Slashdot Mirror


Volvo To Add In-Car Sensors To Prevent Drunk Driving (reuters.com)

Volvo is installing cameras and sensors in its cars from the early 2020s, monitoring drivers for signs of being drunk or distracted and intervening to prevent accidents. These new safety features come a couple weeks after the automaker announced it will limit the top speed to 112mph on all its new cars from 2020 to help reduce the number of accidents. Reuters reports: Head of R&D Henrik Green said cameras will be installed on all Volvo models built on its SPA2 platform for larger cars, starting from the XC90 SUV in the early part of the next decade, before being added to smaller cars built on its CMA platform. Volvo said intervention if the driver is found to be drunk, tired or distracted by checking a mobile phone - among the biggest factors in accidents - could involve limiting the car's speed, alerting the Volvo on Call assistance service, or slowing down and parking the car.

CEO Hakan Samuelsson said that while the strategies meant Volvo might lose some customers keen on high speeds, it also opened opportunities to win parents who wanted to buy the safest car to carry their children. "It would be easy to say that people can do whatever they like but we feel we have a responsibility to do this. Maybe people will see us as 'Big Brother,' but if we save some lives then it's worth it," he told journalists. Volvo also said it would introduce Care Key on cars from 2021, allowing buyers to set speed limits, and that it was talking to insurers to offer better terms for users of these safety features.

10 of 145 comments (clear)

  1. The More you add the more it fails by rtb61 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They have to be extremely careful adding this stuff to vehicles, when it fails, for what ever reason, it denies access to the vehicle by the owner. The more tech you add, the greater the servicing cost and the more frequent failures will be and the worse the reputation of the vehicle. You can add all the silly crap in you want to, inflate service and repair costs but there will be consequences. There a numerous studies on the more tech you add the more frequent failures become and the more frequent and costly servicing becomes (simply more stuff to fail and more stuff to service and more stuff to repair).

    You know where this is heading cars that refuse to move unless they get their authorised $2,500 service and that means towing costs on top, owners will be impressed (oh yeah, they are counting on the hugely inflated authorised only service costs, the more automation, the locked in your become).

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    1. Re:The More you add the more it fails by jawtheshark · · Score: 2
      They already do... in a sense. I have a 19 year old car that allows me everything. My wifes car (new from winter 2017), doesn't allow you to do a lot of things. Example: I can start my cars engine whenever I want, in gear (obviously not a good idea), out of gear, etc. My wifes car? Push the button (not a key. *sigh*) and it tells you "Please engage the brake before starting the engine". Why? I'm in neutral/park, there we're standing in our perfectly even garage. Why do I need to do this? Just start the engine as I told you.

      That's modern cars for you.

      Prohibiting you to drive because you are drunk/tired/distressed is just one step further.

      I will drive my old car until it literally starts to fall apart. The advantage of having it driven for 19 years is also that you know it inside out. You immediately know if something is off and needs to be repaired.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
  2. Re:Keen on high speeds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Traffic laws are not crimes
    I don't need a drivers license.
    I'm not driving I'm traveling.
    I'm an Article 4 free inhabitant.
    Where is the Corpus Delecti?

  3. Seems a no win here. by speedlaw · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you don't drink you won't want to pay for a needless in car breathalyzer....why would you ? If you do drink the last thing you want is your car to decide you have had 'too much', whatever that is. Can't see who, if anyone, is the audience here. While I loathe the right wing description of "virtue signaling" is that where Volvo is going ? Back when there were two swedish car companies, they used to say "one for the right lane (volvo) and one for the left lane (saab). Looks like the right lane is now a maiden aunt who reads Streetsblog and is writing letters against legal cannabis and about speeders on her block to the local legislators....

    1. Re:Seems a no win here. by ljw1004 · · Score: 2

      Can't see who, if anyone, is the audience here.

      I see clearly who the audience is...

      1. Add "big-brother" safety enforcements like 112mph speed caps and distracted-driver preventions
      2. Observe fewer car accidents that involve Volvo vehicles. Achieve their 2020 goal of "no deaths in a new volvo"
      3. Potential customers observe the safety statistics. They observe no deaths in a Volvo. For them, it becomes a no-brainer to buy a Volvo. PROFIT.

      I agree that by no means everyone will view "zero deaths" as a positive selling point. For a lot of people they'll ignore this feature. But I'm sure there will be a sizeable potential audience for whom it's a major selling point. Imagine you have kids, and you're having a conversation with your spouse about which new car to buy, and your spouse says "let's get a volvo because no one dies in a volvo" and you have to answer "well I'd rather get a car that looks better even though people do die in it". It'll be hard to get your way. Like a lot of people I was persuaded to get rid of my motorcycle when my kids were born, for similar reasons.

  4. Re:Keen on high speeds? by speedlaw · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The reason German cars are German Cars is due to the Autobahn. If a car is tight at 180 kph, it will be very good at 90 kph.

  5. Crash not accident by Whatsisname · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Volvo's technology is designed to reduce crashes. Not accidents.

    An accident is "an event that happens by chance or that is without apparent or deliberate cause."

    If someone is driving drunk, or driving distracted, and they crash, it's no accident. By defaulting to the term "accident", we are implicitly absolving drivers of heavy machines of their responsibility to operate them safely and competently.

    https://www.crashnotaccident.c...

  6. This could go wrong in many ways by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 2

    So what happens if the owner is injured and has no other way to get medical treatment other than to drive to a medical facility? If the car recognizes that the driver is not paying attention due to being in excruciating pain and pulls over and won't move, that's not good. Or if the driver is transporting an injured family member? I'm sure checking on the family member while driving could be seen as distracted too. There are so many ways this could go wrong.

  7. Parents by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    worried about their partying kids. And yeah, a lot of parents could give a crap if their 17 your old kid gets plastered because hey, they did to when they were that age, as long as they don't get an underage DUI.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  8. Re:Keen on high speeds? by eaglesrule · · Score: 2

    Bingo! I have a sovereign citizen bingo!