Slashdot Mirror


DST-Hating Reps in Washington State Vote To 'Ditch the Switch' (komonews.com)

In the state of Washington, the House has voted 89 to 7 to "ditch the switch, bring the light, and defeat the dark night," says one representative. KOMO reports: Changing the clocks twice a year impacts the body's natural rhythms and is associated with a spike in heart attacks, strokes, and traffic collisions each year, according to the Washington State Department of Health's impact review. Extended daylight in the evening is also better for kids who play sports or who are active outside, Riccelli said. The bill now heads to the Senate for consideration.... The federal government would have the final say.
And meanwhile, one Pennsylvania newspaper has published a state representative's op-ed calling for Pennsylvania to help lead the resistance in America's Eastern Standard Time zone, complaining that "This weekend, we again will be forced to comply with an archaic tradition, one that offers no benefits." There is no national crisis that changing clocks helps to alleviate. In fact, there are more negative side effects from changing clocks than benefits. Studies have shown that automobile accidents, workplace injuries, heart attacks, strokes, cluster headaches, miscarriages, depression, and suicides all increase in the weeks following clock changes.

This government-mandated interruption of natural biological rhythms and sleep cycles can wreak havoc on job performance, academic results, and overall physical/mental health. Clock changes require farmers to make needless adjustments, as crops and animals live by the sunlight... During this legislative session, I will be working to advance this commonsense legislation that will not only end the antiquated ritual of changing clocks, but will also help preserve the health, safety, well-being, productivity, and lives of Pennsylvanians.

282 comments

  1. Count me in by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If this ever comes up for a vote I'll be first in line to abolish DST and the pointless back-and-forth with the clocks.

    It's stupid and serves no purpose except to fuck up everyone's schedule twice a year.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    1. Re:Count me in by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I should add that no one, literally NO ONE I know wants to continue with the DST bullshit. No one has ever wanted it as far back as I can recall. I honestly can't think of a single person in my entire life that thought it was a good thing.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    2. Re:Count me in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seconded. I live in Wa state. I've been dreaming of the day we can get rid of this horrible idea that fucks with me every year for months. Will vote. Give me something to write on.

    3. Re:Count me in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can we at least vote to not have DST and stay on Standard time?!
      -Arizonan that doesn't want to permanently be on California time.

    4. Re:Count me in by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0

      I should add that no one, literally NO ONE I know wants to continue with the DST bullshit. No one has ever wanted it as far back as I can recall. I honestly can't think of a single person in my entire life that thought it was a good thing.

      We've been changing the clocks since 1918. That means we've been doing this for over a century. Quit your bitching and just change your fucking clock. It won't kill you. All the sturm and drang about circadian rhythms and how badly it messes you up is overdone. Your daddy did it and your granddaddy did it and your great-granddaddy did it and by god it's good enough for you too.

      Plus, tomorrow night at 6:30pm I'll still be able to sit on my front porch and read. In June, when I walk the dog at 8:30pm, there will still be light in the sky and I like that. I get up at 5:30am anyway, so it's always dark when I wake up, so nothing changes at that end.

      Time is just a social construct. Get with the program and fall back or spring forward or whatever the fuck you're supposed to do tonight. Me, I don't know because I don't wear a wristwatch, so I don't have to change anything. Plus, I've long forgotten how to change the time on my car radio, so at least for the next half a year it will be correct instead of an hour fast.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    5. Re:Count me in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is the solution:

      "Real men don't do DST"

    6. Re:Count me in by mentil · · Score: 2

      It's a conspiracy by Big Candle to sell more light-production products.
      Damn you, Yankee Candle!

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    7. Re:Count me in by mentil · · Score: 1

      You WOULD be first in line, if you didn't forget to change your clocks.

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    8. Re:Count me in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Real men set their clocks to local noon. Train schedules be damned.

    9. Re:Count me in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://www.inc.com/jessica-stillman/experts-to-public-daylight-savings-time-is-a-434m-problem-we-could-easily-fix.html

    10. Re:Count me in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Real men let daylight fend for itself. The nanny-state keeps daylight down by protecting it; making it weak and incapable of protecting itself.

    11. Re:Count me in by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

      So, you don't travel, do you?

    12. Re:Count me in by Z80a · · Score: 2

      The best argument for DST got killed by better lamps.

    13. Re:Count me in by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Without DST we're going to emit more carbon for heating and lighting. Go ahead, kill the planet so you can be a grouchy old man. It gets light at 430 or earlier in the morning, light that is just wasted. It made sense when we were tied to the sun, but now it's dumb. Also enjoy it getting dark way too early. I lived in a country with no DST and it's a waste.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    14. Re:Count me in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Count me as someone who thinks DST is a great thing.

      Find something more useful to society to get passionate about.

      Posting a/c because y'all nuts around this subject. It's almost as much as a shooting fish in a barrel emotional troll subject as metric versus imperial.

    15. Re:Count me in by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      I should add that no one, literally NO ONE I know wants to continue with the DST bullshit

      When most people think about DST, they only think about the disadvantages of the transition, but they don't consider the advantages. Ask them again when it's abolished.

    16. Re:Count me in by bobby · · Score: 1

      If you want to keep changing your clocks, go right ahead. The rest of us will stop the nonsense.

    17. Re:Count me in by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      The BBQ lobby can cite lots of reasons, like more daylight evening hours for outdoor BBQ.

      That's who asked Congress to extend it, when they extended it.

    18. Re:Count me in by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I should add that no one, literally NO ONE I know wants to continue with the DST bullshit.

      So what you're saying is you literally don't know people representative across the population.

    19. Re:Count me in by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      The best argument for DST got killed by better lamps.

      It was also killed by the wide adoption of air conditioning. The power saved by people using less light in the evening is swamped by the power used to run air conditioners for an extra hour in the afternoon, since people come home from work an hour earlier in the summer.

    20. Re:Count me in by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Careful - the last thing you want to do is attract Big Candle's attention...

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    21. Re:Count me in by mentil · · Score: 1

      Indeed, they might try to snuff me out.

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    22. Re:Count me in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "automobile accidents, workplace injuries, heart attacks, strokes, cluster headaches, miscarriages, depression, and suicides all increase in the weeks following clock changes" -- and that is just for the IT staff, imagine the effect on the users...

    23. Re:Count me in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quit your bitching and just change your fucking clock. It won't kill you.

      Actually, the numbers are in and shows that it actually will kill us.

      So quit your bitching and deal with it.

    24. Re:Count me in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No we won't.

      DST doesn't magically give us more daylight, it just moves around what part of day is brighter.

      I would also love to hear how you think it impacts heating.

    25. Re:Count me in by theCoder · · Score: 2

      DST may have been an energy saver back when most people primarily used electricity for lighting. Now, not so much. Especially in warmer climates closer to the equator (where DST does very little anyway), DST tends to cause more energy usage in the form of residential air conditioners. Also, all those people doing things in those "longer" evenings are probably causing more energy use. In more northern areas, getting up earlier when it is still dark and cold uses more lighting and heating energy. See Wikipedia for details. It's more complicated than what I wrote, but DST generally isn't much of a net win for the environment (nor is it really much of a net loss, either).

      Frankly, if you setup your sleep schedule such that midnight is close to the middle of your sleep cycle, you won't have problems with it getting "dark way too early". Yes, this DOES mean waking up before 7am.

      In reality, DST is a social solution, not a technological one. It's really hard to convince some people to wake up earlier like I just suggested. Kind of like it is hard to convince people to exercise and eat right. DST is simply a way to trick people who want to wake up at 7am to actually get up at 6. It's also why the switch is necessary to make it work. If we stayed on DST all year, then those "night owls" would just start sleeping later. Schools and businesses would start at 9 instead of 8, and people would start complaining that it was getting dark out too "early" because the sun is setting at 10pm and they don't want to go to sleep until 1am. And then we'll need double DST for part of the year.

      Sometimes, it is amazing to me that it is easier to convince everyone to change their clocks to the wrong time instead of changing their schedules. I guess it's like programming -- change the underlying code (the time) rather than every place that uses it (the schedules). But still...

      --
      "Save the whales, feed the hungry, free the mallocs" -- author unknown
    26. Re:Count me in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't recognised the time switch for years and just stay on summer time. I don't give a shit what anyone says, I don't live my life according to their selfish, self-appointed rules.

    27. Re:Count me in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can assure you that literally a few people do.

    28. Re:Count me in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Slashdot editors are also in favor of maintaining the switch because the DST topic reliably generates hundreds of comments each time it is brought up.

    29. Re:Count me in by Megane · · Score: 1

      DST was never intended to "save power", unless you're saying that you're as dumb as Dubya, who fell for that argument when he signed the bill that changed the dates back in 2007 or so. It saves "daylight", that's what it says on. People with central air conditioning and 95F+ summers don't turn it off when they're away during the day anyhow, and need it on at night too.

      A couple of years of either the summer sun waking you up two hours before you have to leave for work, or having to commute in the dark in winter (depending on which setting it gets left at), should have you crying to get it back, especially if you're in a northern latitude, where the swing of sunrise time is much wider. DST evens out the mornings between summer and winter, bringing the day closer to what it would be if you started at sunrise all the time. Fixing it to an arbitrary clock (even solar noon) instead of sunrise is the problem, whether or not you use DST.

      I happen to like the sun staying out until 9PM during the summer, while having an actual morning in the winter. I'm also an early riser, so the spring switch works well for me. I was sleepy almost an hour before my usual bedtime last night, so I just rolled with it. It's the waking up an hour later in the fall that I usually have problems with for a few days. I think most people are the other way around.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    30. Re: Count me in by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      I want DST all year.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    31. Re:Count me in by Megane · · Score: 1

      >It saves "daylight", that's what it says on the tin.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    32. Re:Count me in by Megane · · Score: 1

      I thought it was the Big Candy that pushed for the dates to change. Apparently in significant parts of the US, Halloween is done before sunset, and this pushed the clock change date into November. However, in Texas we've traditionally done our trick-or-treating after sunset, so that basically killed it here.

      Meanwhile, what's left of the drive-in movie lobby is down at the bar, crying in their beer. All they need to push them over the edge is for DST to stop in favor of summer time all year around.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    33. Re:Count me in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people need to die anyways, its called natural selection. If we have to keep the warning labels we can keep this too.
      #RemovveAllWarningLabels!

    34. Re:Count me in by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      If this ever comes up for a vote I'll be first in line to abolish DST and the pointless back-and-forth with the clocks.

      It's stupid and serves no purpose except to fuck up everyone's schedule twice a year.

      Next, we need to stop the bullshit of it getting light and dark at different times. It needs to get light at 7 in the morning, and dark at 8 in the evening, all year round, everywhere.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    35. Re:Count me in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I honestly can't think of a single person in my entire life that thought it was a good thing.

      And yet, twice a year every year, every newspaper and media outlet happily proclaimed the oncoming virtues, benefits, and rationale for the time change. Every year, twice a year. As long as I've been alive.

      Are they all just going to stop doing that now?

    36. Re:Count me in by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      DST was never intended to "save power",
      In Europe it was. The idea was people switch on the lights later. Especially shopping malls etc. However no one bothered to change the programming of shopping window lights.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    37. Re:Count me in by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      DST may have been an energy saver back when most people primarily used electricity for lighting.

      Some of us still use electricity for lighting. What do you use, whale oil lamps, or maybe Camphine?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    38. Re:Count me in by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      So, you don't travel, do you?

      Not certain what angle you are working Bruce, since no quote. But I've travelled a lot over the years, and have to chuckle at the folks for whom the twice a year shift is an insufferable assault. Typically across 3-4 time zones. The past 5 years or so, it's been across one time zone, but hey - the day/night cycles are all different.

      You simply adapt. Or if I was just on a short duration, I kept my own time zone schedule as much as possible. Just tell me when its time for breakfast, and I'll get by.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    39. Re:Count me in by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you should simply get used to it that there are "early birds" and "night owls".
      No idea why people always want to press "their schedule" on other people who have a different "bio rhythm".

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    40. Re:Count me in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean 3rd world savages have no use for DST. Agreed. Next ....

    41. Re:Count me in by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      And you can't see the sun in the state of Washington anyway.

    42. Re: Count me in by Mspangler · · Score: 1

      "People with central air conditioning and 95F+ summers don't turn it off when they're away during the day anyhow, and need it on at night too."

      False. My AC comes on when I get home, and goes off at sunset. The I open the windows and start a fan. By morning it's 50 F outside, and can button up the house and head to work.

      If I'm home for the day, and it's 90 F by 9 AM then it will be warm enough inside to need the AC by around 2 PM.

    43. Re:Count me in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I should add that no one, literally NO ONE I know wants to continue with the DST bullshit.

      Well, you don't know me, but let me tell you I don't care.

      I have stopped using an alarm clock in 2012 and DST does not affect me in any way. That day I go to bed whenever I want, the next morning I wake up whenever I feel like it. DST may shift my schedule a bit, but by the second or third day I'm back to work around 8 am as usual.

    44. Re: Count me in by Mspangler · · Score: 1

      You can on the East side, except in December when the freezing sets it.

    45. Re:Count me in by raftpeople · · Score: 1

      For me and apparently many in Wa state, the best part of DST is sunlight in the evening, after work etc. Lamps are unrelated to that argument.

    46. Re:Count me in by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Your daddy did it and your granddaddy did it and your great-granddaddy did it and by god it's good enough for you too

      Yeah! And not only that, but we should be allowed to die of polio and measles and other preventable diseases, just like my granddaddy and great-granddaddy did too! That'll teach 'em!

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    47. Re:Count me in by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is you literally don't know people representative across the population.

      Yes, I am saying that I don't know either of those people.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    48. Re:Count me in by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      So, you don't travel, do you?

      Not these days so much, but I used to travel a lot and it didn't make any sense then either.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    49. Re: Count me in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DST was invented before the rise of the 24 hour economy. Most energy usage was when people were at work, so by aligning work hours with natural light you could cut down on usage.
      That's not true anymore. People use a LOT more energy at home, air conditioning is far more prevalent, and almost nobody uses wood or coal for heat or light anymore. DST might have made sense, even as recently as the early 80s, but from the 90s onward it is increasingly irrelevant.
      All the arguments about how much light there is outside after work are bullshit that was only recently made up as an excuse to keep it around. Ya, it's bright when your kids leave school... and dark when they go. And most of DST they're not even IN school.

    50. Re: Count me in by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      DST was invented before the rise of the 24 hour economy. Most energy usage was when people were at work, so by aligning work hours with natural light you could cut down on usage. That's not true anymore. People use a LOT more energy at home, air conditioning is far more prevalent, and almost nobody uses wood or coal for heat or light anymore. .

      Well hell, looks like we can save a LOT of money just by keeping people at work, amirite?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    51. Re:Count me in by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Sometimes, it is amazing to me that it is easier to convince everyone to change their clocks to the wrong time instead of changing their schedules. I guess it's like programming -- change the underlying code (the time) rather than every place that uses it (the schedules). But still...

      I forgot to add about that comment - what exactly is the right time? I think maybe in the interest of personal freedom, everyone gets to choose their own time, since there is no right time, it's all relative.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    52. Re:Count me in by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      So Jimmy Carter lied to us or something I can't even rmemsr anymore

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    53. Re: Count me in by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      That's nice if you live in the south with an industrial ac and more insulation than a hippo, but if it's 90 at 9 AM here then my AC has struggled to keep it at 72 all night long.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    54. Re:Count me in by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The word either doesn't apply to >7, a fact you could get from the summary. When trolling it pays not to appear to be really stupid.

    55. Re:Count me in by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      You use electricity for lighting but the electric use for that is 1/3 what it was thanks to LED lights.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    56. Re:Count me in by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      No idea why people always want to press "their schedule" on other people who have a different "bio rhythm".

      Some people can't get to bed (much less to sleep) before midnight or 1 AM. Thanks to technological advancements, it can take hours every day to process the new day's porn.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    57. Re:Count me in by theCoder · · Score: 1

      If we're going to have time zones at all, then the right time tries to align noon with the sun's zenith. A balance of sunrise and sunset at equal distances from noon (or midnight). At least as best as possible, since there are variations throughout the year, as well as each location within the time zone. Daylight saving time aligns that high point of the sun with 1pm instead of noon.

      Some countries are worse than others in this:

      World_Time_Zones_Map.png
      DST_Countries_Map.png

      Argentina is in UTC-3, even though it is entirely within the UTC-4 and UTC-5 regions (parts of it are the same longitude as New York City). Spain is in UTC+1 despite being directly south of the U.K. (UTC+0). And Spain then celebrates DST, making the sun's high point at 2pm or later. There are lots of other examples, though many of them occur at extreme latitudes where time zones have less meaning (and there are less people around to be affected).

      What's interesting about the time zone map is how many time zones drift west of their natural boundaries. Almost none drift to the east. This already pushes for later sunrises and sunsets. It's clearly a strong human societal force, pushing for unbalanced time reckoning. There may be advantages to it, but they are psychological, existing in how people work. The same could be said for the concept of time zones itself.

      I'm not really arguing against time zones or DST. Just hoping people would realize that DST is just about tricking people into getting up earlier. Though if enough people realized that, it probably would stop working :)

      --
      "Save the whales, feed the hungry, free the mallocs" -- author unknown
    58. Re:Count me in by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      If we're going to have time zones at all, then the right time tries to align noon with the sun's zenith. A balance of sunrise and sunset at equal distances from noon (or midnight). At least as best as possible, since there are variations throughout the year, as well as each location within the time zone. \

      A lot of solutions like that end up with thousands of time zones, depending on the granularity desired.

      I went over this the last DST is cancer article in here. With living on a spheroid, with the world now being bigger than where we can ride a horse in a day, there simply is no system that works well. Tying the time to the local conditions doesn't help people around the world with all their local condition.

      So - let's say that Slashdot users have their way, and we have only one time zone - Something similar to coordinated universal time. The alternitive being hundreds ot thousands of local times tied to the local dark/light cycle.

      Who gets to force the rest of the world to obey the one true time zone. As gone over before, some people will be getting up, going to work, and having the day change partway through their work day. Or else work to local daylight time, which makes for a hellava mess.

      It's almost like those who came before us weren't actually stupid.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    59. Re: Count me in by Mspangler · · Score: 1

      I should have specified more. I'm in eastern Washington state. House was built in 1957, so 3" insulation in the walls but the attic was upgraded to 12". Windows are double pane, but not low-e. The secret is lathe and plaster walls. Huge heat capacity compared to drywall. Store heat during the day, blow it out into the semi-desert air all night.

    60. Re:Count me in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This doesn't abolish DST. It just extends it to all year.

      Wish they'd just repeal all the previous DST laws and adopt PST/MST/CST/EST all year. If you want to wake up one hour early, then you don't need a law from congress to do it. If you want to eat one hour later than everyone else, just do it.

    61. Re:Count me in by aybiss · · Score: 1

      That's because you're a stupid person who doesn't know what DST is for.

      I like DST and will fight to keep it. Now you know at least one person who thinks it's a good thing.

      See? Progress!

      --
      It's OK Bender, there's no such thing as 2.
    62. Re:Count me in by aybiss · · Score: 1

      "It was also killed by the wide adoption of air conditioning."

      Oh really? That sounds like something someone who works inside would say.

      --
      It's OK Bender, there's no such thing as 2.
    63. Re:Count me in by Aqualung812 · · Score: 1

      We've been changing the clocks since 1918. That means we've been doing this for over a century.

      I live in Indiana, you insensitive clod!

      We've only been changing clocks for 13 years, and I'm still not over it.
      In fact, it was our change that proved that DST does NOT save energy. More energy is spent cooling our homes earlier in the day as we arrive home at a earlier, and hotter, time of day.
      Cooling burns more coal than light bulbs.

      --
      Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
  2. For christ sake people it's a clock. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's just a clock - all this BS is getting ridicules.

    How about just getting out of bed an hour later, or going to bed an hour earlier. Jesus, grow the fuck up.

    PS I live in Washington state.

    1. Re:For christ sake people it's a clock. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't work that way. When you go to work and do basically everything has an impact on your circadian rhythm. Most people's body temperature hits it's maximum about 9am in large part due to rushing to get to work. That body temperature is just as important as what the sunlight is doing.

      Just because people like you don't actually know anything about this, doesn't mean it isn't a massive problem. If it were just a matter of people being immature, you wouldn't see this affecting such a large portion of the populace. Maintaining a similar wake up and bed time does somewhat help, it's not anywhere near good enough when everything else you do is based upon the clock and has to coordinate with everybody else.

    2. Re:For christ sake people it's a clock. by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Nothing is stopping you from fucking with your own clocks twice a year but the rest of us have better things to do.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    3. Re:For christ sake people it's a clock. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like... talk about it on slashdot....

    4. Re:For christ sake people it's a clock. by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      No it is provably a matter of deaths and maiming because of this stupidity of screwing around with the clock.

      If you need to save candle tallow, the centuries old reason this system was invented, then jerk around with your own clock on your own time

    5. Re:For christ sake people it's a clock. by Fly+Swatter · · Score: 1

      At this point It is change for the sake of change. It is annoying. If you have a collection of nice analog clocks it is a PITA plus additional wear on them. Even half the modern digital clocks still need changing. It interferes with sleep rhythms. I don't care, just stick with one or the other and we won't have to be bothered with this ever again.

    6. Re:For christ sake people it's a clock. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or reply to dumbasses on slashdot.

    7. Re:For christ sake people it's a clock. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or be a dumbass on slashdot at all.

    8. Re:For christ sake people it's a clock. by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      Nothing is stopping you from leaving your clocks alone either.

    9. Re:For christ sake people it's a clock. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Nothing is stopping you from fucking with your own clocks twice a year but the rest of us have better things to do.

      Wow - you're usually not so intense, my man.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    10. Re:For christ sake people it's a clock. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Nothing is stopping you from leaving your clocks alone either.

      I think everyone should use their Gawd given right to determine their own time. See my queef based time system elsewhere in this topic.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    11. Re:For christ sake people it's a clock. by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Wow - you're usually not so intense, my man.

      I ran out of Xanax because of the time change!

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    12. Re:For christ sake people it's a clock. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Wow - you're usually not so intense, my man.

      I ran out of Xanax because of the time change!

      Well played sir! A good Sunday morning laugh.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    13. Re:For christ sake people it's a clock. by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      You're so senile you're posting in a daylight savings time thread about robots. You're unhinged, you've lost it.

  3. Studies have shown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A whole bunch of statistical correlations.

  4. In the state of Washington? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the state of Washington?

    I sure hope that the state of California ditched their unique IT janitor from San Jose!

    Crash Dummy Redux == CDR == Christopher Dale Reimer == creimer. He has a total of 50+ sock puppet accounts on Slashdot!
    Proof: They all post the same sock puppets karma whoring and/or bragging stories and/or spam links.

    Here are two identical posts from 2 different sock puppets:
    Crash Dummy Redux:
    https://slashdot.org/comments....
    The Original CDR:
    https://ask.slashdot.org/comme...

    Last year, I proved to creimer that I was running a click bot to inflate the views on his stupid channel and he admitted it! He has even written about it on twitter, go check and you will see.

    I specifically targeted music videos to make him believe that he had just discovered a new Klondike! It was very funny to watch him come on Slashdot bragging about how much his new music videos were successful before I finally told him about the click bot!

    Then, when the party was over, I proved to him that I was the one inflating his views, I told him in advance that I would stop the views on one specific video which I did and he confirmed that fact on twitter.

    Well, he just posted a imaginary story here where he pretends that pedophiles were looking at his kid music video. Maybe he figures that pedophiles are better click bait material. My bot isn't a pedophile! No pedophiles looked at his video at all!

    See his post here:
    https://medium.com/@cdreimerth...

    He is such a liar and a thief! He will say or do anything just to get 1 click on his stupid videos which have amazon affiliate links attached to them all over the place!

    --
    -the biggest loser on Slashdot

    1. Re:In the state of Washington? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We need to breed it with Kendall and set it loose on the Chinese internet, see what happens.

  5. Weren't we just keeping it by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    for retail? Studies showed people shopped more when the sun was out, so retail used to fight to keep DST. With retail's influence waning there's not a ton of campaign dollars to push it anymore.

    True story, the Fast Food joints in my hometown successfully fought off projects to build freeways through town for years because they didn't folks hopping on a freeway to get across town and not passing their restaurants on the way to work.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Weren't we just keeping it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Motors_streetcar_conspiracy

  6. But think of the children! by skids · · Score: 3, Informative

    The only source of potential pushback I'm aware on this is parents who don't want their kids waiting for the bus in the dark (that happens with the DST-all-year option) Which they may not realize until after they've lived with it. The standard-time-all-year option ends up with everyone driving hoe from work in the dark more days per year. Let the royal rumble commence.

    We of course could effectively have the DST-all-year solution and stay on standard time if all businesses and government offices changed their hours. Good luck with that.

    1. Re:But think of the children! by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The only source of potential pushback I'm aware on this is parents who don't want their kids waiting for the bus in the dark (that happens with the DST-all-year option)

      That's not nearly enough of a reason to keep playing this twice-a-year circle jerk with the clocks. It's just not.

      Those parents will just have to grit their teeth and stop imagining every bad thing in the world that could possibly happen to their children. Maybe teach them not to stand next to the road in the dark (which they really should already be teaching them).

      Seriously, I don't care what time they pick as long as they pick one and stick to it.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    2. Re:But think of the children! by msauve · · Score: 1

      "Extended daylight in the evening is also better for kids..."

      But think of the children being raised by idiot legislators who think they can control celestial movements. There's no such thing as "extended daylight" due to a change in wall time. The sun comes and goes as it will, laws can't change that.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    3. Re:But think of the children! by iggymanz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      so change the time your school starts if it means so much in your district. leave the rest of us out of this mass mental retardation invented to save candle tallow

    4. Re:But think of the children! by Darinbob · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Whether DST results in waiting for the bus in the dark depends on location. Time zone borders are drawn in very strange ways, and sunrise for one person can be over an hour different from another person in the same time zone.

      And in winter when there's no DST, there just aren't enough daylight hours anyway to cover both waiting for the bus going to school or walking home from the bus after school.

    5. Re:But think of the children! by sjames · · Score: 2

      But laws can shift our reckoning of time such that we have the daylight when our schedules are more likely to allow us to enjoy it.

    6. Re:But think of the children! by bobby · · Score: 1

      The only source of potential pushback I'm aware on this is parents who don't want their kids waiting for the bus in the dark...

      As far as I know / remember, that is the only reason we change the clocks. In this modern age of cheap bright LED flashlights, I don't know if it's such a big deal.

      But a better solution: let the kids start school an hour later and go home an hour later. I'm not sure if this is true now, but years ago most juvenile crime was committed after school and before the parents get home. So it may be a win-win.

      Oh, worried about after-school outdoor sports, etc? It's okay, let them continue what they're doing now, and adapt indoor / class schedules. It can be done.

    7. Re:But think of the children! by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      so change the time your school starts if it means so much in your district

      That's much more impractical, especially for those trying to mesh work schedule with school schedule.

    8. Re:But think of the children! by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Wait, wait, what if the numbers existed separately and were not actually celestial movements? What if the numbers were arbitrary?

      What if we had a 25 hour day, would the Sun not still come and go as it will?

      And if Friday consisted of 3 hours, would the Sun not still come and go the same?

    9. Re:But think of the children! by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Informative

      Those parents will just have to grit their teeth and stop imagining every bad thing in the world that could possibly happen to their children.

      The Seattle Times has a better article regarding the proposed change.

      As that article points out, 'a survey by the National Safety Council of 42 states and the District of Columbia that found daylight saving time had “little or no effect on the number of early-morning traffic fatalities among schoolchildren.”'.

      That article also points out that, here in Washington state, kids are already standing out in the dark waiting for their busses for a short part of the year. If people are that concerned about it, they should convince the schools to change their schedules.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    10. Re:But think of the children! by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Interesting

      most juvenile crime was committed after school and before the parents get home.

      Supposedly, that is also when most teenage pregnancies are initiated.

      Start school later: What's the big deal?

    11. Re:But think of the children! by bobby · · Score: 1

      Supposedly, that is also when most teenage pregnancies are initiated.

      I wasn't aware of that but it makes perfect sense, esp. remembering childhood / teen years.

      Start school later: What's the big deal?

      Thanks for reminding me of that- it's been a frequent news topic recently. I know I would have done better in school with an extra hour of sleep. I know I know, "go to bed an hour earlier". Well, it doesn't work no matter how hard I try.

      I think we've agreed on a plan!

    12. Re:But think of the children! by DamonHD · · Score: 2

      People keep saying this as if it were meaningful. Here in London UK daylight length changes between ~8h and ~16h between mid-winter and mid-summer.

      What does fiddling with an hour do other than make work and complexity?

      Our internal clocks remain driven by light, including sunlight.

      Rgds

      Damon

      --
      http://m.earth.org.uk/
    13. Re:But think of the children! by rossdee · · Score: 3, Insightful

      " parents who don't want their kids waiting for the bus in the dark"

      A way around that is to have schools closed in the winter, and open all summer. (instead of them being open all winter and closed in the summer) It would also save the kids from waiting for the bus outside when its -20f (-40f windchill) or having to close schools when thr roads are blocked with snow.

    14. Re:But think of the children! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give the kid a candle or a torch FFS. Maybe in the area you live, there is electricity, in which case you can install street lights.

    15. Re:But think of the children! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      That would make life difficult for parents who need to get their kids ready for school and then get themselves to work though.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    16. Re: But think of the children! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the phrase "Think of the children" should earn somebody a 9 iron swing right in the nuts.

    17. Re:But think of the children! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... when our schedules are more likely to allow us to enjoy it.

      Around here the Sun rises at about 04:30 and sets at 21:00 in the middle of Summer.

      Get your lazy ass out of bed earlier. You can weed your flower garden or whatever it is you want to do when the Sun is up in the morning, before you go to work. Quit fucking up things for the other 6.99999999999 billion people on the planet; when your weeds get pulled isn't our problem.

      Everything isn't just about you.

    18. Re: But think of the children! by peragrin · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a typical base!ment dweller.

      Some of us enjoy the evening hours after work.

      In the east coast USA. Twith out dst the sun will set at 6pm by labor day.

      That leave 6 weeks were high School sports are played in total dark.

      Heck just driving halfway across one time zone can have amajor effect on outdoor activities. Near Boston the longest day of the year is done by 9 pm,. Without daylight savings time it is done by 8 pm.
        Yet on the other side of the same time zone it is 10:30 pm and 9:30 pm. Respectfully.

      Yes the time zones are bigger than an hour difference. Only basement dwelling idiots haven't observed that fact.

      Try spending time outside morning and evening and you too will be pro DST.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    19. Re: But think of the children! by DamonHD · · Score: 1

      Yes the time zones are bigger than an hour difference. Only basement dwelling idiots haven't observed that fact.

      Which wasn't my point AT ALL. The seasonal change in day length is far more than any 1 hour shift, and not all use cases are the same as your use cases.

      And why so damn rude also? There is no need.

      --
      http://m.earth.org.uk/
    20. Re: But think of the children! by msauve · · Score: 1

      Find a boss who'll let you work 8-4 in the summer instead of 9-5.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    21. Re:But think of the children! by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      There's no such thing as "extended daylight" due to a change in wall time.
      Yes, there is, idiot.

      The sun comes and goes as it will, laws can't change that.
      That is why you adjust the clock ... simple ... how braindead are people in our times?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    22. Re:But think of the children! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The standard-time-all-year option ends up with everyone driving hoe from work in the dark more days per year. Let the royal rumble commence.

      If you don't want to drive home in the dark, have your municipality install street lights.

      Seriously: we live in a post-Edison, post-Tesla world. Turn on the fucking light switch and get over "dark".

      If we're going to get rid of DST, we should go to Standard Time as that's how time zones (with local solar noon) were created for, and we all managed to survive with sunset being "early".

    23. Re: But think of the children! by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      You made a typo, you meant 10 - 4, right?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    24. Re:But think of the children! by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Yeah,
      but is it not insane that little children have to be at school before the parents have to be at work?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    25. Re:But think of the children! by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      so change the time your school starts if it means so much in your district

      That's much more impractical, especially for those trying to mesh work schedule with school schedule.

      I've noticed that the folks who hate DST don't care bout anything more than how inconvenienced they are with having to reset their clocks. As Iggymanz notes, disrupt the school day, disrupt an entire process - they don't care how much trouble others have, as long as they get their way.

      I'd be willing to wager that most live in apartments, don't have work that requires going outside, or no evening chores. But that clock shift - insufferable!

      In other words, everyone else adjust their schedules all over the place. I'm off to play FortNite.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    26. Re: But think of the children! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, like those parents aren't driving their kids to school every morning.

      Parents that are concerned about their kids walking to the bus in the dark but not actually driving their kids is a narrow edge case, and you know it. There is a reason every grade school is a traffic jam on weekday mornings.

    27. Re:But think of the children! by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      That would make life difficult for parents who need to get their kids ready for school and then get themselves to work though.

      You are under the mistaken assumption that they care about others inconvenience.

      The most vociferous opponents of DST tend to come from places where it means the least. The closer you get to the Equator, the less seasonal differential between light/dark cycles. When you are in the far north or south, no amount of clock diddling will help. Seasonal extremes are just beyond adjustment.

      But there are those mid-northern or mid-southern temperate zones. Damn! Here in PA, before we changed the clocks this morning, it was getting light out way too early for my schedule. But my schedule aside, light at 0530 is less useful than light at 7 p.m. P> We're all living on an oblate spheroid orbiting a single main source of light. And we're on a tilt as well. We'll ignore wobble for the moment.

      There is simply no problem free way to work the time of day. Any fix will simply introduce new problems.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    28. Re:But think of the children! by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1
      I think that the government telling us what time it is is an unforgivable infringement upon out basic freedoms. I call for humans having the right and dignity to set their own time, as they see fit. Stand up to the man!

      In the spirit of the people grabbing back their freedoms, I will now observe only my own clock.

      The metric clock. the minute is based on 100 seconds, the hour 100 minutes, and the day 10 hours.

      But none of this numerical bullshit. The basic unit the second, will now be known as the queef. Standard units apply scaling up and down.

      The year will consist of 10 months, or Squanches.

      Wake Up America!!!!

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    29. Re: But think of the children! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Colorado, a bunch of school districts have been changing their start time to 9 or 9:30 and it hasn't caused the world to end.
      The biggest issue is for families where all the parents work, and employers aren't willing to adjust schedules.

    30. Re: But think of the children! by Mspangler · · Score: 1

      My last job ran from 7:30 to 4:00. In the winter the sun came up a half hour after I got to work, and set while going home. With an 8 1/2 hour work day and 8 hours of day light no clock manipulation can save you.

    31. Re:But think of the children! by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Your local issue does not rise to the importance such that half the world needs to fuck with it's clocks twice a year, and be confused about what time it is around the world because of this. Half of businesses already do summer and winter hours anyway, due to the change in customer visits. There's no reason everyone else can't do likewise for fear of the dark.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    32. Re: But think of the children! by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      Or band together with your fellow employees and demand summer and winter hours for everyone.

      I really don't get how people think that they're so special that they can't be bothered to adjust their life, but expect everyone else to fuck with the clocks twice a year.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    33. Re:But think of the children! by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      You've got it backwards.

      I've noticed that people who like DST don't care about how inconvenienced everyone else is having to adjust their clocks twice a year. That disrupts everyone's day twice a year, and they don't even get a choice in it. They don't care how much trouble others have, as long as they get their way.

      In other words, everyone can adjust their schedules as needed, and not force people to do it if they don't want to.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    34. Re:But think of the children! by HiThere · · Score: 1

      You're acting like those times are set in stone. If parents don't like the timing, take it up with the local school board. Washington hasn't grabbed control over THAT part of the school system.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    35. Re:But think of the children! by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 2

      If people are that concerned about it, they should convince the schools to change their schedules.

      Or teach children not to stand next to the road, which parents should be telling their children anyway.

      There is simply no need to screw around with every clock in the entire country twice a year because some parents are too dumb to tell their kids not to stand in the road in the dark.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    36. Re: But think of the children! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      adjusting the clock does not in anyway change how long the sun will be present in any one area. You are merely altering your personal perception of "when" that lit period occurs. No additional daylight period is being created in an form.

    37. Re:But think of the children! by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      You've got it backwards.

      I've noticed that people who like DST don't care about how inconvenienced everyone else is having to adjust their clocks twice a year. That disrupts everyone's day twice a year, and they don't even get a choice in it.

      People are killing themselves because life simply isn't worth living ewhen you have to (quick Brenda - get the children out of the room, lest they be permanently damaged - adjust a clock!

      I can see it in the future, Swat teams entering houses and summarily executing people who do not set a clock once, and leave it there forever. If the batteries run out, or you let your phone discharge, no excuses, you are done.

      PThey don't care how much trouble others have, as long as they get their way.

      In other words, everyone can adjust their schedules as needed, and not force people to do it if they don't want to.

      I trust you are being sarcastic. Otherwise, we need to get you on a suicide watch. Let us know, because one life lost is too many to the tyranny of clock settings and time zones. We love ya bro, and would hate to lose ya!

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    38. Re: But think of the children! by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      Find a boss who'll let you work 8-4 in the summer instead of 9-5.

      Mine for example. A big multinational corporation. Want to come to work at 7? At 12? Either is fine. There's enough overlap for anything important that needs to be communicated face-to-face. And after 19 or so, people stop coming to bother you and you can get some shit done.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    39. Re:But think of the children! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who told you to have kids?

      Should have thought that one through beforehand...

    40. Re: But think of the children! by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      It's not parents who say that. Anyone who has raised kids dies not want to suffer the pain of getting kids on a new wake schedule before they're ready for it.

    41. Re: But think of the children! by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      Find a boss who'll let you work 8-4 in the summer instead of 9-5.

      Plenty of white collar jobs have flex hours, core hours, or something similar. Many blue collar jobs already use the sun not the clock to decide when work starts.

    42. Re: But think of the children! by sjames · · Score: 2

      Had the clock been on DST in the winter, you would at least have an hour at home before the sun set. Better than the noything you get by falling back.

    43. Re: But think of the children! by sjames · · Score: 1

      It's easier to legislate DST for all than it is to find enough unicorns to do it on an individual basis.

    44. Re:But think of the children! by sjames · · Score: 0

      middle of Summer.

      The proposal under discussion is about the daylight hours IN THE WINTER.

      Unless you live in some crazy ass place where you have summer in the winter, your entire train of thought is irrelevant to the question at hand.

    45. Re: But think of the children! by Mspangler · · Score: 1

      That leaves you getting up at 5 AM, and your biological bottom is 4 AM, not good for your health or alertness. And what do you hope to accomplish in that last hour of light anyway. Shopping doesn't need light, it's still freezing, overcast, and usually snowy. Time go home regardless of a longer twilight.

    46. Re: But think of the children! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of us enjoy the evening hours after work.

      In the east coast USA. Twith out dst the sun will set at 6pm by labor day.

      I go for walks in the park in the summer after work. I'd still gladly sacrifice the extra hour of walking to get an extra hour of sleep in the morning. DST is tyranny.

    47. Re: But think of the children! by sjames · · Score: 1

      OTOH, you get in the house before the temperature starts dropping due to sunset.

    48. Re: But think of the children! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, around here we get more than 16 hours of darkness at the solstice and you'd have to carefully arrange the day so that you get twilight before and after work with all of the light occurring during the day.

      One way or the other you'd have kids commuting in the dark. Or they'd do so without working parents.

    49. Re: But think of the children! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You speak the truth

    50. Re:But think of the children! by aybiss · · Score: 1

      "As far as I know / remember, that is the only reason we change the clocks."

      Then you know / remember nothing.

      --
      It's OK Bender, there's no such thing as 2.
    51. Re:But think of the children! by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Those parents will just have to grit their teeth and stop imagining every bad thing in the world that could possibly happen to their children. Maybe teach them not to stand next to the road in the dark (which they really should already be teaching them).

      Or gee, I don't know, start school later? It probably makes little difference for young kids, but for sure by the time they are high-school-aged, studies show that they pretty much don't learn anything before 10 A.M. anyway, so you might as start school two hours later and solve that problem. :-)

      (Yes, I'm exaggerating for comic effect here, but there actually are numerous studies showing a real improvement in grades if you start school later.)

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    52. Re:But think of the children! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The standard-time-all-year option ends up with everyone driving home from work in the dark more days per year.

      How? Do the leave work at 8PM? I left work at 6:00PM on Friday and it was not dark yet. Now today it won't get dark until close to 8PM. I actually prefer it to be darker when I leave in the summer so my car isn't as hot!

    53. Re:But think of the children! by phoenix_rizzen · · Score: 1

      Set the clock back an hour from standard time, and leave it there.

      That way, it's light out in the mornings in winter, and dark before midnight in the summers.

      But, if that's too drastic for people, then leave it at standard time.

      Staying on DST does things backwards, making it dark in the mornings in winter, and still light out at midnight in the summer.

    54. Re:But think of the children! by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      I've noticed that the folks who hate DST don't care bout anything more than how inconvenienced they are with having to reset their clocks. As Iggymanz notes, disrupt the school day, disrupt an entire process - they don't care how much trouble others have, as long as they get their way.

      It isn't about inconvenience. It is about health. That much lost sleep causes serious problems for human physiology. We simply aren't built to handle it. If the time change were gradual, at a minute per day or something, it wouldn't be a problem, but as it is, people die because of DST. The time changes causes an increase in:

      • Heart attacks
      • Car accidents
      • Industrial accidents

      Additionally, the economic cost is huge. Fatigued workers take more sick days and are more distracted when they actually show up for work, to the tune of almost half a billion dollars every spring.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    55. Re:But think of the children! by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      If we're going to get rid of DST, we should go to Standard Time as that's how time zones (with local solar noon) were created for, and we all managed to survive with sunset being "early".

      Each state (or, for long states, part of a state) should choose whether to be permanently on standard time or DST.

      If you don't want to drive home in the dark, have your municipality install street lights.

      The longer after dark you drive home, the more likely you are to fall asleep behind the wheel. It's not about street lights. It's about biology. Maybe self-driving cars will fix this eventually, but until then, I suspect most areas will pick permanent DST rather than permanent standard time, for precisely that reason.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    56. Re:But think of the children! by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      It isn't about inconvenience. It is about health. That much lost sleep causes serious problems for human physiology.

      So every time anyone loses an hour or gains an hour of sleep and it causes serious health problems, it would be an easily proveable hypothesis, and a theory acceptable to near certainty. Because in everyday life, people lose sleep or sleep in. If it is a true health crisis, the proof is so simple as to be something that we can find in ourselves. "Oops - I missed an hour's sleep , that must be the cause of my arthritis. And my uncle slept in yesterday - and we found him dead in bed - sleeping an extra hour caused this.

      You know, seems like your sleep apocalypse needs enforced by law, my very excitable boi.

      By the way - shouldn't insomniacs all die after a few sleepless nights?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    57. Re:But think of the children! by bobby · · Score: 1

      The basic unit the second, will now be known as the queef.

      So like this: Hey Ol, I need a hand with something here- do you have a queef?

      Did I get it right?

    58. Re:But think of the children! by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      The basic unit the second, will now be known as the queef.

      So like this: Hey Ol, I need a hand with something here- do you have a queef?

      Did I get it right?

      In principle, but in practice perhaps not.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    59. Re:But think of the children! by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      So every time anyone loses an hour or gains an hour of sleep and it causes serious health problems, it would be an easily proveable hypothesis, and a theory acceptable to near certainty.

      In fact, it is an easily provable hypothesis, and it is thoroughly proven. We do the same experiment every year, and every year, we see the same statistically significant increase in deaths. How many experiments do you need before you believe the numbers? Yeah, the odds of actual death are small individually, but even that small probability multiplied times a population of 325 million people in the U.S. equals several hundred extra deaths each year, all of which are 100% avoidable. Not to mention that everybody feels like crap for a day or more.

      By the way - shouldn't insomniacs all die after a few sleepless nights?

      No. In healthy individuals, sleep deprivation usually just causes psychosis. It causes premature death only in people whose hearts are already marginal.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    60. Re:But think of the children! by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      So every time anyone loses an hour or gains an hour of sleep and it causes serious health problems, it would be an easily proveable hypothesis, and a theory acceptable to near certainty.

      In fact, it is an easily provable hypothesis, and it is thoroughly proven. We do the same experiment every year, and every year, we see the same statistically significant increase in deaths.

      Does this statistically significant increase include those who get the same amount of sleep? Are their no effects related to the time of year?

      Do our bodies simply know that the standard time is the one true time, that is dangerous to alter lest we die?

      Here's a little thing that might need explained. According to your apparent sources, the heart attack rate drops when moving back to standard time from Daylight savings time. What causes this? 24 percent increase in spring, and a 21 percent drop in the fall. https://www.sciencealert.com/d...

      Seems like the body knows exactly what time it demands, eh?

      So you have to not only say that going forward kills people, and going backwards saves them. What happens if we keep moving the clock backwards? Will we eliminate heart attacks? What are the effects between the equater and the higher latitudes? If disruption in sleep, night, and day cycles is the cause, people in places like Alaska should be dropping over.

      I don't necessarily dispute the DST as a killer numbers. But here's the issue. We get to see many accusations. https://fee.org/articles/dayli... REad it. Here the poor fellow is whining about being groggy because of the change in teh fall. Oddly, that's when WebMD says that people have less health problems - when moving back.

      And interestingly, the same site claims that there are less assaults during the DST months because less people are outside after dark. I wonder how many of those were killed during those standard time assaults?

      But that's all beside the point, because when I see not necessarily supported "data" I get pretty suspicious.

      Regardless, does this mean that we need to classify loss of 40 minutes of sleep (from the last link) as a health hazard? Should tthis be made law? If we cannot change between DST and EST without causeing many deaths, should we likewise not cover people for risk-taking behavior like going to different time zones?

      I never notice the DST shift, but as a frewuent traveler, going between the east and west coast can be a real issue. In fact, if the DST killer is real, flying back anf forth across several time zones should kill people easily. I feel like crap when I'm jet lagged, and quite the same with the time of day shifts. It's much the same thing, only much exaggerated.

      As well, when I've gone to Alaska, the effect is even heightened - a 4 hour time differential, plus drastically extended daylight in the summer, and a lot of darkeness during the winter.

      My ending point? It the data is real, they do have to eliminate a whole lot of other things, then explain how thousands of people voluntarily go through much more drastic changes of exactly the same phenomenon and returning happy. And I've been on cruises to Alaska with some people who were obviously fulfillingt a bucket list.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    61. Re:But think of the children! by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      So every time anyone loses an hour or gains an hour of sleep and it causes serious health problems, it would be an easily proveable hypothesis, and a theory acceptable to near certainty.

      In fact, it is an easily provable hypothesis, and it is thoroughly proven. We do the same experiment every year, and every year, we see the same statistically significant increase in deaths.

      Does this statistically significant increase include those who get the same amount of sleep? Are their no effects related to the time of year?

      You're assuming that it is generally possible to get the same amount of sleep when your alarm clock wakes you up an hour earlier than usual. It is just barely possible, if you plan very carefully, to start slipping your schedule earlier starting a few days before, to minimize the impact, but most people don't even try, because it is too much of a pain in the backside. So the net effect is that nearly everyone gets an hour less sleep.

      And no, this has nothing to do with the time of year. The statistically significant increase is relative to the week before and the week after. There is literally a huge single-day spike in traffic accidents on the Monday after the time change, compared with every other day of the year.

      Do our bodies simply know that the standard time is the one true time, that is dangerous to alter lest we die?

      Our bodies do have a preference for something vaguely resembling sleeping during the dark hours and being awake during the light hours, but they tolerate a lot. What they don't particularly like is suddenly being forced to get up an hour earlier. It is roughly equivalent to the entire country being jet-lagged on the same day.

      Worse, there's a network effect that compounds the problem. Most of the time, car accidents involve more than one vehicle. If one driver is tired, he or she might make a mistake, but when that other person is also tired, he or she is less likely to react to that mistake in a way that prevents the accident.

      Here's a little thing that might need explained. According to your apparent sources, the heart attack rate drops when moving back to standard time from Daylight savings time. What causes this? 24 percent increase in spring, and a 21 percent drop in the fall. https://www.sciencealert.com/d...

      People often get more sleep on one end, and less sleep on the other end. I would think the difference would be obvious.

      I don't necessarily dispute the DST as a killer numbers. But here's the issue. We get to see many accusations. https://fee.org/articles/dayli... REad it. Here the poor fellow is whining about being groggy because of the change in teh fall. Oddly, that's when WebMD says that people have less health problems - when moving back.

      On one end, pretty much everybody gets less sleep. On the other end, it varies from person to person. In theory, you should get more sleep, but in practice, ever since they changed the date when the DST change occurs, my body clock starts shifting at or around the earlier date, and I actually start getting less sleep for the week prior to the time change, and only then get a full night's sleep. It is really quite bizarre. But this learned behavior likely explains why the momentary drop in the week after the shift to standard time is less than the momentary spike in the week after the shift to DST.

      I never notice the DST shift, but as a frewuent traveler, going between the east and west coast can be a real issue. In fact, if the DST killer is real, flying back anf forth across several time zones should kill people easily. I feel like crap when I'm jet lagged, and quite the same with

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  7. Re:APK Hosts File Engine for MacOS... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Protects against ALL known & unknown vulnerabilities.

    This line always cracks me up and it's proof positive that you're full of shit.

    You can't protect against unknown vulnerabilities, you fucktard- that's why they're labeled "unknown".

  8. Re:APK Hosts File Engine for MacOS... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why dO yoU tYPe LikE a sEriAL kILler?

    And this bullshit: "Hardcode fav. sites u spend"

    What do you do with all the time you save typing "u" instead of "you"? Beat off to Ann Coulter or something?

    You're such a retard that if not for your constant spamming of this site, I might have tried your product.

    But after seeing you spew your ignorant shit in here every day you've convinced me to never even think about using it.

  9. I was around when the USA did this, it was hell. by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I was around the last time the USA got rid of daylight-savings time, in 1973-1975. It was total hell. Children went to school in pitch darkness and bitter cold, and people drove to work in the dark. I can't imagine who would want this again. You get rid of a one-hour change for a much worse difficulty every day for months on end.

    These days, many more working people travel regularly than in 1973, when jet travel was so unreachable for the common man that rich people were called the "jet set". Most working people today deal with much worse than a one-hour change on a regular basis.

  10. Embrace the Light by mentil · · Score: 0

    "ditch the switch, bring the light, and defeat the dark night"

    I'm voting AGAINST the darkness, and FOR the light! Who's with me?! /s

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    1. Re:Embrace the Light by Scarletdown · · Score: 2

      I want to cast Magic Missile.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    2. Re: Embrace the Light by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a dagger that's +3 against ogres.

    3. Re:Embrace the Light by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want to cast Magic Missile.

      Why are you casting magic missile? There's nothing to attack here!

  11. Re:I was around when the USA did this, it was hell by R.Mo_Robert · · Score: 4, Informative

    I was around the last time the USA got rid of daylight-savings time, in 1973-1975. It was total hell. Children went to school in pitch darkness and bitter cold, and people drove to work in the dark. I can't imagine who would want this again. You get rid of a one-hour change for a much worse difficulty every day for months on end.

    These days, many more working people travel regularly than in 1973, when jet travel was so unreachable for the common man that rich people were called the "jet set". Most working people today deal with much worse than a one-hour change on a regular basis.

    Technically, that was actually year-round Daylight Saving Time, i.e., elimination of standard time, not elimination of DST. But the first link suggests that's also what is proposed here (they technically don't hate DST, just the change--and so-called "standard time," in which we actually now spend less time of the year in than DST--is usually the one people object to). This would indeed make the morning sunrise later with respect to the clock, an issue in winter for many regions of the US, the argument usually being that children would go to school in the dark in the morning (I'm not sure the "going to work" argument would hold up since where I live, it's already dark after work during standard time by late November, so it's either one or the other).

    --
    R.Mo
  12. Move our clocks back 30 minutes... by DatbeDank · · Score: 1

    And be done with this. No fucking reason to keep doing it anymore!

  13. Re:I was around when the USA did this, it was hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, I lived somewhere ACTUALLY cold with real winter darkness that has never had DST for 40 years. I have been on the idiot clock (DST) for the last 5 years and an hour of sunlight here or there isn't worth the month I am now messed up every year.

  14. Let's move to the real DST by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2

    Daylight Slacker's Time - Fall back an hour in Fall, and Fall back an hour in Spring, too. More sleep twice a year!

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  15. Re:I was around when the USA did this, it was hell by dryeo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Depends on where you live, as in latitude and longitude. My Province is wide enough that there is an hour difference between the east and west parts. One part gets screwed either way when sunrise varies by an hour across the time zone.
    Then there's the north where the sun comes up at maybe 10:00 and sets at 2:00 or worse. Doesn't matter where you set the clocks, it's usually dark and cold.
    I'm dreading the next week as I'll be getting up an hour early and love this news as my Premier basically said, "whatever California, Oregon and Washington does, we'll do as we should all be in sync". Feds aren't involved here either. Don't understand why your feds get to say what timezone a State is in.
    There's also a private members bill in the legislature to create a new time zone along the coast, always on DST. Might even pass if the Greens support it.

    --
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  16. I get that switching times twice a year is bad.... by mark-t · · Score: 1

    ... but there are quite proven medical benefits to having at least some amount of exposure to sunlight early in the day.... and while it's bad enough in the wintertime near the 49th parallel when the sun doesn't rise until nearly 8 am (or sometimes even later) in the middle of winter, with DST in effect, the sun wouldn't be up until nearly 9am. That might not seem to directly matter much for people who have to be at work before 8am anyways, or often even earlier, but by moving sunrise to an hour later than what it currently is, the decision to move the clocks ahead is going to impact *FAR* more people when the sun is already rising quite late.

    At the very least, you know for sure that school-aged kids would be adversely impacted by this during the middle of winter, by not having exposure to sunlight before they start their day.

    But hey... I'm sure that the convenience of an extra hour of daylight at the end of the day is going to *far* outweigh the medical issues associated with the lack of morning sunlight, amiright?

  17. Re:I was around when the USA did this, it was hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was around the last time the USA got rid of daylight-savings time, in 1973-1975. It was total hell. Children went to school in pitch darkness and bitter cold, and people drove to work in the dark. I can't imagine who would want this again.

    I prefer driving to and from work in the dark than driving there and back with the sunrise and sunset blinding me for most of my drive when "winter time" suddenly begins. You tell me which situation is more dangerous.

  18. Re:I was around when the USA did this, it was hell by sjames · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure hell is the right word for it. My friends and I enjoyed having an excuse to take a flashlight to school.

  19. Re:I was around when the USA did this, it was hell by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2

    I was a part-time researcher at a college in Norway for three years. I'd come out in the summer and work for a month or so. There were 2 or three hours of darkness at night. But this was obviously a lot less of a burden than the 9 hour time change every time I flew there and back.

    These days it is not unusual for me to go from California to Europe every month, or at least to another US time zone. You learn jet-lag regimens, how to time your flights, you get the right drugs from your doctor (never Ambien - I think it makes people sleep-drive and kill their children). I wonder if these people complaining about a 1-hour change never even cross the country.

  20. The reason: Stores did not want to change signs. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    The original reason for DST: Stores and parks did not want to change the signs that said when they would open, but they wanted to be open during daylight. However, this history does not mention that: Daylight Saving Time history.

  21. You're some real morons. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Real men don't live in society at all, following rules is for society members only. Real men shit in the woods and scrounge for food, mostly starve, die of dysentery. Real men don't need clean drinking water or medical care, real men.

    Real men would rather die out in the woods like old toothless redneck hermits, real men would.

  22. About time! (heh) by divide+overflow · · Score: 1

    DST is a waste of time. It is time for the U.S. to abolish it.

    1. Re:About time! (heh) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "DST is a waste of time." - Daylight Savings Time saved me so much time, I'll live till I'm 200 years old.

  23. Re:I was around when the USA did this, it was hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah that has a lot to do with the issue, derp.

  24. Re:I was around when the USA did this, it was hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would you rather make us all suffer as you do, and change the clocks 9 hours every six months?

    The proper hour to set your clock should be such that solar noon never, ever occurs before 12, and leave it there.

    And up north, don't start school before 9 am. Kids should be allowed to sleep a little later anyway.

  25. Re:I was around when the USA did this, it was hell by sjames · · Score: 1

    Perhaps you might find hell to be enjoyable, but for most, if you are enjoying aspects of it, it's not hell.

  26. #Read it again, Sam. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah that still has a lot to do with the issue, derp.

  27. Bad title by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

    They want to keep Daylight Saving Time year-round, not abolish it.

    Previous efforts had been to establish Standard Time year round, but it turns out people prefer that hour of sunlight in the evening rather than the morning.

    And, if the US Congress won’t allow it, the fallback is that Washington State move to Mountain Standard Time year round.

    I live in Washington State, and I support this message. And yes, I was a kid (in Washington State, no less) the last time the US as a whole tried this... and I don’t remember it being problematic for me.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Bad title by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      Previous efforts had been to establish Standard Time year round, but it turns out people prefer that hour of sunlight in the evening rather than the morning.

      Until they've experienced long mornings without sunlight, and then they'll miss it.

    2. Re:Bad title by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      Until they've experienced long mornings without sunlight, and then they'll miss it.

      I can only speak for myself, but - right now, in December and January, I'm going to work in the dark and coming home in the dark (Standard Time sunset in Seattle mid-December: 4:20pm). I wouldn't mind a chance to occasionally see some light as I'm leaving my office... of course, it'll be grey rainy light but whatever.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re:Bad title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just want the Sun to be at its zenith at noon. Is that so hard?

    4. Re:Bad title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They want to keep Daylight Saving Time year-round, not abolish it.

      They want to abolish Daylight Saving Time and keep Daylight Time year-round. That's an important distinction. Daylight Saving Time is the practice of changing time zones twice a year between a "Standard Time" zone and a "Daylight Time" zone. Daylight Time is the Standard Time shifted by 1 hour.

    5. Re:Bad title by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

      They want to keep Daylight Saving Time year-round, not abolish it.

      Florida was working on something similar (I can't be bothered to look it up), and what it boils down to is once they stop the biannual clock fuckery, businesses and what-not will be free to operate on the schedules they see fit.

      So in other words, if you don't want to get up at the ass crack of dawn, you can just open your business at 10am and stay open 'till 6pm, without Uncle Sam meddling with your clocks.

      --

      ---
      DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    6. Re:Bad title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DST year round would be my preference. I don't care if the sun is directly overhead at noon or not.

    7. Re:Bad title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until they've experienced long mornings without sunlight, and then they'll miss it.

      ... have you been to Washington State in the winter? The daylight hours are too short to possibly have sunlight in the morning unless you want sunset to be at noon.

    8. Re:Bad title by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I was a kid (in Washington State, no less) the last time the US as a whole tried this... and I don’t remember it being problematic for me.

      Bullshit. I have it under good authority from slashdot posters that as a child you were raped, killed, and generally couldn't handle the dark.

    9. Re:Bad title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They want to keep Daylight Saving Time year-round, not abolish it.

      So people *want* to go to work in the dark??? That's. Just. Weird.

      My beef with DST is that it's a kick in the teeth every spring: just as you start to see sunlight on your morning commute, bam, back to getting up in the dark for you!

    10. Re:Bad title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes we did. The Sunshine Protection Act was signed into law a year ago. We're waiting for Congress to act.

    11. Re:Bad title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best solution is to move everyone to coordinated universal time, so that everyone uses the same clock. Then people who want to can set their schedules as they like, either changing them to adjust to the seasons, or not. People can get used to the fact that noon in their town comes at 17:00 on the clock. It is just an arbitrary choice as to where to assign numbers, and when the day changes. It used to be that having the day change in the middle of the night meant that most people were sleeping, or at least not doing anything that relied on knowing the date, but now business, recreation, and socializing are conducted at all hours, so putting the day change in the middle of the night is not a big advantage.

  28. Re:The reason: Stores did not want to change signs by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

    The original reason for DST: Stores and parks did not want to change the signs that said when they would open

    The park nearest to my house has a sign that says "Closed one hour after sunset".

  29. Re:I was around when the USA did this, it was hell by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

    I'm dreading the next week as I'll be getting up an hour early and love this news as my Premier basically said, "whatever California, Oregon and Washington does, we'll do as we should all be in sync".

    California, Oregon, Washington, and British Columbia should form their own country.

    (I'm a Washington resident, and I'm not sure if I'm joking or not...)

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  30. Re:I was around when the USA did this, it was hell by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    Yeah I was going to school back then, and I don't recall it being "hell" either.

    You know what was hell? Back when we failed about 10 school levies in a row, and our school district implemented a split-schedule high school. I was going from 7am to 12 noon, and then for sports had to come back to school at 5pm. Now THAT was a pain in the keister.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  31. Re:I was around when the USA did this, it was hell by quenda · · Score: 1

    Children went to school in pitch darkness and bitter cold, and people drove to work in the dark.

    This makes no sense since DST does not apply in winter. Are you being sarcastic? Is DST somehow shifting the tilt of the earth's axis?
    You don't want to commute in darkness? Then move to a lower latitude. I lived in a far-north country once, and know how much long winter nights suck.
    A 1-hour shift in winter clock setting would only solve that problem for a narrow band of latitude anyway.
    Or get your local school system to adapt. How can you blame a summertime clock shift?

  32. Re:I was around when the USA did this, it was hell by Solandri · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was around the last time the USA got rid of daylight-savings time, in 1973-1975. It was total hell. Children went to school in pitch darkness and bitter cold, and people drove to work in the dark.

    The correct way to fix that is to change what time school and work starts. Not to change everyone's clocks. 7am or 8am may have been pitch darkness where you were. Other places it was fine. The places which are affected by longer night (higher latitudes, further west in the time zone) can simply change the start times for school and business in winter. If you insist on changing the clocks, everyone is affected - even people in areas where the time change offers no benefit and is tremendously inconvenient.

  33. Re:I was around when the USA did this, it was hell by dryeo · · Score: 1

    Perhaps, and don't forget the Yukon and Alaska. Problem is that secession is not easy. Most of the States and all of the Provinces would have to agree, probably along with our respective Federal governments. Also a referendum with a clear majority here, none of that 50%+1 means we're leaving. It's unclear what a clear majority is.

    --
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  34. Re:I was around when the USA did this, it was hell by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

    The correct way to fix that is to change what time school and work starts. Not to change everyone's clocks

    Except that it's much simpler to change the clock than to change every schedule, or worse, only part of the schedules.

    If you insist on changing the clocks, everyone is affected - even people in areas where the time change offers no benefit and is tremendously inconvenient.

    Then those areas can choose not to change the clock.

  35. Re:I was around when the USA did this, it was hell by MrKaos · · Score: 1

    In Australia the summer day is long and very hot. DST helps separate trades people and office workers on the road. One wants to avoid most of the heat of the day a and the other wants a little day left over.

    I think Seasonal Affective Disorder is also influenced by this, especially during winter when day becomes much shorter.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  36. Biblical reference by WoOS · · Score: 1

    I think the Bible says on the topic:

    "He who not changehet his sleeping hours on weekends throwhet the first minute against DST due to circadian cycles."

    or something similar ;-)

    1. Re:Biblical reference by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      The one probable old-wives-tale I heard was that there were people who had a real problem with switching to DST because “what happens if you die?”

      In the spring, you set your clocks ahead, essentially losing an hour of your life. If you make it to autumn, you get that hour back. But if you die before autumn, that’s an hour of your life that you lost.

      I’ll admit, it does sound like something someone in Indiana would say...

  37. Re:I was around when the USA did this, it was hell by fafalone · · Score: 1

    Those children also had an hour of extra daylight for activities at the end of the day; you know, when they were doing things instead of just getting ready for school; that's a lot more useful. And 9-5 means coming home in the dark in the winter; that sucks. I find it hard to believe anyone gets upset about having to go to work in the dark vs. still having daylight left after work.
    I can't image who wouldn't want this. Kids and adults alike, that extra hour of daylight after school or work is way better than simply having it be light in the morning where you're not doing anything other than getting ready and traveling to school/work.

  38. Re:I was around when the USA did this, it was hell by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

    The West shall rise again!

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  39. Re:I was around when the USA did this, it was hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Children went to school in pitch darkness and bitter cold, and people drove to work in the dark.

    If ONLY there were a way to make it so that school, work, and so on, starts an hour later. Sadly, it takes an act of congress for the local school district or a business to decide to open and shut an hour later... oh, WAIT. NO IT DOESN'T. These are changes that can be made at the local level, and also incrementally.

    "This month, instead of first period (or when you need to be here, or clock in, etc.,) being at 8:00AM, it's 8:30AM." Then a month later, it'll be 9:00.

    Solved.

  40. Re:I was around when the USA did this, it was hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you fucking traitors try that shit, the US government will crush you just like it did last time you scum tried it. We burned a path hundreds of miles long through your territory to show you you'd been defeated. We meant to cause a famine and mass death just to put a point on it, but it turned out you could eat black-eyed peas so it didn't happen. Evidently the lesson has been forgotten. Still, if you need another lesson we'll be willing to oblige.

    Through YOUR territory? You maybe should consult a map. Cali, Oregon & Washington are no the fuck where NEAR the "Confederacy". THEIR territory perhaps, and oh, PS, by the way... that was a DIFFERENT TIME. Different time AND different place. Different country, really.

    Since the regime pretending to be the US government right now seems hell bent for leather on destroying the US, if several states decided, "fuck it, we're out," they'd probably LET THEM GO, because that will further Putin's agenda of weakening or destroying the United States.

    PPS: Traitors beTRAY someone or something. Wanting not to be a part of your diseased, decaying, dead-ass shithole cuntry anymore is NOT the same thing. It's just people exercising the fundamental human right of self-determination.

  41. Re: I was around when the USA did this, it was hel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Boneheaded patriot retards love the War for Independence but hate the idea that anybody could leave their shit country with shittier traditions.

  42. DST by geographical area by Tomahawk · · Score: 1

    Some places benefit more from DST than others. Here in Ireland where there's only 7 hours of light in winter, DST moves those hours so those 7 hours occur at the more useful time of day. For summer we get 7 hours of night, so the change allows for better night time hours.

    So here DST is very useful.

    Location is everything when discussing DST, yet I've never seen a survey that links desire to keep/remove DST linked to location, specifically latitude and distance from your time-zone defining longitude. (i.e. latitude and what time local solar-noon occurs).

    I think this will show an obvious correlation, should it be undertaken.

    As for the heart attacks nonsense, while it can be shown that the number of heart attacks does increase on that particular day, it can also be shown the they do *not* increase for that particular week. The number of expected heart attacks fire that week is the same as any other week, they just occur earlier -- they would have happened anyway. Watch this video for the maths: https://youtu.be/XZGs5Im9f8Q

    1. Re:DST by geographical area by HiThere · · Score: 1

      FWIW, Ireland may be further North that Washington State of the US, but it's not *much* further North. Washington is one of the most northerly states in the US.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    2. Re:DST by geographical area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about traffic fatalities?

  43. The very term Daylight Saving Time shows ignorance by CrankyOldEngineer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Those of us who rise before sunrise (which is most people I know) understand that daylight is not saved. It is robbed from the morning daylight. Only an ignorant Congressman who has never seen a sunrise could possibly call it Daylight *Saving* Time. By the way, DST in the US is so long now that it practically coincides with the school year. If we went back to year-round standard time, any school district that wanted to could simply change their hours. Then nearly everyone could get the schedule that they want. Problem solved!

    --
    COE
  44. why laws should have expiration dates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DST (and for that matter, the legality of marijuana) is a perfect example of why laws, and I mean all laws, should have expiration dates where when due to expire, Congress has to vote to re-up them.

    Because many laws once passed, even if society reaches a point where they're no longer desirable, continue to stick around just because no one is willing to expend the political capital needed to take them down.

    1. Re:why laws should have expiration dates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My side of town benefits from a tax cut because 70 years ago there was a noisy factory. I like my tax cut and I won't let you "expire" it.

    2. Re:why laws should have expiration dates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a law is set to expire, but society still prefers the law in place, there's nothing to stop legislature from voting to extend the law. It would also provide an opportunity to reexamine the law and figure out where it could be improved upon, modernized and reformed, in case there were any flaws or oversights in the original legislature.

    3. Re:why laws should have expiration dates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My side of town wants the tax cut to remain, and the other side of town wants the tax cut to be abolished. Everyone is pulling the blanket in their direction and the outcome is decided by the majority weighted by loudness. Call it "what society prefers" if you want, but I don't think that such a cavemen process deserves such a refined name.

  45. Leave it Forward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the love of Pete, leave the clocks forward. There is no reason at all why the Sun should already be up when I go to work in the morning, and be nearly set when I get off work in the afternoon. It's the dumbest shit I have to deal with in life - having no usable daylight because we insist on immature, stupid teenage sophomoric ideas when it comes to sleep (duuuuuude I hate getting up early because I'm stuck in fucking teenage land in my head)...

    Grow the fuck up. Get up and go to work in the morning. Get done with that shit before the sun goes down so you can enjoy some daylight. Leave the clocks forward.

  46. Re:I was around when the USA did this, it was hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Boo fucking hoo. In the northern states in the winter, the day is NOT FUCKING LONG ENOUGH to both go to school/work and come home in the daylight. You're just picking one over the other.

    The benefits to daylight after work/school are undeniable. The science is settled on this and if you disagree you are a fucking moron.

  47. The real solution is solar time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real solution is solar time. Everyone has GPS clocks these days. Keeping time is not hard.

    I've done this with custom firmware on my clocks where the length of the second is not fixed, but rather is based on the math that puts the sunrise at the same clock time every day, year round. No fuss, no muss.

    Our current concept of timekeeping is completely antithetical to our biology. We naturally want to get up with the sunrise, and the only reason we don't is because a) we insist on staying up past our biological bedtime doing stupid shit and b) we have an artificial method of keeping time that is bad for our health.

    Ever since I started living on Solar time, my blood pressure has dropped 40 points, I've lost 60lbs, I no longer have food cravings, and I feel much more rested and relaxed all the time.

    1. Re:The real solution is solar time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting, but the name "solar time" is already used to mean mid-day at noon. You should call your time "sunrise time" if it puts sunrise at the same clock time (6am?) every day.

    2. Re:The real solution is solar time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point. I often lack the proper English words for the point I am trying to make.

      But yes, sunrise time can be arbitrarily chosen to be anything. It's just a variable in the math.

  48. Re:The very term Daylight Saving Time shows ignora by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Without DST, sunrise in New York City would happen at 4:29am on July 1st. So most people you know rise before 4:30am? Good for you, but for most people you don't know, sunlight between 4:30am and 5:30am would indeed be wasted if not saved by DST.

  49. Coordinated Universal Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it really that hard for stores - ect to change opening times?? that it matters which way the time is stabilized?? I vote to make US Standard time uniform at CST or Coordinated Universal Time. Then when we do things can be a local issue. The sun will still rise at the time it wants to regardless of what we call the time.

  50. Re:The very term Daylight Saving Time shows ignora by CrankyOldEngineer · · Score: 4, Informative

    You know the purpose of time zones is so that every area has solar noon at around noon on the clock (more or less). If you live in a northern latitude, you get more daylight in the summer, and less in the winter. Big deal. Most people I know get up around 5am, so yeah, if I lived in New York or Chicago, during a month per year the sun would rise before I did. Big f'ing deal. That's better than the semi-annual diruption.

    --
    COE
  51. Re:I was around when the USA did this, it was hell by Megane · · Score: 1

    This makes no sense since DST does not apply in winter.

    Did you miss the part where he said "the last time the USA got rid of daylight-savings time"? Apparently this was a "summer time year round" situation. I would have been a little kid on a 30-minute school bus ride at the time (rural school because living in a subdivision in the middle of nowhere), so that's probably why I don't remember it. I was in the middle of Central Time at the time, and ended up settling down around the same longitude in my adult life. But I did spend one year on the eastern side of Central Time, and holy crap the sun came up early. It may only have been half an hour, but I noticed it.

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  52. Re:The very term Daylight Saving Time shows ignora by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, the purpose of phones was to call somebody, so let's ditch all of the "smart" capabilities.

    Just because something was invented in some way doesn't mean that it can't be further improved with a redefinition.

  53. Re:The reason: Stores did not want to change signs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DST is great for me, I like long summer nights; but unlike other businesses, for the old drive-in movie theatres, DST wreaked havoc.

  54. Re:I was around when the USA did this, it was hell by quenda · · Score: 1

    This makes no sense since DST does not apply in winter.

    Did you miss the part where he said "the last time the USA got rid of daylight-savings time"?

    Nope.

    Apparently this was a "summer time year round" situation.

    Ah, I did miss that part. This would be the problem then, advancing the clock. No reason not to abolish DST.

  55. Old Native Wisdom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Only the government would believe that you could cut a foot off the top of a blanket, sew it to the bottom, and have a longer blanket."

  56. The further you are from the equator... by sandbagger · · Score: 1

    ...the less your opinion about daylight saving matters.

    People whose lives are comfortable blow minor things up so they have something to complain about. Taking advantage of as much daylight as we can is a good idea. These idiots will be the first to complain that it's dark in the winter.

    --
    ---- The above post was generated by the Turing Institute. Maybe.
  57. Why can't we just sync clocks the Sun continuously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From Jan - Jun daylight hours increase by about a minute a day. Then from July-Dec they decrease by about an hour a day.
    So why don't we just program the clocks to jump from 11:59 to 00:01 from Jan to Jun and hit 11:59 twice from July to Dec. Then the sleep disruption would be so gradual that it wouldn't matter.

  58. Re:I was around when the USA did this, it was hell by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0

    Rebels are rebels no matter where they come from. Be warned, we Americans will stomp the living shit out of you if you try anything. You're not going anywhere. We genocided the natives so you could immigrate there, we can wipe the slate again and replace you with new immigrants, no problem.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  59. Re:I was around when the USA did this, it was hell by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0

    Rebel territory. It doesn't matter which part of the US tries some shit. We'll fuck you up no matter where you are. One country, indivisible although I'm sure you missed that part of the Pledge because whatever America-hating school you went to skipped that. We're America, bitch, and we will burn down your cities and rape your women. Don't try anything, you're not going anywhere.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  60. Re:I was around when the USA did this, it was hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't understand why your feds get to say what timezone a State is in.

    Time-keeping affects interstate commerce, which is part of the federal government's perview.

  61. Re:I was around when the USA did this, it was hell by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

    Except that it's much simpler to change the clock than to change every schedule, or worse, only part of the schedules.

    Retail stores stay open later during the holiday shopping season, restaurants vary their hours during Friday/Saturday/Sunday, Walmart never closes, etc. It's not as if schedules are carved in stone. Around here, even the Target stores can't all agree on the same closing time.

    If you want to get up an hour earlier in the spring/summer, ask you boss to let you come in an hour earlier or become self employed. It's a little unreasonable to expect an entire country to fall in line because you think it's the only way to get your employer to let you shift your work schedule with the changing daylight.

    --

    ---
    DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
  62. Re:I was around when the USA did this, it was hell by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    I wonder if these people complaining about a 1-hour change never even cross the country.

    A real good chance they are retired and living in the south, where the daylight/Dark cycle is less variable. Some of them are so localized they don't even want time zones, only the time where they happen to reside. That sounds like a strawman, but I've had arguments with the selfsame people in here.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  63. Re:I get that switching times twice a year is bad. by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

    ... but there are quite proven medical benefits to having at least some amount of exposure to sunlight early in the day....

    I'm in Florida and we have too much fucking sun here. If I didn't have responsibilities which require me to be awake during normal human hours, I'd be nocturnal because the only time this place is actually habitable during the summer, is at night.

    Not only would I love to see DST abolished, but if Elon Musk could put a bunch of tinfoil in space or something to block out some of the sun over Florida, that would be great.

    --

    ---
    DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
  64. Re:I was around when the USA did this, it was hell by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    Sounds like BREXIT.
    Good luck!

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  65. I Don't Understand by kackle · · Score: 1

    Why can those entities who fear the dark set their own starting/ending hours to whatever they'd like? Why does everyone, forever, have to mess with their clocks and sleeping habits twice a year? This is wasteful of human time, and (if sleep is so important) can't be good for our health.

  66. Re:The very term Daylight Saving Time shows ignora by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    And most people I know get up around 9AM ... not sure what you actually want to say.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  67. Would be funny if... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

    ... daylight saving time becomes a bigger political issue than, say, proper healthcare for Americans.

    1. Re:Would be funny if... by drainbramage · · Score: 1

      It seems the washington legislature is packed...
      With comedians, or something like that.
      I figure they will find a compromise and move the clock 47 minutes.

      --
      No brain, no pain.
  68. Like Clockwork by edbob · · Score: 2

    This issue comes up twice a year, every year, then disappears just as quickly as the sun sets on an arctic day in December. Until there is concerted year-round pressure on congress to change it, this issue will continue to come up twice a year every year.

  69. Screw the Feds by HangingChad · · Score: 1

    What are they going to do, roll tanks across the border of states that dare defy the time change?

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  70. People are such wimps nowadays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DST has never bothered me in the least. You get up 10 minutes earlier each day for the week before, and snap, you're instantly adjusted.

    I love DST. I can't understand how and why the US suddenly has become a nation of wusses.

    1. Re: People are such wimps nowadays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That doesn't work for most people. I struggle to maintain my sleep schedule because assholes demand that everything be open during the day when I'm supposed to be asleep.

      My body is more of less opposite of most people in that I'm supposed to go to sleep in the morning and and up in the evening.

  71. Re:The very term Daylight Saving Time shows ignora by asylumx · · Score: 1

    DST is almost exactly opposite the school year. School runs through the winter, usually starting late august and ending June. DST runs through the summer, starting in early March and ending in early November. It doesn't coincide at all, unless you are confused and think that winter is when we enter DST...?

  72. RENAME IT: Nazi Time. by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    Maybe people will be willing to lift a finger to kill Nazi time. I'm speaking of course for other countries and post Trump USA...

    It's a German WAR TIME creation to save fuel. It's actually WW1 when nobody had electric light; but people objecting to calling it Nazi time would have educate others just how even more pointlessly stupid it is for us to have War Time.

  73. Meet me half way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not just split the difference and permanently move clocks 1/2 hour forwards/backwards during one of these cycles?

  74. Hooray For "Haters" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love how impartial the headline is. Nothing like supporting your agenda by establishing contrarians as haters right from the get go.

    But, put me in the haters camp. I fucking hate DST and definitely want it abolished.

    Time needs to be anchored to the position of the sun. Noon is when the sun is directly overhead. I'm OK with maintaining it regionally(timezones). Anything else is utter horseshit furthered by morons.

  75. I like it but... by cnaumann · · Score: 1

    The switch to DST should be only be in the summer months. Start late May, wrap it up by early August. It is fully light early in the morning, most folks will have been up for hours, and it makes sense to get on with the day.

  76. Re:I get that switching times twice a year is bad. by mark-t · · Score: 1

    I'm in Florida and we have too much fucking sun here.

    I empathize with you, seriously, but the problem I mentioned becomes quite serious the further north you go. I can imagine that in the southern states, such as Florida, this is less of an issue because the difference in the amount of daylight received between summer and winter is not as wide as it is once you start going further north. Basically, anything north of about the 45th parallel is going to start to experience problems with the sun rising too late in the day in the winter if DST is adopted year 'round. Not to mention the fact that in the middle of summer, especially as you go even further north, the sun is already setting very late. Does anyone really *NEED* the sun to still be up at 10:30pm, for example? Again, the closer you get to the equator, the less likely this is to be an issue, but Washington state is certainly far enough north to be impacted by this. Also, there's Canada, which would have significant economic incentive to follow suit, and would experience the effects even worse.

    While the problems that DST creates with the adjustment of sleep schedules are severe,they are at least relatively shortlived... tending to take no more than a few days to typically resolve, particularly if one makes an concerted effort by perhaps going to bed slightly earlier the next night to give their body as much as maybe an extra 15 to 30 minutes to make up for the lack of sleep the previous night. The effects of insufficient sunlight exposure in the morning is by comparison far more subtle, but the effects are also going to also be far more long lasting. Exposure to sunlight increases seratonin levels, which in turn will boost melatonin production later in the day, both of which are extremely important in regulating a healthy sleep cycle. If you delay the production of serotonin until late in the day, then melatonin production is similarly delayed. Now imagine instead of not getting a good night's sleep for only one night, and needing perhaps as much as maybe a week to recover from it, you extend that by not getting a good night's sleep for several weeks on end. You wouldn't get the sudden trauma at all by keeping the clocks further ahead like you do with the semi-annual DST one-hour shift, but you'd still get the effects of people not getting a decent night's sleep for many weeks until the sun started coming up earlier again.

    I am 100% in favor of abolishing DST, but I am categorically against keeping the clocks pushed ahead even during the winter.

  77. Re:I was around when the USA did this, it was hell by HiThere · · Score: 1

    But the railroads are less politically powerful than they used to be, and the airlines all schedule via computer, so they can adapt with minimal problems. (Probably less that an MSWindows update.)

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  78. Re:I get that switching times twice a year is bad. by HiThere · · Score: 1

    Yes, but that would better be accomplished when the sun is actually up. So schedule an appropriate recess, or PE period. And the timing of that could be adjusted for local conditions.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  79. Re:The reason: Stores did not want to change signs by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    The original reason for DST: Stores and parks did not want to change the signs that said when they would open, but they wanted to be open during daylight.

    I understand, but again, it's just not a good enough reason to engage in this ridiculous clock-changing ritual.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  80. Re:The very term Daylight Saving Time shows ignora by HiThere · · Score: 1

    Actually, I ended up with a smart phone because I was in a hurry, and didn't have time to shop. I find it much worse as a phone than my prior phone, which was designed as a phone. The address book is useful, and the clock, i.e., appointment reminder is useful. The rest....no.

    Next time I'm going to (attempt to) ensure I have time to get something that's better as a phone, and forget this idiocy of having it also be a camera and pocket computer. The screens too small for the second function, and a larger screen would make it less portable. And I *FAR* prefer a real keyboard.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  81. We in the North don't care by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    I don't anybody up North who likes DST. I live above 45.

    It is nice for a short while in the winter but the impact of being north is so great that it quickly means NOTHING to get that hour... it's dark again. Plus where I am we have clouds 2/3 of the year anyhow and so much light pollution that it's never really dark anyhow.

    The UV we need for our Vit D doesn't happen even at noon this far north because at that angle the UV bounces off the atmosphere. For the transition months the only UV exposure time is around noon and we will never learn to have large lunch breaks like other cultures...

    The holistic solution would be to limit everybody to 30 hours per week per job at full time pay. Then people have more day light. Holidays no longer become huge sales days because the economy will boom all the time instead of just a few times when people have vacation. Kids will have parents again...(2 alternating shifts = 1 full parent.) Robots won't take up as many jobs as quickly... and we'll be closer to the future predicted 50+ years ago where technology actually made our lives better.
    No this won't happen because productivity gains are forbidden to be felt by anybody but the owners (and those laid off.)

    1. Re: We in the North don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And your housing still would not be affordable

  82. Re:I was around when the USA did this, it was hell by sheetsda · · Score: 1

    Children went to school in pitch darkness and bitter cold, and people drove to work in the dark.

    So change the times those things happen and leave the rest of us and our clocks alone.

  83. How would this change affect existing software? by risc8088 · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't dropping DST for a specific area break a lot of existing code?

    1. Re:How would this change affect existing software? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most programs shouldn't be handling time directly. Doing so is a mess and full of traps for people who don't know what they are doing. No, you should be asking your OS or standard library what time it is and believing it. There is literally no change required for anybody after updating your OS's TZ database the way you install any other update. What changes, if any, shouldn't affect anything in your programs or code, as long as your end-user time zone is set correctly.

  84. Only a White Man ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As the old Indian said:

    Only a White Man would believe that cutting a foot off the top of a blanket and sewing it on the bottom would make the blanket any longer ...

  85. inability to grasp the margin by epine · · Score: 1

    Changing the clocks twice a year impacts the body's natural rhythms and is associated with a spike in heart attacks, strokes, and traffic collisions each year, according to the Washington State Department of Health's impact review.

    All the evidence I've seen on time-change related effects suggests that none of these effects are on the margin, viewed in annual aggregate. This is like banning the straw toss in Saudi Arabia, because every fistful of straw lofted into the air kills six camels (these are not healthy camels, destined to survive another month).

    If we implemented the time change as six steps of ten minutes over a week, the spike almost certainly vanishes.

    Now that 70% of the population—and nearly 100% of people under the age of forty—get their primary time signals from cellphone towers, a progressive regime could be implemented with little difficulty. So let's get rid of the thing because the implementation of the thing poses annoying problems. Not always a bad line of reasoning, but let's be honest about what this actually is: hardly anyone who is getting anywhere near the recommended level of sleep has a heart attack over rising an hour earlier than normal.

    We carry canaries into a coal mine precisely because they're good at croaking under the least duress.

    I've always viewed this kind of ridiculous medical argumentation as the tagline in a Save the Canaries campaign—probably sponsored by the paramedical profession—who really don't like getting up an hour earlier than normal on the busiest day of the year.

    [*] medical profession : paramedical profession :: mariner : submariner

  86. Re:I was around when the USA did this, it was hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your impotent threats scare nobody, faggot lol.

  87. An old indian saying by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    Don't know or care if it is true...but... "Only white man could cut bottom off blanket, sew it on top and think he have longer blanket". This "daylight savings time" idea is something that needs to go away. Before 24/7 connectivity and what not, when people (and businesses) wanted more time AFTER work, to do things, it was ok. But, it's time to shelve DST.

  88. Re: The reason: Stores did not want to change sign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not true at all! DST was invented by Benjamin Franklin. To sell more candles.

  89. Re:I was around when the USA did this, it was hell by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    It was total hell. Children went to school in pitch darkness and bitter cold, and people drove to work in the dark. I can't imagine who would want this again.

    Ready everyone? One. Two. Three.: "awwwwww"

    Please let me drive to work in the dark, fuck driving anytime the sun is close to the horizon. It's dangerous.

  90. Extended daylight? Shifted daylight! by NdotNdot · · Score: 1

    Funny how all the advertisers of abolishing DST praise the extended daylight in the evening and don't mention the reduced daylight in the morning! Ask people in the street and they will agree that summertime is great, wintertime is dull, so let's abolish wintertime and go for summertime all year round! What is not mentioned often is the fact that the total hours of sunshine is fixed and quite limited in the winter when you live in the north.

    Personally, I'm all for abolishing the switching back and forth, but living at a latitude with 8 hours sunshine in the winter and 16 hours in the summer, I must say that I would really hate sunrise at 9:00 am in the winter. So I would rather keep the current standard time and drop the shift in the summer. That, however would mean that nobody gains light in the evening, but instead looses the long, bright evenings in the summer in trade for a ridiculously early sunrise at 4am.

    Ultimately, one should not forget that living up north, the lengths of the days changes dramatically through the year and DST has the important effect of reducing the overall fluctuation of the sunrise, which is quite critical in our modern world where the time for getting up in the morning is mostly dictated by the clock.

  91. Re:The very term Daylight Saving Time shows ignora by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Only an ignorant Congressman who has never seen a sunrise could possibly call it Daylight *Saving* Time.

    Actually you can thank an entomologist from New Zealand for the definition, and then thank god that your "ignorant" congressmen don't make up new words for existing defined concepts further causing confusion all to pander to a few Cranky Old Pedants.

    any school district that wanted to could simply change their hours. Then nearly everyone could get the schedule that they want.

    You say you're a cranky old engineer but apparently you think that everyone in the country is a school student. Curios. A tad "ignorant" making your post ironic. But more than anything curious.

  92. Observing the real sun time can be profitable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some outside workers shifts start at 4:30 AM during summer in the mid Atlantic to take advantage of improved productivity in the cool mornings. During winter the shifts swings to 7:00AM.
    The Boss will likely allow this if someone does the cost benefit analysis.

  93. I hope that when DST ends... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope that when DST ends, we can finally have a conversation about the hours we send children to schools. Rather than the current state of acting like it is easier to change WHAT TIME IT IS, EVERYWHERE, than it is to adjust a school schedule

  94. Re: The reason: Stores did not want to change sign by LaughingRadish · · Score: 1

    Last time I checked, it was because he thought it was funny and didn't seriously think anyone would try it.

  95. Okay, but not quite good. by LaughingRadish · · Score: 1

    First off, kudos for taking a serious effort against time-switching. Bad idea though to go for DST year round. Just go back to standard time year round. Why? 1) It's astronomically (literally astronomically) stupid to define 12pm as one hour past when the sun is at its highest point in the day. 2) Doing this requires permission from the US Congress. A state can unilaterally shift to standard time year round.

  96. Re:I was around when the USA did this, it was hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems standard practice in America to refer to DST as "standard", which always makes these articles confusing for everyone else.

  97. Re:The reason: Stores did not want to change signs by blindseer · · Score: 1

    The public rifle range near me has a sign saying they close at sunset. I don't recall when it opens.

    --
    I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
  98. UTC forever by Gim+Tom · · Score: 1

    Let's forget DST and the the time zone stuff and just make UTC universal for the whole country! ;-)

  99. split the difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so shift the time permanently by half-an-hour and split the difference

  100. Re:I was around when the USA did this, it was hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing in the laws prevents schools, businesses, or anyone else from changing their hours. If they want to keep their schedules aligned with the sun, they are free to do it. If that really makes a difference to what they do, they might find that changing a dozen or two minutes two to four times near the equinoxes gives better results than changing by an hour twice a year. The rate of change of the day's length is greatest near the equinoxes.

  101. Re:The reason: Stores did not want to change signs by Alypius · · Score: 1

    Mine opens at 9 (10 on Sundays) to keep good relations with the neighbors.

  102. Mountain Time, not Daylight Savings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's boil this down to what it truly is. They don't want to keep daylight savings time. They want to switch from Pacific time to Mountain time, even though they live on the Pacific coast.

    And now we can see just how ridiculous this idea is. Let's put Colorado on Central Time, Oklahoma on Eastern Time, and Florida on Atlantic Time. Mind blown.

    This is about as pointless as Trump's postcard-sized 1040. (They didn't actually simplify your taxes. They merely rearranged the deck chairs.)

  103. Requires farmers to what now? by sabbede · · Score: 1

    So far as I know, DST is and adjustment made FOR farmers, not one that requires "farmers to make needless adjustments".

  104. Two alternative solutions by turp182 · · Score: 1

    The Monthly Approach

    Change the time 10 minutes every month, forward or backward as needed.

    The Daily Approach

    Change the time by about 20 seconds per day and then fix things up on New Year's Eve/Day.

    This would be a boon to employment as manufacturers of anything with a clock would need to add wifi or some tech to get the nuclear time, or add +20/-20 second buttons to their devices. It's a win for the economy and an easy change to handle with regards to sleep patterns.

    --
    BlameBillCosby.com
  105. Re:I get that switching times twice a year is bad. by mark-t · · Score: 1

    Or... you could admit that we shouldn't be trying to force that kind of asinine attitude on our bodies in the first place, and forcing everyone to not have any morning sunlight just because some people think that having more sunlight in the evening is better. But evolution is not a democracy. Regardless of what people *think* might somehow be subjectively "better", we are biologically adapted to function at our best during the daytime, and depriving people of morning sunlight in exchange for more evening sunlight is a vain proposal that gives precisely zero thought to the measurable impacts that it would have on physical health of absolutely everyone during the winter.

    I get that some people already have to be at work really early and don't get any sunlight during their morning commute already during the months of December and January, but pushing DST year-round will force those effects upon a *FAR* larger segment of the population. Instead of just one or two days of increased accidents right after an abrupt semi-annual time change, with the clocks permanently pushed an hour ahead you will instead get a slow ramping up of accidents associated with a lack of restful sleep as you get into late November and December (quite distinctly larger than the effects you already get associated with poorer road conditions), which will peak towards the end of the year, and then slowly ramp back down in January and early February as the sun starts to rise earlier and earlier again. "Recess" isn't going to fix that.

  106. Headline fail by klossner · · Score: 1

    The headline is backward. The vote in the Washington State legislature was to go on daylight saving time year-round. They wouldn't need federal approval to go on standard time year-round.