Slashdot Mirror


Scientists Reawaken Cells From a 28,000-Year-Old Mammoth (vice.com)

Cells from a woolly mammoth that died more than 28,000 years ago have been partially reactivated inside of mouse egg cells, according to a study published Monday in Scientific Reports. "The achievement shows that biological activity can be induced in the cells of long-dead creatures, but that does not mean that scientists will be resurrecting extinct animals like mammoths any time soon," reports Motherboard. From the report: A team led by Kazuo Yamagata, a biologist at Kindai University in Japan, extracted cells from the remains of "Yuka," a young female mammoth discovered in 2010 on the coast of the Dmitry Laptev Strait in the Russian Far East. Yuka was entombed in permafrost, a frozen ground layer that can often keep the skin, fur, brains, and other softer tissues of dead animals intact. Because Yuka is in particularly great condition, Yamagata's team was able to extract 88 nucleus-like structures from her preserved muscle tissues. The mammoth cells were implanted into mouse oocytes, which are ovarian cells involved in embryonic development. The researchers also implanted elephant cells into mouse eggs to provide a control sample.

Once the cell nuclei were incubated, they seemed to reawaken -- but only slightly. The cells did not divide, but completed some steps that precede cell division. For instance, the mammoth nuclei performed a process called "spindle assembly," which ensures that chromosomes are correctly attached to microscopic spindle structures before a parent cell breaks into two daughter cells. The fact that Yuka's cells were able to spring back into partial action is both an exciting and challenging development for scientists interested in cloning extinct animals. On one hand, some degree of cellular reactivation is clearly possible. But Yuka is also an exceptionally pristine specimen, and even her cells were not able to complete cell division -- a major hurdle that scientists must clear to accomplish de-extinction.

82 comments

  1. Fortune Favors the Bold by Kunedog · · Score: 3, Funny

    Next Step: Mouse pregnant with mammoth embryo.

    1. Re: Fortune Favors the Bold by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's nice. Don't touch the mouse! We making an alien sequel

    2. Re:Fortune Favors the Bold by Brooklynoid · · Score: 2

      I hope they're planning on a C-section for Mama Mouse.

    3. Re:Fortune Favors the Bold by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

      Next Step: Mouse pregnant with mammoth embryo.

      That will be awkward when the baby Mammoth is born and opens its eyes for the first time seeing it's stretched out momma and gets imprinted.

      Mammoth will think it's a mouse and try mating with mice when it grows up. Hopefully the Mammoth is a girl, because I don't think a mammoth penis will fit in a female mouse.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    4. Re:Fortune Favors the Bold by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Congrats! It's a mamouse.

    5. Re:Fortune Favors the Bold by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but it could be a long way to get there. Right now, it could complete just Prophase. They will have to figure out what triggers the cell to progress to the next phase (Prometaphase).

    6. Re:Fortune Favors the Bold by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is not at all how imprinting works. Ducklings imprinted with humans don't try to mate with them after maturity. Imprinting is a baby behavior only.

    7. Re:Fortune Favors the Bold by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mammoths are related to elephants. Elephants are deathly afraid of mice. We can infer that mammoths are probably afraid of mice as well. Now we are genetically creating behemoth scared of itself. There must some government funding of this.

    8. Re: Fortune Favors the Bold by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Impregnate it with a shitty smelly parasite hindu-chimp, that will be a real illegal alien sequel.

    9. Re:Fortune Favors the Bold by mysticgoat · · Score: 2

      Dr Foglio and the Girl Genius say that the result would be a "mimoth".

    10. Re:Fortune Favors the Bold by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Phil and Dixie?

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    11. Re: Fortune Favors the Bold by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      They're playing with fire, I tell you. Seen Legend?? That's nothing; imagine the Earth overrun with mice... with the strength of mammoths!

    12. Re:Fortune Favors the Bold by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mammoth will think it's a mouse and try mating with mice when it grows up.

      It can be done, but it takes a lot of patience and a lot of saliva.

  2. I for one.. by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 0

    Welcome out new Wooly Mammoth Mouse overlords.
    #obligatory

    1. Re:I for one.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you'll find that they're called Mimmoths

    2. Re:I for one.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard they're "hung like a mouse"!

    3. Re:I for one.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no, you've got it all wrong, this will be a mammoth-sized mouse with mammoth-like features. A Mammouse.

    4. Re:I for one.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can we implant a laser?

  3. Jurassic Park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coming Soon

    1. Re:Jurassic Park by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No it is Holocene Park.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  4. Dr Ian Malcolm said it best by CeasedCaring · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should..."

    1. Re:Dr Ian Malcolm said it best by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      He also said a lot of other things.
      "You will fail because chaos"
      - "I don't get..."
      "CHAOS! Oh and also hubris"
      Certainly one of the more insufferable characters in movie history (and not at all like the guy in the book)

      And in this case, of course they should. Whether they should proceed to build an ill-conceived (and rather lame) theme park with extinct animals is another matter.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    2. Re:Dr Ian Malcolm said it best by jabuzz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If they had just built a reinforced concrete wall to separate the zones of the park and put the ride a top it on a monorail there would have been no issue.

    3. Re:Dr Ian Malcolm said it best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      If they had just built a reinforced concrete wall to separate the zones of the park ...

      But the Dems didn't want that.

      Captcha: bribed

    4. Re:Dr Ian Malcolm said it best by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      Certainly one of the more insufferable characters in movie history (and not at all like the guy in the book)

      Let's not forget David Levinson from Independence Day.

    5. Re:Dr Ian Malcolm said it best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Robocop said it best: "dead or alive, you're coming with me."

      Just kidding, it was actually Bon Scott, with "Ain't no fun waitin' around to be a millionaire."

    6. Re: Dr Ian Malcolm said it best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Don't you pick on my boy like that. None of you would be here of it weren't for him. You knew. Back in the 60s. You knew then this was possible.

    7. Re:Dr Ian Malcolm said it best by jellomizer · · Score: 2

      In many ways we have been brainwashed into the Warning from Science Fiction, where we relate the experiments to the dystopia that causes many Science Fiction stories.
      Genetic Engineering in Science Fiction will lead to monsters, plagues, and KAHNNN!!! KAhnnn!! Kahnn! ann n. Cloning creates doppelgangers, and species of animals that seem well adapted to an environment that is much different to what they were evolved for. AI will always deem mankind is unnecessary and should be destroyed...

      Real science is much more dull. As well most scientists goal is is get published, so they will have to go under peer review, including ethical review.
      Just recently the Chinese Scientist who Genetically modified a human baby with HIV resistance who is being born from a mother with HIV, was in essence ousted from the scientific community, for ethics violations.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    8. Re:Dr Ian Malcolm said it best by meta-monkey · · Score: 2

      And in this case, of course they should.

      You say that now, but wait until you're getting eaten alive by a genetically engineered mammoth.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    9. Re:Dr Ian Malcolm said it best by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Those stories are how we process our possible future well in advance. The reason the dystopias never come to pass is specifically because everything has been explored far in advance by fiction. If you think Asimov's fictional 3 laws had no influence on Tesla's pseudo-self-driving cars, you're ignoring a lot.

    10. Re:Dr Ian Malcolm said it best by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      "Life, uh... finds a way." - Dr. Ian Malcolm

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    11. Re:Dr Ian Malcolm said it best by Diakoneo · · Score: 1

      “Oh, yeah. Oooh, ahhh, that’s how it always starts. Then later there’s running and screaming.”

      --
      "Just as there is nothing so unreal as reality TV, there is nothing as unsocial as social media." - Alistair Dabbs
    12. Re:Dr Ian Malcolm said it best by jabuzz · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I don't think a herbivore is likely to eat a human. On the other hand you might get trampled by them.

  5. Life & cells is just chemistry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no "quickening" or whatever. If the portion of the cell which are involved in division are intact and implemented in an a new environment with sufficient element and energy, it will happily do its reaction. The surprise is not that it happens. the surprise is that they managed to find part of the cell sufficiently intact for that to even be possible after so much time.

    1. Re: Life & cells is just chemistry by mrbester · · Score: 2

      > there is no "quickening"...

      Juan Villa-Lobosh Ramireszh would dishagree.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
  6. I'm going to sleep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can reawaken me after 28000 years.

    1. Re:I'm going to sleep by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      You can reawaken me after 28000 years.

      You think 28,000 years is long enough- but when you awake they'll still be singing "baby shark" and you'll immediately go back to sleep again.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    2. Re:I'm going to sleep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Baby mammoth, do-do-do. Baby mammoth, do-do-do.

  7. Start taking samples now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I honestly don't know why we aren't already "manufacturing" endangered species. We have the technology to do so, but lack the political will to even think about undoing some of the damage we are doing to the global ecosystem.

    I realize this is a bandaid and not a cure. But, it's better than allowing ourselves to force so many species into extinction because we can't control our impulses or greed.

    1. Re:Start taking samples now by DarkOx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Probably because just cranking out endangered species would not really solve the problem. Most of them are endangered due to habitat destruction. Yes there are some exceptions like Wolves in North America where over hunting is to blame. There would be no point for example in release a bunch of endangered cats in Asia with no way for them to eek out a living.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    2. Re:Start taking samples now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I honestly don't know why we aren't already "manufacturing" endangered species.

      Because it is expensive. Do you volunteer to fund it?

    3. Re:Start taking samples now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *eke

      "Eek" is the noise you make whan the animal surprises you. "Eke" is the verb meaning to stretch your supply of something out by using it frugally.

      Captain Dictionary

    4. Re:Start taking samples now by omnichad · · Score: 1

      These cats are frightening.

    5. Re:Start taking samples now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Queue DarkOx's response that he (or she) could care less, in 3... 2... 1....

      Preemptive "whoosh" for those who don't get it. It's cue and couldn't care less.

  8. Sorry, no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A woolly mammoth the size of a mouse does not impress me.

    1. Re:Sorry, no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it will. Unless you're anti-science.

    2. Re:Sorry, no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about stonehenge the size of 18 inches?

    3. Re:Sorry, no by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      It would impress me, but far less than the mouse who can give birth to a woolly mammoth!

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    4. Re:Sorry, no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about one the size of a guinea pig?

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rock_hyrax

  9. zombie mammoth apocalypse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    will make for a pretty good zombie movie!

  10. Can they reawaken cells from a corrupt spreadsheet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not even that old, just before W2K...

  11. It Begins by Only+Time+Will+Tell · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maiya looked out wistfully over the horizon at the valley below. She leaned heavily on her walking stick carved from a mammoth shin bone and pulled back her sabertoothed tiger cowl. What changes this valley had seen over the past few decades. A few paces back, her son finally caught up with her and joined her in the view. "What was it like before they resurrected all the dinosaurs and ancient animals?" Maiya sighed heavily, eying the overgrowth that had swallowed a city that used to be called 'L.A.' She could hear in the distance the howls and screams of something fighting for its life. "Well, for one, we stepped in a lot less T-Rex shit."

  12. Cells have been reactivated inside of "mouse eggs" by grep+-v+'.*'+* · · Score: 1

    Cells from a woolly mammoth that died more than 28,000 years ago have been partially reactivated inside of mouse egg cells

    BRAINZZZZZ .... and cheese.

    So, errr, like, what do you use -- a mousetrap? A mammoth trap? And it kills them? But, but they're already dead.

    More like you'd get 'em more pissed than they were already. A mammoth-sized mouse is now upset with you. And here you thought your day was bad enough already.

    --
    If the universe is someone's simulation -- does that mean the stars are just stuck pixels?
  13. I can't wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mammoth jerky! I can almost taste it already!

  14. Uhmm ... I've seen this movie ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uhmm ... I've seen this movie ...

  15. Soon after: Jurassic Pork BBQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mmmm, pulled Mammoth Pork sandwiches.

  16. Reawakening or preserving by kalpol · · Score: 1

    It seems to me from this experiment they will learn a whole lot more about how to preserve cells for a long period of time than how to reawaken them.

    --
    12:50 - press return.
  17. A lot further than I expected. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All they would have to do is get one cell to work all the way thru and they are good. They should try using a cell from an elephant to do the implanting.

  18. Clearly what they need to do differently... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clearly what they need to do differently is to get rid of the mouse oocytes cells altogether. They have access to elephant oocyte cells. Put the mammoth's nucleus-like structures into elephant oocytes cells and see how far THAT goes.

    Mouse oocytes cells will be too different to get you very far. Think of the DNA as the compiled software and the rest of the cell as the hardware that runs that DNA software. There will be too many things already in the mouse cell cytoplasm optimized and set up for mouse DNA, mouse RMA, mouse messenger RMA (mmRMA? :-), mouse cell wall structures, and other mouse proteins in the cell already that just shoving in a mammoth nucleus isn't going to "just work", even if you somehow managed to "jumpstart" transcription and translation of the mammoth DNA. That software won't run very far on that hardware.

    >the mammoth nuclei performed a process called "spindle assembly," which ensures
    >that chromosomes are correctly attached to microscopic spindle structures before a
    >parent cell breaks into two daughter cells

    Right there you're going to have problems. Mouse cells have 40 chromosomes. Mammoth cells have 58. Just google "spindle assembly" and the first link is

    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096098221201189X

    which has enough details in the first paragraph to tell you that having the wrong number of chromosomes from what the rest of the cell expects is going to be a non-starter for cell division whether it is mitosis or meiosis.

    And, yeah, elephant cells (with 56 chromosomes) probably won't magically "just work" either, but they would be a better starting point for cell modifications to get to something that will work with the mammoth DNA. (My guess: get the oocyte to divide into an ovum and then mechanically move over the missing chromosome to the ovum's nucleus, and throw in a mammoth mitochondria, and (wave hands!) recalibrate everything for 56 chromosomes... then find some mammoth sperm that was well preserved.)

    I suspect they knew all along that this wasn't going to work and produce a mammoth, but they wanted to see how far it would work before something breaks, and mouse cell are very well understood in the biology world so finding the point of breakage and understanding what broke would be easier. Plus, doing the whole experiment all over a second time with elephant cells means a second publication with your name on it. :-)

  19. next step human... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once the technique is perfectioned, you will be able to get some little Einsteins and Hittlers walking around

  20. Only the young females ... by Laxator2 · · Score: 1

    ... get to be desirable, even when it comes to reviving mammoths. After all, what would be the point of reviving an old male ?

    1. Re:Only the young females ... by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      After all, what would be the point of reviving an old male ?

      More ivory ?

    2. Re:Only the young females ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After all, what would be the point of reviving an old male ?

      As an old male, it's nice to be 'revived' from time to time.

      More importantly, you do realize that a clone would start off as a ... young male.

    3. Re:Only the young females ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More importantly, you do realize that a clone would start off as a ... young male.

      Only the Male clones, not all the clones.

  21. Once this works, on to Neanderthals! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There have got to be one or two of the poor guys frozen in the tundra somewhere.

  22. And just like that... by Kinthelt · · Score: 1

    The mouse became scared of itself.

    --

    "Evil will always triumph over good, because good is dumb." - Dark Helmet (Spaceballs)

  23. Wooly Mouse Triple Penetration. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A trunk for every hole :)

    You know it is cumming.

  24. Re:Cells have been reactivated inside of "mouse eg by GungaDan · · Score: 1

    "A mammoth-sized mouse"

    The rodents of unusual size? I don't believe they exist.

    --
    Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
  25. The race is on by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Will the world end in Parasite Eve, Skynet, or Heavy Weather?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  26. News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I read this as

    Scientists awaken 28,000 year old cell phone!

    Bitterly disappointed,
    Penge

  27. Next steps by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Finally someone has made exciting advancements in the field. I propose we being to pool efforts to advance this quickly due to it's amazing medical applications. We can start by putting all the scientists in one major facility and managing them under a single Umbrella Corporation.

    1. Re:Next steps by es330td · · Score: 1

      Assuming you aren't joking, this is a terrible idea. In all fields, the universe progresses through competition. Always has, always will. Removing competition will only slow progress.

    2. Re:Next steps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Umbrella Corporation is a reference to the company in the Resident Evil line of games that created zombie creatures.

    3. Re:Next steps by es330td · · Score: 1

      My bad. Thanks for the clarification.

  28. Impossible? hurdles by alleycat0 · · Score: 2

    De-extinction is rife with seemingly intractable problems. Going to locate and clone a sufficient number of unique preserved specimens to avoid inbreeding? What about reproducing its entire exterior/interior microbiome - especially the essential gut flora?

    --
    I am not a number - I am a free man!
    1. Re:Impossible? hurdles by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      De-extinction is rife with seemingly intractable problems.

      ... most of which are ethical rather than about the possibility of the procedure.

      Going to locate and clone a sufficient number of unique preserved specimens to avoid inbreeding?

      If you've developed a technique, you will almost certainly already have tried a variety of samples from a variety of sources before you get one which works. So when you've found a solution that works, you try it on the previous samples which didn't work with different techniques. As long as you produce a second, preferably female, specimen before the first (also preferably female - you can probably do a parthenogenetic tweak with two females more easily than with two males) one dies, then you've got the basis of an expanding population. The amount of new genetic material you need to introduce into a small, significantly inbred population in order to forestall major problems is lower than people think. (Non-artificial reintroductions of predators in several locations have shown this, to some people's surprise.)

      What about reproducing its entire exterior/interior microbiome - especially the essential gut flora?

      That would almost certainly be desirable. Which is a different thing to necessary.

      Giving Specimen #1 and #2 gut flora from the closest living relative (probably the surrogate mother's species, even if you had to do a premature Caesarian before the infant killed the mother) would probably be a good enough start. Give #3 a gut flora from another relative then letting the three run together (and cross-contaminate ; alternatively, move fresh dung from one enclosure to another) would allow internal natural selection do what it's good at.

      But you've still got to recreate something resembling a working environment for them to live in. Otherwise it's a tour de force of genetics, good advertising, and fuck all good for the animals. Ethical problems.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  29. Unwise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am pretty sure this is how the cultists summoned Cthulhu.

  30. worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somebody must have got to it first, and stolen the ear bone that contains the viable cells.

  31. Cue the Jurassic Park Music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .....Only a matter of time

  32. awwww by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All I hear is Orangefansad