Slashdot Mirror
Tim Berners-Lee Says World Wide Web Must Emerge From 'Adolescence' (venturebeat.com)
The fraying World Wide Web needs to rediscover its strengths and grow into maturity, its designer Tim Berners-Lee said on Monday, marking the 30th anniversary of the collaborative software project his supervisor initially dubbed "vague but exciting." From a report: Speaking to reporters at CERN, the physics research center outside Geneva where he invented the web, Berners-Lee said users of the web had found it "not so pretty" recently. "They are all stepping back, suddenly horrified after the Trump and Brexit elections, realizing that this web thing that they thought was that cool is actually not necessarily serving humanity very well," he said. "It seems we don't finish reeling from one privacy disaster before moving onto the next one," he added, citing concerns about whether social networks were supporting democracy. People who had grown up taking the internet's neutrality for granted now found that the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump had "rolled that back."
needs to do it first....
The results of elections didn't go the way the permanent state/globalists/monied elite wanted, so there fore we have to STOP EVERYTHING. IT"S THE WORST DISASTER EVER.
Listen, these elections are what you get instead of violent revolution. Keep chipping away at the values of the enlightenment and you won't like the result.
If there's something particularly chilling, technologists thinking their task is to "solve" politics is pretty high on the list. (Among politicians and politically motivated public commentators the parallel approach is to claim their political stance is pure scientific truth without a whiff of political stance.) My personal take on such approaches is that the cure may be more dangerous than the problem that has been framed to be the problem.
Politics is politics. There are no solutions that turn it into something else. Or at least solutions that would really fix it, but there are plenty of "solutions" which break things that actually work as a side effect, while mostly replacing the problem with another, trendier problem...
voted for the politics they wanted and for the UK to exit the EU.
Humanity enjoys the freedom to vote.
Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
Power brokers and the "learned scholars" seem to always think the system is broken when normal people get more information and then don't bend to their will. Maybe the solution you envision from your ivory tower surrounded by your walled gardens isn't the world we want to live in.
Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
Berners-Lee is so fully disconnected from reality now that he's no longer credible. He talks about the Web "saving humanity", yet he has personally participated in crafting standards for it that serve corporate interests rather than the rest of us. Under his "guidance", the Web has transitioned from a network where people participated in its development and had control over how they consumed it to one where they no longer participate, have no control, and have become passive consumers. Corporate Web developers now view their target "useless eater" audiences with the same disregard as eugenicists of the last century.
He's lamenting his own utter failure to guide his own creation in the way that he claims he really wanted it to progress, while doing the precise opposite? What a bloody hypocrite.
People who had grown up taking the internet's neutrality for granted now found that the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump had "rolled that back."
What the hell does that mean? Are they talking about packet prioritization, viewpoint neutrality, trolling, hacking... The Trump administration "rolled back" network neutrality rules that had existed for roughly a year.
TBL is not the old man yelling at the cloud. He's a highly intelligent person who cannot believe, with all this internet-provided freedom of information, people still make such ignorant decisions. Common failure of the reasonably well educated.
Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.
Ernest Hemingway
Democracy needs an informed population to work.
That is correct, and in why only in recent years has it really started to work.
People trying to subvert democracy often attack it by misinforming the population
Indeed that has been happening for a few decades now by a central core of media that withhold and shape information.
in the last few years by convincing people that everything is fake and a lie
And how did they do that? By in fact showing people directly, what were fakes and lies.
simply choosing their own preferred truth is a valid choice.
That's the thing though. Now anyone can really get the whole picture. They can see the actual video of what people did, and judge them on that instead of what the media claims they said or did.
People complain that Trump voters ignore the "Truth" that Trump is whatever - racist, homophobic, etc. The reason Trump never has much impact from those claims, is because for the first time you can really see the falseness of them - you can see how Trump behaves now and in the past around women, around people of color, even around supporting gay marriage.
Trump is unique compared to a lot of current politicians in that there is a lot of prior video of him and so people already had a sense of him before the media started trying to craft an alternative image.
But going forward, more and more politicians will have the same thing apply - people will judge them based on what they have actually said and done instead of what the media claims about them. You can even see that with newer politicians like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez - she gets a lot of flak from the right, but you can watch a lot of video from her that is fairly reasonable, so the calls that she is crazy do not really stick.
She has some ideas about socialism that I and others find wrong, but you can actually go see what she says and judger her based on that instead of by what others sat about her. So how is any of that a "lie"? People can be better informed now that at any point in history - the real problem is that the professional political class by and large suck giant donkey balls, and now that is easy for anyone to see. In the end that is not a "problem" at all, that is a solution and the world is undergoing a correction based on this new fact...
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
You'll have to enlighten me. How has the EU been punishing the UK? From where I stand it looks more like a whiny cunt trying to leave the club whilst stilling having access to the equipment and the cheap members bar.
If the EU wanted to make it hard they would just say 'you're out, you get nothing, all treaties are void, goodbye'.
The trouble with Brexit is that no-one who supports it actually has a realistic plan or even an inkling of what's involved. Not that that stops them moaning about how everyone's against them (I wonder why)
We need a new internet because there were some election results he didn't like? Seriously?
Nice how you slipped that "impeach Trump for nothing" bit in there. Obstruction of justice isn't nothing. Neither are illegal campaign contributions to shut up former lovers. If it were nothing, why all the lying and obstruction - which, basically, is what led to the Mueller investigation in the first place. The FBI was investigating Russian interference (which happened, and needed to be ferreted out) - having nothing to do with impeachment (unless, of course, they were in cahoots with the campaign). But Trump fired Comey, specifically (if his own statements can be believed - but then, isn't that kind of the point) to shut down that investigation, which rang all the obstruction alarm bells.
Now it's quite possible that all of the obstruction and lying were merely Trump's attempts to preserve his pretenses of having won in a huge landslide, that he's a self-made billionaire, that he knows anything about anything... I'll grant you that. His narcissism and lying are that basic to his personality - and his actions may well have had nothing to do with attempts to cover up a Russia connection. But faced with all kinds of incriminating facts, should the DOJ just do nothing - because you say it's nothing? Clinton was impeached (wrongly, of course) for a consensual blowjob or two, and Trump's blown past that 'standard' a hundred times over...
Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
I don't want to blow up the system. I want to save the system by stopping a foreign invasion of people who don't share American values and are at best indifferent and at worst openly hostile to the people living here. I think the people trying to flood the country with foreigners are the ones trying to "blow up the system."
We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.