Slashdot Mirror


Global Box Office Flat in 2018, Netflix and Subscription Services Rise in Popularity (variety.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: The domestic box office rebounded in 2018 in a recovery fueled by blockbusters such as "Black Panther" and "Incredibles 2." Ticket sales in the U.S. climbed 7% to top out at a record $11.9 billion, according to a new report by the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA). That helped off-set declines in overseas markets in Europe and Latin America, pushing the global box office to $41.1 billion, a year-over-year improvement of a percentage point. The MPAA study is produced by the entertainment industry trade group and is intended to provide a comprehensive look at the overall state of the film business.

In addition to box office revenues, the report found that the global home entertainment business increased by 16% to reach $55.7 billion last year. This was driven primarily by the rise of digital rentals, sales, and subscriptions to streaming services such as Netflix. Digital home entertainment spending in the U.S. increased 24% to $17.5 billion; internationally this sector climbed 34% to $25.1 billion. That helped plug the gap left by massive declines in the sale and rental of DVDs and Blu-rays. In the U.S., disc sales dropped 15% to $5.8 billion and fell 14% internationally to $7.3 billion. Four years ago, physical sales in the U.S. were $10.3 billion and were $14.9 billion internationally, a sign of just how precipitously the DVD market has fallen. Over that same period, digital spending has increased 170% globally. Much of that rise is attributable to the popularity of Netflix, Amazon Prime, and other subscription services. Globally, the number of digital subscriptions increased by 27% to 613.3 million. Online video subscriptions surpassed cable for the first time in 2018. Cable subscriptions fell 2% to 556 million.

53 comments

  1. Rise in Home Theater by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My home theater is still on par with movie theaters, with the exception of the size of the screen, which doesn't dominate my living room. Surround, Balanced, dark, with real popcorn butter. Add in, I can pause the film being played to .... get more popcorn, and it is a win.

    The point being, there is very little value added to spending $15 ticket to see a movie, in a crowded theater. Add in the $6 soda and $10 Bucket of Popcorn. I'd rather spend that kind of dough on a nice couple NY steaks, or even Filet and have a great meal and a movie at home, relaxed, in my PJs.

    Tell me again why I should go to the theater?

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    1. Re:Rise in Home Theater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      public sex with a stranger?

    2. Re:Rise in Home Theater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      My home theater is still on par with movie theaters, with the exception of the size of the screen, which doesn't dominate my living room. Surround, Balanced, dark, with real popcorn butter. Add in, I can pause the film being played to .... get more popcorn, and it is a win.

      Exactly this. I haven't seen a movie in the theater in years, because I can sit in my comfy leather recliner, with a beer and a joint (legal here in Canada) if I want, and because I can play at whatever volume works on that day -- sometimes I don't want full theater volume, sometimes I do.

      A movie I really want to see I'll buy on BluRay (which these days is mostly Marvel and DC movies since that's my form of mindless entertainment), and then watch it any time I wish.

      Tell me again why I should go to the theater?

      I haven't found a good reason in years.

      Sure, it's not the giant screen ... but my feet don't stick to the floor, there are no screaming kids, and I don't have to deal with idiots texting during the film.

      Between Netflix and the discs I buy, pretty much that covers my movie needs. Anything else, doesn't matter much to me.

    3. Re: Rise in Home Theater by ljw1004 · · Score: 1

      If you're wearing pajamas, I too would rather that you stay home than sit in the movie theater next to me.

      (Personally, I go to movies for IMAX. I feel more immersed when the scene fills my peripheral vision. Most recent film was Apollo 11. It was 100% stunning on that giant screen with the serious sound system.)

    4. Re:Rise in Home Theater by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Informative

      A friend took his three daughters to see the new Mary Poppins film and a McDonalds. Cost him 140 Euro.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:Rise in Home Theater by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You can have that at any time in my home.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:Rise in Home Theater by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      My home theater is still on par with movie theaters

      Go to a better movie theater. No your system is not on par, even if you had a mega screen.

      Tell me again why I should go to the theater?

      You shouldn't. You don't see the value in it the way other people do. But you're an individual.

    7. Re:Rise in Home Theater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trust me, no one wants you there either.

    8. Re:Rise in Home Theater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can have that at any time in my home.

      And it's Opportunist ( 166417 ) for the win ...

      A/S/L?

      Fuck it, just /L ... I'm not fussy at my age. Can we cuddle afterwards? Sometimes it's nice to be held. ;-)

    9. Re:Rise in Home Theater by Anubis+IV · · Score: 4, Insightful

      For me, despite having a powerful surround sound setup with a good-sized screen and comfortable seating at home, there actually are several circumstances where it still makes sense to head to the theater. It all comes down to the individual, however.

      1) When the audience adds to the experience. Being in a packed theater (with spacious, comfy recliners) on opening night for Infinity War was loads of fun. The theater was incredibly animated, with a lot of whooping and cheering as each superhero engaged in their heroics. While you definitely don't need it, having an engaged crowd can really add something special to the movie watching experience for certain types of movies (e.g. action and comedy, sometimes horror), in much the same way that '90s-era sitcoms are much better with a laugh track than without.

      2) When the film is big on spectacle and bluster. While horror, romcom, comedy, drama, suspense, etc. don't really benefit much from a bigger screen or better speakers, big budget blockbuster action flicks do a better job of being even more larger-than-life when they're on a huge screen with sound that can rattle you to the core. Even among those of us who have decent setups at home, few would suggest that they're truly on par with the technical aspects of the theater. For bigger-than-life films, it may be worth the (potentially marginal) technical improvement you get from going to the biggest screen with the best sound you can find.

      3) When the when matters. For most movies, I don't care when I see them. If they're good today, they'll be just as good in five years, and if they won't be good in five years, then they probably weren't actually good today either. But if you're one of the people who is into a long-running franchise (e.g. Marvel, Star Wars, Bond, Conjuring, etc.), there's an element of needing to keep up so that you know what's going on/don't get left behind. If there's a movie in that franchise that you want to see in theaters (for whatever reason), but the previous one won't come out for home release before the new one arrives in theaters, heading to the theater for the previous release (e.g. Captain Marvel before Endgame) might be your only (legal) way to keep up.

      4) When there's artistic expression at play. Certain directors care very deeply about the technical aspects of how their films are presented. Perhaps they filmed in IMAX (e.g. Christopher Nolan) or true 3D (e.g. James Cameron). Perhaps they filmed at higher frame rates (e.g. Peter Jackson). Perhaps they're using a very particular aspect ratio (e.g Stanley Kubrick). Depending on the circumstances, it may be that only a small fraction of theaters will show the film the exact way it was intended to be shown, and oftentimes no home release will ever get it exactly right according to the director's standards. If that sort of stuff is something that matters to you, you may have no choice but to see it in the theater. I've known people who drove hundreds of miles to see a film in a theater that was actually capable of showing the film in exactly the way it was intended to be shown.

      5) When it's cheaper. Ours is an unusual situation, admittedly, but movie tickets are really cheap where I live (Bryan/College Station, Texas). As in, Friday night general admission tickets are just $10 for off-brand IMAX ($11 if you want name-brand IMAX at the other big theater) or just $7 for a regular screening, and it's even cheaper on Tuesdays, at just $7 for off-brand IMAX and $4.50 for regular. Even cheaper if you're a student or senior. At prices like those, both my wife and I can go see a film two, three, possibly even four times for less than the cost of a new blu-ray, and we can do it months earlier too. $9 for an evening's entertainment for the both of us is an easy ask, particularly so if it's a movie we want to see but don't intend to own.

    10. Re:Rise in Home Theater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where are you getting steaks for that cheap?

    11. Re:Rise in Home Theater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > When the audience adds to the experience

      Maybe I'm being too selective about the movies I'm seeing in theaters, or maybe I'm anti-social, but I've *never* in my life had an experience where having an audience "added" anything positive to it.

    12. Re:Rise in Home Theater by umghhh · · Score: 1

      where was that? In Paris maybe? //

    13. Re:Rise in Home Theater by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1

      The Rocky Horror Picture Show is the only example I can come up with where the audience genuinely adds to the experience.

    14. Re:Rise in Home Theater by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      That's fair. Like I said right at the start, it all comes down to the individual, so if it doesn't work for you, that's fine.

      Even as someone who enjoys a good theater crowd, I've probably had more instances of theater-goers being annoying than I've had of theaters being awesome, but over the years I've learned that opening night for a big new film is a great time to have an awesome experience (it's the fans who bought their tickets weeks in advance and are excited to be there), whereas something like a Friday night for a foreign language flick is probably a bad idea (it's people who decided to watch a random film on a whim because they didn't have weekend plans, and thus have no compunction against being a distraction if it's boring or confusing to them). YMMV.

    15. Re:Rise in Home Theater by fleabay · · Score: 1

      How much was it just to see the McDonalds?

    16. Re:Rise in Home Theater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > When it's cheaper. Ours is an unusual situation, admittedly, but movie tickets are really cheap where I live (Bryan/College Station, Texas).

      That's the thing. Movie ticket prices are outrageous in places where housing prices are also high (New York City). Meaning that getting out of their apartment means spending quite a bit of money.

      You live someplace where the houses are large enough for dedicated home theaters.

  2. Because Disney... by Virtucon · · Score: 1

    The Rat is everywhere, at least with subscription services there's still some diversity left. Fuck your $10 popcorn

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  3. Box office is no longer an accurate metric... by Crash+Dummy+Redux · · Score: 2

    I pay $20 per month for AMC A-List program to see up to 12 movies per month. I typically see a movie every weekend. Concession sales may be a better metric since that is the whole point for giving away seats.

    1. Re: Box office is no longer an accurate metric... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Box office is no longer accurate because studios are buying out seats and giving away tickets on a large scale in order to pretend movies are more successful than they actually are. It's another accounting trick.

    2. Re: Box office is no longer an accurate metric... by Crash+Dummy+Redux · · Score: 1

      That was a frequent accusation when Captain Marvel came out. However, no proof was ever provided that Disney was buying out entire theaters to prop up the box office numbers.

    3. Re: Box office is no longer an accurate metric... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do you have proof that this was a frequent accusation
      by who
      when
      you have provided no proof for your content-free meandering opinion

    4. Re: Box office is no longer an accurate metric... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There were plenty of people taking selfies in their empty theaters that claimed to be almost full when purchasing tickets. Just because you choose to ignore the proof doesn't make it untrue.

    5. Re: Box office is no longer an accurate metric... by Crash+Dummy+Redux · · Score: 1

      That's funny. I saw Captain Marvel twice a week apart. Both times the theaters were sold out and full of people who stayed to watch the cat cough up the Tesseract. Of course, I'm on the west coast. I saw plenty of selfies of empty theaters in flyover country, but no proof that any of those theaters were sold out.

    6. Re: Box office is no longer an accurate metric... by Crash+Dummy+Redux · · Score: 2

      YouTube. SJW videos were screaming how bad Captain Marvel and how much money Disney lost before the movie came out. Captain Marvel is fast approaching $1B in world wide box office sales.

    7. Re: Box office is no longer an accurate metric... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how is that proof of anything

    8. Re: Box office is no longer an accurate metric... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're wrong. You're welcome.

    9. Re: Box office is no longer an accurate metric... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crash Dummy Redux == CDR == Christopher Dale Reimer == creimer. He has a total of 50+ sock puppet accounts on Slashdot!
      Proof: They all post the same sock puppets karma whoring and/or bragging stories and/or spam links.

      Here are two identical posts from 2 different sock puppets:
      Crash Dummy Redux:
      https://slashdot.org/comments....
      The Original CDR:
      https://ask.slashdot.org/comme...

      Last year, I proved to creimer that I was running a click bot to inflate the views on his stupid channel and he admitted it! He has even written about it on twitter, go check and you will see.

      I specifically targeted music videos to make him believe that he had just discovered a new Klondike! It was very funny to watch him come on Slashdot bragging about how much his new music videos were successful before I finally told him about the click bot!

      Then, when the party was over, I proved to him that I was the one inflating his views, I told him in advance that I would stop the views on one specific video which I did and he confirmed that fact on twitter.

      Well, he just posted a imaginary story here where he pretends that pedophiles were looking at his kid music video. Maybe he figures that pedophiles are better click bait material. My bot isn't a pedophile! No pedophiles looked at his video at all!

      See his post here:
      https://medium.com/@cdreimerth...

      He is such a liar and a thief! He will say or do anything just to get 1 click on his stupid videos which have amazon affiliate links attached to them all over the place!

      --
      -the biggest loser on Slashdot

    10. Re: Box office is no longer an accurate metric... by Crash+Dummy+Redux · · Score: 1

      Fuck off, asshole.

    11. Re: Box office is no longer an accurate metric... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Out of meds again Chris?

      By the way, nice video of your chubby fingers playing with a doll! Congratulations! This really shows your genius!

    12. Re: Box office is no longer an accurate metric... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did that make you horny? Did you jack off to your cellphone? Did you do that to the Russian schoolboys?

    13. Re: Box office is no longer an accurate metric... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, in fact you are the biggest loser on Slashdot. Congratulations! That's quite an achievement.

    14. Re: Box office is no longer an accurate metric... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes i love seeing your ham-fisted ogre fingers picking apart a child's toy

    15. Re: Box office is no longer an accurate metric... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you enjoy picking apart the Russian school boys? How many looked like Chris? All of them?

    16. Re: Box office is no longer an accurate metric... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The closest I've seen was an article from Business Insider that said movie fraud went both ways: theaters under reporting sales to pocket more money AND production companies holding "ghost screenings"

    17. Re: Box office is no longer an accurate metric... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're a fat retard

  4. Just like arcades by Tempest_2084 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The whole trend with movie theaters losing ground to home theaters reminds me of what happened to arcades. Back in the 80's and early 90's they were the place to be because you could only experience the latest and greatest games at the arcade. But once home consoles caught up with the arcade machines they completely died out because of the convenience of having the latest and greatest at home meant you didn't have to put up with all the obnoxiousness of arcades (not to mention the gang fights).

    Unless you're into the theater 'experience' (being around tons of people, gigantic screens, loud sound system) there's really no reason not to just wait for it to come out on DVD or Netflix and watch it home where you can choose when to watch, pause/rewind the movie, eat what you want, and not have to deal with obnoxious people for a fraction of the cost. Unless movie theaters do some serious innovating (3-D part duex seems to have fizzled) they're going to disappear in the next decade or so except for a small few for those who still want the 'experience'.

    1. Re:Just like arcades by Crash+Dummy+Redux · · Score: 2

      Arcades died out because there were more machines than players. A strip mall that I lived next door to in the 1980s had a 7-11 with a pair of machines, a luandrymat with ten machines, and a deli with 20 machines. That's 32 machines in one strip mall. The mall arcade didn't have that many machines. That was an extreme example. Most retail businesses at that time had one or two machines to cash in on the quarter craze..

    2. Re:Just like arcades by greatLearner4575 · · Score: 1

      This is a great point that you make about Arcades Vs Home game consoles. I think you are correct and it will depend on how the cinema is able to keep ahead of the home environment in terms of innovation.

  5. I pay nearly nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Movies and TV shows these days suck or maybe I just lost interest in devoting so much of my attention to them. My media consumption is mostly music via YouTube. I haven't purchased a video or music since 1999. No Netflix, no Amazon Prime, no Hulu, no cable. Every great while I'll go to a movie because there's something my girlfriend wants to watch but that's it, really.

    1. Re:I pay nearly nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here... I have no interest at all in seeing the latest episode/reboot of spiderman vs batman or whatever this weeks CGI puppet show is. i dont even bother pirating them anymore.

      Its not even worth watching for free. Why on earth would i go out & pay to see it?

    2. Re:I pay nearly nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ayup - eventually one gets bored with Hollywood and paperbacks. They are so predictable, that it isn't worth watching or reading. Same with pop music. I haven't spent significant money on music, movies or story books in decades.

    3. Re:I pay nearly nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same except I love engineering YouTube (like AvE and EEVBlog). Modern media is such nonsense that unless the GF wants to really see it I have no interest. I'm quite happy to go out for nature hikes or to enjoy the beach. But too much SJW and poor quality content in general and I have no interest in spending a single dollar on this stuff.

  6. The message is clear by erp_consultant · · Score: 1

    Home theater trumps movie theater. I understand the appeal of having a night out and for some things, like a date or taking the kids out for the night, the movie theater is great. But those are relatively few and far between and for most viewing my home theater system is great. I love the convenience of being able to start and stop whenever I like. Not to mention that a night out at the movies is quite expensive compared to the monthly cost of Netflix and Amazon.

    Personally I haven't bought a DVD in years. I think I have bought about 3 Blueray disks, just out of curiosity. So to me DVDs are dead.

    I think it's going to be very hard for movie theaters to thrive. Other than the big screen and big sound the only other advantage is that you get to see new movies there before they appear on Netflix. For me I'm so busy doing other things that I can wait to see movies when I get around to it. Big Hollywood productions seem to be overproduced formula themed events that lack substance for the most part. For the most part I have left them behind for more compelling entertainment options.

  7. Flat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like Brie's ass!

  8. Less and worse by thunderclees · · Score: 1

    The theater has a charm of its own though how much remains to be seen as a bespoke 86" screen can be had for just over $2k in the US. The real problem is the studios as there are less movies coming out and more of them are bad. With the consolidation of the studios there are fewer interesting films making it out before they are turned into pablum.

    1. Re: Less and worse by zozo22 · · Score: 0

      after all so it's biologically possible. But there doesn't seem to be any mechanism of a person actually noticing it as a sense, so maybe these brain waves are just trees falling in the forest, nobody there to https://xender.pro/ https://discord.software/ https://omegle.onl/

  9. You can get that in home theater too by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    You can get an IMAX level of immersion if you get a projector and sit close to the screen.

    You can even get curved projection screens. Though I wonder how projector focus is affected, and if any projectors allow for curvature adjustment...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:You can get that in home theater too by umghhh · · Score: 1

      I use space cookies instead. In fact I do not watch movies then at all and get completely immersed. Last time I had 6 fingers and the other time I got to be a tongue.I think movies especially of today are overvalued.

  10. Exhibitionism by DrYak · · Score: 1

    public sex with a stranger?

    You know, "Archangel Michael" never mentionned that his living room curtains needed to be closed.
    Nor that he won't invite people that you don't know.
    Nor that he'll shotgun the face out of anyone attempting to look through the windows.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  11. Re: Box office is no longer an accurate metric.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.businessinsider.com/dwayne-johnson-china-what-is-box-office-fraud-2018-7

  12. People only have so many yours in a day by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    People only have so much disposable income every week.
    Why risk paying for a political movie script with low quality actors?
    Put the same hours into streaming movies and series?
    Lots of better ways to spend that money and ways to work out what to do with a few free hours.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  13. It Just Might Be... by rally2xs · · Score: 1

    Hollywood's decision to insert identity politics into everything, as well as international politics with the theme "America is Bad." We don't much appreciate this sort of preachifying around here. You make Captain Marvel to be working on the side of evil, and the former bad guys are just oppressed by the supposed good guys, and that just shrieks that America is the Kree, and everyone else are the opproessed. Look, the good guys in all the superhero magazines throughout their existence have always been a stand-in for the USA - Superman was the USA after WW2, and was absolutely invulnerable except for kryponite, and then we lost the Viet Nam War. Suddenly, Superman could be hurt, because Superman WAS the USA. Then we have the Hollywood bunch promoting anti-Americanism, and now Superman can actually be killed. That is Hollywood attacking the USA as evil, no 2 ways about it, and I think some people actually feel it without putting those little 2's and 2's together. We also have guys like Tarantino badmouthing the police - more identity politics for which I didn't see the Hateful 8, even tho that was not this year, but the string of America-bashing flicks are not so enjoyable if you don't believe the President is evil and the USA is evil and the sunrise is racist and the sunrise is racist because of the USA.

    Stuff it, Hollywood. Get back on track and embrace patriotism, and quit with the identity politics that has things like the Star Trek Discovery crew being captianed by a female that goes hand-to-hand with Klingons and survives - which Kirk could barely get away with, and no person in a 140 lb frame without testosterone-fueld muscles is going to survive against a 250 lb Klingon. Saw the 1st 1 or 2 eposides, sand, "Naw", and have't looked at another one. Get real, people - guys do hand to hand combat, not gals, and there's no fictiionalizing that Hollywood can do to change that. Play the magic card like Wonder Woman and it becomes OK, but otherwse... naw, not interesting.

    So, get real, give us something that adds up when we bring out our 2's plus 2's, and maybe we can enjoy it. I see most everything anyway, as I love going to the theater, but the difference is when you give me something good, I'll see it twice, or maybe even thrice. But anti-American stuff that offends me, or completely stupid stuff like whispy females surviving Klingons hand-to-hand... that's a one-and-done.