, just no-one bothers to file or fix a bug report.

    10. Re: Heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I try to access an empty CD drive or access a file that doesn't exist, I simply get an error message telling me so. The drive does not eject, that would be stupid. Either your too young to have used actual CD drives or your memory is failing you.

    11. Re:Heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10 CLS

    12. Re:Heh. by grep+-v+'.*'+* · · Score: 1

      Can you imagine the conversation in the prison cell?
      "What are you in for?"
      "Javascript popup, you?"
      "A goto command in basic"
      "Goto?! you monster!"

      And they all moved away from me on the bench there, with the hairy eyeball,
      And all kinds of mean, nasty things, till I said, "And creatin' a nuisance",
      And they all came back, shook my hand, and we had a great time on the bench talking about crime, ...

      --
      If the universe is someone's simulation -- does that mean the stars are just stuck pixels?
    13. Re:Heh. by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      20 GOTO 10

      Can you imagine the conversation in the prison cell?
      "What are you in for?"
      "Javascript popup, you?"
      "A goto command in basic"
      "Goto?! you monster!"

      You think *you* had it bad. I was an ALTER boy!

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    14. Re:Heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      die() !

    15. Re:Heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was a kid I had javascript on my homepage that would open your CD drive. I'd probably be looking at 10-20 these days, eh?

      When I was a kid it was:
      20 GOTO 10

      Can you imagine the conversation in the prison cell?
      "What are you in for?"
      "Javascript popup, you?"
      "A goto command in basic"
      "Goto?! you monster!"

      And now, in prison, you get to have fun with POKE.

    16. Re:Heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amateurs!

      10 PRINT "TOM IS GREAT!!!"
      20 GOTO 10

      ** quickly entered into the TRS-80 at your local Radio Shack while the clerk was helping someone actually buy discrete electronic parts and your mom waited in line to buy batteries. **

    17. Re: Heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sad moment when you realize that goto in the original basic was just flow control. Similar to functions in C. Now if you use goto in c or c++ (yes it exists) you deserve the raptor. https://xkcd.com/292/

    18. Re: Heh. by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      JavaScript has never had the ability to access local files when running in a browser. If it did that would be a massive security issue. You've just further demonstrated that you're full of shit.

    19. Re: Heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The open your disk drive exploit was prominently featured on the digicrime joke website.
      To give you an idea, the website was full of cute browser pranks and most of them would work for an eternity compared to how long similar things would work today.

      They also had one that would print to your printer and I adopted it to make modems hang up. lolol good times.

    20. Re:Heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shhhh! You can't tell an old internet folk tale without creimer appearing to tell you how people at his gov TLA job still think it's a cup holder!

    21. Re:Heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently they never heard of, slightly modify as to not be copy-pastable, func_name(){func_namefunc_name};func_name; for Bourne compatible shells, known as a fork bomb. In comparison the endless popup is hardly anything I would call a crime, more like an annoyance. I do not see a point of criminal charges unless there is a specific law against such pranks (I am only vaguely familiar with Japanese law). That said, victims of the prank might have civil options particular if losses were incurred due to another browser window being opened.

  10. We find a girl who can code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And this is the reward?

    1. Re: We find a girl who can code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTFS: she didn't write it, she only shared the link. Maybe she can code, but nothing in this story suggests that.

  11. 'Unclosable Popup' For Android, hold menu key by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1.- Hold menu key.
    2.- Find browser window in carrousel if not the first item.
    3.- Press X to close.
    4.- Done.

  12. Trump dying in prison is why we have laws. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obama will be golfing literally the day Trump dies in prison. I bet he gets a better handicap than Diaper-baby Drupf too. Obama = Patriot, Trump = traitor dying in prison. The system works.

    Faggot Trump dies a traitor, and Obama golfs laughing. Lol. "Why did that idiot think Vladimir Putin was his friend? Oh well, lock 'er up." - Obama, smirking.

  13. Matter of perspective. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They might be insane and immoral...to you. To them it it is quite sane and moral. Sanity and morality is what the group decides. The fact that it is not the same as yours means that is YOUR problem. You don't like it? Don't go there. That group has decided to make their own rules as to what is what. For you to attempt to impose your own beliefs is the height of entitlement.

    1. Re: Matter of perspective. by c6gunner · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ah, good old moral relativism! Who are we to tell Nazis that it's wrong to kill all their Jewish citizens? That's the height of entitlement! They're allowed to have their own rules!

    2. Re: Matter of perspective. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " Who are we to tell Nazis that it's wrong to kill all their Jewish citizens? " - The same people who support the Saudis or XYZ's doing it, because oil? You're the moral relativist, he actually had a point of perspective there.

      From the legal standpoint and the societal norms of the time, what happened was not considered immoral or evil. Most people in fact did not realize the immorality until much later, which factored in why it happened on such scale.

      Besides, you literally support a nazi right now, for politics. So your moral relativism is QUITE clear, in fact.

    3. Re: Matter of perspective. by dryeo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, we didn't declare war on them until they invaded Poland and America waited until Germany declared war on them.
      As for the Jews, first they tried to get rid of them. When no one would take them, they tried to create a homeland in Madagascar for them. When that failed, they came up with the final solution.
      If the rest of the world cared, they could have let those refugee ships full of Jews land.
      After the war, the Jews did get a big PR campaign going to lay down the guilt. Notice how little the Nazi's genocide of the Roma is talked about.
      Most of the genocides that have happened since WWII also haven't resulted in military intervention.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    4. Re: Matter of perspective. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Political relativism U-betcha no moral issue involved except rulers power. Jews lovelovelub that power !!! Yep ... the original sin of JEWS and justification for anti-semitism is to place law over culture. All Semites do it since Hammurabi .... including Jews. Damnable. Every lawgiver becomes a tyrant and Trotsky-slut bitchboi. OTOH if you live in cannibal country, better grab yo neck ... you have no bitch. If you don't like it don't live there.

    5. Re: Matter of perspective. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moral disagreements founded on assertion of good and bad prove the existence of moral relativism. We believe it was wrong for the Nazis to kill their Jewish citizens. That does not mean there are laws of moral correctness we are all bound by as if they hold the same necessity as physical laws.

      Some believe arranged marriage is moral. Some don't. Some believe abortion is not murder. Some do. The deciding factor of these beliefs is in the framework which founded them and none can be refuted from outside.

      Moral relativism isn't so cut and dried.

    6. Re:Matter of perspective. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Sanity and morality is what the group decides.

      Ethics are decided by the group. Morality is up to the individual.

      You don't like it? Don't go there.

      She was born there. So she didn't have a choice.

      Freedom of expression is a universal right. We should speak out if it is denied anywhere.

    7. Re: Matter of perspective. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Judea declared War on Germany in 1933, attempting to use international influence to starve Germany to death.

      You can believe whatever rewritten bullshit history they taught you about in government created school curriculum, but the truth is that Victors write the History, and justify their own heinous actions with propaganda against the enemy. All historians know this, but somehow when you say this applies to WWII too, everyone looses their fucking minds.

    8. Re: Matter of perspective. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see you know nothing of the Balfour Declaration, nor the Hooton Plan.

      Carry on, pleb.

    9. Re: Matter of perspective. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The nation state of Judea declared war on Germany? Where exactly was Judea? Please enlighten us, my new-Nazi friend.

      This is new. The first time I have seen a neo-Nazi try to justify the holocaust with a Judean declaration of war.

    10. Re: Matter of perspective. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same news paper screenshot isn't proof of anything. It's like a one man spam on twitch chat.

    11. Re: Matter of perspective. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      The "Madagascar Plan" was never a realistic plan to move Jews to a safe place. The plan was to turn Madagascar into a police state run by the SS that would accept 4 million Jews over 4 years.

      The Polish government determined that Madagascar could only support 5,000 to 7,000 families.

      Without the resources to support so many people the vast majority would die due to the harsh conditions.

      The Nazis were basically trying to turn Madagascar into a giant concentration camp.

  14. The real crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    JavaScript is the real crime here, and it is against all of humanity. It's always been the programming language of choice for dastardly ne're-do-wells and lawless hooligans. It's high time we seriously regard writing even one JavaScript statement as felonious anti-social behavior and bring that Brendan Eich guy up on charges!

    1. Re: The real crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Itâ(TM)s so bad the even brought it server-side with NodeJs to make sure everyone gets a share of the badness

  15. Shame: Japanese Police Act like Chinese Police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Japanese police exhibit some resemblance to the Chinese police.

    Chinese morality rapes Western notions of human decency.

    Get more info about this issue.

  16. Is there a legitimate use for such things by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    So some language feature is being misused by the some app. But the OS should have some sort of intervention to cut in and terminate the errant application. So why is that not possible?

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re: Is there a legitimate use for such things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Braindead browser code allowing pop anything in the first place. Bad code, design, just godawful and silly.

  17. For a loop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does 10 print "hello, world!" ... 20 goto 10 get life in prison?

    1. Re:For a loop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not life, just 10 to 20

    2. Re:For a loop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol! Good thing nobody ever does these with higher line numbers.

  18. Re:'Unclosable Popup' For Android, hold menu key by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone knows that you have to SWIPE in Android 9 Pie, because they removed the X button. Your exploit is out of date.

  19. Uh oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Better strap her in a chair and a Hannibal Lecter mask, and stick her in a prison cell 2 miles under the sea! Knowledge is dangerous.

    Badknow gets you punished!

  20. OMFG she's a time traveller from 1996 by future+assassin · · Score: 1

    hail the JS trickster from 1996.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    1. Re:OMFG she's a time traveller from 1996 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is 1996 in Japan.

  21. Glad I grew up 30-40 years ago by Snotnose · · Score: 4, Funny

    Back then the fun hack was to edit someone's .login file so the first line was logout. Back in the days of VT-100 tubes connected to VAXen running Unix.

    Half the shit we did back then would get us tossed in jail for 10+ years now.

    1. Re:Glad I grew up 30-40 years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got in trouble for a one line file called baseball.bat

      @command /k baseball

      It would crash machines running Windows 3.11.

    2. Re:Glad I grew up 30-40 years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dad? Did you hit the liquor again? Every time you talk about VT100's I start to get worried.

    3. Re:Glad I grew up 30-40 years ago by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      One thing is the group is 100 people strong. Another thing is when it is 100 million strong.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  22. Re:Juvenile criminal records by Luckyo · · Score: 2

    No shortage of murdering kids in the country where there's a massive shortage of murders in general? Have you seen then murder numbers?

    Citation or crawl back under your bridge on the "lack of shortage of child murderers in Japan".

  23. Shots fired by jargonburn · · Score: 1

    Google and other search engines should pay attention to this. Obviously, linking criminal math is a crime!

  24. Re: Juvenile criminal records by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are countless animated documentaries in the subject.

    Never relax around Japanese kids, especially if they're in robots.

  25. Re: Juvenile criminal records by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Japanese schoolgirl is the most dangerous creature on the planet Earth.

  26. Re: Juvenile criminal records by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah there was one wielding a flaming sword on TV the other day!

  27. WTF Murica?? Not mainstream? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Firefox is THE browser. Only morons have Data Kraken Google's Chrome here in Germany/BeNeLux.

    You Americans broke the web back then, by clinging to IE. Now you break it again, by clinging to Chrome.

    Sorry, that makes you morons.
    No surprise there, I guess.

  28. They went away years ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I call bullshit, since they have been gone forever.

  29. Re:Juvenile criminal records by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 0

    Citation or crawl back under your bridge on the "lack of shortage of child murderers in Japan".

    Citation: Murder of Junko Furuta

    She was a 17 year old high school student. She was kidnapped, and horrifically tortured and gang raped for weeks. She begged her tormentors to kill her, as they became more and more sadistic. They eventually murdered her and threw her body in a dumpster.

    The perpetrators walk free today. Some of them served as little as 3 years in prison.

  30. Re:Juvenile criminal records by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    one example is not a citation backing up 'no shortage of murdering kids'

  31. Unclosable? Innovative? by CustomSolvers2 · · Score: 1

    I have been seeing annoying (theoretically-)impossible-to-close, uncaught-by-blockers pop-ups for years when accessing certain (cough) sites. The "fix" is easy: kill the browser and/or the given popups. On Windows, some browsers even allow you to close unclosable-otherwise windows by right clicking on the task-bar icon and selecting the window you want (I guess that this has its own thread, unlikely the top closing button on the popup windows). To not mention the tiny issue that this is about JavaScript and well... you could just disable it!

    Firstly, creating infinite loops is one of the simplest actions you can perform in programming; actually, it is usually an error or the result of a bad approach in general or in that case. Freezing an application with an infinite loop is one of the most trivial things anyone can do (why publicly releasing a very simple piece of code is relevant at all?!). On the other hand, if an infinite loop can freeze a given GUI, it would mean that the creators of that piece of software haven't done a particularly good multi-threading work (and I am say that despite not being precisely a GUI expert myself). Secondly and as explained above, there is nothing innovative about this thing. And thirdly and more importantly, presenting charges against anyone of any age and with any intention for something so ridiculously inoffensive says a lot (about the ignorance) of the given administration/administrator.

    I guess that the we are now in a world where just a word ("exploit") and a baseless-assumption (e.g., young people know how to do stuff with computers) is enough to invent a non-existing something. On the bright side, this seems a win-win situation. The administrator/administration (unmotivatedly) gets an image of zero-tolerance with cyber-criminals. The girl gets her 15 minutes of fame, likely to be very positive, mainly lately and by bearing in mind that we are talking about a young female in a men-dominated field who is (slightly-) against the system.

    --
    Custom Solvers 2.0 = Alvaro Carballo Garcia = varocarbas.
    1. Re:Unclosable? Innovative? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do some gamedev in HTML5. There is not a single week that goes by wherein I don't accidentally discover yet another way to lock up a web browser using perfectly valid Javascript / ASM.js and/or WebAssembly.

    2. Re:Unclosable? Innovative? by CustomSolvers2 · · Score: 1

      not a single week that goes by wherein I don't accidentally discover yet another way to lock up a web browser

      Even if you did it intentionally, making a given piece of software or part of it irresponsive isn't malicious in most of scenarios. It might be the consequence of a bad implementation or even an implicit security measure (e.g., in case of doubt, get blocked).

      --
      Custom Solvers 2.0 = Alvaro Carballo Garcia = varocarbas.
  32. Crappy by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    In other news Japanese police arrest man for wearing a bow tie.

  33. Chrome tab can be closed, JS Alert not modal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    while (1) {alert("!");} can be closed via the browser tab in chrome no problem.

  34. Re: Shame: Japanese Police Act like Chinese Polic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lol @ "Western notions of decency". Igorance is bliss in your case, I presume.

  35. Nothing fancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for ( ; ; ) {
          window.alert("whatever you want to say here")
    }

  36. great, just what we needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the americans spying on everyone, the russians fucking shit up blyat style, the chinese stealing trade secrets, the islamic state putting up retarded websites with weird ass font sizes, and not we have attack code lolis who can crash your microsoft exploiter

    you now what, that extra dimension makes everything more dangerous, im telling you, im sticking to my 2 dimensional lolis, less danger there

  37. Re:Juvenile criminal records by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, one case which happened almost 30 years ago. Sure sounds like Japan can't deal with all the murderous kids there.

  38. Re:Juvenile criminal records by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some of them served as little as 3 years in prison.

    Why would you post a lie under a link proving yourself wrong?

  39. Imagine doing this with political blackmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Currently the gate-keeping establishment has a stranglehold on information outlets. If you have a bunch of evidence that powerful political elites are rapists, murderers and/or paedophiles you can't go to the newspapers or television news outlets, they're in with the govs so it will not see the light of day, and the Wikileaks pidgeonhole will censor it.

    However, if you write a small virus to propagate your information to the masses then you can bypass all forms of censorship....

    Now, the fucked up thing is that people like me actually know how shit really works in this realm and know that human trafficking isn't that big of a deal compared to the greater things going on here. However, if people like me who have demonstrated the capability to do the shit I'm talking about get pissed on by the bullshit governments that we allow to live, then we can just destroy the entire fucking system pretty simply now thanks to all the insecure screens that they've got idiots staring at... Understand?

  40. whales and dolophins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's all whales and dolphins fault! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E39WWj_RpBc

  41. Re: Juvenile criminal records by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You would hopefully feel differently if that was your daughter.

    However:
    1) you are a virgin
    2) you are a sociopath
    3) you will remain a virgin

  42. There's no shortage of kids who actually murder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Due to low demand?

  43. Re:There are more than two arthropods by dkman · · Score: 1

    I have no intention to read the article (just being honest), but it seems dumb to punish a person for pointing people there and doing nothing about the sites hosting the content.If the page wan't there people would just get a 404 error, not an unclosable popup. And can't those affected just close the app?

    --
    I refuse to sign
  44. wow by sad_ · · Score: 1

    if that stuff already is cause for police questioning, what the hell...

    this is a prank, you know, like the one where you say 'press alt-f4 for admin rights' in a chat channel, no harm was done, chill out.

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  45. Re:Juvenile criminal records by Luckyo · · Score: 1

    You provided excellent evidence for my point. Not only did you show no evidence for high number of child murderers, but you had to dig thirty years back into the past just to find a single murder case.

  46. Re: Juvenile criminal records by Luckyo · · Score: 1

    The difference between modern civil societies and barbarism is that even in event that this was your daughter, if you're a decent human being, you will be able to say something among the lines of:

    "This was an abhorrent crime, but we have a justice system and I'll let that manage the response".

    Not that I'd expect a sociopath such as yourself to understand.

  47. Maybe he's WindBourne? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He does it all the time.